Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Sports Youth Visitor Program, 63247-63253 [2010-25883]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
Dated: October 6, 2010.
Ann Stock
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
Officer listed in the final assistance
award document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data
Requirements
[FR Doc. 2010–25881 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
Award recipients will be required to
maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the agreement or who
benefit from the award funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Program Officer
Karene Grad, U.S. Department of State,
Office of Academic Exchange Programs,
ECA/A/E/EUR, SA–5, Fourth Floor,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20037, tel. 202–632–3237,
GradKE@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
EUR–11–05.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7208]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Sports Youth Visitor
Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/SU–11–02
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 19.415
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: November 17,
2010
Executive Summary: The U.S.
Department of State’s Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
seeks an organization to assist the Office
of Citizen Exchanges in the
implementation of several short-term,
high-visibility sports exchanges taking
place during calendar year 2011 and
2012. Approximately 18 programs from
countries around the world will
participate in exchange initiatives/
projects in the United States designed to
promote interaction between the foreign
participants and their American peers.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The three overarching goals
for the exchange program are to help
foreign participants and their American
counterparts to: (1) Develop a broad
worldview that incorporates diverse
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63247
perspectives; (2) apply their skills
toward productive and positive outlets
in their local communities, and (3) build
upon their professional skills and
knowledge while developing a deeper
understanding of U.S. society and
culture. Through these projects, the
Sports Visitor Program provides
opportunities for foreign visitors to
participate in intensive sport exchanges
in the United States. The award
recipient must provide overall
programmatic, logistical, and
administrative support for each of the
18 programs.
The project will entail working with
ECA in planning and scheduling all
events, including:
• Oversight of arrivals and
departures;
• Preparing briefing materials;
• Locating and reserving athletic or
cultural facilities; scheduling meeting
rooms;
• Aiding in the recruitment of
appropriate speakers and/or other sports
figures;
• Designing and planning substantive
and well-organized activities;
• Coordinating escorts and
interpreters;
• Providing adult supervision for
minors;
• Arranging possible air travel
(domestic and, in some cases,
international) and local transportation.
The program will enable participants
to:
• Foster understanding and build
relationships with others from different
ethnic, religious, and national groups;
• Promote mutual understanding
between the people of the partner
countries and the United States;
• Learn more about U.S. society and
culture, thereby countering negative
stereotypes;
• Become part of a network of leaders
who will share their knowledge and
skills with their peers and the broader
community.
Applicant organizations should
identify their own specific objectives
and measurable outcomes based on
these program goals and the
specifications provided in this
solicitation.
Most programs will start and end in
Washington, DC. Other activities will
take place at other sites in the United
States. The exchange format will be
intensive and interactive, weaving
together both formal and informal
sessions to achieve the stated goals and
objectives. Applicants must present a
program plan that allows the
participants to thoroughly explore the
themes in a creative, memorable, and
practical way. Activities should be
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
63248
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
designed to be replicable and provide
practical knowledge and skills that the
participants can apply at home. Staff
from the selected organization will be
expected to be available and/or attend
all aspects of the visitor programs, when
appropriate and in coordination with
ECA.
The proposal must demonstrate how
these activities/objectives will be met.
The proposal narrative should also
provide detailed information on major
program activities, and applicants
should explain and justify their
programmatic choices. Programs must
comply with J–1 visa regulations. Please
refer to the complete Solicitation
Package — this RFGP, the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI), and the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) — for further
information.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Sports Visitor Program
The Sports Visitor Program will
consist of approximately 18 programs
with 12–25 participants per program.
For planning purposes, we anticipate a
total number of approximately 300
participants per the 18 programs;
however, final participant numbers will
be determined by the Program Officer
assigned to the program. Program
participants will be selected from all
world regions and will focus on a range
of sports from basketball to volleyball.
