RIN 1018-AW77, 63088-63093 [2010-25816]
Download as PDF
63088
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves a fireworks display that is not
expected to result in any significant
adverse environmental impact as
described in NEPA.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
and from 4:15 p.m. to 6 p.m., local time,
on October 16, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lower Mississippi
River or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Lower Mississippi River or a
designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF–FM channels 16 or
by telephone at (901) 521–4822.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Lower Mississippi
River and designated personnel.
Designated personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port, Lower Mississippi
River will inform the public when safety
zones have been established via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: September 16, 2010.
Michael Gardiner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lower Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2010–25804 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2009–0052;
70101–1261–0000L6]
2. A new temporary § 165.T08–0873 is
added to read as follows:
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska, Subpart B;
Special Actions
■
§ 165.T08–0873 Great Mississippi Balloon
Race and Fireworks Safety Zone; the
Mississippi River, extending from mile
marker 363 to mile marker 365.5, in the
vicinity of Natchez, MS.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: those waters of the Lower
Mississippi River, beginning at mile
marker 363 and ending at mile marker
365.5, extending the entire width of the
river.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 7:15 p.m. to 8:45
p.m., local time, on October 15, 2010
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1018–AW77
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
regulations that manage the taking of
wildlife and fish in Alaska for
subsistence purposes. In particular, the
Federal Subsistence Board’s (Board)
process of accepting and addressing
special action requests is clarified, along
with the role of the Regional Advisory
Councils in the special action process.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Public notice requirements are updated
to bring them in alignment with the
practices of the digital age and
accommodate the new biennial
regulatory cycle.
DATES: This rule is effective October 14,
2010.
The Board meeting
transcripts are available for review at
the Office of Subsistence Management,
1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121,
Anchorage, AK 99503, or on the Office
of Subsistence Management Web site
(https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/index.cfml).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786–
3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Steve Kessler,
Regional Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region;
(907) 743–9461 or skessler@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program
(Program). This Program grants a
preference for subsistence uses of fish
and wildlife resources on Federal public
lands and waters in Alaska. The
Secretaries first published regulations to
carry out this Program in the Federal
Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940).
These regulations have subsequently
been amended several times. Because
this Program is a joint effort between
Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):
Title 36, ‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public
Property,’’ and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and
Fisheries,’’ at 36 CFR 242.1–28 and 50
CFR 100.1–28, respectively. The
regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; subpart
B, Program Structure; subpart C, Board
Determinations; and subpart D,
Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these
regulations, the Secretaries established a
Federal Subsistence Board to administer
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The Board is made up of:
• A Chair appointed by the Secretary
of the Interior with concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
National Park Service;
• The Alaska State Director, U.S.
Bureau of Land Management;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and
• The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S.
Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies
participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C,
which set forth the basic program, and
the subpart D regulations, which, among
other things, set forth specific harvest
seasons and limits.
In administration of the Program,
Alaska is divided into 10 subsistence
resource regions, each of which is
represented by a Regional Advisory
Council. The Regional Advisory
Councils provide a forum for rural
residents with personal knowledge of
local conditions and resources to have
a meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on
Federal public lands in Alaska. The
Regional Advisory Council members
represent diverse geographical, cultural,
and user interests within each region.
Members of the regional councils,
agency representatives, and the public
expressed concern to the Federal
Subsistence Board that 36 CFR 242.19
and 50 CFR 100.19, respectively, needed
to be revised in a manner that provided
more clarity to the Board’s process of
accepting and addressing special action
requests. Special actions are actions that
the Board takes to modify the take of
fish and wildlife regulations on public
lands, outside of the regulatory proposal
period, to ensure the continued viability
of a fish or wildlife population or for
other reasons. These actions may
include closing, opening, or adjusting
the seasons; modifying the harvest
limits; or modifying the methods and
means of harvest for subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife.
The problem with the lack of clarity
in the regulations became particularly
apparent during oral argument in the
case of Ninilchik Traditional Council v.
Fleagle, when the presiding judge
struggled to interpret the procedural
mechanisms described in the regulation
and criticized it for being unclear. More
recently, we recognized the need to
modify § __.19 to accommodate the
programmatic shift to a biennial
regulatory cycle.
Current Rule
The Secretaries published a proposed
rule on October 14, 2009 (74 FR 52712),
to amend subpart B, §§ __.10, __.18, and
__.19 of 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR 100.
These modifications will:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63089
(1) Improve clarity with respect to the
Board’s process of accepting and
addressing special action requests;
(2) Update public notice requirements
and bring them into line with the
practices of the digital age;
(3) Bring clarity to the role of the
regional councils with respect to special
action requests; and
(4) Accommodate the biennial
regulatory cycle, which was
implemented in 2008 (73 FR 35726;
June 24, 2008).
These regulatory revisions will result
in no direct change to subsistence uses
or fish and wildlife populations, but
clarify the process by which special
action requests are accepted or rejected
by the Board. The proposed rule opened
a comment period, which closed on
January 12, 2010. The Departments
advertised the proposed rule by mail,
radio, and newspaper.
The Secretaries, through the Board,
held a public meeting on January 12,
2010, to receive comments from
Regional Advisory Council Chairs, or
designated representatives, and the
public. The Board met again on April
13, 2010, to review and formulate a
recommendation to the Secretaries.
