Notice of Entering Into a Compact With the Republic of the Philippines, 61197-61216 [2010-24820]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
IX. Other Information
OMB Information Collection No. 1225–
0086
OMB Information Collection No. 1225–
0086, Expires November 30, 2012
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of
information unless such collection
displays a valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 20 hours per response,
including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden
estimated or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to
the U.S. Department of Labor, to the
attention of: Departmental Clearance
Officer, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N–1310, Washington, DC 20210.
Comments may also be e-mailed to
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Please do
not return the completed application to
this address. Send it to the sponsoring
agency as specified in this solicitation.
This information is being collected for
the purpose of awarding a grant. The
information collected through this
‘‘Solicitation for Grant Applications’’
will be used by DOL to ensure that
grants are awarded to the applicant best
suited to perform the functions of the
grant. Submission of this information is
required in order for the applicant to be
considered for award of this grant.
Unless otherwise specifically noted in
this announcement, information
submitted in the respondent’s
application is not considered to be
confidential.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
September 2010.
Donna Kelly,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–24825 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[MCC FR 10–11]
Notice of Entering Into a Compact With
the Republic of the Philippines
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
In accordance with Section
610(b)(2) of the Millennium Challenge
Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108–199, Division
D), the Millennium Challenge
Corporation (MCC) is publishing a
summary and the complete text of the
Millennium Challenge Compact
between the United States of America,
acting through the Millennium
Challenge Corporation, and the
Republic of the Philippines.
Representatives of the United States
Government and the Republic of the
Philippines executed the Compact
documents on September 23, 2010.
SUMMARY:
Jkt 223001
Dated: September 29, 2010.
Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Summary of Millennium Challenge
Compact With the Republic of the
Philippines
The five-year Millennium Challenge
Compact with the Republic of the
Philippines (‘‘Compact’’) will provide up
to $433,910,000 million to reduce
poverty and accelerate economic
growth. The Compact is intended to
support: (i) Reforms and investments to
modernize the Bureau of Internal
Revenue to increase fiscal space for
public investment and to reduce
opportunities for corruption in tax
administration; (ii) expansion and
improvement of a community-driven
development project, Kalahi-CIDSS; and
(iii) rehabilitation of a secondary
national road in Samar province.
Revenue Administration Reform Project
($54.3 million)
The Revenue Administration Reform
Project addresses two problems: (i) the
need to raise tax revenues and (ii) the
need to reduce tax evasion and revenue
agent-related corruption. A key
constraint to economic growth in the
Philippines is the lack of fiscal space for
growth-enhancing investments in public
goods such as infrastructure and social
services (e.g., education and health).
This project will focus on the Bureau of
Internal Revenue within the Department
of Finance to increase the efficiency and
sustainability of revenue collection
through a redesign and computerization
of business processes, thereby helping
to relieve some pressure on the
Government of the Republic of the
Philippines’ (‘‘GRP’s’’) fiscal position.
This project will narrow the gap
between potential and actual collections
by reducing the discretion of individual
revenue (i.e., tax and customs)
collection officers, and help improve the
predictability and impartiality with
which revenue laws and regulations are
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61197
enforced. Some of these activities are
extensions of the Philippines’ threshold
program activities that concluded in
May 2009. The project is expected to
reach the entire Philippine population
and has an economic rate of return of 40
percent.
Kalahi-CIDSS Community Development
Project ($120.0 million)
The Kalahi-CIDSS Project will
improve welfare in rural areas by
targeting communities where poverty
incidence exceeds the national average
for small-scale, community-driven
development projects. The project does
this through the direct provision of
infrastructure and services associated
with community-selected and managed
sub-projects, strengthened community
participation in development and
governance activities at the village and
municipal level, and improved
responsiveness of local government to
community needs. The project will
build on and support the application of
the participatory planning,
implementation, and evaluation
methodology developed by GRP’s
Department of Social Welfare and
Development (DSWD) in collaboration
with the World Bank.
Grants for the community sub-projects
are provided directly to the local
communities, which are responsible for
sub-project selection, the procurement
of goods and services for their subproject, and, in most cases, the
operations and maintenance of the
physical assets. DSWD will implement
the project, overseen by a National
Steering Committee that includes
representatives from government
departments and NGOs, and in
collaboration with local governments.
Typical sub-projects will include
small-scale transportation infrastructure
such as village access roads and bridges,
school buildings, health clinics,
drinking water systems, pre-and postharvest facilities, and other economic
assets. The project is expected to benefit
over five million beneficiaries over the
next 20 years and has an estimated
economic rate of return of 13 percent.
Secondary National Roads Development
Project ($214.4 million)
The Secondary National Roads
Development Project is designed to
reduce transportation costs through the
rehabilitation of an existing 222
kilometer road segment. By bringing
about savings in vehicle operating cost
and time for both passengers and goods,
and by reducing road maintenance
costs, the investment will facilitate
increased commerce in and between the
provinces of Samar and Eastern Samar,
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61198
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
and ultimately contribute to the
Compact’s objective of increasing
incomes.
This project will incorporate
enhanced safety measures in the final
road designs, including: (i) Paved
shoulders intended to improve
conditions for vehicles and provide
space for pedestrians; (ii) construction
of sidewalks and curbs where
pedestrian activity is higher, such as
near schools and other public facilities;
(iii) improved gateway treatments to
indicate where lower speeds are
required, typically in more developed
communities and urban areas; and (iv)
increased use of road narrowing,
median islands, and traffic humps to
slow traffic speeds. The project is
expected to reach 290,000 beneficiaries
and has an economic rate of return of 14
percent.
Administration
The Compact also includes program
management and oversight costs
estimated at $36.91 million over a fiveyear time frame, including the costs of
administration, management, auditing,
and fiscal and procurement agent
services. In addition, the cost of
monitoring and evaluation of the
Compact is budgeted at approximately
$8.26 million.
Millennium Challenge Compact
Between the United States of America
Acting Through the Millennium
Challenge Corporation and the Republic
of the Philippines
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Table of Contents
Article 1. Goal and Objectives
Section 1.1 Compact Goal
Section 1.2 Program Objective
Section 1.3 Project Objectives
Article 2. Funding and Resources
Section 2.1 Program Funding
Section 2.2 Compact Implementation
Funding
Section 2.3 MCC Funding
Section 2.4 Disbursement
Section 2.5 Interest
Section 2.6 Government Resources;
Budget
Section 2.7 Limitations of the Use of MCC
Funding
Section 2.8 Taxes and Contributions
Article 3. Implementation
Section 3.1 Program Implementation
Agreement
Section 3.2 Government Responsibilities
Section 3.3 Policy Performance
Section 3.4 Government Assurances
Section 3.5 Implementation Letters
Section 3.6 Procurement
Section 3.7 Records; Accounting; Covered
Providers; Access
Section 3.8 Audits; Reviews
Article 4. Communications
Section 4.1 Communications
Section 4.2 Representatives
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Article 5. Termination; Suspension; Refunds
Section 5.1 Termination; Suspension
Section 5.2 Refunds; Violation
Section 5.3 Survival
Article 6. Compact Annexes; Amendments;
Governing Law
Section 6.1 Annexes
Section 6.2 Amendments
Section 6.3 Inconsistencies
Section 6.4 Governing Law
Section 6.5 Additional Instruments
Section 6.6 References to MCC Web site
Section 6.7 References to Laws,
Regulations, Policies, and Guidelines
Section 6.8 MCC Status
Section 6.9 Counterparts; Electronic
Delivery
Article 7. Entry Into Force
Section 7.1 Conditions Precedent to Entry
Into Force
Section 7.2 Date of Entry Into Force
Section 7.3 Compact Term
Section 7.4 Provisional Application
Article 8. Additional Government Covenants
Section 8.1 Project Covenants
Annex I: Program Description
Annex II: Multi-Year Financial Plan
Summary
Annex III: Description of the Monitoring and
Evaluation Plan
Annex IV: Conditions to Disbursement of
Compact Implementation Funding
Annex V: Definitions
Millennium Challenge Compact
Preamble
This Millennium Challenge Compact
(this ‘‘Compact’’) is between the United
States of America, acting through the
Millennium Challenge Corporation, a
United States government corporation
(‘‘MCC’’), and the Republic of the
Philippines (‘‘the Philippines’’), acting
through its government (the
‘‘Government’’), represented by its
Department of Finance.
MCC and the Government are
individually referred to in this Compact
as a ‘‘Party’’ and together, as the
‘‘Parties.’’ Capitalized terms used in this
Compact will have the meanings
specified in Annex V hereto.
Recalling that the Government
consulted with the private sector and
civil society of the Philippines to
determine the priorities for the use of
Millennium Challenge Account
assistance and developed and submitted
to MCC a proposal for such assistance
to achieve lasting economic growth and
poverty reduction; and
Recognizing that MCC wishes to help
the Philippines implement a program to
achieve the goal and objectives
described herein (the ‘‘Program’’).
The Parties agree as follows:
Article 1. Goal and Objectives
Section 1.1 Compact Goal
The goal of this Compact is to reduce
poverty through economic growth in the
Philippines (the ‘‘Compact Goal’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 1.2 Program Objective
The objective of the Program is to: (a)
Increase the incomes of Filipinos
through the benefits of communitydriven sub-projects; (b) obtain time
savings and lower transportation costs
for road users in Program areas; and (c)
increase investment and government
expenditure due to an increase in tax
revenue and a reduction in corruption
(as further described in Annex I, the
‘‘Program Objective’’).
Section 1.3 Project Objectives
The objectives of the Projects (as
further described in Annex I) (each a
‘‘Project Objective’’ and collectively, the
‘‘Project Objectives’’) are as follows:
(a) The objectives of the KALAHI–
CIDSS Project (as defined in Annex I)
are to: (i) Improve the responsiveness of
local governments to community needs;
(ii) encourage communities to engage in
development activities; and (iii) deliver
benefits to barangay residents through
individual sub-projects.
(b) The objectives of the Secondary
National Roads Development Project (as
defined in Annex I) are to: (i) save time;
and (ii) lower vehicle operating costs for
those Filipinos living near the roads.
(c) The objectives of the Revenue
Administration Reform Project (as
defined in Annex I) are to: (i) increase
tax revenues over time; and (ii) support
the Department of Finance’s initiatives
to detect and deter corruption within its
revenue agencies.
Article 2. Funding and Resources
Section 2.1 Program Funding
Upon entry into force of this Compact,
MCC will grant to the Government,
under the terms of this Compact, an
amount not to exceed Four Hundred
Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty
Thousand United States Dollars (U.S.
$408,850,000) to support the Program
(‘‘Program Funding’’). The allocation of
Program Funding is generally described
in Annex II to this Compact.
