Security Zones; Sabine Bank Channel, Sabine Pass Channel and Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX, 65232-65236 [2010-26670]
Download as PDF
65232
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph 32(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise paragraph (a) of § 117.123 to
read as follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0954]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Illinois River, Pekin, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
■
§ 117.123
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Arkansas Waterway.
(a) Across the Arkansas Waterway, the
draw of the Rob Roy Drawbridge, mile
67.4, at Pine Bluff, Arkansas is
maintained in the closed to navigation
position and is remotely operated. Any
vessel which requires an opening of the
draw of this bridge shall establish
contact by radiotelephone with the
remote drawbridge operator on VHF–
FM Channel 12 in Omaha, Nebraska. To
establish contact, the vessel shall key
the VHF–FM radio microphone four
times in five seconds and listen for an
acknowledgement tone. The remote
drawbridge operator will then establish
normal verbal radio communication on
VHF–FM Channel 12 and advise the
vessel whether the requested span can
be immediately opened and will
maintain constant radio contact with the
vessel until the requested span has
opened and vessel passage has been
completed. The bridge is equipped with
a Photoelectric Boat Detection System to
prevent the span from lowering if there
is an obstruction under the span. If the
drawbridge cannot be opened
immediately, the remote drawbridge
operator will notify the calling vessel
and provide an estimated time for a
drawspan opening.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Mary E. Landry,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–26672 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
ACTION:
The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Pekin
Railroad Drawbridge across the Illinois
Waterway, mile 151.2, Pekin, Illinois.
The deviation is necessary to allow the
replacement of lift cables and associated
mechanisms on the lift span and allows
the bridge to be maintained in the
closed-to-navigation position during the
deviation period.
DATES: This deviation is effective for
five days starting at 6 a.m. on November
9, 2010 and ending at 11:59 p.m. on
November 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0954 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0954 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box
and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Eric A. Washburn, Bridge
Administrator, Coast Guard; telephone
314–269–2378, e-mail
Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Union
Pacific Railroad requested a temporary
deviation for the Pekin Railroad
Drawbridge, across the Illinois
Waterway, mile 151.2, at Pekin, Illinois
to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position for a five day period while lift
cables and associated mechanisms are
replaced on the lift span. The Pekin
Railroad Drawbridge currently operates
in accordance with 33 CFR 117.5, which
states the general requirement that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
drawbridges shall open promptly and
fully for the passage of vessels when a
request to open is given in accordance
with the subpart.
There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the
Illinois Waterway.
The Pekin Railroad Drawbridge, in the
closed-to-navigation position, provides
a vertical clearance of 34.3 feet above
normal pool. Navigation on the
waterway consists primarily of
commercial tows and recreational
watercraft. This temporary deviation has
been coordinated with waterway users.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Eric A. Washburn,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–26674 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0316]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Sabine Bank Channel,
Sabine Pass Channel and SabineNeches Waterway, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Interim rule with request
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is issuing an
interim rule based on comments
received from the subject Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking published in the
Federal Register on May 27, 2010. This
interim rule establishes moving security
zones for certain vessels for which the
Captain of the Port, Port Arthur deems
enhanced security measures necessary.
In addition, it establishes security zones
encompassing the mooring basins of
LNG carriers while they are moored at
the Golden Pass LNG facility in Sabine,
TX and/or the Sabine Pass LNG facility
located in Cameron Parish, LA.
DATES: This interim rule is effective in
the CFR on October 22, 2010. This rule
is effective with actual notice for the
purposes of enforcement on August 23,
2010. Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 22, 2010. Requests
for public meetings must be received by
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the Coast Guard on or before November
1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0316 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this interim rule,
call or e-mail Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine
Safety Unit Port Arthur, TX; telephone
409–719–5086, e-mail
scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0316),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. Insert
‘‘USCG–2009–0316’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then in the interim
rule row click on the balloon shape in
the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the
Facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may change this rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2009–
0316’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65233
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Information
On May 27, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Security Zones; Sabine Bank
Channel, Sabine Pass Channel and
Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX’’ in the
Federal Register (75 FR 29695). We
received one comment on the proposed
rule. No meetings were requested and
none were held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. This finding is based on the
fact that the Coast Guard received only
one comment concerning the published
NPRM and that the changes
incorporated are not substantive. That
is, the changes will not result in any
interference to normal vessel traffic in
the area. By making the interim rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication the necessary security zones
can be implemented without further
delay. And, additional comments and
the security zones established by this
interim rule will be evaluated
throughout the interim rule comment
period.
Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing
moving security zones for certain
vessels, for which the Captain of the
Port deems enhanced security measures
are necessary. Mariners will be notified
of the activation of a moving security
zone by Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Active moving security zones may also
be identified by the presence of escort
vessels displaying flashing blue law
enforcement lights.
The moving security zones would be
activated for certain vessels within the
U.S. territorial waters through Sabine
Bank Channel, Sabine Pass Channel and
the Sabine-Neches Waterway, extending
from the surface to the bottom. These
moving security zones would extend
channel edge to channel edge on the
Sabine Bank and Sabine Pass Channel
and shoreline to shoreline on the
Sabine-Neches Waterway, 2 miles ahead
and 1 mile astern of the designated
vessels while in transit. Meeting,
crossing or overtaking situations are not
permitted within the security zone
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port.
In addition, the Coast Guard is
establishing security zones for the
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
65234
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mooring basins at the Golden Pass LNG
facility in Sabine, TX and the Sabine
Pass LNG facility located in Cameron
Parish, LA while LNG carriers are
moored at these facilities.
These proposed security zones would
be part of a comprehensive port security
regime designed to safeguard human
life, vessels, and waterfront facilities
against sabotage or terrorist attacks.
All vessels not exempted under
paragraph (b) of § 165.819 would be
prohibited from entering or remaining
in these security zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Port Arthur or his designated
representative. For authorization to
enter the proposed security zones,
vessels can contact the Captain of the
Port’s on-scene representative or Vessel
Traffic Service Port Arthur on VHF
Channel 01A or 65A, by telephone at
(409) 719–5070, or by facsimile at (409)
719–5090.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received one
comment requesting that the
establishment of a security zone
extending 100-feet around LNG carriers
while moored at Sabine Pass LNG and
Golden Pass LNG facilities be extended
to include the entire mooring basin. The
Coast Guard concurs with this
recommendation and modified the
regulatory language in § 165.819 (a)(1)
accordingly. Additionally, the
commenter noted that the location of
the Sabine Pass facility should be
changed from Cheniere, LA to Cameron
Parish, LA. This change was also
incorporated into the final regulatory
language.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this interim rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. The basis of this finding is
that the proposed fixed security zones
around moored LNG carriers would be
of limited size and duration and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
affected area would not hinder or delay
regular vessel traffic. The moving
security zone wound be limited and
would not create undue delay to vessel
traffic because vessel traffic may request
permission to enter the zone from the
Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
fixed or moving security zones. The
fixed security zones are of limited size
and duration and the affected area will
not hinder or delay regular vessel traffic.
The moving security zone rule will not
create undue delay to vessel traffic
because vessel traffic may request
permission to enter the zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
addresses regulations establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated
Navigation Areas and security or safety
zones. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
65235
section is prohibited for all vessels
except:
(i) Commercial vessels operating at
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
waterfront facilities within these zones;
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(ii) Commercial vessels transiting
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
directly to or from waterfront facilities
requirements, Security measures,
within these zones;
(iii) Vessels providing direct
Waterways.
operational or logistical support to
■ For the reasons discussed in the
commercial vessels within these zones;
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
(iv) Vessels operated by the
CFR part 165 as follows:
appropriate port authority or by
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION facilities located within these zones;
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS and
(v) Vessels operated by Federal, State,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
county, or municipal law enforcement
continues to read as follows:
agencies.
(2) Entry into or remaining in a
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
moving security zone described in
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. paragraph (a)(2) of this section is
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
prohibited for all vessels except:
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
(i) Moored vessels or vessels anchored
in a designated anchorage area. A
■ 2. Add new § 165.819 to read as
moored or an anchored vessel in a
follows:
security zone described in paragraph
§ 165.819 Security Zone; Sabine Bank
(a)(2) of this section must remain
Channel, Sabine Pass Channel and Sabinemoored or anchored unless it obtains
Neches Waterway, TX.
permission from the Captain of the Port
(a) Location. (1) The following LNG
to do otherwise;
facility mooring basins are designated as
(ii) Commercial vessels operating at
fixed security zones whenever LNG
waterfront facilities located within the
carriers are moored within them:
zone;
(i) Golden Pass LNG, Sabine TX: All
(iii) Vessels providing direct
waters south of a line connecting the
operational support to commercial
following points—beginning at
vessels within a moving security zone;
29°45′58″ N, 093°55′40″ W; then east to
(iv) Vessels operated by Federal,
a point at 29°45′52.8″ N, 093°55′20.8″
State, county, or municipal law
W; then bearing 120° T to the shoreline
enforcement agencies.
at 29°45′50″ N, 093°55′17″ W.