Public Review and Comment
During the public comment period,
the Secretaries received two comments,
one from a State advisory commission
and a second from a private
organization. At the public meeting on
January 12, 2010, the Secretaries,
through the Board, received four
comments, two from two separate
sporting organizations, one from a
Native organization, and one from the
State. In addition, the Regional
Advisory Council Chairs were provided
the opportunity to comment to the
Board. The major comments from all
sources are addressed below:
Comment: The proposed rule wrongly
expands the authority of the Board
under ANILCA into regulating
nonsubsistence uses on Federal public
lands thereby infringing on sovereign
State authority.
Response: The Secretaries hold the
position that they have the authority to
open, close, restrict, or modify
nonsubsistence uses, as needed, in the
taking of fish and wildlife on Federal
public lands. Due to possible
misinterpretation, the Secretaries
decided to remove the phrase ‘‘* * * or
otherwise modify the requirements
regarding the taking of fish and wildlife
on public lands for nonsubsistence
uses.’’ from the language presented in
the proposed rule.
Comment: The proposed rule needs to
address specific conditions for
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
63090
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
reopening an area for nonsubsistence
use.
Response: Under direction from the
Secretaries, the Board adopted a policy
on closures to hunting, trapping and
fishing on Federal public lands and
waters in Alaska on August 29, 2007.
This policy addresses in detail the
removal of closures on Federal public
lands and waters and was approved by
the Secretaries prior to being adopted by
the Board.
Comment: The proposed rule does not
provide deference to the Regional
Advisory Councils in consideration of
special actions.
Response: The Secretaries address the
Board’s deference to the Regional
Advisory Councils in 36 CFR 242.10(e)
and 50 CFR 100.10(e), ‘‘Federal
Subsistence Board; ‘‘Relationship to
Regional Councils’’. It is further
addressed in the Board’s closure policy
of August 29, 2007.
Comment: The proposed rule does not
clarify the State’s role in regard to
Federal determinations that affect the
State’s management responsibilities for
fish and wildlife when implementing
special actions.
Response: The relationship between
the Board and the State is defined in 36
CFR 242.14 and 50 CFR 100.14,
‘‘Relationship to State procedures and
regulations’’. In addition, the
Memorandum of Understanding signed
on December 5, 2008, between the
Board and the State established
guidelines to coordinate the
management of subsistence uses of fish
and wildlife resources on Federal public
lands and waters in Alaska.
These final regulations reflect
Secretarial review and consideration of
the Federal Subsistence Board
recommendation and Regional Advisory
Council and public comments. The
public received extensive opportunity to
review and comment on all changes.
Analysis and justification for the
action taken are available for review at
the Office of Subsistence Management,
1011 East Tudor Road, Mail Stop 121,
Anchorage, Alaska 99503, or on the
Office of Subsistence Management Web
site (https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/
index.cfml).
Conformance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
Administrative Procedure Act
Compliance
The Secretaries have provided
extensive opportunity for public input
and involvement in compliance with
Administrative Procedure Act
requirements, including publishing a
proposed rule notice in the Federal
Register, participation in multiple
Regional Council meetings, additional
public review and comment on
proposed regulatory changes, and
opportunity for additional public
comment during the Board meeting
prior to their recommendation to the
Secretaries.
Therefore, the Secretaries finds good
cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to
make this rule effective upon the date
set forth in DATES to ensure continued
operation of the subsistence program.
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for developing a
Federal Subsistence Management
Program was distributed for public
comment on October 7, 1991. That
document described the major issues
associated with Federal subsistence
management as identified through
public meetings, written comments, and
staff analyses and examined the
environmental consequences of four
alternatives. Proposed regulations
(subparts A, B, and C) that would
implement the preferred alternative
were included in the DEIS as an
appendix. The DEIS and the proposed
administrative regulations presented a
framework for a regulatory cycle
regarding subsistence hunting and
fishing regulations (subpart D). The
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) was published on February 28,
1992.
Based on the public comments
received, the analysis contained in the
FEIS, and the recommendations of the
Federal Subsistence Board and the
Department of the Interior’s Subsistence
Policy Group, the Secretary of the
Interior, with the concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture, through the
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest
Service, implemented Alternative IV as
identified in the DEIS and FEIS (Record
of Decision on Subsistence Management
for Federal Public Lands in Alaska
(ROD), signed April 6, 1992). The DEIS
and the selected alternative in the FEIS
defined the administrative framework of
a regulatory cycle for subsistence
hunting and fishing regulations. The
final rule for subsistence management
regulations for public lands in Alaska,
subparts A, B, and C, implemented the
Federal Subsistence Management
Program and included a framework for
a regulatory cycle for the subsistence
taking of wildlife and fish. The
following Federal Register documents
pertain to this rulemaking:
SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN ALASKA, SUBPARTS A, B, AND C: FEDERAL REGISTER
DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE FINAL RULE
Date of publication
Category
Details
57 FR 22940 ..........
May 29, 1992 ........
Final rule ...............
64 FR 1276 ............
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register
citation
January 8, 1999 ....
Final rule ...............
66 FR 31533 ..........
June 12, 2001 .......
Interim rule ............