Section 2.2 Compact Implementation
Funding
(a) Upon signature of this Compact,
MCC hereby grants to the Government,
under the terms of this Compact, in
addition to the Program Funding
described in Section 2.1, an amount not
to exceed Twenty-Five Million Sixty
Thousand United States Dollars (U.S.
$25,060,000) (‘‘Compact Implementation
Funding’’) under Section 609(g) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as
amended (the ‘‘MCA Act’’), for use by the
Government as agreed by the Parties,
which may include use for the following
purposes:
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(i) Project management activities for
the KALAHI–CIDSS Project;
(ii) Procurement and establishment of
a project management company for the
Secondary National Roads Development
Project; and
(iii) Technical assistance for advisory
services for the Revenue Administration
Reform Project.
The allocation of Compact
Implementation Funding is generally
described in Annex II to this Compact.
(b) In accordance with Section 7.4 of
this Compact, this Section 2.2 and other
provisions of this Compact necessary to
make use of Compact Implementation
Funding for the purposes set forth
herein, will be effective, for purposes of
Compact Implementation Funding only,
as of the date this Compact is signed by
MCC and the Government.
(c) Each Disbursement of Compact
Implementation Funding is subject to
satisfaction of the conditions to such
Disbursement as set forth in Annex IV.
(d) If, after the first anniversary of this
Compact entering into force, MCC
determines that the full amount of
Compact Implementation Funding
under Section 2.2(a) of this Compact
exceeds the amount which reasonably
can be utilized for the purposes and
uses set forth in Section 2.2(a) of this
Compact, MCC, by written notice to the
Government, may withdraw the excess
amount, thereby reducing the amount of
the Compact Implementation Funding
as set forth in Section 2.2(a) (such
excess, the ‘‘Excess CIF Amount’’). In
such event, the amount of Compact
Implementation Funding granted to the
Government under Section 2.2(a) will be
reduced by the Excess CIF Amount, and
MCC will have no further obligations
with respect to such Excess CIF
Amount.
(e) MCC, at its option by written
notice to the Government, may elect to
grant to the Government an amount
equal to all or a portion of such Excess
CIF Amount as an increase in the
Program Funding, and such additional
Program Funding will be subject to the
terms and conditions of this Compact
and any relevant supplemental
agreement applicable to Program
Funding.
Section 2.3 MCC Funding
Program Funding and Compact
Implementation Funding are
collectively referred to in this Compact
as ‘‘MCC Funding.’’
Section 2.4 Disbursement
In accordance with this Compact and
the Program Implementation
Agreement, MCC will disburse MCC
Funding for expenditures incurred in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
furtherance of the Program (each
instance, a ‘‘Disbursement’’). Subject to
the satisfaction of all applicable
conditions, the proceeds of such
Disbursements will be made available to
the Government, at MCC’s sole election,
by (a) deposit to one or more bank
accounts established by the Government
through MCA-Philippines and
acceptable to MCC (each, a ‘‘Permitted
Account’’) or (b) direct payment to the
relevant provider of goods, works or
services for the implementation of the
Program. MCC Funding may be
expended only to fund Program
expenditures as provided in this
Compact and the Program
Implementation Agreement.
Section 2.5 Interest
Except as otherwise agreed by MCC,
the Government will transfer to MCC
any interest or other earnings that
accrue on MCC Funding (whether by
directing such payments to a bank
account outside the Philippines that
MCC may from time to time indicate or
as otherwise directed by MCC).
Section 2.6 Government Resources;
Budget
(a) The Government will provide all
funds and other resources, and will take
all actions, that are necessary to carry
out the Government’s responsibilities
and obligations under this Compact.
(b) The Government will provide
suitable and adequate office space for
MCA-Philippines, the Fiscal Agent, the
Procurement Agent, and the MCC
resident country mission.
(c) The Government will ensure that
all MCC Funding it receives or is
projected to receive in each of its fiscal
years is fully accounted for in its annual
budget on a multi-year basis.
(d) The Government will not reduce
the normal and expected resources that
it would otherwise receive or budget
from sources other than MCC for the
activities contemplated under this
Compact and the Program.
(e) Unless the Government discloses
otherwise to MCC in writing, MCC
Funding will be in addition to the
resources that the Government would
otherwise receive or budget for the
activities contemplated under this
Compact and the Program.
(f) Without limitation of its
obligations under Section 2.6(a) above,
the Government shall: (i) Contribute
funding to MCA-Philippines as
described in Section 16 of the
Establishment Decree and in
compliance with Section 2.13 of the
Program Implementation Agreement;
and (ii) fund all costs in excess of those
budgeted for the Program, as set forth in
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61199
Annex II (as such may be modified in
accordance with the terms thereof), in
order to ensure the full and complete
implementation of the Program.
Section 2.7 Limitations on the Use of
MCC Funding
The Government will ensure that
MCC Funding (or any refunds or
reimbursements of MCC Funding paid
by the Government in accordance with
this Compact that MCC permits to be
used in connection with the Program)
will not be used for any purpose that
would violate United States law or
policy, as specified in this Compact or
as further notified to the Government in
writing or by posting from time to time
on the MCC Web site at www.mcc.gov
(the ‘‘MCC Web site’’), including, but not
limited to, the following purposes:
(a) For assistance to, or training of, the
military, police, militia, national guard
or other quasi-military organization or
unit;
(b) For any activity that is likely to
cause a substantial loss of United States
jobs or a substantial displacement of
United States production;
(c) To undertake, fund or otherwise
support any activity that is likely to
cause a significant environmental,
health, or safety hazard, as further
described in MCC’s environmental and
social guidelines posted from time to
time on the MCC Web site or otherwise
made available to the Government by
MCC (the ‘‘MCC Environmental
Guidelines’’); or
(d) To pay for the performance of
abortions as a method of family
planning or to motivate or coerce any
person to practice abortions, to pay for
the performance of involuntary
sterilizations as a method of family
planning or to coerce or provide any
financial incentive to any person to
undergo sterilizations or to pay for any
biomedical research which relates, in
whole or in part, to methods of, or the
performance of, abortions or involuntary
sterilization as a means of family
planning.
Section 2.8
Taxes and Contributions
The Government will ensure that no
MCC Funding will be used for the
payment of any existing or future taxes,
customs duties, social security and
other employment-related contributions,
or other similar charges of the
Government or any other governmental
entity (national or sub-national,
including of provinces, cities,
municipalities, barangays, and other
local governmental entities) in the
Philippines (‘‘Taxes and
Contributions’’), in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61200
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
Section 2.4 of the Program
Implementation Agreement.
Article 3. Implementation
Section 3.1
Agreement
Program Implementation
Prior to entry into force of this
Compact, the Government and MCC will
enter into an agreement relating to,
among other matters, implementation
arrangements, fiscal accountability, and
the disbursement and use of MCC
Funding (the ‘‘Program Implementation
Agreement’’ or ‘‘PIA’’). The Government
will implement the Program in
accordance with the Compact and the
PIA.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section 3.2 Government
Responsibilities
(a) The Government has principal
responsibility for overseeing and
managing the implementation of the
Program.
(b) The Government hereby designates
MCA-Philippines, an entity established
through the issuance of Executive Order
No. 849 of the Government (as
amended, the ‘‘Establishment Decree’’),
as the accountable entity to implement
the Program and to exercise and perform
the Government’s rights and
responsibilities with respect to the
oversight, management, and
implementation of the Program,
including, without limitation, managing
the implementation of Projects and their
Activities, allocating resources, and
managing procurements. Such entity
will be referred to herein as Millennium
Challenge Account-Philippines (‘‘MCAPhilippines’’), and has the authority to
bind the Government with regard to all
Program Activities. The Establishment
Decree will remain in form and
substance satisfactory to MCC. For the
avoidance of doubt, the designation of
MCA-Philippines as set forth in this
Section 3.2(b) will not relieve the
Government of any of its obligations or
responsibilities as set forth hereunder,
under any related agreement (including,
upon execution thereof, the PIA), or
under the Program Guidelines, for
which the Government remains fully
responsible. MCC hereby acknowledges
and consents to the designation in this
Section 3.2(b).
(c) The Government will ensure that
no law or regulation in the Philippines
now or hereinafter in effect makes or
will make unlawful or otherwise
prevent or hinder the performance of
any of the Government’s obligations
under this Compact, the PIA, or any
other related agreement or any
transaction contemplated hereby or
thereby.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
(d) The Government will ensure that
any assets or services funded in whole
or in part (directly or indirectly) by
MCC Funding are used solely in
furtherance of this Compact and the
Program unless otherwise agreed by
MCC in writing.
(e) The Government will take all
necessary or appropriate steps to
achieve the Program Objective and the
Project Objectives during the Compact
Term.
(f) The Government will fully comply
with the Program Guidelines, as
applicable, in its implementation of the
Program.
Section 3.3 Policy Performance
In addition to undertaking the specific
policy, legal, and regulatory reform
commitments identified in Annex I (if
any), the Government will seek to
maintain and to improve its level of
performance under the policy criteria
identified in Section 607 of the MCA
Act, and the selection criteria and
methodology used by MCC.
Section 3.4 Government Assurances
The Government assures MCC that, as
of the date this Compact is signed by the
Government, the information provided
to MCC by or on behalf of the
Government in the course of reaching
agreement with MCC on this Compact is
true, correct and complete in all
material respects.
Section 3.5 Implementation Letters
From time to time, MCC may provide
guidance to the Government in writing
on any matters relating to this Compact,
MCC Funding, or implementation of the
Program (each, an ‘‘Implementation
Letter’’). The Government will apply
such guidance in implementing the
Program. Without limiting the foregoing,
either Party may, through its Principal
Representative or any Additional
Representative, as the case may be,
initiate discussions that may result in a
jointly agreed-upon Implementation
Letter to confirm and record their
mutual understanding on aspects
related to the implementation of this
Compact, the PIA, or other related
agreements.
Section 3.6 Procurement
The Government will ensure that the
procurement of all goods, works, and
services by the Government, or any
applicable provider providing goods,
works, and services, to implement the
Program will be consistent with the
program procurement guidelines posted
from time to time on the MCC Web site
(the ‘‘MCC Program Procurement
Guidelines’’). The MCC Program
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Procurement Guidelines include, among
others, the following requirements:
(a) Open, fair, and competitive
procedures must be used in a
transparent manner to solicit, award and
administer contracts and to procure
goods, works, and services;
(b) Solicitations for goods, works, and
services must be based upon a clear and
accurate description of the goods,
works, and services to be acquired;
(c) Contracts must be awarded only to
qualified contractors that have the
capability and willingness to perform
the contracts in accordance with their
terms on a cost effective and timely
basis;
(d) No more than a commercially
reasonable price, as determined, for
example, by a comparison of price
quotations and market prices, will be
paid to procure goods, works, and
services; and
(e) Such procurement of goods, works,
and services by the Government, or any
applicable provider providing goods,
works, and services, to implement the
Program will not be subject to any
domestic preference, local content, or
local labor requirements.
