Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Permit, Santa Barbara County, CA, 65646-65647 [2010-27002]
Download as PDF
65646
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices
Cruces, New Mexico 88005, (575) 525–
4300.
Pecos RAC
Doug Burger, Pecos District Office,
BLM, 2909 West Second Street, Roswell,
New Mexico 88201, (575) 627–0272.
Certification Statement: I hereby
certify that the BLM’s New Mexico
RACs are necessary and in the public
interest in connection with the
Secretary’s responsibilities to manage
the lands, resources, and facilities
administered by the BLM.
Linda S.C. Rundell,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–27029 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2010–N235; 1112–0000–
81440–F2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Permit, Santa Barbara
County, CA
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from Pacific Renewable
Energy Generation LLC (applicant) for
an incidental take permit under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We are considering
issuing an incidental take permit (ITP)
that would authorize the applicant’s
take of the federally endangered El
Segundo Blue Butterfly incidental to
otherwise lawful activities that would
result in the loss of Coast Buckwheat,
which serves as butterfly habitat. We
invite comments from the public on the
application, which includes the
Geotechnical Boring Project Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP), and on our
preliminary determination that the HCP
qualifies as a low-effect plan that is
eligible for a categorical exclusion under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by
November 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy
of the HCP, draft Environmental Action
Statement, Low-Effect Screening Form,
and related documents on the Internet at
https://www.fws.gov/ventura/, or you
may request documents by U.S. mail or
phone (see below). Please address
written comments to Diane K. Noda,
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Oct 25, 2010
Jkt 223001
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003. You may
alternatively send comments by
facsimile to (805) 644–3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jen
Lechuga, HCP Coordinator, at the
Ventura address above, or by telephone
at (805) 644–1766 extension 224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have
received an application from Pacific
Renewable Energy Generation LLC for
an incidental take permit under the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We are
considering issuing an incidental take
permit (ITP) that would authorize the
applicant’s take of the federally
endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly
(Euphilotes battoides allyni) incidental
to otherwise lawful activities that would
result in the loss of 356 plants of Coast
Buckwheat, which serves as habitat for
El Segundo Blue Butterfly near the west
end of the Santa Ynez Mountains, 7
miles south of Lompoc, Santa Barbara
County, California. We invite comments
from the public on the application and
associated documents, and on our
preliminary determination that the HCP
qualifies as a low-effect plan eligible for
categorical exclusion under NEPA.
Background
The El Segundo Blue Butterfly was
listed as endangered on June 1, 1976 (41
FR 22041). The Gaviota Tarplant was
listed as endangered on March 20, 2000
(65 FR 14888) and has been listed as
endangered under the state of
California’s Endangered Species Act
(California Fish and Game Code,
Sections 2050 et seq.) since January
1990. Section 9 of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) and our implementing
Federal regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17
prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of fish or wildlife
species listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of listed fish or
wildlife is defined under the Act as ‘‘to
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1532). However,
under limited circumstances, we issue
permits to authorize incidental take.
‘‘Incidental Take’’ is defined by the Act
as take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, carrying out of an otherwise
lawful activity. Regulations governing
incidental take permits for threatened
and endangered species are,
respectively, in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22.
Issuance of an ITP also must not
jeopardize the existence of federally
listed fish, wildlife, or plant species.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Act’s take prohibitions do not
apply to federally listed plant species on
private lands unless such take would be
in violation of State law. In addition to
meeting other criteria, the HCP’s
proposed actions must not jeopardize
the existence of federally listed fish,
wildlife, or plants. The applicant has
submitted an application to the
California Department of Fish and Game
for an incidental take permit pursuant to
the California Endangered Species Act.
The applicant proposes to conduct 43
geotechnical borings about 8 miles
northwest of Point Conception, near the
west end of the Santa Ynez Mountains,
and 7 miles south of Lompoc, Santa
Barbara County, California. The
geotechnical borings will provide the
data necessary to develop and complete
the design and engineering plans for the
Lompoc Wind Energy Project. Phase II
of the Lompoc Wind Energy Project
would involve the construction and
operation of wind turbines. Any
potential impacts to listed species
caused by the construction and
operation of the Lompoc Wind Energy
Project will be addressed through a
subsequent consultation or permitting
process under the Act. The geotechnical
boring project is viewed as a discrete
action because it does not guarantee that
Phase II would occur. The proposed
project would result in temporary direct
impacts to 0.69 acres of El Segundo Blue
Butterfly habitat and 0.64 acres of the
Gaviota Tarplant habitat.