(3) Meeting, crossing or overtaking
(ii) Sabine Pass LNG, Cameron Parish, situations are not permitted within the
LA: All waters north of a line connecting security zone described in paragraph
the following points—beginning at the
(a)(2) of this section unless specifically
shoreline in position 29°44′34.7″ N,
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
093°52′29″ W; then southeast to a point
(4) Other persons or vessels requiring
at 29°44′31.4″ N, 093°52′26.4″ W; then
entry into security zones described in
bearing 121° T to a point at 29°44′25.2″
this section must request permission
N, 093°52′14.6″ W; then bearing 116° T
from the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur
to the shoreline at 29°44′23.75 N,
or designated representative.
(5) To request permission to enter a
093°52′00″ W.
(2) The following areas are designated security zone described in this section,
as moving security zones: All waters of
contact Vessel Traffic Service Port
the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur
Arthur on VHF Channel 01A or 65A; by
Zone commencing at U.S. territorial
telephone at (409) 719–5070; by fax at
waters and extending from the surface
(409) 719–5090; or contact the Captain
to the bottom, channel edge to channel
of the Port’s designated on-scene patrol
edge on the Sabine Bank and Sabine
vessel on VHF channel 13 or 16.
(6) All persons and vessels within a
Pass Channels and shoreline to
security zone described in this section
shoreline on the Sabine-Neches
must comply with the instructions of
Waterway, 2 miles ahead and 1 mile
the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur,
astern of certain designated vessels
while in transit within in the Captain of designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard
patrol personnel or other designated
the Port, Port Arthur zone. Mariners
representatives. Designated on-scene
would be notified of designated vessels
by Broadcast Notice to Mariners and the U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel
include commissioned, warrant, and
presence of escort vessels displaying
petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
flashing blue law enforcement lights.
Designated representatives include
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or
Federal, State, local and municipal law
remaining in a fixed security zone
enforcement agencies.
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
65236
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 23, 2010.
J.J. Plunkett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander (LCDR) Eva VanCamp,
Sector New Orleans, Coast Guard;
telephone 504–365–2392, e-mail
Eva.VanCamp@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coast Guard
Regulatory Information
[FR Doc. 2010–26670 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0846]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone, in the Vicinity of the
Michoud Slip Position 30≥0′34.2″ N,
89≥55′40.7″ W to Position 30≥0′29.5″ N,
89≥55′52.6″ W
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Captain of the Port of
New Orleans, under the authority of the
Magnuson Act, 33 CFR 165.30 and
165.33, has established a security zone
in the vicinity of the Michoud Slip
encompassing the entire slip from
position 30°0′34.2″ N, 89°55′40.7″ W to
position 30°0′29.5″ N, 89°55′52.6″ W
across the mouth of the slip. Vessels
will not be allowed to enter this security
zone without the permission of the
Captain of the Port, New Orleans. This
security zone is necessary to protect the
Deepwater Horizon blowout preventer
and adjacent piers and infrastructure
from destruction, loss or injury from
sabotage or other subversive acts,
accidents or other causes of a similar
nature.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
from October 22, 2010 through
December, 31, 2010. This rule is
effective with actual notice for purposes
of enforcement from September 11,
2010, at 12 noon, through December 31,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0846 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0846 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest to delay the rule.
Immediate action is necessary to protect
the Deepwater Horizon blowout
preventer and adjacent piers and
infrastructure from destruction, loss or
injury from sabotage or other subversive
acts, accidents or other causes of a
similar nature.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. This security zone is needed to
protect the Deepwater Horizon blowout
preventer and adjacent piers and
infrastructure from destruction, loss or
injury from sabotage or other subversive
acts, accidents or other causes of a
similar nature. Additional notice is
impracticable and contrary to public
interest.
