Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace and Revocation of Class E Airspace; Easton, MD, 65250-65251 [2010-26684]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
65250
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
consequences of the Fitness for Duty
rule lies within the prescriptive
requirements for minimum days off
(MDO) that appear in 10 CFR
26.205(d)(3), (d)(4), (d)(5), and (d)(6).
The petitioner states that the current
requirements have created an undue
level of complexity and inflexibility in
managing worker fatigue, and requests
that the NRC replace its MDO
requirements at 10 CFR 26.205(d) with
a performance-based objective. The
petitioner proposes eliminating the
MDO requirements addressed in 10 CFR
26.205(d)(3) through (d)(6).
The petitioner also proposes
performing the actual hours worked
assessment required by 10 CFR
26.205(e) on a more frequent quarterly
basis as opposed to annually, and to
perform the averaging over the previous
quarter as opposed to over a shift cycle.
The petitioner proposes that 10 CFR
26.205(e)(1)(i) be amended to establish a
performance objective of an average of
54 hours per week (when not in a site
outage, security outage, or increased
threat condition), and any hours
exceeding this objective would continue
to be entered into a corrective action
program.
Other changes that the petitioner
proposes include:
• The elimination of the definitions
of shift cycle, and 8-, 10-, and 12-hour
shift schedules;
• The elimination of the outage
duration of 60 days;
• The elimination of the force-onforce tactical exercise exception at 10
CFR 26.207(b);
• The elimination of the word
‘‘unscheduled’’ in the discussion of
incidental duties at 10 CFR 26.205(b)(5);
• The addition of a new exception at
10 CFR 26.207(e) to address the
suspension of work hours due to acts of
nature or disasters that restrict access to
the site by relief personnel;
• The modification of the exception
for plant emergencies in 10 CFR
26.207(d) so that it applies as long as
emergency facilities are activated in
accordance with the licensee’s
emergency plan or implementing
procedures; and
• The proposed change to the
definition of ‘‘unit outage,’’ as submitted
by the Professional Reactor Operator
Society in a petition for rulemaking
dated October 16, 2009 (PRM–26–3) (74
FR 62257), and modified in a letter from
NEI dated February 9, 2010.
The petitioner believes that the
implementation of the Fitness for Duty
rule has resulted in a number of
unintended consequences (numerous
examples are cited in the petition) that
have diminished the safety benefits of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
the rule. The petitioner believes that the
petition addresses these consequences
by proposing amendments that will
make the requirements more
performance-based, resulting in
improved flexibility in work scheduling
while maintaining adequate provisions
to protect against worker fatigue.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day
of October 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–26715 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0936; Airspace
Docket No. 10–AEA–23]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace and Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Easton, MD
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify Class E surface airspace and
airspace 700 feet above the surface, and
remove Class E airspace designated as
an extension to Class D airspace at
Easton, MD. The Easton Non-Directional
Beacon (NDB) has been
decommissioned and new Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) have been developed for Easton
Airport/Newnam Field. This action
would enhance the safety and airspace
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U. S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC
20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–647–
5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must
identify the Docket Number FAA–2010–
0936; Airspace Docket No. 10–AEA–23,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Giddens, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;
telephone (404) 305–5610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments,
as they may desire. Comments that
provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are
particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the
proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2010–0936; Airspace Docket No. 10–
AEA–23) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management System (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2010–0936; Airspace
Docket No. 10–AEA–23.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can
also be accessed through the FAA’s Web
page at https://www.faa.gov/
airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/
publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
65251
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Administration, Room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an
amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify
Class E surface airspace and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface to accommodate
new SIAPs developed for Easton
Airport/Newnam Field, Easton, MD, as
the Easton NDB has been
decommissioned. This eliminates the
need for Class E airspace designated as
an extension to Class D surface area,
and, therefore, would be removed for
the continued safety and management of
IFR operations
Class E airspace designated as surface
areas, Class E airspace designated as
extensions to Class D airspace, and
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface are published
in Paragraph 6002, 6004, and 6005
respectively of FAA order 7400.9U,
dated August 18, 2010, and effective
September 15, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This proposed
rulemaking is promulgated under the
authority described in Subtitle VII, Part,
A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority as it
would amend the Class E airspace area
at Easton Airport/Newnam Field,
Easton, MD.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE
AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE
ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for Part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
[Amended]
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated
as surface areas.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace areas
designated as an extension to a class D
surface area.