Section 3.7 Records; Accounting;
Covered Providers; Access
(a) Government Books and Records.
The Government will maintain, and will
use its best efforts to ensure that all
Covered Providers maintain, accounting
books, records, documents, and other
evidence relating to the Program
adequate to show, to MCC’s satisfaction,
the use of all MCC Funding (‘‘Compact
Records’’). In addition, the Government
will furnish or cause to be furnished to
MCC, upon its request, all such
Compact Records.
(b) Accounting. The Government will
maintain, and will use its best efforts to
ensure that all Covered Providers
maintain, Compact Records in
accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles prevailing in the
United States, or at the Government’s
option and with MCC’s prior written
approval, other accounting principles,
such as those (i) prescribed by the
International Accounting Standards
Board, or (ii) then prevailing in the
Philippines. Compact Records must be
maintained for at least five (5) years
after the end of the Compact Term or for
such longer period, if any, required to
resolve any litigation, claims or audit
findings or any statutory requirements.
(c) Providers and Covered Providers.
Unless the Parties agree otherwise in
writing, a ‘‘Provider’’ is (i) any entity of
the Government that receives or uses
MCC Funding or any other Program
Asset in carrying out activities in
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
furtherance of this Compact, or (ii) any
third party that receives at least Fifty
Thousand United Stated Dollars
(US$50,000) in the aggregate of MCC
Funding (other than as salary or
compensation as an employee of an
entity of the Government) during the
Compact Term. A ‘‘Covered Provider’’ is
(1) a non-United States Provider that
receives (other than pursuant to a direct
contract or agreement with MCC) Three
Hundred Thousand United States
Dollars (US$300,000) or more of MCC
Funding in any Government fiscal year
or any other non-United States person
or entity that receives, directly or
indirectly, Three Hundred Thousand
United States Dollars (US$300,000) or
more of MCC Funding from any
Provider in such fiscal year, or (2) any
United States Provider that receives
(other than pursuant to a direct contract
or agreement with MCC) Five Hundred
Thousand United States Dollars
(US$500,000) or more of MCC Funding
in any Government fiscal year or any
other United States person or entity that
receives, directly or indirectly, Five
Hundred Thousand United States
Dollars (US$500,000) or more of MCC
Funding from any Provider in such
fiscal year.
(d) Access. Upon MCC’s request, the
Government, at all reasonable times,
will permit, or cause to be permitted,
authorized representatives of MCC, an
authorized Inspector General, the
United States Government
Accountability Office, any auditor
responsible for an audit contemplated
herein or otherwise conducted in
furtherance of this Compact, and any
agents or representatives engaged by
MCC or the Government to conduct any
assessment, review, or evaluation of the
Program, the opportunity to audit,
review, evaluate, or inspect facilities
and activities funded in whole or in part
by MCC Funding.
Section 3.8 Audits; Reviews
(a) Government Audits. Except as the
Parties may otherwise agree in writing,
the Government will, on at least a semiannual basis, conduct, or cause to be
conducted, financial audits of all
Disbursements of MCC Funding
covering the period from signing of this
Compact until the earlier of the
following December 31 or June 30 and
covering each six-month period
thereafter ending December 31 and June
30, through the end of the Compact
Term. In addition, upon MCC’s request,
the Government will ensure that such
audits are conducted by an independent
auditor approved by MCC and named
on the list of local auditors approved by
the Inspector General of MCC (the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
‘‘Inspector General’’) or a United Statesbased certified public accounting firm
selected in accordance with the
‘‘Guidelines for Financial Audits
Contracted by MCA’’ (the ‘‘Audit
Guidelines’’) issued and revised from
time to time by the Inspector General,
which are posted on the MCC Web site.
Audits will be performed in accordance
with the Audit Guidelines and be
subject to quality assurance oversight by
the Inspector General. Each audit must
be completed and the audit report
delivered to MCC no later than ninety
(90) days after the first period to be
audited and no later than ninety (90)
days after each June 30 and December
31 thereafter, or such other period as the
Parties may otherwise agree in writing.
(b) Audits of United States Entities.
The Government will ensure that
agreements between the Government or
any Provider, on the one hand, and a
United States nonprofit organization, on
the other hand, that are financed with
MCC Funding state that the United
States nonprofit organization is subject
to the applicable audit requirements
contained in OMB Circular A–133,
‘‘Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non Profit Organizations,’’ issued
by the United States Government Office
of Management and Budget. The
Government will ensure that agreements
between the Government or any
Provider, on the one hand, and a United
States for-profit Covered Provider, on
the other hand, that are financed with
MCC Funding state that the United
States for-profit organization is subject
to audit by the applicable United States
Government agency, unless the
Government and MCC agree otherwise
in writing.
(c) Corrective Actions. The
Government will (i) use its best efforts
to ensure that Covered Providers take,
where necessary, appropriate and timely
corrective actions in response to audits,
(ii) consider whether the results of a
Covered Provider’s audit necessitates
adjustment of the Government’s records,
and (iii) require each such Covered
Provider to permit independent auditors
to have access to its records and
financial statements as necessary.
(d) Audit by MCC. MCC will have the
right to arrange for audits of the
Government’s use of MCC Funding.
(e) Cost of Audits, Reviews or
Evaluations. MCC Funding may be used
to fund the costs of any audits, reviews,
or evaluations required under this
Compact.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61201
Article 4. Communications
Section 4.1
Communications
Any document or communication
required or submitted by either Party to
the other under this Compact must be in
writing and, except as otherwise agreed
with MCC, in English. For this purpose,
the address of each Party is set forth
below. The Government will provide to
MCC any information that is missing
from below.
To MCC:
Millennium Challenge Corporation,
Attention: Vice President, Compact
Operations, (in each case, with a copy
to the Vice President and General
Counsel), 875 Fifteenth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005, United States of
America, Facsimile: (202) 521–3700,
Telephone: (202) 521–3600, e-mail:
VPOperations@mcc.gov (Vice President,
Compact Operations),
VPGeneralCounsel@mcc.gov (Vice
President and General Counsel).
To the Government:
Attention: Secretary of Finance, (in
each case, with a copy to the
Undersecretary for International
Finance Group), Address: 6/F, DOF
Building, Department of Finance,
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Complex,
Roxas Boulevard, Manila 1004
Philippines, Facsimile: (632) 523–9495/
(632) 523–9216, Telephone: (632) 523–
9215/(632) 523–9911, e-mail:
mcccompact@dof.gov.ph.
To MCA-Philippines:
Attention: Managing Director,
Address: Room Nos. 602–604, 6/F EDPC
Building, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Complex, Roxas Boulevard, Manila 1004
Philippines, Contact details on the
facsimile number, telephone number,
and e-mail address will be provided in
writing to MCC by MCA-Philippines
Section 4.2
Representatives
For all purposes of this Compact, the
Government will be represented by the
individual holding the position of, or
acting as, the Secretary of Finance and
MCC will be represented by the
individual holding the position of, or
acting as, Vice President, Compact
Operations (each of the foregoing, a
‘‘Principal Representative’’). Each Party,
by written notice to the other Party, may
designate one or more additional
representatives (each, an ‘‘Additional
Representative’’) for all purposes other
than signing amendments to this
Compact. The Government hereby
irrevocably designates the Managing
Director of MCA-Philippines as an
Additional Representative. A Party may
change its Principal Representative to a
new representative that holds a position
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61202
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
of equal or higher rank upon written
notice to the other Party.
Article 5. Termination; Suspension;
Refunds
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section 5.1
Termination; Suspension
(a) Either Party may terminate this
Compact without cause in whole by
giving the other Party thirty (30) days
written notice. MCC may also terminate
this Compact without cause in part by
giving the Government thirty (30) days
written notice.
(b) MCC may, immediately, upon
written notice to the Government,
suspend or terminate this Compact or
MCC Funding, in whole or in part, and
any obligation related thereto, if MCC
determines that any circumstance
identified by MCC in writing to the
Government as a basis for suspension or
termination has occurred, which
circumstances include, but are not
limited, to the following:
(i) The Government fails to comply
with its obligations under this Compact,
the PIA, or any other agreement or
arrangement entered into by the
Government in connection with this
Compact or the Program;
(ii) An event or series of events has
occurred that MCC determines makes it
probable that the Program Objective or
any of the Project Objectives will not be
achieved during the Compact Term or
that the Government will not be able to
perform its obligations under this
Compact;
(iii) A use of MCC Funding or
continued implementation of this
Compact or the Program violates
applicable law or United States
Government policy, whether now or
hereafter in effect;
(iv) The Government or any other
person or entity receiving MCC Funding
or using assets acquired in whole or in
part with MCC Funding is engaged in
activities that are contrary to the
national security interests of the United
States;
(v) An act has been committed or an
omission or an event has occurred that
would render the Philippines ineligible
to receive United States economic
assistance under Part I of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22
U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), by reason of the
application of any provision of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 or any
other provision of law;
(vi) The Philippines is classified as a
Tier 3 country in the United States
Department of State’s annual Trafficking
in Persons Report;
(vii) The Government has engaged in
a pattern of actions inconsistent with
the criteria used to determine the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
eligibility of the Philippines for
assistance under the MCA Act; or
(viii) The Government or another
person or entity receiving MCC Funding
or using assets acquired in whole or in
part with MCC Funding is found to have
been convicted of a narcotics offense or
to have been engaged in drug trafficking.
(c) All Disbursements will cease upon
expiration, suspension, or termination
of this Compact; provided, however,
MCC may permit MCC Funding to be
used, in compliance with this Compact
and the PIA, to pay for (i) expenditures
for goods, works, or services that are
properly incurred under or in
furtherance of the Program before
expiration, suspension, or termination
of this Compact, and (ii) reasonable
expenditures (including administrative
expenses) properly incurred in
connection with the winding up of the
Program within one hundred twenty
(120) days after the expiration,
suspension, or termination of this
Compact, so long as, with respect to (i)
and (ii) herein, the request for such
expenditures is submitted within ninety
(90) days after such expiration,
suspension, or termination.
