Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; Proposed 2011-2013 Fishing Quotas for Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog, 65442-65445 [2010-26940]
Download as PDF
65442
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 205
Monday, October 25, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
On page 62736, in the first column,
eight lines from the bottom;
On page 62736, in the first column,
three lines from the bottom;
On page 62736, in the second column,
two lines from the top; and
On page 62736, in the second column,
six lines from the top.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Dated: October 19, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
17 CFR Parts 229, 240, and 249
[FR Doc. 2010–26810 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
[Release Nos. 33–9148A; 34–63029A; File
No. S7–24–10]
RIN 3235–AK75
Disclosure for Asset-Backed Securities
Required by Section 943 of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Securities and Exchange
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of October 13,
2010, concerning Disclosure for AssetBacked Securities Required by Section
943 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
The document contained an incorrect
reference to § 249.1300. This correction
is being published to correct the
reference.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rolaine Bancroft, Attorney-Advisor, in
the Office of Rulemaking, at (202) 551–
3430, Division of Corporation Finance,
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–3628 or, with
respect to proposed Rule 17g–7, Joseph
I. Levinson, Special Counsel, at (202)
551–5598; Division of Trading and
Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–3628.
WReier-Aviles on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Correction
In the Federal Register of October 13,
2010, in FR Doc. 2010–25361, the
reference ‘‘249.1300’’ is corrected to read
‘‘249.1400’’ in the following places:
On page 62719, in footnote 7 in the
first column, two lines from the bottom;
On page 62735, in the first column,
two lines from the top;
On page 62736, in the first column,
thirty-one lines from the top;
14:15 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R06–RCRA–2009–0343; FRL–9217–1]
New Mexico: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The State of New Mexico has
applied to EPA for Final authorization
of the changes to its hazardous waste
program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
EPA proposes to grant Final
Authorization to the State of New
Mexico. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
authorizing the changes by an
immediate final rule. EPA did not make
a proposal prior to the immediate final
rule because we believe this action is
not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it. We have
explained the reasons for this
authorization in the preamble to the
immediate final rule. Unless we get
written comments which oppose this
authorization during the comment
period, the immediate final rule will
become effective on the date it
establishes, and we will not take further
action on this proposal. If we receive
comments that oppose this action, we
will withdraw the immediate final rule
and it will not take effect. We will then
respond to public comments in a later
final rule based on this proposal. You
may not have another opportunity for
comment. If you want to comment on
this action, you must do so at this time.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Send your written comments by
November 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD–O),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, at the address shown below.
You can examine copies of the materials
submitted by the State of New Mexico
during normal business hours at the
following locations: New Mexico
Environment Department, 2905 Rodeo
Park Drive East, Building 1, Santa Fe,
New Mexico 87505–6303, phone
number (505) 476–6035 and EPA,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733, phone number (214)
665–8533, comments may also be
submitted electronically or through
hand delivery/courier; please follow the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES
section of the immediate final rule
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alima Patterson (214) 665–8533.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
additional information, please see the
immediate final rule published in the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register.
DATES:
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010–26961 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 101013504–0504–02]
RIN 0648–XY27
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery;
Proposed 2011–2013 Fishing Quotas
for Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean
Quahog
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
65443
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
NMFS proposes quotas for the
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fisheries for 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Regulations governing these fisheries
require NMFS to publish the proposed
quota specifications for the 2011–2013
fishing years and seek public comment
on such proposed measures. The intent
of this action is to propose allowable
harvest levels of Atlantic surfclams and
ocean quahogs from the Exclusive
Economic Zone to prevent overfishing
and to allow harvesting of optimum
yield (OY).
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than 5 p.m., eastern standard time,
on November 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, including the
Environmental Assessment, Regulatory
Impact Review (RIR), and Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
are available from Christopher Moore,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, Suite 201,
800 N. State St., Dover, DE 19901. A
copy of the EA/RIR/IRFA is accessible
via the Internet at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/
com.html.
You may submit comments, identified
by RIN 0648–XY27, by any one of the
following methods:
Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark on the
outside of the envelope, ‘‘Comments on
2011–2013 SC/OQ Proposed
Specifications.’’
Fax: (978) 281–9135.
Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and
generally will be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Macan, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
fishery management plan (FMP) for
Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs
requires that NMFS, in consultation
with the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council), specify
quotas for surfclam and ocean quahog
for a 3-year period, with an annual
review, from a range that represents the
OY for each fishery. It is the policy of
the Council that the levels selected
allow sustainable fishing to continue at
that level for at least 10 years for
surfclams, and 30 years for ocean
quahogs. In addition to this constraint,
the Council policy also considers the
economic impacts of the quotas.
Regulations implementing Amendment
10 to the FMP (63 FR 27481, May 19,
1998) added Maine ocean quahogs
(locally known as Maine mahogany
quahogs) to the management unit, and
provided for a small artisanal fishery for
ocean quahogs in the waters north of
43°50′ N. lat., with an annual quota
within a range of 17,000 to 100,000
Maine bu (5,991 to 35,240 hL). As
specified in Amendment 10, the Maine
mahogany ocean quahog quota is
allocated separately from the quota
specified for the ocean quahog fishery.
Regulations implementing Amendment
13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December
16, 2003) established the ability to set
multi-year quotas. An evaluation, in the
form of an annual quota
recommendation, is conducted by the
Council every year to determine if the
multi-year quota specifications remains
appropriate. The fishing quotas must be
in compliance with overfishing
definitions for each species. In
recommending these quotas, the
Council considered the most recent
stock assessments, data reported by
harvesters and processors, and other
relevant information concerning
exploitable biomass and spawning
biomass, fishing mortality rates, stock
recruitment, projected fishing effort and
catches, and areas closed to fishing.
In June 2010, the Council voted to
recommend maintaining the 2010 quota
levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million
L) for the ocean quahog fishery, 3.400
million bu (181 million L) for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, and 100,000
Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine
ocean quahog fishery for 2011–2013.
The proposed quotas for the 2011–2013
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fishery are shown in the table below.
The Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
quotas are specified in ‘‘industry’’ bu of
53.24 L per bu, while the Maine ocean
quahog quota is specified in ‘‘Maine’’ bu
of 35.24 L per bu. Because Maine ocean
quahogs are the same species as ocean
quahogs, both fisheries are assessed
under the same ocean quahog
overfishing definition. When the two
quota amounts (ocean quahog and
Maine ocean quahog) are added, the
total allowable harvest is still lower
than the level that would result in
overfishing for the entire stock.
PROPOSED 2011–2013 ATLANTIC SURFCLAM AND OCEAN QUAHOG1 QUOTAS
2011
bu
Surfclams 2
...............................................
Ocean Quahogs 2 .....................................
Maine Ocean Quahogs 3 ..........................
2012
hL
3.400
5.333
100,000
bu
1.810
2.840
35,240
2013
hL
3.400
5.333
100,000
bu
1.810
2.840
35,240
3.400
5.333
100,000
hL
1.810
2.840
35,240
WReier-Aviles on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
1 Numerical
values are in millions except for Maine ocean quahogs.
bu = 1.88 cubic ft. = 53.24 liters.
3 1 bu = 1.2445 cubic ft. = 35.24 liters.
21
Surfclams
The proposed 2011–2013 status quo
surfclam quota was developed after
reviewing the results of the Northeast
Regional Stock Assessment Workshop
(SAW) 49 for Atlantic surfclam, released
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:15 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
to the public in February 2010. The
surfclam quota recommendation is
consistent with the SAW 49 finding that
the Atlantic surfclam stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
Estimated fishable stock biomass in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2008 was above the management target,
and fishing mortality was below the
management threshold. Although
recruitment, growth rate, and biomass
have continued to decline in the
southern region (NJ and Delmarva),
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
65444
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
relative to historic conditions, these
declines are offset by an increase in
biomass and recruitment on Georges
Bank and off Long Island, NY. Based on
this information, the Council
recommended, and NMFS is proposing,
to maintain the status quo surfclam
quota of 3.4 million bu (181 million L)
for 2011–2013. This quota represents
the maximum allowable quota under the
FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
The proposed 2011–2013 quota for
ocean quahogs also reflects the status
quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284
million L) in 2010. SAW 48, released to
the public in August 2009, found that
the ocean quahog stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
Estimated fishable biomass in 2008 was
above the management target, and
estimated fishing mortality was
significantly below the target level.
