Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, 64953-64955 [2010-24918]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
NOX Emissions Reduction Program, as a
revision to the Illinois SIP.
[FR Doc. 2010–26438 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2010–0415; FRL–9210–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a revision to
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Missouri. The
purpose of this revision is to update the
Springfield City Code and is part of
ongoing SIP maintenance to assure that
outdated local codes and ordinances do
not remain in the SIP. The revision
reflects updates to the Missouri
statewide rules, and will ensure
consistency between the applicable
local agency rules and the Federally
approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective December 20, 2010, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by November 22,
2010. If EPA receives adverse comment,
we will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2010–0415, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Lachala
Kemp, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas
City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2010–
0415. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lachala Kemp at 913–551–7214, or by
e-mail at kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or
‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing
the following questions:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What revisions is EPA approving?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
On January 21, 2009, EPA received a
request from the Missouri Department of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64953
Natural Resources to approve revisions
to the SIP relating to changes in the SIPapproved program for Springfield,
Missouri. In order for the local
program’s ‘‘Air Pollution’’ rules to be
incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, on behalf of the local
agency, the State must submit the
formally adopted regulations which are
consistent with State and Federal
requirements to EPA for inclusion in the
SIP. The regulation adoption process
generally includes public notice of a
public comment period and a public
hearing, and formal adoption of the rule
by the State authorized rulemaking
body. In this case that rulemaking body
is the local agency. After the local
agency formally adopts the rule, the
local agency submits the rulemaking to
the State, and then the State submits the
rulemaking to EPA for consideration for
formal action (inclusion of the
rulemaking into the SIP). EPA must
provide public notice and seek
additional public comment regarding
the proposed Federal action on the
State’s submission.
The 2009 revisions for Springfield
consist of administrative changes,
removing Springfield City Code Chapter
2A and replacing it with the Springfield
City Code Chapter 6. EPA had
previously approved portions of Chapter
2A, as it relates to regulation of
incinerators. In general, these changes
are administrative only and they do not
add any new limitations, conditions or
requirements. The revisions retain all
previous sections pertaining to
definitions, test methods and tables,
stack emission test methods, and
emission limitations for incinerators,
but with new numbering and titles. The
revision also removes compliance
schedules for incinerators which were
not in compliance upon the original
effective date of the rule (1969).
II. What revision is EPA approving?
EPA is approving revisions to the
relevant portions of Springfield City
Code Chapter 2A ‘‘Air Pollution Control
Standards’’, which are now found in
Chapter 6 of the Code. The local
agency’s ‘‘Air Pollution Control
Standards’’ were revised as follows:
Article I, section 2A has been
renumbered as Chapter 6 with other
corresponding renumbering within the
chapter.
All previous sections pertaining to
definitions, test methods and tables,
stack emission test methods, and
incinerators have all been retained, but
with new numbering and titles.
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
64954
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving these revisions to
the Springfield City Code Chapter 2A
Air Pollution Control Standard as
described above. We are processing this
action as a direct final action because
the revisions make routine changes to
the existing rules which are
noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not
anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on part of this rule and if that
part can be severed from the remainder
of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the
subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 20,
2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 22, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Accordingly, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Chapter 2A’’ under the heading
‘‘Springfield—Chapter 2A—Air
Pollution Control Standards’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Missouri
citation
Title
State
effective
date
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Chapter 2 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City
Metropolitan Area
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
64955
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Explanation
*
*
*
Springfield—Chapter 2A—Air Pollution Control Standards
Article I ...........................
Definitions .............................
12/04/08
Article II ..........................
Administrative and Enforcement.
Incinerators.
...............................................
12/04/08
10/21/10 [insert FR page
number where the document begins].
...............................................
12/04/08
...............................................
Article V ..........................
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[FR Doc. 2010–24918 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
50 CFR Part 648
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 0910051338–0151–02]
RIN 0648–XZ44
42 CFR Part 110
RIN 0906–AA83
Countermeasures Injury
Compensation Program (CICP):
Administrative Implementation; Interim
Final Rule
Correction
In rule document 2010–25110
beginning on page 63656 in the issue of
Friday, October 15, 2010, make the
following corrections:
1. On page 63656, in the first column,
in the DATES section, in the second and
third lines, ‘‘Written one comments’’
should read ‘‘Written comments’’.
2. On the same page, in the same
column, in the ADDRESSES section, in
the fourth and fifth lines, ‘‘submit your
comments in only of these ways’’ should
read ‘‘submit your comments in only
one of these ways’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2010–25110 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Correction to Cod Landing
Limit for Handgear A Vessels in the
Common Pool Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason
adjustment of landing limit.
AGENCY:
This action addresses an
oversight in a previous inseason action
and decreases the landing limit for cod
to 50 lb (22.7 kg) per trip for NE
multispecies limited access Handgear A
(HA) permitted vessels fishing in the
common pool fishery for the remainder
of the 2010 fishing year (FY) (through
April 30, 2011). This action is
authorized under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), and is
required by the regulations
implementing Amendment 13,
Amendment 16, and Framework
Adjustment 44 (FW 44) to the NE
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP).
DATES: Effective October 21, 2010,
through April 30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Potts, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9341, fax (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing possession and
landing limits for HA vessels fishing
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Only Section 6–2 is approved by EPA.
Only Sections 6–151, 155, 156, and
171 are approved by EPA.
