Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, OR; Suspension of Reporting and Assessment Requirements, 65937-65938 [2010-27196]
Download as PDF
65937
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 207
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 924
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0054; FV10–924–2
FIR]
Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, OR; Suspension of
Reporting and Assessment
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that suspended the reporting and
assessment requirements prescribed
under the Washington-Oregon fresh
prune marketing order. The marketing
order regulates the handling of fresh
prunes grown in designated counties in
Washington and in Umatilla County,
Oregon, and is administered locally by
the Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune
Marketing Committee (Committee). On
June 1, 2010, the Committee
unanimously voted to terminate
Marketing Order No. 924. Since the only
regulatory actions then in effect were
the reporting and assessment
requirements, the Committee included a
recommendation to immediately
suspend those activities while USDA
processes the termination request. The
reporting and assessment requirements
will remain suspended until reinstated
or permanently terminated.
DATES: Effective October 28, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Curry or Gary Olson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
326–7440, or E-mail:
Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order and agreement
regulations by viewing a guide at the
following Web site: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetch
TemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by
contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail: Antoinette.Carter
@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 924 (7 CFR 924),
regulating the handling of fresh prunes
grown in designated counties in
Washington and in Umatilla County,
Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Marketing Order No. 924 has been in
effect since 1960 and has provided the
fresh prune industry in Washington and
Oregon with authority for grade, size,
quality, maturity, pack, and container
regulations, as well as authority for
inspection requirements. The order also
authorizes production research and
marketing research and development
projects, as well as the necessary
reporting and recordkeeping functions
required for operation. Based on the
Committee’s recommendation, USDA
suspended the order’s handling
regulations in May 2006. These
handling regulations required that
certain varieties of fresh prunes meet
minimum grade standards. The
Committee believed that the costs of
inspection outweighed the benefits
provided from having the regulatory
requirements in effect.
Following the regulatory suspension,
the Committee continued to levy
assessments in order to maintain its
functionality. The Committee felt that it
should continue to fund its full
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
operational capability in order to gauge
the merits of the handling regulation
suspension. When it recommended
suspension of the handling regulations,
the Committee also recommended the
establishment of reporting requirements
for the purpose of tracking shipments
and collecting assessments. Prior to the
handling regulation suspension, the
Committee relied on the Federal-State
Inspection Service to provide it with
copies of the certificates that accompany
each lot of inspected fresh prunes. The
inspection certificates contained
information necessary for the
Committee to collect assessments from
each of the regulated handlers. A new
section 924.160 and Committee form
‘‘Handler Statement for WashingtonOregon Fresh Prunes’’ were
implemented in the Federal Register on
May 9, 2006, at 71 FR 26817. The
Committee used this form to collect
fresh prune shipment information and
to monitor market and crop conditions,
thus helping it to make a determination
regarding the impact of non-regulation
on the industry.
Based on its analysis that the
regulatory suspension has not
negatively impacted the marketing of
fresh prunes over the last four years,
and the fact that the Washington-Oregon
fresh prune industry has been
decreasing in size and volume in recent
years, the Committee determined that
there is no longer a need for the order,
and thus recommended termination at
the meeting held in Prosser,
Washington, on June 1, 2010.
In addition, the Committee
determined that there is no need to
continue collecting assessments and
requiring reports for the sole purpose of
maintaining its functionality, thus
recommended that the assessment rate
and reporting requirements be
immediately suspended. This action
will relieve the industry of the
assessment and reporting burden during
the pendency of the termination
process.
The Committee recommended a
budget of $6,085 for the remainder of
the period leading to order termination.
The budgeted amount was established
on the basis of the amount remaining in
the Committee’s monetary reserve. The
budget in its entirety will provide for
such operating expenses as are
necessary during the termination
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
65938
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
process, including a final financial
review and management compensation.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on July 23, 2010, and
effective on July 24, 2010 (75 FR 43040,
Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0054, FV10–924–
2 IR), §§ 924.160 and 924.236 were
suspended.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are six handlers of WashingtonOregon fresh prunes subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 56 fresh prune producers
in the regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
Based on information compiled by
both the Committee and the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the
average producer price for fresh prunes
in 2009 was approximately $385 per
ton. With 4,260 tons of fresh prunes
shipped from the Washington and
Oregon production areas in 2009, this
equates to average producer revenue of
about $30,000. In addition, AMS Market
News Service reported that 2009 f.o.b.
prices ranged from $12.00 to $18.00 per
30-pound container, thus the entire
Washington-Oregon fresh prune
industry handled less than $7,000,000
worth of prunes last season. In view of
the foregoing, the majority of
Washington-Oregon fresh prune
producers and handlers may be
classified as small entities.
The Committee made the
recommendation to suspend the
reporting and assessment requirements
as an adjunct to the recommendation to
terminate the order. As such, the only
other alternative would have been to
continue to assess handlers and to
require reports, options not seriously
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
considered since additional funds are
not required.
This action continues in effect the
action that suspended the reporting and
assessment obligations imposed on
handlers. During any period when
effective, assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers and some of
the costs may be passed on to
producers. This suspension of the
reporting and assessment requirements
reduces the burden on handlers and
should also reduce the burden on
producers.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
prune handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the WashingtonOregon fresh prune industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the June 1, 2010,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
September 21, 2010. No comments were
received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule,
without change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=
0900006480b1fd84.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (75 FR 43039, July 23, 2010)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
PART 924—FRESH PRUNES GROWN
IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON AND IN UMATILLA
COUNTY, OREGON
Accordingly, the interim rule that
amended 7 CFR part 924 and was
published at 75 FR 43039 on July 23,
2010, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
■
Dated: October 21, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–27196 Filed 10–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 97
[Docket No. 30750; Amdt. No. 3397]
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
This rule establishes, amends,
suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are
needed because of the adoption of new
or revised criteria, or because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of
new navigational facilities, adding new
obstacles, or changing air traffic
requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace and to
promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected
airports.
