Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities; Hospice Services, 65282-65291 [2010-26395]
Download as PDF
65282
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
remote access capabilities where
interested parties may listen in and
review the presentations over the
internet simultaneously. Parties
remotely accessing the meeting will
have the opportunity to ask questions
during the open comment period. To
register to use this capability, please
contact the NPPTL, Policy and
Standards Development Branch, P.O.
Box 18070, 626 Cochrans Mill Road,
Pittsburgh, PA 15236, telephone 412–
386–5200, fax 412–386–4089. This
option will be available to participants
on a first come, first served basis and is
limited to the first 50 participants.
Background: NIOSH, National
Personal Protective Technology
Laboratory (NPPTL), will present
information to attendees concerning the
development of the concepts being
considered for performance criteria of
various classes of respirators.
Participants will be given an
opportunity to ask questions and to
present individual comments that they
may wish to have considered.
Reference: Information regarding
documents that will be discussed at the
meeting may be obtained from the
NIOSH Web site using this link:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/
public/ using the docket numbers listed
in this notice.
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 651–675, 677; 30
U.S.C. 3, 5, 7, 811, 842(h), 844.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Tanja Popovic,
Deputy Associate Director for Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–26129 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 483
[CMS–3140–P]
RIN 0938–AP32
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Requirements for Long Term Care
Facilities; Hospice Services
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
revise the requirements that an
institution would have to meet in order
to qualify to participate as a skilled
nursing facility (SNF) in the Medicare
program, or as a nursing facility (NF) in
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
the Medicaid program. We are
proposing these requirements to ensure
that long-term care (LTC) facilities (that
is, SNFs and NFs) that chose to arrange
for the provision of hospice care
through an agreement with one or more
Medicare-certified hospice providers
would have in place a written
agreement with the hospice that
specified the roles and responsibilities
of each entity.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on December 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–3140–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ and enter the file code to
find the document accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–3140–
P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD 21244–
8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–3140–
P, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by following
the instructions at the end of the
‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements’’ section in this document.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trish Brooks, (410) 786–4561. Marcia
Newton, (410) 786–5265. Jeannie Miller,
(410) 786–3164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
According to CMS data, at any point
in time, approximately 1.4 million
elderly and disabled nursing home
residents are receiving care in nearly
16,000 Medicare- and Medicaidcertified Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
in the United States. More than 20
percent of older Americans die in
nursing homes. (Johnson, Sandra H.,
Hastings Center Report, Making Room
for Dying: End of Life Care in Nursing
Homes; November/December 2005,
Special Report 35 (6), S37–S41.)
Therefore, providing care at the end of
life, particularly palliative care, is an
important part of nursing home care.
Palliative care means patient and
family-centered care that optimizes
quality of life by anticipating,
preventing, and treating suffering.
Palliative care in an LTC facility
involves addressing physical,
intellectual, emotional, social, and
spiritual needs, as well as facilitating
resident autonomy, access to
information, and choice throughout the
continuum of illness. Palliative care
independent of the hospice benefit may
also be provided by LTC facilities,
which may eliminate the need for
hospice services for their residents.
Hospice care is provided for
terminally ill individuals with a
prognosis of 6 months or less if their
terminal illness runs its normal course.
These patients have elected to forgo
curative care and wish to remain in
their place of residence. A Medicarecertified hospice provides services in
family homes, LTC facilities, and any
other dwelling that individuals call
‘‘home.’’ Hospice care may also be
provided while individuals are
hospitalized. According to a March 2000
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation’s (ASPE)
study, entitled ‘‘Use of Medicare’s
Hospice Benefit by Nursing Facility
Residents,’’ nursing facilities served
approximately 35 percent of all hospice
beneficiaries in some markets. The
study concluded, ‘‘hospice in nursing
homes is a very prevalent
phenomenon,’’ but added that
‘‘Guidelines are * * * needed to clarify
the need for nursing facilities to provide
palliative care and the roles and
responsibilities of hospices and nursing
facilities when treating a hospice
patient. Minimal contract provisions
affecting the two types of providers
when treating residents enrolled in
hospice are needed as well.’’ (https://
aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2000/
samhbes.htm.)
Under current regulations, an LTC
facility may choose to have a written
agreement with one or more hospice
providers to provide hospice care to a
Medicare eligible resident who wishes
to elect the hospice benefit. However, if
the facility chooses not to contract with
a Medicare-certified hospice to provide
hospice services for the resident who
wishes to elect the benefit, the LTC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
facility is responsible for assisting the
resident in transferring to a facility that
will arrange for the provision of such
services, as requested by the resident.
(See 42 CFR 483.12(a)(2)(i), Transfer and
discharge requirements.)
Hospice care for residents who choose
to live in various types of facilities has
come under scrutiny as a result of a
variety of findings, including Operation
Restore Trust (ORT) activities, Office of
Inspector General (OIG) reports from
1997, (U.S. D.H.H.S. OIG, ‘‘Hospice and
Nursing Home Contractual
Relationships,’’ Nov. 1997, OEI–05–95–
00251, https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/
oei-05-95-00251.pdf) and 1998 (OIG
Special Fraud Alert, ‘‘Fraud and Abuse,
Nursing Home Arrangements with
Hospices,’’ Mar. 1998 https://oig.hhs.gov/
fraud/docs/alertsandbulletins/
hospice.pdf ), and a 2000 report from
the Department’s Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) Office
of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care
Policy and the Urban Institute;
‘‘Synthesis and Analysis of Medicare
Hospice Benefit Executive Summary
and Recommendations.’’ (Harvell, J.;
Jackson, B.; Gage, B.; Miller, S.; and
Mor, V., Mar. 2000, https://aspe.hhs.gov/
daltcp/reports/2000/samhbes.htm). In
addition, based on feedback to CMS
from state surveyors, there is a lack of
coordination between LTC facilities and
Medicare-certified hospice providers.
We believe there is a lack of clear
regulatory direction regarding the
responsibilities of providers in caring
for LTC facility residents who receive
hospice care from a Medicare-certified
hospice provider, which could result in
duplicative or missing services. We
believe this problem would be remedied
by a regulatory requirement for a written
agreement between the two types of
entities when they are both involved in
the care of a Medicare beneficiary. A
written agreement would help ensure
that required services are provided to
beneficiaries and protect beneficiary
health and safety, which could be
endangered by a lack of coordination
between hospice and LTC providers.
Such an agreement ensures that care is
coordinated by specifying what services
each provider will provide. For
instance, an LTC facility is considered
a resident’s home. An agreement
between the providers would specify
that the LTC facility must furnish room
and board and meet personal care and
nursing needs, while the hospice must
provide services that are necessary for
the care of the resident’s terminal
illness, such as counseling and
palliation of pain.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65283
A. Statutory Authority
1. Overview
Sections 1819(b)(4)(A)(i) and
1919(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Social Security
Act (the Act) state that, to the extent
needed to fulfill all plans of care
described in sections 1819(b)(2) and
1919(b)(2) of the Act, a skilled nursing
facility or nursing facility must provide
(or arrange for the provision of) nursing
and related services and specialized
rehabilitative services to attain or
maintain the highest practicable
physical, mental, and psychosocial
well-being of each resident. The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
(OBRA) of 1986 permitted States to add
a hospice benefit to their State Medicaid
plans. The original legislation (OBRA
’86), adding the optional hospice
benefit, specified, ‘‘hospice care may be
provided to an individual while such
individual is a resident of a skilled
nursing facility or intermediate care
facility’’ (Pub. L. 99–272, Sec.
9505(a)(2)).
This proposed rule would set forth
requirements consistent with
requirements in the June 5, 2008 final
rule (73 FR 32088) entitled ‘‘Medicare
and Medicaid Program: Hospice
Conditions of Participation.’’ The
hospice care final rule set forth new
requirements that a Medicare-certified
hospice provider must meet when it
provides services, including the
provision of hospice care to residents of
an LTC facility who elect the hospice
benefit. Section 418.112(e) specifies
what must be included in a written
agreement between a Medicare-certified
hospice provider and an LTC facility.
We propose making the requirements
for LTC facilities consistent with the
June 2008 final rule. To this end, the
language in this proposed rule was
crafted to mirror the hospice final rule
as much as possible to ensure that both
entities are held equally responsible for
the written agreement.
This proposed rule would also
support current LTC requirements that
protect a resident’s right to a dignified
existence, self-determination, and
communication with, and access to,
persons and services inside and outside
the facility.
2. Rationale for New Requirements
A 2002 Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services’ (DHHS)
Advisory Committee Report and a 2003
Hastings Center Report have identified a
lack of coordination between LTC
facilities and Medicare-certified hospice
providers. In 2002, the Secretary of
DHHS’ Advisory Committee on
Regulatory Reform developed
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
65284
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
recommendations to address key
regulatory issues. One of the
recommendations of the DHHS
Secretary’s Advisory Committee report
was to clarify the relationship between
nursing facilities and hospice providers.
The DHHS Secretary’s Advisory
Committee report stated that there was
a need to ‘‘reconcile conflicts in
regulations and/or guidance that
prevent clear delineation as to which
entity (LTC facility or the hospice) is
required to have the lead in providing
required end-of-life care to SNF
residents once they elect their hospice
benefit.’’ The report recommended
revising guidance and procedures to
recognize hospice care in the context of
the SNF survey protocol. The report
further recommended that, if necessary,
CMS revise the CoPs for Medicarecertified hospices, SNFs, and NFs to
ensure beneficiaries’ access to the full
range of benefits to which they are
statutorily entitled, and to ensure the
appropriate entity is accountable for
care that should be provided, which is
based on a resident’s unique needs
(https://regreform.hhs.gov/
finalreport.htm).
An article in the March/April 2003
Hastings Center Report, ‘‘Is
discontinuity in palliative care a
culpable act of omission?’’ stated,
‘‘Hospice patients sign up to obtain
palliative care, regardless of the care
setting in which they reside. Part of
honoring this obligation requires a
hospice to attend to the needs of
continuity when the site of care does
change.’’ The article further stated that,
while most non-hospice healthcare
providers do not follow their terminally
ill patients to other care sites, hospice
staff are required by the Medicare CoPs
at § 418.56, as well as by industry and
accreditation standards, to both provide
and oversee palliative care as the patient
moves across care sites with which the
hospice has a contractual relationship.
The article concludes that continuity of
care is optimized by care management
across care sites. (True Ryndes, Linda
Emanuel, The Hastings Center Report,
Hastings-on-Hudson: March/April 2003,
page S45). (https://findarticles.com/p/
articles/mi_go2103/is_2_33/
ai_n7517557/?tag=content;col1)
This proposed rule, therefore, seeks to
clarify the role of the LTC facility and
the Medicare-certified hospice by
requiring clear delineation of each
provider’s responsibility for maintaining
continuity of care.
