Environmental Impact Statement; Davis County, UT, 62627-62628 [2010-25606]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices
withhold as little as a portion of one
page to multiple boxes of documents.
NHTSA estimates that it will take on
average approximately eight (8) hours
for an entity to prepare a submission
requesting confidential treatment. This
estimate will vary based on the size of
the submission, with smaller and
voluntary submissions taking
considerably less time to prepare. The
agency based this estimate on the
volume of requests received over the
past three years.
NHTSA estimates that it will receive
approximately 450 requests for
confidential treatment annually. This
figure is based on the average number of
requests received over the past three
years. We selected this period because
it provides an estimate based on
incoming requests for the most recent
three years. The agency estimates that
the total burden for this information
collection will be approximately 3,600
hours, which is based on the number of
requests (450) multiplied by the
estimated number of hours to prepare
each submission (8 hours).
Since nothing in the rule requires
those persons who request confidential
treatment pursuant to Part 512 to keep
copies of any records or requests
submitted to us, recordkeeping costs
imposed would be zero hours and zero
costs.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: October 4, 2010.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–25485 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Cancellation of Preparation
of Environmental Impact Statement for
the Tucson International Airport,
Tucson, Pima County, AZ
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of
preparation of environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces that it
has decided to discontinue preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the proposed relocation of
Runway 11R/29L and associated
development at Tucson International
Airport. The FAA’s decision to
discontinue preparation of the EIS is
based upon the results from a planning
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
effort completed by the Tucson Airport
Authority (TAA), the owner and
operator of the airport. This planning
effort reveled the project purpose and
need has changed significantly. As a
result, FAA has determined the new
runway proposal at Tucson
International Airport is not ripe for
decision at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roxana Hernandez, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western-Pacific Region,
Los Angeles Airports District Office,
P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA
90009–2007, Telephone: (310) 725–
3614.
On
October 13, 2005, the FAA, published in
the Federal Register a Notice of Intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and hold a Public
Scoping Meeting at Tucson
International Airport (Volume 70,
Number 197, FR 59800–59801). The EIS
and Public Scoping Meeting were to
address the proposed relocation of
Runway 11R/29L and associated
development at airport.
In 2005, the FAA based its decision to
prepare the EIS on the procedures
described in FAA Order 5050.4A,
Airport Environmental Handbook, and
FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures. FAA
also based its decision to prepare a
federal EIS primarily on TAA’s proposal
to relocate Runway 11R/29L, 450 feet to
the southwest, creating a centerline to
centerline separation of 1,156 feet
between the existing Runway 11L29R.
The length of the relocated Runway
11R/29L would have been 11,000 feet
long by 150 feet wide.
Recently, the TAA completed a
planning effort that reveled that the
project’s purpose and need changed
significantly. Therefore, when the TAA
submits a new Airport Layout Plan with
a revised project depicted on it, the FAA
will determine the appropriate National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
documentation necessary to assess the
environmental effects of those
improvements pursuant to FAA Order
5050.4B, National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions
for Airport Actions, and FAA Order
1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Hawthorne, California on
September 30, 2010.
Debbie Roth,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Western—
Pacific Region, AWP–600.
[FR Doc. 2010–25483 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62627
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Davis County, UT
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
FWHA is issuing this notice
to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared for proposed
transportation improvements in Davis
County, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Woolford, Environmental
Program Manager, Federal Highway
Administration, 2520 West 4700 South,
Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118,
Telephone: (801) 955–3500, e-mail
Edward.Woolford@dot.gov; or Charles
Mace, Project Manager, Utah
Department of Transportation, Region
One Office, 166 West Southwell Street,
Ogden, UT 84404–4194, Telephone:
(801) 620–1685, e-mail
cmace@utah.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FWHA, in
cooperation with the Utah Department
of Transportation (UDOT), will prepare
an EIS on a proposal to address current
and projected traffic demand on 1800
North (SR–37) in the cities of Clinton
and Sunset in Davis County, Utah. The
proposed project area extends from 2000
West to I–15 along 1800 North, a
distance of approximately 2 miles.
Transportation improvements in this
area are needed to address current and
projected 2040 traffic demand along the
existing two-lane 1800 North corridor,
provide better east-west access, and
improve safety.
The FHWA will consider a reasonable
range of alternatives that meet the
project purpose and need and are based
on agency and public input. These
alternatives include: (1) Taking no
action; (2) using alternate travel modes;
(3) upgrading and adding lanes to the
existing roadway network, including
1800 North; (4) a grade separation at the
Union Pacific Railroad crossing on 1800
North; (5) a new interchange on I–15 at
1800 North; (6) improving adjacent
interchanges on I–15; (7) combinations
of any of the above; and (8) other
feasible alternatives identified during
the scoping process.
