Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red Grouper Management Measures, 63780-63785 [2010-26197]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
63780
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Recommended Practices 2nd Edition,
2007, and what the results have been.
F.5 Are there statistics available on
the extent to which hazardous liquid
pipeline operators apply the CEPA
practices?
F.6 Are there statistics available that
compare the number of SCC indications
detected and SCC-related failures,
between operators applying the CEPA
practices and those applying other SCC
standards or practices?
F.7 Do the CEPA practices address
the full lifecycle concerns associated
with SCC?
F.8 Are there additional industry
practices that address SCC?
The Effectiveness of SCC Detection
Tools and Methods:
F.9 Are there statistics available on
the extent to which various tools and
methods can accurately detect and
determine the severity of SCC?
F.10 Are tools or methods available
to accurately detect and determine the
severity of SCC when it is associated
with longitudinal pipe seams?
F.11 Should PHMSA require that
operators perform a critical analysis of
all factors that influence SCC to
determine if SCC is a credible threat for
each pipeline segment? What
experience-based indications have
proven reliable in determining whether
SCC could be present?
F.12 Should PHMSA require an
integrity assessment using methods
capable of detecting SCC whenever a
credible threat of SCC is identified?
F.13 Should PHMSA require a
periodic analysis of the effectiveness of
operator corrosion management
programs, which integrate information
about cathodic protection, coating
anomalies, in-line inspection data,
corrosion coupon data, corrosion
inhibitor usage, analysis of corrosion
products, environmental and soil data,
and any other pertinent information
related to corrosion management?
F.14 What further action should be
taken to address corrosion issues?
F.15 If commenters suggest
modification to the existing regulatory
requirements, PHMSA requests that
commenters be as specific as possible.
In addition, PHMSA requests
commenters to provide information and
supporting data related to:
• The potential costs of modifying the
existing regulatory requirements.
• The potential quantifiable safety
and societal benefits of modifying the
existing regulatory requirements.
• The potential impacts on small
businesses of modifying the existing
regulatory requirements.
• The potential environmental
impacts of modifying the existing
regulatory requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
III. Regulatory Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
E.O. 12866 requires agencies to
regulate in the ‘‘most cost-effective
manner,’’ to make a ‘‘reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs,’’
and to develop regulations that ‘‘impose
the least burden on society.’’ We
therefore request comments, including
specific data if possible, concerning the
costs and benefits of revising the
pipeline safety regulations to
accommodate any of the changes
suggested in this advance notice.
B. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by state and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial,
direct effect on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. PHMSA is
inviting comments on the effect a
possible rulemaking adopting any of the
amendments discussed in this
document may have on the relationship
between national government and the
states.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), we must
consider whether a proposed rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
‘‘Small entities’’ include small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000. If your
business or organization is a small
entity and if adoption of any of the
amendments discussed in this ANPRM
could have a significant economic
impact on your operations, please
submit a comment to explain how and
to what extent your business or
organization could be affected.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires Federal
agencies to consider the consequences
of Federal actions and that they prepare
a detailed statement analyzing if the
action significantly affects the quality of
the human environment. Interested
parties are invited to address the
potential environmental impacts of this
ANPRM. We are particularly interested
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in comments about compliance
measures that would provide greater
benefit to the human environment or on
alternative actions the agency could take
that would provide beneficial impacts.
E. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input from Indian tribal
government representatives in the
development of rules that ‘‘significantly
or uniquely affect’’ Indian communities
and that impose ‘‘substantial and direct
compliance costs’’ on such
communities. We invite Indian tribal
governments to provide comments on
any aspect of this ANPRM that may
affect Indian communities.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under 5 CFR Part 1320, PHMSA
analyzes any paperwork burdens if any
information collection will be required
by a rulemaking. We invite comment on
the need for any collection of
information and paperwork burdens, if
any.
G. Privacy Act Statement
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received in response
to any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). DOT’s complete Privacy
Act Statement was published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477).
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.; 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 8,
2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2010–26006 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 100803319–0475–01]
RIN 0648–BA04
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red
Grouper Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
NMFS issues this proposed
rule that would implement actions
identified in a regulatory amendment to
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (FMP) prepared by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council). This proposed rule would
reduce the commercial quota for red
grouper and, thus, the combined
commercial quota for shallow water
grouper (SWG) species, and require
vessels with valid commercial Gulf of
Mexico (Gulf) reef fish permits to mark
their buoy gear with the official vessel
number. This rule also proposes minor
revisions to codified text, including a
revised definition of buoy gear, recodification of the commercial and
recreational quotas for greater
amberjack, revision of the recreational
accountability measure for greater
amberjack, and removal of outdated
language for the red snapper individual
fishing quota (IFQ) program. The
intended effect of this proposed rule is
to help prevent overfishing of red
grouper while achieving optimum yield
(OY) by reducing red grouper harvest
consistent with the findings of the
recent stock assessment for this species,
and to implement technical corrections
to the regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule identified by
0648–BA04 by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit
electronic comments via the Federal
e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
To submit comments through the
Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, enter ‘‘NOAA–
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
NMFS–2010–0161’’ in the keyword
search, then check the box labeled
‘‘Select to find documents accepting
comments or submissions,’’ then select
‘‘Send a comment or submission.’’
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
field if you wish to remain anonymous).
You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Comments received through means
not specified in this rule will not be
considered.
Copies of the regulatory amendment,
which includes an environmental
assessment and a regulatory impact
review, may be obtained from the Gulf
of Mexico Fishery Management Council,
2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100,
Tampa, FL 33607; telephone 813–348–
1630; fax 813–348–1711; e-mail
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org; or may be
downloaded from the Council’s Web
site at https://www.gulfcouncil.org/.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this proposed rule may be
submitted in writing to Rich
Malinowski, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; and OMB, by email at OIRASubmission@omb.eop.gov,
or by fax to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, 727–824–5305.
The reef
fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is
managed under the FMP. The FMP was
prepared by the Council and is
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
NMFS and regional fishery management
councils to prevent overfishing and
achieve, on a continuing basis, the OY
from Federally managed fish stocks.
These mandates are intended to ensure
fishery resources are managed for the
greatest overall benefit to the nation,
particularly with respect to providing
food production and recreational
opportunities, and protecting marine
ecosystems. To further this goal, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires fishery
managers to end overfishing of stocks
while achieving OY from the fishery,
and to minimize bycatch and bycatch
mortality to the extent practicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63781
Status of Stock
Red grouper were declared overfished
and placed under a rebuilding plan in
2004. A 2007 stock assessment
determined that overfishing had ended
and stock biomass had increased to OY.
The 2007 assessment showed the stock
was rebuilt and was close to its OY
spawning stock biomass level. With this
update in stock status, new regulations
were implemented in 2009 (74 FR
17603), that increased the commercial
red grouper quota from 5.31 million lb
(2.41 million kg) to 5.75 million lb (2.61
million kg) and increased the red
grouper recreational bag limit from 1
fish to 2 fish (within a 4-fish grouper
aggregate bag limit). In the same
amendment that established these
regulations (Amendment 30B to the
FMP), the Council set red grouper catch
limits and catch targets. The catch limit
was set at the equilibrium (i.e., longterm average) maximum sustainable
yield (MSY) or the yield for the current
year corresponding to the fishing
mortality at MSY (FMSY). The catch
target was set at the equilibrium OY or
the yield for the current year
corresponding to the fishing mortality at
OY (FOY).