The Sports Visitors will be either
athletes between the ages of 14 and 17,
or adult coaches who will benefit both
from personal interaction with U.S.
professional athletes and coaches, and
from traveling to the United States to
take part in an introduction to U.S.
training approaches, sports management
techniques, or community-based sports
programs. The majority of the Sports
Visitors will be non-English language
speakers with little prior experience in
the United States. The final mix of
countries and sports will be determined
after discussions between ECA, Regional
Bureaus, and the U.S. Embassies
overseas, as well as input from the
relevant U.S. Sports Federations and
their foreign counterparts.
II. Award Information:
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement
Fiscal Year Funds: 2011
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,000,000
Approximate Number of Awards: One
Approximate Average Award:
$1,000,000
Anticipated Award Date: February 1,
2011, pending the availability of funds
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
February 29, 2012
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing it again.
The responsibilities of ECA regarding
this cooperative agreement are as
follows:
(1) Participation in the design and
direction of program activities;
(2) Approval and input on program
timelines and agendas;
(3) Guidance in execution of all
program components;
(4) Review and approval of all
program publicity and recruitment
materials;
(5) Approval of decisions related to
special circumstances or problems
throughout duration of program;
(6) Management of all SEVIS-related
issues;
(7) Assistance with participant
emergencies;
(8) Identification of exchange
participants with identified criteria for
formal selection process;
(9) Liaison with relevant U.S.
Embassies and country desk officers at
the U.S. Department of State.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making one award, in an
amount up to $1,000,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b.) Award recipients must have a
Washington, DC. presence. Applicants
who do not currently have a
Washington, DC presence must include
a detailed plan in their proposal for
establishing such a presence by January
1, 2011. The costs related to establishing
such a presence must be borne by the
award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in
this proposal. The award recipient must
have e-mail capability, access to Internet
resources, and the ability to exchange
data electronically with all partners
involved in the Sports Visitor Program.
(c.) Proposals must demonstrate that
an applicant has an established resource
base of programming contacts and the
ability to keep this resource base
continuously updated. This resource
base should include speakers, thematic
specialists, or practitioners in a wide
range of professional fields in both the
private and public sectors.
(d.) Technical Eligibility: In addition
to the requirements outlined in the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
technical format and instructions
document, all proposals must comply
with the following or they will result in
your proposal being declared
technically ineligible and given no
further consideration in the review
process.
The Office does not support proposals
limited to conferences or seminars (i.e.,
one- to fourteen-day programs with
plenary sessions, main speakers, panels,
and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small
part of a larger project in duration that
is receiving Bureau funding from this
competition.
No funding is available exclusively to
send U.S. citizens to conferences or
conference-type seminars overseas; nor
is funding available for bringing foreign
nationals to conferences or to routine
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
professional association meetings in the
United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does
not support academic research or
faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA–5, 3rd
Floor, SportsUnited, Department of
State, Washington, DC 20037, 202–632–
6436 phone; 202–632–9355 fax; or
email: DavisKX2@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/
C/SU–11–02 when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3.f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation. It
also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Kelli R. Davis and refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number:
ECA/PE/C/SU–11–02 located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all
applicants for ECA federal assistance awards
must include in their application the names
of directors and/or senior executives (current
officers, trustees, and key employees,
regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must
submit information in one of the following
ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit that has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63249
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all regulations
governing The J Visa. The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is the
official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an
employee of the Bureau will be the
‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the program
under the terms of 22 CFR part 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement)
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR part 62.
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et. seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
63250
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Designation, Private
Sector Programs Division, ECA/EC/D/
PS, SA–5, 5th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20037.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted in
the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ’Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
recipient organization will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
Department of State Acknowledgement
All recipients of ECA grants or
cooperative agreements should be
prepared to state in any announcement
or publicity where it is not
inappropriate that activities are assisted
financially by the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs of the U.S.
Department of State under the authority
of the Fulbright-Hays Act of 1961, as
amended. In any contact with the media
(print, television, web, etc.) applicants
must acknowledge the SportsUnited
Division of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs of the U.S.
Department of State funding for the
program.