Only Sections 6–311 through 314 are
approved by EPA.
under common pool regulations at
§ 648.82(b)(6) state that ‘‘The [300 lb
(136.1 kg)] cod trip limit shall be
adjusted proportionally to the trip limit
for [Gulf of Maine (GOM)] cod (rounded
up to the nearest 50 lb (22.7 kg)), as
specified in § 648.86(b)). An inseason
action published in the Federal Register
on September 27, 2010 (75 FR 59154),
reduced the GOM cod trip limit for NE
multispecies common pool vessels
fishing under a day-at-sea (DAS) to 100
lb (45.4 kg) per DAS up to 1,000 lb
(453.6 kg) per trip, from the original 800
lb (362.9 kg) per DAS up to 4,000 lb
(1,814.4 kg) per trip limit, a 87.5 percent
reduction. Therefore, the HA cod trip
limit should have been reduced 87.5
percent from 300 lb (136.1 kg) to 37.5
lb (17.0 kg), and rounded up to 50 lb
(22.7 kg)). The HA cod limit applies to
both the GOM and Georges Bank (GB)
stocks of cod. Additional details
regarding the need to reduce the
common pool GOM cod in order to
decrease the likelihood of harvest
exceeding the subcomponent of the
annual catch limit (ACL) allocated to
the common pool, and the authority of
the Administrator, Northeast (NE)
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator)
to take such action, are stated in the
action published on September 27, 2010
(75 FR 59154), and are not repeated
here.
This action therefore, reduces the
common pool cod trip limit for HA
vessels to 50 lb (22.7 kg) from 100 lb
(45.4 kg). Catch will be closely
monitored through dealer-reported
landings, vessel monitoring system
(VMS) catch reports, and other available
information. Further inseason
adjustments to decrease the trip limit, or
to increase differential DAS measures,
may be considered, based on updated
catch data and projections. Conversely,
if the common pool sub-ACL is
projected to be under-harvested by the
end of FY 2010, in-season adjustments,
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64953-64955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2010-0415; FRL-9210-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri. The purpose of this revision
is to update the Springfield City Code and is part of ongoing SIP
maintenance to assure that outdated local codes and ordinances do not
remain in the SIP. The revision reflects updates to the Missouri
statewide rules, and will ensure consistency between the applicable
local agency rules and the Federally approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 20, 2010,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November
22, 2010. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2010-0415, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2010-0415. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30
excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp at 913-551-7214, or by e-
mail at kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following questions:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What revisions is EPA approving?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
On January 21, 2009, EPA received a request from the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources to approve revisions to the SIP
relating to changes in the SIP-approved program for Springfield,
Missouri. In order for the local program's ``Air Pollution'' rules to
be incorporated into the Federally-enforceable SIP, on behalf of the
local agency, the State must submit the formally adopted regulations
which are consistent with State and Federal requirements to EPA for
inclusion in the SIP. The regulation adoption process generally
includes public notice of a public comment period and a public hearing,
and formal adoption of the rule by the State authorized rulemaking
body. In this case that rulemaking body is the local agency. After the
local agency formally adopts the rule, the local agency submits the
rulemaking to the State, and then the State submits the rulemaking to
EPA for consideration for formal action (inclusion of the rulemaking
into the SIP). EPA must provide public notice and seek additional
public comment regarding the proposed Federal action on the State's
submission.
The 2009 revisions for Springfield consist of administrative
changes, removing Springfield City Code Chapter 2A and replacing it
with the Springfield City Code Chapter 6. EPA had previously approved
portions of Chapter 2A, as it relates to regulation of incinerators. In
general, these changes are administrative only and they do not add any
new limitations, conditions or requirements. The revisions retain all
previous sections pertaining to definitions, test methods and tables,
stack emission test methods, and emission limitations for incinerators,
but with new numbering and titles. The revision also removes compliance
schedules for incinerators which were not in compliance upon the
original effective date of the rule (1969).
II. What revision is EPA approving?
EPA is approving revisions to the relevant portions of Springfield
City Code Chapter 2A ``Air Pollution Control Standards'', which are now
found in Chapter 6 of the Code. The local agency's ``Air Pollution
Control Standards'' were revised as follows:
Article I, section 2A has been renumbered as Chapter 6 with other
corresponding renumbering within the chapter.
All previous sections pertaining to definitions, test methods and
tables, stack emission test methods, and incinerators have all been
retained, but with new numbering and titles.
[[Page 64954]]
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving these revisions to the Springfield City Code
Chapter 2A Air Pollution Control Standard as described above. We are
processing this action as a direct final action because the revisions
make routine changes to the existing rules which are noncontroversial.
Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part
can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 20, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 22, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Accordingly, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Chapter 2A'' under the heading ``Springfield--Chapter
2A--Air Pollution Control Standards'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Chapter 2 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations
for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64955]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Springfield--Chapter 2A--Air Pollution Control Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article I........................ Definitions......... 12/04/08 10/21/10 [insert FR Only Section 6-2 is
page number where approved by EPA.
the document
begins].
Article II....................... Administrative and 12/04/08 .................... Only Sections 6-151,
Enforcement. 155, 156, and 171
are approved by
EPA.
Incinerators........
Article V........................ .................... 12/04/08 .................... Only Sections 6-311
through 314 are
approved by EPA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-24918 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