‘‘Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska; Final Rule’’
was published in the Federal Register.
Amended the regulations to include subsistence activities occurring on inland
navigable waters in which the United States has a reserved water right and
to identify specific Federal land units where reserved water rights exist. Extended the Federal Subsistence Board’s management to all Federal lands
selected under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and the Alaska
Statehood Act and situated within the boundaries of a Conservation System
Unit, National Recreation Area, National Conservation Area, or any new national forest or forest addition, until conveyed to the State of Alaska or to an
Alaska Native Corporation. Specified and clarified the Secretaries’ authority
to determine when hunting, fishing, or trapping activities taking place in
Alaska off the public lands interfere with the subsistence priority.
Expanded the authority that the Board may delegate to agency field officials
and clarified the procedures for enacting emergency or temporary restrictions, closures, or openings.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
63091
SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN ALASKA, SUBPARTS A, B, AND C: FEDERAL REGISTER
DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE FINAL RULE—Continued
Federal Register
citation
Date of publication
Category
Details
67 FR 30559 ..........
May 7, 2002 ..........
Final rule ...............
68 FR 7703 ............
February 18, 2003
Direct final rule ......
68 FR 23035 ..........
April 30, 2003 ........
69 FR 60957 ..........
October 14, 2004 ..
Affirmation of direct
final rule.
Final rule ...............
70 FR 76400 ..........
Final rule ...............
71 FR 49997 ..........
December 27,
2005.
August 24, 2006 ....
72 FR 25688 ..........
May 7, 2007 ..........
Final rule ...............
Amended the operating regulations in response to comments on the June 12,
2001, interim rule. Also corrected some inadvertent errors and oversights of
previous rules.
Clarified how old a person must be to receive certain subsistence use permits
and removed the requirement that Regional Councils must have an odd
number of members.
Because no adverse comments were received on the direct final rule (68 FR
7703), the direct final rule was adopted.
Clarified the membership qualifications for Regional Advisory Council membership and relocated the definition of ‘‘regulatory year’’ from subpart A to subpart D of the regulations.
Revised jurisdiction in marine waters and clarified jurisdiction relative to military lands.
Revised the jurisdiction of the subsistence program by adding submerged
lands and waters in the area of Makhnati Island, near Sitka, AK. This allowed subsistence users to harvest marine resources in this area under
seasons, harvest limits, and methods specified in the regulations.
Revised nonrural determinations.
Final rule ...............
An environmental assessment was
prepared in 1997 on the expansion of
Federal jurisdiction over fisheries and is
available from the office listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
Secretary of the Interior with the
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture determined that the
expansion of Federal jurisdiction did
not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process on
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The intent of all Federal
subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on
public lands a priority over the taking
of fish and wildlife on such lands for
other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and
wildlife populations. The final section
810 analysis determination appeared in
the April 6, 1992, ROD and concluded
that the Federal Subsistence
Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process
for setting subsistence regulations, may
have some local impacts on subsistence
uses, but will not likely restrict
subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental
assessment process for extending
fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of
the effects of this rule was conducted in
accordance with section 810. That
evaluation also supported the
Secretaries’ determination that the rule
will not reach the ‘‘may significantly
restrict’’ threshold that would require
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
notice and hearings under ANILCA
section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This rule does
not contain any new collections of
information that require OMB approval.
OMB has reviewed and approved the
following collections of information
associated with the subsistence
regulations at 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR
100: Subsistence hunting and fishing
applications, permits, and reports,
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council Membership Application/
Nomination and Interview Forms (OMB
Control No. 1018–0075 expires January
31, 2013).
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant and has not reviewed
this rule under Executive Order 12866.
OMB bases its determination upon the
following four criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
(b) Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this
rule are already being harvested and
consumed by the local harvester and do
not result in an additional dollar benefit
to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are
harvested by subsistence users annually
and, if given an estimated dollar value
of $3.00 per pound, this amount would
equate to about $6 million in food value
statewide. Based upon the amounts and
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
63092
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
nonsubsistence uses or close public
lands to the take of fish and wildlife for
nonsubsistence uses when necessary for
the conservation of healthy populations
of fish or wildlife, to continue
subsistence uses of fish or wildlife, or
for reasons of public safety or
administration. The Board may also
reopen public lands to nonsubsistence
uses if new information or changed
conditions indicate that the closure is
no longer warranted;
(vii) Restrict the taking of a particular
fish or wildlife population on public
lands for subsistence uses, close public
lands to the take of fish and wildlife for
subsistence uses, or otherwise modify
the requirements for take from a
particular fish or wildlife population on
public lands for subsistence uses when
necessary to ensure the continued
viability of a fish or wildlife population,
or for reasons of public safety or
administration. As soon as conditions
warrant, the Board may also reopen
public lands to the taking of a fish and
wildlife population for subsistence
users to continue those uses;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise the introductory text of
paragraph (a) of § __.18 to read as
follows:
50 CFR Part 100
§ __.18
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
■ For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board amends subpart B of part 242 of
title 36 and part 100 of title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth
below.
