Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-45 Series and CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines, 64681-64683 [2010-26312]
Download as PDF
64681
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 202
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0077; FV10–983–3
CR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Continuance
Referendum
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Referendum order.
AGENCY:
This document directs that a
referendum be conducted among
eligible California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachio producers to
determine whether they favor
continuance of the marketing order
regulating the handling of pistachios
grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from November 1 through
November 20, 2010. To vote in this
referendum, producers must have
produced pistachios in California,
Arizona, or New Mexico during the
period September 1, 2009, through
August 31, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the marketing
order may be obtained from the
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division,
AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B,
Fresno, California, 93721–3129, or the
Office of the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Oct 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov,
respectively.
Pursuant
to Marketing Order No. 983 (7 CFR part
983), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order,’’ and the applicable provisions of
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’
it is hereby directed that a referendum
be conducted to ascertain whether
continuance of the order is favored by
producers. The referendum shall be
conducted from November 1 through
November 20, 2010, among eligible
California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachio producers. Only producers
that were engaged in the production of
pistachios in California, Arizona, or
New Mexico during the period of
September 1, 2009, through August 31,
2010, may participate in the
continuance referendum.
USDA has determined that
continuance referenda are an effective
means for determining whether
producers favor the continuation of
marketing order programs. USDA would
consider termination of the order if less
than two-thirds of the producers voting
in the referendum or producers of less
than two-thirds of the volume of
California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachios represented in the
referendum favor continuance of their
program. In evaluating the merits of
continuance versus termination, USDA
will consider the results of the
continuance referendum and other
relevant information regarding
operation of the order. USDA will
evaluate the order’s relative benefits and
disadvantages to producers, handlers,
and consumers to determine whether
continuing the order would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the ballot materials used in
the referendum herein ordered have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), under
OMB No. 0581–0215, Pistachios Grown
in California, Arizona and New Mexico.
It has been estimated that it will take an
average of 20 minutes for each of the
approximately 840 producers of
California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachios to cast a ballot. Participation
is voluntary. Ballots postmarked after
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
November 20, 2010, will not be
included in the vote tabulation.
Andrea Ricci and Kurt J. Kimmel of
the California Marketing Field Office,
Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS,
USDA, are hereby designated as the
referendum agents of the Secretary of
Agriculture to conduct this referendum.
The procedure applicable to the
referendum shall be the ‘‘Procedure for
the Conduct of Referenda in Connection
With Marketing Orders for Fruits,
Vegetables, and Nuts Pursuant to the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as Amended’’ (7 CFR 900.400–
900.407).
Ballots will be mailed to all producers
of record and may also be obtained from
the referendum agents or from their
appointees.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements and orders,
Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–26333 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0998; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–29–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company (GE) CF6–45 Series
and CF6–50 Series Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for GE
CF6–45 and CF6–50 series turbofan
engines. This proposed AD would
require performing a fluorescent
penetrant inspection (FPI) of the stage 3
low-pressure turbine (LPT) rotor at
every shop visit at which the LPT
module is separated from the engine.
This proposed AD results from seven
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
64682
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
reports of uncontained failures of LPT
stage 3 disks and eight reports of
cracked LPT stage 3 disks found during
shop visit inspections. We are proposing
this AD to prevent LPT rotor separation,
which could result in an uncontained
engine failure and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by December 20,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher J. Richards, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
christopher.j.richards@faa.gov; phone:
(781) 238–7133; fax: (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2010–0998; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–29–AD’’ in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Oct 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
Since July 2008, we have received
seven reports of uncontained failures of
LPT stage 3 rotor disks and eight reports
of cracked LPT rotor stage 3 disks found
during shop visit inspections. Our
investigation revealed that certain part
number LPT stage 3 rotor disks might
fail due to circumferential cracking of
the forward cone body (forward spacer
arm) of the LPT stage 3 disk when
exposed to core engine (N2) vibrations.