The problems LTC facilities and
hospices have with the coordination of
care, as identified in both the Hastings
Center Report and the HHS Secretary’s
Advisory Committee report, is a direct
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
result of the lack of Medicare
requirements specifically related to the
provision of contracted hospice care in
the current regulatory requirements for
LTC facilities. The overall intent of this
proposed rule is to promote consistency
and continuity of care by requiring that
a written agreement between the LTC
facility and the Medicare-certified
hospice provider clearly identify the
responsibilities of each entity when
arranging for the provision of hospice
services to an LTC resident who elects
the hospice benefit. This agreement
would be required even if the Medicarecertified hospice and the LTC facility
were under common control and/or
ownership.
Therefore, in light of the HHS
Secretary’s Advisory Committee report
and Hastings Center Report, and to
ensure quality hospice care is provided
in a coordinated manner to LTC facility
residents who have elected to receive
hospice services, we are proposing a
new standard at 42 CFR 483.75(r),
entitled ‘‘Hospice services.’’ At
§ 483.75(r)(1), we propose that LTC
facilities that choose to arrange for the
provision of hospice services through an
agreement with one or more Medicarecertified hospices, must have a signed
agreement with the hospice before any
hospice care is provided to any resident.
In addition, for those LTC facilities that
decline to arrange for the provision of
hospice services through an agreement
with a Medicare-certified hospice
provider, we propose that facilities
would be required to assist a resident in
transferring to a facility that would
arrange for the provision of these
services when the resident requested
such a transfer.
Requirements for discharge and
transfer from LTC facilities are specified
at § 483.12. The current regulations do
not specifically address a resident’s
request for transfer. Thus, an LTC
facility may accept a written or verbal
request for transfer. We propose that all
transfers would have to be documented
in the resident’s medical record.
Under this proposed rule, when
hospice care is provided by a Medicarecertified hospice in an LTC facility
through an agreement, the LTC facility
would be required to meet additional
requirements specific to written
agreements between the two entities.
The LTC facility would be required to
ensure that the hospice services met
professional standards and principles
that apply to individuals providing
services in the facility, and to ensure the
timeliness of the services. The term,
‘‘timeliness of services’’ means that the
LTC facility would be required to ensure
that, from the time the resident elected
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the hospice benefit until the services
were terminated, the Medicare-certified
hospice would provide hospice services
meeting the resident’s needs in a timely
manner, without any delay in the
provision of services for the resident.
We anticipate that LTC facilities would
address timeliness of services in their
agreements with hospices, based on
resident needs.
We propose requiring the signatures
of both an authorized representative of
the hospice and an authorized
representative of the LTC facility for
such agreements. These provisions
would have to be met before any
hospice care was furnished to an LTC
facility resident who elected the hospice
benefit.
The purpose of the written agreement
would be to ensure that the duties and
responsibilities of the hospice and the
LTC facility were clearly described. The
signature requirement would prevent
misunderstandings that could affect
resident care because a responsible
person representing each provider
would be aware of the respective roles
of each entity under the agreement. In
addition, the written agreement would
ensure that mechanisms were in place
to ensure needs of the resident were
identified and met, including the need
for high quality hospice care.
Under the agreement between the LTC
facility and the hospice, the hospice
would be responsible for making
decisions related to a resident’s care for
the palliation and management of the
terminal illness and related conditions,
because § 418.58 requires a hospice to
establish and maintain a written plan of
care for every individual admitted to its
hospice program. The LTC facility
would be responsible for making
decisions that were not related to a
resident’s terminal illness, because
§ 483.20(k) requires a LTC facility to
develop a comprehensive care plan for
each resident that meets the resident’s
medical, nursing, mental, and
psychosocial needs. Under this
proposed rule, the LTC facility would
also be responsible for ensuring the
hospice provider was informed about
changes made to the resident’s care
plan.
In general, a care plan is a document
that provides a ‘‘road map’’ for everyone
who is involved with a patient’s care.
The care planning process includes the
interdisciplinary team that will be
involved in the care of the patient. The
ultimate purpose of a care plan is to
guide all involved in the care of the
patient in providing the appropriate
treatment to ensure an optimal outcome
for the patient. A healthcare worker
should be able to find all the
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
information needed to care for an
individual in that person’s care plan.
To encourage the completeness of
patient information available to all staff
responsible for the care of the patient,
we are proposing to require that any
written agreements would need to
delineate: (1) Which services the
Hospice would provide and which
services the LTC facility would continue
to provide, as delineated in the care
plans; (2) how the LTC facility and
hospice would communicate to ensure
that needs of residents were being
addressed and met; and (3) the
conditions under which the LTC facility
would need to contact the hospice
immediately (specifically, this would
include significant changes in the
resident’s physical, mental, social, or
emotional status; clinical complications
that suggested a need to alter the care
plan; a need to transfer the resident
from the LTC facility for any condition
not related to the terminal condition; or
resident death).
As stated above, we are also
specifically proposing at § 483.75(r)
(2)(ii)(D) that the written agreement
identify a specific method of
communication between the LTC
facility staff and the hospice staff to
ensure the effectiveness and timeliness
of care. In an emergency, staff could
communicate orally, but we would
expect facilities to use best practices
and document the communication so
there could be appropriate follow-up.
Best practices are similar to the term
‘‘professional standards of quality,’’
which is defined in current guidelines
for surveyors in the State Operations
Manual (SOM) (https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/Downloads/
som107ap_pp_guidelines_ltcf.pdf).
The term ‘‘best practices’’ means that
services are provided according to
recognized standards of clinical
practice. Standards may apply to care
provided by a particular clinical
discipline or in a specific clinical
situation or setting. Standards regarding
quality care practices may be
established by professional
organizations, licensing boards,
accreditation bodies, and/or regulatory
agencies.
In addition to these requirements for
the written agreement, we are proposing
that the agreement include a provision
stating that the hospice assumes
responsibility for determining the
appropriate course of hospice care,
including changing the level of services
provided, if necessary. Among the LTC
facility’s responsibilities under the
written agreement, we are proposing
that the agreement include a provision
requiring the LTC facility to furnish 24-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
hour room and board care, meet the
resident’s personal care and nursing
needs in coordination with the hospice
representative, and ensure that the level
of care provided is appropriate based on
the individual resident’s needs.
We are proposing that, under the
written agreement, there also be a
delineation of the hospice’s
responsibilities, which include, but are
not limited to the following: Providing
medical direction and management of
the patient’s hospice care; nursing;
counseling (including spiritual, dietary
and bereavement); social work;
providing medical supplies, durable
medical equipment and drugs necessary
for the palliation of pain and symptoms
associated with the terminal illness and
related conditions; and all other hospice
services that are necessary for the care
of the resident’s terminal illness and
related conditions.
For example, the written agreement
might state that the hospice would be
responsible for determining the correct
medication for the terminal condition,
but the LTC facility staff would be
responsible for the medication’s
administration, because the LTC facility
provides 24-hour care for its residents.
Delineating responsibility for these key
services would ensure not only
continuity of care, but would also
guarantee appropriate care in a timely
manner. For example, if a resident were
in pain and needed medication, it
would be vital to the care of the resident
to have a clear delineation of each
provider’s specific responsibilities
regarding pain control, including all
steps from contacting the prescribing
practitioner to obtaining medication,
following the procedures set up by the
hospice, administering the medication
and monitoring its effectiveness.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(I) that
when the LTC facility personnel are
responsible for the administration of
prescribed therapies, including those
therapies determined by the hospice
and delineated in the hospice plan of
care, the LTC facility personnel may be
permitted to administer the therapies
where permitted by State law and as
specified by the LTC facility.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J) that
the LTC facility report all alleged
violations involving mistreatment,
neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and
physical abuse, including injuries of
unknown source, and misappropriation
of patient property by hospice
personnel, to the hospice administrator
immediately when the LTC facility
becomes aware of the alleged violation.
This requirement would assure that the
hospice is made aware of the alleged
violation in a timely manner so that it
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65285
can begin its own investigation and
implement its own intervention(s). We
note that under current regulations at
§ 483.13(c)(3), an LTC facility must
immediately provide protection for the
resident continuing throughout the
investigation. The hospice final rule
includes a similar provision at
§ 418.112(c)(8), which requires reporting
of alleged violations involving
mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental,
sexual, and physical abuse, including
injuries of unknown source, and
misappropriation of patient property by
LTC facility personnel to the facility
administrator. Such provisions enhance
LTC facility-hospice communication
and cooperation.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(K) that
the agreement include a delineation of
the responsibilities of the hospice to
offer bereavement services to LTC
facility staff. We propose at
§ 483.75(r)(3) that each LTC facility that
arranges for the provision of hospice
care through a written agreement
designate a member of the facility’s
interdisciplinary team to be responsible
for working with hospice
representatives to coordinate care
provided by the LTC facility staff and
the hospice staff. In addition, the
designated interdisciplinary team
member would be responsible for:
(1) Collaborating with hospice
representatives and coordinating LTC
facility staff participation in the hospice
care planning process for those
residents receiving these services;
(2) communicating with hospice
representatives and other healthcare
providers participating in the provision
of care for the terminal illness and
related conditions, as well as other
conditions, to ensure quality of care for
the patient and family; (3) ensuring that
the LTC facility communicates with the
hospice medical director, the patient’s
attending physician, and other
physicians participating in the
provision of care as needed to
coordinate the hospice care of the
hospice patient with the medical care
provided by other physicians; (4)
obtaining information from the hospice,
including the most recent hospice plan
of care specific to each patient, the
hospice election form, any advance
directives specific to each patient, and
physician certification and
recertification of the terminal illness
specific to each patient, as well as
names and contact information for
hospice personnel involved in hospice
care of each patient; instructions on
how to access the hospice’s 24-hour oncall system; hospice medication
information specific to each patient; and
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
65286
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
hospice physician and attending
physician (if any) orders specific to each
patient. In addition, we propose
requiring that the LTC facility staff
provide orientation to relevant hospice
staff about the facility’s policies and
procedures, including patient rights,
appropriate forms, and recordkeeping
requirements.
These proposed requirements would
apply regardless of the financial and/or
ownership relationship between the
LTC facility and the hospice.
Although we believe such orientation
is critical for the protection of residents
receiving hospice care, we understand
that it may be difficult for an LTC
facility to properly orient other hospice
staff who, in unexpected circumstances,
may occasionally provide coverage for a
member of the identified hospice
interdisciplinary group (IDG). Therefore,
we welcome public comment on how
LTC facilities can provide orientation
for hospice staff that is quick and
efficient but sufficient to protect
residents who receive hospice care.
Our intention is to ensure continuity
of care by involving designated
representatives from both the LTC
facility and the hospice in the hospice
care planning and hospice care
implementation processes, as well as in
LTC facility processes. The LTC facility
would have the flexibility to assign one
employee from the facility’s
interdisciplinary team as a coordinator
for all hospice residents, or assign a
separate coordinator for each hospice
resident. The designated coordinator
would ensure that the hospice plan of
care and the LTC facility plan of care
were implemented and updated as
appropriate. ‘‘Interdisciplinary team’’
refers to the professionals who work
together to provide services to the
resident, as defined at § 483.20(k)(2)(ii).
