Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee: Approval of Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards for the Nashville, TN Area, 62354-62358 [2010-25448]
Download as PDF
62354
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0663–201037; FRL–
9212–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee:
Approval of Section 110(a)(1)
Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standards for the Nashville, TN
Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a draft revision to the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to
EPA on August 3, 2010, for parallel
processing. The proposed revision
modifies Tennessee’s SIP to address the
required maintenance plan for the 1997
8-hour ozone standards for the
Nashville, Tennessee 1997 8-hour ozone
maintenance area, hereafter referred to
as ‘‘the Nashville Area.’’ The Nashville
Area is comprised of Davidson,
Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and
Wilson Counties in their entireties. This
maintenance plan was submitted to EPA
by the State of Tennessee, through the
Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC), to ensure the
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) through the year
2018 in the Nashville Area. EPA is
approving the SIP revision pursuant to
section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
This maintenance plan meets all the
statutory and regulatory requirements,
and is consistent with EPA’s guidance.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2010–0663, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0663,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Oct 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2010–
0663. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Royce Dansby-Sparks, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9187.
Mr. Dansby-Sparks can also be reached
via electronic mail at dansbysparks.royce@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA’s Analysis of Tennessee’s Submittal
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive order Reviews
I. Background
In accordance with the CAA, the
Nashville Area was designated
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS on November 6, 1991, 56 FR
56694 (effective January 6, 1992, 60 FR
7124). On November 14, 2004, the State
of Tennessee, through the TDEC,
submitted a request to redesignate the
Nashville Area to attainment for the
1-hour ozone NAAQS (see 61 FR
55903). Subsequently on August 9,
1995, and January 19, 1996, Tennessee
submitted supplementary information
which included revised contingency
measures and emission projections.
Included with the 1-hour ozone
redesignation request, Tennessee
submitted the required
1-hour ozone monitoring data and
maintenance plan ensuring the Area
would remain in attainment for the
1-hour ozone NAAQS for at least a
period of 10 years (consistent with CAA
175A(a)). The maintenance plan
submitted by Tennessee followed EPA
guidance for maintenance areas, subject
to section 175A of the CAA.
On October 30, 1996, EPA approved
Tennessee’s request to redesignate the
Nashville Area to attainment for the
1-hour ozone NAAQS (61 FR 55903).
The maintenance plan for the Area
became effective on October 30, 1996.
Tennessee later updated the
maintenance plan in accordance with
section 175(A)(b) on August 10, 2005, to
extend the maintenance plan to cover
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
additional years such that the entire
maintenance period was for at least 20
years after the initial redesignation of
the Area to attainment. EPA approved
Tennessee’s maintenance plan update
for the Nashville Area on November 1,
2005 (see 70 FR 65838).
On April 30, 2004, EPA designated
and classified areas for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and
published the final Phase 1 Rule for
implementation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase 1
Rule), ultimately revoking the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS. The Nashville Area,
however, was still required to fulfill
requirements under the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS due to its participation in an
Early Action Compact (EAC). For areas
participating in an EAC, the effective
designation date for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS was deferred until
December 31, 2006, in a final action
published by EPA on August 19, 2005
(70 FR 50988) and later extended to
April 15, 2008 (71 FR 69022) for most
of the EAC Areas, including Nashville,
so long as the Area continued to meet
milestone requirements. Therefore, the
requirement for an attainment area to
submit a 10-year maintenance plan
under 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the
Phase 1 Rule was also postponed until
the Area was effectively designated for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The
Nashville Area was later designated as
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, effective April 15, 2008, with
the 1-hour ozone requirements no
longer effective on April 15, 2009 (73 FR
17897). The attainment area was
consequently required to submit a 10year maintenance plan under section
110(a)(1) of the CAA and the Phase 1
Rule.
On May 20, 2005, EPA issued
guidance providing information on how
a state might fulfill the maintenance
plan obligation established by the CAA
and the Phase 1 Rule (Memorandum
from Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division
Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance
Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone
Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean
Air Act, May 20, 2005, hereafter referred
to as the ‘‘Wegman Memorandum’’). On
December 22, 2006, the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that
vacated EPA’s Phase 1 Rule for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SQAMD)
v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
The Court vacated those portions of the
Phase 1 Rule that provided for
regulation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas designated under
Subpart 1 in lieu of Subpart 2 (of part
D of the CAA), among other portions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Oct 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
The Court’s decision does not alter any
requirements under the Phase 1 Rule for
section 110(a)(l) maintenance plans.
EPA is proposing to take action to
approve Tennessee’s August 3, 2010,
SIP revision, submitted for parallel
processing, which satisfy CAA section
110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan
providing for maintenance of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Nashville
Area.
II. EPA’s Analysis of Tennessee’s
Submittal
On August 3, 2010, the State of
Tennessee, through the TDEC and the
Metro Nashville/Davidson County
Pollution Control Division Office,
submitted a proposed SIP revision for
parallel processing containing the 1997
8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the
Nashville Area as required by section
110(a)(1) of the CAA and the provisions
of EPA’s Phase 1 Rule (see 40 CFR
51.905(a)(4)). The purpose of the plan is
to ensure continued attainment and
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS until 2018 for this attainment
area.
The August 3, 2010, SIP revision is
not yet state-effective, therefore,
Tennessee has requested that EPA
‘‘parallel process’’ the SIP revision.
