Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 61617-61618 [2010-25139]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
substances in those instances where I
have expressly directed the agent to do
so and where I have specified to the
agent the required elements of the
prescription (set forth in 21 CFR
1306.05) and I have signed the
prescription.
This authorization is not subject to
further delegation to other persons. Both
the undersigned DEA-registered
individual practitioner and the
undersigned agent understand and agree
that the practitioner is solely
responsible for making all medical
determinations relating to prescriptions
for controlled substances communicated
by the agent pursuant to this agreement,
and for ensuring that all such
prescriptions conform in all other
essential respects to the law and
regulations.
The undersigned agent understands he
or she does not have authority to make
any medical determinations. The
undersigned DEA-registered prescribing
practitioner further understands that the
prescribing practitioner must personally
communicate all Schedule II emergency
oral prescriptions to the pharmacist.
Both the undersigned practitioner and
agent understand that the agent may not
call in an emergency oral prescription
for a Schedule II controlled substance
on behalf of the practitioner.
This agency agreement shall be
terminated immediately if and when
any of the following occur:
1. The undersigned practitioner no
longer possesses the active DEA
registration specified in this agreement.
2. The undersigned agent is no longer
employed in the manner described in
this agreement.
3. The practitioner or the agent
revokes this agency agreement by
completing the revocation section at the
end of this document or by executing a
written document that is substantially
similar to the revocation section at the
end of this document.
llllllllllllllllll
l
(Signature of practitioner)
I, llllllll (name of agent),
hereby affirm that I am the person
named herein as agent and that the
signature affixed hereto is my signature.
I further affirm that I am a lll____
(title), licensed in the State of lll,
(where applicable) and (if applicable)
am employed by/under contract with
llllllll (name of employer or
contracting entity). I agree to abide by
all the terms of this agreement and to
comply with all applicable laws and
regulations relating to controlled
substances.
llllllllllllllllll
l
(Signature of agent)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
llllllllllllllllll
l
(State license number of agent where
applicable)
llllllllllllllllll
l
(Name of employer/contracting entity
where applicable)
llllllllllllllllll
l
(Address of employer/contracting entity
where applicable)
Witnesses:
1.llllllllll
2.llllllllll
Signed and dated on the llll day
of llllll (month) llllll,
(year), at llllllll.
Revocation
The foregoing agency agreement is
hereby revoked by the undersigned. The
agent is no longer authorized to
communicate Schedule II, III, IV and V
controlled substance prescriptions to a
pharmacy on my behalf. A copy of this
revocation has been given to the agent
this same day.
llllllllllllllllll
l
(Signature of registered practitioner
revoking power)
Witnesses:
1. llllllllll
2. llllllllll
Signed and dated on the llllday of
llllll(month)llll, (year), at
llllllll.
DEA recommends that the original
signed agency agreement be kept by the
practitioner during the term of the
agency relationship and for a reasonable
period after termination or revocation.
DEA requires that inventory and other
records be kept for at least two years (21
U.S.C. 827(b), 21 U.S.C. 828(c), 21 CFR
1304.04). This is simply a suggested
time period for retention of agency
agreements and is not required by DEA.
A signed copy should also be provided
to the practitioner’s designated agent,
the agent’s employer (if other than the
practitioner), and any pharmacies that
regularly receive communications from
the agent pursuant to the agreement.
Providing a copy to pharmacies likely to
receive prescriptions from the agent on
the practitioner’s behalf may assist those
pharmacies with their corresponding
responsibility regarding the dispensing
of controlled substances. It is important
to reiterate that a pharmacist always has
a corresponding responsibility to ensure
that a controlled substance prescription
conforms with the law and regulations,
including the requirement that the
prescription be issued for a legitimate
medical purpose by a practitioner acting
in the usual course of professional
practice, and a corresponding liability if
a prescription is not prepared or
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61617
dispensed in a manner consistent with
the CSA or DEA regulations. Even
where the pharmacist has a copy of an
agency agreement, the pharmacist may
also have a duty to inquire further
depending upon the particular
circumstances. Because the agency
agreement may be revoked at any time
by the practitioner or by the agent, the
party terminating the agreement should
notify the other party immediately upon
termination. The practitioner should
notify those pharmacies that were
originally made aware of the agency
agreement of the termination of that
agreement. In most circumstances where
an agent changes employment, the
agreement should be revoked.
Dated: October 1, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control.
[FR Doc. 2010–25136 Filed 10–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 323
[Docket ID DOD–2010–OS–0139]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Defense Logistics Agency; DoD.
Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Defense Logistics Agency
is revising two exemption rules. The
exemption rule for S100.10 entitled
‘‘Whistleblower Complaint and
Investigative Files’’ is being deleted in
its entirety and the exemption rule
system identifier for the ‘‘Incident
Investigation/Police Inquiry Files’’
system of records is being revised.
DATES: The rule will be effective on
December 6, 2010, unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination.
Comments will be accepted on or
before December 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
61618
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Jody Sinkler at (703) 767–5045.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 323—DEFENSE OGISTICS
AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 323 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a).
2. In Appendix H to part 323:
a. Paragraph ‘‘d.’’ is removed and
reserved.
■ b. Paragraph ‘‘f.’’ introductory text is
revised to read as follows:
■
■
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
Mrs.
Miriam Brown-Lam at (202) 685–6545.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
32 CFR Part 701
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
[Docket ID USN–2010–0036]
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rulemaking for the Department of
Defense does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Appendix H to Part 323—DLA
Exemption Rules
f. ID S500.30 (Specific exemption)
Dated: October 1, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010–25139 Filed 10–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Navy
is revising an exemption rule. More
specifically, the exemption rule for
N03834–1 entitled ‘‘Special Intelligence
Personnel Access File’’ is being deleted
in its entirety.
DATES: The rule will be effective on
December 6, 2010, unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination.
Comments will be accepted on or
before December 6, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61617-61618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25139]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 323
[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0139]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency; DoD.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency is revising two exemption rules.
The exemption rule for S100.10 entitled ``Whistleblower Complaint and
Investigative Files'' is being deleted in its entirety and the
exemption rule system identifier for the ``Incident Investigation/
Police Inquiry Files'' system of records is being revised.
DATES: The rule will be effective on December 6, 2010, unless comments
are received that would result in a contrary determination.
Comments will be accepted on or before December 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy
[[Page 61618]]
for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to
make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323 Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is amended as follows:
PART 323--DEFENSE OGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 323 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. In Appendix H to part 323:
0
a. Paragraph ``d.'' is removed and reserved.
0
b. Paragraph ``f.'' introductory text is revised to read as follows:
Appendix H to Part 323--DLA Exemption Rules
f. ID S500.30 (Specific exemption)
Dated: October 1, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-25139 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P