(d) Subject to Section 5.1(c), upon the
expiration, suspension, or termination
of this Compact, (i) any amounts of MCC
Funding not disbursed by MCC in
accordance with the Compact and the
PIA will be automatically released from
any obligation in connection with this
Compact, and (ii) any amounts of MCC
Funding disbursed to the Permitted
Account by MCC but not expended
before the expiration, suspension or
termination of this Compact, plus
accrued interest thereon will be
returned to MCC within thirty (30) days
after the Government receives MCC’s
request for such return; provided,
however, that if this Compact is
suspended or terminated in part, MCC
may request a refund for only the
amount of MCC Funding allocated to
the suspended or terminated portion.
For the avoidance of doubt, interest will
accrue from the date of the violation and
will be calculated at the 10-year U.S.
Treasury Note rate prevailing as of the
close of business in Washington, DC as
of the date of MCC’s request for
payment.
(e) MCC may reinstate any suspended
or terminated MCC Funding under this
Compact if MCC determines that the
Government or other relevant person or
entity has committed to correct each
condition for which MCC Funding was
suspended or terminated.
Section 5.2 Refunds; Violation
(a) If any MCC Funding, any interest
or earnings thereon, or any asset
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
acquired in whole or in part with MCC
Funding is used for any purpose in
violation of the terms of this Compact or
the PIA, including, but not limited to,
any violation of the Program Guidelines,
then MCC may require the Government
to repay to MCC in United States Dollars
the value of the misused MCC Funding,
interest, earnings, or asset, plus interest
within thirty (30) days after the
Government’s receipt of MCC’s request
for repayment. For the avoidance of
doubt, interest will accrue from the date
of the violation and will be calculated
at the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate
prevailing as of the close of business in
Washington, DC as of the date of MCC’s
request for payment. The Government
will not use MCC Funding, proceeds
thereof or Program Assets to make such
payment.
(b) Notwithstanding any other
provision in this Compact or any other
agreement to the contrary, MCC’s right
under this Section 5.2 for a refund will
continue during the Compact Term and
for a period of (i) five (5) years
thereafter, or (ii) one (1) year after MCC
receives actual knowledge of such
violation, whichever is later.
Section 5.3
Survival
The Government’s responsibilities
under Sections 2.4, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 3.7, 3.8,
5.1(c), 5.1(d), 5.2, 5.3, 6.2, and 6.4 of
this Compact will survive the
expiration, suspension, or termination
of this Compact.
Article 6. Compact Annexes;
Amendments; Governing Law
Section 6.1
Annexes
Each annex to this Compact
constitutes an integral part hereof, and
references to ‘‘Annex’’ mean an annex to
this Compact unless otherwise expressly
stated.
Section 6.2
Amendments
(a) The Parties may amend this
Compact only by a written agreement
signed by the Principal Representatives.
(b) Without amending this Compact,
the Government hereby acknowledges
and agrees that the Parties may, through
the Principal Representative or any
Additional Representative, in writing
agree to modify any Annex to this
Compact to (i) suspend, terminate
(including the termination of a Project
Objective), or modify any project
described in Annex I (each, a ‘‘Project’’
and collectively, the ‘‘Projects’’) or to
create a new project, (ii) change the
allocations of funds from what is set
forth in Annex II as of the date hereof,
or (iii) add, delete, or waive any
condition precedent described in Annex
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
IV, provided that any such modification,
(1) is consistent in all material respects
with the Program Objective, (2) does not
cause the amount of Program Funding to
exceed the aggregate amount specified
in Section 2.1 of this Compact (as may
be modified by operation of Section
2.2(e) of this Compact), (3) does not
cause the amount of Compact
Implementation Funding to exceed the
aggregate amount specified in Section
2.2(a) of this Compact, (4) does not
cause the Government’s responsibilities
or contribution of resources to be less
than specified in this Compact, (5) does
not extend the Compact Term, and (6)
in the case of a modification to change
allocations of funds among Projects or
the creation of a new Project, does not
materially adversely affect any
components under the Program
Administration and Audits or
Monitoring and Evaluation line items in
Annex II.
(c) Any modification of any Annex to
this Compact signed in accordance with
Section 6.2(b), or any modification of
any other provision of this Compact
pursuant to Section 6.2(a), will be
binding on the Government without the
need for further action by the
Government, any further Congressional
action, or satisfaction of any additional
legal requirements of the Philippines.
Section 6.3 Inconsistencies
In the event of any conflict or
inconsistency between:
(a) Any Annex to this Compact and
any of Article 1.1 and Articles 2 through
8, such Article 1.1 and Articles 2
through 8, as applicable, will prevail; or
(b) This Compact and any other
agreement between the Parties regarding
the Program, this Compact will prevail.
Section 6.4 Governing Law
This Compact is an international
agreement and as such will be governed
by the principles of international law.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section 6.5 Additional Instruments
Any reference to activities,
obligations, or rights undertaken or
existing under or in furtherance of this
Compact or similar language will
include activities, obligations, and
rights undertaken by or existing under
or in furtherance of any agreement,
document, or instrument related to this
Compact and the Program.
Section 6.6 References to MCC Web
site
Any reference in this Compact, the
PIA, or any other agreement entered into
in connection with this Compact, to a
document or information available on,
or notified by posting on, the MCC Web
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
site will be deemed a reference to such
document or information as updated or
substituted on the MCC Web site from
time to time.
Section 6.7 References to Laws,
Regulations, Policies, and Guidelines
Each reference in this Compact, the
PIA, or any other agreement entered into
in connection with this Compact, to a
law, regulation, policy, guideline, or
similar document (including, but not
limited to, the Program Guidelines) will
be construed as a reference to such law,
regulation, policy, guideline, or similar
document as it may, from time to time,
be amended, revised, replaced, or
extended and will include any law,
regulation, policy, guideline, or similar
document issued under or otherwise
applicable or related to such law,
regulation, policy, guideline, or similar
document.
Section 6.8 MCC Status
MCC is a United States government
corporation acting on behalf of the
United States government in the
implementation of this Compact. MCC
and the United States government have
no liability under this Compact, the
Program Implementation Agreement, or
any related agreement, are immune from
any action or proceeding arising under
or relating to any of the foregoing
documents, and the Government hereby
waives and releases all claims related to
any such liability. In matters arising
under or relating to this Compact, the
Program Implementation Agreement, or
any related agreement, neither MCC nor
the United States government will be
subject to the jurisdiction of the courts
of the Philippines or of any other
jurisdiction or of any other body.
Section 6.9 Counterparts; Electronic
Delivery
(a) Counterparts. Signatures to this
Compact, the Program Implementation
Agreement, and any amendments to
these agreements will be signed on the
same page, except in the case of
amendment via exchange of letters or
diplomatic notes. Any other documents
arising out of this Compact may be
signed in one or more counterparts.
Such counterparts when delivered and
taken together will constitute a single
document.
(b) Electronic Delivery. A signature to
this Compact, the Program
Implementation Agreement, and any
amendments to such agreements, will be
an original signature. With respect to
any other documents arising out of this
Compact, a signature delivered by
facsimile or electronic mail in
accordance with Section 4.1 of this
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61203
Compact will be deemed an original
signature and will be binding on the
Party delivering such signature, and the
Parties hereby waive any objection to
such signature or to the validity of the
underlying document, certificate,
notice, instrument, or agreement on the
basis of the signature’s legal effect,
validity or enforceability solely because
it is in facsimile or electronic form.
Article 7. Entry Into Force
Section 7.1 Conditions Precedent to
Entry Into Force
Before this Compact enters into force:
(a) The PIA must have been signed by
the parties thereto;
(b) The Government must have
delivered to MCC:
(i) A legal opinion from the Secretary
of Justice of the Philippines (or such
other legal representative of the
Government acceptable to MCC), in
form and substance satisfactory to MCC;
and
(ii) Complete, certified copies of all
decrees, legislation, regulations, or other
governmental documents relating to the
Government’s domestic requirements
for this Compact to enter into force,
which MCC may post on the MCC Web
site or otherwise make publicly
available; and
(c) MCC must determine that, after
signature of this Compact, the
Government has not engaged in a
pattern of actions inconsistent with the
eligibility criteria for MCC Funding.
Section 7.2 Date of Entry Into Force
This Compact will enter into force on
the date of the last letter in an exchange
of letters between the Principal
Representatives confirming that each
Party has completed its domestic
requirements for entry into force of this
Compact and that the conditions
precedent to entry into force of Section
7.1 have been met. The letter from the
Government will contain an affirmation
of the Government’s commitment to its
obligations hereunder and under the
Program Implementation Agreement.
Section 7.3 Compact Term
This Compact will remain in force for
five (5) years after its entry into force,
unless terminated earlier under Section
5.1 (the ‘‘Compact Term’’).
Section 7.4 Provisional Application
Upon signature of this Compact and
until this Compact has entered into
force in accordance with Section 7.2,
the Parties will provisionally apply the
terms of this Compact and the PIA;
provided that, no Program Funding will
be made available or disbursed before
this Compact enters into force.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61204
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned,
duly authorized by their respective
governments, have signed this Compact.
Article 8. Additional Government
Covenants
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section 8.1
Project Covenants
(a) KALAHI–CIDSS Project. With
regard to the KALAHI–CIDSS Project,
the Government agrees that:
(i) Throughout the Compact Term, the
Department of Social Welfare and
Development (‘‘DSWD’’) will use the
classification system approved by MCC
to assess and classify every proposed
sub-project, and provide the engineering
design and oversight support
appropriate to the classification of such
sub-project; and
(ii) For those municipalities that are
randomly selected to be included in the
control group, DSWD will not (1)
provide KALAHI–CIDSS funding, or (2)
provide other programs of DSWD on a
systematic basis, in both cases for the
duration of the Compact Term.
(b) Revenue Administration Reform
Project. With regard to the Revenue
Administration Reform Project, the
Government agrees to implement the
following prior to the initial
disbursement of any Program Funding
for the Revenue Administration Reform
Project:
(i) To the full extent allowed by
existing law, procedures shall be put in
place wherein decisions of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue and
the Commissioner of Customs in all
graft-related cases shall be transmitted
promptly to the Secretary of Finance,
the head of the Revenue Integrity
Protection Service created under
Executive Order No. 259, s. 2003, who
shall then immediately forward them to
the Revenue Integrity Protection Service
to review the said cases and determine
their compliance with existing laws and
procedures. If warranted by the
evidence on record and any additional
evidence it gathers, the Revenue
Integrity Protection Service shall file the
necessary complaint(s) with the office of
the ombudsman or other appropriate
administrative body or agency of
competent jurisdiction.
(ii) The Revenue Integrity Protection
Service shall actively exercise its
powers pursuant to Executive Order No.
259, to ensure the proactive pursuit of
graft-related programs, policies and
procedures by the internal inspection
units of the revenue agencies under the
Department of Finance. These actions
shall include, but may not be limited to,
the conduct of operational audits of said
units.