IV.3d.4. For information on the
Bureau’s policies regarding alumni
outreach and engagement, as well as
guidance on the proper
acknowledgement of ECA sponsorship
of this program, please refer to the
enclosed PSI.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The award request may not
exceed $1,000,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local,
and in some cases, international,
transportation);
3. Orientations;
4. Cultural and social activities;
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging,
7. Interpreters and translation, when
necessary;
8. Follow-on activities;
9. Evaluation;
10. Stipends or allowances;
11. Other justifiable expenses directly
related to supporting program activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: November
17, 2010
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/SU–
11–02
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/PE/C/SU–11–02, SA–5, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word/Excel
format on a PC-formatted disk.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday—Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, Email:
support@grants.gov
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63251
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards cooperative agreements resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning: Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
63252
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan
should adhere to the program overview
and guidelines described above.
Program schedules should reflect
innovative and relevant itineraries, and
creative and dynamic meetings and site
visits.
2. Ability to Achieve Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Your
proposal should clearly demonstrate
how your organization will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: The
proposed program should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding,
including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of longterm institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
Applicants should refer to the Bureau’s
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy
Guidelines in the PSI and the Diversity,
Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
section, Item IV.3d.2, above for
additional guidance.
5. Project Evaluation: Your proposal
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that the
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique, plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives.
6. Institution’s Record/Ability/
Institutional Capacity: Your proposal
should demonstrate an institutional
record of successful international
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by the Bureau’s Grants
Office. The Bureau will consider the
past performance of prior recipients and
the demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project goals.
7. Cost-effectiveness: The applicant
should demonstrate efficient use of
Bureau funds. Overhead and
administrative costs in the proposal
budget, including salaries, honoraria
and subcontracts for services, should be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
kept to a minimum. Proposals whose
administrative costs are less than
twenty-five (25) per cent of the total
funds requested from the Bureau will be
deemed more competitive under this
criterion. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices. Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. The successful applicant
will receive a Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project: A
critical component of current U.S.
government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact Kelli R. Davis,
telephone number 202–632–6436, e-mail
DavisKX2@state.gov for additional
information.
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact:
Kelli R. Davis, telephone number 202–632–
6436, e-mail DavisKX2@state.gov for
additional information.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following: Office of
Management and Budget Circular A–
122, ‘‘Cost Principles for Nonprofit
Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
(1.) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2.) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements. A SF–
PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress Report’’
Cover
(3.) Quarterly program and financial
reports are required that provide concise
information on all programs completed
that quarter as well as a description of
planning undertaken for programs
taking place in the following quarter.
Financial reports should describe
funding allocated to each program
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Notices
completed as well as an estimated
budget for programs to be undertaken in
the next quarter. A SF–PPR,
‘‘Performance Progress Report’’ Cover
Sheet is required with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Kelli R. Davis,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, Office of
SportsUnited ECA/PE/C/SU, Room 3–
G09, ECA/PE/C/SU–11–02, U.S.
Department of State, SA–5, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037,
telephone number: 202–632–6436, email DavisKX2@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number: ECA/PE/C/
SU–11–02.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
Dated: October 6, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–25883 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
[Public Notice 7210]
State-56, Network User Account
Records
Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State proposes to
create a system of records, Network User
Account Records, State-56, pursuant to
the provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a) and
Office of Management and Budget
Circular No. A–130, Appendix I. The
Department’s report was filed with the
Office of Management and Budget on
August 16, 2010.
It is proposed that the new system
will be named ‘‘Network User Account
Records.’’ It is also proposed that the
new system description will be utilized
to administer network user accounts; to
help document and/or control access to
computer systems, platforms, services,
applications, and databases within a
Department network; to monitor
security of computer systems; to
investigate and make referrals for
disciplinary or other actions if
unauthorized access or inappropriate
usage is suspected or detected; and to
identify the need for training programs.
Any persons interested in
commenting on the new system of
records may do so by submitting
comments in writing to Margaret P.
Grafeld, Director, Office of Information
Programs and Services, A/GIS/IPS,
Department of State, SA–2, 515 22nd
Street, Washington, DC 20522–8001.