Under this procedure, the Regional
Office works closely with the state
while developing new or revised
regulations. Generally, the state submits
a copy of the proposed regulation or
other revisions to EPA before
conducting its public hearing. EPA
reviews this proposed state action, and
prepares a notice of proposed
rulemaking. EPA’s notice of proposed
rulemaking is published in the Federal
Register during approximately the same
time frame that the state is holding its
public hearing. The state and EPA then
provide for public comment periods on
both the state and federal actions.
After Tennessee submits the formal
state-effective SIP revision request
(including a response to all public
comments raised during the state’s
public participation process, and the
1997 8-hour ozone 110(a)(1)
maintenance plan), EPA will prepare a
final rulemaking notice for the SIP
revision. If Tennessee’s rulemaking to
address the 1997 8-hour ozone 110(a)(1)
maintenance plan contains changes
which occur after EPA’s notice of
proposed rulemaking, such change must
be described in EPA’s final rulemaking
action. If Tennessee’s changes are
significant, EPA must decide whether it
is appropriate to repropose action on the
state’s changes to their submittal to
address the 1997 8-hour ozone 110(a)(1)
maintenance plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62355
As required, the plan provides for
continued attainment and maintenance
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the
Nashville Area for at least 10 years from
the effective date of this Area’s
designation as attainment for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. The plan also
includes components illustrating how
the Area will continue attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and
provides contingency measures. The
Section 110(a)(1) plan components are
discussed below for the Nashville Area.
(a) Attainment Inventory. In order to
demonstrate maintenance in the
aforementioned area, Tennessee
developed comprehensive inventories of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions from
area, point, on-road mobile, non-road
mobile, and aircraft, locomotive, and
commercial marine (ALM) sources using
2007 as the base year. According to the
May 20, 2005, guidance, a state may use
one of the three years for which the
1997 8-hour attainment designation was
based (2001, 2002, and 2003) as their
attainment inventory base year.
However, due to the fact that the
Nashville Area was an EAC area, the
effective date of designation was
deferred to April 15, 2008, and therefore
consideration of a later base year of
2005, 2006, or 2007 was required for the
purpose of an emissions inventory. For
the purpose of this maintenance plan,
Tennessee chose 2007 as the attainment
level emissions base year for the
Nashville Area. The state’s submittal
contains the detailed inventory data and
summaries by source category for the
Nashville Area.
In accordance with Consolidated
Emissions Reporting Rule requirements
(CERR), Tennessee compiles a statewide
emissions inventory for point sources
on an annual basis. On-road mobile
emissions of VOC and NOX were
estimated using MOBILE6.2 motor
vehicle emissions factor computer
model. Non-road mobile emissions data
were derived using the U.S. EPA’s
NONROAD 2008 model. ALM emissions
were primarily estimated based on
EPA’s National Emissions Inventory.
In projecting data for the maintenance
year 2018 emissions inventories,
Tennessee used several methods to
project data from the base year 2007 to
the interim years 2010, 2014, and 2018.
These projected inventories were
developed using EPA-approved
technologies and methodologies
including the Southeastern Emissions
Modeling, Analysis, and Planning
methodology. Projected point, area, and
non-road mobile source inventories
were developed using the 2007 base
year inventories and economic growth
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
62356
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
factors from EPA’s Economic Growth
and Analysis System.
The following tables provide VOC and
NOX emissions data for the 2007 base
attainment year inventories, as well as
projected VOC and NOX emissions
inventory data for 2010, 2014, and 2018.
The Phase 1 Rule provides that the 10year maintenance period begin as of the
effective date of designation for the 1997
8-hour NAAQS for the Area. The
designations for the 13 EAC attainment
areas (of which Nashville was one) were
effective in April 2008 so the
maintenance period must end no earlier
than 2018.
TABLE 1—2007 VOC AND NOX BASE YEAR EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE NASHVILLE AREA
[Tons/day]
County
Point
Area
Onroad
Nonroad
ALM
Total *
—NOX emissions—
Davidson ..........................................................................
Rutherford ........................................................................
Sumner .............................................................................
Williamson ........................................................................
Wilson ..............................................................................
11.52
0.33
18.74
0.06
0.00
0.62
2.79
0.24
0.86
1.23
45.70
17.29
6.07
12.60
13.12
9.57
5.45
2.57
3.58
2.19
3.35
1.26
0.78
1.36
0.15
70.76
27.11
28.41
18.47
16.68
Total * ........................................................................
30.65
5.75
94.79
23.36
6.90
161.44
County
Point
Area
Onroad
Nonroad
ALM
Total
—VOC emissions—
Davidson ..........................................................................
Rutherford ........................................................................
Sumner .............................................................................
Williamson ........................................................................
Wilson ..............................................................................
5.05
5.97
0.97
0.31
0.00
20.98
11.02
6.78
6.00
4.88
17.73
6.65
3.53
5.05
3.32
15.06
4.44
2.68
2.64
4.80
0.60
0.20
0.08
0.07
0.05
59.42
28.28
14.05
14.06
13.04
Total * ........................................................................
12.31
49.66
36.27
29.62
1.00
128.85
* Due to conventional rounding rules, emission totals listed in Tables 1 and 2 may not reflect the absolute mathematical totals.
