Native American Tribal Insignia Database, 65611-65612 [2010-26975]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices
the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at
the above e-mail or street address.
The meeting will be conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the Commission and
FACA.
Dated in Washington, DC, October 21,
2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs
Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010–26996 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Native American Tribal Insignia
Database
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 27,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail:
InformationCollection@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0048 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Sharon Marsh,
Deputy Commissioner for Trademark
Examination Policy, Office of the
Commissioner for Trademarks, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1451, by telephone at 571–272–8900, or
by e-mail to Sharon.Marsh@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Trademark Law Treaty
Implementation Act of 1998 (Pub. L.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Oct 25, 2010
Jkt 223001
105–330, § 302, 112 Stat. 3071) required
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) to study issues
surrounding the protection of the
official insignia of federally- and Staterecognized Native American tribes
under trademark law. The USPTO
conducted the study and presented a
report to the House and Senate Judiciary
Committees on November 30, 1999. One
of the recommendations made in the
report was that the USPTO create and
maintain an accurate and
comprehensive database containing the
official insignia of all federally- and
State-recognized Native American
tribes. In accordance with this
recommendation, the Senate Committee
on Appropriations directed the USPTO
to create this database.
The USPTO database of official tribal
insignias assists trademark attorneys in
their examination of applications for
trademark registration. Additionally, the
database provides evidence of what a
federally- or State-recognized Native
American tribe considers to be its
official insignia. The database serves as
a reference for examining attorneys
when determining the registrability of a
mark that may falsely suggest a
connection to the official insignia of a
Native American tribe. The database is
also available to the public on the
USPTO Web site.
Tribes are not required to request that
their official insignia be included in the
database. The entry of an official
insignia into the database does not
confer any rights to the tribe that
submitted the insignia, and entry is not
the legal equivalent of registering the
insignia as a trademark under 15 U.S.C.
1051 et seq. The inclusion of an official
tribal insignia in the database does not
create any legal presumption of validity
or priority, does not carry any of the
benefits of Federal trademark
registration, and is not a determination
as to whether a particular insignia
would be refused registration as a
trademark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051
et seq.
Requests from federally-recognized
tribes to enter an official insignia into
the database must be submitted in
writing and include: (1) A depiction of
the insignia, including the name of the
tribe and the address for
correspondence; (2) a copy of the tribal
resolution adopting the insignia in
question as the official insignia of the
tribe; and (3) a statement, signed by an
official with authority to bind the tribe,
confirming that the insignia included
with the request is identical to the
official insignia adopted by the tribal
resolution.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65611
Requests from State-recognized tribes
must also be in writing and include
each of the three items described above
that are submitted by federallyrecognized tribes. Additionally, requests
from State-recognized tribes must
include either: (a) A document issued
by a State official that evidences the
State’s determination that the entity is a
Native American tribe; or (b) a citation
to a State statute designating the entity
as a Native American tribe. The USPTO
enters insignia that have been properly
submitted by federally- or Staterecognized Native American tribes into
the database and does not investigate
whether the insignia is actually the
official insignia of the tribe making the
request.
This collection includes the
information needed by the USPTO to
enter an official insignia for a federallyor State-recognized Native American
tribe into a database of such insignia. No
forms are associated with this
collection.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to
the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0048.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 8
responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that a federally- or
State-recognized Native American tribe
will require an average of 30 minutes
(0.5 hours) to complete a request to
record an official insignia, including
time to prepare the appropriate
documents and submit the completed
request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 5. hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $325. The USPTO expects
that the information in this collection
will be prepared by both
paraprofessionals and administrative
staff. The estimated rate of $65 per hour
used in this submission is an average of
the paraprofessional rate of $100 per
hour and the administrative rate of $30
per hour. Using this rate of $65 per
hour, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for submitting
the information in this collection will be
$325 per year.