Interdisciplinary team members may
include physicians, nurses, therapists,
social workers, dietitians, and other
professionals, such as developmental
disabilities specialists. Involvement of
other disciplines is dependent upon
resident needs.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(4) that each
LTC facility that arranges for hospice
care under a written agreement with a
Medicare-certified hospice ensure that
each resident’s written plan of care
includes both the hospice plan of care
and a description of the services
furnished by the LTC facility to attain or
maintain the resident’s highest
practicable physical, mental, and
psychosocial well-being, as required at
§ 483.20(k). We expect that the LTC
facility’s designated coordinator would
work with hospice representatives to
meet this requirement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
We believe that including the hospice
plan of care (which addresses care for
the terminal condition and related
conditions) with the LTC facility care
plan would improve care coordination
and result in better implementation of
the overall plan of care. We believe
these proposed requirements would
facilitate effective communication and
coordination between the Medicarecertified hospice provider and the LTC
facility, ensuring that quality care
would be provided to residents
receiving hospice services. We note that
these proposed requirements would not
limit the scope of the relationship
between the Medicare-certified hospice
and the facility. Each party could add
provisions, subject to mutual agreement,
as long as they met or exceeded the
proposed requirements.
We anticipate that these proposed
requirements, aimed at improving the
coordination of care between LTC
facilities and Medicare-certified hospice
care providers, would lead to improved
consistency and quality of care for LTC
facility residents who elect to receive
hospice services.
In addition, we are taking this
opportunity to make a technical
correction due to an incorrect citation at
§ 483.10(n). The language states, ‘‘An
individual resident may self-administer
drugs if the interdisciplinary team, as
defined by § 483.20(d)(2)(ii), has
determined that this practice is safe.’’
However, § 483.20(d)(2)(ii) does not
exist. The correct citation is
§ 483.20(k)(2)(ii). In § 483.10(n), we are
proposing that the reference
‘‘§ 483.20(d)(2)(ii)’’ be revised to read
‘‘§ 483.20(k)(2)(ii).’’
3. Relevance to Existing Hospice
Requirements
Our intent in proposing these
requirements for LTC facilities is to
ensure they are in accord with our
existing requirements at § 418.112 for
hospices that provide services to
residents of LTC facilities. Our proposed
requirements for LTC facilities to have
agreements with hospices and to
collaborate and communicate with
hospices to provide care for LTC facility
residents largely parallels the language
and intent of the hospice requirements.
There are, however, instances where
employing the same language would not
reflect the distinct roles of each entity
or where we believe it is important to
provide clarity and detail without
disturbing the substance or the proper
interpretation of the requirements. In
some instances, we are proposing
different requirements because we
believe they are in the best interests of
the residents of LTC facilities. For
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
instance, at proposed § 483.75
(r)(2)(ii)(J), the LTC facility would be
required to report all alleged violations
by hospice personnel to the hospice
administrator immediately when the
LTC facility becomes aware of the
alleged violation. However, the hospice
is required at § 418.112(c)(8) to report
these same violations within 24 hours of
the hospice becoming aware of the
alleged violation.
The rationale for both these rules is to
require a written agreement between the
hospice and the LTC facility. (See
§ 418.112(c)(1) through (9) and proposed
§ 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(A) through (K).) While
the rules have slight differences in
language, substantively, the
requirements are the same. We believe
it is appropriate for the remainder of the
rule, including the coordination of care
requirements at proposed
§ 483.75(r)(3)(i)(v) and § 418.112(e), to
reflect the difference in the roles
between the LTC facility and the
hospice in providing resident care.
Therefore, we are proposing
requirements for communication and
collaboration specific to the LTC facility
that do not mirror the language in the
hospice requirements. Rather, the
proposed rule for LTC facilities would
complement the hospice requirements,
and our objective is that, together, these
rules will allow for better coordination
of care and quality of care for LTC
facility residents.
Notwithstanding our analysis that
these rules are complimentary and
substantively similar, and in view of the
slight differences between these rules,
we are requesting public comment on
whether the differences found in the
proposed rule would create a barrier to
forming agreements between LTC
facilities or interfere in coordination of
residents’ care between LTC facilities
and hospices.
II. Provisions of the Proposed
Regulations
As stated above, we are proposing a
new standard at 42 CFR 483.75(r),
entitled ‘‘Hospice services.’’ At
§ 483.75(r)(1), we propose that LTC
facilities may either arrange for the
provision of hospice services through an
agreement with one or more Medicarecertified hospice providers or not
arrange for such services and assist a
resident in transferring to a facility that
will arrange for the provision of these
services when the resident requests
such a transfer.
At § 483.75(r)(2)(i) and (ii), we
propose specific requirements for LTC
facilities choosing to have hospice care
provided by a Medicare-certified
hospice in their facility. The LTC
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
facility would be required to ensure that
the hospice services met professional
standards and principles that would
apply to individuals providing services
in the facility, and the timeliness of the
services. We also propose requiring that,
before any hospice care was provided to
a facility resident, a written agreement
would have to be signed by both an
individual authorized by the hospice
administration and an individual
authorized by the LTC facility
administration.
In addition, under this section, we are
proposing that the written agreement
would have to include, at the very least,
the following provisions:
• Under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(A), the
services the hospice will provide;
• Under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(B), the
hospice’s responsibilities for
determining the appropriate hospice
plan of care as specified in § 418.112(d)
of this chapter;
• Under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(C), the
services the LTC facility will continue
to provide, based on each resident’s care
plan; and
• Under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(D), a
communication process, including how
the communication will be documented
between the LTC facility and the
hospice provider, to ensure that the
needs of the resident are addressed and
met 24 hours per day.
Additionally, under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii),
we are proposing the inclusion of other
duties and responsibilities that must be
delineated by the LTC facility and the
hospice in their written agreement.
Under § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E), we are
proposing that the agreement contain a
provision that the LTC facility must
notify the hospice provider immediately
regarding—
• A significant change in the
resident’s physical, mental, social, or
emotional status;
• Any clinical complication(s) that
would suggest a need to alter the plan
of care;
• A condition unrelated to the
terminal condition that might require
transfer of the resident from the facility;
or
• The resident’s death.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(F) that
the hospice must assume responsibility
for determining the appropriate course
of hospice care, including the
determination to change the level of
services provided.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(G) that
the LTC facility must continue to
provide 24-hour room and board care,
meet the resident’s personal care and
nursing needs in coordination with the
hospice representative, and ensure that
the level of care provided is appropriate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
based on the individual resident’s
needs.
At § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(H), we are
proposing that the written agreement
include a delineation of additional
hospice responsibilities, which include,
but are not limited to:
• Providing medical direction and
management of the patient.
• Nursing.
• Counseling (including spiritual,
dietary, and bereavement).
• Social work; providing medical
supplies, durable medical equipment,
and drugs necessary for the palliation of
pain and symptoms associated with the
terminal illness and related conditions.
• All other hospice services that are
necessary for the care of the resident’s
terminal illness and related conditions.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(I) that
the agreement include a provision that
the hospice may use LTC facility
personnel, where permitted by State law
and as specified by the LTC facility, to
assist in the administration of
prescribed therapies included in the
hospice plan of care.
We are also specifically proposing, at
§ 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J), that the written
agreement contain a provision that the
LTC facility must report all alleged
violations involving mistreatment,
neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and
physical abuse, including injuries of
unknown source, and misappropriation
of patient property by hospice
personnel, to the hospice administrator
immediately when the LTC facility
becomes aware of the alleged violation.
We propose at § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(K) that
the agreement must also include a
delineation of the responsibilities of the
hospice to offer bereavement services to
LTC facility staff.
At § 483.75(r)(3)(i) through (v), we are
proposing that the LTC facility that
arranges for the provision of hospice
care under a written agreement must
designate a member of the facility’s
interdisciplinary team to be responsible
for working with hospice
representatives to coordinate care
provided by the LTC facility and
hospice staff to the resident. This
individual must be responsible for:
(1) Collaborating with hospice
representatives and coordinating LTC
facility staff participation in the hospice
care planning process for those
residents receiving these services;
(2) Communicating with hospice
representatives and other healthcare
providers participating in the provision
of care for the terminal illness, related
conditions, and other conditions to
ensure quality of care for the patient and
family;
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65287
(3) Ensuring that the LTC facility
communicates with the hospice medical
director, the patient’s attending
physician, and other physicians
participating in the provision of care to
the patient as needed to coordinate the
hospice care of the hospice patient with
the medical care provided by other
physicians;
(4) Obtaining pertinent information
from the hospice (that is, the most
recent hospice plan of care specific to
each patient; hospice election form and
any advance directives specific to each
patient; physician certification and
recertification of the terminal illness
specific to each patient; names and
contact information for hospice
personnel involved in hospice care of
each patient; instructions on how to
access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call
system; hospice medication information
specific to each patient; and hospice
physician and attending physician (if
any) orders specific to each patient); and
(5) Ensuring that the LTC facility staff
provide orientation in the policies and
procedures of the facility, including
patient rights, appropriate forms, and
record keeping requirements, to hospice
staff furnishing care to LTC residents.
At § 483.75(r)(4), we are proposing
that each LTC facility providing hospice
care under a written agreement must
ensure that each resident’s written plan
of care includes both the hospice plan
of care and a description of the services
furnished by the LTC facility to attain or
maintain the resident’s highest
practicable physical, mental, and
psychosocial well-being, as required at
§ 483.20(k).
As stated in the previous section
above, we are also taking this
opportunity to make a technical
correction due to an incorrect citation at
§ 483.10(n). In § 483.10(n), we are
proposing that the reference
‘‘§ 483.20(d)(2)(ii)’’ be revised to read
‘‘§ 483.20(k)(2)(ii).’’
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 60day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In order to fairly evaluate
whether an information collection
should be approved by OMB, section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 requires that we
solicit comment on the following issues:
• The need for the information
collection and its usefulness in carrying
out the proper functions of our agency.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
65288
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
information collection burden.
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
• Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on
each of these issues for the following
sections of this document that contain
information collection requirements
(ICRs):
Proposed § 483.75(r)(2)(ii) states that
if hospice care is provided in an LTC
facility through an agreement with a
Medicare-certified hospice, the LTC
facility must have a written agreement
with the Medicare-certified hospice
before care is furnished to any resident.
An LTC facility would be required to
have only one written agreement with
each hospice that provides services in
the facility. This proposed rule would
not require an LTC facility to have an
individual agreement with a hospice for
each resident receiving hospice services.
Therefore, the burden associated with
this requirement is the time and effort
necessary for an LTC facility to develop
and finalize one written agreement.
Initially, the development of an
agreement would require staff time;
however, it would also require
additional staff time to coordinate the
care between the hospice and the LTC
facility.