TABLE 2—PROJECTED VOC AND NOX EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE NASHVILLE AREA
[Tons/day]
Source type
2007
2010
2014
2018
—NOX emissions—
Point .................................................................................................................................
Area .................................................................................................................................
Onroad .............................................................................................................................
Nonroad ...........................................................................................................................
ALM ..................................................................................................................................
30.65
5.75
94.79
23.36
6.90
30.33
5.88
76.72
21.08
6.93
31.59
6.07
55.79
16.38
7.12
31.61
6.25
28.53
12.37
7.36
Total * ........................................................................................................................
161.44
140.93
116.95
86.11
—VOC emissions—
Point .................................................................................................................................
Area .................................................................................................................................
Onroad .............................................................................................................................
Nonroad ...........................................................................................................................
ALM ..................................................................................................................................
12.31
49.66
36.27
29.62
1.00
12.49
51.48
30.43
25.87
1.07
13.18
54.14
22.13
20.27
1.17
14.50
57.77
14.84
16.70
1.27
Total * ........................................................................................................................
128.85
121.34
110.88
105.07
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
* Due to conventional rounding rules, emission totals listed in Tables 1 and 2 may not reflect the absolute mathematical totals.
As shown in Table 2 above, the
Nashville Area is projected to steadily
decrease its total VOC and NOX
emissions from the base year of 2007 to
the maintenance year of 2018. This VOC
and NOX emission decrease
demonstrates continued attainment/
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for ten years from 2008 (i.e., the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Oct 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
year the Area was effectively designated
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS) as required by the CAA and
Phase 1 Rule. NOX and VOC emissions
are expected to decrease approximately
47 and 18 percent, respectively, from
the attainment base year to 2018. These
projected reductions of ozone
precursors ensure continued
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS.
The attainment inventories submitted
by Tennessee for this Area are
consistent with the criteria as discussed
in the Wegman Memorandum. EPA
finds that the future emission levels for
the projected years 2010, 2014, and
2018, are expected to be less than the
attainment level emissions in 2007. In
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
62357
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the event that future 1997 8-hour ozone
monitoring values in the Area are found
to violate the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, the contingency plan section of
the Area’s maintenance plan includes
measures that will be promptly
implemented to ensure that the Area
returns to maintenance of the 1997
ozone NAAQS. Please see section (d)
Contingency Plan, below, for additional
information related to the contingency
measures in the maintenance plan.
(b) Maintenance Demonstration. The
primary purpose of a maintenance plan
is to demonstrate how an area will
continue to remain in attainment with
the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the
10-year period following the effective
date of designation as unclassifiable/
attainment. The required end projection
year for the Nashville Area is 2018. As
discussed in section (a) Attainment
Inventory above, Tennessee identified
the level of ozone-forming emissions
that were consistent with attainment of
the NAAQS for ozone in 2007.
Tennessee projected VOC and NOX
emissions for 2010, 2014, and 2018.
EPA finds that the future emissions
levels in these years are expected to be
below the emissions levels in 2007 in
the Nashville Area.
Tennessee’s SIP revision for the
maintenance plan for the Nashville Area
also relies on the closure of large parts
of the operations of E.I. du Pont
Nemours and Company located in
Davidson County resulting in significant
reductions of both VOC and NOX. The
Nashville Attainment Area is also
benefiting from the following reductions
that are occurring in other states in the
Southeast: (1) North Carolina Clean
Smokestacks Act, (2) Atlanta/Northern
Kentucky/Birmingham 1-hour SIPs, (3)
NOX reasonably available control
technology in 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area SIP, and (4)
implementation of NOX SIP Call Phase
1 in southeastern states. Moreover,
despite the legal status of the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) as remanded,
many facilities have already installed or
are continuing with plans to install
emission controls that may benefit the
Nashville Area.
(c) Consideration of CAIR. The NOX
SIP Call requires states to make
significant, specific emissions
reductions. It also provided a
mechanism, the NOX Budget Trading
Program, which states could use to
achieve those reductions. When EPA
promulgated CAIR, it discontinued
(starting in 2009) the NOX Budget
Trading Program, 40 CFR 51.121(r), but
created another mechanism—the CAIR
ozone season trading program—which
states could use to meet their SIP Call
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Oct 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
obligations (70 FR 25289–90). EPA notes
that a number of states, when
submitting SIP revisions to require
sources to participate in the CAIR ozone
season trading program, removed the
SIP provisions that required sources to
participate in the NOX Budget Trading
Program. In addition, because the
provisions of CAIR, including the ozone
season NOX trading program, remain in
place during the remand (North
Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (DC Cir.
2008)), EPA is not currently
administering the NOX Budget Trading
Program. Nonetheless, all states,
regardless of the current status of their
regulations that previously required
participation in the NOX Budget Trading
Program, will remain subject to all of
the requirements in the NOX SIP Call,
even if the existing CAIR ozone season
trading program is withdrawn or
altered. In addition, the anti-backsliding
provisions of 40 CFR 51.905(f)
specifically provide that the provisions
of the NOX SIP Call, including the
statewide NOX emission budgets,
continue to apply after revocation of the
1-hour standards.
All NOX SIP Call states have SIPs that
currently satisfy their obligations under
the SIP Call, the SIP Call reduction
requirements are being met, and EPA
will continue to enforce the
requirements of the NOX SIP Call even
after any response to the CAIR remand.
