Native American Tribal Insignia Database, 65611-65612 [2010-26975]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address. The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA. Dated in Washington, DC, October 21, 2010. Peter Minarik, Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. [FR Doc. 2010–26996 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office Native American Tribal Insignia Database ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 27, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • E-mail: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0048 comment’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the attention of Susan Fawcett. • Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. • Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Sharon Marsh, Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313– 1451, by telephone at 571–272–8900, or by e-mail to Sharon.Marsh@uspto.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: I. Abstract The Trademark Law Treaty Implementation Act of 1998 (Pub. L. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Oct 25, 2010 Jkt 223001 105–330, § 302, 112 Stat. 3071) required the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to study issues surrounding the protection of the official insignia of federally- and Staterecognized Native American tribes under trademark law. The USPTO conducted the study and presented a report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on November 30, 1999. One of the recommendations made in the report was that the USPTO create and maintain an accurate and comprehensive database containing the official insignia of all federally- and State-recognized Native American tribes. In accordance with this recommendation, the Senate Committee on Appropriations directed the USPTO to create this database. The USPTO database of official tribal insignias assists trademark attorneys in their examination of applications for trademark registration. Additionally, the database provides evidence of what a federally- or State-recognized Native American tribe considers to be its official insignia. The database serves as a reference for examining attorneys when determining the registrability of a mark that may falsely suggest a connection to the official insignia of a Native American tribe. The database is also available to the public on the USPTO Web site. Tribes are not required to request that their official insignia be included in the database. The entry of an official insignia into the database does not confer any rights to the tribe that submitted the insignia, and entry is not the legal equivalent of registering the insignia as a trademark under 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. The inclusion of an official tribal insignia in the database does not create any legal presumption of validity or priority, does not carry any of the benefits of Federal trademark registration, and is not a determination as to whether a particular insignia would be refused registration as a trademark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. Requests from federally-recognized tribes to enter an official insignia into the database must be submitted in writing and include: (1) A depiction of the insignia, including the name of the tribe and the address for correspondence; (2) a copy of the tribal resolution adopting the insignia in question as the official insignia of the tribe; and (3) a statement, signed by an official with authority to bind the tribe, confirming that the insignia included with the request is identical to the official insignia adopted by the tribal resolution. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65611 Requests from State-recognized tribes must also be in writing and include each of the three items described above that are submitted by federallyrecognized tribes. Additionally, requests from State-recognized tribes must include either: (a) A document issued by a State official that evidences the State’s determination that the entity is a Native American tribe; or (b) a citation to a State statute designating the entity as a Native American tribe. The USPTO enters insignia that have been properly submitted by federally- or Staterecognized Native American tribes into the database and does not investigate whether the insignia is actually the official insignia of the tribe making the request. This collection includes the information needed by the USPTO to enter an official insignia for a federallyor State-recognized Native American tribe into a database of such insignia. No forms are associated with this collection. II. Method of Collection By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO. III. Data OMB Number: 0651–0048. Form Number(s): None. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Affected Public: Tribal governments. Estimated Number of Respondents: 8 responses per year. Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that a federally- or State-recognized Native American tribe will require an average of 30 minutes (0.5 hours) to complete a request to record an official insignia, including time to prepare the appropriate documents and submit the completed request to the USPTO. Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 5. hours. Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $325. The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by both paraprofessionals and administrative staff. The estimated rate of $65 per hour used in this submission is an average of the paraprofessional rate of $100 per hour and the administrative rate of $30 per hour. Using this rate of $65 per hour, the USPTO estimates that the respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this collection will be $325 per year. E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 65612 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices Estimated time for response (minutes) Estimated annual responses Estimated annual burden hours Request to Record an Official Insignia of a Federally-Recognized Tribe ..................................................... Request to Record an Official Insignia of a State-Recognized Tribe ........................................................... 30 30 5 3 3 2 Totals ...................................................................................................................................................... .................. 8 5 Item Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $8. There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection. There are also no filing fees for submitting a tribal insignia for recording. However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs. Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the average firstclass postage cost for a submission mailed through the U.S. Postal Service will be $1.05 and that up to 8 submissions will be mailed to the USPTO per year. Therefore, the total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in the form of postage costs is approximately $8 per year. IV. Request for Comments emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: October 20, 2010. Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2010–26975 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Oct 25, 2010 Jkt 223001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Docket 61–2010] Foreign-Trade Zone 102—St. Louis, MO; Application for Reorganization Under Alternative Site Framework An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) by the St. Louis County Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 102, requesting authority to reorganize the zone under the alternative site framework (ASF) adopted by the Board (74 FR 1170, 1/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 1/22/09). The ASF is an option for grantees for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones and can permit significantly greater flexibility in the designation of new ‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/ users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’ in the context of the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for a general-purpose zone project. The application was submitted pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed on October 19, 2010. FTZ 102 was approved by the Board on April 27, 1984 (Board Order 251, 49 FR 19540, 5/8/84), and expanded on March 3, 1987 (Board Order 344, 52 FR 7915, 3/13/87) and on January 30, 2009 (Board Order 1604, 74 FR 6364, 2/9/09). The current zone project includes the following sites: Site 1 (11.13 acres)— Metro International Trade Services, LLC, warehouse, 3901 Union Boulevard, St. Louis; Site 2 (492.086 acres)— NorthPark industrial park located at the northeast corner of Interstates 70 and 170 in the municipalities of Berkeley, Ferguson and Kinloch; and, Site 3— consisting of three parcels located at and adjacent to the Lambert-St. Louis International Airport: Hazelwood Commerce Center (Site 3A—169.76 acres) located on Commerce Center Drive in Hazelwood; Lindbergh Distribution Center (Site 3B—25.848 acres) located at 5801 N. Lindbergh Boulevard in Hazelwood; and, Airport Property No. 1 (Site 3C—75.99 acres) PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 located at 5620 Banshee Road in St. Louis. The grantee’s proposed service area under the ASF would be the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County, Missouri. If approved, the grantee would be able to serve sites throughout the service area based on companies’ needs for FTZ designation. The proposed service area is within and adjacent to the St. Louis Customs and Border Protection port of entry. The applicant is requesting authority to reorganize its existing zone project under the ASF as follows: renumber the parcels of Site 3 (Site 3A would become Site 3; Site 3B would become Site 4; and, Site 3C would become Site 5); Sites 2, 3, 4 and 5 would become ‘‘magnet’’ sites; and, Site 1 would become a ‘‘usage-driven’’ site. The ASF allows for the possible exemption of one magnet site from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits that generally apply to sites under the ASF, and the applicant proposes that Site 2 be so exempted. Because the ASF only pertains to establishing or reorganizing a general-purpose zone, the application would have no impact on FTZ 102’s authorized subzones. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to evaluate and analyze the facts and information presented in the application and case record and to report findings and recommendations to the Board. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is December 27, 2010. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to January 10, 2011. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via https:// www.trade.gov/ftz. For further E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65611-65612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office