We estimate the number of hours to
develop and finalize a written
agreement to be approximately 5 hours
the first year. The estimated burden
associated with the first year is 80,695
hours or $5,512,275. The current
requirements at § 483.75(h) ‘‘Use of
Outside Resources,’’ requires a written
agreement when contracting for outside
services. Therefore, we would expect
that a facility would modify an existing
agreement to make it specific to hospice
services. Review and revision of an
already existing agreement would be
expected to take less time thereafter. We
estimate that it would take 2 hours to
review and revise the agreement
annually. The estimated annual burden
associated with each successive year
after the first is 32,278 hours or
$2,204,910. We have based our
projections of the hourly cost on the rate
for a staff lawyer at $68.31 an hour,
which includes fringe benefits
(estimated to be 25 percent of the
salary). (Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Occupational Employment
Statistics Survey.)
Proposed sections
483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E)(1) through (4) state
that the LTC must notify the hospice
immediately about—
• A significant change in the
resident’s physical, mental, social, or
emotional status;
• Clinical complications that suggest
a need to alter the plan of care;
• A need to transfer the resident from
the facility for any condition that is not
related to the terminal condition; or
• The resident’s death.
The burden associated with these
requirements is the time and effort it
would take the LTC facility to provide
notification to the hospice. We estimate
it would take approximately 5 minutes
per notification. We anticipate that this
would affect 16,139 LTC facilities. If
each LTC facility makes 1 notification
each month, the burden associated with
this requirement is 16,139 annual
burden hours and the cost would be
$504,344 annually, based on an hourly
rate of $31.25 for a blended salary of a
registered nurse and licensed practical
nurse that includes fringe benefits, since
either practitioner could notify the
hospice of stated changes. (Source:
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational
Employment Statistics Survey).
Proposed § 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J) states
that under the agreement, the LTC
facility must report all alleged violations
involving mistreatment, neglect, or
verbal, mental, sexual, and physical
abuse, including injuries of unknown
source, and misappropriation of patient
property by hospice personnel to the
hospice administrator immediately
when the LTC facility becomes aware of
the alleged violation. The burden
associated with this requirement is the
time and effort it would take the LTC
facility to report this information to the
hospice administrator. We estimate it
would take approximately 10 minutes
per incident. We anticipate that this
would affect 16,139 LTC facilities. If
each LTC facility made one report per
month, the burden associated with this
requirement would be 32,278 annual
burden hours and the cost would be
$1,032,895 annually based on an hourly
rate of $32 for a registered nurse that
includes fringe benefits. (Source: Bureau
of Labor Statistics, Occupational
Employment Statistics Survey)
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
Total
labor
cost of
reporting
($)
Regulation section(s)
OMB control
No.
Respondents
Responses
Burden per
response
(hours)
Total annual
burden
(hours)
Hourly labor
cost of
reporting
($)
Total capital/maintenance costs
($)
§ 483.75(r)(2)(ii) .......................
0938—New
§ 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E)(1–4) ..........
§ 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J) ...................
0938—New
0938—New
16,139
16,139
16,139
16,139
16,139
16,139
193,668
193,668
5
2
.08333
.16666
80,695*
**32,278
16,139
32,278
68.31
68.31
31.25
32.00
5,512,275
2,204,910
504,344
1,032,895
0
0
0
0
5,512,275
2,204,910
504,344
1,032,895
Total .................................
....................
16,139
209,807
....................
161,390
....................
....................
....................
9,254,424
Total cost
($)
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
* One time burden estimate for initial development of written agreement.
** Annual burden estimate associated with updating existing written agreements.
If you comment on these information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements, please do either of the
following:
1. Submit your comments
electronically as specified in the
ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule;
or
2. Mail copies to the address specified
in the ADDRESSES section of this
proposed rule and to the Office of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: CMS Desk Officer, CMS–
3140–P.
Fax: (202) 395–6974; or
E-mail: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.
govIV.
Response to Comments
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 (September 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of
the Social Security Act, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism, and the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). This rule does not qualify
as a major rule, as the estimated
economic impact is $7,049,515 the first
year and $3,742,150 thereafter.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses, if a rule has a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. For purposes of the RFA, small
entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
government jurisdictions. The great
majority of hospitals and most other
health care providers and suppliers are
small entities, either by being nonprofit
organizations or by meeting the SBA
definition of a small business (having
revenues of less than $7.0 million to
$34.5 million in any 1 year). For
purposes of the RFA, the majority of
hospitals, LTC facilities and hospices
are considered to be small entities.
Individuals and States are not included
in the definition of a small entity. A rule
has a significant economic impact on
the small entities it affects, if it
significantly affects their total costs or
revenues. Under statute, we are required
to assess the compliance burden the
regulation will impose on small entities.
Generally, we analyze the burden in
terms of the impact it will have on
entities’ costs if these are identifiable or
revenues. As a matter of sound analytic
methodology, to the extent that data are
available, we attempt to stratify entities
by major operating characteristics such
as size and geographic location. If the
average annual impact on small entities
is 3 to 5 percent or more, it is to be
considered significant. We estimate that
these requirements would cost $437
($7,049,515/16,139 facilities) per facility
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
initially and $232 ($3,742,150/16,139
facilities) thereafter. This clearly is
much below 1 percent; therefore, we do
not anticipate it to have a significant
impact. We do not have any data related
to the number of LTC facilities
contracting hospice care through an
outside hospice provider; however, we
are aware through annual surveys that
not all LTC facilities arrange for the
provision of hospice care.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 603 of the
RFA. For the purposes of section
1102(b) of the Act, we define a small
rural hospital as a hospital that is
located outside of a metropolitan
statistical area and has fewer than 100
beds. This rule would impact only longterm care facilities. Therefore, the
Secretary has determined that this
proposed rule would not have any
impact on the operations of small rural
hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
also requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2010, that
threshold is approximately $135
million. This rule would not have a
significant impact on the governments
mentioned or on private sector costs.
The estimated economic effect of this
rule is $7,049,515 the first year and
$3,742,150 thereafter. These estimates
are derived from our analysis of burden
associated with these requirements in
section III, ‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements.’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This rule will not have any effect on
State or local governments.
B. Anticipated Effects
1. Effects on LTC Facilities
The purpose of this rule is to ensure
the coordination of care for LTC facility
residents who elect hospice services.
The coordination of care is anticipated
to result in better outcomes related to
quality of care and quality of life for
residents. With appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65289
coordination of care as proposed in this
rule, we anticipate improved outcomes
through more efficient coordination of
care between the LTC facility staff and
hospice staff, a decrease in duplication
of services provided, and improved
resident care.
2. Effects on Other Providers
We expect improved consistency in
the provision of services to residents
receiving hospice care in an LTC
facility. We anticipate that primarily
only LTC facilities and Medicarecertified hospice providers would be
affected, as this proposed rule would be
expected to improve coordination of
care between LTC facilities and
Medicare-certified hospice providers. In
instances where a patient is transferred
to the hospital for care unrelated to their
terminal illness, the hospital should be
notified that the patient has elected
hospice care.
3. Effects on the Medicare and Medicaid
Programs
An Office of the Inspector General
(OIG) report released in 1997 found that
‘‘contractual arrangements between
hospice providers and nursing homes
present vulnerabilities for inappropriate
use of excessive Medicare and Medicaid
payments being made to hospice
providers or to nursing homes’’ (U.S.
HHS OIG, Hospice and Nursing Home
Contractual Relationships, 1997 Nov.,
OEI–05–95–00251). We anticipate that
the proposed rule would decrease these
vulnerabilities, as the services provided
by both the LTC facility and the
Medicare-certified hospice would be
clearly defined.
C. Alternatives Considered
We considered the effects of not
addressing specific requirements for the
provision of hospice care in LTC
facilities. However, we believe that to
improve quality and ensure consistency
in the provision of hospice services in
LTC facilities, it is important to
delineate clear responsibilities for
Medicare-certified hospice providers
and LTC facilities. We expect that these
requirements would result in
improvement in the quality of care
provided to LTC residents receiving
hospice services.
D. Conclusion
This proposed rule for a written
agreement when arranging for the
provision of hospice services in LTC
facilities is intended to improve the
continuity and quality of care provided
to terminally ill LTC facility residents.
It is consistent with the
Administration’s efforts toward broad-
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
65290
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
based improvements in the quality of
health care furnished by Medicare and
Medicaid providers.
This proposed rule identifies an LTC
facility’s choices if a resident elects to
receive hospice care. This proposed rule
also clarifies the responsibility of the
facility that chooses not to arrange for
the provision of hospice services at the
facility through an agreement with a
Medicare-certified hospice. These
facilities must assist the resident in
transferring to a facility that will arrange
for the provision of hospice services
when a resident requests a transfer.
This proposed rule would ensure that
the duties and responsibilities of a
hospice are clearly articulated if the
hospice provides care in an LTC facility.
Therefore, in order to ensure that
quality hospice care is provided to LTC
residents we believe it is essential to
add these proposed requirements to the
LTC regulations.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 483
Grant programs—health, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health
records, Medicaid, Medicare, Nursing
homes, Nutrition, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services proposes to amend
42 CFR Chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 483—REQUIREMENTS FOR
STATES AND LONG TERM CARE
FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 483
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
Subpart B—Requirements for Long
Term Care Facilities
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 483.10
[Amended]
2. In § 483.10(n), the reference
‘‘§ 483.20(d)(2)(ii)’’ is revised to read
‘‘§ 483.20(k)(2)(ii).’’
3. Section 483.75 is amended by
adding paragraph (r) to read as
follows—
§ 483.75
Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) Hospice services. (1) A long-term
care (LTC) facility may either—
(i) Arrange for the provision of
hospice services through an agreement
with one or more Medicare-certified
hospices; or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
(ii) Not arrange for the provision of
hospice services at the facility through
an agreement with a Medicare-certified
hospice and assist the resident in
transferring to a facility that will arrange
for the provision of hospice services
when a resident requests a transfer.
(2) If hospice care is provided in an
LTC facility through an agreement as
specified in paragraph (r)(1)(i) of this
section with a hospice, the LTC facility
must:
(i) Ensure that the hospice services
meet professional standards and
principles that apply to individuals
providing services in the facility, and to
the timeliness of the services.
(ii) Have a written agreement with the
hospice that is signed by an authorized
representative of the hospice and an
authorized representative of the LTC
facility before hospice care is furnished
to any resident. The written agreement
must set out at least the following:
(A) The services the hospice will
provide.
(B) The hospice’s responsibilities for
determining the appropriate hospice
plan of care as specified in § 418.112(d)
of this chapter.
(C) The services the LTC facility will
continue to provide, based on each
resident’s care plan.
(D) A communication process,
including how the communication will
be documented between the LTC facility
and the hospice provider, to ensure that
the needs of the resident are addressed
and met 24 hours per day.
(E) A provision that the LTC facility
immediately notifies the hospice
regarding—
(1) A significant change in the
resident’s physical, mental, social, or
emotional status;
(2) Clinical complications that suggest
a need to alter the plan of care;
(3) A need to transfer the resident
from the facility for any condition that
is not related to the terminal condition;
or
(4) The resident’s death.