(a) The Board will accept proposals
for changes to the Federal subsistence
regulations in subparts C or D of this
part according to a published schedule,
except for proposals for emergency and
temporary special actions, which the
Board will accept according to
procedures set forth in § __.19. The
Board may establish a rotating schedule
for accepting proposals on various
sections of subpart C or subpart D
regulations over a period of years. The
Board will develop and publish
proposed regulations in the Federal
Register, publish notice in local
newspapers, and distribute comments
on the proposed regulations in the form
of proposals for public review.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise § __.19 to read as follows:
Drafting Information
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or
tribal governments.
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service;
• Dr. Glenn Chen and Patricia
Petrivelli, Alaska Regional Office,
Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; and
• Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Forest Service.
Executive Order 12988
List of Subjects
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
regarding civil justice reform.
36 CFR Part 242
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State
from exercising subsistence
management authority over fish and
wildlife resources on Federal lands
unless it meets certain requirements.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. However, the Secretaries have
elected to provide tribes an opportunity
to consult on this rule. The Secretaries,
through the Board, provided a variety of
opportunities for consultation through:
proposing changes to the existing rule;
commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the
Regional Advisory Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board’s
meetings; and providing input in
person, by mail, email, or phone at any
time during the rulemaking process.
PART __—SUBSISTENCE
MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR
PUBLIC LANDS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for both 36
CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd,
3101–3126; 18 U.S.C. 3551–3586; 43 U.S.C.
1733.
2. Amend § __.10 by revising
paragraph (d)(4)(vi), redesignating
paragraphs (d)(4)(vii) through (d)(4)(xix)
as paragraphs (d)(4)(viii) through
(d)(4)(xx), and adding a new paragraph
(d)(4)(vii) to read as follows:
■
Executive Order 13211
§ __.10
This Executive Order requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O.
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
Federal Subsistence Board.
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(vi) Restrict the taking of fish and
wildlife on public lands for
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ __.19
Regulation adoption process.
Special actions.
(a) Emergency special actions. In an
emergency situation, if necessary to
ensure the continued viability of a fish
or wildlife population, to continue
subsistence uses of fish or wildlife, or
for public safety reasons, the Board may
immediately open or close public lands
for the taking of fish and wildlife for
subsistence uses, or modify the
requirements for take for subsistence
uses, or close public lands to take for
nonsubsistence uses of fish and wildlife,
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
or restrict the requirements for take for
nonsubsistence uses.
(1) If the timing of a regularly
scheduled meeting of the affected
Regional Council so permits without
incurring undue delay, the Board may
seek Council recommendations on the
proposed emergency special action.
Such a Council recommendation, if any,
will be subject to the requirements of
§ __.18(a)(4).
(2) The emergency action will be
effective when directed by the Board,
may not exceed 60 days, and may not
be extended unless the procedures for
adoption of a temporary special action,
as set forth in paragraph (b) of this
section, have been followed.
(b) Temporary special actions. After
adequate notice and public hearing, the
Board may temporarily close or open
public lands for the taking of fish and
wildlife for subsistence uses, or modify
the requirements for subsistence take, or
close public lands for the taking of fish
and wildlife for nonsubsistence uses, or
restrict take for nonsubsistence uses.
(1) The Board may make such
temporary changes only after it
determines that the proposed temporary
change will not interfere with the
conservation of healthy fish and wildlife
populations, will not be detrimental to
the long-term subsistence use of fish or
wildlife resources, and is not an
unnecessary restriction on
nonsubsistence users. The Board may
also reopen public lands to
nonsubsistence uses if new information
or changed conditions indicate that the
closure is no longer warranted.
(i) Prior to implementing a temporary
special action, the Board will consult
with the State of Alaska and the Chairs
of the Regional Councils of the affected
regions.
(ii) If the timing of a regularly
scheduled meeting of the affected
Regional Council so permits without
incurring undue delay, the Board will
seek Council recommendations on the
proposed temporary special action.
Such Council recommendations, if any,
will be subject to the requirements of
§ __.18(a)(4).
(2) The length of any temporary action
will be confined to the minimum time
period or harvest limit determined by
the Board to be necessary under the
circumstances. In any event, a
temporary opening or closure will not
extend longer than the end of the
current regulatory cycle.
(c) The Board may reject a request for
either an emergency or a temporary
special action if the Board concludes
that there are no time-sensitive
circumstances necessitating a regulatory
change before the next regular proposal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
cycle. However, a special action request
that has been rejected for this reason
may be deferred, if appropriate and after
consultation with the proponent, for
consideration during the next regular
proposal cycle. The Board will consider
changes to customary and traditional
use determinations in subpart C of this
part only during the regular proposal
cycle.
(d) The Board will provide notice of
all regulatory changes adopted via
special action by posting the change on
the Office of Subsistence Management
Web site (https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/
index.cfml). When appropriate, notice
may also include distribution of press
releases to newspapers, local radio
stations, and local contacts, as well as
direct notification to the proponent and
interested parties. The Board will
publish notice and reasons justifying the
special action in the Federal Register as
soon as practicable.
(e) The decision of the Board on any
proposed special action will constitute
its final administrative action.
(f) Regulations authorizing any
individual agency to implement
closures or restrictions on public lands
managed by the agency remain
unaffected by the regulations in this
part.
(g) Fish and wildlife may not be taken
in violation of any restriction, closure,
or change authorized by the Board.
Dated: July 13, 2010.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior, Department of the
Interior.