The objective of the 2009 Southeast
Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR)
update assessment for Gulf red grouper
was to update the 2007 SEDAR 12 red
grouper assessment. The 2009 SEDAR
update assessment indicated that the
stock continues to be neither overfished
nor undergoing overfishing. However,
this update assessment indicated the
stock had declined since 2005. A large
part of the decline was attributed to an
episodic mortality event in 2005 (most
likely associated with red tide) that
resulted in an approximate 20 percent
mortality of the red grouper stock, in
addition to mortalities resulting from
fishing and other natural causes. The
hurricanes that impacted the Gulf region
in 2005 are not considered to have
contributed to this decline.
A SEDAR update assessment for Gulf
gag was also conducted in 2009. Recent
discussions of how the update
assessment treated commercial and
recreational discards prompted the
Council to revisit the size distribution of
gag recreational discards and the
magnitude of gag commercial discards
at its August 2010 meeting. Concerns
regarding gag discards became apparent
because of a discrepancy that resulted
from the discard sizes for headboats,
which were assigned using headboat
observer data, and the discard sizes for
the private and charter boats, which
were assigned using a combination of
the Mote Marine Laboratory tagging data
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
63782
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
and four fishery-dependent data
sources. A consequence of this
assignment was that the imputed size
distribution for the private/charter fleets
during the most recent 4 years was
unexpectedly narrow and close to the
recreational minimum size limit;
however, gag discards from headboat
observer data were not truncated, i.e.,
observer discard samples were
distributed across a wider
representation of gag size classes.
Therefore, the Council requested the
assessment review panel reexamine the
update assessment given these
discrepancies in the discard
information. In contrast, red grouper
recreational discard sizes for all
recreational vessels were assigned using
headboat observer data and the imputed
size distribution was not as truncated,
which results in a much less substantial
impact on the outcome of the
assessment. Because the same concerns
were not triggered for red grouper, the
Council did not make a similar request
to reexamine the red grouper
assessment. However, the Council did
recognize the effects discard estimation
could have on the assessment and,
therefore, requested the NMFS
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
review observer discard information to
determine the magnitude of these effects
on red grouper.
Red Grouper Total Allowable Catch
(TAC)
The current red grouper TAC of 7.57
million lb (3.43 million kg),
implemented in 2009 through
Amendment 30B to the FMP, must be
reduced to prevent overfishing of red
grouper. As a result of the findings of
the 2009 stock assessment update, the
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) recommended an
acceptable biological catch (ABC) level
of 6.31 million lb (2.86 million kg). This
amount is equal to 85 percent of the
yield at FMSY, which is expected to
result in a less than 50-percent (15- to
45-percent) probability of overfishing.
To reduce this probability of overfishing
even further, the Council set the TAC at
the yield associated with FOY, which is
consistent with the method used to set
TAC in Amendment 30B to the FMP.
Therefore, a reduced red grouper TAC of
5.68 million lb (2.58 million kg), which
is the yield associated with FOY, is
contained in the regulatory amendment.
Allocation
The recreational and commercial
allocations for red grouper are proposed
to remain consistent with those
established in Amendment 30B to the
FMP. Therefore, 76 percent of the TAC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
would be allocated to the commercial
sector and 24 percent of the TAC would
be allocated to the recreational sector.
Management Measures Contained in
This Proposed Rule
The regulatory amendment would set
TAC for 2011 and subsequent fishing
years at the yield associated with FOY of
5.68 million lb (2.58 million kg). Based
on the current commercial and
recreational allocations, the proposed
TAC would be implemented by setting
the commercial quota for Gulf red
grouper at 4.32 million lb (1.96 million
kg). The decrease in the red grouper
quota by 1.43 million lb (0.65 million
kg) would therefore decrease the
combined SWG quota by 1.43 million lb
(0.65 million kg) to 6.22 million lb (2.82
million kg). This reduced SWG quota
would also be implemented through this
rule.
Management measures for the
recreational sector would remain the
same. The current 2-fish bag limit
would allow red grouper to stay within
the annual target catch of 1.36 million
lb (0.62 million kg). Preliminary
estimates of 2009 recreational landings
remain consistent with recent years at
0.98 million lb (0.44 million kg), which
is lower than the 2011 catch target.
Assuming recreational effort does not
substantially increase in 2011, current
regulations should be adequate to
maintain the harvest at or below the
annual target catch.
Buoy Gear Marking Requirement and
Revised Definition
NMFS proposes requiring buoy gear
used or possessed in the Gulf EEZ to be
marked with the official vessel number
(U.S. Coast Guard documentation
number or State registration number)
and proposes revising the definition of
buoy gear, as defined in § 622.2, through
this rulemaking. Buoy gear is listed as
an authorized gear in the hook-and-line
component of the Gulf reef fish fishery
under the Allowable Gear Rule
(§ 600.725, 64 FR 67511).
In 1990, through Amendment 1 to the
Gulf Reef Fish FMP, the Council
established and NMFS implemented, in
§ 622.34(c), a longline and buoy gear
boundary, shoreward of which the
directed harvest of reef fish with
longlines and buoy gear was prohibited.
After this boundary was established, the
use of buoy gear was reduced
significantly. Many reef fish bottom
longline vessels began using modified
versions of traditional buoy gear to
continue fishing in areas where bottom
longlines were prohibited through
emergency regulations initiated May 1,
2009 (74 FR 20229) and revised October
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21, 2009 (74 FR 53889). Subsequently,
reef fish vessels that did not qualify for
a bottom longline endorsement through
the regulations implementing
Amendment 31 to the Gulf Reef Fish
FMP (75 FR 21512, April 26, 2010) are
converting to buoy gear to continue
fishing for reef fish in the eastern Gulf.
Buoy gear for use in the Gulf reef fish
fishery is legally defined in § 622.2 as
fishing gear consisting of a float and one
or more weighted lines suspended there
from, generally long enough to reach the
bottom. A hook or hooks (usually 6–10)
are on the lines at or near the end. The
float and line(s) drift freely and are
retrieved periodically to remove catch
and re-bait hooks.
NMFS has determined the established
definition of buoy gear is ambiguous
and does not adequately define the type
of gear traditionally used, which limits
the enforceability of restrictions on this
gear type. Under the current definition,
there can be any number of lines
suspended from a float, and although
the number of hooks is recommended to
be 6–10, there is no real restriction on
the number of hooks that can be fished
per float. Therefore, NMFS is proposing
to modify its definition of buoy gear.
The proposed definition is more
specific, which would reduce regulatory
confusion among fishery participants
and would improve enforcement
requirements as this gear type becomes
more commonly used by the
commercial reef fish sector.
Re-Codification of the Quotas for
Greater Amberjack
On June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35335),
NMFS published a temporary rule to
implement accountability measures for
commercial and recreational greater
amberjack in the Gulf for the 2010
fishing year. In the course of this
rulemaking, NMFS inadvertently
removed the commercial and recreation
quotas for greater amberjack for 2011
and subsequent fishing years. This rule
proposes to re-codify those quotas as
specified in § 622.42(a)(1)(v).