The applicant proposes to implement
the following measures to minimize and
mitigate for the loss of El Segundo Blue
Butterfly habitat and Gaviota Tarplant
within the permit area: (1) Establish a
permanent conservation area that will
preserve 712 coast buckwheat plants
through a conservation easement and
provide for the management of the area;
(2) restore degraded native Central
Coastal Scrub and Grassland habitats
within the conservation area; (3)
enhance 0.49 acres of Gaviota Tarplant;
(4) design access routes to boring sites
to minimize impacts to Gaviota Tarplant
areas; (5) minimize ground disturbance;
(6) use silt fencing and soil salvaging
techniques to minimize impacts to the
El Segundo Blue Butterfly and Gaviota
Tarplant; (7) avoid flight season of the
El Segundo Blue Butterfly; (8) conduct
dust control, relocation of El Segundo
Blue Butterflies, staging, and boundary
delineation to minimize El Segundo
Blue Butterfly impacts; and (9) conduct
ongoing monitoring for both species to
track compliance with the permit, the
effects of the permitted activities, and
effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
In the proposed HCP, the applicant
considers two alternatives to the taking
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly and
Gaviota Tarplant. The No Action
alternative would maintain current
conditions, the project would not be
implemented, no impacts to the El
Segundo Blue Butterfly and Gaviota
Tarplant would occur, and an incidental
take permit application would not be
submitted to the Service. The second
alternative would involve helicopter
access to the site, which would
eliminate the risk of driving over the
listed plant species.
We are requesting comments on our
preliminary determination that the
applicant’s proposal will have a minor
or negligible effect on the species
covered in the plan, and that the plan
qualifies as a ‘‘low-effect’’ HCP as
defined by our Habitat Conservation
Planning Handbook (November 1996).
We base our determination that the HCP
qualifies as a low-effect HCP on the
following three criteria: (1)
Implementation of the applicant’s
project description in the HCP would
result in minor or negligible effects on
federally listed, proposed, and
candidate species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the HCP would result
in minor or negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources; and
(3) impacts of the HCP—considered
together with the impacts of other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable
similarly situated projects—would not
result, over time, in cumulative effects
to the environmental values or resources
that would be considered significant.
Based upon our analysis of these
criteria, we have made a preliminary
determination that the approval of the
HCP and issuance of an ITP qualify for
categorical exclusions under the NEPA
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as provided by
the Department of Interior Manual (516
DM 2 Appendix 2 and 516 DM 8). Based
upon our review of public comments
that we receive in response to this
notice, this preliminary determination
may be revised.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the HCP and
comments we receive to determine
whether the ITP application meets the
requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act and implementing regulations
(50 CFR 17.22). We will also evaluate
whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B)
permit would comply with section 7 of
the Act by conducting an intra-Service
section 7 consultation. We will use the
results of this consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
or not to issue an ITP. If the
requirements are met, we will issue the
ITP to the applicant for the incidental
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Oct 25, 2010
Jkt 223001
take of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly.
We will make the final permit decision
no sooner than 30 days after the date of
this notice.
Public Comments
If you wish to comment on the permit
application, HCP, and associated
documents, you may submit comments
by any one of the methods in
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
65647
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
J. Paul Loether,
National Register of Historic Places/National
Historic Landmarks Program.
AMERICAN SAMOA
Western District
Governor H. Rex Lee Auditorium, Rte. 1,
William McKinley Memorial HWY,Utulei,
10000888
CALIFORNIA
Humboldt County
Hoopa Valley Adobe, Campus St, Hoopa,
10000893
Authority
CONNECTICUT
We provide this notice under section
10 of the Act (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and
NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Hartford County
Dated: October 19, 2010.