For these reasons, EPA believes that
regardless of the status of the CAIR
program, the NOX SIP call requirements
can be relied upon in demonstrating
maintenance.
(d) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.
The table below shows design values 1
for the Nashville Area. The ambient
ozone monitoring data were collected at
sites that were selected with assistance
from EPA and are considered
representative of the areas of highest
concentration. The State of Tennessee
and Metro Nashville/Davidson County
Pollution Control Division Office will
continue to conduct ambient air quality
monitoring programs for ozone in their
respective areas. All monitoring
programs will continue in accordance
with applicable EPA monitoring
requirements contained in 40 CFR part
58. Any modification to the ambient air
monitoring network will be
1 The air quality design value at a monitoring site
is defined as the concentration that when reduced
to the level of the standard ensures that the site
meets the standard. For a concentration-based
standard, the air quality design value is simply the
standard-related test statistic. Thus, for the primary
and secondary 1997 8-hour ozone standards, the 3year average annual forth-highest daily maximum 8hour average ozone concentration is also the air
quality design value for the site. 40 CFR part 50,
appendix I, section 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accomplished through close
consultation with EPA. The Nashville
Area has not had a monitor design value
that exceeded the 1997 8-hour NAAQS
since the 2001–2003 design value timeperiod as seen in Table 3.2
TABLE 3—MAXIMUM 8-HOUR OZONE
DESIGN VALUES
[Parts per million]
Years
1994–1996
1995–1997
1996–1998
1997–1999
1998–2000
1999–2001
2000–2002
2001–2003
2002–2004
2003–2005
2004–2006
2005–2007
2006–2008
2007–2009
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Design value
0.099
0.099
0.101
0.102
0.100
0.093
0.088
0.086
0.083
0.082
0.083
0.084
0.084
0.078
The maximum design value for 2007
through 2009 identified in Table 3
demonstrate attainment of the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS at a level of 0.079
parts per million (ppm). Further, these
design values indicate that the Nashville
maintenance Area is expected to
continue attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS based on a gradual
decrease in the design values. The
attainment level for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standards is 0.080 ppm,
effectively 0.084 ppm with the rounding
convention. In the event that a design
value for the Nashville Area monitors
exceed the 1997 8-hour ozone
standards, one or more contingency
measures included in Tennessee’s
maintenance plan would be promptly
implemented in accordance with the
contingency plan, as discussed below.
(e) Contingency Plan. In accordance
with 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4)(ii) and the
Wegman Memorandum, the Section
110(a)(1) maintenance plan includes
contingency provisions to promptly
correct a violation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS that may occur. The state
of Tennessee has established two
triggers to activate contingency
measures including: (1) Quality assured
ambient air quality monitoring data
showing a violation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS at any monitor, and
(2) an increase in the actual ozone
precursor emissions of at least ten
2 Under EPA regulations found at 40 CFR part 50,
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS are attained when
the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily
maximum 8-hour ambient air quality ozone
concentrations is less than 0.08 parts per million
(i.e., 0.084 when rounding is considered).
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
62358
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
percent over the 2007 emissions
inventory. In the maintenance plan, if
contingency measures are triggered, the
State of Tennessee and Metro Nashville/
Davidson County Pollution Control
Division Office are committed to
implement the measures as
expeditiously as practicable, including
adopting one or more contingency
measures as expeditiously as practical
and implementing the measures within
twenty-four months of the triggering
event. The contingency measures
include: (1) Expansion of NOX and/or
VOC control strategies in the Nashville
Maintenance Area; (2) in conjunction
with the State of Tennessee,
implementation of mobile source
transportation controls such as reduced
speed limits for heavy duty diesel
vehicles; (3) lowering major source
thresholds; (4) expansion of the open
burning ban in Davidson County to
include homeowners in the area; (5)
implementation of anti-idling
legislation; and/or (6) any other control
measure determined to be appropriate at
the time a trigger is exceeded.
These contingency measures and
schedules for implementation satisfy
EPA’s long-standing guidance on the
requirements of section 110(a)(1) of
continued attainment. Continued
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Nashville Area will
depend, in part, on the air quality
measures discussed previously (see
section II). In addition, the State of
Tennessee and Metro Nashville/
Davidson County Pollution Control
Division Office commit to verify the
1997 8-hour ozone status in this
maintenance plan through periodic
ozone precursor emission inventory
updates. Emission inventory updates
will be completed by 18 months
following the end of the inventory year
to verify continued attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
III. Proposed Action
Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the
CAA, EPA is proposing to approve the
maintenance plan addressing the 1997
8-hour ozone standards in the Nashville
Area, submitted by the State of
Tennessee, through TDEC, on August 3,
2010. The maintenance plan ensures
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS through the maintenance
year 2018. EPA has evaluated
Tennessee’s submittal and has
preliminarily determined that it meets
the applicable requirements of the CAA
and EPA regulations, and is consistent
with EPA policy.
On March 12, 2008, EPA issued
revised ozone NAAQS. On September
16, 2009, EPA announced it would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Oct 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
reconsider the 2008 NAAQS for ozone
and proposed a new schedule for
designations for the reconsidered
NAAQS. The current action, however, is
being taken to address requirements
under the 1997 8-hour ozone standards.