Beth G. Pendleton,
Regional Forester, USDA—Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25816 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 112
[EPA–HQ–OPA–2009–0880; FRL–9213–8]
RIN 2050–AG59
Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill
Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule—
Compliance Date Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency)
is promulgating a new compliance date
of November 10, 2011 by which certain
facilities must prepare or amend their
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63093
Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, and
implement those Plans, providing an
additional year for certain facilities.
This action allows additional time for
those affected in the regulated
community to understand the revisions
to the SPCC rule finalized in December
2008 and November 2009. However,
EPA is not extending the compliance
date for drilling, production or
workover facilities that are offshore or
that have an offshore component, or for
onshore facilities required to have and
submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs).
Additionally, the Agency is delaying the
compliance date by which facilities
must address milk and milk product
containers, associated piping and
appurtenances that are constructed
according to the current applicable 3–A
Sanitary Standards, and subject to the
current applicable Grade ‘‘A’’
Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) or a
State dairy regulatory requirement
equivalent to the current applicable
PMO. The date by which the owner or
operator of a facility must comply with
the SPCC requirements for these milk
and milk product containers is delayed
one year from the effective date of a
final rule specifically addressing these
milk and milk product containers,
associated piping and appurtenances, or
as specified by a rule that otherwise
establishes a compliance date for these
facilities. Both the extension and delay
of the compliance date provide time for
certain facilities to undertake the
actions necessary to prepare or amend
their SPCC Plans, as well as implement
them.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The public docket for this
rulemaking, Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OPA–2009–0880, contains the
information related to this rulemaking,
including the response to comment
document. All documents in the docket
are listed in the index at https://
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in
the index, some information may not be
publicly available, such as Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63088-63093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25816]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS-R7-SM-2009-0052; 70101-1261-0000L6]
RIN 1018-AW77
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska,
Subpart B; Special Actions
AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the regulations that manage the taking
of wildlife and fish in Alaska for subsistence purposes. In particular,
the Federal Subsistence Board's (Board) process of accepting and
addressing special action requests is clarified, along with the role of
the Regional Advisory Councils in the special action process.
[[Page 63089]]
Public notice requirements are updated to bring them in alignment with
the practices of the digital age and accommodate the new biennial
regulatory cycle.
DATES: This rule is effective October 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The Board meeting transcripts are available for review at
the Office of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121,
Anchorage, AK 99503, or on the Office of Subsistence Management Web
site (https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/index.cfml).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786-3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest System lands, contact Steve
Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA, Forest Service,
Alaska Region; (907) 743-9461 or skessler@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), the Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) jointly implement the
Federal Subsistence Management Program (Program). This Program grants a
preference for subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on
Federal public lands and waters in Alaska. The Secretaries first
published regulations to carry out this Program in the Federal Register
on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). These regulations have subsequently been
amended several times. Because this Program is a joint effort between
Interior and Agriculture, these regulations are located in two titles
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 36, ``Parks, Forests,
and Public Property,'' and Title 50, ``Wildlife and Fisheries,'' at 36
CFR 242.1-28 and 50 CFR 100.1-28, respectively. The regulations contain
subparts as follows: Subpart A, General Provisions; subpart B, Program
Structure; subpart C, Board Determinations; and subpart D, Subsistence
Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these regulations, the Secretaries
established a Federal Subsistence Board to administer the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. The Board is made up of:
A Chair appointed by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. National Park Service;
The Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian
Affairs; and
The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C, which set forth the basic
program, and the subpart D regulations, which, among other things, set
forth specific harvest seasons and limits.
In administration of the Program, Alaska is divided into 10
subsistence resource regions, each of which is represented by a
Regional Advisory Council. The Regional Advisory Councils provide a
forum for rural residents with personal knowledge of local conditions
and resources to have a meaningful role in the subsistence management
of fish and wildlife on Federal public lands in Alaska. The Regional
Advisory Council members represent diverse geographical, cultural, and
user interests within each region.
Members of the regional councils, agency representatives, and the
public expressed concern to the Federal Subsistence Board that 36 CFR
242.19 and 50 CFR 100.19, respectively, needed to be revised in a
manner that provided more clarity to the Board's process of accepting
and addressing special action requests. Special actions are actions
that the Board takes to modify the take of fish and wildlife
regulations on public lands, outside of the regulatory proposal period,
to ensure the continued viability of a fish or wildlife population or
for other reasons. These actions may include closing, opening, or
adjusting the seasons; modifying the harvest limits; or modifying the
methods and means of harvest for subsistence uses of fish and wildlife.
The problem with the lack of clarity in the regulations became
particularly apparent during oral argument in the case of Ninilchik
Traditional Council v. Fleagle, when the presiding judge struggled to
interpret the procedural mechanisms described in the regulation and
criticized it for being unclear. More recently, we recognized the need
to modify Sec. ----.19 to accommodate the programmatic shift to a
biennial regulatory cycle.
Current Rule
The Secretaries published a proposed rule on October 14, 2009 (74
FR 52712), to amend subpart B, Sec. Sec. ----.10, ----.18, and ----.19
of 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR 100.