Fishing mortality is not expected to
reach the threshold if the proposed
quota is harvested each of the 3 years.
Ocean quahog is an unproductive stock
that is being fished down from its prefishery level; however, after several
decades of relatively low fishing
mortality, the stock is still above the
biomass target reference points. In fact,
the stock biomass is still at 81 percent
of the pre-fishing level. Based on this
information, the Council recommended,
and NMFS is proposing, to maintain the
status quo quota of 5.333 million bu
(284 million L) for 2011–2013. This
quota level may be above current market
demand, but allows for market growth,
should conditions change.
The proposed 2011–2013 quota for
Maine ocean quahogs is the status quo
level of 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL).
In 2008, the State of Maine completed
a stock assessment of the resource
within the Maine Mahogany Quahog
Zone. This assessment was peerreviewed as part of SAW 48. The
findings of the Maine quahog survey did
not change the status of the entire ocean
quahog resource. The proposed quota
represents the maximum allowable
quota under the FMP.
WReier-Aviles on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and
other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This action is authorized by 50 CFR part
648 and has been determined to be not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:15 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has
been prepared, which describes the
economic impacts that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small
entities. A summary of the IRFA is
included in this section. The complete
IRFA and regulatory impact review is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). A description of the
reasons why this action is being
considered, as well as the objectives of
and legal basis for this proposed rule is
found in the preamble of this proposed
rule. There are no Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
proposed rule.
This action proposes fishing quotas
for Atlantic surfclams and ocean
quahogs for 2011–2013. The Council
analyzed four quota alternatives for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, five
alternatives for the ocean quahog
fishery, and four alternatives for the
Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of the
alternative sets included the proposed
alternative and a ‘‘no action’’ alternative.
The three proposed quotas for 2011–
2013 are 5.333 million bu (284 million
L) for the ocean quahog fishery, 3.400
million bu (181 million L) for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, and 100,000
Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine
ocean quahog fishery.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) defines a small commercial
fishing entity as a firm with gross
annual receipts not exceeding $4
million. In 2009, a total of 43 vessels
reported harvesting surfclams and/or
ocean quahogs from Federal waters
under the Individual Fishing Quota
(IFQ) system. In addition, 19 vessels
participated in the limited access Maine
ocean quahog fishery, for a total of 62
participants in the 2009 fisheries.
Average 2009 gross income from
surfclam IFQ trips was $833,333 per
vessel, and from ocean quahog IFQ trips
was $1,533,333 per vessel. The Maine
ocean quahog fishery reported an
average value of $105,263 per vessel.
Each vessel in this analysis is treated as
a single entity for purposes of size
determination and impact assessment.
All 62 commercial fishing entities fall
below the SBA size threshold for small
commercial fishing entities.
In addition to the active vessels that
participate in the fishery there are 45
ocean quahog quota IFQ allocation
holders, 57 surfclam allocation holders,
and 40 Federal limited access Maine
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mahogany quahog permit holders. An
allocation holder may choose to fish or
lease his or her quota allocation.
Economic Impacts of This Proposed
Action
The proposed quotas for 2011–2013
reflect the same quota levels set for
2008–2010. Therefore, it is not expected
that there will be any different
economic impacts beyond status quo
resulting from the proposed quota level.
Leaving the ocean quahog quota at the
harvest level of 5.333 million bu (284
million L) is not expected to constrain
the fishery. In fact, actual ocean quahog
landings for 2008 and 2009 were
approximately 65 percent of the
available quota. The total 2010 harvest
is expected to be similar to recent years
(as of September 30, 2010, only 47.6
percent of the quota had been harvested,
a level slightly less than on this date in
2009). The surfclam quota is proposed
to be set to the maximum allowed under
the FMP.
In contrast to the ocean quahog
harvest, the surfclam fishery has
harvested over 80 percent of the
available quota each year since 2005,
except for 2009, where 69 percent of the
quota was landed. As of September 30,
2010, only 47.7 percent of the quota has
been harvested for FY 2010, a level
slightly less than on this date in 2009.
