Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Solar Photovoltaic Panel Systems, 61509-61511 [2010-25024]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 5, 2010 / Notices
68). This request for comment is being
made pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13;
44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)).
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before December 6, 2010,
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Attn: Tracey Denning, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
799 9th Street, NW., 5th Floor,
Washington, DC 20229–1177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 799 9th Street,
NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC.
20229–1177, at 202–325–0265.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13;
44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments
should address: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e) the
annual costs burden to respondents or
record keepers from the collection of
information (a total capital/startup costs
and operations and maintenance costs).
The comments that are submitted will
be summarized and included in the CBP
request for Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record.
In this document CBP is soliciting
comments concerning the following
information collection:
Title: Canadian Border Boat Landing
Permit.
OMB Number: 1651–0108.
Form Number: CBP Form I–68.
Abstract: The Canadian Border Boat
Landing Permit (CBP Form I–68) allows
participants entering the United States
along the northern border by small
pleasure boats less than 5 tons to
telephonically report their arrival
without having to appear in person for
an inspection by a CBP officer. United
States citizens, Lawful Permanent
Residents of the United States, Canadian
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 Oct 04, 2010
Jkt 223001
citizens, Landed Commonwealth
Residents of Canada, and Landed
Residents of Canada who are nationals
of Visa Waiver Program countries listed
in 8 CFR 217.2(a) are eligible to
participate.
The information collected on Form I–
68 allows people who enter the United
States from Canada by small pleasure
boats to be inspected only once during
the boating season, rather than each
time they make an entry. This
information collection is provided for
by 8 CFR 235.1(e) and Section 235 of
Immigration and Nationality Act. CBP
Form I–68 is accessible at https://
forms.cbp.gov/pdf/CBP_Form_I68.pdf.
Current Actions: This submission is
being made to extend the expiration
date with no change to the burden
hours.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
68,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 10
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 11,288.
Estimated Annual Cost: $1,088,000.
Dated: September 30, 2010.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2010–25027 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Solar
Photovoltaic Panel Systems
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain solar photovoltaic
systems which may be offered to the
United States Government under a
government procurement contract.
Based upon the facts presented, in the
final determination CBP concluded that
the U.S. is the country of origin of the
solar photovoltaic systems for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on September 29, 2010. A copy
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61509
of the final determination is attached.
Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19
CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review
of this final determination on or before
November 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202–325–0041).
Notice is
hereby given that on September 29,
2010, pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain solar photovoltaic
systems which may be offered to the
United States Government under a
government procurement contract. This
final determination, in HQ H095409 was
issued at the request of Solyndra, Inc.
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR
part 177, subpart B, which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18).
In the final determination, CBP
concluded that, based upon the facts
presented, certain articles will be
substantially transformed in the U.S.
Therefore, CBP found that the U.S. is
the country of origin of the finished
articles for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 29, 2010.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
HQ H095409
September 29, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS H095409 KSG
Joshua Holzer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, 1700 K Street NW, Fifth Floor,
Washington, D.C. 20006–3817
Re: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III,
Trade Agreements Act of 1979; Country of
Origin of solar photovoltaic panel system;
substantial transformation
Dear Mr. Holzer:
This is in response to your letter, dated
February 17, 2010, requesting a final
determination on behalf of Solyndra, Inc.,
pursuant to subpart B of 19 CFR Part 177.
Your submission of August 4, 2010, was
considered as part of the file.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
61510
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 5, 2010 / Notices
Under these regulations, which implement
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.) (‘‘TAA’’),
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice
for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of certain photovoltaic
panel systems that Solyndra may sell to the
U.S. Government. We note that Solyndra is
a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19
CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
Facts:
The photovoltaic panels convert sunlight
on low-slope commercial rooftops into
electricity. The solar photovoltaic (‘‘PV’’)
panel systems contain both U.S. and foreignorigin raw materials and components. The
following components are of U.S. origin:
Ammonium hydroxide, an optical coupling
agent, the middle tube, the outer tube, a frit,
a gas bag, grease, a frame adhesive, wire
harnesses, and the label nameplate.