Requirements for the Nashville Area
under the 2010 reconsidered ozone
NAAQS will be addressed in the future.
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 28, 2010.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2010–25448 Filed 10–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 122
[FRL–9211–2]
Stakeholder Input on Stormwater
Rulemaking Related to the Chesapeake
Bay; Notice of Public Meeting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
AGENCY:
The purpose of this document
is to announce EPA’s intent to hold
several public ‘‘listening sessions’’ in
October and November 2010 and to
request input from the public on
Chesapeake Bay-specific provisions of a
new stormwater rulemaking. On
December 28, 2009, EPA issued a
Federal Register Notice announcing
EPA’s initiation of a national
rulemaking to establish a program to
better protect waterbodies from the
harmful effects of stormwater discharges
from new development and
redevelopment and make other
regulatory improvements to strengthen
its stormwater program. A range of
public and private stakeholders
provided input through both written
comments and during a series of public
listening sessions.
EPA is now soliciting input
specifically on potential provisions of
this stormwater rulemaking with respect
to the Chesapeake Bay watershed, with
several public ‘‘listening sessions’’ to be
held in October and November 2010,
and an interactive Webcast scheduled
for November 16, 2010. EPA seeks input
on whether to consider, among other
things, the following: Regulating
additional stormwater discharges not
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 195 (Friday, October 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62354-62358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25448]
[[Page 62354]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0663-201037; FRL-9212-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee:
Approval of Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standards for the Nashville, TN Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a draft revision to the Tennessee
State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on August 3, 2010,
for parallel processing. The proposed revision modifies Tennessee's SIP
to address the required maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standards for the Nashville, Tennessee 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance
area, hereafter referred to as ``the Nashville Area.'' The Nashville
Area is comprised of Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and
Wilson Counties in their entireties. This maintenance plan was
submitted to EPA by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee
Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), to ensure the
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) through the year 2018 in the Nashville Area.
EPA is approving the SIP revision pursuant to section 110 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). This maintenance plan meets all the statutory and
regulatory requirements, and is consistent with EPA's guidance.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2010-0663, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0663, Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2010-0663. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Royce Dansby-Sparks, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9187. Mr. Dansby-Sparks can also be reached via electronic
mail at dansby-sparks.royce@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA's Analysis of Tennessee's Submittal
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive order Reviews
I. Background
In accordance with the CAA, the Nashville Area was designated
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS on November 6, 1991, 56 FR
56694 (effective January 6, 1992, 60 FR 7124). On November 14, 2004,
the State of Tennessee, through the TDEC, submitted a request to
redesignate the Nashville Area to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS
(see 61 FR 55903). Subsequently on August 9, 1995, and January 19,
1996, Tennessee submitted supplementary information which included
revised contingency measures and emission projections. Included with
the 1-hour ozone redesignation request, Tennessee submitted the
required 1-hour ozone monitoring data and maintenance plan ensuring the
Area would remain in attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for at least
a period of 10 years (consistent with CAA 175A(a)). The maintenance
plan submitted by Tennessee followed EPA guidance for maintenance
areas, subject to section 175A of the CAA.
On October 30, 1996, EPA approved Tennessee's request to
redesignate the Nashville Area to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS
(61 FR 55903). The maintenance plan for the Area became effective on
October 30, 1996. Tennessee later updated the maintenance plan in
accordance with section 175(A)(b) on August 10, 2005, to extend the
maintenance plan to cover
[[Page 62355]]
additional years such that the entire maintenance period was for at
least 20 years after the initial redesignation of the Area to
attainment. EPA approved Tennessee's maintenance plan update for the
Nashville Area on November 1, 2005 (see 70 FR 65838).
On April 30, 2004, EPA designated and classified areas for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and published the final Phase 1 Rule
for implementation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase
1 Rule), ultimately revoking the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. The Nashville
Area, however, was still required to fulfill requirements under the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS due to its participation in an Early Action Compact
(EAC). For areas participating in an EAC, the effective designation
date for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS was deferred until December 31,
2006, in a final action published by EPA on August 19, 2005 (70 FR
50988) and later extended to April 15, 2008 (71 FR 69022) for most of
the EAC Areas, including Nashville, so long as the Area continued to
meet milestone requirements. Therefore, the requirement for an
attainment area to submit a 10-year maintenance plan under 110(a)(1) of
the CAA and the Phase 1 Rule was also postponed until the Area was
effectively designated for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Nashville
Area was later designated as attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, effective April 15, 2008, with the 1-hour ozone requirements no
longer effective on April 15, 2009 (73 FR 17897). The attainment area
was consequently required to submit a 10-year maintenance plan under
section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the Phase 1 Rule.
On May 20, 2005, EPA issued guidance providing information on how a
state might fulfill the maintenance plan obligation established by the
CAA and the Phase 1 Rule (Memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman to Air
Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-
hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20,
2005, hereafter referred to as the ``Wegman Memorandum''). On December
22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that vacated EPA's Phase 1 Rule for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SQAMD) v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006). The Court
vacated those portions of the Phase 1 Rule that provided for regulation
of the 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas designated under Subpart 1
in lieu of Subpart 2 (of part D of the CAA), among other portions. The
Court's decision does not alter any requirements under the Phase 1 Rule
for section 110(a)(l) maintenance plans.
