Science Advisory Board Staff Office; Request for Nominations of Experts To Serve on the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Air Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee (AMMS), 64726-64727 [2010-26448]
Download as PDF
64726
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Notices
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Registration review, Pesticides and
pests, methamidophos.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–26453 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9215–6]
Science Advisory Board Staff Office;
Request for Nominations of Experts To
Serve on the Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) Air
Monitoring and Methods
Subcommittee (AMMS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The EPA Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office is requesting
public nominations of experts to serve
on the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC) Air Monitoring and
Methods Subcommittee (AMMS).
DATES: Nominations should be
submitted by November 10, 2010, per
instructions below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
member of the public wishing further
information regarding this Notice and
Request for Nominations may contact
Dr. Holly Stallworth, Designated Federal
Officer (DFO), SAB Staff Office, by
telephone/voice mail at (202) 564–2073;
by fax at (202) 565–2098 or via e-mail
at stallworth.holly@epa.gov. General
information concerning the CASAC can
be found on the EPA CASAC Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/casac.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) was
established under section 109(d)(2) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42
U.S.C. 7409) as an independent
scientific advisory committee. CASAC
provides advice, information and
recommendations on the scientific and
technical aspects of air quality criteria
and national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) under sections 108
and 109 of the Act.
Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires
that the Agency periodically review and
revise, as appropriate, the air quality
criteria and the National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for the six
‘‘criteria’’ air pollutants. EPA’s Office of
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Oct 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS) requests independent review
and advice from CASAC on the
following subjects:
• Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)-Sulfur
Oxides (SOX) Monitoring and Network
Design—A review of candidate methods
for assessing levels of N and S
deposition; specifically constituents
such as particulate sulfate, total
oxidized nitrogen (NOy), sulfur dioxide
(SO2), and ammonia gas and ammonia
ion combined (NHX) in the assessment
of an Atmospheric Acidification
Potential Index, and the potential
network design for a monitoring system
in support of a secondary NOX/SOX
NAAQS.
• Photochemical Assessment
Monitoring Stations (PAMS): Network
Re-engineering—Advice on potential
revisions to the technical and regulatory
aspects of the PAMS program; including
changes to required measurements and
associated network design requirements
and a review of appropriate technology,
sampling frequency, and overall
program objectives in the context of the
most recently revised ozone NAAQS
and changes to atmospheric chemistry
that have occurred over the past 10–15
years in the most significantly impacted
areas.
• Network Design Guidance
Development for Near-road Ambient Air
Monitoring Requirements: Multipollutant Focus—Review of the progress
of a pilot monitoring study including
site selection, planned measurements,
and timeline; review of EPA’s Near-road
Network Design Technical Assistance
Document (first Draft) including
assessment of procedures for identifying
maximum site location(s) including
dispersion modeling and evaluation of
potential biasing factors and
recommended measurements for nearroad compliance network; and a review
of the role of alternative technology
such as passive measurement in
compliance and research monitoring
studies.
• Methods for Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs)—Advice on
potential improvements to TO–15 with
particular emphasis on improving the
characterization of acrolein; review
method revisions for canister cleaning
procedures, preparation of calibration
standards, performance testing
protocols, and subsequent changes to air
quality system reporting procedures;
advice on improvements for TO–13A
methodology for compounds such as
naphthalene, other polyaromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and branched
PAHs; and advice on role of new
technology in characterizing volatile
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and semi-volatile compounds on a realtime or near real-time basis.
In response to OAQPS request, the
Science Advisory Board Staff Office is
requesting public nominations of
scientific and technical experts to form
a new subcommittee of the CASAC to
provide advice on the four advisory
topics as described above. This
subcommittee, the CASAC Air
Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee
(AAMS) may in the future address
additional monitoring and methods
issues related to other criteria pollutants
and hazardous air pollutants. The
AMMS will provide independent advice
to the Administrator through the
CASAC, a chartered Federal Advisory
Committee, under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), as amended (5
U.S.C. App.). The AMMS will comply
with the provisions of FACA and all
appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural
policies.
Request for Nominations: The SAB
Staff Office is seeking nominations of
recognized, national experts in one or
more of the following disciplines:
Atmospheric sciences, dispersion
modeling, atmospheric chemistry,
ecosystem modeling, aquatic chemistry,
environmental science and engineering,
risk assessment, and statistical analysis.
In particular, we seek nominees with
knowledge of ambient air monitoring
methods for criteria pollutants and air
toxics, ambient air network design,
environmental data analysis, quality
assurance, dispersion modeling,
emission inventories for point and
mobile sources, source apportionment
techniques, atmospheric chemistry,
meteorology, and assessment of
ecosystem impacts.