*
*
*
AEA MD E4
*
PO 00000
*
*
*
Easton, MD [REMOVED]
*
Frm 00003
*
Fmt 4702
*
*
*
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October
12, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010–26684 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1010 Airspace
Docket No. 10–AEA–24]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Charleston, WV
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify Class E Airspace at Charleston,
WV, to accommodate the additional
airspace needed for the holding pattern
associated with the new Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) developed at Yeager Airport.
This action would enhance the safety
and airspace management of Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
airport.
*
Sfmt 4702
Comments must be received on
or before December 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–
647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You
must identify the Docket Number FAA–
2010–1010; Airspace Docket No. 10–
AEA–24, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the
Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Giddens, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
DATES:
AEA MD E2 Easton, MD [AMENDED]
Easton Airport/Newnam Field, MD
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 2,600 feet MSL
within a 4.0-mile radius of the Easton
Airport/Newnam Field. This Class E airspace
area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously purblished in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
*
*
AEA MD E5 Easton, MD [AMENDED]
Easton Airport/Newnam Field, MD
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface of the Earth within a
6.5-mile radius of the Easton Airport/
Newnam Field.
SUMMARY:
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9U,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective
September 15, 2010, is amended as
follows:
*
*
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The Proposed Amendment
§ 71.1
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65250-65251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26684]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0936; Airspace Docket No. 10-AEA-23]
Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace and Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Easton, MD
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E surface airspace and
airspace 700 feet above the surface, and remove Class E airspace
designated as an extension to Class D airspace at Easton, MD. The
Easton Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) has been decommissioned and new
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) have been developed for
Easton Airport/Newnam Field. This action would enhance the safety and
airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U. S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001; Telephone: 1-
800-647-5527; Fax: 202-493-2251. You must identify the Docket Number
FAA-2010-0936; Airspace Docket No. 10-AEA-23, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and review received comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2010-0936; Airspace Docket No. 10-AEA-23) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2010-0936; Airspace Docket No. 10-AEA-23.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at https://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
[[Page 65251]]
Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-9677, to
request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify Class E surface airspace and
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface to
accommodate new SIAPs developed for Easton Airport/Newnam Field,
Easton, MD, as the Easton NDB has been decommissioned. This eliminates
the need for Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D
surface area, and, therefore, would be removed for the continued safety
and management of IFR operations
Class E airspace designated as surface areas, Class E airspace
designated as extensions to Class D airspace, and Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface are published in
Paragraph 6002, 6004, and 6005 respectively of FAA order 7400.9U, dated
August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign
the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would amend the Class E airspace area at Easton
Airport/Newnam Field, Easton, MD.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE
AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010,
is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas.
* * * * *
AEA MD E2 Easton, MD [AMENDED]
Easton Airport/Newnam Field, MD
(Lat. 38[deg]48'15'' N., long. 76[deg]04'08'' W.)
That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,600 feet MSL within a 4.0-mile radius of the Easton Airport/Newnam
Field. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously purblished
in the Airport/Facility Directory.
* * * * *
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace areas designated as an extension to
a class D surface area.
* * * * *
AEA MD E4 Easton, MD [REMOVED]
* * * * *
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
AEA MD E5 Easton, MD [AMENDED]
Easton Airport/Newnam Field, MD
(Lat. 38[deg]48'15'' N., long. 76[deg]04'08'' W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
of the Earth within a 6.5-mile radius of the Easton Airport/Newnam
Field.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 12, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-26684 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P