These modifications will:
(1) Improve clarity with respect to the Board's process of
accepting and addressing special action requests;
(2) Update public notice requirements and bring them into line with
the practices of the digital age;
(3) Bring clarity to the role of the regional councils with respect
to special action requests; and
(4) Accommodate the biennial regulatory cycle, which was
implemented in 2008 (73 FR 35726; June 24, 2008).
These regulatory revisions will result in no direct change to
subsistence uses or fish and wildlife populations, but clarify the
process by which special action requests are accepted or rejected by
the Board. The proposed rule opened a comment period, which closed on
January 12, 2010. The Departments advertised the proposed rule by mail,
radio, and newspaper.
The Secretaries, through the Board, held a public meeting on
January 12, 2010, to receive comments from Regional Advisory Council
Chairs, or designated representatives, and the public. The Board met
again on April 13, 2010, to review and formulate a recommendation to
the Secretaries.
Public Review and Comment
During the public comment period, the Secretaries received two
comments, one from a State advisory commission and a second from a
private organization. At the public meeting on January 12, 2010, the
Secretaries, through the Board, received four comments, two from two
separate sporting organizations, one from a Native organization, and
one from the State. In addition, the Regional Advisory Council Chairs
were provided the opportunity to comment to the Board. The major
comments from all sources are addressed below:
Comment: The proposed rule wrongly expands the authority of the
Board under ANILCA into regulating nonsubsistence uses on Federal
public lands thereby infringing on sovereign State authority.
Response: The Secretaries hold the position that they have the
authority to open, close, restrict, or modify nonsubsistence uses, as
needed, in the taking of fish and wildlife on Federal public lands. Due
to possible misinterpretation, the Secretaries decided to remove the
phrase ``* * * or otherwise modify the requirements regarding the
taking of fish and wildlife on public lands for nonsubsistence uses.''
from the language presented in the proposed rule.
Comment: The proposed rule needs to address specific conditions for
[[Page 63090]]
reopening an area for nonsubsistence use.
Response: Under direction from the Secretaries, the Board adopted a
policy on closures to hunting, trapping and fishing on Federal public
lands and waters in Alaska on August 29, 2007. This policy addresses in
detail the removal of closures on Federal public lands and waters and
was approved by the Secretaries prior to being adopted by the Board.
Comment: The proposed rule does not provide deference to the
Regional Advisory Councils in consideration of special actions.
Response: The Secretaries address the Board's deference to the
Regional Advisory Councils in 36 CFR 242.10(e) and 50 CFR 100.10(e),
``Federal Subsistence Board; ``Relationship to Regional Councils''. It
is further addressed in the Board's closure policy of August 29, 2007.
Comment: The proposed rule does not clarify the State's role in
regard to Federal determinations that affect the State's management
responsibilities for fish and wildlife when implementing special
actions.
Response: The relationship between the Board and the State is
defined in 36 CFR 242.14 and 50 CFR 100.14, ``Relationship to State
procedures and regulations''. In addition, the Memorandum of
Understanding signed on December 5, 2008, between the Board and the
State established guidelines to coordinate the management of
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on Federal public lands
and waters in Alaska.
These final regulations reflect Secretarial review and
consideration of the Federal Subsistence Board recommendation and
Regional Advisory Council and public comments. The public received
extensive opportunity to review and comment on all changes.
Analysis and justification for the action taken are available for
review at the Office of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road,
Mail Stop 121, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, or on the Office of Subsistence
Management Web site (https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/index.cfml).
Conformance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
Administrative Procedure Act Compliance
The Secretaries have provided extensive opportunity for public
input and involvement in compliance with Administrative Procedure Act
requirements, including publishing a proposed rule notice in the
Federal Register, participation in multiple Regional Council meetings,
additional public review and comment on proposed regulatory changes,
and opportunity for additional public comment during the Board meeting
prior to their recommendation to the Secretaries.
Therefore, the Secretaries finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) to make this rule effective upon the date set forth in DATES
to ensure continued operation of the subsistence program.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for developing a
Federal Subsistence Management Program was distributed for public
comment on October 7, 1991. That document described the major issues
associated with Federal subsistence management as identified through
public meetings, written comments, and staff analyses and examined the
environmental consequences of four alternatives. Proposed regulations
(subparts A, B, and C) that would implement the preferred alternative
were included in the DEIS as an appendix. The DEIS and the proposed
administrative regulations presented a framework for a regulatory cycle
regarding subsistence hunting and fishing regulations (subpart D). The
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on February
28, 1992.
Based on the public comments received, the analysis contained in
the FEIS, and the recommendations of the Federal Subsistence Board and
the Department of the Interior's Subsistence Policy Group, the
Secretary of the Interior, with the concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture, through the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service,
implemented Alternative IV as identified in the DEIS and FEIS (Record
of Decision on Subsistence Management for Federal Public Lands in
Alaska (ROD), signed April 6, 1992). The DEIS and the selected
alternative in the FEIS defined the administrative framework of a
regulatory cycle for subsistence hunting and fishing regulations. The
final rule for subsistence management regulations for public lands in
Alaska, subparts A, B, and C, implemented the Federal Subsistence
Management Program and included a framework for a regulatory cycle for
the subsistence taking of wildlife and fish. The following Federal
Register documents pertain to this rulemaking:
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska, Subparts A, B, and C: Federal Register Documents
Pertaining to the Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register citation Date of publication Category Details
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
57 FR 22940........................ May 29, 1992.......... Final rule............ ``Subsistence Management
Regulations for Public
Lands in Alaska; Final
Rule'' was published in
the Federal Register.