The Maine ocean quahog quota is
proposed to be set at the maximum
allowed under the FMP (100,000 Maine
bu; 35,240 hL). It is anticipated that by
maintaining the status quo quota level
for the next 3 years, the fishing industry
will benefit from the stability of product
demand from the seafood processors
and being able to predict future fishery
performance based on past performance
from the last 3 years.
Economic Impacts of Alternatives to the
Proposed Action
The Council analyzed four
alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, five alternatives for the ocean
quahog fishery, and four alternatives for
the Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of
the alternative sets included the
proposed alternative and a ‘‘no action’’
alternative. The selection of ‘‘no action’’
alternative would result in no quotas
being established, a closure of the
fishery, and is contrary to the FMP.
Based on 2009 ex-vessel prices, the
result of no Federal surfclam or ocean
quahog harvests in 2011 would be a loss
of $30 million to the Federal surfclam
fishery, $23 million to the ocean quahog
fishery, and $2 million to the Maine
ocean quahog fishery, for a total loss of
$55 million. The viable alternatives to
the proposed quotas for ocean quahog
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
that are permissible under the FMP and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act include a
20-percent decrease from the status quo,
a 6.2-percent decrease from the status
quo, and a 20-percent increase from the
status quo; therefore, there are no
significant alternatives that would
reduce economic impacts on the
regulated entities.
The alternatives to the proposed
surfclam quotas that are permissible
under the FMP and the MagnusonStevens Act include a 45.6-percent
decrease from the status quo and a
4.4-percent decrease from the status
quo; therefore, there are no significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:15 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
alternatives that would reduce
economic impacts on the regulated
entities.
The alternatives to the proposed
Maine ocean quahog quota that are
permissible under the FMP and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act include a 50percent decrease from the status quo
and a 10-percent decrease from the
status quo; therefore, there are no
significant alternatives that would
reduce economic impacts on the
regulated entities.
PO 00000
65445
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements
This proposed rule would not impose
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements.
Therefore, the costs of compliance
would remain unchanged.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–26940 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65442-65445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26940]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 101013504-0504-02]
RIN 0648-XY27
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; Proposed 2011-2013 Fishing Quotas
for Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 65443]]
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes quotas for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean
quahog fisheries for 2011, 2012, and 2013. Regulations governing these
fisheries require NMFS to publish the proposed quota specifications for
the 2011-2013 fishing years and seek public comment on such proposed
measures. The intent of this action is to propose allowable harvest
levels of Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs from the Exclusive
Economic Zone to prevent overfishing and to allow harvesting of optimum
yield (OY).
DATES: Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., eastern standard
time, on November 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents, including the Environmental
Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) are available from Christopher Moore,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201,
800 N. State St., Dover, DE 19901. A copy of the EA/RIR/IRFA is
accessible via the Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/com.html.
You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-XY27, by any one of
the following methods:
Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark on the
outside of the envelope, ``Comments on 2011-2013 SC/OQ Proposed
Specifications.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135.
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal, https://www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and generally will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Macan, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978-281-9165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fishery management plan (FMP) for
Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs requires that NMFS, in
consultation with the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
(Council), specify quotas for surfclam and ocean quahog for a 3-year
period, with an annual review, from a range that represents the OY for
each fishery. It is the policy of the Council that the levels selected
allow sustainable fishing to continue at that level for at least 10
years for surfclams, and 30 years for ocean quahogs. In addition to
this constraint, the Council policy also considers the economic impacts
of the quotas. Regulations implementing Amendment 10 to the FMP (63 FR
27481, May 19, 1998) added Maine ocean quahogs (locally known as Maine
mahogany quahogs) to the management unit, and provided for a small
artisanal fishery for ocean quahogs in the waters north of 43[deg]50'
N. lat., with an annual quota within a range of 17,000 to 100,000 Maine
bu (5,991 to 35,240 hL). As specified in Amendment 10, the Maine
mahogany ocean quahog quota is allocated separately from the quota
specified for the ocean quahog fishery. Regulations implementing
Amendment 13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December 16, 2003) established
the ability to set multi-year quotas. An evaluation, in the form of an
annual quota recommendation, is conducted by the Council every year to
determine if the multi-year quota specifications remains appropriate.