This system of records will be effective
40 days from the date of publication,
unless we receive comments that will
result in a contrary determination.
The new system description,
‘‘Network User Account Records, State56,’’ will read as set forth below.
SUMMARY:
Dated: August 16, 2010.
Steven J. Rodriguez,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Operations,
Bureau of Administration, U.S. Department
of State.
Records are maintained by the
Department of State in secure facilities
wherever a domain controller is
automatically compiling a visitors’ log
of individuals who authenticate to a
particular server.
Department of State employees and
other organizational users who have
access to Department of State computer
networks.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
This Privacy Act system consists of
the network user account records that
Department information systems,
applications, and services compile and
maintain about users of a network.
These records include user data such as
the user’s name, system-assigned
username; e-mail address; employee or
other user identification number;
organization code; job title; business
affiliation; work contact information;
systems, applications, or services to
which the individual has access;
systems, applications, or services used;
dates, times, and durations of use; user
profile; and IP address of access. The
records also include system usage files
and directories when they contain
information about specific users.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
5 U.S.C. 301; 44 U.S.C. 3544.
PURPOSE:
To administer network user accounts;
to help document and/or control access
to computer systems, platforms,
services, applications, and databases
within a Department network; to
monitor security of computer systems;
to investigate and make referrals for
disciplinary or other actions if
unauthorized access or inappropriate
usage is suspected or detected; and to
identify the need for training programs.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
The routine uses applicable to this
system of records are published at 73 FR
40650–40651 (July 15, 2008).
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
STORAGE:
Electronic and paper records.
STATE–56
RETRIEVABILITY:
SYSTEM NAME:
Network User Account Records.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
Unclassified.
Frm 00113
SYSTEM LOCATION:
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
PO 00000
63253
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Records are indexed by the user’s
name, system-assigned username; e-mail
address; or other searchable data fields
or codes.
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63247-63253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7208]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Sports Youth Visitor Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: November 17, 2010
Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) seeks an organization to assist
the Office of Citizen Exchanges in the implementation of several short-
term, high-visibility sports exchanges taking place during calendar
year 2011 and 2012. Approximately 18 programs from countries around the
world will participate in exchange initiatives/projects in the United
States designed to promote interaction between the foreign participants
and their American peers.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The three overarching goals for the exchange program are
to help foreign participants and their American counterparts to: (1)
Develop a broad worldview that incorporates diverse perspectives; (2)
apply their skills toward productive and positive outlets in their
local communities, and (3) build upon their professional skills and
knowledge while developing a deeper understanding of U.S. society and
culture. Through these projects, the Sports Visitor Program provides
opportunities for foreign visitors to participate in intensive sport
exchanges in the United States. The award recipient must provide
overall programmatic, logistical, and administrative support for each
of the 18 programs.
The project will entail working with ECA in planning and scheduling
all events, including:
Oversight of arrivals and departures;
Preparing briefing materials;
Locating and reserving athletic or cultural facilities;
scheduling meeting rooms;
Aiding in the recruitment of appropriate speakers and/or
other sports figures;
Designing and planning substantive and well-organized
activities;
Coordinating escorts and interpreters;
Providing adult supervision for minors;
Arranging possible air travel (domestic and, in some
cases, international) and local transportation.
The program will enable participants to:
Foster understanding and build relationships with others
from different ethnic, religious, and national groups;
Promote mutual understanding between the people of the
partner countries and the United States;
Learn more about U.S. society and culture, thereby
countering negative stereotypes;
Become part of a network of leaders who will share their
knowledge and skills with their peers and the broader community.
Applicant organizations should identify their own specific
objectives and measurable outcomes based on these program goals and the
specifications provided in this solicitation.
Most programs will start and end in Washington, DC. Other
activities will take place at other sites in the United States. The
exchange format will be intensive and interactive, weaving together
both formal and informal sessions to achieve the stated goals and
objectives. Applicants must present a program plan that allows the
participants to thoroughly explore the themes in a creative, memorable,
and practical way. Activities should be
[[Page 63248]]
designed to be replicable and provide practical knowledge and skills
that the participants can apply at home. Staff from the selected
organization will be expected to be available and/or attend all aspects
of the visitor programs, when appropriate and in coordination with ECA.