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
65612
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices
Estimated
time for
response
(minutes)
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
Request to Record an Official Insignia of a Federally-Recognized Tribe .....................................................
Request to Record an Official Insignia of a State-Recognized Tribe ...........................................................
30
30
5
3
3
2
Totals ......................................................................................................................................................
..................
8
5
Item
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $8. There are
no capital start-up, maintenance, or
recordkeeping costs associated with this
information collection. There are also
no filing fees for submitting a tribal
insignia for recording. However, this
collection does have annual (non-hour)
costs in the form of postage costs.
Customers may incur postage costs
when submitting the information in this
collection to the USPTO by mail. The
USPTO estimates that the average firstclass postage cost for a submission
mailed through the U.S. Postal Service
will be $1.05 and that up to 8
submissions will be mailed to the
USPTO per year. Therefore, the total
non-hour respondent cost burden for
this collection in the form of postage
costs is approximately $8 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–26975 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:09 Oct 25, 2010
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 61–2010]
Foreign-Trade Zone 102—St. Louis,
MO; Application for Reorganization
Under Alternative Site Framework
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board
(the Board) by the St. Louis County Port
Authority, grantee of FTZ 102,
requesting authority to reorganize the
zone under the alternative site
framework (ASF) adopted by the Board
(74 FR 1170, 1/12/09; correction 74 FR
3987, 1/22/09). The ASF is an option for
grantees for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones
and can permit significantly greater
flexibility in the designation of new
‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/
users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service
area’’ in the context of the Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
a general-purpose zone project. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the
regulations of the Board (15 CFR part
400). It was formally filed on October
19, 2010.
FTZ 102 was approved by the Board
on April 27, 1984 (Board Order 251, 49
FR 19540, 5/8/84), and expanded on
March 3, 1987 (Board Order 344, 52 FR
7915, 3/13/87) and on January 30, 2009
(Board Order 1604, 74 FR 6364, 2/9/09).
The current zone project includes the
following sites: Site 1 (11.13 acres)—
Metro International Trade Services,
LLC, warehouse, 3901 Union Boulevard,
St. Louis; Site 2 (492.086 acres)—
NorthPark industrial park located at the
northeast corner of Interstates 70 and
170 in the municipalities of Berkeley,
Ferguson and Kinloch; and, Site 3—
consisting of three parcels located at
and adjacent to the Lambert-St. Louis
International Airport: Hazelwood
Commerce Center (Site 3A—169.76
acres) located on Commerce Center
Drive in Hazelwood; Lindbergh
Distribution Center (Site 3B—25.848
acres) located at 5801 N. Lindbergh
Boulevard in Hazelwood; and, Airport
Property No. 1 (Site 3C—75.99 acres)
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
located at 5620 Banshee Road in St.
Louis.
The grantee’s proposed service area
under the ASF would be the City of St.
Louis and St. Louis County, Missouri. If
approved, the grantee would be able to
serve sites throughout the service area
based on companies’ needs for FTZ
designation. The proposed service area
is within and adjacent to the St. Louis
Customs and Border Protection port of
entry.
The applicant is requesting authority
to reorganize its existing zone project
under the ASF as follows: renumber the
parcels of Site 3 (Site 3A would become
Site 3; Site 3B would become Site 4;
and, Site 3C would become Site 5); Sites
2, 3, 4 and 5 would become ‘‘magnet’’
sites; and, Site 1 would become a
‘‘usage-driven’’ site. The ASF allows for
the possible exemption of one magnet
site from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits that
generally apply to sites under the ASF,
and the applicant proposes that Site 2
be so exempted. Because the ASF only
pertains to establishing or reorganizing
a general-purpose zone, the application
would have no impact on FTZ 102’s
authorized subzones.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate
and analyze the facts and information
presented in the application and case
record and to report findings and
recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is December 27, 2010.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to January 10,
2011.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading
Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site,
which is accessible via https://
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65611-65612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26975]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Native American Tribal Insignia Database
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 27,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0048 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Sharon Marsh, Deputy Commissioner for Trademark
Examination Policy, Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA
22313-1451, by telephone at 571-272-8900, or by e-mail to
Sharon.Marsh@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Trademark Law Treaty Implementation Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-
330, Sec. 302, 112 Stat. 3071) required the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) to study issues surrounding the protection of
the official insignia of federally- and State-recognized Native
American tribes under trademark law. The USPTO conducted the study and
presented a report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on
November 30, 1999. One of the recommendations made in the report was
that the USPTO create and maintain an accurate and comprehensive
database containing the official insignia of all federally- and State-
recognized Native American tribes. In accordance with this
recommendation, the Senate Committee on Appropriations directed the
USPTO to create this database.