Revision to the Recreational
Accountability Measures for Greater
Amberjack
This rule proposes to revise the
recreational accountability measure for
greater amberjack by clarifying that if
recreational landings exceed the quota,
at or near the beginning of the following
fishing year, the quota for that following
fishing year will be reduced by the
amount of the overage in the prior
fishing year. This clarification is an
addition to the current accountability
measure which states that the length of
the recreational fishing season will be
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
reduced by the amount necessary to
recover the overage from the prior
fishing year.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Removal of Outdated Language for the
Red Snapper IFQ Program
On November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67447),
NMFS published a final rule to
implement Amendment 26 to the FMP,
which established the red snapper IFQ
program. During the rulemaking, two
paragraphs of codified text,
§ 622.42(a)(1)(i)(A) and (B), were
inadvertently not removed from the
regulations. This rule proposes to
remove this outdated language.
These additional measures are
unrelated to the actions contained in the
red grouper regulatory amendment.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the regulatory amendment, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for this proposed rule.
The IRFA describes the economic
impact that this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the objectives of,
and legal basis for this action are
contained at the beginning of this
section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A
copy of the full analysis is available
from the Council (see ADDRESSES). A
summary of the IRFA follows.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for the proposed rule.
The proposed rule would reduce the red
grouper commercial quota from 5.75
million lb (2.53 million kg) to 4.32
million lb (1.96 million kg), and thus
the combined SWG commercial quota
from 7.65 million lb (3.47 million kg) as
specified in § 622.42(a)(1)(iii)(A) for
2011 and subsequent fishing years to
6.22 million lb (2.82 million kg) for
2011 and subsequent fishing years, and
require vessels with valid commercial
Gulf reef fish permits to mark their buoy
gear with the official vessel number.
This rule also proposes minor revisions
to the codified text, including a revised
definition of buoy gear, re-codification
of the commercial and recreational
quotas for greater amberjack, revision of
the recreational accountability measure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
for greater amberjack, and removal of
outdated language for the red snapper
IFQ program. The purpose of this
proposed rule is to help prevent
overfishing of red grouper while
achieving OY by reducing red grouper
harvest consistent with the findings of
the recent stock assessment for this
species.
No duplicative, overlapping, or
conflicting Federal rules have been
identified.
This proposed rule is expected to
directly affect commercial harvesting
operations. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the U.S. including fish
harvesters. A business involved in fish
harvesting is classified as a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its
field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4.0 million
(NAICS code 114111, finfish fishing) for
all its affiliated operations worldwide.
This proposed rule is expected to
directly affect commercial fishing
vessels whose owners possess
commercial Gulf reef fish permits or red
grouper fishing quota shares. As of
August 10, 2010, 951 entities possessed
a valid or renewable Gulf reef fish
permit. These 951 entities are expected
to be directly affected by the proposed
action to require vessels to mark their
buoy gear with their official vessel
number.
As of October 1, 2009, 970 entities
owned a valid commercial Gulf reef fish
permit and thus were eligible for initial
shares and allocation in the grouper and
tilefish IFQ program. Of these 970
entities, 908 entities initially received
shares and allocation of grouper or
tilefish, and 815 entities specifically
received red grouper shares and an
initial allocation of the commercial
sector’s red grouper quota in 2010.
These 815 entities are expected to be
directly affected by the proposed action
to reduce the red grouper commercial
quota.
Of the 815 entities that initially
received red grouper shares, 191 were
not commercially fishing in 2008 or
2009 and thus had no commercial
fishing revenue during these years. On
average, these 191 entities received an
initial allocation of 6,459 lb (2,936 kg)
of red grouper in 2010. Eight of these
191 entities also received a bottom
longline endorsement in 2010. These 8
entities received a much higher initial
allocation of red grouper in 2010, with
an average of approximately 44,000 lb
(20,000 kg).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63783
The other 624 entities that initially
received red grouper shares and
allocations in 2010 were active in
commercial fisheries in 2008 or 2009.
The maximum annual commercial
fishing revenue in 2008 or 2009 by an
individual vessel with a commercial
Gulf reef fish permit or red grouper
fishing quota shares was approximately
$606,000 (2008 dollars). Based on this
value, all commercial fishing vessels
expected to be directly affected by this
proposed rule are determined for the
purpose of this analysis to be small
business entities.
Of the 624 commercial fishing vessels
with commercial landings in 2008 or
2009, 126 vessels did not have any red
grouper landings in 2008 or 2009. Their
average annual gross revenue in these 2
years was approximately $55,800 (2008
dollars). The vast majority of these
vessels’ commercial fishing revenue is
from a combination of landings of
snapper, mackerel, dolphin, and wahoo.
However, as described in the regulatory
amendment, in 2009, they did become
relatively more dependent on landings
of highly migratory species (HMS)
species and relatively less dependent on
landings of deep-water grouper species.
On average, in 2010, these vessels
received an initial allocation of 2,524 lb
(1,147) of red grouper quota. Five of
these vessels also received a bottom
longline endorsement in 2010.
The remaining 498 commercially
active fishing vessels did have landings
of red grouper in 2008 or 2009. Their
average annual gross revenue from
commercial fishing was approximately
$66,000 (2008 dollars) between the two
years. On average, these vessels had
9,425 lb (4,284 kg) and 6,734 lb (3,061
kg) of red grouper landings in 2008 and
2009 respectively, or 8,053 lb (3,660 kg)
between the 2 years. Red grouper
landings accounted for approximately
35 percent of these vessels’ annual
average gross revenue, and thus they are
relatively dependent on revenue from
red grouper landings. These vessels’
average initial red grouper allocation in
2010 was 8,404 lb (3,820 kg). Therefore,
on average, their 2008 and 2009 red
grouper landings are very near their
2010 red grouper allocation, though
their red grouper landings differed
considerably between 2008 and 2009.
Of these 498 vessels, 49 vessels also
received a bottom longline endorsement
in 2010. These particular vessels’
average annual revenue was
approximately $156,000 (2008 dollars)
in 2008 and 2009. Revenue from red
grouper landings decreased from
approximately $104,000 to $65,000 in
2009. Nonetheless, these vessels remain
highly dependent on revenue from red
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
63784
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
grouper landings, which averaged
approximately 36,000 lb (13,364 kg) in
2008 and 23,000 lb (10,455 kg) in 2009.
Their average initial 2010 allocation of
red grouper was approximately 42,000
lb (19,091 kg) and thus their recent
year’s harvest has been within that 2010
average allocation, particularly in 2009.
The proposed rule would not alter
existing reporting or record keeping
requirements but would alter certain
compliance requirements. Specifically,
vessels with valid commercial Gulf reef
fish permits would be required to mark
their buoy gear with their official vessel
number. The most significant burden
imposed by this requirement is the time
needed to mark the gear. Under the
proposed definition of buoy gear, the
maximum number of buoys per vessel is
expected to be 20. The time required to
mark each buoy is estimated to be
approximately 20 minutes. Thus, the
annual time burden per vessel is
approximately 6.67 hours. According to
the most recent data from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS), the average
nominal wage for fishers and fishing
related workers is $12.79, or $12.74 in
2008 dollars. This value is used as a
monetary estimate of the opportunity
cost of time on a per hour basis. Thus,
the annual opportunity cost per vessel
resulting from this requirement is
estimated to be approximately $85. For
the 951 vessels with valid or renewable
commercial Gulf reef fish permits, the
annual opportunity cost is estimated to
be $80,812. Since opportunity costs
impose no direct financial costs, this
increase in opportunity costs is not
expected to reduce profit for these
vessels.