The proposal must demonstrate how these activities/objectives will
be met. The proposal narrative should also provide detailed information
on major program activities, and applicants should explain and justify
their programmatic choices. Programs must comply with J-1 visa
regulations. Please refer to the complete Solicitation Package -- this
RFGP, the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI), and the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) -- for further information.
Sports Visitor Program
The Sports Visitor Program will consist of approximately 18
programs with 12-25 participants per program. For planning purposes, we
anticipate a total number of approximately 300 participants per the 18
programs; however, final participant numbers will be determined by the
Program Officer assigned to the program. Program participants will be
selected from all world regions and will focus on a range of sports
from basketball to volleyball. The Sports Visitors will be either
athletes between the ages of 14 and 17, or adult coaches who will
benefit both from personal interaction with U.S. professional athletes
and coaches, and from traveling to the United States to take part in an
introduction to U.S. training approaches, sports management techniques,
or community-based sports programs. The majority of the Sports Visitors
will be non-English language speakers with little prior experience in
the United States. The final mix of countries and sports will be
determined after discussions between ECA, Regional Bureaus, and the
U.S. Embassies overseas, as well as input from the relevant U.S. Sports
Federations and their foreign counterparts.
II. Award Information:
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement
Fiscal Year Funds: 2011
Approximate Total Funding: $1,000,000
Approximate Number of Awards: One
Approximate Average Award: $1,000,000
Anticipated Award Date: February 1, 2011, pending the availability
of funds
Anticipated Project Completion Date: February 29, 2012
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this cooperative agreement for two additional
fiscal years, before openly competing it again.
The responsibilities of ECA regarding this cooperative agreement
are as follows:
(1) Participation in the design and direction of program
activities;
(2) Approval and input on program timelines and agendas;
(3) Guidance in execution of all program components;
(4) Review and approval of all program publicity and recruitment
materials;
(5) Approval of decisions related to special circumstances or
problems throughout duration of program;
(6) Management of all SEVIS-related issues;
(7) Assistance with participant emergencies;
(8) Identification of exchange participants with identified
criteria for formal selection process;
(9) Liaison with relevant U.S. Embassies and country desk officers
at the U.S. Department of State.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award,
in an amount up to $1,000,000 to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Award recipients must have a Washington, DC. presence.
Applicants who do not currently have a Washington, DC presence must
include a detailed plan in their proposal for establishing such a
presence by January 1, 2011. The costs related to establishing such a
presence must be borne by the award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in this proposal. The award recipient
must have e-mail capability, access to Internet resources, and the
ability to exchange data electronically with all partners involved in
the Sports Visitor Program.
(c.) Proposals must demonstrate that an applicant has an
established resource base of programming contacts and the ability to
keep this resource base continuously updated. This resource base should
include speakers, thematic specialists, or practitioners in a wide
range of professional fields in both the private and public sectors.
(d.) Technical Eligibility: In addition to the requirements
outlined in the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) technical format
and instructions document, all proposals must comply with the following
or they will result in your proposal being declared technically
ineligible and given no further consideration in the review process.
The Office does not support proposals limited to conferences or
seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen-day programs with plenary sessions,
main speakers, panels, and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small part of a larger project in
duration that is receiving Bureau funding from this competition.
No funding is available exclusively to send U.S. citizens to
conferences or conference-type seminars overseas; nor is funding
available for bringing foreign nationals to conferences or to routine
[[Page 63249]]
professional association meetings in the United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does not support academic research
or faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA-5,
3rd Floor, SportsUnited, Department of State, Washington, DC 20037,
202-632-6436 phone; 202-632-9355 fax; or email: DavisKX2@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02 when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3.f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also
contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific information, award criteria and
budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Kelli R. Davis and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02 located at the top of this announcement on
all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for ECA
federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation).
In fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information
in one of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit that has not received a
grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if
your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all regulations governing The J Visa. The
Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered
by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the ``Responsible
Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, which
covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving
awards (either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will
be third parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the
conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the
sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau
expects that any organization receiving an award under this competition
will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully
comply with 22 CFR part 62 et. seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.,
including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
[[Page 63250]]
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Designation, Private Sector Programs Division, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA-5,
5th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the 'Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106--113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
Department of State Acknowledgement
All recipients of ECA grants or cooperative agreements should be
prepared to state in any announcement or publicity where it is not
inappropriate that activities are assisted financially by the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State under
the authority of the Fulbright-Hays Act of 1961, as amended. In any
contact with the media (print, television, web, etc.) applicants must
acknowledge the SportsUnited Division of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State funding for the
program.
IV.3d.4. For information on the Bureau's policies regarding alumni
outreach and engagement, as well as guidance on the proper
acknowledgement of ECA sponsorship of this program, please refer to the
enclosed PSI.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The award request may not exceed $1,000,000. There must
be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local, and in some cases,
international, transportation);
3. Orientations;
4. Cultural and social activities;
[[Page 63251]]
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging,
7. Interpreters and translation, when necessary;
8. Follow-on activities;
9. Evaluation;
10. Stipends or allowances;
11. Other justifiable expenses directly related to supporting
program activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: November 17, 2010
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/
PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02, SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word/Excel format on a PC-
formatted disk.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the `Get Started' portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday--Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time,
Email: grants.gov">support@grants.gov
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should
[[Page 63252]]
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described
above. Program schedules should reflect innovative and relevant
itineraries, and creative and dynamic meetings and site visits.
2. Ability to Achieve Program Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Your proposal should clearly
demonstrate how your organization will meet the program's objectives
and plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: The proposed program should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities). Applicants should refer to the Bureau's
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines in the PSI and the
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines section, Item IV.3d.2,
above for additional guidance.
5. Project Evaluation: Your proposal should include a plan to
evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that the proposal include
a draft survey questionnaire or other technique, plus a description of
a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives.
6. Institution's Record/Ability/Institutional Capacity: Your
proposal should demonstrate an institutional record of successful
international exchange programs, including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants as determined by the Bureau's Grants Office. The Bureau
will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve
the program or project goals.
7. Cost-effectiveness: The applicant should demonstrate efficient
use of Bureau funds. Overhead and administrative costs in the proposal
budget, including salaries, honoraria and subcontracts for services,
should be kept to a minimum. Proposals whose administrative costs are
less than twenty-five (25) per cent of the total funds requested from
the Bureau will be deemed more competitive under this criterion. All
other items should be necessary and appropriate.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices. Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. The successful applicant will receive a Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall
be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
A critical component of current U.S. government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices. The State Department has made
the awarding of grants for this purpose a key component of its Iran
policy. As a condition of licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224; and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing conditions
mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct
this vetting the Department will collect information from grantees and
sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of their key
employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran
complies with requirements, please contact Kelli R. Davis, telephone
number 202-632-6436, e-mail DavisKX2@state.gov for additional
information.
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact:
Kelli R. Davis, telephone number 202-632-6436, e-mail
DavisKX2@state.gov for additional information.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122,
``Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
(1.) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days
after the expiration of the award;
(2.) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements. A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover
(3.) Quarterly program and financial reports are required that
provide concise information on all programs completed that quarter as
well as a description of planning undertaken for programs taking place
in the following quarter. Financial reports should describe funding
allocated to each program
[[Page 63253]]
completed as well as an estimated budget for programs to be undertaken
in the next quarter. A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover
Sheet is required with all program reports.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Kelli R. Davis,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, Office of SportsUnited ECA/PE/C/SU, Room
3-G09, ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02, U.S. Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, telephone number: 202-632-6436, e-
mail DavisKX2@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number: ECA/PE/C/SU-11-02.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 6, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-25883 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P