(F) A provision stating that the
hospice assumes responsibility for
determining the appropriate course of
hospice care, including the
determination to change the level of
services provided.
(G) An agreement that it is the LTC
facility’s responsibility to furnish 24hour room and board care, meet the
resident’s personal care and nursing
needs in coordination with the hospice
representative, and ensure that the level
of care provided is appropriate based on
the individual resident’s needs.
(H) A delineation of the hospice’s
responsibilities, which include, but are
not limited to, providing medical
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
direction and management of the
patient; nursing; counseling (including
spiritual, dietary, and bereavement);
social work; providing medical
supplies, durable medical equipment,
and drugs necessary for the palliation of
pain and symptoms associated with the
terminal illness and related conditions;
and all other hospice services that are
necessary for the care of the resident’s
terminal illness and related conditions.
(I) A provision that when the LTC
facility personnel are responsible for the
administration of prescribed therapies,
including those therapies determined by
the hospice and delineated in the
hospice plan of care, the LTC facility
personnel may administer the therapies
where permitted by State law and as
specified by the LTC facility.
(J) A provision stating that the LTC
facility must report all alleged violations
involving mistreatment, neglect, or
verbal, mental, sexual, and physical
abuse, including injuries of unknown
source, and misappropriation of patient
property by hospice personnel, to the
hospice administrator immediately
when the LTC facility becomes aware of
the alleged violation.
(K) A delineation of the
responsibilities of the hospice and the
LTC facility to provide bereavement
services to LTC facility staff.
(3) Each LTC facility arranging for the
provision of hospice care under a
written agreement must designate a
member of the facility’s
interdisciplinary team to be responsible
for working with hospice
representatives to coordinate care to the
resident provided by the LTC facility
staff and hospice staff. The designated
interdisciplinary team member is
responsible for:
(i) Collaborating with hospice
representatives and coordinating LTC
facility staff participation in the hospice
care planning process for those
residents receiving these services.
(ii) Communicating with hospice
representatives and other healthcare
providers participating in the provision
of care for the terminal illness, related
conditions, and other conditions, to
ensure quality of care for the patient and
family.
(iii) Ensuring that the LTC facility
communicates with the hospice medical
director, the patient’s attending
physician, and other physicians
participating in the provision of care to
the patient as needed to coordinate the
hospice care with the medical care
provided by other physicians.
(iv) Obtaining the following
information from the hospice:
(A) The most recent hospice plan of
care specific to each patient;
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(B) Hospice election form and any
advance directives specific to each
patient;
(C) Physician certification and
recertification of the terminal illness
specific to each patient;
(D) Names and contact information for
hospice personnel involved in hospice
care of each patient;
(E) Instructions on how to access the
hospice’s 24-hour on-call system;
(F) Hospice medication information
specific to each patient; and
(G) Hospice physician and attending
physician (if any) orders specific to each
patient.
(v) Ensuring that the LTC facility staff
provide orientation in the policies and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
procedures of the facility, including
patient rights, appropriate forms, and
record keeping requirements, to hospice
staff furnishing care to LTC residents.
(4) Each LTC facility providing
hospice care under a written agreement
must ensure that each resident’s written
plan of care includes both the most
recent hospice plan of care and a
description of the services furnished by
the LTC facility to attain or maintain the
resident’s highest practicable physical,
mental, and psychosocial well-being, as
required at § 483.20(k).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
65291
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: May 27, 2010.
Donald M. Berwick,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: October 1, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–26395 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65282-65291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 483
[CMS-3140-P]
RIN 0938-AP32
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Requirements for Long Term Care
Facilities; Hospice Services
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would revise the requirements that an
institution would have to meet in order to qualify to participate as a
skilled nursing facility (SNF) in the Medicare program, or as a nursing
facility (NF) in the Medicaid program. We are proposing these
requirements to ensure that long-term care (LTC) facilities (that is,
SNFs and NFs) that chose to arrange for the provision of hospice care
through an agreement with one or more Medicare-certified hospice
providers would have in place a written agreement with the hospice that
specified the roles and responsibilities of each entity.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on December 21,
2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-3140-P. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
``Comment or Submission'' and enter the file code to find the document
accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and
two copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-3140-P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD
21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-3140-P, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one original and two copies) before the
close of the comment period to either of the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by following the
instructions at the end of the ``Collection of Information
Requirements'' section in this document.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trish Brooks, (410) 786-4561. Marcia
Newton, (410) 786-5265. Jeannie Miller, (410) 786-3164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
According to CMS data, at any point in time, approximately 1.4
million elderly and disabled nursing home residents are receiving care
in nearly 16,000 Medicare- and Medicaid-certified Long-Term Care (LTC)
facilities
[[Page 65283]]
in the United States. More than 20 percent of older Americans die in
nursing homes. (Johnson, Sandra H., Hastings Center Report, Making Room
for Dying: End of Life Care in Nursing Homes; November/December 2005,
Special Report 35 (6), S37-S41.) Therefore, providing care at the end
of life, particularly palliative care, is an important part of nursing
home care.
Palliative care means patient and family-centered care that
optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating
suffering. Palliative care in an LTC facility involves addressing
physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs, as well
as facilitating resident autonomy, access to information, and choice
throughout the continuum of illness. Palliative care independent of the
hospice benefit may also be provided by LTC facilities, which may
eliminate the need for hospice services for their residents.
Hospice care is provided for terminally ill individuals with a
prognosis of 6 months or less if their terminal illness runs its normal
course. These patients have elected to forgo curative care and wish to
remain in their place of residence. A Medicare-certified hospice
provides services in family homes, LTC facilities, and any other
dwelling that individuals call ``home.'' Hospice care may also be
provided while individuals are hospitalized. According to a March 2000
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation's (ASPE)
study, entitled ``Use of Medicare's Hospice Benefit by Nursing Facility
Residents,'' nursing facilities served approximately 35 percent of all
hospice beneficiaries in some markets. The study concluded, ``hospice
in nursing homes is a very prevalent phenomenon,'' but added that
``Guidelines are * * * needed to clarify the need for nursing
facilities to provide palliative care and the roles and
responsibilities of hospices and nursing facilities when treating a
hospice patient. Minimal contract provisions affecting the two types of
providers when treating residents enrolled in hospice are needed as
well.'' (https://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2000/samhbes.htm.)
Under current regulations, an LTC facility may choose to have a
written agreement with one or more hospice providers to provide hospice
care to a Medicare eligible resident who wishes to elect the hospice
benefit. However, if the facility chooses not to contract with a
Medicare-certified hospice to provide hospice services for the resident
who wishes to elect the benefit, the LTC facility is responsible for
assisting the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange
for the provision of such services, as requested by the resident. (See
42 CFR 483.12(a)(2)(i), Transfer and discharge requirements.)
Hospice care for residents who choose to live in various types of
facilities has come under scrutiny as a result of a variety of
findings, including Operation Restore Trust (ORT) activities, Office of
Inspector General (OIG) reports from 1997, (U.S. D.H.H.S. OIG,
``Hospice and Nursing Home Contractual Relationships,'' Nov. 1997, OEI-
05-95-00251, https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-05-95-00251.pdf) and
1998 (OIG Special Fraud Alert, ``Fraud and Abuse, Nursing Home
Arrangements with Hospices,'' Mar. 1998 https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/alertsandbulletins/hospice.pdf ), and a 2000 report from the
Department's Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy and the Urban
Institute; ``Synthesis and Analysis of Medicare Hospice Benefit
Executive Summary and Recommendations.'' (Harvell, J.; Jackson, B.;
Gage, B.; Miller, S.; and Mor, V., Mar. 2000, https://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2000/samhbes.htm). In addition, based on feedback to CMS
from state surveyors, there is a lack of coordination between LTC
facilities and Medicare-certified hospice providers.
We believe there is a lack of clear regulatory direction regarding
the responsibilities of providers in caring for LTC facility residents
who receive hospice care from a Medicare-certified hospice provider,
which could result in duplicative or missing services. We believe this
problem would be remedied by a regulatory requirement for a written
agreement between the two types of entities when they are both involved
in the care of a Medicare beneficiary. A written agreement would help
ensure that required services are provided to beneficiaries and protect
beneficiary health and safety, which could be endangered by a lack of
coordination between hospice and LTC providers. Such an agreement
ensures that care is coordinated by specifying what services each
provider will provide. For instance, an LTC facility is considered a
resident's home. An agreement between the providers would specify that
the LTC facility must furnish room and board and meet personal care and
nursing needs, while the hospice must provide services that are
necessary for the care of the resident's terminal illness, such as
counseling and palliation of pain.
A. Statutory Authority
1. Overview
Sections 1819(b)(4)(A)(i) and 1919(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Social
Security Act (the Act) state that, to the extent needed to fulfill all
plans of care described in sections 1819(b)(2) and 1919(b)(2) of the
Act, a skilled nursing facility or nursing facility must provide (or
arrange for the provision of) nursing and related services and
specialized rehabilitative services to attain or maintain the highest
practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each
resident. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1986
permitted States to add a hospice benefit to their State Medicaid
plans. The original legislation (OBRA '86), adding the optional hospice
benefit, specified, ``hospice care may be provided to an individual
while such individual is a resident of a skilled nursing facility or
intermediate care facility'' (Pub. L. 99-272, Sec. 9505(a)(2)).
This proposed rule would set forth requirements consistent with
requirements in the June 5, 2008 final rule (73 FR 32088) entitled
``Medicare and Medicaid Program: Hospice Conditions of Participation.''
The hospice care final rule set forth new requirements that a Medicare-
certified hospice provider must meet when it provides services,
including the provision of hospice care to residents of an LTC facility
who elect the hospice benefit. Section 418.112(e) specifies what must
be included in a written agreement between a Medicare-certified hospice
provider and an LTC facility. We propose making the requirements for
LTC facilities consistent with the June 2008 final rule. To this end,
the language in this proposed rule was crafted to mirror the hospice
final rule as much as possible to ensure that both entities are held
equally responsible for the written agreement.
This proposed rule would also support current LTC requirements that
protect a resident's right to a dignified existence, self-
determination, and communication with, and access to, persons and
services inside and outside the facility.
2. Rationale for New Requirements
A 2002 Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services'
(DHHS) Advisory Committee Report and a 2003 Hastings Center Report have
identified a lack of coordination between LTC facilities and Medicare-
certified hospice providers. In 2002, the Secretary of DHHS' Advisory
Committee on Regulatory Reform developed
[[Page 65284]]
recommendations to address key regulatory issues. One of the
recommendations of the DHHS Secretary's Advisory Committee report was
to clarify the relationship between nursing facilities and hospice
providers. The DHHS Secretary's Advisory Committee report stated that
there was a need to ``reconcile conflicts in regulations and/or
guidance that prevent clear delineation as to which entity (LTC
facility or the hospice) is required to have the lead in providing
required end-of-life care to SNF residents once they elect their
hospice benefit.'' The report recommended revising guidance and
procedures to recognize hospice care in the context of the SNF survey
protocol. The report further recommended that, if necessary, CMS revise
the CoPs for Medicare-certified hospices, SNFs, and NFs to ensure
beneficiaries' access to the full range of benefits to which they are
statutorily entitled, and to ensure the appropriate entity is
accountable for care that should be provided, which is based on a
resident's unique needs (https://regreform.hhs.gov/finalreport.htm).