64 FR 1276......................... January 8, 1999....... Final rule............ Amended the regulations to
include subsistence
activities occurring on
inland navigable waters in
which the United States
has a reserved water right
and to identify specific
Federal land units where
reserved water rights
exist. Extended the
Federal Subsistence
Board's management to all
Federal lands selected
under the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act and
the Alaska Statehood Act
and situated within the
boundaries of a
Conservation System Unit,
National Recreation Area,
National Conservation
Area, or any new national
forest or forest addition,
until conveyed to the
State of Alaska or to an
Alaska Native Corporation.
Specified and clarified
the Secretaries' authority
to determine when hunting,
fishing, or trapping
activities taking place in
Alaska off the public
lands interfere with the
subsistence priority.
66 FR 31533........................ June 12, 2001......... Interim rule.......... Expanded the authority that
the Board may delegate to
agency field officials and
clarified the procedures
for enacting emergency or
temporary restrictions,
closures, or openings.
[[Page 63091]]
67 FR 30559........................ May 7, 2002........... Final rule............ Amended the operating
regulations in response to
comments on the June 12,
2001, interim rule. Also
corrected some inadvertent
errors and oversights of
previous rules.
68 FR 7703......................... February 18, 2003..... Direct final rule..... Clarified how old a person
must be to receive certain
subsistence use permits
and removed the
requirement that Regional
Councils must have an odd
number of members.
68 FR 23035........................ April 30, 2003........ Affirmation of direct Because no adverse comments
final rule. were received on the
direct final rule (68 FR
7703), the direct final
rule was adopted.
69 FR 60957........................ October 14, 2004...... Final rule............ Clarified the membership
qualifications for
Regional Advisory Council
membership and relocated
the definition of
``regulatory year'' from
subpart A to subpart D of
the regulations.
70 FR 76400........................ December 27, 2005..... Final rule............ Revised jurisdiction in
marine waters and
clarified jurisdiction
relative to military
lands.
71 FR 49997........................ August 24, 2006....... Final rule............ Revised the jurisdiction of
the subsistence program by
adding submerged lands and
waters in the area of
Makhnati Island, near
Sitka, AK. This allowed
subsistence users to
harvest marine resources
in this area under
seasons, harvest limits,
and methods specified in
the regulations.
72 FR 25688........................ May 7, 2007........... Final rule............ Revised nonrural
determinations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An environmental assessment was prepared in 1997 on the expansion
of Federal jurisdiction over fisheries and is available from the office
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Secretary of the
Interior with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture
determined that the expansion of Federal jurisdiction did not
constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process on the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The intent of
all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over the taking of fish
and wildlife on such lands for other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife populations. The final
section 810 analysis determination appeared in the April 6, 1992, ROD
and concluded that the Federal Subsistence Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental assessment process for
extending fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of the effects of this
rule was conducted in accordance with section 810. That evaluation also
supported the Secretaries' determination that the rule will not reach
the ``may significantly restrict'' threshold that would require notice
and hearings under ANILCA section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This rule
does not contain any new collections of information that require OMB
approval. OMB has reviewed and approved the following collections of
information associated with the subsistence regulations at 36 CFR 242
and 50 CFR 100: Subsistence hunting and fishing applications, permits,
and reports, Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council Membership
Application/Nomination and Interview Forms (OMB Control No. 1018-0075
expires January 31, 2013).
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not significant and has not reviewed this rule under Executive
Order 12866. OMB bases its determination upon the following four
criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government.
(b) Whether the rule will create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their
recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, which
include small businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions.
In general, the resources to be harvested under this rule are already
being harvested and consumed by the local harvester and do not result
in an additional dollar benefit to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are harvested by subsistence users
annually and, if given an estimated dollar value of $3.00 per pound,
this amount would equate to about $6 million in food value statewide.
Based upon the amounts and values cited above, the Departments certify
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
[[Page 63092]]
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence priority on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and certify pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that these regulations meet the
applicable standards provided in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State from
exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not
specifically provide rights to tribes for the subsistence taking of
wildlife, fish, and shellfish. However, the Secretaries have elected to
provide tribes an opportunity to consult on this rule. The Secretaries,
through the Board, provided a variety of opportunities for consultation
through: proposing changes to the existing rule; commenting on proposed
changes to the existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the Regional
Advisory Council meetings; engaging in dialogue at the Board's
meetings; and providing input in person, by mail, email, or phone at
any time during the rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. However, this rule is
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 13211, affecting energy
supply, distribution, or use, and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Additional assistance was provided by
Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management;
Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy Swanton, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
Dr. Glenn Chen and Patricia Petrivelli, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska Regional Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; and
Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Forest
Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Subsistence Board
amends subpart B of part 242 of title 36 and part 100 of title 50 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below.
PART ------SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN
ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for both 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd, 3101-3126; 18 U.S.C.
3551-3586; 43 U.S.C. 1733.
