Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for Industry on Planning for the Effects of High Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of Medically Necessary Drug Products, 63832-63833 [2010-26103]
Download as PDF
63832
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–D–0568]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry on Planning for the Effects of
High Absenteeism to Ensure
Availability of Medically Necessary
Drug Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by November
17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–NEW and
title Draft Guidance for Industry on
Planning for the Effects of High
Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of
Medically Necessary Drug Products
(MNPs). Also include the FDA docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400Q, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–7392,
Elizabeth.berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Planning for the Effects of High
Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of
Medically Necessary Drug Products
The draft guidance recommends that
manufacturers of drug and therapeutic
biological products and manufacturers
of raw materials and components used
in those products develop a written
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Emergency Plan (Plan) for maintaining
an adequate supply of MNPs during an
emergency that results in high employee
absenteeism. The draft guidance
discusses the issues that should be
covered by the Plan, such as: (1)
Identifying a person or position title (as
well as two designated alternates) with
the authority to activate and deactivate
the Plan and make decisions during the
emergency; (2) prioritizing the
manufacturer’s drug products based on
medical necessity; (3) identifying
actions that should be taken prior to an
anticipated period of high absenteeism;
(4) identifying criteria for activating the
Plan; (5) performing quality risk
assessments to determine which
manufacturing activities may be
reduced to enable the company to meet
a demand for MNPs; (6) returning to
normal operations and conducting a
post-execution assessment of the
execution outcomes; and (7) testing the
Plan. The draft guidance recommends
developing a Plan for each individual
manufacturing facility as well as a
broader Plan that addresses multiple
sites within the organization (for
purposes of this analysis, we consider
the Plan for an individual
manufacturing facility as well as the
broader Plan to comprise one Plan for
each manufacturer). Based on FDA’s
data on the number of manufacturers
that would be covered by the draft
guidance, we estimate that
approximately 70 manufacturers will
develop an Emergency Plan as
recommended by the draft guidance
(i.e., 1 Plan per manufacturer to include
all manufacturing facilities, sites, and
drug products), and that each Plan will
take approximately 500 hours to
develop, maintain, and update.
The draft guidance also encourages
manufacturers to include a procedure in
their Plan for notifying CDER when the
Plan is activated and when returning to
normal operations. The draft guidance
recommends that these notifications
occur within 1 day of a Plan’s activation
and within 1 day of a Plan’s
deactivation. The draft guidance
specifies the information that should be
included in these notifications, such as
which drug products will be
manufactured under altered procedures,
which products will have
manufacturing temporarily delayed, and
any anticipated or potential drug
shortages. We expect that approximately
two notifications (for purposes of this
analysis, we consider an activation and
a deactivation notification to equal one
notification) will be sent to CDER by
approximately two manufacturers each
year, and that each notification will take
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approximately 16 hours to prepare and
submit.
This draft guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
Under the draft guidance, if a
manufacturer obtains information after
releasing an MNP under its Plan leading
to suspicion that the product might be
defective, CDER should be contacted
immediately
(drugshortages@fda.hhs.gov) in
adherence to existing recall reporting
regulations (21 CFR 7.40) (OMB control
number 0910–0249) or defect reporting
requirements for drug application
products (21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)) and
therapeutic biological products
regulated by CDER (21 CFR 600.14)
(OMB control numbers 0910–0001 and
0910–0458, respectively).
The following collections of
information found in FDA current good
manufacturing practice (CGMP)
regulations in part 211 (21 CFR part
211) are approved under OMB control
number 0190–0139. The draft guidance
encourages manufacturers to maintain
records, in accordance with the CGMP
requirements (see, e.g., § 211.180), that
support decisions to carry out changes
to approved procedures for
manufacturing and release of products
under the Plan. The draft guidance
states: A Plan should be developed,
written, reviewed, and approved within
the site’s change control quality system
in accordance with the requirements in
§§ 211.100(a) and 211.160(a); execution
of the Plan should be documented in
accordance with the requirements
described in § 211.100(b); and standard
operating procedures should be
reviewed and revised or supplementary
procedures developed and approved to
enable execution of the Plan.
In the Federal Register of January 8,
2010 (75 FR 1060), FDA announced the
availability of the draft guidance. In that
Federal Register notice, FDA provided
the public with 60 days to comment on
the proposed collection of information.
FDA received the following comments
that pertained to the information
collection in the draft guidance.
Some comments stated that
pharmaceutical companies already have
business continuity plans that address
shortages of medically necessary
products and that these plans take into
account high absenteeism and other
factors that could affect production.
FDA believes that a general business
continuity plan is unlikely to take into
account individual products or how
execution of the plan would affect
product quality.
Some comments stated that the
recommendation that the Plan be
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
63833
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices
maintained in the Quality System is
burdensome and provides no value to
ensuring protection of public health.