Basis and Purpose
An investigation associated with the
Deepwater Horizon incident is currently
taking place in the vicinity of Michoud
Slip. A security zone has been
established encompassing the entire slip
from position 30°0′34.2″ N, 89°55′40.7″
W to position 30°0′29.5″ N, 89°55′52.6″
W across the mouth of the slip. Vessels
will not be allowed to enter this security
zone without the permission of the
Captain of the Port, New Orleans. This
security zone is necessary to protect the
Deepwater Horizon blowout preventer
and adjacent piers and infrastructure
from destruction, loss or injury from
sabotage or other subversive acts,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accidents or other causes of a similar
nature.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard has established
several safety and security zones in
South Louisiana to protect vessels and
facilities engaged in operations
associated with the Deepwater Horizon
incident. This security zone is in
addition to those safety and security
zones and adds additional requirements
which are needed to ensure the safety of
evidence needed for the investigation of
the incident. This security zone is
necessary to protect the Deepwater
Horizon blowout preventer and adjacent
piers and infrastructure from
destruction, loss or injury from sabotage
or other subversive acts, accidents or
other causes of a similar nature.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). Due to its location the impacts
on routine navigation are expected to be
minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under
5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels, intending to transit in the
vicinity of Michoud Slip, encompassing
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65232-65236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26670]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0316]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zones; Sabine Bank Channel, Sabine Pass Channel and
Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Interim rule with request comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is issuing an interim rule based on comments
received from the subject Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in
the Federal Register on May 27, 2010. This interim rule establishes
moving security zones for certain vessels for which the Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur deems enhanced security measures necessary. In
addition, it establishes security zones encompassing the mooring basins
of LNG carriers while they are moored at the Golden Pass LNG facility
in Sabine, TX and/or the Sabine Pass LNG facility located in Cameron
Parish, LA.
DATES: This interim rule is effective in the CFR on October 22, 2010.
This rule is effective with actual notice for the purposes of
enforcement on August 23, 2010. Comments and related material must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before November 22, 2010. Requests
for public meetings must be received by
[[Page 65233]]
the Coast Guard on or before November 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0316 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this interim
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur,
TX; telephone 409-719-5086, e-mail scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0316), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. Insert ``USCG-2009-0316'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then in the interim rule row click on the balloon
shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change this rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-0316'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Regulatory Information
On May 27, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Security Zones; Sabine Bank Channel, Sabine Pass
Channel and Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX'' in the Federal Register (75 FR
29695). We received one comment on the proposed rule. No meetings were
requested and none were held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. This finding is based on the fact
that the Coast Guard received only one comment concerning the published
NPRM and that the changes incorporated are not substantive. That is,
the changes will not result in any interference to normal vessel
traffic in the area. By making the interim rule effective less than 30
days after publication the necessary security zones can be implemented
without further delay. And, additional comments and the security zones
established by this interim rule will be evaluated throughout the
interim rule comment period.
Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing moving security zones for certain
vessels, for which the Captain of the Port deems enhanced security
measures are necessary. Mariners will be notified of the activation of
a moving security zone by Broadcast Notice to Mariners. Active moving
security zones may also be identified by the presence of escort vessels
displaying flashing blue law enforcement lights.
The moving security zones would be activated for certain vessels
within the U.S. territorial waters through Sabine Bank Channel, Sabine
Pass Channel and the Sabine-Neches Waterway, extending from the surface
to the bottom. These moving security zones would extend channel edge to
channel edge on the Sabine Bank and Sabine Pass Channel and shoreline
to shoreline on the Sabine-Neches Waterway, 2 miles ahead and 1 mile
astern of the designated vessels while in transit. Meeting, crossing or
overtaking situations are not permitted within the security zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port.
In addition, the Coast Guard is establishing security zones for the
[[Page 65234]]
mooring basins at the Golden Pass LNG facility in Sabine, TX and the
Sabine Pass LNG facility located in Cameron Parish, LA while LNG
carriers are moored at these facilities.
These proposed security zones would be part of a comprehensive port
security regime designed to safeguard human life, vessels, and
waterfront facilities against sabotage or terrorist attacks.
All vessels not exempted under paragraph (b) of Sec. 165.819 would
be prohibited from entering or remaining in these security zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur or his designated
representative. For authorization to enter the proposed security zones,
vessels can contact the Captain of the Port's on-scene representative
or Vessel Traffic Service Port Arthur on VHF Channel 01A or 65A, by
telephone at (409) 719-5070, or by facsimile at (409) 719-5090.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received one comment requesting that the
establishment of a security zone extending 100-feet around LNG carriers
while moored at Sabine Pass LNG and Golden Pass LNG facilities be
extended to include the entire mooring basin. The Coast Guard concurs
with this recommendation and modified the regulatory language in Sec.