Process and Deadline for Submitting
Nominations: Any interested person or
organization may nominate individuals
qualified in the area of science as
described above to be considered for
appointment to augment the Council for
this review. Candidates also may
nominate themselves. Nominations
should be submitted in electronic
format (which is preferred over hard
copy) following the instructions for
‘‘Nominating Experts to Advisory Panels
and Ad Hoc Committees Being Formed’’
https://www.epa.gov/sab provided on the
SAB Web site. The form can be accessed
through the ‘‘Nomination of Experts’’
link on the blue navigational bar on the
SAB Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
casac. To receive full consideration,
nominations should include all of the
information requested, and should be
submitted in time to arrive no later than
November 10, 2010. EPA values and
welcomes diversity. In an effort to
obtain nominations of diverse
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Notices
candidates, EPA encourages
nominations of women and men of all
racial and ethnic groups.
EPA’s SAB Staff Office requests
contact information about: The person
making the nomination; contact
information about the nominee; the
disciplinary and specific areas of
expertise of the nominee; the nominee’s
curriculum vitae; sources of recent grant
and/or contract support; and a
biographical sketch of the nominee
indicating current position, educational
background, research activities, and
recent service on other national
advisory committees or national
professional organizations.
Persons having questions about the
nomination procedures, or who are
unable to submit nominations through
the SAB Web site, should contact Dr.
Stallworth, DFO, at the contact
information provided above in this
notice. Non-electronic submissions
must follow the same format and
contain the same information as the
electronic.
The SAB Staff Office will
acknowledge receipt of the nomination
and inform nominees of the
Subcommittee for which they have been
nominated. From the nominees
identified by respondents to this
Federal Register notice and other
sources, the SAB Staff Office will
develop a list of candidates for more
detailed consideration. The list of
candidates will be posted on the SAB
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/casac
and will include, for each candidate, the
nominee’s name and biosketch. Public
comments on the list of candidates will
be accepted for 21 calendar days. During
this comment period, the public will be
requested to provide information,
analysis, or other documentation on
nominees that the SAB Staff Office
should consider in evaluating
candidates for the Committee.
For the SAB Staff Office, a balanced
Committee is characterized by inclusion
of candidates who possess the necessary
domains of knowledge, the relevant
scientific perspectives (which, among
other factors, can be influenced by work
history and affiliation) and the
collective breadth of experience to
adequately address the charge. Public
responses to the list of candidates will
be considered in the selection of the
Committee, along with information
provided by candidates and information
gathered by SAB Staff independently
concerning the background of each
candidate (e.g., financial disclosure
information and computer searches to
evaluate a nominee’s prior involvement
with the topic under review). Specific
criteria to be used in evaluation of an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Oct 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
individual Committee member include:
(a) Scientific and/or technical expertise,
knowledge, and experience (primary
factors); (b) absence of financial
conflicts of interest; (c) scientific
credibility and impartiality; (d)
availability and willingness to serve; (e)
ability to work constructively and
effectively in committees; and (f) for the
Committee as a whole, diversity of
scientific expertise and viewpoints.
Prospective candidates will be
required to fill-out the ‘‘Confidential
Financial Disclosure Form for Special
Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’’
(EPA Form 3110–48). This confidential
form allows Government officials to
determine whether there is a statutory
conflict between that person’s public
responsibilities (which includes
membership on an EPA Federal
Advisory Committee) and private
interests and activities, or the
appearance of a lack of impartiality, as
defined by Federal regulation. Ethics
information, including EPA Form 3110–
48, is available on the SAB Web site at
https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/
sabproduct.nsf/Web/
ethics?OpenDocument.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
Vanessa T. Vu,
Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff
Office.
[FR Doc. 2010–26448 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
RIN 3052–AC64
Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement
Farm Credit Administration.
Notice of approval of the draft
joint and several liability reallocation
agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Farm Credit
Administration (FCA or we) is
announcing that it has given approval of
a Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement (Agreement) to
be entered into by all of the banks
(System Banks) of the Farm Credit
System (Farm Credit or System) and the
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding
Corporation (Funding Corporation). The
Agreement is designed to establish a
procedure for non-defaulting banks to
pay maturing System-wide debt on
behalf of defaulting banks prior to a
statutory joint and several call by the
FCA.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64727
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Wilson, Financial Analyst, Office
of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit
Administration, McLean, VA 22102–
5090, (703) 883–4204, TTY (703) 883–
4434, or Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior
Counsel, Office of General Counsel,
Farm Credit Administration, McLean,
VA 22102–5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY
(703) 883–4020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FCA
published the draft Agreement in the
Federal Register on August 18, 2010 (75
FR 51061) with a request for public
comment. The draft Agreement had a
30-day comment period that ended on
September 17, 2010. See 75 FR 51061
for the text of the entire Agreement,
along with our preamble describing the
background of the Agreement and
providing other information. We
received no public comments on the
Agreement.