The fishing quotas must be in compliance with overfishing definitions
for each species. In recommending these quotas, the Council considered
the most recent stock assessments, data reported by harvesters and
processors, and other relevant information concerning exploitable
biomass and spawning biomass, fishing mortality rates, stock
recruitment, projected fishing effort and catches, and areas closed to
fishing.
In June 2010, the Council voted to recommend maintaining the 2010
quota levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for the ocean quahog
fishery, 3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, and 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine ocean quahog
fishery for 2011-2013. The proposed quotas for the 2011-2013 Atlantic
surfclam and ocean quahog fishery are shown in the table below. The
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog quotas are specified in ``industry''
bu of 53.24 L per bu, while the Maine ocean quahog quota is specified
in ``Maine'' bu of 35.24 L per bu. Because Maine ocean quahogs are the
same species as ocean quahogs, both fisheries are assessed under the
same ocean quahog overfishing definition. When the two quota amounts
(ocean quahog and Maine ocean quahog) are added, the total allowable
harvest is still lower than the level that would result in overfishing
for the entire stock.
Proposed 2011-2013 Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog\1\ Quotas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 2012 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bu hL bu hL bu hL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surfclams \2\........................................... 3.400 1.810 3.400 1.810 3.400 1.810
Ocean Quahogs \2\....................................... 5.333 2.840 5.333 2.840 5.333 2.840
Maine Ocean Quahogs \3\................................. 100,000 35,240 100,000 35,240 100,000 35,240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Numerical values are in millions except for Maine ocean quahogs.
\2\ 1 bu = 1.88 cubic ft. = 53.24 liters.
\3\ 1 bu = 1.2445 cubic ft. = 35.24 liters.
Surfclams
The proposed 2011-2013 status quo surfclam quota was developed
after reviewing the results of the Northeast Regional Stock Assessment
Workshop (SAW) 49 for Atlantic surfclam, released to the public in
February 2010. The surfclam quota recommendation is consistent with the
SAW 49 finding that the Atlantic surfclam stock is not overfished, nor
is overfishing occurring. Estimated fishable stock biomass in 2008 was
above the management target, and fishing mortality was below the
management threshold. Although recruitment, growth rate, and biomass
have continued to decline in the southern region (NJ and Delmarva),
[[Page 65444]]
relative to historic conditions, these declines are offset by an
increase in biomass and recruitment on Georges Bank and off Long
Island, NY. Based on this information, the Council recommended, and
NMFS is proposing, to maintain the status quo surfclam quota of 3.4
million bu (181 million L) for 2011-2013. This quota represents the
maximum allowable quota under the FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
The proposed 2011-2013 quota for ocean quahogs also reflects the
status quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) in 2010. SAW 48,
released to the public in August 2009, found that the ocean quahog
stock is not overfished, nor is overfishing occurring. Estimated
fishable biomass in 2008 was above the management target, and estimated
fishing mortality was significantly below the target level. Fishing
mortality is not expected to reach the threshold if the proposed quota
is harvested each of the 3 years. Ocean quahog is an unproductive stock
that is being fished down from its pre-fishery level; however, after
several decades of relatively low fishing mortality, the stock is still
above the biomass target reference points. In fact, the stock biomass
is still at 81 percent of the pre-fishing level. Based on this
information, the Council recommended, and NMFS is proposing, to
maintain the status quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for
2011-2013. This quota level may be above current market demand, but
allows for market growth, should conditions change.