(iii) The Bureau of Internal Revenue
and the Bureau of Customs internal
audit units will be reorganized directly
under the Office of the Commissioner.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Done at New York, NY, this 23rd day of
September 2010, in the English language
only.
For Millennium Challenge Corporation, on
behalf of the United States of America.
Daniel W. Yohannes,
Chief Executive Officer.
For the Republic of the Philippines.
Cesar V. Purisima,
Secretary of Finance.
Annex I Program Description
This Annex I describes the Program that
MCC Funding will support in the Philippines
during the Compact Term.
A. Program Overview
1. Background and Consultative Process
The Philippines was declared eligible for
MCC assistance in March 2008. With a
population of approximately 90 million
inhabitants, the 7,107 islands of the
Philippines cover a combined area of 115,830
square miles. Despite unprecedented growth
gains over the past decade, accompanied by
moderate inflation, the Philippines continues
to face severe constraints to reducing
poverty. In an effort to prioritize its
development spending, the Government
elaborated a national medium-term
development plan and several sector
strategies, and undertook an analysis of
constraints to economic growth. Priorities
were identified for increased social sector
spending, improvements to basic
infrastructure, and improvements to
governance, and were confirmed through a
number of national, regional, and local
consultations from early 2007 through early
2009.
The Program has been designed by the
Government, building upon initiatives from
numerous donors, non-governmental
organizations, and the domestic private
sector to spur growth in economically
depressed or vulnerable regions and to
provide a platform for continued poverty
reduction efforts. The Program will enable
the Government to increase resources
available for high-priority expenditures and
target Government initiatives toward some of
the poorest regions and municipalities in the
archipelago.
2. Program Objective
The Program Objective is to: (a) Increase
the incomes of Filipinos through the benefits
of community-driven sub-projects; (b) obtain
time savings and lower transportation costs
for road users in Program areas; and (c)
increase investment and government
expenditure due to an increase in tax revenue
and a reduction in corruption.
3. Environmental and Social Safeguards
The Program will be implemented in
compliance with the MCC Environmental
Guidelines, MCC guidance on the integration
of gender in program implementation, and
MCC’s guidance on the implementation of
resettlement activities (or any other MCC
policy comparable to the World Bank’s
Operational Policy on Involuntary
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Resettlement in effect as of July 2007) (‘‘OP
4.12’’). The Government will also ensure that
the Projects comply with all national
environmental laws and regulations, licenses
and permits, except to the extent such
compliance would be inconsistent with this
Compact. The Government will: (a)
Cooperate with any ongoing environmental
review, or if necessary undertake and
complete any additional environmental
reviews required by MCC or under the laws
of the Philippines; (b) implement to MCC’s
satisfaction environmental and social
mitigation measures identified in such
environmental review; and (c) fund the costs
of environmental mitigation (including costs
of resettlement) that exceed the MCC
Funding specifically allocated for such costs
in the budget for any Project. To maximize
the positive social impacts of the program,
the Government will take steps to address
cross-cutting social and gender-specific
issues, including, but not limited to,
combating human trafficking and HIV/AIDS,
during Compact implementation.
B. Description of the Projects
Set forth below is a description of each of
the Projects that the Government will
implement, or cause to be implemented,
using MCC Funding to advance the
applicable Project Objective. In addition,
specific activities that will be undertaken
within each Project (each, an ‘‘Activity’’),
including sub-activities, are described.
1. KALAHI–CIDSS Project
(a) Background.
The Philippines lags significantly behind
other countries in the region with respect to
government development expenditures as a
percentage of GDP and infrastructure
investment and quality. The Asian
Development Bank’s 2007 growth diagnostic
report found that inadequacies in
infrastructure are a critical constraint to
growth and that the availability of basic
infrastructure (water, sanitation, roads,
electricity) is regressive. While human
capital was not found to be a critical
constraint to growth, inadequate human
capabilities are often an underlying cause of
poverty. Provision and use of education and
health services were found to vary across
regions, particularly as a function of incomes.
Community driven development projects are
a strategy for addressing these constraints
and providing community empowerment and
poverty reduction. In the past, they have
been used to support a wide range of
community priority needs including
provision of water supply and nutrition
programs for women and children; building
of school, day care and health facilities, farm
to market roads, foot bridges, and drainage
systems; and support for productive
enterprises such as pre- and post-harvest
facilities as well as community capacity
building.
Kapit bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (‘‘Linking
Arms Against Poverty’’)—Comprehensive
Integrated Delivery of Social Services
(‘‘KALAHI–CIDSS’’) is a community driven
development project implemented by DSWD
of the Philippines. Through KALAHI–CIDSS,
communities (‘‘barangays’’ or villages) are
trained, together with their local
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
governments, both at the barangay and the
municipal level, to choose, design and
implement sub-projects that are intended to
address their most pressing needs. This is
done through a four-year program, which
includes one year of ‘‘social preparation’’
training for communities, barangays and
municipalities, followed by 3 ‘‘cycles’’ of subproject implementation. The KALAHI–CIDSS
project to be funded by MCC (the ‘‘KALAHI–
CIDSS Project’’) is an expansion of an initial
KALAHI–CIDSS project (‘‘KC1’’) that was
implemented between 2003 and 2010. KC1
was funded by a loan from the World Bank.
During KC1 implementation, the World Bank
and DSWD were able to ensure that the
project incorporated lessons learned and
reinforced elements that had been shown to
work well.
The KALAHI–CIDSS Project is particularly
well suited to the sociopolitical environment
in the Philippines. Following
decentralization, local governments have a
responsibility to provide basic services, yet
suffer from a lack of development resources.
This issue is compounded by the geographic
distribution of poverty in the Philippines.
Poverty in the country is correlated with
rural isolation and distance from towns and
urban centers, meaning that the communities
that have the greatest needs for basic services
are the ones that are most difficult to reach.
Community-driven development offers an
alternative, needs-based approach that
provides development resources for basic
services directly to the poorest communities,
specifically targeting those in far-flung areas,
while at the same time building the capacity
of local government to be responsive to these
needs over time. It is because of this
contextualized approach that KC1 has
already met with considerable success.
(b) Project.
The objectives of the KALAHI–CIDSS
Project are to:
• Improve the responsiveness of local
governments to community needs;
• Encourage communities to engage in
development activities; and
• Deliver benefits to barangay residents
through the individual sub-projects.
In conjunction with DSWD, MCC will
incorporate a number of enhancements to
KC1 into the KALAHI–CIDSS Project, all of
which are supported by lessons learned from
KC1 and desires expressed by KALAHI–
CIDSS Project stakeholders. These
refinements include, but are not limited to:
(i) Dedicated gender staff positions and
gender-focused activities, including the
provision of ‘‘gender incentive grants’’ to
communities; (ii) reinforced financial
controls on the Project, including an
additional set of transaction and technical
audits; (iii) dedicated staff positions to
explore private-sector involvement
opportunities within municipalities included
in the KALAHI–CIDSS Project; (iv)
development of a set of user-friendly
community tools to assess environmental
impact and ensure the KALAHI–CIDSS
Project’s environmental sustainability; (v) a
management information system to enable a
much greater level of data capture at the
barangay and municipal level, including a
‘‘geographic information system’’ component;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
(vi) a rigorous impact evaluation to assess the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project’s impact on social
capital and welfare measures using a rigorous
random selection technique that allows the
measurement of attribution; and (vii) support
for a joint advisory board to oversee the
impact evaluation, composed of members
from MCC, MCA–Philippines, the World
Bank, DSWD, the National Economic
Development Authority, and local academics.
The KALAHI–CIDSS Project will cover
municipalities that have a poverty incidence
higher than the national average and that are
not in the Mindanao island group. The
KALAHI–CIDSS Project consists of the
following Activities:
(i) Capacity Building and Implementation
Support Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD to
provide the staff salaries and trainings for the
DSWD frontline workers, known as the area
coordinating teams. These teams are made up
of a standard staffing complement and there
will be one team for each municipality in the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project. The role of the area
coordinating team is to carry out the
‘‘Community Empowerment Activity Cycle.’’
This framework follows a progression of
strategies and activities as a gradual ‘‘hand
off’’ to local government of responsibilities
takes place over the course of three cycles.
During each cycle, barangays hold a series of
meetings that are facilitated by members of
the area coordinating team at which barangay
residents identify and prioritize constraints
to economic activities within their
communities and then identify and prioritize
solutions to these constraints. Finally, the
barangay selects one constraint and
associated solution for presentation by
elected community representatives to the
‘‘Municipal Inter-Barangay Forum.’’ At the
municipal level, two Municipal InterBarangay Forums are held, the first to
determine the criteria by which the
community representatives will prioritize the
barangay sub-projects for funding and the
second to prioritize them according to such
criteria. At the conclusion of each of the
three cycles of sub-project implementation,
there is a transition and reporting period. The
entire Community Empowerment Activity
Cycle process is facilitated by the area
coordinating team, with various team
members responsible for ensuring that
processes are transparent and in accordance
with the KALAHI–CIDSS Project manuals as
revised by MCC. This Activity also supports
the existing grievance redress system.
(ii) Grants for Community Projects
Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD, to
be used by DSWD to plan and implement
community-chosen sub-projects in
accordance with the KALAHI–CIDSS Project
manuals approved by MCC. Specifically, the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project provides grants for
livelihood activities and the construction,
repair and improvement/upgrading of smallscale rural infrastructure sub-projects
identified by the community. The
municipalities and barangays in which subproject activities will occur will make cash
and in-kind contributions (including
partially-paid labor and local materials) to
the sub-projects equal, in each case, to at
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61205
least 30 percent of the total sub-project costs.
The grant allocated to the municipal local
governments to fund sub-project
implementation is proportionate in size to
the number of barangays within that
municipality. Suppliers and contractors will
be selected according to the procedures in
the ‘‘Community-Based Procurement
System.’’ This procurement system was
specifically designed for implementing the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project taking into account
the nature of the procurements, the local
market conditions and the local capacities.
At the community level an ‘‘Audit and
Inventory Committee’’ is responsible for
auditing the financial records and reports of
the community and conducting a regular
inventory of all properties acquired by the
community. The community’s books and
records are open at all times to all members
of the community for inspection.
Communities have the opportunity to
select from a variety of sub-projects, many
which involve the selection, design, and
construction of small infrastructure subprojects. DSWD—in cooperation with local
governments—will build the capacity of
communities through trainings and other
methods and provide guidance and oversight
throughout the process. In cooperation with
DSWD, MCC will create a detailed risk
profiling system for sub-projects and a
complementary risk-based management
approach to oversight that may affect the way
that the grants are spent within the Grants for
Community Project Activity.
