Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes, 63045-63048 [2010-25469]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
63045
TABLE 2—FOKKER CREDIT SERVICE BULLETINS
Fokker Service Bulletins
Revision
Fokker Performa Service Bulletin SBF100–32–127, including Appendix XIV, dated February 1,
2006.
Fokker Performa Service Bulletin SBF100–32–127, including Appendix XIV, dated February 1,
2006.
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32–156 ...........................................................................................
Original .........................
July 20, 2001.
1 ....................................
March 6, 2009.
Original .........................
March 6, 2009.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009–0176,
dated August 6, 2009; and Fokker Service
Bulletin SBF100–32–156, Revision 1, dated
June 29, 2009; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Fokker Service Bulletin
SBF100–32–156, Revision 1, dated June 29,
2009, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150
AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands;
telephone +31 (0)252–627–350; fax +31
(0)252–627–211; e-mail technicalservices.
fokkerservices@stork.com; Internet https://
www.myfokkerfleetcom.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.
html.
Date
* * * [F]uel leaks and failed fasteners
[have been reported] in the region of the rear
spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib
2. * * *
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0642; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–332–AD; Amendment
39–16470; AD 2010–21–10]
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion
failures in the region of the rear spar
root joint attachment fitting at wing rib
2, which could lead to reduced
structural integrity of the wing, and
consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 18, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of November 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 2120–AA64
Discussion
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Model BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38058).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
British Aerospace originally issued Service
Bulletin (SB) 57–033 in 1989 to detect fuel
leaks and failed fasteners in the region of the
rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing
rib 2. Accomplishment of this SB was
mandated by the [Civil Aviation Authority]
CAA United Kingdom AD 044–09–89.
Revisions 1 through 7 of this SB were
introduced to inspect pre mod HCM01447A
standard installations for fuel leaks and loose
or broken bolts. Modification HCM01447A
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25449 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
63046
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
introduced tension bolts in the attachment
fitting instead of the previous Hi-Lok bolts.
Revision 8 of the SB introduced inspection
instructions for post modification
HCM01447A installations because fuel tank
leaks and failed fasteners have subsequently
been found on aircraft post modification
HCM01447A. Inspections of the post-mod
HCM01447A standard are required to
maintain the structural integrity of the wing.
BAE Systems has now published SB 57–033
Revision 9 that specifies additional, calendartime based, inspection criteria to control the
stress corrosion failures of the pre and post
modification HCM01447A installations.
EASA AD 2007–0270 supersedes CAA UK
AD 044–09–89 and requires the
accomplishment of inspections and
corrective actions, as necessary, in
accordance with BAE Systems SB 57–033
Revision 9.
This [EASA] AD [2007–0270 R1] is revised
to clarify that the calendar compliance times
are to be counted from the effective date, not
from the SB issue date.
• Confirming that the hole edge
radius on the forward face of the rear
spar complies with the specifications in
Table 4 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.57–033, Revision 9,
dated October 10, 2006.
Corrective actions include either
replacing the bolt, or repairing the
defect in accordance with approved
repair data from BAE Systems. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion
failures in the region of the rear spar
root joint attachment fitting at wing rib
2, which could lead to reduced
structural integrity of the wing, and
consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane. Required actions include a
general inspection to identify the type of
bolt and nut at each location, external
inspections of the bolt installation of the
fuel tanks, related investigative actions,
and corrective actions, as applicable.
The general inspection includes
identifying the type of bolt and nut at
each location.
External inspections of the bolt
installation include:
• Visually inspecting for proper nut
installation, nut seating, and fuel
seepage.
• Checking for gaps between the
fitting and wing structure.
• Checking the nuts with a suitable
torque spanner to the specifications in
the torque figures shown in Table 2. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of
BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin
ISB.57–033, Revision 9, dated October
10, 2006, if Hi-Loks are installed, and
• Doing either an ultrasonic
inspection for damaged bolts or torque
check of the tension bolts.
Related investigative actions include:
• Inspecting the condition of the
sealant at and around all rear spar root
joint attachment bolts.
• Checking the bolt for damage or
evidence of the nut being tightened to
the end of the thread.
• Examining the wear pattern on the
seating surfaces of the bolt and nut to
determine if the bolt and nut have been
evenly seated on the structure.