The proposed 2011-2013 quota for Maine ocean quahogs is the status
quo level of 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL). In 2008, the State of Maine
completed a stock assessment of the resource within the Maine Mahogany
Quahog Zone. This assessment was peer-reviewed as part of SAW 48. The
findings of the Maine quahog survey did not change the status of the
entire ocean quahog resource. The proposed quota represents the maximum
allowable quota under the FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), the NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the FMP,
other provisions of the MSA, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public comment. This action is authorized
by 50 CFR part 648 and has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) has been prepared, which describes the economic impacts
that this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A
summary of the IRFA is included in this section. The complete IRFA and
regulatory impact review is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
A description of the reasons why this action is being considered, as
well as the objectives of and legal basis for this proposed rule is
found in the preamble of this proposed rule. There are no Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
This action proposes fishing quotas for Atlantic surfclams and
ocean quahogs for 2011-2013. The Council analyzed four quota
alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam fishery, five alternatives for
the ocean quahog fishery, and four alternatives for the Maine ocean
quahog fishery. Each of the alternative sets included the proposed
alternative and a ``no action'' alternative. The three proposed quotas
for 2011-2013 are 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for the ocean quahog
fishery, 3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, and 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine ocean quahog
fishery.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small commercial
fishing entity as a firm with gross annual receipts not exceeding $4
million. In 2009, a total of 43 vessels reported harvesting surfclams
and/or ocean quahogs from Federal waters under the Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ) system. In addition, 19 vessels participated in the limited
access Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a total of 62 participants in
the 2009 fisheries. Average 2009 gross income from surfclam IFQ trips
was $833,333 per vessel, and from ocean quahog IFQ trips was $1,533,333
per vessel. The Maine ocean quahog fishery reported an average value of
$105,263 per vessel. Each vessel in this analysis is treated as a
single entity for purposes of size determination and impact assessment.
All 62 commercial fishing entities fall below the SBA size threshold
for small commercial fishing entities.
In addition to the active vessels that participate in the fishery
there are 45 ocean quahog quota IFQ allocation holders, 57 surfclam
allocation holders, and 40 Federal limited access Maine mahogany quahog
permit holders. An allocation holder may choose to fish or lease his or
her quota allocation.
Economic Impacts of This Proposed Action
The proposed quotas for 2011-2013 reflect the same quota levels set
for 2008-2010. Therefore, it is not expected that there will be any
different economic impacts beyond status quo resulting from the
proposed quota level. Leaving the ocean quahog quota at the harvest
level of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) is not expected to constrain
the fishery. In fact, actual ocean quahog landings for 2008 and 2009
were approximately 65 percent of the available quota. The total 2010
harvest is expected to be similar to recent years (as of September 30,
2010, only 47.6 percent of the quota had been harvested, a level
slightly less than on this date in 2009). The surfclam quota is
proposed to be set to the maximum allowed under the FMP.
In contrast to the ocean quahog harvest, the surfclam fishery has
harvested over 80 percent of the available quota each year since 2005,
except for 2009, where 69 percent of the quota was landed. As of
September 30, 2010, only 47.7 percent of the quota has been harvested
for FY 2010, a level slightly less than on this date in 2009.
The Maine ocean quahog quota is proposed to be set at the maximum
allowed under the FMP (100,000 Maine bu; 35,240 hL). It is anticipated
that by maintaining the status quo quota level for the next 3 years,
the fishing industry will benefit from the stability of product demand
from the seafood processors and being able to predict future fishery
performance based on past performance from the last 3 years.
Economic Impacts of Alternatives to the Proposed Action
The Council analyzed four alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, five alternatives for the ocean quahog fishery, and four
alternatives for the Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of the
alternative sets included the proposed alternative and a ``no action''
alternative. The selection of ``no action'' alternative would result in
no quotas being established, a closure of the fishery, and is contrary
to the FMP. Based on 2009 ex-vessel prices, the result of no Federal
surfclam or ocean quahog harvests in 2011 would be a loss of $30
million to the Federal surfclam fishery, $23 million to the ocean
quahog fishery, and $2 million to the Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a
total loss of $55 million. The viable alternatives to the proposed
quotas for ocean quahog
[[Page 65445]]
that are permissible under the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act include
a 20-percent decrease from the status quo, a 6.2-percent decrease from
the status quo, and a 20-percent increase from the status quo;
therefore, there are no significant alternatives that would reduce
economic impacts on the regulated entities.
The alternatives to the proposed surfclam quotas that are
permissible under the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act include a 45.6-
percent decrease from the status quo and a 4.4-percent decrease from
the status quo; therefore, there are no significant alternatives that
would reduce economic impacts on the regulated entities.
The alternatives to the proposed Maine ocean quahog quota that are
permissible under the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act include a 50-
percent decrease from the status quo and a 10-percent decrease from the
status quo; therefore, there are no significant alternatives that would
reduce economic impacts on the regulated entities.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
This proposed rule would not impose any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements. Therefore, the costs
of compliance would remain unchanged.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-26940 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P