The following raw materials are from
foreign sources (Austria, Japan, the
Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Belgium,
and Switzerland): Molybdenum, copper,
indium, gallium, selenium, cadmium sulfide,
hydrochloric acid, and transparent
conductive oxide. The manufactured
components, which are produced in
Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, Malaysia,
Belgium, and China, are: An inner glass tube,
an outer cap, an assembled pin, an inner
contact, harness adhesive, beam, frames,
universal, welded aluminum mounts, panel
mount screw, lateral clip, grounding strap
assembly, and a grounding strap screw.
Solyndra has a manufacturing facility in
California where both a front end process and
a back end process are performed, which
takes approximately six and one half days to
complete. Solyndra also conducts all its
research and development for its product in
the U.S. The front end process converts bare
glass tubes into functional PV cells. The back
end process encapsulates these tubes in a
glass outer tube, isolating the active material
from the environment by a true hermetic seal.
The last step in the back end process is to
assemble these finished modules onto a
panel frame, resulting in a solar panel ready
for rooftop installation.
The front end process includes five steps
which turn a raw glass tube into a component
for a PV system. The five steps are as follows:
(1) Bare glass tubes are cleaned using
standard ultra-sonic bath and surfactant
technology.
(2) Quality assurance testing is conducted
using precisely calibrated machinery.
(3) Using Solyndra’s proprietary in-line
vacuum systems and physical vapor
deposition and evaporation techniques,
several layers of different thin films of
molybdenum, copper, indium, gallium, and
selenium, are deposited on the glass tube.
(4) The glass tubes are immersed into a
precise chemical mixture, at a controlled
temperature and Cadmium Sulfide is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 Oct 04, 2010
Jkt 223001
deposited onto the glass at a controlled
thickness.
(5) Using either lasers or mechanical
scribes to define solar cells and interconnect
them, the deposited films are precisely
patterned to increase the solar collection
efficiency of the glass tubes.
The back end process, which includes
eight steps described below, subjects the
treated glass tubes to additional processes to
create finished modules that protect the solar
cells from degradation over their 25-year
service life in a rooftop installation. The
Modules are then assembled into panels and
combined with mounts, cable management
components, and mounting hardware,
resulting in a finished PV system. The eight
steps are as folllows:
(1) The processed glass tubes are
encapsulated in a plastic middle tube and a
glass outer tube, creating a Module.
(2) Metal connectors are placed at each end
of the Module to enable the Module to float
in the completed PV System.
(3) Through a complex process that
involves melting glass and metal together, the
ends of each Module are covered with a
stainless steel cap, creating a hermetic seal.
(4) After removing water and air from the
Module, an optical coupling agent is used to
fill the space between the inner and outer
glass tubes and a plug is placed at the end
of the Module to complete the sealing
process.
(5) The plug is laser welded in place, and
the weld is inspected for defects.
(6) Using a mass spectrometer based
Helium leak detection system, each Module
is checked for leaks.
(7) The approved Modules are then
subjected to artificial sunlight and tested to
determine the level of electricity being
produced.
(8) Based on their performance, tubes are
grouped in sets of 40 to make each solar
panel.
Forty (40) finished Modules are pressed
into each panel frame. Solyndra’s customized
mounts and mounting hardware are added to
each panel to create a complete PV system,
ready for rooftop installation.
Issue:
What is the country of origin of the solar
PV panel system described above for the
purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Law and Analysis:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR
§ 177.21 et seq., which implements Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes
of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice
for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
The rule of origin set forth in 19 U.S.C.
§ 2518(4)(B) states:
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed. See also
19 CFR § 177.22(a) defining ‘‘country of
origin’’ in identical terms.
In rendering advisory rulings and final
determinations for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of Subpart B of Part 177 consistent
with the Federal Procurement Regulations.
See 19 CFR § 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Procurement
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s
purchase of products to U.S.-made or
designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
§ 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Procurement
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’
as: * * * an article that is mined, produced,
or manufactured in the United States or that
is substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed. 48 CFR
§ 25.003. Therefore, the question presented in
this final determination is whether, as a
result of the operations performed in the
United States, the foreign materials and
components are substantially transformed
into a product of the United States.