(iii) Project Management Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD to
provide salaries and training for DSWD
project management staff at the regional and
national level. These funds will also be used
for the office space, conferences, capacity
building and project monitoring associated
with the project management activity. Goods
to support this activity will be procured by
MCA-Philippines.
(c) Beneficiaries.
In the project catchment areas (i.e. those
municipalities that will receive support from
the KALAHI–CIDSS Project), 16 to 20 percent
of the households have a female head, while
the young and elderly constitute a significant
fraction of the expected beneficiaries. The
Project is expected to benefit approximately
5.2 million Filipinos 20 years after the
Compact enters into force. Of these, 39
percent consume below the poverty line of
US$2 (in 2005 PPP US dollars) per day
(compared to 28 percent of the national
population). As for the extreme poor, 13
percent of the Project’s beneficiaries consume
below US$1.25 a day (compared to 9 percent
of the national population). And as for the
non-poor, only 26 percent of this Project’s
beneficiaries consume above US$4 a day (as
opposed to 38 percent of the national
population). Overall, the Project is welltargeted to the poor.
(d) Donor Coordination.
MCC worked closely with the World Bank
on issues of targeting and impact evaluation
strategy over the course of project
development in 2009. As of January 2010, the
World Bank intends to provide an additional
loan to expand KC1. The World Bank and
MCC plan to continue close collaboration
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
61206
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
during and beyond the scope of this
additional funding and share lessons learned
with each other and with DSWD as KALAHI–
CIDSS continues to mature and develop
towards a potential national expansion that
could involve many other donors. MCC will
also be joining DSWD’s donor forum related
to KALAHI–CIDSS.
(e) USAID.
The United States Agency for International
Development (‘‘USAID’’) has had significant
experience with community-based
development that targets poor communities,
and the ‘‘Growth with Equity in Mindanao’’
Program has provided a number of lessons
for the implementation of the KALAHI–
CIDSS Project as it relates to smallinfrastructure construction specifically.
Approximately 60 percent of USAID’s
program funding is provided to Mindanao
and the agency aims to continue these
investments and others like it in the region.
Therefore, USAID, the World Bank and MCC
agreed that MCC would concentrate its
KALAHI–CIDSS Project in the Luzon and
Visayas regions thereby broadening the reach
of such programs throughout the Philippines.
(f) Sustainability.
The implementation methods used in this
Project emphasize transparency and
accountability in local decision making,
attributes which enable small infrastructure
sub-projects to contribute to a more
empowered citizenry, a more responsive
government and ultimately to more
sustainable community assets. The process of
involving communities in sub-project
activities builds their capacity to take charge
of their own development within the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project and beyond, reduces
corruption, increases accountability for the
use of resources and results in more and
better distributed assets as communities
build a sense of ownership around these
assets.
DSWD will use a set of sustainability and
functionality evaluation tools to assess MCCfunded sub-projects and will target those subprojects experiencing sustainability-related
difficulties with additional resources to
resolve them. MCC’s risk profiling and risk
management approach described above will
also contribute to sub-project sustainability
by ensuring that the most risk-prone projects
are designed and constructed to minimize
risk, reducing the likelihood of sub-project
failure.
The sustainability of the KALAHI–CIDSS
Project and its ability to attract new and
continued resources from both the
Government and other donors is closely
related to its ability to demonstrate
continuing project successes as it moves
towards a national scale. MCC Funding will
be used for a robust impact evaluation that
will assist the Government in evaluating the
effectiveness of the community-driven
development model.
2. Secondary National Roads Development
Project
(a) Background.
Road transportation is the dominant
transport mode in the Philippines,
accounting for 53 percent of freight tonkilometers and 89 percent of passenger tonkilometers. The Philippines has a total road
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
network of about 200,000 km, including
about 29,000 km of national roads.
Approximately 79 percent of the national
arterial roads are paved, and 48 percent of
these require rehabilitation.1
Inter- and intra-island transport systems
have a crucial role in supporting the
economic development of the widely
dispersed regions of the Philippine
archipelago. However, the present inadequate
condition of infrastructure facilities and lack
of reliable, safe, and efficient transport
services significantly hamper the movement
of passengers and cargo throughout the
country, thus limiting direct internal and
external trade links and tourism, and
constituting a major constraint to increased
regional economic growth. This is
particularly true in many poor areas of the
Philippines, where adequate accessibility has
the potential to lower marketing costs for
local agricultural products, improve access of
the local population to social services and
economic opportunities, and be a catalyst for
investments to develop local resources.
(b) Project.
The objectives of the Project to be funded
by MCC in respect of the sections of the
Samar road described below (the ‘‘Secondary
National Roads Development Project’’) are to:
(i) Save time; and (ii) lower vehicle operating
costs for those Filipinos living near the roads.
This Project consists of the following
Activity:
(i) Samar Road Activity.
MCC Funding will be used to reconstruct
and rehabilitate 220 km of the Samar road
crossing the provinces of Samar and Eastern
Samar, of which approximately 180 km will
undergo reconstruction/major rehabilitation
while 40 km will receive only minor
rehabilitation, as well as the replacement or
upgrading of associated structures, such as
bridges and culverts, to eliminate flooding
and improve road safety. The road begins at
the junction of Highway-Buray Wright (km
827 + 200) in Samar, and traverses eastward
along primarily mountainous terrain to Taft
(km 890 + 000). From Taft, it continues
southward, along the coastline of Eastern
Samar, ending in the town of Guiuan (km
1047 + 300). The section of road from Wright
to Taft is an important east-west corridor
providing inter-provincial connection
between Samar and Eastern Samar. The
section of the road from Taft to Guiuan
provides the only access to 13 coastal
municipalities. The capital of Eastern Samar,
Borongan, is located centrally on this section
of the road.
(1) Construction costs. These costs include,
without limitation, pavement rehabilitation
and strengthening, embankment
construction, road safety improvements,
replacement or upgrading of associated
structures, such as bridges, drainage systems
and culverts, and any activity associated with
the environmental management plan
developed with respect to the Samar Road
Activity.
(2) Non-construction costs. These costs
include, without limitation, studies,
construction supervision, environmental and
1 ‘‘Philippines: Critical Development Constraints,’’
Asian Development Bank, December 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
social mitigation (including resettlement),
and other project management costs and
technical assistance to be incurred in
connection with the Samar Road Activity.
(c) Beneficiaries.
A 2006 household survey shows that in
this Project’s regions, two of the most
common occupations for household heads
are farmers and drivers. These people would
be expected to rely significantly on
transportation infrastructure. The survey
indicates, in addition, that from 16 to 20
percent of households have a female head,
while the young and elderly constitute
significant fractions of household members
in the Project regions. Improvement of the
road will benefit the users and owners of
motorized vehicles, including laborers,
enterprises, consumers and tourists.
Estimates of the total number of beneficiaries
are based upon a percentage of the
populations of municipalities through which
this road will pass.
The beneficiary analysis conducted as part
of the project appraisal process has estimated
that approximately 282,000 people will
benefit from rehabilitation of the Samar road.
Thirteen percent of the beneficiaries are
estimated to consume below the poverty line
of US$1.25 per day in 2005 PPP US dollars,
while 42 percent of project beneficiaries are
estimated to consume below US$2 per day.
Relative to the national distribution of
consumption, the beneficiaries of the Samar
road are substantially poorer. Aggregated
over 25 years, beneficiaries are expected to
accumulate an increment equal to 86 percent
of their 2009 annual (median) income due to
this Project.
(d) Donor Coordination.
The Secondary National Road
Development Project is anchored on
preliminary work undertaken with the
assistance of Japan Bank for International
Cooperation (now known as the Japan
International Cooperation Agency), which
was instrumental in identifying viable
priority road segments eligible for MCC
investments.
MCC has coordinated closely with the
World Bank on the ongoing efforts in:
(i) Road sector reform; (ii) improving the
adequacy of the ‘‘Special Road Support
Fund’’ (as described below); (iii) improving
governance structure for the Special Road
Support Fund; (iv) standardizing measures
and approaches used to combat corruption
and to increase accountability (funded by the
Australian Agency for International
Development) during project execution; and
(v) standardizing technical audits.
(e) USAID.
While USAID is not currently active in
secondary national road rehabilitation in the
Philippines, USAID’s ‘‘Growth with Equity in
Mindanao’’ Program mentioned above
includes the development of road
infrastructure.
(f) Sustainability.
There are two main sources of public
finance for the national road network:
(i) The General Appropriations Act; and (ii)
a ‘‘Special Road Support Fund’’ that is
financed by the imposition of a motor vehicle
user charge. The overall resources devoted to
the national road sector have increased
considerably since 2004.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
Despite the large increases, there remains
a considerable gap (about 30 billion
Philippine pesos) between the sector’s need
and the projected resource allocation. To
meet the overall needs of the sector and
reduce the existing gap, greater funding is
required from three sources. The first source
is increased government budgetary
allocations for the sector. The second source
is the private sector, the resources of which
can be utilized for network expansion when
roads involve expressways that can be
subject to tolling arrangements. The third
source of revenue is the Special Road
Support Fund. To improve sustainability, the
Government needs to augment revenues from
the motor vehicle user charge through raising
the current charge, indexing such charge to
the general price level, and by introducing a
fuel levy.
3. Revenue Administration Reform Project
(a) Background.
The Asian Development Bank cited the
Philippines’ tight fiscal situation as one of its
most significant constraints to growth.2 One
consequence of the Philippines’ tight fiscal
situation is its limited ability to fund its
growing needs for basic infrastructure and
social programs and, thereby, to reduce
poverty. The Philippines has seen a declining
rate of tax effectiveness, i.e. tax revenues
divided by GDP, in recent years due in part
to legislated reductions in corporate tax rates
and increases in personal exemptions.
In addition, tax-related patterns of noncompliance and tax administration
inefficiencies contribute to a poor business
climate and, ultimately, to a reduced rate of
domestic investment. Since the Asian
financial crisis of 1997, the Philippines has
ranked the lowest among its major regional
neighbors in foreign direct investment.3 The
Philippines has struggled in recent years to
improve its international rankings with
regard to corruption.
MCC supported some of the Government’s
anti-corruption efforts through MCC’s
Philippines Threshold Program that sought to
improve the Government’s office of the
ombudsman’s pursuit of tax evaders and
smugglers as well as to roll out nationwide
the Integrated Tax System in offices of the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (‘‘BIR’’). Several
of the themes of MCC’s Philippines
Threshold Program have carried over into
this Project.
(b) Project.