On June 4, 2010, we issued AD 2010–
12–10 that requires a separate set of
corrective actions. Those actions, along
with this proposed AD, reduce the
likelihood of further uncontained
engine failures. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in critical lifelimited rotating engine part failure,
which could result in an uncontained
engine failure and damage to the
airplane.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require performing a
fluorescent penetrant inspection at
every shop visit when the LPT module
is separated from the engine.
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions and
we may take further rulemaking actions
in the future.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 387 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 7
work-hours per engine to perform the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed actions, and that the average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. No parts
would be required. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$230,265.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
Affected ADs
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–0998; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–29–AD.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
64683
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by
December 20, 2010.
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–45A, CF6–45A2, CF6–
50A, CF6–50C, CF6–50CA, CF6–50C1, CF6–
50C2, CF6–50C2B, CF6–50C2D, CF6–50C2–F,
CF6–50C2–R, CF6–50E, CF6–50E1, and CF6–
50E2 series turbofan engines, with a lowpressure turbine (LPT) rotor stage 3 disk that
has a part number (P/N) listed in Table 1 of
this AD installed:
TABLE 1—LPT ROTOR STAGE 3 DISK P/NS
1473M90P01
1479M75P01
1479M75P05
1479M75P09
9061M23P06
9061M23P10
9061M23P16
1473M90P02
1479M75P02
1479M75P06
1479M75P11
9061M23P07
9061M23P12
9224M75P01
These engines are installed on, but not
limited to, Boeing 747–200B series, –200C
series, and –200F series, 747–300 series
airplanes; McDonnell Douglas DC–10–15,
–30, and –30F, MD–10–30, KC–10A, and
KDC–10 airplanes; and Airbus A300 series
airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from seven reports of
uncontained failures of LPT stage 3 disks and
eight reports of cracked LPT stage 3 disks
found during shop visit inspections. We are
issuing this AD to prevent LPT rotor
separation, which could result in an
uncontained engine failure and damage to
the airplane.
1473M90P03
1479M75P03
1479M75P07
1479M75P13
9061M23P08
9061M23P14
Related Information
(j) Contact Christopher J. Richards,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA 01803; e-mail:
christopher.j.richards@faa.gov; phone: (781)
238–7133; fax: (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
October 8, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–26312 Filed 10–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed at
each shop visit after the effective date of this
AD, at which the LPT module is separated
from the engine.
Cleaning the LPT Stage 3 Disk
(f) Clean the LPT stage 3 disk, using a wetabrasive blast to eliminate residual or
background fluorescence. You can find
guidance on cleaning the disk in the cleaning
procedure of CF6–50 Engine Manual, GEK
50481 72–57–02.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Inspecting the LPT Stage 3 Disk
(g) Perform a fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the inner diameter of the
forward cone body (forward spacer arm) of
the LPT stage 3 disk. You can find guidance
on performing the FPI in the CF6–50 Engine
Manual, GEK 50481 72–57–02.
(h) If a crack or a band of fluorescence is
present, remove the disk from service.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Oct 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4062 and 4063
RIN 1212–AB20
Liability for Termination of SingleEmployer Plans; Treatment of
Substantial Cessation of Operations
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
PBGC is extending to
November 12, 2010, the comment
period on its proposed rule to provide
guidance on the applicability and
enforcement of ERISA section 4062(e),
which provides for reporting of and
liability for certain substantial
cessations of operations by employers
that maintain single-employer plans.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before November 12, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1473M90P04
1479M75P04
1479M75P08
1479M75P14
9061M23P09
9061M23P15
Comments, identified by
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1212–AB20, may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web
site instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: reg.comments@pbgc.gov.
• Fax: 202–326–4224.
• Mail or hand delivery: Legislative
and Regulatory Department, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026.
All submissions must include the
Regulation Identifier Number for this
rulemaking (RIN 1212–AB20).