An article in the March/April 2003 Hastings Center Report, ``Is
discontinuity in palliative care a culpable act of omission?'' stated,
``Hospice patients sign up to obtain palliative care, regardless of the
care setting in which they reside. Part of honoring this obligation
requires a hospice to attend to the needs of continuity when the site
of care does change.'' The article further stated that, while most non-
hospice healthcare providers do not follow their terminally ill
patients to other care sites, hospice staff are required by the
Medicare CoPs at Sec. 418.56, as well as by industry and accreditation
standards, to both provide and oversee palliative care as the patient
moves across care sites with which the hospice has a contractual
relationship. The article concludes that continuity of care is
optimized by care management across care sites. (True Ryndes, Linda
Emanuel, The Hastings Center Report, Hastings-on-Hudson: March/April
2003, page S45). (https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2103/is_2_33/ai_n7517557/?tag=content;col1)
This proposed rule, therefore, seeks to clarify the role of the LTC
facility and the Medicare-certified hospice by requiring clear
delineation of each provider's responsibility for maintaining
continuity of care.
The problems LTC facilities and hospices have with the coordination
of care, as identified in both the Hastings Center Report and the HHS
Secretary's Advisory Committee report, is a direct result of the lack
of Medicare requirements specifically related to the provision of
contracted hospice care in the current regulatory requirements for LTC
facilities. The overall intent of this proposed rule is to promote
consistency and continuity of care by requiring that a written
agreement between the LTC facility and the Medicare-certified hospice
provider clearly identify the responsibilities of each entity when
arranging for the provision of hospice services to an LTC resident who
elects the hospice benefit. This agreement would be required even if
the Medicare-certified hospice and the LTC facility were under common
control and/or ownership.
Therefore, in light of the HHS Secretary's Advisory Committee
report and Hastings Center Report, and to ensure quality hospice care
is provided in a coordinated manner to LTC facility residents who have
elected to receive hospice services, we are proposing a new standard at
42 CFR 483.75(r), entitled ``Hospice services.'' At Sec. 483.75(r)(1),
we propose that LTC facilities that choose to arrange for the provision
of hospice services through an agreement with one or more Medicare-
certified hospices, must have a signed agreement with the hospice
before any hospice care is provided to any resident. In addition, for
those LTC facilities that decline to arrange for the provision of
hospice services through an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice
provider, we propose that facilities would be required to assist a
resident in transferring to a facility that would arrange for the
provision of these services when the resident requested such a
transfer.
Requirements for discharge and transfer from LTC facilities are
specified at Sec. 483.12. The current regulations do not specifically
address a resident's request for transfer. Thus, an LTC facility may
accept a written or verbal request for transfer. We propose that all
transfers would have to be documented in the resident's medical record.
Under this proposed rule, when hospice care is provided by a
Medicare-certified hospice in an LTC facility through an agreement, the
LTC facility would be required to meet additional requirements specific
to written agreements between the two entities. The LTC facility would
be required to ensure that the hospice services met professional
standards and principles that apply to individuals providing services
in the facility, and to ensure the timeliness of the services. The
term, ``timeliness of services'' means that the LTC facility would be
required to ensure that, from the time the resident elected the hospice
benefit until the services were terminated, the Medicare-certified
hospice would provide hospice services meeting the resident's needs in
a timely manner, without any delay in the provision of services for the
resident. We anticipate that LTC facilities would address timeliness of
services in their agreements with hospices, based on resident needs.
We propose requiring the signatures of both an authorized
representative of the hospice and an authorized representative of the
LTC facility for such agreements. These provisions would have to be met
before any hospice care was furnished to an LTC facility resident who
elected the hospice benefit.
The purpose of the written agreement would be to ensure that the
duties and responsibilities of the hospice and the LTC facility were
clearly described. The signature requirement would prevent
misunderstandings that could affect resident care because a responsible
person representing each provider would be aware of the respective
roles of each entity under the agreement. In addition, the written
agreement would ensure that mechanisms were in place to ensure needs of
the resident were identified and met, including the need for high
quality hospice care.
Under the agreement between the LTC facility and the hospice, the
hospice would be responsible for making decisions related to a
resident's care for the palliation and management of the terminal
illness and related conditions, because Sec. 418.58 requires a hospice
to establish and maintain a written plan of care for every individual
admitted to its hospice program. The LTC facility would be responsible
for making decisions that were not related to a resident's terminal
illness, because Sec. 483.20(k) requires a LTC facility to develop a
comprehensive care plan for each resident that meets the resident's
medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. Under this proposed
rule, the LTC facility would also be responsible for ensuring the
hospice provider was informed about changes made to the resident's care
plan.
In general, a care plan is a document that provides a ``road map''
for everyone who is involved with a patient's care. The care planning
process includes the interdisciplinary team that will be involved in
the care of the patient. The ultimate purpose of a care plan is to
guide all involved in the care of the patient in providing the
appropriate treatment to ensure an optimal outcome for the patient. A
healthcare worker should be able to find all the
[[Page 65285]]
information needed to care for an individual in that person's care
plan.
To encourage the completeness of patient information available to
all staff responsible for the care of the patient, we are proposing to
require that any written agreements would need to delineate: (1) Which
services the Hospice would provide and which services the LTC facility
would continue to provide, as delineated in the care plans; (2) how the
LTC facility and hospice would communicate to ensure that needs of
residents were being addressed and met; and (3) the conditions under
which the LTC facility would need to contact the hospice immediately
(specifically, this would include significant changes in the resident's
physical, mental, social, or emotional status; clinical complications
that suggested a need to alter the care plan; a need to transfer the
resident from the LTC facility for any condition not related to the
terminal condition; or resident death).
As stated above, we are also specifically proposing at Sec.
483.75(r) (2)(ii)(D) that the written agreement identify a specific
method of communication between the LTC facility staff and the hospice
staff to ensure the effectiveness and timeliness of care. In an
emergency, staff could communicate orally, but we would expect
facilities to use best practices and document the communication so
there could be appropriate follow-up. Best practices are similar to the
term ``professional standards of quality,'' which is defined in current
guidelines for surveyors in the State Operations Manual (SOM) (https://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/Downloads/som107ap_pp_guidelines_ltcf.pdf).
The term ``best practices'' means that services are provided
according to recognized standards of clinical practice. Standards may
apply to care provided by a particular clinical discipline or in a
specific clinical situation or setting. Standards regarding quality
care practices may be established by professional organizations,
licensing boards, accreditation bodies, and/or regulatory agencies.
In addition to these requirements for the written agreement, we are
proposing that the agreement include a provision stating that the
hospice assumes responsibility for determining the appropriate course
of hospice care, including changing the level of services provided, if
necessary. Among the LTC facility's responsibilities under the written
agreement, we are proposing that the agreement include a provision
requiring the LTC facility to furnish 24-hour room and board care, meet
the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the
hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is
appropriate based on the individual resident's needs.
We are proposing that, under the written agreement, there also be a
delineation of the hospice's responsibilities, which include, but are
not limited to the following: Providing medical direction and
management of the patient's hospice care; nursing; counseling
(including spiritual, dietary and bereavement); social work; providing
medical supplies, durable medical equipment and drugs necessary for the
palliation of pain and symptoms associated with the terminal illness
and related conditions; and all other hospice services that are
necessary for the care of the resident's terminal illness and related
conditions.
For example, the written agreement might state that the hospice
would be responsible for determining the correct medication for the
terminal condition, but the LTC facility staff would be responsible for
the medication's administration, because the LTC facility provides 24-
hour care for its residents. Delineating responsibility for these key
services would ensure not only continuity of care, but would also
guarantee appropriate care in a timely manner. For example, if a
resident were in pain and needed medication, it would be vital to the
care of the resident to have a clear delineation of each provider's
specific responsibilities regarding pain control, including all steps
from contacting the prescribing practitioner to obtaining medication,
following the procedures set up by the hospice, administering the
medication and monitoring its effectiveness.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(I) that when the LTC facility
personnel are responsible for the administration of prescribed
therapies, including those therapies determined by the hospice and
delineated in the hospice plan of care, the LTC facility personnel may
be permitted to administer the therapies where permitted by State law
and as specified by the LTC facility.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J) that the LTC facility
report all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or
verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of
unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by hospice
personnel, to the hospice administrator immediately when the LTC
facility becomes aware of the alleged violation. This requirement would
assure that the hospice is made aware of the alleged violation in a
timely manner so that it can begin its own investigation and implement
its own intervention(s). We note that under current regulations at
Sec. 483.13(c)(3), an LTC facility must immediately provide protection
for the resident continuing throughout the investigation. The hospice
final rule includes a similar provision at Sec. 418.112(c)(8), which
requires reporting of alleged violations involving mistreatment,
neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including
injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by
LTC facility personnel to the facility administrator. Such provisions
enhance LTC facility-hospice communication and cooperation.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(K) that the agreement include
a delineation of the responsibilities of the hospice to offer
bereavement services to LTC facility staff. We propose at Sec.
483.75(r)(3) that each LTC facility that arranges for the provision of
hospice care through a written agreement designate a member of the
facility's interdisciplinary team to be responsible for working with
hospice representatives to coordinate care provided by the LTC facility
staff and the hospice staff. In addition, the designated
interdisciplinary team member would be responsible for: (1)
Collaborating with hospice representatives and coordinating LTC
facility staff participation in the hospice care planning process for
those residents receiving these services; (2) communicating with
hospice representatives and other healthcare providers participating in
the provision of care for the terminal illness and related conditions,
as well as other conditions, to ensure quality of care for the patient
and family; (3) ensuring that the LTC facility communicates with the
hospice medical director, the patient's attending physician, and other
physicians participating in the provision of care as needed to
coordinate the hospice care of the hospice patient with the medical
care provided by other physicians; (4) obtaining information from the
hospice, including the most recent hospice plan of care specific to
each patient, the hospice election form, any advance directives
specific to each patient, and physician certification and
recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient, as
well as names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in
hospice care of each patient; instructions on how to access the
hospice's 24-hour on-call system; hospice medication information
specific to each patient; and
[[Page 65286]]
hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to
each patient. In addition, we propose requiring that the LTC facility
staff provide orientation to relevant hospice staff about the
facility's policies and procedures, including patient rights,
appropriate forms, and recordkeeping requirements.
These proposed requirements would apply regardless of the financial
and/or ownership relationship between the LTC facility and the hospice.
Although we believe such orientation is critical for the protection
of residents receiving hospice care, we understand that it may be
difficult for an LTC facility to properly orient other hospice staff
who, in unexpected circumstances, may occasionally provide coverage for
a member of the identified hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG).