In determining whether the combining of
parts or materials constitutes a substantial
transformation, the determinative issue is the
extent of the operations performed and
whether the parts lose their identity and
become an integral part of the new article.
Belcrest Linens v. United States, 6 Ct. Int’l
Trade 204, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (1983), aff’d,
741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). If the
manufacturing or combining process is a
minor one that leaves the identity of the
imported article intact, a substantial
transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal,
Inc. v. United States, 3 Ct. Int’l Trade 220,
542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982). Assembly
operations that are minimal or simple, as
opposed to complex or meaningful, generally
will not result in a substantial
transformation. See C.S.D. 80–111, C.S.D. 85–
25, C.S.D. 89–110, C.S.D. 89–118, C.S.D. 90–
51, and C.S.D. 90–97.
In order to determine whether a substantial
transformation occurs when components of
various origins are assembled to form
completed articles, CBP considers the totality
of the circumstances and makes such
decisions on a case-by-case basis. The
country of origin of the article’s components,
the extent of the processing that occurs
within a given country, and whether such
processing renders a product with a new
name, character, and use are primary
considerations in such cases. Additionally,
resources expended on product design and
development, the extent and nature of postassembly inspection procedures, and the
worker skill required during the actual
manufacturing process will be considered
when analyzing whether a substantial
transformation has occurred; however, no
one factor is determinative.
In this case, the solar PV systems are
produced in a production facility located in
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 5, 2010 / Notices
the U.S. All the research and development
for the solar PV panel system is performed
in the U.S. A significant number of the
components used to make these products are
of U.S.-origin. Further, this case clearly
involves complex and meaningful assembly
operations performed in the U.S. Several
layers of thin film deposits are placed on the
bare glass tubes which are then transformed
into a module for a solar PV panel system
with a new name, different and specialized
characteristics and use. Therefore, we find
that the imported components are
substantially transformed in the U.S. and that
the country of origin of the solar PV panel
systems is the U.S. for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
We suggest that you contact the Federal
Trade Commission to determine whether the
solar panel systems may be marked ‘‘Made in
the U.S.A.’’, which is within their
jurisdiction.
Holding:
Based on the facts of this case, the country
of origin of the solar PV panel systems is the
U.S. for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 CFR § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR § 177.31 that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR § 177.30, any party-atinterest may, within 30 days after publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010–25024 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This Compact
authorizes the Cherokee Nation of
Oklahoma to engage in off-track
wagering.
Dated: September 23, 2010.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–25005 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Compact.
ACTION:
This notice publishes an
extension of Gaming Compact between
the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and the State
of South Dakota.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: October 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This amendment
allows for the extension of the current
Tribal-State Compact until February 28,
2011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Compact.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes
approval of the State of Oklahoma
Cherokee Nation Off-Track Wagering
Compact.
DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 Oct 04, 2010
Jkt 223001
Dated: September 17, 2010.
Paul Tsosie,
Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–25003 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61511
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
Regulation and Enforcement
Intent To Prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement:
Outer Continental Shelf, Alaska OCS
Region, Chukchi Sea Planning Area,
Oil and Gas Lease Sale 193
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOEMRE), Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOEMRE) is giving notice
of its intent to publish a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and
Gas Lease Sale 193 in the Chukchi Sea
Planning Area, Alaska. This
Supplementary EIS will provide new
analysis in response to a remand by the
United States District Court for the
District of Alaska.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Deborah
Cranswick, Chief, Environmental
Analysis Section I, Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management, Regulation and
Enforcement, Alaska OCS Region, 3801
Centerpoint Drive, Suite 500,
Anchorage, Alaska 99503–5820.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Cranswick, 907–334–5267.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Authority: The NOI is published
pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR
1508.22(b)) implementing the
provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
(NEPA).