The 191 entities with red grouper
shares that did not participate in
commercial fishing in 2008 or 2009
have no commercial fishing revenue and
did not earn profit from commercial
fishing in those 2 years. Under the
proposed action to decrease the red
grouper commercial quota, allocation of
red grouper in 2011 would be reduced,
on average, by approximately 1,608 lb
(731 kg). Using the 2008 average price
of $2.85 per lb, this loss in allocation
could potentially represent an annual
loss of nearly $4,600 in gross revenue
per entity. For the eight entities with red
grouper shares that also possess longline
endorsements, the average annual
allocation of red grouper would be
reduced by nearly 11,000 lb (5,000 kg).
Thus, the potential loss in gross
revenue, estimated to be nearly $31,400,
could be much higher. However, in
general, this potential loss in gross
revenue could only reduce profit if
these entities not only become active in
commercial fishing, but specifically
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
intend to harvest red grouper in 2011
and at a level above their reduced
allocation. It is important to note that
the commercial sector has not harvested
the commercial red grouper quota since
the 2006 fishing year. Alternatively,
these potential losses in gross revenue
could be due to these entities’ inability
to sell the allocations they are losing
under the proposed action, though this
possibility presumes that a demand for
these allocations exists. Regardless, the
significance of this potential loss in
gross revenue to these 191 entities
cannot be evaluated given the lack of
information on potential gross revenue
and profit from commercial fishing in
general and specifically for red grouper.
Profit estimates are not currently
available for the 126 entities with red
grouper shares that participated in
commercial fisheries other than red
grouper. However, since these vessels
did not have any red grouper landings,
none of their gross revenue and thus
none of their profit were the result of
red grouper harvests. Under the
proposed action to decrease the red
grouper commercial quota, the average
allocation of red grouper in 2011 would
be reduced by approximately 629 lb
(286 kg). Using the 2008 average price
of $2.85 per pound, this loss in
allocation could potentially represent an
annual loss of nearly $1,800 in gross
revenue per entity. However, this
potential loss in gross revenue could
only lead to a loss in profit if these
entities intend to become active in the
red grouper component of the Gulf reef
fish fishery in 2011 and at a level above
their reduced allocation. Thus, for
example, assuming these vessels intend
to harvest red grouper in 2011 at a level
equivalent to their 2010 allocation, and
this harvest was in addition to, rather
than in place of, their recent commercial
fishing activities, the reduction in
allocation could lead to a maximum loss
of approximately three percent in gross
revenue which could in turn reduce
profit. Alternatively, losses in gross
revenue could be due to these entities’
inability to sell the allocations being lost
under the proposed action, though this
possibility presumes that a demand for
the allocations exists.
Profit estimates are not currently
available for the 498 entities with red
grouper shares that participated in the
commercial red grouper sector of the
Gulf reef fish fishery in 2008 or 2009.
Under the proposed action to decrease
the red grouper quota, these vessels’ red
grouper allocations would be reduced
by approximately 2,092 lb (951 kg) on
average. As these vessels have been
harvesting at levels near their 2010
allocation in recent years on average,
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
this reduction in red grouper allocation
is likely to lead to a future reduction in
red grouper landings and therefore gross
revenue. Using the average 2008 price of
$2.85 per pound, it is estimated that
these vessels could lose nearly $6,000,
or approximately 9 percent, in average
annual gross revenue. A loss in gross
revenue of this magnitude would likely
lead to a reduction in profit.
However, for the 49 vessels with red
grouper shares that were active in the
red grouper component of the Gulf reef
fish fishery and also received a bottom
longline endorsement in 2010, their
allocation of red grouper in 2011 would
decrease by approximately 10,400 lb
(4,727 kg) under the proposed action.
For these particular vessels, the loss in
red grouper landings could range from
zero to the full amount of the decrease
in allocation, though the latter is
unlikely given new regulations
restricting the use of longline gear. Even
if these vessels intended to harvest red
grouper in 2011 at levels comparable to
2008, prior to the implementation of
regulations restricting the use of
longline gear, they would only lose
approximately 4,600 lb (2,091 kg) in red
grouper landings rather than the full
amount of their reduced allocation. This
loss in landings is estimated to be
valued at approximately $13,000 in
gross revenue, or 8 percent of their
average annual gross revenue. Such a
loss in gross revenue would likely
reduce their profit. However, if they
intend to harvest at levels comparable to
2009, then their reduced allocation
would still be above their intended
landings. Therefore, the reduction in
allocation would not lead to a reduction
in landings from what they would have
otherwise been and thus gross revenue
and profit would also not be reduced.
Two alternatives, including the status
quo, were considered for the action to
reduce the red grouper commercial
quota to 4.32 million lb (1.96 million
kg). The first alternative, the status quo,
would have maintained the red grouper
commercial quota at the current level of
5.75 million lb (2.61 million kg). This
alternative is not consistent with the
goals and objectives of the Council’s
plan to manage red grouper to achieve
the mandates of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. Specifically, this alternative would
be inconsistent with current National
Standard 1 guidance because the
associated TAC of 7.57 million lb (3.43
million kg) would be above the ABC of
6.31 million lb (2.86 million kg)
recommended by the Council’s SSC.
The second alternative would have
would set the red grouper commercial
quota at 4.80 million lb (2.18 million
kg). This amount is equal to 85 percent
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
of the yield at FMSY, which the SSC
considered sufficient to reduce the
probability that overfishing might occur
in 2011. However, this alternative is
inconsistent with the method
established by the Council in
Amendment 30B where the annual
catch target would be based on the yield
associated with FOY.
One alternative, the status quo, was
considered for the action to require
vessels with valid commercial Gulf reef
fish permits to mark their buoy gear
with the official vessel number. The
Council and NMFS have determined
that the current definition of buoy gear
is ambiguous. This ambiguity has led to
problems with monitoring and
enforcement of buoy gear regulations
and thus a clearer definition of this gear
type is being proposed. By not requiring
the marking of buoy gear, this
alternative would not improve the
monitoring and enforcement of buoy
gear regulations since law enforcement
personnel would not be able to
determine which vessel deployed the
gear if the gear is left unattended.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection-of-information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), unless that
collection-of-information displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number.
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the PRA applicable to vessels
in the Gulf reef fish fishery, namely, a
requirement to mark buoy gear with the
official vessel number (U.S. Coast Guard
documentation number or State
registration number).
This requirement has been submitted
to OMB for approval. The public
reporting burden for this collection-ofinformation is estimated to average 20
minutes per buoy. This estimate of the
public reporting burden includes the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection-of-information. Public
comment is sought regarding: Whether
this proposed collection-of-information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collectionof-information, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
or other forms of information
technology. Send comments regarding
the burden estimate or any other aspect
of the collection-of-information
requirement, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS and to
OMB (see ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.2, the definition of ‘‘buoy
gear’’ is revised to read as follows:
§ 622.2
Definitions and acronyms.
