Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600 Series Airplanes, Model A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes, Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes, and Model A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes), 61975-61977 [2010-25017]
Download as PDF
61975
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 194
Thursday, October 7, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0644; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–204–AD; Amendment
39–16466; AD 2010–21–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B4–600 Series Airplanes, Model
A300 B4–600R Series Airplanes, Model
A300 C4–605R Variant F Airplanes, and
Model A300 F4–600R Series Airplanes
(Collectively Called A300–600 Series
Airplanes)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of November 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38061).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Within the framework of the A300–600
aircraft Service Life Extension programme
(42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the
junction of frame bases at FR48, FR49 and
FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the
aircraft to reach the Extended Service Goal
(ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the fuselage.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires the reinforcement of the affected
junction of frame bases.
Within the framework of the A300–600
aircraft Service Life Extension programme
(42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the
junction of frame bases at FR48, FR49 and
FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the
aircraft to reach the Extended Service Goal
(ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the fuselage.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 12, 2010.
Required actions include doing a
dimensional measurement of the holes,
and doing corrective actions if
necessary; doing an eddy current
inspection of the holes for cracking, and
doing corrective actions if necessary;
and doing cold expansion of the holes
and installing fasteners. Corrective
actions include contacting Airbus for
repair instructions and doing the repair.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received. The
commenter supports the NPRM.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Oct 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Change to Compliance Time Specified
in Paragraph (h) of This AD
We have revised paragraph (h) of this
AD by adding the compliance time
‘‘within 100 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD’’ to the sentence
ending with ‘‘accomplish those
instructions.’’ We have evaluated the
data and determined that adding this
compliance time will not adversely
affect safety.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the change described previously.
We determined that this change will not
increase the economic burden on any
operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
122 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 81 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $12,300
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$2,340,570, or $19,185 per product.
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
61976
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Oct 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–21–06 Airbus: Amendment 39–16466.
Docket No. FAA–2010–0644; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–204–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective November 12, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300
B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R,
and B4–622R airplanes; Model A300 C4–
605R Variant F airplanes; and Model A300
F4–605R and F4–622R airplanes; certificated
in any category; on which modification
12699 has not been completed.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Within the framework of the A300–600
aircraft Service Life Extension programme
(42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the
junction of frame bases at FR48, FR49 and
FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the
aircraft to reach the Extended Service Goal
(ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the fuselage.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Except for airplanes identified in
paragraph (h) of this AD: At the time
specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD, as applicable, reinforce the junctions of
frame bases FR48, FR49, FR51, FR52 and
FR53, which includes doing a dimensional
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
measurement of the holes, doing an eddy
current inspection of the holes for cracking,
doing a cold expansion of the holes,
installing fasteners, and doing applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–6161,
Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009. If
cracking is found, before further flight,
contact Airbus for repair instructions and do
the repair.
(1) For airplanes on which Airbus
Modification No. 03986 has been
accomplished as of the effective date of this
AD: Before the accumulation of 37,600 total
flight cycles.
(2) For airplanes on which Airbus
Modification No. 03986 has not been
accomplished as of the effective date of this
AD: Before the accumulation of 28,900 total
flight cycles.
(h) For airplanes modified prior to the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–6161,
dated February 13, 2009; or Revision 01,
dated June 24, 2009: Within 10 days after the
effective date of this AD, prior to doing any
cold working process, determine if an eddy
current inspection for cracking has been
done, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–6161,
Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009. If the
eddy current inspection has not been done,
or it cannot be proven that it has been done,
contact Airbus for instructions and
accomplish those instructions within 100
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Related Information
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–200B,
and 747–200F Series Airplanes
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009–0188,
dated August 26, 2009; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–6161,
Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009; for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–53–6161, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated October 16,
2009 to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS—EAW
(Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.
html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 23, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–25017 Filed 10–6–10; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0552; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–095–AD; Amendment
39–16464; AD 2010–21–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding two
existing airworthiness directives (ADs),
which apply to certain Model 747–100,
747–200B, and 747–200F series
airplanes. The existing ADs currently
require inspections to detect fatiguerelated skin cracks and corrosion of the
skin panel lap joints in the fuselage
upper lobe, and repair if necessary. One
of the existing ADs, AD 94–12–09, also
requires modification of certain lap
joints and inspection of modified lap
joints. The other AD, AD 90–15–06,
requires repetitive detailed external
visual inspections of the fuselage skin at
the upper lobe skin lap joints for cracks
and evidence of corrosion, and related
investigative and corrective actions.