EPA is proposing to take action to approve Tennessee's August 3,
2010, SIP revision, submitted for parallel processing, which satisfy
CAA section 110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan providing for
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Nashville Area.
II. EPA's Analysis of Tennessee's Submittal
On August 3, 2010, the State of Tennessee, through the TDEC and the
Metro Nashville/Davidson County Pollution Control Division Office,
submitted a proposed SIP revision for parallel processing containing
the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Nashville Area as
required by section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the provisions of EPA's
Phase 1 Rule (see 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4)). The purpose of the plan is to
ensure continued attainment and maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS until 2018 for this attainment area.
The August 3, 2010, SIP revision is not yet state-effective,
therefore, Tennessee has requested that EPA ``parallel process'' the
SIP revision. Under this procedure, the Regional Office works closely
with the state while developing new or revised regulations. Generally,
the state submits a copy of the proposed regulation or other revisions
to EPA before conducting its public hearing. EPA reviews this proposed
state action, and prepares a notice of proposed rulemaking. EPA's
notice of proposed rulemaking is published in the Federal Register
during approximately the same time frame that the state is holding its
public hearing. The state and EPA then provide for public comment
periods on both the state and federal actions.
After Tennessee submits the formal state-effective SIP revision
request (including a response to all public comments raised during the
state's public participation process, and the 1997 8-hour ozone
110(a)(1) maintenance plan), EPA will prepare a final rulemaking notice
for the SIP revision. If Tennessee's rulemaking to address the 1997 8-
hour ozone 110(a)(1) maintenance plan contains changes which occur
after EPA's notice of proposed rulemaking, such change must be
described in EPA's final rulemaking action. If Tennessee's changes are
significant, EPA must decide whether it is appropriate to repropose
action on the state's changes to their submittal to address the 1997 8-
hour ozone 110(a)(1) maintenance plan.
As required, the plan provides for continued attainment and
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Nashville Area for at
least 10 years from the effective date of this Area's designation as
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The plan also includes
components illustrating how the Area will continue attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and provides contingency measures. The Section
110(a)(1) plan components are discussed below for the Nashville Area.
(a) Attainment Inventory. In order to demonstrate maintenance in
the aforementioned area, Tennessee developed comprehensive inventories
of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOX)
emissions from area, point, on-road mobile, non-road mobile, and
aircraft, locomotive, and commercial marine (ALM) sources using 2007 as
the base year. According to the May 20, 2005, guidance, a state may use
one of the three years for which the 1997 8-hour attainment designation
was based (2001, 2002, and 2003) as their attainment inventory base
year. However, due to the fact that the Nashville Area was an EAC area,
the effective date of designation was deferred to April 15, 2008, and
therefore consideration of a later base year of 2005, 2006, or 2007 was
required for the purpose of an emissions inventory. For the purpose of
this maintenance plan, Tennessee chose 2007 as the attainment level
emissions base year for the Nashville Area. The state's submittal
contains the detailed inventory data and summaries by source category
for the Nashville Area.
In accordance with Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule
requirements (CERR), Tennessee compiles a statewide emissions inventory
for point sources on an annual basis. On-road mobile emissions of VOC
and NOX were estimated using MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle
emissions factor computer model. Non-road mobile emissions data were
derived using the U.S. EPA's NONROAD 2008 model. ALM emissions were
primarily estimated based on EPA's National Emissions Inventory.
In projecting data for the maintenance year 2018 emissions
inventories, Tennessee used several methods to project data from the
base year 2007 to the interim years 2010, 2014, and 2018. These
projected inventories were developed using EPA-approved technologies
and methodologies including the Southeastern Emissions Modeling,
Analysis, and Planning methodology. Projected point, area, and non-road
mobile source inventories were developed using the 2007 base year
inventories and economic growth
[[Page 62356]]
factors from EPA's Economic Growth and Analysis System.
The following tables provide VOC and NOX emissions data
for the 2007 base attainment year inventories, as well as projected VOC
and NOX emissions inventory data for 2010, 2014, and 2018.
The Phase 1 Rule provides that the 10-year maintenance period begin as
of the effective date of designation for the 1997 8-hour NAAQS for the
Area. The designations for the 13 EAC attainment areas (of which
Nashville was one) were effective in April 2008 so the maintenance
period must end no earlier than 2018.
Table 1--2007 VOC and NOX Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Nashville Area
[Tons/day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
County Point Area Onroad Nonroad ALM Total *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--NOX emissions--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Davidson.......................... 11.52 0.62 45.70 9.57 3.35 70.76
Rutherford........................ 0.33 2.79 17.29 5.45 1.26 27.11
Sumner............................ 18.74 0.24 6.07 2.57 0.78 28.41
Williamson........................ 0.06 0.86 12.60 3.58 1.36 18.47
Wilson............................ 0.00 1.23 13.12 2.19 0.15 16.68
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total *....................... 30.65 5.75 94.79 23.36 6.90 161.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
County Point Area Onroad Nonroad ALM Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--VOC emissions--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Davidson.......................... 5.05 20.98 17.73 15.06 0.60 59.42
Rutherford........................ 5.97 11.02 6.65 4.44 0.20 28.28
Sumner............................ 0.97 6.78 3.53 2.68 0.08 14.05
Williamson........................ 0.31 6.00 5.05 2.64 0.07 14.06
Wilson............................ 0.00 4.88 3.32 4.80 0.05 13.04
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total *....................... 12.31 49.66 36.27 29.62 1.00 128.85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Due to conventional rounding rules, emission totals listed in Tables 1 and 2 may not reflect the absolute
mathematical totals.
