Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Model PIAGGIO P-180 Airplanes, 63060-63062 [2010-25217]
Download as PDF
63060
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Piaggio Aero Industries
S.p.a., Via Cibrario, 4–16154 Genoa, Italy;
phone: +39 010 6481 353; fax: +39 010 6481
881; e-mail: airworthiness@piaggioaero.it;
Internet: https://www.piaggioaero.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference for
this AD at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the Central
Region, call (816) 329–3768.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information incorporated by reference
for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 30, 2010.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25284 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0737; Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–037–AD; Amendment
39–16468; AD 2010–21–08]
Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO
AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Model
PIAGGIO P–180 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Some cases of failure of engine oil
dipsticks, installed on Pratt & Whitney
Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B
engines, were detected on P.180 aeroplanes;
such failures, due to moisture penetration
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
This Correction is issued to amend
the AD number heading: It was PAD, it
is AD.
If left uncorrected, this situation
could lead to in-flight engine failure(s).
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 18, 2010.
On November 18, 2010, the Director
of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4145; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 43095).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Some cases of failure of engine oil
dipsticks, installed on Pratt & Whitney
Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B
engines, were detected on P.180 aeroplanes;
such failures, due to moisture penetration
into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion,
can cause incorrect reading of the engine oil
low level on the Refuel/Ground Test Panel.
RIN 2120–AA64
VerDate Mar<15>2010
into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion,
can cause incorrect reading of the engine oil
low level on the Refuel/Ground Test Panel.
If left uncorrected, this situation
could lead to in-flight engine failure(s).
This AD requires:
(1) Repetitive visual checks of the
engine oil levels to prevent an
undetected low level condition;
(2) Repetitive inspections of the oil
dipsticks to detect faulty units;
(3) Replacement of faulty oil dipsticks
or visual checks of the oil level at
reduced not to exceed intervals, until
replacement of faulty units.
The engine TC Holder is currently
developing a modification that will
address the unsafe condition identified
in this AD; once such modification is
developed, approved and available,
further mandatory actions might be
considered.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are highlighted in
a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
99 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2.5 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $21,038 or $212.50 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 1 work-hour and require parts
costing $9,000, for a cost of $9,085 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–21–08 PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES
S.p.A.: Amendment 39–16468; Docket
No. FAA–2010–0737; Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–037–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective November 18, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PIAGGIO AERO
INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Model PIAGGIO P–180
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 79: Engine Oil.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Some cases of failure of engine oil
dipsticks, installed on Pratt & Whitney
Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B
engines, were detected on P.180 aeroplanes;
such failures, due to moisture penetration
into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion,
can cause incorrect reading of the engine oil
low level on the Refuel/Ground Test Panel.
If left uncorrected, this situation could lead
to in-flight engine failure(s).
This AD requires:
(1) Repetitive visual checks of the engine
oil levels to prevent an undetected low level
condition;
(2) Repetitive inspections of the oil
dipsticks to detect faulty units;
(3) Replacement of faulty oil dipsticks or
visual checks of the oil level at reduced not
to exceed intervals, until replacement of
faulty units.
The engine TC Holder is currently
developing a modification that will address
the unsafe condition identified in this AD;
once such modification is developed,
approved and available, further mandatory
actions might be considered.
This Correction is issued to amend the AD
number heading: It was PAD, it is AD.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within one month after November 18,
2010 (the effective date of this AD) or within
25 hours time-in-service (TIS) after
November 18, 2010 (the effective date of this
AD), whichever occurs first, and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed one
month or 25 hours TIS, whichever occurs
first, do the following in both engines:
(i) Visually check the oil level following
the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, of
PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service
Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80–0287, Rev. N. 1,
dated March 24, 2010; and
(ii) Do a functional check and inspection
of the dipstick following the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B and C,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63061
of PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A.
Service Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80–0287,
Rev. N. 1, dated March 24, 2010.
(2) If, as determined by the inspection in
paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, the installed
dipsticks are compliant with P&WC Service
Bulletin no. 14383, the repetitive inspections
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD may
be done at intervals not to exceed one month
or 50 hours TIS, whichever occurs first.