DATES: This rule is effective October 27,
2010. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of October 27,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matter
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
Prunes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For Examination—
1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA
Headquarters Building, 800
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65937-65938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27196]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 65937]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 924
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0054; FV10-924-2 FIR]
Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, OR; Suspension of Reporting and Assessment
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule that suspended the reporting and
assessment requirements prescribed under the Washington-Oregon fresh
prune marketing order. The marketing order regulates the handling of
fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla
County, Oregon, and is administered locally by the Washington-Oregon
Fresh Prune Marketing Committee (Committee). On June 1, 2010, the
Committee unanimously voted to terminate Marketing Order No. 924. Since
the only regulatory actions then in effect were the reporting and
assessment requirements, the Committee included a recommendation to
immediately suspend those activities while USDA processes the
termination request. The reporting and assessment requirements will
remain suspended until reinstated or permanently terminated.
DATES: Effective October 28, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Curry or Gary Olson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax:
(503) 326-7440, or E-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order and agreement regulations by viewing a guide at
the following Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 924 (7 CFR 924), regulating the handling of
fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla
County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
Marketing Order No. 924 has been in effect since 1960 and has
provided the fresh prune industry in Washington and Oregon with
authority for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container
regulations, as well as authority for inspection requirements. The
order also authorizes production research and marketing research and
development projects, as well as the necessary reporting and
recordkeeping functions required for operation. Based on the
Committee's recommendation, USDA suspended the order's handling
regulations in May 2006. These handling regulations required that
certain varieties of fresh prunes meet minimum grade standards. The
Committee believed that the costs of inspection outweighed the benefits
provided from having the regulatory requirements in effect.
Following the regulatory suspension, the Committee continued to
levy assessments in order to maintain its functionality. The Committee
felt that it should continue to fund its full operational capability in
order to gauge the merits of the handling regulation suspension. When
it recommended suspension of the handling regulations, the Committee
also recommended the establishment of reporting requirements for the
purpose of tracking shipments and collecting assessments. Prior to the
handling regulation suspension, the Committee relied on the Federal-
State Inspection Service to provide it with copies of the certificates
that accompany each lot of inspected fresh prunes. The inspection
certificates contained information necessary for the Committee to
collect assessments from each of the regulated handlers. A new section
924.160 and Committee form ``Handler Statement for Washington-Oregon
Fresh Prunes'' were implemented in the Federal Register on May 9, 2006,
at 71 FR 26817. The Committee used this form to collect fresh prune
shipment information and to monitor market and crop conditions, thus
helping it to make a determination regarding the impact of non-
regulation on the industry.
Based on its analysis that the regulatory suspension has not
negatively impacted the marketing of fresh prunes over the last four
years, and the fact that the Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry has
been decreasing in size and volume in recent years, the Committee
determined that there is no longer a need for the order, and thus
recommended termination at the meeting held in Prosser, Washington, on
June 1, 2010.
In addition, the Committee determined that there is no need to
continue collecting assessments and requiring reports for the sole
purpose of maintaining its functionality, thus recommended that the
assessment rate and reporting requirements be immediately suspended.
This action will relieve the industry of the assessment and reporting
burden during the pendency of the termination process.
The Committee recommended a budget of $6,085 for the remainder of
the period leading to order termination. The budgeted amount was
established on the basis of the amount remaining in the Committee's
monetary reserve. The budget in its entirety will provide for such
operating expenses as are necessary during the termination
[[Page 65938]]
process, including a final financial review and management
compensation.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on July 23,
2010, and effective on July 24, 2010 (75 FR 43040, Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-
0054, FV10-924-2 IR), Sec. Sec. 924.160 and 924.236 were suspended.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are six handlers of Washington-Oregon fresh prunes subject to
regulation under the order and approximately 56 fresh prune producers
in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
Based on information compiled by both the Committee and the
National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average producer price
for fresh prunes in 2009 was approximately $385 per ton. With 4,260
tons of fresh prunes shipped from the Washington and Oregon production
areas in 2009, this equates to average producer revenue of about
$30,000. In addition, AMS Market News Service reported that 2009 f.o.b.
prices ranged from $12.00 to $18.00 per 30-pound container, thus the
entire Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry handled less than
$7,000,000 worth of prunes last season. In view of the foregoing, the
majority of Washington-Oregon fresh prune producers and handlers may be
classified as small entities.
The Committee made the recommendation to suspend the reporting and
assessment requirements as an adjunct to the recommendation to
terminate the order. As such, the only other alternative would have
been to continue to assess handlers and to require reports, options not
seriously considered since additional funds are not required.
This action continues in effect the action that suspended the
reporting and assessment obligations imposed on handlers. During any
period when effective, assessments are applied uniformly on all
handlers and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. This
suspension of the reporting and assessment requirements reduces the
burden on handlers and should also reduce the burden on producers.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large prune handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the June 1, 2010, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before September 21, 2010. No comments were received. Therefore, for
the reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule
as a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b1fd84.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 43039, July 23, 2010) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
Prunes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 924--FRESH PRUNES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
AND IN UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON
0
Accordingly, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 924 and was
published at 75 FR 43039 on July 23, 2010, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: October 21, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-27196 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P