• Visually inspecting the bolt hole
and surrounding area for damage, and
We have revised the applicability of
the existing AD to identify model
designations as published in the most
recent type certificate data sheet for the
affected models.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Explanation of Change to Applicability
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 1
product of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 3 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $255.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–21–10 BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED: Amendment
39–16470. Docket No. FAA–2010–0642;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–332–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective November 18, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model BAe 146–
100A, –200A, and –300A airplanes, and
Model Avro 146–RJ70A, 146–RJ85A, and
146–RJ100A airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
* * * [F]uel leaks and failed fasteners
[have been reported] in the region of the rear
spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib
2. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion
failures in the region of the rear spar root
joint attachment fitting at wing rib 2, which
could lead to reduced structural integrity of
the wing, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) At the applicable time in paragraph
(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, do a general visual
inspection to identify the type of bolt and nut
at each location, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(1) For airplanes on which neither
Modification HCM01447A nor repair
information leaflet (RIL) HC536H9156 (at any
location) has been done as of the effective
date of this AD, the compliance time for the
inspection is at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD, or within 2 years after the
last inspection done in accordance with BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
whichever occurs later, without exceeding
4,000 flight cycles after the last inspection.
(ii) Within 250 flight cycles or 3 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which either
Modification HCM01447A or RIL
HC536H9156 (at any location) has been done
as of the effective date of this AD, the
compliance time for the inspection is at the
latest of the times specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), and (g)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total
flight cycles.
(ii) Within 4,000 flight cycles after all bolts
are inspected and replaced in accordance
with BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–
033.
(iii) Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD.
(h) At the applicable time in paragraph
(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, do detailed
inspections of the bolt installation for proper
nut installation, nut seating, and fuel
seepage; a detailed inspection for gaps
between the fitting and wing structure; if HiLoks are installed, measure the torque of the
nuts to determine the specifications in the
torque figures shown in Table 2. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006; and
either an ultrasonic inspection for damaged
bolts or a torque measurement of the tension
bolts to determine the specifications in the
torque figures shown in Table 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006. Do all
63047
actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(i) If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, any defect (e.g.,
evidence of fuel seepage, damaged bolts or
low bolt torque, loose or rotating nuts,
suspect integrity of the bolt/nut assembly, or
gaps between the fitting and wing structure)
is found, before further flight, do the actions
specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), (i)(3),
(i)(4), and (i)(5) of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(1) Do a detailed inspection of the sealant
for cracks at and around all rear spar root
joint attachment bolts.
(2) Do a detailed inspection of the bolt for
damage or evidence of the nut being
tightened to the end of the thread.
(3) Do a detailed inspection of the wear
pattern on the seating surfaces of the bolt and
nut to determine if the bolt and nut have
been evenly seated on the structure.
(4) Do a detailed inspection of the bolt hole
and surrounding area for damage.
(5) Do a detailed inspection to determine
that the hole edge radius on the forward face
of the rear spar meets the dimensions
specified in Table 4 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.57–033, Revision 9, dated
October 10, 2006.
(j) If during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, any defects
(e.g., evidence of fuel seepage, damaged bolts
or low bolt torque, loose or rotating nuts,
suspect integrity of the bolt/nut assembly,
gaps between the fitting and wing structure,
cracked sealant, bolt damage or evidence of
the nut being tightened to the end of the
thread, uneven seating of the bolt and nut,
bolt hole and surrounding area damage, or
hole edge radius out of dimensions specified
in Table 4 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.57–033, Revision 9, dated
October 10, 2006), is found, before further
flight, do all applicable correction actions,
which include either replacing the bolt or
repairing the defect, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(k) Repeat the inspections in paragraph (h)
of this AD thereafter, at the applicable time
specified in Table 1 of this AD, for each
individual location.
TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR REPEAT INSPECTIONS
If the location has—
Then repeat the inspection—
A Hi-Lok bolt .............................................................................................
Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months, whichever occurs earlier, after
doing the last inspection.
Within 8,000 flight cycles or 48 months, whichever occurs earlier, after
doing the last inspection.
A tension bolt that was not replaced during the inspections in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD and no defects were found.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
63048
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR REPEAT INSPECTIONS—Continued
If the location has—
Then repeat the inspection—
A tension bolt that was replaced as required by paragraph (j) of this AD
Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months, whichever occurs earlier after
doing the replacement.
Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months, whichever occurs earlier after
doing the repair specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
A tension bolt that was not replaced and any defects were repaired as
required by paragraph (j) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006, allows
additional time to rectify the defect for the
corrective action depending on the condition,
this AD requires rectifying the defect before
further flight.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Other FAA AD Provisions
(l) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Todd Thompson,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(m) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2007–
0270 R1, dated November 7, 2007; and BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57–033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006; for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.57–033, Revision 9, dated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
October 10, 2006; to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED, Customer
Information Department, Prestwick
International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW,
Scotland, United Kingdom; telephone +44
1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; e-mail
RApublications@baesystems.com; Internet
https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/
RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25469 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0754 Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–039–AD; Amendment
39–16475; AD 2010–21–15]
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found that certain regions of the
elevators, elevators trim tabs, and ailerons do
not present drain holes to avoid water
accumulation inside of these flight control
surfaces. Internal water accumulation may
lead to flight control surfaces unbalancing
possibly reducing the flutter margins, which
could result in loss of airplane control.
Since this condition may occur in other
airplanes of the same type and affects flight
safety, a corrective action is required. Thus,
sufficient reason exists to request compliance
with this AD in the indicated time limit.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 18, 2010.
On November 18, 2010, the Director
of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on August 3, 2010 (75 FR
45558). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
It has been found that certain regions of the
elevators, elevators trim tabs, and ailerons do
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–500 Airplanes
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63045-63048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25469]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0642; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-332-AD;
Amendment 39-16470; AD 2010-21-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
* * * [F]uel leaks and failed fasteners [have been reported] in
the region of the rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing
rib 2. * * *
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion failures in the region of the
rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib 2, which could lead
to reduced structural integrity of the wing, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane. We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 18, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 18,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR
38058). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
British Aerospace originally issued Service Bulletin (SB) 57-033
in 1989 to detect fuel leaks and failed fasteners in the region of
the rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib 2.
Accomplishment of this SB was mandated by the [Civil Aviation
Authority] CAA United Kingdom AD 044-09-89. Revisions 1 through 7 of
this SB were introduced to inspect pre mod HCM01447A standard
installations for fuel leaks and loose or broken bolts. Modification
HCM01447A
[[Page 63046]]
introduced tension bolts in the attachment fitting instead of the
previous Hi-Lok bolts.
Revision 8 of the SB introduced inspection instructions for post
modification HCM01447A installations because fuel tank leaks and
failed fasteners have subsequently been found on aircraft post
modification HCM01447A. Inspections of the post-mod HCM01447A
standard are required to maintain the structural integrity of the
wing. BAE Systems has now published SB 57-033 Revision 9 that
specifies additional, calendar-time based, inspection criteria to
control the stress corrosion failures of the pre and post
modification HCM01447A installations.
EASA AD 2007-0270 supersedes CAA UK AD 044-09-89 and requires
the accomplishment of inspections and corrective actions, as
necessary, in accordance with BAE Systems SB 57-033 Revision 9.
This [EASA] AD [2007-0270 R1] is revised to clarify that the
calendar compliance times are to be counted from the effective date,
not from the SB issue date.
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion failures in the region of the
rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib 2, which could lead
to reduced structural integrity of the wing, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane. Required actions include a general
inspection to identify the type of bolt and nut at each location,
external inspections of the bolt installation of the fuel tanks,
related investigative actions, and corrective actions, as applicable.
The general inspection includes identifying the type of bolt and
nut at each location.
External inspections of the bolt installation include:
Visually inspecting for proper nut installation, nut
seating, and fuel seepage.
Checking for gaps between the fitting and wing structure.
Checking the nuts with a suitable torque spanner to the
specifications in the torque figures shown in Table 2. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10,
2006, if Hi-Loks are installed, and
Doing either an ultrasonic inspection for damaged bolts or
torque check of the tension bolts.
Related investigative actions include:
Inspecting the condition of the sealant at and around all
rear spar root joint attachment bolts.
Checking the bolt for damage or evidence of the nut being
tightened to the end of the thread.
Examining the wear pattern on the seating surfaces of the
bolt and nut to determine if the bolt and nut have been evenly seated
on the structure.
Visually inspecting the bolt hole and surrounding area for
damage, and
Confirming that the hole edge radius on the forward face
of the rear spar complies with the specifications in Table 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10,
2006.
Corrective actions include either replacing the bolt, or repairing
the defect in accordance with approved repair data from BAE Systems.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Explanation of Change to Applicability
We have revised the applicability of the existing AD to identify
model designations as published in the most recent type certificate
data sheet for the affected models.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 1 product of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $255.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
[[Page 63047]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-21-10 BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED: Amendment 39-16470.