(3) If a failed dipstick is found during any
functional check required in paragraph
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD, do one of the following;
(i) If a replacement dipstick is available,
replace it before further flight; or
(ii) If a replacement dipstick is not
available, the failed dipstick may be
reinstalled, but, until replacement, the oil
level check specified in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of
this AD must be repetitively done in the
affected engine within 5 hours TIS from the
last check. The repetitive oil level check
interval may be extended to 10 hours TIS
based on oil consumption in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, of
PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service
Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80–0287, Rev. N. 1,
dated March 24, 2010.
(4) Replacement of the oil level dipstick
does not terminate the repetitive check
requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816)
329–4090. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120 0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2010 0123,
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
63062
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
dated June 22, 2010; and PIAGGIO AERO
INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service Bulletin
(Mandatory) N.: 80–0287, Rev. N. 1, dated
March 24, 2010, for related information.
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use PIAGGIO AERO
INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service Bulletin
(Mandatory) N.: 80–0287, Rev. N. 1, dated
March 24, 2010, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Piaggio Aero Industries
S.p.A., Via Cibrario, 4–16154 Genoa, Italy;
phone: +39 010 6481 353; fax: +39 010 6481
881; e-mail: tech.support@piaggioaero.it;
Internet: https://www.piaggioaero.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference for
this AD at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the Central
Region, call (816) 329–3768.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information incorporated by reference
for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 29, 2010.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25217 Filed 10–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
A damaged fuel heater caused a fuel
leakage in the engine nacelle; investigation
revealed that the damage to the fuel heater
was due to chafing with an oil cooling system
hose.
Piaggio Aero Industries (PAI) issued
Service Bulletin (SB) 80–0175, which was
applicable to all aeroplanes and contained
instructions for a repetitive inspection of the
affected parts and, if necessary, their
replacement and/or for the repositioning of
oil/fuel tubing if minimum clearances were
not found.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 18, 2010.
On November 18, 2010, the Director
of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S.M.
Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0736; Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–035–AD; Amendment
39–16469; AD 2010–21–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO
AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model
PIAGGIO P–180 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 43101).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
A damaged fuel heater caused a fuel
leakage in the engine nacelle; investigation
revealed that the damage to the fuel heater
was due to chafing with an oil cooling system
hose.
Piaggio Aero Industries (PAI) issued
Service Bulletin (SB) 80–0175, which was
applicable to all aeroplanes and contained
instructions for a repetitive inspection of the
affected parts and, if necessary, their
replacement and/or for the repositioning of
oil/fuel tubing if minimum clearances were
not found.
ENAC of Italy issued PA 2002–335 to
require the accomplishment of these
corrective actions.
Later on, PAI introduced a new Hose
Assembly (P/N 80–337284–001), which
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
allows better clearances and removes the
problem of potential interference. PAI issued
SB 80–0175 Revision 1, limiting the
applicability to aeroplanes with the old P/N
installed only and giving instructions for the
replacement with the new Hose Assembly P/
N.
This new AD, which supersedes ENAC
Italy PA 2002–335, is issued to grant the
revised applicability and to include an
optional terminating action, which consists
in replacing the Hose Assembly P/N 80–
337276–001 with the new P/N 80–337284–
001.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
Request to Clarify Requirement to
Replace Both Flexible Hoses to
Terminate Repetitive Inspections
Carlo Cardu of PIAGGIO AERO
INDUSTRIES S.p.A states that both the
left-hand and right-hand hose assembly,
part number (P/N) 80–337276–001,
must be replaced at the same time with
a new hose assembly, P/N 80–337284–
001, in order to terminate the repetitive
inspection requirement. This
requirement is specified in PIAGGIO
AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service
Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80–0175, Rev.
N. 1, dated May 14, 2010.
The commenter requests clarification
of this requirement in the final rule AD
action.
We agree with the commenter.
Adding this clarification will ensure
that both hose assemblies are replaced
at the same time and will clarify the
intent of the AD issued by the foreign
airworthiness authority and the
manufacturer’s service bulletin.
We are changing the final rule AD
action based on this comment.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63060-63062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25217]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0737; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-037-AD;
Amendment 39-16468; AD 2010-21-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Model
PIAGGIO P-180 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Some cases of failure of engine oil dipsticks, installed on
Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B engines, were
detected on P.180 aeroplanes; such failures, due to moisture
penetration into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion, can cause
incorrect reading of the engine oil low level on the Refuel/Ground
Test Panel.