0
2. Amend Sec. ----.10 by revising paragraph (d)(4)(vi), redesignating
paragraphs (d)(4)(vii) through (d)(4)(xix) as paragraphs (d)(4)(viii)
through (d)(4)(xx), and adding a new paragraph (d)(4)(vii) to read as
follows:
Sec. ----.10 Federal Subsistence Board.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(vi) Restrict the taking of fish and wildlife on public lands for
nonsubsistence uses or close public lands to the take of fish and
wildlife for nonsubsistence uses when necessary for the conservation of
healthy populations of fish or wildlife, to continue subsistence uses
of fish or wildlife, or for reasons of public safety or administration.
The Board may also reopen public lands to nonsubsistence uses if new
information or changed conditions indicate that the closure is no
longer warranted;
(vii) Restrict the taking of a particular fish or wildlife
population on public lands for subsistence uses, close public lands to
the take of fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, or otherwise modify
the requirements for take from a particular fish or wildlife population
on public lands for subsistence uses when necessary to ensure the
continued viability of a fish or wildlife population, or for reasons of
public safety or administration. As soon as conditions warrant, the
Board may also reopen public lands to the taking of a fish and wildlife
population for subsistence users to continue those uses;
* * * * *
0
3. Revise the introductory text of paragraph (a) of Sec. ----.18 to
read as follows:
Sec. ----.18 Regulation adoption process.
(a) The Board will accept proposals for changes to the Federal
subsistence regulations in subparts C or D of this part according to a
published schedule, except for proposals for emergency and temporary
special actions, which the Board will accept according to procedures
set forth in Sec. ----.19. The Board may establish a rotating schedule
for accepting proposals on various sections of subpart C or subpart D
regulations over a period of years. The Board will develop and publish
proposed regulations in the Federal Register, publish notice in local
newspapers, and distribute comments on the proposed regulations in the
form of proposals for public review.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. ----.19 to read as follows:
Sec. ----.19 Special actions.
(a) Emergency special actions. In an emergency situation, if
necessary to ensure the continued viability of a fish or wildlife
population, to continue subsistence uses of fish or wildlife, or for
public safety reasons, the Board may immediately open or close public
lands for the taking of fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, or
modify the requirements for take for subsistence uses, or close public
lands to take for nonsubsistence uses of fish and wildlife,
[[Page 63093]]
or restrict the requirements for take for nonsubsistence uses.
(1) If the timing of a regularly scheduled meeting of the affected
Regional Council so permits without incurring undue delay, the Board
may seek Council recommendations on the proposed emergency special
action. Such a Council recommendation, if any, will be subject to the
requirements of Sec. ----.18(a)(4).
(2) The emergency action will be effective when directed by the
Board, may not exceed 60 days, and may not be extended unless the
procedures for adoption of a temporary special action, as set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section, have been followed.
(b) Temporary special actions. After adequate notice and public
hearing, the Board may temporarily close or open public lands for the
taking of fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, or modify the
requirements for subsistence take, or close public lands for the taking
of fish and wildlife for nonsubsistence uses, or restrict take for
nonsubsistence uses.
(1) The Board may make such temporary changes only after it
determines that the proposed temporary change will not interfere with
the conservation of healthy fish and wildlife populations, will not be
detrimental to the long-term subsistence use of fish or wildlife
resources, and is not an unnecessary restriction on nonsubsistence
users. The Board may also reopen public lands to nonsubsistence uses if
new information or changed conditions indicate that the closure is no
longer warranted.
(i) Prior to implementing a temporary special action, the Board
will consult with the State of Alaska and the Chairs of the Regional
Councils of the affected regions.
(ii) If the timing of a regularly scheduled meeting of the affected
Regional Council so permits without incurring undue delay, the Board
will seek Council recommendations on the proposed temporary special
action. Such Council recommendations, if any, will be subject to the
requirements of Sec. ----.18(a)(4).
(2) The length of any temporary action will be confined to the
minimum time period or harvest limit determined by the Board to be
necessary under the circumstances. In any event, a temporary opening or
closure will not extend longer than the end of the current regulatory
cycle.
(c) The Board may reject a request for either an emergency or a
temporary special action if the Board concludes that there are no time-
sensitive circumstances necessitating a regulatory change before the
next regular proposal cycle. However, a special action request that has
been rejected for this reason may be deferred, if appropriate and after
consultation with the proponent, for consideration during the next
regular proposal cycle. The Board will consider changes to customary
and traditional use determinations in subpart C of this part only
during the regular proposal cycle.
(d) The Board will provide notice of all regulatory changes adopted
via special action by posting the change on the Office of Subsistence
Management Web site (https://alaska.fws.gov/asm/index.cfml). When
appropriate, notice may also include distribution of press releases to
newspapers, local radio stations, and local contacts, as well as direct
notification to the proponent and interested parties. The Board will
publish notice and reasons justifying the special action in the Federal
Register as soon as practicable.
(e) The decision of the Board on any proposed special action will
constitute its final administrative action.
(f) Regulations authorizing any individual agency to implement
closures or restrictions on public lands managed by the agency remain
unaffected by the regulations in this part.
(g) Fish and wildlife may not be taken in violation of any
restriction, closure, or change authorized by the Board.
Dated: July 13, 2010.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior.
Beth G. Pendleton,
Regional Forester, USDA--Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-25816 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P