FDA agrees with these comments and
has revised the guidance to recommend
that only the parts of the Plan that could
have an effect on product quality be
reviewed and approved by the Quality
Unit before implementation of the Plan.
One comment stated that with
adequate inventory on hand, an
absenteeism-specific business plan
might not be needed. FDA disagrees
with the comment. As we discussed in
the guidance, potential shortages could
arise from emergencies not
contemplated by inventory policy.
One comment stated that establishing
provisions to use resources available at
other sites will require significant effort.
FDA recommends that these provisions
be considered as part of the overall Plan
for handling emergencies.
Some comments suggested different
timeframes for notifying FDA of
activation and deactivation of the Plan,
stating that 1 day is too short a time.
FDA did not change its recommendation
for 1-day notification for Plan activation
and deactivation because informing
FDA of this activity in as close to real
time as possible will assist the FDA in
making critical decisions related to
managing the causal event.
Some comments stated that testing the
implementation of the Plan and
producing test batches would be
impractical and expensive. FDA agrees
with these comments and has revised its
recommendation to test the
implementation of the Plan and
removed its recommendation to produce
test batches of the drug product.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Annual
frequency
per response
Number of
respondents
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
Notify FDA of Plan activation and deactivation ...................
2
1
2
16
32
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
32
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
Annual
frequency per
recordkeeping
Develop initial Plan ..............................................................
70
1
70
500
35,000
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
35,000
1 There
Hours per
record
Total hours
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; the NIH–American
Association for Retired Persons
(AARP) Interactive Comprehensive
Lifestyle Interview by Computer Study
(iCLIC) (NCI)
In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Cancer Institute (NCI), the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) will
publish periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Oct 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Title: NIHAmerican Association for Retired
Persons (AARP) interactive
Comprehensive Lifestyle Interview by
Computer Study (iCLIC). Type of
Information Collection Request:
Extension. Need and Use of Information
Collection: The Nutritional
Epidemiology Branch of the Division of
Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of
the National Cancer Institute has
planned this study to evaluate the
feasibility of using these three new
computerized questionnaires as well as
the Diet and Health Questionnaire
(DHQ), a well-established food
frequency questionnaire in a population
of early-to-late-middle-aged men and
women. Participants will be asked to
complete computerized questionnaires
over a 90 day period, with some
questionnaires in a series being
completed twice. This evaluation study
comprises the necessary performance
and feasibility tests for the new
computerized questionnaires, which
will provide an opportunity to assess
the possibility of administering
computerized questionnaires in future
large prospective cohort studies. The
PROPOSED COLLECTION:
[FR Doc. 2010–26103 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Total annual
records
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
computerized questionnaires will
support the ongoing examination
between cancer and other health
outcomes with nutritional, physical
activity, and lifestyle exposures. The
computerized questionnaires adhere to
The Public Health Service Act, Section
412 (42 U.S.C. 285a–1) and Section 413
(42 U.S.C. 285a–2), which authorizes
the Division of Cancer Epidemiology
and Genetics of the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) to establish and support
programs for the detection, diagnosis,
prevention and treatment of cancer; and
to collect, identify, analyze and
disseminate information on cancer
research, diagnosis, prevention and
treatment. Frequency of Response:
Either 1 or 2 times. Affected Public:
Individuals. Type of Respondents: U.S.
adults (aged 50 and over). The annual
reporting burden is displayed in the
table below. The estimated total
annualized burden hours being
requested is 6886. The annualized cost
to respondents is estimated at $121,743.
There are no Capital Costs, Operating
Costs, and/or Maintenance Costs to
report.
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63832-63833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26103]
[[Page 63832]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0568]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry on Planning for the Effects of High Absenteeism to Ensure
Availability of Medically Necessary Drug Products
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
November 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-NEW and
title Draft Guidance for Industry on Planning for the Effects of High
Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of Medically Necessary Drug Products
(MNPs). Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400Q, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7392,
Elizabeth.berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Draft Guidance for Industry on Planning for the Effects of High
Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of Medically Necessary Drug Products
The draft guidance recommends that manufacturers of drug and
therapeutic biological products and manufacturers of raw materials and
components used in those products develop a written Emergency Plan
(Plan) for maintaining an adequate supply of MNPs during an emergency
that results in high employee absenteeism. The draft guidance discusses
the issues that should be covered by the Plan, such as: (1) Identifying
a person or position title (as well as two designated alternates) with
the authority to activate and deactivate the Plan and make decisions
during the emergency; (2) prioritizing the manufacturer's drug products
based on medical necessity; (3) identifying actions that should be
taken prior to an anticipated period of high absenteeism; (4)
identifying criteria for activating the Plan; (5) performing quality
risk assessments to determine which manufacturing activities may be
reduced to enable the company to meet a demand for MNPs; (6) returning
to normal operations and conducting a post-execution assessment of the
execution outcomes; and (7) testing the Plan. The draft guidance
recommends developing a Plan for each individual manufacturing facility
as well as a broader Plan that addresses multiple sites within the
organization (for purposes of this analysis, we consider the Plan for
an individual manufacturing facility as well as the broader Plan to
comprise one Plan for each manufacturer). Based on FDA's data on the
number of manufacturers that would be covered by the draft guidance, we
estimate that approximately 70 manufacturers will develop an Emergency
Plan as recommended by the draft guidance (i.e., 1 Plan per
manufacturer to include all manufacturing facilities, sites, and drug
products), and that each Plan will take approximately 500 hours to
develop, maintain, and update.