The objectives of the Project to be
supported by MCC Funding in connection
with the reform of tax collection in the
Philippines (the ‘‘Revenue Administration
Reform Project’’) are to increase tax revenues
over time and to support the Department of
Finance’s initiatives to detect and deter
corruption within its revenue agencies. The
Project consists of two Activities as further
described below: (i) An Activity focused on
BIR’s efforts to re-engineer its policies and
practices and to implement the electronic
Tax Information System (‘‘eTIS’’); and (ii) an
Activity focused on supporting the
Philippines’ Revenue Integrity Protection
2 ‘‘Philippines: Critical Development Constraints,’’
Asian Development Bank, December 2007, p. 49.
3 Ibid. p. 26.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Service (‘‘RIPS’’) the anti-graft investigation
unit within the Department of Finance. In
turn, the BIR-focused Activity will consist of
three sub-activities as further described
below: (1) The implementation of eTIS; (2)
the utilization of automated auditing tools in
the large taxpayer unit; and (3) a public
awareness campaign to disseminate
information about BIR’s reform and
enforcement activities.
(i) BIR Revenue Administration Reform
Activity.
(1) eTIS sub-Activity.
MCC Funding will provide an International
Monetary Fund (‘‘IMF’’) resident advisor on
tax administration, and support the cost of
short-term IMF tax administration specialists
as well as other systems and technology
consultants, the training of BIR staff, and the
procurement of equipment related to the
implementation of eTIS. This sub-Activity
will improve the trustworthiness of data,
increase access to that data, and improve the
actions and decisions based on that data.
From a tax administration perspective these
results can be described as improving
compliance monitoring, reducing client
contact and the concomitant opportunities
for negotiated assessments, increasing the
likelihood of the detection of misreporting,
and improving the value of reports. These are
the components that will contribute to a
sustainable program of tax administration
with improved compliance, audit and
enforcement tools.
(2) Automated Auditing Tools SubActivity.
MCC Funding will purchase software
licenses for automated auditing tools and
provide computers to run them. MCC
Funding will also pay for a subscription to
a data base service to provide BIR with
transfer pricing information and provide
training for the use of these tools. The
automated auditing tools will leverage a
recent BIR decision that requires large
taxpayers to maintain and submit tax records
in digital form and will also expand on a
pilot program sponsored by the Swedish
International Development Agency that
demonstrates the values of these tools. These
auditing tools have demonstrated their
revenue-raising potential, and they also
reduce by half the number of days it takes to
complete an audit. These tools also remove
one taxpayer concern about the fairness of an
audit that is based on sampling rather than
a review of all transactions. The reduction in
man days per audit will help the BIR to
reduce its backlog of unfinished audits.
(3) Public Awareness Campaign SubActivity.
MCC Funding will provide consulting
services and support the costs of
implementing a public awareness campaign
regarding BIR services and programs.
Individuals and businesses in the Philippines
have a limited understanding of their tax
obligations and BIR programs. Many BIR
services—particularly on-line services—are
under-utilized. Greater understanding of tax
obligations, and an increased ability to access
tax information, should lead to better
compliance. It is also hoped that, as with the
eTIS sub-Activity, utilization of on-line
services will reduce the opportunities for
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61207
corruption that in-person transactions may
provide. The public awareness campaign is
intended to promote increased compliance
with tax rules and thus increased revenue
collection through better public and business
awareness of the BIR’s plans, programs,
initiatives, policies and practices.
(ii) RIPS Activity.
MCC Funding will fund the acquisition
and customization of case management
software, a related data depository system,
and training. This will support RIPS, a
relatively new unit within the Department of
Finance, and is intended to strengthen
surveillance and discipline of the
Department of Finance and its attached
agencies through administrative actions such
as temporary suspensions or dismissals.
Experience in MCC’s Philippines Threshold
Program showed that actions taken through
the courts in the Philippines are slow and
that, even when a conviction is secured,
punishment is likely to be deferred and/or
reduced through subsequent appeals. For that
reason, this Activity focuses on trying to
detect and punish those forms of malfeasance
that permit revenue agents to reap financial
rewards from taxpayers. By increasing the
likelihood of detection and punishment, the
frequency of such incidents will decline. If
effective, this should improve the image of
revenue generating agencies and also support
increased collections and improve the
business climate within the Philippines.
(g) Beneficiaries.
Beneficiary analysis for the Revenue
Administration Reform Project is undertaken
at the level of the overall Project since the
incidence of benefits from each Activity is
expected to be spread broadly throughout the
Philippine population. Accordingly,
aggregation at the Project level is reasonable.
Identifying beneficiaries in this broadbased, national program is challenging. It is
reasonable to expect, however, that a
majority of the population of the Philippines
will—due to increased public revenues and
expenditures or domestic investments—enjoy
at least a small increase to their incomes over
the benefits horizon of 2011 to 2030.
Accordingly, MCC estimates (conservatively)
that 85 percent of the country’s population,
which will be approximately 125 million
people, are beneficiaries of this Project by
2030. Consequently, the distribution of the
Revenue Administration Reform Project’s
benefits by poverty level mirrors the national
population’s poverty distribution.
Since rates of access to health and
education services are already relatively high
in the Philippines, most Project impacts will
be realized as increases in quality and
reliability of existing services. As a
consequence, and also due to the large
number of beneficiaries expected for the
project, per-beneficiary benefits are fairly
modest.
(h) Donor Coordination.
The due diligence for the tax
administration aspects of the Revenue
Administration Reform Project was
undertaken in close cooperation with the
IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Division as well as with
the World Bank’s National Program
Supporting Tax Administration Reform
program to support tax reform efforts in the
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
61208
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
Philippines. The outlines of the eTIS subActivity and its emphasis on process
redesign and training are based on longstanding recommendations that have been
made by the IMF and World Bank to the BIR.
It is anticipated that the tax administration
advisors provided to the BIR under the
Compact will be sourced through the IMF
and coordinated by a resident IMF advisor in
Manila, the Philippines.
The Automated Audit Tools sub-Activity
builds on the previous efforts of the Swedish
International Development Agency and the
World Bank. Both donors have sponsored
pilot programs in the utilization of automated
audit tools.
(i) USAID.
MCC’s due diligence relied heavily on the
reports and findings of MCC’s Philippines
Threshold Program administered by USAID.
That program included support for anticorruption activities under the aegis of the
office of the ombudsman, and assistance to
the Department of Finance’s anti-corruption
units, as well as the extension of the
Integrated Tax System (eTIS’ predecessor) to
regional offices that had not previously been
able to implement that system. The lessons
learned under MCC’s Philippines Threshold
Program were the basis for decisions to focus
on internal administrative disciplinary
procedures (the focus of the RIPS Activity)
rather than the pursuit of tax evaders and
smugglers through the courts, to broaden the
scope of tax administration, and to focus
more resources on training and process
redesign than on hardware and software.
(j) Sustainability.
A critical ingredient to the success of this
complex undertaking is the continued
commitment of the Department of Finance to
embark on a program that is likely to meet
with staff as well as taxpayer resistance and
to manage the personnel, organizational and
technical issues that will require both vision
and resolve. Maintaining that commitment
over the course of the Compact Term will be
a test of BIR’s and the Department of
Finance’s management skills and staff
capacity.
(k) Policy, Legal, Regulatory and Other
Reforms.
The Department of Finance has completed
or committed to complete a number of
policy, legal, regulatory and other reforms in
order to achieve success under this Project.
These reforms are referenced in the Compact,
the Program Implementation Agreement, and
in other documents.
4. Implementation Framework
(a) Overview.
The implementation framework and the
plan for ensuring adequate governance,
oversight, management, monitoring and
evaluation, and fiscal accountability for the
use of MCC Funding are summarized below.
MCC and the Government will enter into the
Program Implementation Agreement, and any
other agreements in furtherance of this
Compact, all of which, together with this
Compact, set out certain rights,
responsibilities, duties and other terms
relating to the implementation of the
Program.
(b) MCC.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
MCC will take all appropriate actions to
carry out its responsibilities in connection
with this Compact and the Program
Implementation Agreement, including the
exercise of its approval rights in connection
with the implementation of the Program.
(c) MCA-Philippines.
In accordance with Section 3.2(b) of this
Compact, MCA-Philippines will act on the
Government’s behalf to implement the
Program and to exercise and perform the
Government’s rights and responsibilities with
respect to the oversight, management,
monitoring and evaluation, and
implementation of the Program, including,
without limitation, managing the
implementation of Projects and their
Activities, allocating resources, and
managing procurements. The Government
will ensure that MCA-Philippines takes all
appropriate actions to implement the
Program, including the exercise and
performance of the rights and responsibilities
designated to it by the Government pursuant
to this Compact and the Program
Implementation Agreement. Without limiting
the foregoing, the Government will also
ensure that MCA-Philippines has full
decision-making autonomy, including, inter
alia, the ability, without consultation with, or
the consent or approval of, any other party,
to: (i) Enter into contracts in its own name;
(ii) sue and be sued; (iii) establish Permitted
Accounts in a financial institution in the
name of MCA-Philippines and hold MCC
Funding in such accounts; (iv) expend MCC
Funding; (v) engage a fiscal agent who will
act on behalf of MCA-Philippines on terms
acceptable to MCC; (vi) engage one or more
procurement agents who will act on behalf of
MCA-Philippines, on terms acceptable to
MCC, to manage the acquisition of the goods,
works, and services required by MCAPhilippines to implement this Compact; and
(vii) competitively engage one or more
auditors to conduct audits of its accounts.
The Government will take the necessary
actions to establish and maintain MCAPhilippines, in accordance with the terms
hereof including the applicable conditions
precedent to the Disbursement of Compact
Implementation Funding set forth in Annex
IV to this Compact.
MCA-Philippines will be administered and
managed by a Board of Trustees and a
Management Unit. In addition, MCAPhilippines will have a Stakeholders’
Committee to continue the consultative
process during implementation of the
Program. The governance of MCAPhilippines will be set forth in more detail
in the Establishment Decree, the Program
Implementation Agreement, and the internal
regulations of MCA-Philippines (‘‘MCAPhilippines Bylaws’’), which will,
collectively, set forth the responsibilities of
the Board of Trustees, the Stakeholders’
Committee and the Management Unit. The
MCA-Philippines Bylaws will be developed
and adopted in accordance with MCC’s
Guidelines for Accountable Entities and
Implementation Structures, published on the
MCC Web site (the ‘‘Governance Guidelines’’),
and will be in form and substance
satisfactory to MCC.