The Agreement is a voluntary
agreement by the System Banks and the
Funding Corporation that uses a debtbased formula to allocate payments of
non-defaulting banks should a System
bank default on a maturing insured
consolidated or System-wide debt
obligation and the amount of the default
exceeds the amount available in the
Farm Credit Insurance Fund to pay
defaulted insured debt obligations. The
parties to the draft Agreement submitted
it to the FCA for approval under
§ 627.2750(h) of our regulations and also
requested the Farm Credit System
Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) to
provide an expression of non-objection
to the Agreement. The FCSIC insures
consolidated and System-wide
obligations using funds in the Farm
Credit Insurance Fund. The Agreement
will terminate if the FCA withdraws its
approval, and the FCA retains full
authority and responsibility to invoke
statutory joint and several calls as
prescribed under section 4.4(a)(2) and
(d) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as
amended (Act).1 The FCA and the
FCSIC are not parties to the Agreement.
The System Banks and Funding
Corporation are also making conforming
amendments to the Market Access
Agreement (MAA) by adding three new
sections to it. The conforming
amendments are merely to ensure that
provisions in the MAA do not prevent
necessary payments under the
Agreement. The FCA will publish the
conforming MAA amendments in a
separate Federal Register document.
The FCA believes that holders of
System-wide debt obligations are
unlikely to be harmed by this
Agreement. The Agreement could create
1 12
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 2155(a)(2) and (d).
20OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64726-64727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26448]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9215-6]
Science Advisory Board Staff Office; Request for Nominations of
Experts To Serve on the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
Air Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee (AMMS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office is
requesting public nominations of experts to serve on the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Air Monitoring and Methods
Subcommittee (AMMS).
DATES: Nominations should be submitted by November 10, 2010, per
instructions below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public wishing
further information regarding this Notice and Request for Nominations
may contact Dr. Holly Stallworth, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), SAB
Staff Office, by telephone/voice mail at (202) 564-2073; by fax at
(202) 565-2098 or via e-mail at stallworth.holly@epa.gov. General
information concerning the CASAC can be found on the EPA CASAC Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/casac.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) was established under section 109(d)(2) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42 U.S.C. 7409) as an independent
scientific advisory committee. CASAC provides advice, information and
recommendations on the scientific and technical aspects of air quality
criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) under
sections 108 and 109 of the Act.
Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically
review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for the six ``criteria''
air pollutants. EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS) requests independent review and advice from CASAC on the
following subjects:
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)-Sulfur Oxides (SOX) Monitoring
and Network Design--A review of candidate methods for assessing levels
of N and S deposition; specifically constituents such as particulate
sulfate, total oxidized nitrogen (NOy), sulfur dioxide
(SO2), and ammonia gas and ammonia ion combined
(NHX) in the assessment of an Atmospheric Acidification
Potential Index, and the potential network design for a monitoring
system in support of a secondary NOX/SOX NAAQS.
Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS):
Network Re-engineering--Advice on potential revisions to the technical
and regulatory aspects of the PAMS program; including changes to
required measurements and associated network design requirements and a
review of appropriate technology, sampling frequency, and overall
program objectives in the context of the most recently revised ozone
NAAQS and changes to atmospheric chemistry that have occurred over the
past 10-15 years in the most significantly impacted areas.
Network Design Guidance Development for Near-road Ambient
Air Monitoring Requirements: Multi-pollutant Focus--Review of the
progress of a pilot monitoring study including site selection, planned
measurements, and timeline; review of EPA's Near-road Network Design
Technical Assistance Document (first Draft) including assessment of
procedures for identifying maximum site location(s) including
dispersion modeling and evaluation of potential biasing factors and
recommended measurements for near-road compliance network; and a review
of the role of alternative technology such as passive measurement in
compliance and research monitoring studies.
Methods for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)--Advice on
potential improvements to TO-15 with particular emphasis on improving
the characterization of acrolein; review method revisions for canister
cleaning procedures, preparation of calibration standards, performance
testing protocols, and subsequent changes to air quality system
reporting procedures; advice on improvements for TO-13A methodology for
compounds such as naphthalene, other polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
and branched PAHs; and advice on role of new technology in
characterizing volatile and semi-volatile compounds on a real-time or
near real-time basis.