Native American Tribal Insignia Database

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 27, 
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     E-mail: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0048 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan 
Fawcett.
     Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Sharon Marsh, Deputy Commissioner for Trademark 
Examination Policy, Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks, United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 
22313-1451, by telephone at 571-272-8900, or by e-mail to 
Sharon.Marsh@uspto.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

    The Trademark Law Treaty Implementation Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-
330, Sec.  302, 112 Stat. 3071) required the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office (USPTO) to study issues surrounding the protection of 
the official insignia of federally- and State-recognized Native 
American tribes under trademark law. The USPTO conducted the study and 
presented a report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on 
November 30, 1999. One of the recommendations made in the report was 
that the USPTO create and maintain an accurate and comprehensive 
database containing the official insignia of all federally- and State-
recognized Native American tribes. In accordance with this 
recommendation, the Senate Committee on Appropriations directed the 
USPTO to create this database.
    The USPTO database of official tribal insignias assists trademark 
attorneys in their examination of applications for trademark 
registration. Additionally, the database provides evidence of what a 
federally- or State-recognized Native American tribe considers to be 
its official insignia. The database serves as a reference for examining 
attorneys when determining the registrability of a mark that may 
falsely suggest a connection to the official insignia of a Native 
American tribe. The database is also available to the public on the 
USPTO Web site.
    Tribes are not required to request that their official insignia be 
included in the database. The entry of an official insignia into the 
database does not confer any rights to the tribe that submitted the 
insignia, and entry is not the legal equivalent of registering the 
insignia as a trademark under 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. The inclusion of 
an official tribal insignia in the database does not create any legal 
presumption of validity or priority, does not carry any of the benefits 
of Federal trademark registration, and is not a determination as to 
whether a particular insignia would be refused registration as a 
trademark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.
    Requests from federally-recognized tribes to enter an official 
insignia into the database must be submitted in writing and include: 
(1) A depiction of the insignia, including the name of the tribe and 
the address for correspondence; (2) a copy of the tribal resolution 
adopting the insignia in question as the official insignia of the 
tribe; and (3) a statement, signed by an official with authority to 
bind the tribe, confirming that the insignia included with the request 
is identical to the official insignia adopted by the tribal resolution.
    Requests from State-recognized tribes must also be in writing and 
include each of the three items described above that are submitted by 
federally-recognized tribes. Additionally, requests from State-
recognized tribes must include either: (a) A document issued by a State 
official that evidences the State's determination that the entity is a 
Native American tribe; or (b) a citation to a State statute designating 
the entity as a Native American tribe. The USPTO enters insignia that 
have been properly submitted by federally- or State-recognized Native 
American tribes into the database and does not investigate whether the 
insignia is actually the official insignia of the tribe making the 
request.
    This collection includes the information needed by the USPTO to 
enter an official insignia for a federally- or State-recognized Native 
American tribe into a database of such insignia. No forms are 
associated with this collection.

II. Method of Collection

    By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO.

III. Data

    OMB Number: 0651-0048.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Tribal governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8 responses per year.
    Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that a federally- 
or State-recognized Native American tribe will require an average of 30 
minutes (0.5 hours) to complete a request to record an official 
insignia, including time to prepare the appropriate documents and 
submit the completed request to the USPTO.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 5. hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $325. The USPTO 
expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by 
both paraprofessionals and administrative staff. The estimated rate of 
$65 per hour used in this submission is an average of the 
paraprofessional rate of $100 per hour and the administrative rate of 
$30 per hour. Using this rate of $65 per hour, the USPTO estimates that 
the respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this 
collection will be $325 per year.

[[Page 65612]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Estimated               Estimated
                                       time for    Estimated    annual
                Item                   response     annual      burden
                                       (minutes)   responses     hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request to Record an Official                 30           5           3
 Insignia of a Federally-Recognized
 Tribe..............................
Request to Record an Official                 30           3           2
 Insignia of a State-Recognized
 Tribe..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Totals..........................  ..........           8           5
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $8. There 
are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs associated 
with this information collection. There are also no filing fees for 
submitting a tribal insignia for recording. However, this collection 
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs.
    Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information 
in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the 
average first-class postage cost for a submission mailed through the 
U.S. Postal Service will be $1.05 and that up to 8 submissions will be 
mailed to the USPTO per year. Therefore, the total non-hour respondent 
cost burden for this collection in the form of postage costs is 
approximately $8 per year.

IV. Request for Comments

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden 
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; 
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or 
included in the request for OMB approval of this information 
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.

    Dated: October 20, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26975 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.