*
*
*
*
*
Buoy gear means fishing gear that
fishes vertically in the water column
that consists of a single drop line
suspended from a float, from which no
more than 10 hooks can be connected
between the buoy and the terminal end,
and the terminal end contains a weight
that is no more than 10 lb (4.5 kg). The
drop line can be rope (hemp, manila,
cotton or other natural fibers; nylon,
polypropylene, spectra or other
synthetic material) or monofilament, but
must not be cable or wire. The gear is
free-floating and not connected to other
gear or the vessel. The drop line must
be no greater than 2 times the depth of
the water being fished. All hooks must
be attached to the drop line no more
than 30 ft (9.1 m) from the weighted
terminal end. These hooks may be
attached directly to the drop line;
attached as snoods (defined as an
offshoot line that is directly spliced, tied
or otherwise connected to the drop
line), where each snood has a single
terminal hook; or as gangions (defined
as an offshoot line connected to the
drop line with some type of detachable
clip), where each gangion has a single
terminal hook.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 622.6, paragraph (b)(3) is added
to read as follows:
§ 622.6
*
PO 00000
*
Vessel and gear identification.
*
Frm 00062
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 9990
63785
(b) * * *
(3) Buoy gear. In the Gulf EEZ, if buoy
gear is used or possessed, each buoy
must display the official number of the
vessel.
4. In § 622.42, the first sentence of the
introductory text is revised; paragraphs
(a)(1)(i)(A) and (B) are removed;
paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)(A) and (C) are
revised; and paragraphs (a)(1)(v) and
(a)(2)(ii) are added to read as follows:
§ 622.42
Quotas.
Quotas apply for the fishing year for
each species or species group, unless
accountability measures are
implemented during the fishing year
pursuant to § 622.49, due to a quota
overage occurring the previous year, in
which case a reduced quota will be
specified through notification in the
Federal Register. * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) SWG combined—6.22 million lb
(2.82 million kg).
*
*
*
*
*
(C) Red grouper—4.32 million lb (1.96
million kg).
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Greater amberjack—503,000 lb
(228,157 kg), round weight.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) Recreational quota for greater
amberjack. The recreational quota for
greater amberjack is 1,368,000 lb
(620,514 kg), round weight.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 622.49, the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) is revised to read as
follows:
§ 622.49
Accountability measures.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * * In addition, if despite such
closure, recreational landings exceed
the quota, the AA will file a notification
with the Office of the Federal Register,
at or near the beginning of the following
fishing year, to reduce the quota for that
following year by the amount of the
overage in the prior fishing year, and to
reduce the length of the recreational
fishing season for the following fishing
year by the amount necessary to recover
the overage from the prior fishing year.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–26197 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\18OCP1.SGM
18OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63780-63785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 100803319-0475-01]
RIN 0648-BA04
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red Grouper Management
Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
[[Page 63781]]
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed rule that would implement actions
identified in a regulatory amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for
the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP) prepared by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council). This proposed rule
would reduce the commercial quota for red grouper and, thus, the
combined commercial quota for shallow water grouper (SWG) species, and
require vessels with valid commercial Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) reef fish
permits to mark their buoy gear with the official vessel number. This
rule also proposes minor revisions to codified text, including a
revised definition of buoy gear, re-codification of the commercial and
recreational quotas for greater amberjack, revision of the recreational
accountability measure for greater amberjack, and removal of outdated
language for the red snapper individual fishing quota (IFQ) program.
The intended effect of this proposed rule is to help prevent
overfishing of red grouper while achieving optimum yield (OY) by
reducing red grouper harvest consistent with the findings of the recent
stock assessment for this species, and to implement technical
corrections to the regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule identified by
0648-BA04 by any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Submit electronic comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: No comments will be posted for public viewing until
after the comment period has closed. All comments received are a part
of the public record and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
To submit comments through the Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov, enter ``NOAA-NMFS-2010-0161'' in the keyword
search, then check the box labeled ``Select to find documents accepting
comments or submissions,'' then select ``Send a comment or
submission.'' NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the
required field if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Comments received through means not specified in this rule will not
be considered.
Copies of the regulatory amendment, which includes an environmental
assessment and a regulatory impact review, may be obtained from the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 2203 North Lois Avenue,
Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone 813-348-1630; fax 813-348-1711;
e-mail gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org; or may be downloaded from the
Council's Web site at https://www.gulfcouncil.org/.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted in writing to Rich Malinowski, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701; and OMB,
by e-mail at OIRASubmission@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Hood, 727-824-5305.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council and is
implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS and regional fishery
management councils to prevent overfishing and achieve, on a continuing
basis, the OY from Federally managed fish stocks. These mandates are
intended to ensure fishery resources are managed for the greatest
overall benefit to the nation, particularly with respect to providing
food production and recreational opportunities, and protecting marine
ecosystems. To further this goal, the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
fishery managers to end overfishing of stocks while achieving OY from
the fishery, and to minimize bycatch and bycatch mortality to the
extent practicable.
Status of Stock
Red grouper were declared overfished and placed under a rebuilding
plan in 2004. A 2007 stock assessment determined that overfishing had
ended and stock biomass had increased to OY. The 2007 assessment showed
the stock was rebuilt and was close to its OY spawning stock biomass
level. With this update in stock status, new regulations were
implemented in 2009 (74 FR 17603), that increased the commercial red
grouper quota from 5.31 million lb (2.41 million kg) to 5.75 million lb
(2.61 million kg) and increased the red grouper recreational bag limit
from 1 fish to 2 fish (within a 4-fish grouper aggregate bag limit). In
the same amendment that established these regulations (Amendment 30B to
the FMP), the Council set red grouper catch limits and catch targets.
The catch limit was set at the equilibrium (i.e., long-term average)
maximum sustainable yield (MSY) or the yield for the current year
corresponding to the fishing mortality at MSY (FMSY). The
catch target was set at the equilibrium OY or the yield for the current
year corresponding to the fishing mortality at OY (FOY).
The objective of the 2009 Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review
(SEDAR) update assessment for Gulf red grouper was to update the 2007
SEDAR 12 red grouper assessment. The 2009 SEDAR update assessment
indicated that the stock continues to be neither overfished nor
undergoing overfishing. However, this update assessment indicated the
stock had declined since 2005. A large part of the decline was
attributed to an episodic mortality event in 2005 (most likely
associated with red tide) that resulted in an approximate 20 percent
mortality of the red grouper stock, in addition to mortalities
resulting from fishing and other natural causes. The hurricanes that
impacted the Gulf region in 2005 are not considered to have contributed
to this decline.
A SEDAR update assessment for Gulf gag was also conducted in 2009.
Recent discussions of how the update assessment treated commercial and
recreational discards prompted the Council to revisit the size
distribution of gag recreational discards and the magnitude of gag
commercial discards at its August 2010 meeting. Concerns regarding gag
discards became apparent because of a discrepancy that resulted from
the discard sizes for headboats, which were assigned using headboat
observer data, and the discard sizes for the private and charter boats,
which were assigned using a combination of the Mote Marine Laboratory
tagging data
[[Page 63782]]
and four fishery-dependent data sources. A consequence of this
assignment was that the imputed size distribution for the private/
charter fleets during the most recent 4 years was unexpectedly narrow
and close to the recreational minimum size limit; however, gag discards
from headboat observer data were not truncated, i.e., observer discard
samples were distributed across a wider representation of gag size
classes.