2. Purpose of Notice of Intent:
Pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR
1508.22) implementing the procedural
provisions of NEPA, the BOEMRE is
announcing its intent to prepare a
Supplemental EIS for OCS Oil and Gas
Lease Sale 193 in the Chukchi Sea
Planning Area, Alaska. The
Supplemental EIS will supplement the
analysis from the Lease Sale 193 Final
EIS (OCS EIS/EA MMS 2007–0026) by:
(1) Analyzing the environmental impact
of natural gas development; (2)
determining whether missing
information identified by BOEMRE is
relevant or essential to the
decisionmaking under 40 CFR 1502.22;
and (3) determining whether the cost of
obtaining the missing information is
exorbitant, or the means of obtaining the
information is unknown. The Final EIS
for Sale 193 evaluated the potential
effects of the proposed sale and three
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61509-61511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25024]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Solar
Photovoltaic Panel Systems
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain solar photovoltaic systems which may be
offered to the United States Government under a government procurement
contract. Based upon the facts presented, in the final determination
CBP concluded that the U.S. is the country of origin of the solar
photovoltaic systems for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on September 29, 2010. A copy
of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as
defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before November 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202-325-0041).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on September 29,
2010, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain solar photovoltaic systems which may be
offered to the United States Government under a government procurement
contract. This final determination, in HQ H095409 was issued at the
request of Solyndra, Inc. under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part
177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination,
CBP concluded that, based upon the facts presented, certain articles
will be substantially transformed in the U.S. Therefore, CBP found that
the U.S. is the country of origin of the finished articles for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: September 29, 2010.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
HQ H095409
September 29, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS H095409 KSG
Joshua Holzer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, 1700 K Street NW,
Fifth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006-3817
Re: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979; Country of Origin of solar photovoltaic panel system;
substantial transformation
Dear Mr. Holzer:
This is in response to your letter, dated February 17, 2010,
requesting a final determination on behalf of Solyndra, Inc.,
pursuant to subpart B of 19 CFR Part 177. Your submission of August
4, 2010, was considered as part of the file.
[[Page 61510]]
Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.)
(``TAA''), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of
a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of
certain photovoltaic panel systems that Solyndra may sell to the
U.S. Government. We note that Solyndra is a party-at-interest within
the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this
final determination.
Facts:
The photovoltaic panels convert sunlight on low-slope commercial
rooftops into electricity. The solar photovoltaic (``PV'') panel
systems contain both U.S. and foreign-origin raw materials and
components. The following components are of U.S. origin: Ammonium
hydroxide, an optical coupling agent, the middle tube, the outer
tube, a frit, a gas bag, grease, a frame adhesive, wire harnesses,
and the label nameplate.
The following raw materials are from foreign sources (Austria,
Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and
Switzerland): Molybdenum, copper, indium, gallium, selenium, cadmium
sulfide, hydrochloric acid, and transparent conductive oxide. The
manufactured components, which are produced in Germany, Switzerland,
Singapore, Malaysia, Belgium, and China, are: An inner glass tube,
an outer cap, an assembled pin, an inner contact, harness adhesive,
beam, frames, universal, welded aluminum mounts, panel mount screw,
lateral clip, grounding strap assembly, and a grounding strap screw.
Solyndra has a manufacturing facility in California where both a
front end process and a back end process are performed, which takes
approximately six and one half days to complete. Solyndra also
conducts all its research and development for its product in the
U.S. The front end process converts bare glass tubes into functional
PV cells. The back end process encapsulates these tubes in a glass
outer tube, isolating the active material from the environment by a
true hermetic seal. The last step in the back end process is to
assemble these finished modules onto a panel frame, resulting in a
solar panel ready for rooftop installation.
The front end process includes five steps which turn a raw glass
tube into a component for a PV system. The five steps are as
follows:
(1) Bare glass tubes are cleaned using standard ultra-sonic bath
and surfactant technology.
(2) Quality assurance testing is conducted using precisely
calibrated machinery.
(3) Using Solyndra's proprietary in-line vacuum systems and
physical vapor deposition and evaporation techniques, several layers
of different thin films of molybdenum, copper, indium, gallium, and
selenium, are deposited on the glass tube.
(4) The glass tubes are immersed into a precise chemical
mixture, at a controlled temperature and Cadmium Sulfide is
deposited onto the glass at a controlled thickness.
(5) Using either lasers or mechanical scribes to define solar
cells and interconnect them, the deposited films are precisely
patterned to increase the solar collection efficiency of the glass
tubes.