Comments received, including personal
information provided, will be posted to
https://www.pbgc.gov. Copies of
comments may also be obtained by
writing to Disclosure Division, Office of
the General Counsel, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026, or
calling 202–326–4040 during normal
business hours. (TTY and TDD users
may call the Federal relay service tollfree at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion, Manager, or Deborah
C. Murphy, Attorney, Regulatory and
Policy Division, Legislative and
Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026; 202–
326–4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
10, 2010 (at 75 FR 48283), Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64681-64683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26312]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0998; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-29-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-45
Series and CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for GE CF6-45 and CF6-50 series turbofan engines. This proposed AD
would require performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) of
the stage 3 low-pressure turbine (LPT) rotor at every shop visit at
which the LPT module is separated from the engine. This proposed AD
results from seven
[[Page 64682]]
reports of uncontained failures of LPT stage 3 disks and eight reports
of cracked LPT stage 3 disks found during shop visit inspections. We
are proposing this AD to prevent LPT rotor separation, which could
result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by December 20,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Richards, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-
mail: christopher.j.richards@faa.gov; phone: (781) 238-7133; fax: (781)
238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0998; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-29-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
Since July 2008, we have received seven reports of uncontained
failures of LPT stage 3 rotor disks and eight reports of cracked LPT
rotor stage 3 disks found during shop visit inspections. Our
investigation revealed that certain part number LPT stage 3 rotor disks
might fail due to circumferential cracking of the forward cone body
(forward spacer arm) of the LPT stage 3 disk when exposed to core
engine (N2) vibrations. On June 4, 2010, we issued AD 2010-12-10 that
requires a separate set of corrective actions. Those actions, along
with this proposed AD, reduce the likelihood of further uncontained
engine failures. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
critical life-limited rotating engine part failure, which could result
in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection at every shop visit when
the LPT module is separated from the engine.
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions and we may take further
rulemaking actions in the future.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 387 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 7 work-hours per engine to perform the proposed actions, and
that the average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. No parts would be
required. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $230,265.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal
[[Page 64683]]
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-0998; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-29-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by December 20,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-45A,
CF6-45A2, CF6-50A, CF6-50C, CF6-50CA, CF6-50C1, CF6-50C2, CF6-50C2B,
CF6-50C2D, CF6-50C2-F, CF6-50C2-R, CF6-50E, CF6-50E1, and CF6-50E2
series turbofan engines, with a low-pressure turbine (LPT) rotor
stage 3 disk that has a part number (P/N) listed in Table 1 of this
AD installed:
Table 1--LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disk P/Ns
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1473M90P01 1473M90P02 1473M90P03 1473M90P04
1479M75P01 1479M75P02 1479M75P03 1479M75P04
1479M75P05 1479M75P06 1479M75P07 1479M75P08
1479M75P09 1479M75P11 1479M75P13 1479M75P14
9061M23P06 9061M23P07 9061M23P08 9061M23P09
9061M23P10 9061M23P12 9061M23P14 9061M23P15
9061M23P16 9224M75P01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These engines are installed on, but not limited to, Boeing 747-
200B series, -200C series, and -200F series, 747-300 series
airplanes; McDonnell Douglas DC-10-15, -30, and -30F, MD-10-30, KC-
10A, and KDC-10 airplanes; and Airbus A300 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from seven reports of uncontained failures
of LPT stage 3 disks and eight reports of cracked LPT stage 3 disks
found during shop visit inspections. We are issuing this AD to
prevent LPT rotor separation, which could result in an uncontained
engine failure and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed at each shop visit after the effective date of this AD,
at which the LPT module is separated from the engine.
Cleaning the LPT Stage 3 Disk
(f) Clean the LPT stage 3 disk, using a wet-abrasive blast to
eliminate residual or background fluorescence. You can find guidance
on cleaning the disk in the cleaning procedure of CF6-50 Engine
Manual, GEK 50481 72-57-02.
Inspecting the LPT Stage 3 Disk
(g) Perform a fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) of the
inner diameter of the forward cone body (forward spacer arm) of the
LPT stage 3 disk. You can find guidance on performing the FPI in the
CF6-50 Engine Manual, GEK 50481 72-57-02.
(h) If a crack or a band of fluorescence is present, remove the
disk from service.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Contact Christopher J. Richards, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
christopher.j.richards@faa.gov; phone: (781) 238-7133; fax: (781)
238-7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 8, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-26312 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P