Therefore, the Council requested the assessment review panel
reexamine the update assessment given these discrepancies in the
discard information. In contrast, red grouper recreational discard
sizes for all recreational vessels were assigned using headboat
observer data and the imputed size distribution was not as truncated,
which results in a much less substantial impact on the outcome of the
assessment. Because the same concerns were not triggered for red
grouper, the Council did not make a similar request to reexamine the
red grouper assessment. However, the Council did recognize the effects
discard estimation could have on the assessment and, therefore,
requested the NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center review observer
discard information to determine the magnitude of these effects on red
grouper.
Red Grouper Total Allowable Catch (TAC)
The current red grouper TAC of 7.57 million lb (3.43 million kg),
implemented in 2009 through Amendment 30B to the FMP, must be reduced
to prevent overfishing of red grouper. As a result of the findings of
the 2009 stock assessment update, the Council's Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) recommended an acceptable biological catch
(ABC) level of 6.31 million lb (2.86 million kg). This amount is equal
to 85 percent of the yield at FMSY, which is expected to
result in a less than 50-percent (15- to 45-percent) probability of
overfishing. To reduce this probability of overfishing even further,
the Council set the TAC at the yield associated with FOY,
which is consistent with the method used to set TAC in Amendment 30B to
the FMP. Therefore, a reduced red grouper TAC of 5.68 million lb (2.58
million kg), which is the yield associated with FOY, is
contained in the regulatory amendment.
Allocation
The recreational and commercial allocations for red grouper are
proposed to remain consistent with those established in Amendment 30B
to the FMP. Therefore, 76 percent of the TAC would be allocated to the
commercial sector and 24 percent of the TAC would be allocated to the
recreational sector.
Management Measures Contained in This Proposed Rule
The regulatory amendment would set TAC for 2011 and subsequent
fishing years at the yield associated with FOY of 5.68
million lb (2.58 million kg). Based on the current commercial and
recreational allocations, the proposed TAC would be implemented by
setting the commercial quota for Gulf red grouper at 4.32 million lb
(1.96 million kg). The decrease in the red grouper quota by 1.43
million lb (0.65 million kg) would therefore decrease the combined SWG
quota by 1.43 million lb (0.65 million kg) to 6.22 million lb (2.82
million kg). This reduced SWG quota would also be implemented through
this rule.
Management measures for the recreational sector would remain the
same. The current 2-fish bag limit would allow red grouper to stay
within the annual target catch of 1.36 million lb (0.62 million kg).
Preliminary estimates of 2009 recreational landings remain consistent
with recent years at 0.98 million lb (0.44 million kg), which is lower
than the 2011 catch target. Assuming recreational effort does not
substantially increase in 2011, current regulations should be adequate
to maintain the harvest at or below the annual target catch.
Buoy Gear Marking Requirement and Revised Definition
NMFS proposes requiring buoy gear used or possessed in the Gulf EEZ
to be marked with the official vessel number (U.S. Coast Guard
documentation number or State registration number) and proposes
revising the definition of buoy gear, as defined in Sec. 622.2,
through this rulemaking. Buoy gear is listed as an authorized gear in
the hook-and-line component of the Gulf reef fish fishery under the
Allowable Gear Rule (Sec. 600.725, 64 FR 67511).
In 1990, through Amendment 1 to the Gulf Reef Fish FMP, the Council
established and NMFS implemented, in Sec. 622.34(c), a longline and
buoy gear boundary, shoreward of which the directed harvest of reef
fish with longlines and buoy gear was prohibited. After this boundary
was established, the use of buoy gear was reduced significantly. Many
reef fish bottom longline vessels began using modified versions of
traditional buoy gear to continue fishing in areas where bottom
longlines were prohibited through emergency regulations initiated May
1, 2009 (74 FR 20229) and revised October 21, 2009 (74 FR 53889).
Subsequently, reef fish vessels that did not qualify for a bottom
longline endorsement through the regulations implementing Amendment 31
to the Gulf Reef Fish FMP (75 FR 21512, April 26, 2010) are converting
to buoy gear to continue fishing for reef fish in the eastern Gulf.
Buoy gear for use in the Gulf reef fish fishery is legally defined
in Sec. 622.2 as fishing gear consisting of a float and one or more
weighted lines suspended there from, generally long enough to reach the
bottom. A hook or hooks (usually 6-10) are on the lines at or near the
end. The float and line(s) drift freely and are retrieved periodically
to remove catch and re-bait hooks.
NMFS has determined the established definition of buoy gear is
ambiguous and does not adequately define the type of gear traditionally
used, which limits the enforceability of restrictions on this gear
type. Under the current definition, there can be any number of lines
suspended from a float, and although the number of hooks is recommended
to be 6-10, there is no real restriction on the number of hooks that
can be fished per float. Therefore, NMFS is proposing to modify its
definition of buoy gear. The proposed definition is more specific,
which would reduce regulatory confusion among fishery participants and
would improve enforcement requirements as this gear type becomes more
commonly used by the commercial reef fish sector.
Re-Codification of the Quotas for Greater Amberjack
On June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35335), NMFS published a temporary rule to
implement accountability measures for commercial and recreational
greater amberjack in the Gulf for the 2010 fishing year. In the course
of this rulemaking, NMFS inadvertently removed the commercial and
recreation quotas for greater amberjack for 2011 and subsequent fishing
years. This rule proposes to re-codify those quotas as specified in
Sec. 622.42(a)(1)(v).
Revision to the Recreational Accountability Measures for Greater
Amberjack
This rule proposes to revise the recreational accountability
measure for greater amberjack by clarifying that if recreational
landings exceed the quota, at or near the beginning of the following
fishing year, the quota for that following fishing year will be reduced
by the amount of the overage in the prior fishing year. This
clarification is an addition to the current accountability measure
which states that the length of the recreational fishing season will be
[[Page 63783]]
reduced by the amount necessary to recover the overage from the prior
fishing year.
Removal of Outdated Language for the Red Snapper IFQ Program
On November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67447), NMFS published a final rule to
implement Amendment 26 to the FMP, which established the red snapper
IFQ program. During the rulemaking, two paragraphs of codified text,
Sec. 622.42(a)(1)(i)(A) and (B), were inadvertently not removed from
the regulations. This rule proposes to remove this outdated language.
These additional measures are unrelated to the actions contained in
the red grouper regulatory amendment.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the regulatory amendment, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for this proposed rule. The IRFA describes the
economic impact that this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on
small entities. A description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the objectives of, and legal basis for this action are
contained at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A copy of the full analysis is
available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA
follows.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for the
proposed rule. The proposed rule would reduce the red grouper
commercial quota from 5.75 million lb (2.53 million kg) to 4.32 million
lb (1.96 million kg), and thus the combined SWG commercial quota from
7.65 million lb (3.47 million kg) as specified in Sec.
622.42(a)(1)(iii)(A) for 2011 and subsequent fishing years to 6.22
million lb (2.82 million kg) for 2011 and subsequent fishing years, and
require vessels with valid commercial Gulf reef fish permits to mark
their buoy gear with the official vessel number. This rule also
proposes minor revisions to the codified text, including a revised
definition of buoy gear, re-codification of the commercial and
recreational quotas for greater amberjack, revision of the recreational
accountability measure for greater amberjack, and removal of outdated
language for the red snapper IFQ program. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to help prevent overfishing of red grouper while achieving OY
by reducing red grouper harvest consistent with the findings of the
recent stock assessment for this species.