In response to OAQPS request, the Science Advisory Board Staff
Office is requesting public nominations of scientific and technical
experts to form a new subcommittee of the CASAC to provide advice on
the four advisory topics as described above. This subcommittee, the
CASAC Air Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee (AAMS) may in the future
address additional monitoring and methods issues related to other
criteria pollutants and hazardous air pollutants. The AMMS will provide
independent advice to the Administrator through the CASAC, a chartered
Federal Advisory Committee, under the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), as amended (5 U.S.C. App.). The AMMS will comply with the
provisions of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural
policies.
Request for Nominations: The SAB Staff Office is seeking
nominations of recognized, national experts in one or more of the
following disciplines: Atmospheric sciences, dispersion modeling,
atmospheric chemistry, ecosystem modeling, aquatic chemistry,
environmental science and engineering, risk assessment, and statistical
analysis. In particular, we seek nominees with knowledge of ambient air
monitoring methods for criteria pollutants and air toxics, ambient air
network design, environmental data analysis, quality assurance,
dispersion modeling, emission inventories for point and mobile sources,
source apportionment techniques, atmospheric chemistry, meteorology,
and assessment of ecosystem impacts.
Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations: Any interested
person or organization may nominate individuals qualified in the area
of science as described above to be considered for appointment to
augment the Council for this review. Candidates also may nominate
themselves. Nominations should be submitted in electronic format (which
is preferred over hard copy) following the instructions for
``Nominating Experts to Advisory Panels and Ad Hoc Committees Being
Formed'' https://www.epa.gov/sab provided on the SAB Web site. The form
can be accessed through the ``Nomination of Experts'' link on the blue
navigational bar on the SAB Web site at https://www.epa.gov/casac. To
receive full consideration, nominations should include all of the
information requested, and should be submitted in time to arrive no
later than November 10, 2010. EPA values and welcomes diversity. In an
effort to obtain nominations of diverse
[[Page 64727]]
candidates, EPA encourages nominations of women and men of all racial
and ethnic groups.
EPA's SAB Staff Office requests contact information about: The
person making the nomination; contact information about the nominee;
the disciplinary and specific areas of expertise of the nominee; the
nominee's curriculum vitae; sources of recent grant and/or contract
support; and a biographical sketch of the nominee indicating current
position, educational background, research activities, and recent
service on other national advisory committees or national professional
organizations.
Persons having questions about the nomination procedures, or who
are unable to submit nominations through the SAB Web site, should
contact Dr. Stallworth, DFO, at the contact information provided above
in this notice. Non-electronic submissions must follow the same format
and contain the same information as the electronic.
The SAB Staff Office will acknowledge receipt of the nomination and
inform nominees of the Subcommittee for which they have been nominated.
From the nominees identified by respondents to this Federal Register
notice and other sources, the SAB Staff Office will develop a list of
candidates for more detailed consideration. The list of candidates will
be posted on the SAB Web site at https://www.epa.gov/casac and will
include, for each candidate, the nominee's name and biosketch. Public
comments on the list of candidates will be accepted for 21 calendar
days. During this comment period, the public will be requested to
provide information, analysis, or other documentation on nominees that
the SAB Staff Office should consider in evaluating candidates for the
Committee.
For the SAB Staff Office, a balanced Committee is characterized by
inclusion of candidates who possess the necessary domains of knowledge,
the relevant scientific perspectives (which, among other factors, can
be influenced by work history and affiliation) and the collective
breadth of experience to adequately address the charge. Public
responses to the list of candidates will be considered in the selection
of the Committee, along with information provided by candidates and
information gathered by SAB Staff independently concerning the
background of each candidate (e.g., financial disclosure information
and computer searches to evaluate a nominee's prior involvement with
the topic under review). Specific criteria to be used in evaluation of
an individual Committee member include: (a) Scientific and/or technical
expertise, knowledge, and experience (primary factors); (b) absence of
financial conflicts of interest; (c) scientific credibility and
impartiality; (d) availability and willingness to serve; (e) ability to
work constructively and effectively in committees; and (f) for the
Committee as a whole, diversity of scientific expertise and viewpoints.
Prospective candidates will be required to fill-out the
``Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government
Employees Serving on Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency'' (EPA Form 3110-48). This confidential
form allows Government officials to determine whether there is a
statutory conflict between that person's public responsibilities (which
includes membership on an EPA Federal Advisory Committee) and private
interests and activities, or the appearance of a lack of impartiality,
as defined by Federal regulation. Ethics information, including EPA
Form 3110-48, is available on the SAB Web site at https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/Web/ethics?OpenDocument.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
Vanessa T. Vu,
Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-26448 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P