Diane K. Noda,
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, Ventura, California.
[FR Doc. 2010–27002 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before October 2, 2010.
Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part
60, written comments are being
accepted concerning the significance of
the nominated properties under the
National Register criteria for evaluation.
Comments may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by November 10, 2010.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Oxford—Whitney Streets Historic District,
Fern, Oxford, and Whitney Sts, Hartford,
10000896
Underwood Computing Machine Company
Factory, 56 Arbor St, Hartford, 10000895
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia
Atlas Theater and Shops, 1313–33 H Street,
NE., Washington, DC, 10000909
Dahlgreen Courts, (Apartment Buildings in
Washington, DC, MPS) 2504–2520 10th St,
NE., Washington, 10000901
IOWA
Jasper County
Fred Maytag Park Historic District, 301 S
22th Ave., W, Newton, 10000917
Polk County
Hubbell Warehouse, 340 SW 5th St, Des
Moines, 10000894
Story County
Delta Upsilon Chapter House, 117 Ash Ave.,
Ames, 10000919
Webster County
Fort Dodge Downtown Historic District, 1st
Ave N, Central Ave, and 1st Ave., S from
3rd St., on West to 12th St., on East, Fort
Dodge, 10000918
KENTUCKY
Breathitt County
Morris Fork Presbyterian Church and
Community Center, 908 Morris Fork Rd,
Morris Fork, 10000908
Fayette County
Headley, Hal Price, Sr., House, 1236 Standish
Way, Lexington, 10000907
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65646-65647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2010-N235; 1112-0000-81440-F2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Permit, Santa
Barbara County, CA
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from Pacific Renewable Energy Generation LLC
(applicant) for an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are considering issuing an incidental
take permit (ITP) that would authorize the applicant's take of the
federally endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly incidental to otherwise
lawful activities that would result in the loss of Coast Buckwheat,
which serves as butterfly habitat. We invite comments from the public
on the application, which includes the Geotechnical Boring Project
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and on our preliminary determination
that the HCP qualifies as a low-effect plan that is eligible for a
categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
November 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy of the HCP, draft Environmental
Action Statement, Low-Effect Screening Form, and related documents on
the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/ventura/, or you may request
documents by U.S. mail or phone (see below). Please address written
comments to Diane K. Noda, Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003. You may alternatively send comments by facsimile to
(805) 644-3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jen Lechuga, HCP Coordinator, at the
Ventura address above, or by telephone at (805) 644-1766 extension 224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have received an application from Pacific
Renewable Energy Generation LLC for an incidental take permit under the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We are considering issuing an incidental
take permit (ITP) that would authorize the applicant's take of the
federally endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly (Euphilotes battoides
allyni) incidental to otherwise lawful activities that would result in
the loss of 356 plants of Coast Buckwheat, which serves as habitat for
El Segundo Blue Butterfly near the west end of the Santa Ynez
Mountains, 7 miles south of Lompoc, Santa Barbara County, California.
We invite comments from the public on the application and associated
documents, and on our preliminary determination that the HCP qualifies
as a low-effect plan eligible for categorical exclusion under NEPA.
Background
The El Segundo Blue Butterfly was listed as endangered on June 1,
1976 (41 FR 22041). The Gaviota Tarplant was listed as endangered on
March 20, 2000 (65 FR 14888) and has been listed as endangered under
the state of California's Endangered Species Act (California Fish and
Game Code, Sections 2050 et seq.) since January 1990. Section 9 of the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and our implementing Federal regulations
in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17 prohibit the
``take'' of fish or wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of listed fish or wildlife is defined under the Act as
``to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or
collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct'' (16 U.S.C.
1532). However, under limited circumstances, we issue permits to
authorize incidental take. ``Incidental Take'' is defined by the Act as
take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out of an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered species are, respectively, in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22. Issuance of an
ITP also must not jeopardize the existence of federally listed fish,
wildlife, or plant species.
The Act's take prohibitions do not apply to federally listed plant
species on private lands unless such take would be in violation of
State law. In addition to meeting other criteria, the HCP's proposed
actions must not jeopardize the existence of federally listed fish,
wildlife, or plants. The applicant has submitted an application to the
California Department of Fish and Game for an incidental take permit
pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act.