No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules have been
identified.
This proposed rule is expected to directly affect commercial
harvesting operations. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has
established size criteria for all major industry sectors in the U.S.
including fish harvesters. A business involved in fish harvesting is
classified as a small business if it is independently owned and
operated, is not dominant in its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual receipts not in excess of $4.0
million (NAICS code 114111, finfish fishing) for all its affiliated
operations worldwide.
This proposed rule is expected to directly affect commercial
fishing vessels whose owners possess commercial Gulf reef fish permits
or red grouper fishing quota shares. As of August 10, 2010, 951
entities possessed a valid or renewable Gulf reef fish permit. These
951 entities are expected to be directly affected by the proposed
action to require vessels to mark their buoy gear with their official
vessel number.
As of October 1, 2009, 970 entities owned a valid commercial Gulf
reef fish permit and thus were eligible for initial shares and
allocation in the grouper and tilefish IFQ program. Of these 970
entities, 908 entities initially received shares and allocation of
grouper or tilefish, and 815 entities specifically received red grouper
shares and an initial allocation of the commercial sector's red grouper
quota in 2010. These 815 entities are expected to be directly affected
by the proposed action to reduce the red grouper commercial quota.
Of the 815 entities that initially received red grouper shares, 191
were not commercially fishing in 2008 or 2009 and thus had no
commercial fishing revenue during these years. On average, these 191
entities received an initial allocation of 6,459 lb (2,936 kg) of red
grouper in 2010. Eight of these 191 entities also received a bottom
longline endorsement in 2010. These 8 entities received a much higher
initial allocation of red grouper in 2010, with an average of
approximately 44,000 lb (20,000 kg).
The other 624 entities that initially received red grouper shares
and allocations in 2010 were active in commercial fisheries in 2008 or
2009. The maximum annual commercial fishing revenue in 2008 or 2009 by
an individual vessel with a commercial Gulf reef fish permit or red
grouper fishing quota shares was approximately $606,000 (2008 dollars).
Based on this value, all commercial fishing vessels expected to be
directly affected by this proposed rule are determined for the purpose
of this analysis to be small business entities.
Of the 624 commercial fishing vessels with commercial landings in
2008 or 2009, 126 vessels did not have any red grouper landings in 2008
or 2009. Their average annual gross revenue in these 2 years was
approximately $55,800 (2008 dollars). The vast majority of these
vessels' commercial fishing revenue is from a combination of landings
of snapper, mackerel, dolphin, and wahoo. However, as described in the
regulatory amendment, in 2009, they did become relatively more
dependent on landings of highly migratory species (HMS) species and
relatively less dependent on landings of deep-water grouper species. On
average, in 2010, these vessels received an initial allocation of 2,524
lb (1,147) of red grouper quota. Five of these vessels also received a
bottom longline endorsement in 2010.
The remaining 498 commercially active fishing vessels did have
landings of red grouper in 2008 or 2009. Their average annual gross
revenue from commercial fishing was approximately $66,000 (2008
dollars) between the two years. On average, these vessels had 9,425 lb
(4,284 kg) and 6,734 lb (3,061 kg) of red grouper landings in 2008 and
2009 respectively, or 8,053 lb (3,660 kg) between the 2 years. Red
grouper landings accounted for approximately 35 percent of these
vessels' annual average gross revenue, and thus they are relatively
dependent on revenue from red grouper landings. These vessels' average
initial red grouper allocation in 2010 was 8,404 lb (3,820 kg).
Therefore, on average, their 2008 and 2009 red grouper landings are
very near their 2010 red grouper allocation, though their red grouper
landings differed considerably between 2008 and 2009.
Of these 498 vessels, 49 vessels also received a bottom longline
endorsement in 2010. These particular vessels' average annual revenue
was approximately $156,000 (2008 dollars) in 2008 and 2009. Revenue
from red grouper landings decreased from approximately $104,000 to
$65,000 in 2009. Nonetheless, these vessels remain highly dependent on
revenue from red
[[Page 63784]]
grouper landings, which averaged approximately 36,000 lb (13,364 kg) in
2008 and 23,000 lb (10,455 kg) in 2009. Their average initial 2010
allocation of red grouper was approximately 42,000 lb (19,091 kg) and
thus their recent year's harvest has been within that 2010 average
allocation, particularly in 2009.
The proposed rule would not alter existing reporting or record
keeping requirements but would alter certain compliance requirements.
Specifically, vessels with valid commercial Gulf reef fish permits
would be required to mark their buoy gear with their official vessel
number. The most significant burden imposed by this requirement is the
time needed to mark the gear. Under the proposed definition of buoy
gear, the maximum number of buoys per vessel is expected to be 20. The
time required to mark each buoy is estimated to be approximately 20
minutes. Thus, the annual time burden per vessel is approximately 6.67
hours. According to the most recent data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS), the average nominal wage for fishers and fishing
related workers is $12.79, or $12.74 in 2008 dollars. This value is
used as a monetary estimate of the opportunity cost of time on a per
hour basis. Thus, the annual opportunity cost per vessel resulting from
this requirement is estimated to be approximately $85. For the 951
vessels with valid or renewable commercial Gulf reef fish permits, the
annual opportunity cost is estimated to be $80,812. Since opportunity
costs impose no direct financial costs, this increase in opportunity
costs is not expected to reduce profit for these vessels.
The 191 entities with red grouper shares that did not participate
in commercial fishing in 2008 or 2009 have no commercial fishing
revenue and did not earn profit from commercial fishing in those 2
years. Under the proposed action to decrease the red grouper commercial
quota, allocation of red grouper in 2011 would be reduced, on average,
by approximately 1,608 lb (731 kg). Using the 2008 average price of
$2.85 per lb, this loss in allocation could potentially represent an
annual loss of nearly $4,600 in gross revenue per entity. For the eight
entities with red grouper shares that also possess longline
endorsements, the average annual allocation of red grouper would be
reduced by nearly 11,000 lb (5,000 kg). Thus, the potential loss in
gross revenue, estimated to be nearly $31,400, could be much higher.
However, in general, this potential loss in gross revenue could only
reduce profit if these entities not only become active in commercial
fishing, but specifically intend to harvest red grouper in 2011 and at
a level above their reduced allocation. It is important to note that
the commercial sector has not harvested the commercial red grouper
quota since the 2006 fishing year. Alternatively, these potential
losses in gross revenue could be due to these entities' inability to
sell the allocations they are losing under the proposed action, though
this possibility presumes that a demand for these allocations exists.
Regardless, the significance of this potential loss in gross revenue to
these 191 entities cannot be evaluated given the lack of information on
potential gross revenue and profit from commercial fishing in general
and specifically for red grouper.