165.819 (a)(1) accordingly. Additionally, the commenter noted that the
location of the Sabine Pass facility should be changed from Cheniere,
LA to Cameron Parish, LA. This change was also incorporated into the
final regulatory language.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this interim rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. The basis of
this finding is that the proposed fixed security zones around moored
LNG carriers would be of limited size and duration and the affected
area would not hinder or delay regular vessel traffic. The moving
security zone wound be limited and would not create undue delay to
vessel traffic because vessel traffic may request permission to enter
the zone from the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit through the fixed or moving security zones. The fixed security
zones are of limited size and duration and the affected area will not
hinder or delay regular vessel traffic. The moving security zone rule
will not create undue delay to vessel traffic because vessel traffic
may request permission to enter the zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 65235]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule addresses regulations establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add new Sec. 165.819 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.819 Security Zone; Sabine Bank Channel, Sabine Pass Channel
and Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX.
(a) Location. (1) The following LNG facility mooring basins are
designated as fixed security zones whenever LNG carriers are moored
within them:
(i) Golden Pass LNG, Sabine TX: All waters south of a line
connecting the following points--beginning at 29[deg]45'58'' N,
093[deg]55'40'' W; then east to a point at 29[deg]45'52.8'' N,
093[deg]55'20.8'' W; then bearing 120[deg] T to the shoreline at
29[deg]45'50'' N, 093[deg]55'17'' W.
(ii) Sabine Pass LNG, Cameron Parish, LA: All waters north of a
line connecting the following points--beginning at the shoreline in
position 29[deg]44'34.7'' N, 093[deg]52'29'' W; then southeast to a
point at 29[deg]44'31.4'' N, 093[deg]52'26.4'' W; then bearing 121[deg]
T to a point at 29[deg]44'25.2'' N, 093[deg]52'14.6'' W; then bearing
116[deg] T to the shoreline at 29[deg]44'23.75 N, 093[deg]52'00'' W.
(2) The following areas are designated as moving security zones:
All waters of the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur Zone commencing at
U.S. territorial waters and extending from the surface to the bottom,
channel edge to channel edge on the Sabine Bank and Sabine Pass
Channels and shoreline to shoreline on the Sabine-Neches Waterway, 2
miles ahead and 1 mile astern of certain designated vessels while in
transit within in the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur zone. Mariners
would be notified of designated vessels by Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and the presence of escort vessels displaying flashing blue law
enforcement lights.
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or remaining in a fixed security
zone described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is prohibited for
all vessels except:
(i) Commercial vessels operating at waterfront facilities within
these zones;
(ii) Commercial vessels transiting directly to or from waterfront
facilities within these zones;
(iii) Vessels providing direct operational or logistical support to
commercial vessels within these zones;
(iv) Vessels operated by the appropriate port authority or by
facilities located within these zones; and
(v) Vessels operated by Federal, State, county, or municipal law
enforcement agencies.
(2) Entry into or remaining in a moving security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section is prohibited for all vessels except:
(i) Moored vessels or vessels anchored in a designated anchorage
area. A moored or an anchored vessel in a security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section must remain moored or anchored unless
it obtains permission from the Captain of the Port to do otherwise;
(ii) Commercial vessels operating at waterfront facilities located
within the zone;
(iii) Vessels providing direct operational support to commercial
vessels within a moving security zone;
(iv) Vessels operated by Federal, State, county, or municipal law
enforcement agencies.
(3) Meeting, crossing or overtaking situations are not permitted
within the security zone described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port.
(4) Other persons or vessels requiring entry into security zones
described in this section must request permission from the Captain of
the Port, Port Arthur or designated representative.
(5) To request permission to enter a security zone described in
this section, contact Vessel Traffic Service Port Arthur on VHF Channel
01A or 65A; by telephone at (409) 719-5070; by fax at (409) 719-5090;
or contact the Captain of the Port's designated on-scene patrol vessel
on VHF channel 13 or 16.
(6) All persons and vessels within a security zone described in
this section must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur, designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel or other designated representatives. Designated on-scene U.S.
Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Designated representatives include
Federal, State, local and municipal law enforcement agencies.
[[Page 65236]]
Dated: August 23, 2010.
J.J. Plunkett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2010-26670 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P