A Coordination Plan is being prepared
to define the agency and public
participation procedure for the
environmental review process. The plan
will outline how agencies and the
public will provide input during the
scoping process, the development of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
62628
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices
purpose and need, and alternatives
development.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, state, and local
agencies, as well as to Native American
tribes, and to private organizations and
citizens who have previously expressed,
or who are known to have, an interest
in this proposal. These letters will invite
agencies, tribes, and the public to
participate in scoping meetings at
locations and dates to be determined.
Public meetings will be held to allow
the public, as well as Federal, state, and
local agencies, and tribes, to provide
comments on the purpose and need for
the project, potential alternatives, and
social, economic, and environmental
issues of concern.
In addition, a public hearing will be
held following the release of the draft
EIS. Public notice advertisements and
direct mailings will notify interested
parties of the time and place of the
public meetings and the public hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action is
addressed and all significant issues are
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to FHWA or UDOT at the
addresses provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20–205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
James Christian,
Salt Lake City, Utah.
[FR Doc. 2010–25606 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) has
received a request for a waiver of
compliance from certain requirements
of its safety standards. The individual
petition is described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
South Carolina Railroad Museum, Inc.
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2010–
0095]
The South Carolina Railroad Museum
(SCRM) is a non-profit (501)(c)(3)
railroad museum located near
Winnsboro, South Carolina, which
operates excursion passenger trains
primarily on certain weekends and on
special charters as part of its museum
activity. SCRM seeks a waiver from
compliance with 49 CFR 240.201(d),
which provides that only certified
persons may operate trains or
locomotives. The waiver would affect
only persons who participate in the
‘‘engineer for a day’’ program, which
would allow non-certified persons to
operate a diesel electric locomotive as
the ‘‘engineer.’’ Various restrictions
would be placed on these operations.
The waiver would cover operations
on 5,280 feet of main line track between
Milepost (MP) 4 and MP 5 that would
be placed under absolute block control
(section of track can only be occupied
by one train at a time) during these
operations. This section of track does
not have any public highway-rail grade
crossings on it, and is located largely
within the confines of Rion Quarry,
which is no longer in operation.
SCRM has an annual budget of
approximately $180,000.00. SCRM has
no employees. All excursion trains are
staffed by volunteers who have been
through testing and certification for
their respective train crew duties. The
‘‘engineer for a day’’ program would
allow SCRM to supplement its
education programs and generate
needed additional income for
preservation and for providing a
railroad experience to persons visiting
the museum.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2010–
0095) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Page 19477) or at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 4,
2010.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–25487 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
[REG–104072–97]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Regulation Project
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62627-62628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement; Davis County, UT
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FWHA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for proposed
transportation improvements in Davis County, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Woolford, Environmental Program
Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 2520 West 4700 South, Suite
9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118, Telephone: (801) 955-3500, e-mail
Edward.Woolford@dot.gov; or Charles Mace, Project Manager, Utah
Department of Transportation, Region One Office, 166 West Southwell
Street, Ogden, UT 84404-4194, Telephone: (801) 620-1685, e-mail
cmace@utah.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FWHA, in cooperation with the Utah
Department of Transportation (UDOT), will prepare an EIS on a proposal
to address current and projected traffic demand on 1800 North (SR-37)
in the cities of Clinton and Sunset in Davis County, Utah. The proposed
project area extends from 2000 West to I-15 along 1800 North, a
distance of approximately 2 miles. Transportation improvements in this
area are needed to address current and projected 2040 traffic demand
along the existing two-lane 1800 North corridor, provide better east-
west access, and improve safety.
The FHWA will consider a reasonable range of alternatives that meet
the project purpose and need and are based on agency and public input.
These alternatives include: (1) Taking no action; (2) using alternate
travel modes; (3) upgrading and adding lanes to the existing roadway
network, including 1800 North; (4) a grade separation at the Union
Pacific Railroad crossing on 1800 North; (5) a new interchange on I-15
at 1800 North; (6) improving adjacent interchanges on I-15; (7)
combinations of any of the above; and (8) other feasible alternatives
identified during the scoping process.
A Coordination Plan is being prepared to define the agency and
public participation procedure for the environmental review process.
The plan will outline how agencies and the public will provide input
during the scoping process, the development of the
[[Page 62628]]
purpose and need, and alternatives development.
Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will
be sent to appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies, as well as
to Native American tribes, and to private organizations and citizens
who have previously expressed, or who are known to have, an interest in
this proposal. These letters will invite agencies, tribes, and the
public to participate in scoping meetings at locations and dates to be
determined.
Public meetings will be held to allow the public, as well as
Federal, state, and local agencies, and tribes, to provide comments on
the purpose and need for the project, potential alternatives, and
social, economic, and environmental issues of concern.
In addition, a public hearing will be held following the release of
the draft EIS. Public notice advertisements and direct mailings will
notify interested parties of the time and place of the public meetings
and the public hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action is addressed and all significant issues are identified, comments
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to FHWA or UDOT at the addresses provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20-205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
James Christian,
Salt Lake City, Utah.
[FR Doc. 2010-25606 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