If left uncorrected, this situation could lead to in-flight engine
failure(s). We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 18, 2010.
On November 18, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4145; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2010 (75 FR
43095). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Some cases of failure of engine oil dipsticks, installed on
Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B engines, were
detected on P.180 aeroplanes; such failures, due to moisture
penetration into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion, can cause
incorrect reading of the engine oil low level on the Refuel/Ground
Test Panel.
If left uncorrected, this situation could lead to in-flight engine
failure(s).
This AD requires:
(1) Repetitive visual checks of the engine oil levels to prevent an
undetected low level condition;
(2) Repetitive inspections of the oil dipsticks to detect faulty
units;
(3) Replacement of faulty oil dipsticks or visual checks of the oil
level at reduced not to exceed intervals, until replacement of faulty
units.
The engine TC Holder is currently developing a modification that
will address the unsafe condition identified in this AD; once such
modification is developed, approved and available, further mandatory
actions might be considered.
This Correction is issued to amend the AD number heading: It was
PAD, it is AD.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 99 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2.5 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $21,038 or $212.50 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $9,000, for a cost of
$9,085 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
[[Page 63061]]
air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-21-08 PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A.: Amendment 39-16468;
Docket No. FAA-2010-0737; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-037-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
18, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Model
PIAGGIO P-180 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 79: Engine
Oil.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Some cases of failure of engine oil dipsticks, installed on
Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PT6A66 and PT6A66B engines, were
detected on P.180 aeroplanes; such failures, due to moisture
penetration into the dipstick and subsequent corrosion, can cause
incorrect reading of the engine oil low level on the Refuel/Ground
Test Panel.
If left uncorrected, this situation could lead to in-flight
engine failure(s).
This AD requires:
(1) Repetitive visual checks of the engine oil levels to prevent
an undetected low level condition;
(2) Repetitive inspections of the oil dipsticks to detect faulty
units;
(3) Replacement of faulty oil dipsticks or visual checks of the
oil level at reduced not to exceed intervals, until replacement of
faulty units.
The engine TC Holder is currently developing a modification that
will address the unsafe condition identified in this AD; once such
modification is developed, approved and available, further mandatory
actions might be considered.
This Correction is issued to amend the AD number heading: It was
PAD, it is AD.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Within one month after November 18, 2010 (the effective date
of this AD) or within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) after November
18, 2010 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs first,
and repetitively thereafter at intervals not to exceed one month or
25 hours TIS, whichever occurs first, do the following in both
engines:
(i) Visually check the oil level following the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part A, of PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service
Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80-0287, Rev. N. 1, dated March 24, 2010;
and
(ii) Do a functional check and inspection of the dipstick
following the Accomplishment Instructions, Part B and C, of PIAGGIO
AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80-0287,
Rev. N. 1, dated March 24, 2010.
(2) If, as determined by the inspection in paragraph (f)(1)(ii)
of this AD, the installed dipsticks are compliant with P&WC Service
Bulletin no. 14383, the repetitive inspections required in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD may be done at intervals not to exceed one month
or 50 hours TIS, whichever occurs first.
(3) If a failed dipstick is found during any functional check
required in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, do one of the
following;
(i) If a replacement dipstick is available, replace it before
further flight; or
(ii) If a replacement dipstick is not available, the failed
dipstick may be reinstalled, but, until replacement, the oil level
check specified in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD must be
repetitively done in the affected engine within 5 hours TIS from the
last check. The repetitive oil level check interval may be extended
to 10 hours TIS based on oil consumption in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, of PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES
S.p.A. Service Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80-0287, Rev. N. 1, dated
March 24, 2010.
(4) Replacement of the oil level dipstick does not terminate the
repetitive check requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4145; fax: (816) 329-4090.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120 0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2010 0123,
[[Page 63062]]
dated June 22, 2010; and PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service
Bulletin (Mandatory) N.: 80-0287, Rev. N. 1, dated March 24, 2010,
for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A. Service Bulletin
(Mandatory) N.: 80-0287, Rev. N. 1, dated March 24, 2010, to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A., Via Cibrario, 4-16154 Genoa, Italy;
phone: +39 010 6481 353; fax: +39 010 6481 881; e-mail:
tech.support@piaggioaero.it; Internet: https://www.piaggioaero.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call (816) 329-3768.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 29, 2010.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-25217 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P