Therefore, we welcome public comment on how LTC facilities can provide
orientation for hospice staff that is quick and efficient but
sufficient to protect residents who receive hospice care.
Our intention is to ensure continuity of care by involving
designated representatives from both the LTC facility and the hospice
in the hospice care planning and hospice care implementation processes,
as well as in LTC facility processes. The LTC facility would have the
flexibility to assign one employee from the facility's
interdisciplinary team as a coordinator for all hospice residents, or
assign a separate coordinator for each hospice resident. The designated
coordinator would ensure that the hospice plan of care and the LTC
facility plan of care were implemented and updated as appropriate.
``Interdisciplinary team'' refers to the professionals who work
together to provide services to the resident, as defined at Sec.
483.20(k)(2)(ii). Interdisciplinary team members may include
physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, dietitians, and other
professionals, such as developmental disabilities specialists.
Involvement of other disciplines is dependent upon resident needs.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(4) that each LTC facility that
arranges for hospice care under a written agreement with a Medicare-
certified hospice ensure that each resident's written plan of care
includes both the hospice plan of care and a description of the
services furnished by the LTC facility to attain or maintain the
resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-
being, as required at Sec. 483.20(k). We expect that the LTC
facility's designated coordinator would work with hospice
representatives to meet this requirement.
We believe that including the hospice plan of care (which addresses
care for the terminal condition and related conditions) with the LTC
facility care plan would improve care coordination and result in better
implementation of the overall plan of care. We believe these proposed
requirements would facilitate effective communication and coordination
between the Medicare-certified hospice provider and the LTC facility,
ensuring that quality care would be provided to residents receiving
hospice services. We note that these proposed requirements would not
limit the scope of the relationship between the Medicare-certified
hospice and the facility. Each party could add provisions, subject to
mutual agreement, as long as they met or exceeded the proposed
requirements.
We anticipate that these proposed requirements, aimed at improving
the coordination of care between LTC facilities and Medicare-certified
hospice care providers, would lead to improved consistency and quality
of care for LTC facility residents who elect to receive hospice
services.
In addition, we are taking this opportunity to make a technical
correction due to an incorrect citation at Sec. 483.10(n). The
language states, ``An individual resident may self-administer drugs if
the interdisciplinary team, as defined by Sec. 483.20(d)(2)(ii), has
determined that this practice is safe.'' However, Sec.
483.20(d)(2)(ii) does not exist. The correct citation is Sec.
483.20(k)(2)(ii). In Sec. 483.10(n), we are proposing that the
reference ``Sec. 483.20(d)(2)(ii)'' be revised to read ``Sec.
483.20(k)(2)(ii).''
3. Relevance to Existing Hospice Requirements
Our intent in proposing these requirements for LTC facilities is to
ensure they are in accord with our existing requirements at Sec.
418.112 for hospices that provide services to residents of LTC
facilities. Our proposed requirements for LTC facilities to have
agreements with hospices and to collaborate and communicate with
hospices to provide care for LTC facility residents largely parallels
the language and intent of the hospice requirements. There are,
however, instances where employing the same language would not reflect
the distinct roles of each entity or where we believe it is important
to provide clarity and detail without disturbing the substance or the
proper interpretation of the requirements. In some instances, we are
proposing different requirements because we believe they are in the
best interests of the residents of LTC facilities. For instance, at
proposed Sec. 483.75 (r)(2)(ii)(J), the LTC facility would be required
to report all alleged violations by hospice personnel to the hospice
administrator immediately when the LTC facility becomes aware of the
alleged violation. However, the hospice is required at Sec.
418.112(c)(8) to report these same violations within 24 hours of the
hospice becoming aware of the alleged violation.
The rationale for both these rules is to require a written
agreement between the hospice and the LTC facility. (See Sec.
418.112(c)(1) through (9) and proposed Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(A)
through (K).) While the rules have slight differences in language,
substantively, the requirements are the same. We believe it is
appropriate for the remainder of the rule, including the coordination
of care requirements at proposed Sec. 483.75(r)(3)(i)(v) and Sec.
418.112(e), to reflect the difference in the roles between the LTC
facility and the hospice in providing resident care. Therefore, we are
proposing requirements for communication and collaboration specific to
the LTC facility that do not mirror the language in the hospice
requirements. Rather, the proposed rule for LTC facilities would
complement the hospice requirements, and our objective is that,
together, these rules will allow for better coordination of care and
quality of care for LTC facility residents.
Notwithstanding our analysis that these rules are complimentary and
substantively similar, and in view of the slight differences between
these rules, we are requesting public comment on whether the
differences found in the proposed rule would create a barrier to
forming agreements between LTC facilities or interfere in coordination
of residents' care between LTC facilities and hospices.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulations
As stated above, we are proposing a new standard at 42 CFR
483.75(r), entitled ``Hospice services.'' At Sec. 483.75(r)(1), we
propose that LTC facilities may either arrange for the provision of
hospice services through an agreement with one or more Medicare-
certified hospice providers or not arrange for such services and assist
a resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the
provision of these services when the resident requests such a transfer.
At Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(i) and (ii), we propose specific requirements
for LTC facilities choosing to have hospice care provided by a
Medicare-certified hospice in their facility. The LTC
[[Page 65287]]
facility would be required to ensure that the hospice services met
professional standards and principles that would apply to individuals
providing services in the facility, and the timeliness of the services.
We also propose requiring that, before any hospice care was provided to
a facility resident, a written agreement would have to be signed by
both an individual authorized by the hospice administration and an
individual authorized by the LTC facility administration.
In addition, under this section, we are proposing that the written
agreement would have to include, at the very least, the following
provisions:
Under Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(A), the services the hospice
will provide;
Under Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(B), the hospice's
responsibilities for determining the appropriate hospice plan of care
as specified in Sec. 418.112(d) of this chapter;
Under Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(C), the services the LTC
facility will continue to provide, based on each resident's care plan;
and
Under Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(D), a communication process,
including how the communication will be documented between the LTC
facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the
resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day.
Additionally, under Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii), we are proposing the
inclusion of other duties and responsibilities that must be delineated
by the LTC facility and the hospice in their written agreement. Under
Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E), we are proposing that the agreement contain
a provision that the LTC facility must notify the hospice provider
immediately regarding--
A significant change in the resident's physical, mental,
social, or emotional status;
Any clinical complication(s) that would suggest a need to
alter the plan of care;
A condition unrelated to the terminal condition that might
require transfer of the resident from the facility; or
The resident's death.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(F) that the hospice must
assume responsibility for determining the appropriate course of hospice
care, including the determination to change the level of services
provided.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(G) that the LTC facility must
continue to provide 24-hour room and board care, meet the resident's
personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice
representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is
appropriate based on the individual resident's needs.
At Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(H), we are proposing that the written
agreement include a delineation of additional hospice responsibilities,
which include, but are not limited to:
Providing medical direction and management of the patient.
Nursing.
Counseling (including spiritual, dietary, and
bereavement).
Social work; providing medical supplies, durable medical
equipment, and drugs necessary for the palliation of pain and symptoms
associated with the terminal illness and related conditions.
All other hospice services that are necessary for the care
of the resident's terminal illness and related conditions.
We propose at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(I) that the agreement include
a provision that the hospice may use LTC facility personnel, where
permitted by State law and as specified by the LTC facility, to assist
in the administration of prescribed therapies included in the hospice
plan of care.
We are also specifically proposing, at Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J),
that the written agreement contain a provision that the LTC facility
must report all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or
verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of
unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by hospice
personnel, to the hospice administrator immediately when the LTC
facility becomes aware of the alleged violation. We propose at Sec.
483.75(r)(2)(ii)(K) that the agreement must also include a delineation
of the responsibilities of the hospice to offer bereavement services to
LTC facility staff.
At Sec. 483.75(r)(3)(i) through (v), we are proposing that the LTC
facility that arranges for the provision of hospice care under a
written agreement must designate a member of the facility's
interdisciplinary team to be responsible for working with hospice
representatives to coordinate care provided by the LTC facility and
hospice staff to the resident. This individual must be responsible for:
(1) Collaborating with hospice representatives and coordinating LTC
facility staff participation in the hospice care planning process for
those residents receiving these services;
(2) Communicating with hospice representatives and other healthcare
providers participating in the provision of care for the terminal
illness, related conditions, and other conditions to ensure quality of
care for the patient and family;
(3) Ensuring that the LTC facility communicates with the hospice
medical director, the patient's attending physician, and other
physicians participating in the provision of care to the patient as
needed to coordinate the hospice care of the hospice patient with the
medical care provided by other physicians;
(4) Obtaining pertinent information from the hospice (that is, the
most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient; hospice
election form and any advance directives specific to each patient;
physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness
specific to each patient; names and contact information for hospice
personnel involved in hospice care of each patient; instructions on how
to access the hospice's 24-hour on-call system; hospice medication
information specific to each patient; and hospice physician and
attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient); and
(5) Ensuring that the LTC facility staff provide orientation in the
policies and procedures of the facility, including patient rights,
appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements, to hospice staff
furnishing care to LTC residents.
At Sec. 483.75(r)(4), we are proposing that each LTC facility
providing hospice care under a written agreement must ensure that each
resident's written plan of care includes both the hospice plan of care
and a description of the services furnished by the LTC facility to
attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental,
and psychosocial well-being, as required at Sec. 483.20(k).
As stated in the previous section above, we are also taking this
opportunity to make a technical correction due to an incorrect citation
at Sec. 483.10(n). In Sec. 483.10(n), we are proposing that the
reference ``Sec. 483.20(d)(2)(ii)'' be revised to read ``Sec.
483.20(k)(2)(ii).''
III. Collection of Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In
order to fairly evaluate whether an information collection should be
approved by OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 requires that we solicit comment on the following issues:
The need for the information collection and its usefulness
in carrying out the proper functions of our agency.
[[Page 65288]]
The accuracy of our estimate of the information collection
burden.
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected.
Recommendations to minimize the information collection
burden on the affected public, including automated collection
techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on each of these issues for the
following sections of this document that contain information collection
requirements (ICRs):
Proposed Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii) states that if hospice care is
provided in an LTC facility through an agreement with a Medicare-
certified hospice, the LTC facility must have a written agreement with
the Medicare-certified hospice before care is furnished to any
resident.
An LTC facility would be required to have only one written
agreement with each hospice that provides services in the facility.
This proposed rule would not require an LTC facility to have an
individual agreement with a hospice for each resident receiving hospice
services. Therefore, the burden associated with this requirement is the
time and effort necessary for an LTC facility to develop and finalize
one written agreement. Initially, the development of an agreement would
require staff time; however, it would also require additional staff
time to coordinate the care between the hospice and the LTC facility.
We estimate the number of hours to develop and finalize a written
agreement to be approximately 5 hours the first year. The estimated
burden associated with the first year is 80,695 hours or $5,512,275.