The back end process, which includes eight steps described
below, subjects the treated glass tubes to additional processes to
create finished modules that protect the solar cells from
degradation over their 25-year service life in a rooftop
installation. The Modules are then assembled into panels and
combined with mounts, cable management components, and mounting
hardware, resulting in a finished PV system. The eight steps are as
folllows:
(1) The processed glass tubes are encapsulated in a plastic
middle tube and a glass outer tube, creating a Module.
(2) Metal connectors are placed at each end of the Module to
enable the Module to float in the completed PV System.
(3) Through a complex process that involves melting glass and
metal together, the ends of each Module are covered with a stainless
steel cap, creating a hermetic seal.
(4) After removing water and air from the Module, an optical
coupling agent is used to fill the space between the inner and outer
glass tubes and a plug is placed at the end of the Module to
complete the sealing process.
(5) The plug is laser welded in place, and the weld is inspected
for defects.
(6) Using a mass spectrometer based Helium leak detection
system, each Module is checked for leaks.
(7) The approved Modules are then subjected to artificial
sunlight and tested to determine the level of electricity being
produced.
(8) Based on their performance, tubes are grouped in sets of 40
to make each solar panel.
Forty (40) finished Modules are pressed into each panel frame.
Solyndra's customized mounts and mounting hardware are added to each
panel to create a complete PV system, ready for rooftop
installation.
Issue:
What is the country of origin of the solar PV panel system
described above for the purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Law and Analysis:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR Sec. 177.21 et seq.,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
The rule of origin set forth in 19 U.S.C. Sec. 2518(4)(B)
states:
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed. See also 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(a) defining ``country of
origin'' in identical terms.
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions
of Subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement
Regulations. See 19 CFR Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Procurement Regulations restrict the U.S.
Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country
end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR Sec.
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Procurement Regulations define ``U.S.-made
end product'' as: * * * an article that is mined, produced, or
manufactured in the United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was transformed. 48 CFR Sec.
25.003. Therefore, the question presented in this final
determination is whether, as a result of the operations performed in
the United States, the foreign materials and components are
substantially transformed into a product of the United States.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of the operations performed and whether the parts lose
their identity and become an integral part of the new article.
Belcrest Linens v. United States, 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 204, 573 F.
Supp. 1149 (1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). If the
manufacturing or combining process is a minor one that leaves the
identity of the imported article intact, a substantial
transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3
Ct. Int'l Trade 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982). Assembly operations
that are minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful,
generally will not result in a substantial transformation. See
C.S.D. 80-111, C.S.D. 85-25, C.S.D. 89-110, C.S.D. 89-118, C.S.D.
90-51, and C.S.D. 90-97.
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation
occurs when components of various origins are assembled to form
completed articles, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances
and makes such decisions on a case-by-case basis. The country of
origin of the article's components, the extent of the processing
that occurs within a given country, and whether such processing
renders a product with a new name, character, and use are primary
considerations in such cases. Additionally, resources expended on
product design and development, the extent and nature of post-
assembly inspection procedures, and the worker skill required during
the actual manufacturing process will be considered when analyzing
whether a substantial transformation has occurred; however, no one
factor is determinative.
In this case, the solar PV systems are produced in a production
facility located in
[[Page 61511]]
the U.S. All the research and development for the solar PV panel
system is performed in the U.S. A significant number of the
components used to make these products are of U.S.-origin. Further,
this case clearly involves complex and meaningful assembly
operations performed in the U.S. Several layers of thin film
deposits are placed on the bare glass tubes which are then
transformed into a module for a solar PV panel system with a new
name, different and specialized characteristics and use. Therefore,
we find that the imported components are substantially transformed
in the U.S. and that the country of origin of the solar PV panel
systems is the U.S. for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
We suggest that you contact the Federal Trade Commission to
determine whether the solar panel systems may be marked ``Made in
the U.S.A.'', which is within their jurisdiction.
Holding:
Based on the facts of this case, the country of origin of the
solar PV panel systems is the U.S. for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 177.31 that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days after
publication of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek
judicial review of this final determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010-25024 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P