The draft guidance also encourages manufacturers to include a
procedure in their Plan for notifying CDER when the Plan is activated
and when returning to normal operations. The draft guidance recommends
that these notifications occur within 1 day of a Plan's activation and
within 1 day of a Plan's deactivation. The draft guidance specifies the
information that should be included in these notifications, such as
which drug products will be manufactured under altered procedures,
which products will have manufacturing temporarily delayed, and any
anticipated or potential drug shortages. We expect that approximately
two notifications (for purposes of this analysis, we consider an
activation and a deactivation notification to equal one notification)
will be sent to CDER by approximately two manufacturers each year, and
that each notification will take approximately 16 hours to prepare and
submit.
This draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA regulations. Under the draft guidance, if a
manufacturer obtains information after releasing an MNP under its Plan
leading to suspicion that the product might be defective, CDER should
be contacted immediately (drugshortages@fda.hhs.gov) in adherence to
existing recall reporting regulations (21 CFR 7.40) (OMB control number
0910-0249) or defect reporting requirements for drug application
products (21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)) and therapeutic biological products
regulated by CDER (21 CFR 600.14) (OMB control numbers 0910-0001 and
0910-0458, respectively).
The following collections of information found in FDA current good
manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations in part 211 (21 CFR part 211)
are approved under OMB control number 0190-0139. The draft guidance
encourages manufacturers to maintain records, in accordance with the
CGMP requirements (see, e.g., Sec. 211.180), that support decisions to
carry out changes to approved procedures for manufacturing and release
of products under the Plan. The draft guidance states: A Plan should be
developed, written, reviewed, and approved within the site's change
control quality system in accordance with the requirements in
Sec. Sec. 211.100(a) and 211.160(a); execution of the Plan should be
documented in accordance with the requirements described in Sec.
211.100(b); and standard operating procedures should be reviewed and
revised or supplementary procedures developed and approved to enable
execution of the Plan.
In the Federal Register of January 8, 2010 (75 FR 1060), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance. In that Federal
Register notice, FDA provided the public with 60 days to comment on the
proposed collection of information. FDA received the following comments
that pertained to the information collection in the draft guidance.
Some comments stated that pharmaceutical companies already have
business continuity plans that address shortages of medically necessary
products and that these plans take into account high absenteeism and
other factors that could affect production. FDA believes that a general
business continuity plan is unlikely to take into account individual
products or how execution of the plan would affect product quality.
Some comments stated that the recommendation that the Plan be
[[Page 63833]]
maintained in the Quality System is burdensome and provides no value to
ensuring protection of public health. FDA agrees with these comments
and has revised the guidance to recommend that only the parts of the
Plan that could have an effect on product quality be reviewed and
approved by the Quality Unit before implementation of the Plan.
One comment stated that with adequate inventory on hand, an
absenteeism-specific business plan might not be needed. FDA disagrees
with the comment. As we discussed in the guidance, potential shortages
could arise from emergencies not contemplated by inventory policy.
One comment stated that establishing provisions to use resources
available at other sites will require significant effort. FDA
recommends that these provisions be considered as part of the overall
Plan for handling emergencies.
Some comments suggested different timeframes for notifying FDA of
activation and deactivation of the Plan, stating that 1 day is too
short a time. FDA did not change its recommendation for 1-day
notification for Plan activation and deactivation because informing FDA
of this activity in as close to real time as possible will assist the
FDA in making critical decisions related to managing the causal event.
Some comments stated that testing the implementation of the Plan
and producing test batches would be impractical and expensive. FDA
agrees with these comments and has revised its recommendation to test
the implementation of the Plan and removed its recommendation to
produce test batches of the drug product.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
respondents response responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notify FDA of Plan activation 2 1 2 16 32
and deactivation...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Recordkeeping Burden 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeping records record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Develop initial Plan............ 70 1 70 500 35,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 35,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Dated: October 12, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-26103 Filed 10-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P