Profit estimates are not currently available for the 126 entities
with red grouper shares that participated in commercial fisheries other
than red grouper. However, since these vessels did not have any red
grouper landings, none of their gross revenue and thus none of their
profit were the result of red grouper harvests. Under the proposed
action to decrease the red grouper commercial quota, the average
allocation of red grouper in 2011 would be reduced by approximately 629
lb (286 kg). Using the 2008 average price of $2.85 per pound, this loss
in allocation could potentially represent an annual loss of nearly
$1,800 in gross revenue per entity. However, this potential loss in
gross revenue could only lead to a loss in profit if these entities
intend to become active in the red grouper component of the Gulf reef
fish fishery in 2011 and at a level above their reduced allocation.
Thus, for example, assuming these vessels intend to harvest red grouper
in 2011 at a level equivalent to their 2010 allocation, and this
harvest was in addition to, rather than in place of, their recent
commercial fishing activities, the reduction in allocation could lead
to a maximum loss of approximately three percent in gross revenue which
could in turn reduce profit. Alternatively, losses in gross revenue
could be due to these entities' inability to sell the allocations being
lost under the proposed action, though this possibility presumes that a
demand for the allocations exists.
Profit estimates are not currently available for the 498 entities
with red grouper shares that participated in the commercial red grouper
sector of the Gulf reef fish fishery in 2008 or 2009. Under the
proposed action to decrease the red grouper quota, these vessels' red
grouper allocations would be reduced by approximately 2,092 lb (951 kg)
on average. As these vessels have been harvesting at levels near their
2010 allocation in recent years on average, this reduction in red
grouper allocation is likely to lead to a future reduction in red
grouper landings and therefore gross revenue. Using the average 2008
price of $2.85 per pound, it is estimated that these vessels could lose
nearly $6,000, or approximately 9 percent, in average annual gross
revenue. A loss in gross revenue of this magnitude would likely lead to
a reduction in profit.
However, for the 49 vessels with red grouper shares that were
active in the red grouper component of the Gulf reef fish fishery and
also received a bottom longline endorsement in 2010, their allocation
of red grouper in 2011 would decrease by approximately 10,400 lb (4,727
kg) under the proposed action. For these particular vessels, the loss
in red grouper landings could range from zero to the full amount of the
decrease in allocation, though the latter is unlikely given new
regulations restricting the use of longline gear. Even if these vessels
intended to harvest red grouper in 2011 at levels comparable to 2008,
prior to the implementation of regulations restricting the use of
longline gear, they would only lose approximately 4,600 lb (2,091 kg)
in red grouper landings rather than the full amount of their reduced
allocation. This loss in landings is estimated to be valued at
approximately $13,000 in gross revenue, or 8 percent of their average
annual gross revenue. Such a loss in gross revenue would likely reduce
their profit. However, if they intend to harvest at levels comparable
to 2009, then their reduced allocation would still be above their
intended landings. Therefore, the reduction in allocation would not
lead to a reduction in landings from what they would have otherwise
been and thus gross revenue and profit would also not be reduced.
Two alternatives, including the status quo, were considered for the
action to reduce the red grouper commercial quota to 4.32 million lb
(1.96 million kg). The first alternative, the status quo, would have
maintained the red grouper commercial quota at the current level of
5.75 million lb (2.61 million kg). This alternative is not consistent
with the goals and objectives of the Council's plan to manage red
grouper to achieve the mandates of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Specifically, this alternative would be inconsistent with current
National Standard 1 guidance because the associated TAC of 7.57 million
lb (3.43 million kg) would be above the ABC of 6.31 million lb (2.86
million kg) recommended by the Council's SSC.
The second alternative would have would set the red grouper
commercial quota at 4.80 million lb (2.18 million kg). This amount is
equal to 85 percent
[[Page 63785]]
of the yield at FMSY, which the SSC considered sufficient to
reduce the probability that overfishing might occur in 2011. However,
this alternative is inconsistent with the method established by the
Council in Amendment 30B where the annual catch target would be based
on the yield associated with FOY.
One alternative, the status quo, was considered for the action to
require vessels with valid commercial Gulf reef fish permits to mark
their buoy gear with the official vessel number. The Council and NMFS
have determined that the current definition of buoy gear is ambiguous.
This ambiguity has led to problems with monitoring and enforcement of
buoy gear regulations and thus a clearer definition of this gear type
is being proposed. By not requiring the marking of buoy gear, this
alternative would not improve the monitoring and enforcement of buoy
gear regulations since law enforcement personnel would not be able to
determine which vessel deployed the gear if the gear is left
unattended.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection-of-information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that collection-of-
information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the PRA applicable to vessels in the Gulf reef fish fishery,
namely, a requirement to mark buoy gear with the official vessel number
(U.S. Coast Guard documentation number or State registration number).
This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval. The public
reporting burden for this collection-of-information is estimated to
average 20 minutes per buoy. This estimate of the public reporting
burden includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing the collection-of-information. Public comment is sought
regarding: Whether this proposed collection-of-information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of
the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of
the collection-of-information, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Send
comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of the
collection-of-information requirement, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS and to OMB (see ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 622.2, the definition of ``buoy gear'' is revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.2 Definitions and acronyms.
* * * * *
Buoy gear means fishing gear that fishes vertically in the water
column that consists of a single drop line suspended from a float, from
which no more than 10 hooks can be connected between the buoy and the
terminal end, and the terminal end contains a weight that is no more
than 10 lb (4.5 kg). The drop line can be rope (hemp, manila, cotton or
other natural fibers; nylon, polypropylene, spectra or other synthetic
material) or monofilament, but must not be cable or wire. The gear is
free-floating and not connected to other gear or the vessel. The drop
line must be no greater than 2 times the depth of the water being
fished. All hooks must be attached to the drop line no more than 30 ft
(9.1 m) from the weighted terminal end. These hooks may be attached
directly to the drop line; attached as snoods (defined as an offshoot
line that is directly spliced, tied or otherwise connected to the drop
line), where each snood has a single terminal hook; or as gangions
(defined as an offshoot line connected to the drop line with some type
of detachable clip), where each gangion has a single terminal hook.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 622.6, paragraph (b)(3) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.6 Vessel and gear identification.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Buoy gear. In the Gulf EEZ, if buoy gear is used or possessed,
each buoy must display the official number of the vessel.
4. In Sec. 622.42, the first sentence of the introductory text is
revised; paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(A) and (B) are removed; paragraphs
(a)(1)(iii)(A) and (C) are revised; and paragraphs (a)(1)(v) and
(a)(2)(ii) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.42 Quotas.
Quotas apply for the fishing year for each species or species
group, unless accountability measures are implemented during the
fishing year pursuant to Sec. 622.49, due to a quota overage occurring
the previous year, in which case a reduced quota will be specified
through notification in the Federal Register. * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) SWG combined--6.22 million lb (2.82 million kg).
* * * * *
(C) Red grouper--4.32 million lb (1.96 million kg).
* * * * *
(v) Greater amberjack--503,000 lb (228,157 kg), round weight.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Recreational quota for greater amberjack. The recreational
quota for greater amberjack is 1,368,000 lb (620,514 kg), round weight.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 622.49, the second sentence of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.49 Accountability measures.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * * In addition, if despite such closure, recreational
landings exceed the quota, the AA will file a notification with the
Office of the Federal Register, at or near the beginning of the
following fishing year, to reduce the quota for that following year by
the amount of the overage in the prior fishing year, and to reduce the
length of the recreational fishing season for the following fishing
year by the amount necessary to recover the overage from the prior
fishing year. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-26197 Filed 10-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P