Notice of Availability of Draft Policy for the Assessment of Civil Administrative Penalties and Permit Sanctions for Public Review and Comment, 64987-64988 [2010-26417]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices
import specimens of northern fur seals
(Callorhinus ursinus) for scientific
research.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or e-mail
comments must be received on or before
November 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review by
selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public
Comment’’ from the Features box on the
Applications and Permits for Protected
Species (APPS) home page, https://
apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then selecting
File No. 14525 from the list of available
applications.
These documents are also available
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 713–2289; fax (301) 713–0376; and
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213; phone (562) 980–4001;
fax (562) 980–4018.
Written comments on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, at the address listed above.
Comments may also be submitted by
facsimile to (301) 713–0376, or by email to NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov.
Please include File No. 14525 in the
subject line of the e-mail comment.
Those individuals requesting a public
hearing should submit a written request
to the Chief, Permits, Conservation and
Education Division at the address listed
above. The request should set forth the
specific reasons why a hearing on this
application would be appropriate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sloan or Jennifer Skidmore, (301)
713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject permit is requested under the
authority of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the
regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216).
The applicant proposes to import
biological samples from 10 subadult
male fur seals over a five-year period for
studies on mechanisms of sleep in fur
seals. Fur seals will be captured in
Russia, held in captivity, sampled while
in captivity, and euthanized at the
termination of study to obtain their
brains. Whole brains and brain tissues
will be imported to the U.S. for
anatomical and immunohistochemical
studies. The first aim of the project is to
correlate the release of major
neurotransmitters in the brain of the fur
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
seal during sleep and waking using
microdialysis, high-performance liquid
chromatography and radioimmunoassay
analysis. The second aim of the study is
to localize the distribution of the above
mentioned cell groups in the fur seal
brain as well as to localize the positions
of the sites where the microdialysis
samples were collected. Samples would
be imported from Russia to UCLA for
analysis and samples would be exported
from the U.S. to South Africa for
additional analysis.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an initial
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of the
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: October 15, 2010.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–26648 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 101014509–0508–01]
RIN 0648–XZ62
Notice of Availability of Draft Policy for
the Assessment of Civil Administrative
Penalties and Permit Sanctions for
Public Review and Comment
Office of General Counsel
(OGC), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
announces the availability of a draft
Policy for the Assessment of Civil
Administrative Penalties and Permit
Sanctions (Penalty Policy) for public
review and comment.
DATES: The draft Penalty Policy will
remain available for public review until
December 20, 2010. To ensure that
comments will be considered, NOAA
must receive written comments by
December 20, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64987
Interested persons may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://
www.regulations.gov or
penaltypolicy@noaa.gov;
• Fax: 301 427–2210; Attn: Frank
Sprtel;
• Mail: Office of General Counsel for
Enforcement and Litigation, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, 8484 Georgia Avenue,
Suite 400, Silver Spring, MD 20910,
Attn: Frank Sprtel.
The draft Penalty Policy is available
electronically at the following Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ole/
penaltypolicy.html. Commenters may
also request a hard copy of the draft
Penalty Policy by sending a selfaddressed envelope (size 8.5 x 11
inches) to the street address provided
above. Comments submitted in response
to this notice are a matter of public
record. Before including an address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in a
comment, please be aware that
comments—including any personal
identifying information—can and will
be made publicly available. While a
request can be made to withhold
personal identifying information from
public review, NOAA cannot ensure
that it will be able to do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Sprtel at the above address or by
telephone at 301 495–7147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The draft
Penalty Policy is intended to provide
guidance for the Assessment of civil
administrative penalties and permit
sanctions under the statutes and
regulations enforced by NOAA. As
explained more fully in the text of the
draft Penalty Policy, the purpose of the
Policy is to ensure that: (1) Civil
administrative penalties and permit
sanctions are assessed in accordance
with the laws that NOAA enforces in a
fair and consistent manner; (2) penalties
and permit sanctions are appropriate for
the gravity of the violation; (3) penalties
and permit sanctions are sufficient to
deter both particular violators and the
regulated community from committing
violations; (4) economic incentives for
noncompliance are eliminated; and (5)
compliance is expeditiously achieved
and maintained to protect natural
resources. Under this Policy, NOAA
expects to improve consistency at a
national level, provide greater
predictability for the regulated
community and the public, improve
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
64988
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices
transparency in enforcement, and more
effectively protect natural resources.