Table 2--Projected VOC and NOX Emissions Inventory for the Nashville Area
[Tons/day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source type 2007 2010 2014 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--NOX emissions--
---------------------------------------------------
Point....................................................... 30.65 30.33 31.59 31.61
Area........................................................ 5.75 5.88 6.07 6.25
Onroad...................................................... 94.79 76.72 55.79 28.53
Nonroad..................................................... 23.36 21.08 16.38 12.37
ALM......................................................... 6.90 6.93 7.12 7.36
---------------------------------------------------
Total *................................................. 161.44 140.93 116.95 86.11
---------------------------------------------------
--VOC emissions--
---------------------------------------------------
Point....................................................... 12.31 12.49 13.18 14.50
Area........................................................ 49.66 51.48 54.14 57.77
Onroad...................................................... 36.27 30.43 22.13 14.84
Nonroad..................................................... 29.62 25.87 20.27 16.70
ALM......................................................... 1.00 1.07 1.17 1.27
---------------------------------------------------
Total *................................................. 128.85 121.34 110.88 105.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Due to conventional rounding rules, emission totals listed in Tables 1 and 2 may not reflect the absolute
mathematical totals.
As shown in Table 2 above, the Nashville Area is projected to
steadily decrease its total VOC and NOX emissions from the
base year of 2007 to the maintenance year of 2018. This VOC and
NOX emission decrease demonstrates continued attainment/
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for ten years from 2008
(i.e., the year the Area was effectively designated attainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS) as required by the CAA and Phase 1 Rule.
NOX and VOC emissions are expected to decrease approximately
47 and 18 percent, respectively, from the attainment base year to 2018.
These projected reductions of ozone precursors ensure continued
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
The attainment inventories submitted by Tennessee for this Area are
consistent with the criteria as discussed in the Wegman Memorandum. EPA
finds that the future emission levels for the projected years 2010,
2014, and 2018, are expected to be less than the attainment level
emissions in 2007. In
[[Page 62357]]
the event that future 1997 8-hour ozone monitoring values in the Area
are found to violate the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the contingency plan
section of the Area's maintenance plan includes measures that will be
promptly implemented to ensure that the Area returns to maintenance of
the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Please see section (d) Contingency Plan, below,
for additional information related to the contingency measures in the
maintenance plan.
(b) Maintenance Demonstration. The primary purpose of a maintenance
plan is to demonstrate how an area will continue to remain in
attainment with the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the 10-year period
following the effective date of designation as unclassifiable/
attainment. The required end projection year for the Nashville Area is
2018. As discussed in section (a) Attainment Inventory above, Tennessee
identified the level of ozone-forming emissions that were consistent
with attainment of the NAAQS for ozone in 2007. Tennessee projected VOC
and NOX emissions for 2010, 2014, and 2018. EPA finds that
the future emissions levels in these years are expected to be below the
emissions levels in 2007 in the Nashville Area.
Tennessee's SIP revision for the maintenance plan for the Nashville
Area also relies on the closure of large parts of the operations of
E.I. du Pont Nemours and Company located in Davidson County resulting
in significant reductions of both VOC and NOX. The Nashville
Attainment Area is also benefiting from the following reductions that
are occurring in other states in the Southeast: (1) North Carolina
Clean Smokestacks Act, (2) Atlanta/Northern Kentucky/Birmingham 1-hour
SIPs, (3) NOX reasonably available control technology in
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area SIP, and (4) implementation of
NOX SIP Call Phase 1 in southeastern states. Moreover,
despite the legal status of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) as
remanded, many facilities have already installed or are continuing with
plans to install emission controls that may benefit the Nashville Area.
(c) Consideration of CAIR. The NOX SIP Call requires
states to make significant, specific emissions reductions. It also
provided a mechanism, the NOX Budget Trading Program, which
states could use to achieve those reductions. When EPA promulgated
CAIR, it discontinued (starting in 2009) the NOX Budget
Trading Program, 40 CFR 51.121(r), but created another mechanism--the
CAIR ozone season trading program--which states could use to meet their
SIP Call obligations (70 FR 25289-90). EPA notes that a number of
states, when submitting SIP revisions to require sources to participate
in the CAIR ozone season trading program, removed the SIP provisions
that required sources to participate in the NOX Budget
Trading Program. In addition, because the provisions of CAIR, including
the ozone season NOX trading program, remain in place during
the remand (North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (DC Cir. 2008)), EPA
is not currently administering the NOX Budget Trading
Program. Nonetheless, all states, regardless of the current status of
their regulations that previously required participation in the
NOX Budget Trading Program, will remain subject to all of
the requirements in the NOX SIP Call, even if the existing
CAIR ozone season trading program is withdrawn or altered. In addition,
the anti-backsliding provisions of 40 CFR 51.905(f) specifically
provide that the provisions of the NOX SIP Call, including
the statewide NOX emission budgets, continue to apply after
revocation of the 1-hour standards.