Docket No. FAA-2010-0642; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-332-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
18, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A airplanes, and Model Avro 146-
RJ70A, 146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
* * * [F]uel leaks and failed fasteners [have been reported] in
the region of the rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing
rib 2. * * *
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is stress corrosion failures in the region of
the rear spar root joint attachment fitting at wing rib 2, which
could lead to reduced structural integrity of the wing, and
consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) At the applicable time in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD, do a general visual inspection to identify the type of bolt and
nut at each location, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(1) For airplanes on which neither Modification HCM01447A nor
repair information leaflet (RIL) HC536H9156 (at any location) has
been done as of the effective date of this AD, the compliance time
for the inspection is at the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, or
within 2 years after the last inspection done in accordance with BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033,
whichever occurs later, without exceeding 4,000 flight cycles after
the last inspection.
(ii) Within 250 flight cycles or 3 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which either Modification HCM01447A or RIL
HC536H9156 (at any location) has been done as of the effective date
of this AD, the compliance time for the inspection is at the latest
of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), and
(g)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total flight cycles.
(ii) Within 4,000 flight cycles after all bolts are inspected
and replaced in accordance with BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033.
(iii) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD.
(h) At the applicable time in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD, do detailed inspections of the bolt installation for proper nut
installation, nut seating, and fuel seepage; a detailed inspection
for gaps between the fitting and wing structure; if Hi-Loks are
installed, measure the torque of the nuts to determine the
specifications in the torque figures shown in Table 2. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October
10, 2006; and either an ultrasonic inspection for damaged bolts or a
torque measurement of the tension bolts to determine the
specifications in the torque figures shown in Table 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October
10, 2006. Do all actions in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(i) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, any defect (e.g., evidence of fuel seepage, damaged bolts or low
bolt torque, loose or rotating nuts, suspect integrity of the bolt/
nut assembly, or gaps between the fitting and wing structure) is
found, before further flight, do the actions specified in paragraphs
(i)(1), (i)(2), (i)(3), (i)(4), and (i)(5) of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated
October 10, 2006.
(1) Do a detailed inspection of the sealant for cracks at and
around all rear spar root joint attachment bolts.
(2) Do a detailed inspection of the bolt for damage or evidence
of the nut being tightened to the end of the thread.
(3) Do a detailed inspection of the wear pattern on the seating
surfaces of the bolt and nut to determine if the bolt and nut have
been evenly seated on the structure.
(4) Do a detailed inspection of the bolt hole and surrounding
area for damage.
(5) Do a detailed inspection to determine that the hole edge
radius on the forward face of the rear spar meets the dimensions
specified in Table 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006.
(j) If during any inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i) of
this AD, any defects (e.g., evidence of fuel seepage, damaged bolts
or low bolt torque, loose or rotating nuts, suspect integrity of the
bolt/nut assembly, gaps between the fitting and wing structure,
cracked sealant, bolt damage or evidence of the nut being tightened
to the end of the thread, uneven seating of the bolt and nut, bolt
hole and surrounding area damage, or hole edge radius out of
dimensions specified in Table 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin
ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006), is found, before
further flight, do all applicable correction actions, which include
either replacing the bolt or repairing the defect, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated
October 10, 2006.
(k) Repeat the inspections in paragraph (h) of this AD
thereafter, at the applicable time specified in Table 1 of this AD,
for each individual location.
Table 1--Compliance Times for Repeat Inspections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the location has-- Then repeat the inspection--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Hi-Lok bolt.......................... Within 4,000 flight cycles or
24 months, whichever occurs
earlier, after doing the last
inspection.
A tension bolt that was not replaced Within 8,000 flight cycles or
during the inspections in paragraphs 48 months, whichever occurs
(h) and (i) of this AD and no defects earlier, after doing the last
were found. inspection.
[[Page 63048]]
A tension bolt that was replaced as Within 4,000 flight cycles or
required by paragraph (j) of this AD. 24 months, whichever occurs
earlier after doing the
replacement.
A tension bolt that was not replaced Within 4,000 flight cycles or
and any defects were repaired as 24 months, whichever occurs
required by paragraph (j) of this AD. earlier after doing the repair
specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Service
Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006, allows
additional time to rectify the defect for the corrective action
depending on the condition, this AD requires rectifying the defect
before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(m) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2007-0270 R1, dated November 7, 2007; and BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.57-033,
Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.57-033, Revision 9, dated October 10, 2006; to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; e-mail
RApublications@baesystems.com; Internet https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-25469 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P