Under the proposed penalty policy,
penalties and permit sanctions are based
on three criteria: (1) A base penalty
amount and permit sanction reflective
of the seriousness of the violation; (2) an
adjustment of the base penalty and
permit sanction upward or downward to
reflect particular circumstances of a
specific violation; and (3) an additional
amount added to the adjusted base
penalty to recoup the economic benefit
of noncompliance. We note that the new
penalty policy is a departure from
NOAA’s prior practice of developing
detailed penalty schedules by region
and by specific types of violations with
broad ranges for both penalty and
permit sanctions. The new policy uses
a simplified approach of one penalty
and permit sanction matrix for each
major statute NOAA enforces, to be
applied nationally, with narrower
penalty and permit sanction ranges.
This approach assures that NOAA
attorneys are provided with greater
guidance in recommending penalties,
and should assure fairness and
consistency of approach across NOAA
statutes, across fisheries, and across the
country.
When finalized, this draft Penalty
Policy will supersede previous guidance
regarding assessment of penalties or
permit sanctions and previous penalty
and permit sanction schedules issued by
the NOAA Office of the General
Counsel. This Penalty Policy provides
guidance for the NOAA Office of the
General Counsel, but does not, nor is it
intended to, create a right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at
law or in equity, in any person or
company.
The full penalty policy, along with
examples, matrixes, and schedules, can
be found at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
ole/penaltypolicy.html. NOAA is
seeking public comment on all portions
of the penalty policy, but specifically
asks for comment in the following areas:
(1) The handling of recreational, versus
commercial, activity in assessing
penalties—specifically, whether to
create separate matrixes and/or
schedules for recreational activity in the
penalty policy, or to leave such
distinctions as an ‘‘adjustment’’ factor, as
currently written; (2) the evaluation of
prior violations in assessing penalties—
specifically, whether to create upward
penalty assessments based on prior
charged conduct, or only to consider
prior conduct that is fully adjudicated;
(3) whether the proposed use of permit
sanctions in the penalty policy is
appropriate; (4) whether any additional
upward or downward ‘‘adjustment’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
factors should be considered in
assessing penalties under the penalty
policy; (5) whether the matrixes and
schedules in the penalty policy
(Appendices 2 and 3), adequately reflect
an appropriate range of penalties for
particular violations; and (6) whether
there should be any change in the
proposed method of calculating
economic benefit in the penalty policy.
Dated: October 15, 2010.
Lois J. Schiffer,
General Counsel, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–26417 Filed 10–15–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain lined
paper products (CLPP) from India. For
the period September 1, 2008, through
August 31, 2009, we have preliminarily
determined that Navneet Publications
(India) Limited (Navneet) did not make
sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value (NV) (i.e., sales were made
at de minimis dumping margins). If
these preliminary results are adopted in
the final results of this administrative
review, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties. For the same
period, we have preliminarily
determined that U.S. sales have been
made below NV by Super Impex. If
these preliminary results are adopted in
our final results, we will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties based on the
difference between the export price (EP)
and NV. See ‘‘Preliminary Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Moore (Navneet) or Cindy
Robinson (Super Impex) AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482–
3797, respectively.
Background
On September 1, 2009, the
Department issued a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of this order for the period of
review (POR) of September 1, 2008,
through August 31, 2009. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 74 FR 45179
(September 1, 2009).
Pursuant to a request from the
Association of American School Paper
Suppliers, (petitioner),1 the Department
published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of this antidumping
duty administrative review with respect
to 32 companies, including Navneet and
Super Impex for the period September
1, 2008, through August 31, 2009. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 54956 (October 26, 2009).
(Initiation Notice). On October 26, 2009,
the petitioner timely withdrew its
request for a review of Blue Bird (India)
Limited (Blue Bird).
On November 3, 2009, the Department
notified interested parties of its intent to
use CBP data for respondent selection.
See Memorandum to The File, Through
Melissa Skinner, Office Director, Office
3 and Through James Terpstra, Program
Manager, Office 3 from Stephanie
Moore, Case Analyst titled ‘‘Customs
and Border Patrol Data for Selection of
Respondents for Individual Review.’’
On November 10 and December 3,
2009, the Department received
comments regarding respondent
selection from the petitioner. On
January 29, 2010, the Department
selected Navneet and Super Impex as
companies to be individually examined
1 On September 30, 2009, the Department
received a timely request to conduct an
administrative review of the following 32
companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.;
American Scholar, Inc., and/or I–Scholar;
Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co., Ltd.; Bafna Exports;
Blue Bird India Ltd.; Cello International Pvt. Ltd
(M/S Cello Paper Products); Creative Divya;
Corporate Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; D.D International;
Exmart International Pvt. Ltd.; Fatechand
Mahendrakumar; FFI International; Freight India
Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International Greetings Pvt. Ltd.;
Lodha Offset Limited; Magic International Pvt. Ltd.;
Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.; Marisa International;
Navneet Publications (India) Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.;
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Premier Exports;
Riddhi Enterprises; SAB International; SAR
Transport Systems; Seet Kamal International;
Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Eternity Int’l Freight,
forwarder on behalf of Solitaire Logistics Pvt. Ltd.);
Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd.; Super Impex; Swati Growth
Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash Laminates.