All NOX SIP Call states have SIPs that currently satisfy
their obligations under the SIP Call, the SIP Call reduction
requirements are being met, and EPA will continue to enforce the
requirements of the NOX SIP Call even after any response to
the CAIR remand. For these reasons, EPA believes that regardless of the
status of the CAIR program, the NOX SIP call requirements
can be relied upon in demonstrating maintenance.
(d) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring. The table below shows design
values \1\ for the Nashville Area. The ambient ozone monitoring data
were collected at sites that were selected with assistance from EPA and
are considered representative of the areas of highest concentration.
The State of Tennessee and Metro Nashville/Davidson County Pollution
Control Division Office will continue to conduct ambient air quality
monitoring programs for ozone in their respective areas. All monitoring
programs will continue in accordance with applicable EPA monitoring
requirements contained in 40 CFR part 58. Any modification to the
ambient air monitoring network will be accomplished through close
consultation with EPA. The Nashville Area has not had a monitor design
value that exceeded the 1997 8-hour NAAQS since the 2001-2003 design
value time-period as seen in Table 3.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The air quality design value at a monitoring site is defined
as the concentration that when reduced to the level of the standard
ensures that the site meets the standard. For a concentration-based
standard, the air quality design value is simply the standard-
related test statistic. Thus, for the primary and secondary 1997 8-
hour ozone standards, the 3-year average annual forth-highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is also the air quality
design value for the site. 40 CFR part 50, appendix I, section 3.
\2\ Under EPA regulations found at 40 CFR part 50, the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS are attained when the 3-year average of the annual
fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour ambient air quality ozone
concentrations is less than 0.08 parts per million (i.e., 0.084 when
rounding is considered).
Table 3--Maximum 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
[Parts per million]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years Design value
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994-1996........................................... 0.099
1995-1997........................................... 0.099
1996-1998........................................... 0.101
1997-1999........................................... 0.102
1998-2000........................................... 0.100
1999-2001........................................... 0.093
2000-2002........................................... 0.088
2001-2003........................................... 0.086
2002-2004........................................... 0.083
2003-2005........................................... 0.082
2004-2006........................................... 0.083
2005-2007........................................... 0.084
2006-2008........................................... 0.084
2007-2009........................................... 0.078
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The maximum design value for 2007 through 2009 identified in Table
3 demonstrate attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at a level of
0.079 parts per million (ppm). Further, these design values indicate
that the Nashville maintenance Area is expected to continue attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on a gradual decrease in the
design values. The attainment level for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards
is 0.080 ppm, effectively 0.084 ppm with the rounding convention. In
the event that a design value for the Nashville Area monitors exceed
the 1997 8-hour ozone standards, one or more contingency measures
included in Tennessee's maintenance plan would be promptly implemented
in accordance with the contingency plan, as discussed below.
(e) Contingency Plan. In accordance with 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4)(ii)
and the Wegman Memorandum, the Section 110(a)(1) maintenance plan
includes contingency provisions to promptly correct a violation of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS that may occur. The state of Tennessee has
established two triggers to activate contingency measures including:
(1) Quality assured ambient air quality monitoring data showing a
violation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at any monitor, and (2) an
increase in the actual ozone precursor emissions of at least ten
[[Page 62358]]
percent over the 2007 emissions inventory. In the maintenance plan, if
contingency measures are triggered, the State of Tennessee and Metro
Nashville/Davidson County Pollution Control Division Office are
committed to implement the measures as expeditiously as practicable,
including adopting one or more contingency measures as expeditiously as
practical and implementing the measures within twenty-four months of
the triggering event. The contingency measures include: (1) Expansion
of NOX and/or VOC control strategies in the Nashville
Maintenance Area; (2) in conjunction with the State of Tennessee,
implementation of mobile source transportation controls such as reduced
speed limits for heavy duty diesel vehicles; (3) lowering major source
thresholds; (4) expansion of the open burning ban in Davidson County to
include homeowners in the area; (5) implementation of anti-idling
legislation; and/or (6) any other control measure determined to be
appropriate at the time a trigger is exceeded.
These contingency measures and schedules for implementation satisfy
EPA's long-standing guidance on the requirements of section 110(a)(1)
of continued attainment. Continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Nashville Area will depend, in part, on the air quality
measures discussed previously (see section II). In addition, the State
of Tennessee and Metro Nashville/Davidson County Pollution Control
Division Office commit to verify the 1997 8-hour ozone status in this
maintenance plan through periodic ozone precursor emission inventory
updates. Emission inventory updates will be completed by 18 months
following the end of the inventory year to verify continued attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
III. Proposed Action
Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, EPA is proposing to
approve the maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards
in the Nashville Area, submitted by the State of Tennessee, through
TDEC, on August 3, 2010. The maintenance plan ensures continued
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the maintenance year
2018. EPA has evaluated Tennessee's submittal and has preliminarily
determined that it meets the applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA
regulations, and is consistent with EPA policy.
On March 12, 2008, EPA issued revised ozone NAAQS. On September 16,
2009, EPA announced it would reconsider the 2008 NAAQS for ozone and
proposed a new schedule for designations for the reconsidered NAAQS.
The current action, however, is being taken to address requirements
under the 1997 8-hour ozone standards. Requirements for the Nashville
Area under the 2010 reconsidered ozone NAAQS will be addressed in the
future.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 28, 2010.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2010-25448 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P