This AD reduces the maximum interval
of the post-modification inspections,
and adds post-repair inspection
requirements for certain airplanes. This
AD results from reports of cracking on
modified airplanes. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking and corrosion in the fuselage
upper lobe skin lap joints, which could
lead to rapid decompression of the
airplane and inability of the structure to
carry fail-safe loads.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 12, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of November 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Oct 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61977
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6437;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that
supersedes AD 90–15–06, Amendment
39–6653 (55 FR 28600, July 12, 1990),
and AD 94–12–09, Amendment 39–8937
(59 FR 30285, June 13, 1994). The
existing ADs apply to certain Model
747–100, 747–200B, and 747–200F
series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35356). That
NPRM proposed to continue to require
inspections to detect fatigue-related skin
cracks and corrosion of the skin panel
lap joints in the fuselage upper lobe,
and repair if necessary; modification of
certain lap joints and inspection of
modified lap joints; and repetitive
detailed external visual inspections of
the fuselage skin at the upper lobe skin
lap joints for cracks and evidence of
corrosion, and related investigative and
corrective actions. That NPRM also
proposed to reduce the maximum
interval of the post-modification
inspections, and adds post-repair
inspection requirements for certain
airplanes.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comment that has been
received on the NPRM.
Request to Correct Typographical Error
in Paragraph (l) of the NPRM
Boeing requests that we revise
paragraph (l) of the NPRM to change the
numeral ‘‘1’’ to the letter ‘‘l’’ to correctly
identify the paragraph references.
We agree and have corrected the
typographical error accordingly.
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61975-61977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25017]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 61975]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0644; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-204-AD;
Amendment 39-16466; AD 2010-21-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600 Series
Airplanes, Model A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes, Model A300 C4-605R
Variant F Airplanes, and Model A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes
(Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life
Extension programme (42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at
FR48, FR49 and FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to
reach the Extended Service Goal (ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 12, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 12,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR
38061). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life
Extension programme (42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at
FR48, FR49 and FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to
reach the Extended Service Goal (ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
reinforcement of the affected junction of frame bases.
Required actions include doing a dimensional measurement of the holes,
and doing corrective actions if necessary; doing an eddy current
inspection of the holes for cracking, and doing corrective actions if
necessary; and doing cold expansion of the holes and installing
fasteners. Corrective actions include contacting Airbus for repair
instructions and doing the repair. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. The commenter supports the
NPRM.
Change to Compliance Time Specified in Paragraph (h) of This AD
We have revised paragraph (h) of this AD by adding the compliance
time ``within 100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD''
to the sentence ending with ``accomplish those instructions.'' We have
evaluated the data and determined that adding this compliance time will
not adversely affect safety.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously. We determined that this
change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 122 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 81 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $12,300 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $2,340,570, or $19,185 per product.
[[Page 61976]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-21-06 Airbus: Amendment 39-16466. Docket No. FAA-2010-0644;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-204-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
12, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620,
B4-622, B4-605R, and B4-622R airplanes; Model A300 C4-605R Variant F
airplanes; and Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes;
certificated in any category; on which modification 12699 has not
been completed.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life
Extension programme (42,500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been
concluded that a reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at
FR48, FR49 and FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to
reach the Extended Service Goal (ESG).
* * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Except for airplanes identified in paragraph (h) of this AD:
At the time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, reinforce the junctions of frame bases FR48, FR49, FR51,
FR52 and FR53, which includes doing a dimensional measurement of the
holes, doing an eddy current inspection of the holes for cracking,
doing a cold expansion of the holes, installing fasteners, and doing
applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161,
Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009. If cracking is found, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(1) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification No. 03986 has
been accomplished as of the effective date of this AD: Before the
accumulation of 37,600 total flight cycles.
(2) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification No. 03986 has not
been accomplished as of the effective date of this AD: Before the
accumulation of 28,900 total flight cycles.
(h) For airplanes modified prior to the effective date of this
AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, dated February 13, 2009; or
Revision 01, dated June 24, 2009: Within 10 days after the effective
date of this AD, prior to doing any cold working process, determine
if an eddy current inspection for cracking has been done, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009.
If the eddy current inspection has not been done, or it cannot be
proven that it has been done, contact Airbus for instructions and
accomplish those instructions within 100 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated
[[Page 61977]]
agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before
it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2009-0188, dated August 26, 2009; and Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009;
for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161,
Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated October 16, 2009 to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 23, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-25017 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P