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64987-64988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 101014509-0508-01]
RIN 0648-XZ62
Notice of Availability of Draft Policy for the Assessment of
Civil Administrative Penalties and Permit Sanctions for Public Review
and Comment
AGENCY: Office of General Counsel (OGC), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
announces the availability of a draft Policy for the Assessment of
Civil Administrative Penalties and Permit Sanctions (Penalty Policy)
for public review and comment.
DATES: The draft Penalty Policy will remain available for public review
until December 20, 2010. To ensure that comments will be considered,
NOAA must receive written comments by December 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may submit comments by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic public comments
via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://www.regulations.gov or
penaltypolicy@noaa.gov;
Fax: 301 427-2210; Attn: Frank Sprtel;
Mail: Office of General Counsel for Enforcement and
Litigation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 8484
Georgia Avenue, Suite 400, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Attn: Frank Sprtel.
The draft Penalty Policy is available electronically at the
following Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ole/penaltypolicy.html.
Commenters may also request a hard copy of the draft Penalty Policy by
sending a self-addressed envelope (size 8.5 x 11 inches) to the street
address provided above. Comments submitted in response to this notice
are a matter of public record. Before including an address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in a
comment, please be aware that comments--including any personal
identifying information--can and will be made publicly available. While
a request can be made to withhold personal identifying information from
public review, NOAA cannot ensure that it will be able to do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Sprtel at the above address or
by telephone at 301 495-7147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The draft Penalty Policy is intended to
provide guidance for the Assessment of civil administrative penalties
and permit sanctions under the statutes and regulations enforced by
NOAA. As explained more fully in the text of the draft Penalty Policy,
the purpose of the Policy is to ensure that: (1) Civil administrative
penalties and permit sanctions are assessed in accordance with the laws
that NOAA enforces in a fair and consistent manner; (2) penalties and
permit sanctions are appropriate for the gravity of the violation; (3)
penalties and permit sanctions are sufficient to deter both particular
violators and the regulated community from committing violations; (4)
economic incentives for noncompliance are eliminated; and (5)
compliance is expeditiously achieved and maintained to protect natural
resources. Under this Policy, NOAA expects to improve consistency at a
national level, provide greater predictability for the regulated
community and the public, improve
[[Page 64988]]
transparency in enforcement, and more effectively protect natural
resources.
Under the proposed penalty policy, penalties and permit sanctions
are based on three criteria: (1) A base penalty amount and permit
sanction reflective of the seriousness of the violation; (2) an
adjustment of the base penalty and permit sanction upward or downward
to reflect particular circumstances of a specific violation; and (3) an
additional amount added to the adjusted base penalty to recoup the
economic benefit of noncompliance. We note that the new penalty policy
is a departure from NOAA's prior practice of developing detailed
penalty schedules by region and by specific types of violations with
broad ranges for both penalty and permit sanctions. The new policy uses
a simplified approach of one penalty and permit sanction matrix for
each major statute NOAA enforces, to be applied nationally, with
narrower penalty and permit sanction ranges. This approach assures that
NOAA attorneys are provided with greater guidance in recommending
penalties, and should assure fairness and consistency of approach
across NOAA statutes, across fisheries, and across the country.
When finalized, this draft Penalty Policy will supersede previous
guidance regarding assessment of penalties or permit sanctions and
previous penalty and permit sanction schedules issued by the NOAA
Office of the General Counsel. This Penalty Policy provides guidance
for the NOAA Office of the General Counsel, but does not, nor is it
intended to, create a right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity, in any person or company.
The full penalty policy, along with examples, matrixes, and
schedules, can be found at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ole/penaltypolicy.html. NOAA is seeking public comment on all portions of
the penalty policy, but specifically asks for comment in the following
areas: (1) The handling of recreational, versus commercial, activity in
assessing penalties--specifically, whether to create separate matrixes
and/or schedules for recreational activity in the penalty policy, or to
leave such distinctions as an ``adjustment'' factor, as currently
written; (2) the evaluation of prior violations in assessing
penalties--specifically, whether to create upward penalty assessments
based on prior charged conduct, or only to consider prior conduct that
is fully adjudicated; (3) whether the proposed use of permit sanctions
in the penalty policy is appropriate; (4) whether any additional upward
or downward ``adjustment'' factors should be considered in assessing
penalties under the penalty policy; (5) whether the matrixes and
schedules in the penalty policy (Appendices 2 and 3), adequately
reflect an appropriate range of penalties for particular violations;
and (6) whether there should be any change in the proposed method of
calculating economic benefit in the penalty policy.
Dated: October 15, 2010.
Lois J. Schiffer,
General Counsel, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-26417 Filed 10-15-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P