The applicant proposes to conduct 43 geotechnical borings about 8
miles northwest of Point Conception, near the west end of the Santa
Ynez Mountains, and 7 miles south of Lompoc, Santa Barbara County,
California. The geotechnical borings will provide the data necessary to
develop and complete the design and engineering plans for the Lompoc
Wind Energy Project. Phase II of the Lompoc Wind Energy Project would
involve the construction and operation of wind turbines. Any potential
impacts to listed species caused by the construction and operation of
the Lompoc Wind Energy Project will be addressed through a subsequent
consultation or permitting process under the Act. The geotechnical
boring project is viewed as a discrete action because it does not
guarantee that Phase II would occur. The proposed project would result
in temporary direct impacts to 0.69 acres of El Segundo Blue Butterfly
habitat and 0.64 acres of the Gaviota Tarplant habitat.
The applicant proposes to implement the following measures to
minimize and mitigate for the loss of El Segundo Blue Butterfly habitat
and Gaviota Tarplant within the permit area: (1) Establish a permanent
conservation area that will preserve 712 coast buckwheat plants through
a conservation easement and provide for the management of the area; (2)
restore degraded native Central Coastal Scrub and Grassland habitats
within the conservation area; (3) enhance 0.49 acres of Gaviota
Tarplant; (4) design access routes to boring sites to minimize impacts
to Gaviota Tarplant areas; (5) minimize ground disturbance; (6) use
silt fencing and soil salvaging techniques to minimize impacts to the
El Segundo Blue Butterfly and Gaviota Tarplant; (7) avoid flight season
of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly; (8) conduct dust control, relocation
of El Segundo Blue Butterflies, staging, and boundary delineation to
minimize El Segundo Blue Butterfly impacts; and (9) conduct ongoing
monitoring for both species to track compliance with the permit, the
effects of the permitted activities, and effectiveness of the
mitigation measures.
In the proposed HCP, the applicant considers two alternatives to
the taking
[[Page 65647]]
of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly and Gaviota Tarplant. The No Action
alternative would maintain current conditions, the project would not be
implemented, no impacts to the El Segundo Blue Butterfly and Gaviota
Tarplant would occur, and an incidental take permit application would
not be submitted to the Service. The second alternative would involve
helicopter access to the site, which would eliminate the risk of
driving over the listed plant species.
We are requesting comments on our preliminary determination that
the applicant's proposal will have a minor or negligible effect on the
species covered in the plan, and that the plan qualifies as a ``low-
effect'' HCP as defined by our Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook
(November 1996). We base our determination that the HCP qualifies as a
low-effect HCP on the following three criteria: (1) Implementation of
the applicant's project description in the HCP would result in minor or
negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species
and their habitats; (2) implementation of the HCP would result in minor
or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and
(3) impacts of the HCP--considered together with the impacts of other
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects--
would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to the environmental
values or resources that would be considered significant. Based upon
our analysis of these criteria, we have made a preliminary
determination that the approval of the HCP and issuance of an ITP
qualify for categorical exclusions under the NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), as provided by the Department of Interior Manual (516 DM 2
Appendix 2 and 516 DM 8). Based upon our review of public comments that
we receive in response to this notice, this preliminary determination
may be revised.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the HCP and comments we receive to determine
whether the ITP application meets the requirements of section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act and implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22). We
will also evaluate whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit
would comply with section 7 of the Act by conducting an intra-Service
section 7 consultation. We will use the results of this consultation,
in combination with the above findings, in our final analysis to
determine whether or not to issue an ITP. If the requirements are met,
we will issue the ITP to the applicant for the incidental take of the
El Segundo Blue Butterfly. We will make the final permit decision no
sooner than 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public Comments
If you wish to comment on the permit application, HCP, and
associated documents, you may submit comments by any one of the methods
in ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10 of the Act (U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: October 19, 2010.
Diane K. Noda,
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, Ventura,
California.
[FR Doc. 2010-27002 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P