The current requirements at Sec. 483.75(h) ``Use of Outside
Resources,'' requires a written agreement when contracting for outside
services. Therefore, we would expect that a facility would modify an
existing agreement to make it specific to hospice services. Review and
revision of an already existing agreement would be expected to take
less time thereafter. We estimate that it would take 2 hours to review
and revise the agreement annually. The estimated annual burden
associated with each successive year after the first is 32,278 hours or
$2,204,910. We have based our projections of the hourly cost on the
rate for a staff lawyer at $68.31 an hour, which includes fringe
benefits (estimated to be 25 percent of the salary). (Source: Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics Survey.)
Proposed sections 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E)(1) through (4) state that the
LTC must notify the hospice immediately about--
A significant change in the resident's physical, mental,
social, or emotional status;
Clinical complications that suggest a need to alter the
plan of care;
A need to transfer the resident from the facility for any
condition that is not related to the terminal condition; or
The resident's death.
The burden associated with these requirements is the time and
effort it would take the LTC facility to provide notification to the
hospice. We estimate it would take approximately 5 minutes per
notification. We anticipate that this would affect 16,139 LTC
facilities. If each LTC facility makes 1 notification each month, the
burden associated with this requirement is 16,139 annual burden hours
and the cost would be $504,344 annually, based on an hourly rate of
$31.25 for a blended salary of a registered nurse and licensed
practical nurse that includes fringe benefits, since either
practitioner could notify the hospice of stated changes. (Source:
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics Survey).
Proposed Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J) states that under the agreement,
the LTC facility must report all alleged violations involving
mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse,
including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient
property by hospice personnel to the hospice administrator immediately
when the LTC facility becomes aware of the alleged violation. The
burden associated with this requirement is the time and effort it would
take the LTC facility to report this information to the hospice
administrator. We estimate it would take approximately 10 minutes per
incident. We anticipate that this would affect 16,139 LTC facilities.
If each LTC facility made one report per month, the burden associated
with this requirement would be 32,278 annual burden hours and the cost
would be $1,032,895 annually based on an hourly rate of $32 for a
registered nurse that includes fringe benefits. (Source: Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics Survey)
Estimated Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hourly
Burden per Total labor cost Total labor Total
Regulation section(s) OMB control Respondents Responses response annual of cost of capital/ Total cost
No. (hours) burden reporting reporting maintenance ($)
(hours) ($) ($) costs ($)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)........... 0938--New 16,139 16,139 5 80,695* 68.31 5,512,275 0 5,512,275
........... 16,139 16,139 2 **32,278 68.31 2,204,910 0 2,204,910
Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(E)(1-4)... 0938--New 16,139 193,668 .08333 16,139 31.25 504,344 0 504,344
Sec. 483.75(r)(2)(ii)(J)........ 0938--New 16,139 193,668 .16666 32,278 32.00 1,032,895 0 1,032,895
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... ........... 16,139 209,807 ........... 161,390 ........... ........... ........... 9,254,424
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* One time burden estimate for initial development of written agreement.
** Annual burden estimate associated with updating existing written agreements.
If you comment on these information collection and recordkeeping
requirements, please do either of the following:
1. Submit your comments electronically as specified in the
ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule; or
2. Mail copies to the address specified in the ADDRESSES section of
this proposed rule and to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: CMS Desk Officer,
CMS-3140-P.
Fax: (202) 395-6974; or
E-mail: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.govIV.
Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
[[Page 65289]]
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism, and the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This rule
does not qualify as a major rule, as the estimated economic impact is
$7,049,515 the first year and $3,742,150 thereafter.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses, if a rule has a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For purposes of the RFA, small
entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small
government jurisdictions. The great majority of hospitals and most
other health care providers and suppliers are small entities, either by
being nonprofit organizations or by meeting the SBA definition of a
small business (having revenues of less than $7.0 million to $34.5
million in any 1 year). For purposes of the RFA, the majority of
hospitals, LTC facilities and hospices are considered to be small
entities. Individuals and States are not included in the definition of
a small entity. A rule has a significant economic impact on the small
entities it affects, if it significantly affects their total costs or
revenues. Under statute, we are required to assess the compliance
burden the regulation will impose on small entities. Generally, we
analyze the burden in terms of the impact it will have on entities'
costs if these are identifiable or revenues. As a matter of sound
analytic methodology, to the extent that data are available, we attempt
to stratify entities by major operating characteristics such as size
and geographic location. If the average annual impact on small entities
is 3 to 5 percent or more, it is to be considered significant. We
estimate that these requirements would cost $437 ($7,049,515/16,139
facilities) per facility initially and $232 ($3,742,150/16,139
facilities) thereafter. This clearly is much below 1 percent;
therefore, we do not anticipate it to have a significant impact. We do
not have any data related to the number of LTC facilities contracting
hospice care through an outside hospice provider; however, we are aware
through annual surveys that not all LTC facilities arrange for the
provision of hospice care.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 603 of the RFA. For
the purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a metropolitan
statistical area and has fewer than 100 beds. This rule would impact
only long-term care facilities. Therefore, the Secretary has determined
that this proposed rule would not have any impact on the operations of
small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2010, that
threshold is approximately $135 million. This rule would not have a
significant impact on the governments mentioned or on private sector
costs. The estimated economic effect of this rule is $7,049,515 the
first year and $3,742,150 thereafter. These estimates are derived from
our analysis of burden associated with these requirements in section
III, ``Collection of Information Requirements.''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This rule will not have any effect on State or local
governments.
B. Anticipated Effects
1. Effects on LTC Facilities
The purpose of this rule is to ensure the coordination of care for
LTC facility residents who elect hospice services. The coordination of
care is anticipated to result in better outcomes related to quality of
care and quality of life for residents. With appropriate coordination
of care as proposed in this rule, we anticipate improved outcomes
through more efficient coordination of care between the LTC facility
staff and hospice staff, a decrease in duplication of services
provided, and improved resident care.
2. Effects on Other Providers
We expect improved consistency in the provision of services to
residents receiving hospice care in an LTC facility. We anticipate that
primarily only LTC facilities and Medicare-certified hospice providers
would be affected, as this proposed rule would be expected to improve
coordination of care between LTC facilities and Medicare-certified
hospice providers. In instances where a patient is transferred to the
hospital for care unrelated to their terminal illness, the hospital
should be notified that the patient has elected hospice care.
3. Effects on the Medicare and Medicaid Programs
An Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report released in 1997
found that ``contractual arrangements between hospice providers and
nursing homes present vulnerabilities for inappropriate use of
excessive Medicare and Medicaid payments being made to hospice
providers or to nursing homes'' (U.S. HHS OIG, Hospice and Nursing Home
Contractual Relationships, 1997 Nov., OEI-05-95-00251). We anticipate
that the proposed rule would decrease these vulnerabilities, as the
services provided by both the LTC facility and the Medicare-certified
hospice would be clearly defined.
C. Alternatives Considered
We considered the effects of not addressing specific requirements
for the provision of hospice care in LTC facilities. However, we
believe that to improve quality and ensure consistency in the provision
of hospice services in LTC facilities, it is important to delineate
clear responsibilities for Medicare-certified hospice providers and LTC
facilities. We expect that these requirements would result in
improvement in the quality of care provided to LTC residents receiving
hospice services.
D. Conclusion
This proposed rule for a written agreement when arranging for the
provision of hospice services in LTC facilities is intended to improve
the continuity and quality of care provided to terminally ill LTC
facility residents. It is consistent with the Administration's efforts
toward broad-
[[Page 65290]]
based improvements in the quality of health care furnished by Medicare
and Medicaid providers.
This proposed rule identifies an LTC facility's choices if a
resident elects to receive hospice care. This proposed rule also
clarifies the responsibility of the facility that chooses not to
arrange for the provision of hospice services at the facility through
an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice. These facilities must
assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for
the provision of hospice services when a resident requests a transfer.
This proposed rule would ensure that the duties and
responsibilities of a hospice are clearly articulated if the hospice
provides care in an LTC facility. Therefore, in order to ensure that
quality hospice care is provided to LTC residents we believe it is
essential to add these proposed requirements to the LTC regulations.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
regulation was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 483
Grant programs--health, Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Medicaid, Medicare, Nursing homes, Nutrition, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services proposes to amend 42 CFR Chapter IV as set forth
below:
PART 483--REQUIREMENTS FOR STATES AND LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 483 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
Subpart B--Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities
Sec. 483.10 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 483.10(n), the reference ``Sec. 483.20(d)(2)(ii)'' is
revised to read ``Sec. 483.20(k)(2)(ii).''
3. Section 483.75 is amended by adding paragraph (r) to read as
follows--
Sec. 483.75 Administration.
* * * * *
(r) Hospice services. (1) A long-term care (LTC) facility may
either--
(i) Arrange for the provision of hospice services through an
agreement with one or more Medicare-certified hospices; or
(ii) Not arrange for the provision of hospice services at the
facility through an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice and
assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for
the provision of hospice services when a resident requests a transfer.
(2) If hospice care is provided in an LTC facility through an
agreement as specified in paragraph (r)(1)(i) of this section with a
hospice, the LTC facility must:
(i) Ensure that the hospice services meet professional standards
and principles that apply to individuals providing services in the
facility, and to the timeliness of the services.
(ii) Have a written agreement with the hospice that is signed by an
authorized representative of the hospice and an authorized
representative of the LTC facility before hospice care is furnished to
any resident. The written agreement must set out at least the
following:
(A) The services the hospice will provide.
(B) The hospice's responsibilities for determining the appropriate
hospice plan of care as specified in Sec. 418.112(d) of this chapter.
(C) The services the LTC facility will continue to provide, based
on each resident's care plan.
(D) A communication process, including how the communication will
be documented between the LTC facility and the hospice provider, to
ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours
per day.
(E) A provision that the LTC facility immediately notifies the
hospice regarding--
(1) A significant change in the resident's physical, mental,
social, or emotional status;
(2) Clinical complications that suggest a need to alter the plan of
care;
(3) A need to transfer the resident from the facility for any
condition that is not related to the terminal condition; or
(4) The resident's death.
(F) A provision stating that the hospice assumes responsibility for
determining the appropriate course of hospice care, including the
determination to change the level of services provided.
(G) An agreement that it is the LTC facility's responsibility to
furnish 24-hour room and board care, meet the resident's personal care
and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and
ensure that the level of care provided is appropriate based on the
individual resident's needs.
(H) A delineation of the hospice's responsibilities, which include,
but are not limited to, providing medical direction and management of
the patient; nursing; counseling (including spiritual, dietary, and
bereavement); social work; providing medical supplies, durable medical
equipment, and drugs necessary for the palliation of pain and symptoms
associated with the terminal illness and related conditions; and all
other hospice services that are necessary for the care of the
resident's terminal illness and related conditions.
(I) A provision that when the LTC facility personnel are
responsible for the administration of prescribed therapies, including
those therapies determined by the hospice and delineated in the hospice
plan of care, the LTC facility personnel may administer the therapies
where permitted by State law and as specified by the LTC facility.
(J) A provision stating that the LTC facility must report all
alleged violatio