The USPTO database of official tribal insignias assists trademark
attorneys in their examination of applications for trademark
registration. Additionally, the database provides evidence of what a
federally- or State-recognized Native American tribe considers to be
its official insignia. The database serves as a reference for examining
attorneys when determining the registrability of a mark that may
falsely suggest a connection to the official insignia of a Native
American tribe. The database is also available to the public on the
USPTO Web site.
Tribes are not required to request that their official insignia be
included in the database. The entry of an official insignia into the
database does not confer any rights to the tribe that submitted the
insignia, and entry is not the legal equivalent of registering the
insignia as a trademark under 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. The inclusion of
an official tribal insignia in the database does not create any legal
presumption of validity or priority, does not carry any of the benefits
of Federal trademark registration, and is not a determination as to
whether a particular insignia would be refused registration as a
trademark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.
Requests from federally-recognized tribes to enter an official
insignia into the database must be submitted in writing and include:
(1) A depiction of the insignia, including the name of the tribe and
the address for correspondence; (2) a copy of the tribal resolution
adopting the insignia in question as the official insignia of the
tribe; and (3) a statement, signed by an official with authority to
bind the tribe, confirming that the insignia included with the request
is identical to the official insignia adopted by the tribal resolution.
Requests from State-recognized tribes must also be in writing and
include each of the three items described above that are submitted by
federally-recognized tribes. Additionally, requests from State-
recognized tribes must include either: (a) A document issued by a State
official that evidences the State's determination that the entity is a
Native American tribe; or (b) a citation to a State statute designating
the entity as a Native American tribe. The USPTO enters insignia that
have been properly submitted by federally- or State-recognized Native
American tribes into the database and does not investigate whether the
insignia is actually the official insignia of the tribe making the
request.
This collection includes the information needed by the USPTO to
enter an official insignia for a federally- or State-recognized Native
American tribe into a database of such insignia. No forms are
associated with this collection.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0048.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 8 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that a federally-
or State-recognized Native American tribe will require an average of 30
minutes (0.5 hours) to complete a request to record an official
insignia, including time to prepare the appropriate documents and
submit the completed request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 5. hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $325. The USPTO
expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by
both paraprofessionals and administrative staff. The estimated rate of
$65 per hour used in this submission is an average of the
paraprofessional rate of $100 per hour and the administrative rate of
$30 per hour. Using this rate of $65 per hour, the USPTO estimates that
the respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this
collection will be $325 per year.
[[Page 65612]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
time for Estimated annual
Item response annual burden
(minutes) responses hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request to Record an Official 30 5 3
Insignia of a Federally-Recognized
Tribe..............................
Request to Record an Official 30 3 2
Insignia of a State-Recognized
Tribe..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals.......................... .......... 8 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $8. There
are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs associated
with this information collection. There are also no filing fees for
submitting a tribal insignia for recording. However, this collection
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs.
Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information
in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the
average first-class postage cost for a submission mailed through the
U.S. Postal Service will be $1.05 and that up to 8 submissions will be
mailed to the USPTO per year. Therefore, the total non-hour respondent
cost burden for this collection in the form of postage costs is
approximately $8 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26975 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P