(i) Board of Trustees.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Composition. MCA-Philippines will be
governed by a board of trustees (the ‘‘Board
of Trustees’’), which will consist of voting
members representing those Government
departments and civil society and private
sector organizations set forth in the
Establishment Decree and the MCAPhilippines Bylaws. The Board of Trustees
will also consist of those non-voting
observers set forth in the MCA-Philippines
Bylaws. All voting members will be selected
in accordance with the MCA-Philippines
Bylaws and must be sufficiently senior and
qualified to make decisions on behalf of their
respective ministries and civil society and
private sector organizations, as applicable.
Each voting member named to serve on the
Board of Trustees, and any replacement for
any voting member or any alteration of the
size or composition of the Board of Trustees,
will be subject to MCC prior approval.
(2) Roles and Responsibilities. The Board
of Trustees will be responsible for overseeing
the implementation of the Program and will
have final decision-making authority over the
implementation of the Program. The Board of
Trustees will meet regularly; the frequency of
meetings will be set forth in the MCAPhilippines Bylaws and will be in
accordance with the Governance Guidelines.
The specific roles of the voting members and
non-voting observers will be set forth in the
Establishment Decree and the MCAPhilippines Bylaws.
(ii) Stakeholders’ Committee.
(1) Composition. The composition of the
Stakeholders’ Committee will be selected in
accordance with the MCA-Philippines
Bylaws and the Governance Guidelines and
subject to MCC approval (the ‘‘Stakeholders’
Committee’’). Without limiting the foregoing,
the Establishment Decree provides that the
Stakeholders’ Committee will be composed
of, inter alia, representatives from nongovernmental organizations, civil society,
private sector, and local and regional
government Program beneficiaries.
(2) Roles and Responsibilities. Consistent
with the Governance Guidelines, the
Stakeholders’ Committee will be responsible
for continuing the consultative process
throughout implementation of the Program.
While the Stakeholders’ Committee will not
have any decision-making authority, it will
be responsible for, inter alia, reviewing, at
the request of the Board of Trustees or the
Management Unit, certain reports,
agreements, and documents related to the
implementation of the Program in order to
provide advice and input to MCAPhilippines regarding the implementation of
the Program.
(iii) Management Unit.
(1) Composition. The management unit,
which will be led by a competitively selected
Managing Director, will be composed of
competitively selected staff with expertise in
the key components of the Program,
including, without limitation, a KALAHI–
CIDSS Project Director, a Secondary National
Roads Development Director, a Revenue
Administration Reform Director, as well as a
Deputy Managing Director and other key
Directors, including, without limitation, a
Director for Finance, a Director for Legal/
General Counsel, a Director for Procurement,
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61209
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
a Director for Social and Environmental
Assessment, and a Director for Monitoring
and Evaluation, (the ‘‘Management Unit’’).
The Management Unit will also include such
other personnel as provided for in the MCAPhilippines Bylaws. The directors will be
supported by appropriate additional staff to
enable the Management Unit to execute its
roles and responsibilities.
(2) Roles and Responsibilities. The
Management Unit will be based in Manila,
the Philippines, and will be responsible for
managing the day-to-day implementation of
the Program, with oversight from the Board
of Trustees. The Management Unit will serve
as the principal link between MCC and the
Government, and will be accountable for the
successful execution of the Program, each
Project, and each Activity. As a Government
entity, MCA-Philippines will be subject to
Government audit requirements. As a
recipient of MCC Funding, MCA-Philippines
will also be subject to MCC audit
requirements.
(d) Implementing Entities.
Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Compact and any other related agreements
entered into in connection with this
Compact, the Government and MCC have
identified certain principal public
institutions that may or will serve as
implementing entities (each, an
‘‘Implementing Entity’’), to implement and
carry out certain Projects, Activities or
components thereof in furtherance of this
Compact. Any Implementing Entity will be
subject to review and approval by MCC. The
Government will ensure that the roles and
responsibilities of each Implementing Entity
and other appropriate terms are set forth in
an agreement between MCA-Philippines and
each Implementing Entity, which agreement
must be in form and substance satisfactory to
MCC (each an ‘‘Implementing Entity
Agreement’’).
(e) Fiscal Agent.
Unless MCC otherwise agrees in writing,
the Government, directly or through MCAPhilippines, will engage a fiscal agent (a
‘‘Fiscal Agent’’), who will be responsible for
assisting the Government with its fiscal
management and ensure appropriate fiscal
accountability of MCC Funding, and whose
duties will include those set forth in the
Program Implementation Agreement.
(f) Procurement Agent.
Unless MCC otherwise agrees in writing,
the Government, directly or through MCAPhilippines, will engage one or more
procurement agents (each, a ‘‘Procurement
Agent’’) to carry out and certify specified
procurement activities in furtherance of this
Compact. The roles and responsibilities of
each Procurement Agent will be set forth in
the Program Implementation Agreement or
such agreement as the Government, directly
or through MCA-Philippines, enters into with
each Procurement Agent, which agreement
will be in form and substance satisfactory to
MCC. Each Procurement Agent will adhere to
the procurement standards set forth in the
MCC Program Procurement Guidelines and
ensure procurements are consistent with the
procurement plan adopted by MCAPhilippines pursuant to the Program
Implementation Agreement, unless MCC
otherwise agrees in writing.
Annex II Multi-Year Financial Plan
Summary
This Annex II summarizes the multi-year
financial plan for the Program.
1. General
A multi-year financial plan summary
(‘‘Multi-Year Financial Plan Summary’’) is set
forth below. By such time as is specified in
the Program Implementation Agreement, the
Government will adopt, subject to MCC
approval, a multi-year financial plan that
includes, in addition to the multi-year
summary of estimated MCC Funding, the
annual and quarterly funding requirements
for the Program (including administrative
costs) and for each Project, projected both on
a commitment and cash requirement basis.
The Multi-Year Financial Plan Summary
below does not include the contributions by
the Government to the Program.
MULTI-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY
[Millions of US$]
Project
CIF
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Total
7.30
11.50
15.90
9.00
5.60
1.00
50.30
................
0.50
3.35
0.15
................
................
4.00
Sub-Total ...............................................................
7.30
12.00
19.25
9.15
5.60
1.00
54.30
2. KALAHI–CIDSS:
(a) Capacity Building and Implementing Support .........
(b) Grants for Community Projects ...............................
(c) Project Management ...............................................
................
................
2.31
4.91
1.82
3.06
2.84
20.43
2.31
1.48
17.99
1.93
1.11
30.81
1.87
0.28
24.46
2.39
10.62
95.51
13.87
Sub-Total ...............................................................
2.31
9.79
25.58
21.40
33.79
27.13
120.00
3. Secondary National Roads Development Program:
(a) Samar road .............................................................
(b) Environmental and Social Mitigation .......................
Sub-Total ...............................................................
4. Monitoring and Evaluation:
Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................
5.66
5.09
10.75
6.61
6.53
13.14
36.01
0.82
36.83
54.38
0.87
55.25
57.30
0.95
58.25
40.22
................
40.22
200.18
14.26
214.44
0.24
2.13
1.44
1.13
1.59
1.73
8.26
Sub-Total ...............................................................
0.24
2.13
1.44
1.13
1.59
1.73
8.26
5. Compact Administration & Oversight:
(a) Program Administration ...........................................
(b) Program Audits .......................................................
(c) Fiscal Agent .............................................................
(d) Procurement Agent .................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
1. Revenue Administration Reform Project:
(a) BIR Revenue Administration Reform Activity .........
(b) Revenue Integrity Protection Services (RIPS) Activity ...........................................................................
4.46
................
................
................
3.24
0.36
1.50
1.40
3.28
0.46
1.50
1.40
3.33
0.46
1.50
1.10
3.42
0.46
1.50
1.10
3.38
0.46
1.50
1.10
21.11
2.20
7.50
6.10
Sub-Total—Compact Administration & Audit ........
4.46
6.50
6.64
6.39
6.48
6.44
36.91
Total Estimated MCC Contribution ................
25.06
43.56
89.74
93.32
105.71
76.52
433.91
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61210
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
Annex III Description of the Monitoring and
Evaluation Plan
This Annex III (this ‘‘M&E Annex’’)
generally describes the components of the
Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (‘‘M&E
Plan’’) for the Program. The actual content
and form of the M&E Plan will be agreed to
by MCC and the Government in accordance
with the Program Implementation
Agreement. The M&E Plan may be modified
from time to time with MCC approval
without requiring an amendment to this
Annex III.
1. Overview
MCC and the Government will formulate
and agree to, and the Government will
implement, or cause to be implemented, an
M&E Plan that specifies (a) how progress
toward the Compact Goal, Program Objective
and Project Objectives will be monitored
(‘‘Monitoring Component’’), (b) a process and
timeline for the monitoring of planned,
ongoing, or completed Activities to
determine their efficiency and effectiveness,
and (c) a methodology for assessment and
rigorous evaluation of the outcomes and
impact of the Program (‘‘Evaluation
Component’’). Information regarding the
Program’s performance, including the M&E
Plan, and any amendments or modifications
thereto, as well as progress, evaluation, and
other reports, will be made publicly available
on the Web site of MCA-Philippines and
elsewhere.
2. Program Logic
The M&E Plan will be built on a logic
model which illustrates how the Program,
Projects and Activities contribute to the
Compact Goal, the Program Objective and the
Project Objectives. The goal of this Compact
is to reduce poverty through economic
growth. The Program Objective is to (a)
increase the incomes of Filipinos through the
benefits of community-driven sub-projects,
(b) obtain time savings and lower
transportation costs for road users in Program
areas, and (c) increase investment and
government expenditure due to an increase
in tax revenue and a reduction in corruption.
The corresponding Project Objectives are:
(a) The KALAHI–CIDSS Project expects to
improve the responsiveness of local
governments to community needs, encourage
communities to engage in development
activities and deliver benefits to barangay
residents through the individual sub-projects.
(b) The Secondary National Roads
Development Project expects to lower vehicle
operating costs and save the time of those
Filipinos living near the roads.
(c) The Revenue Administration Reform
Project expects to increase tax revenues over
time and support the Department of
Finance’s initiatives to detect and deter
corruption within its revenue agencies.
3. Monitoring Component
To monitor progress toward the
achievement of the desired impact and
outcomes of the Compact, the Monitoring
Component of the M&E Plan will identify (a)
the Indicators (as defined below), (b) the
definitions of the Indicators, (c) the sources
and methods for data collection, (d) the
frequency for data collection, (e) the party or
parties responsible, and (f) the timeline for
reporting on each Indicator to MCC.
Further, the Monitoring Component will
track changes in the selected Indicators as a
means for measuring progress towards the
achievement of the objectives during the
Compact Term. The M&E Plan will establish
baselines which measure the situation prior
to a development intervention, against which
progress can be assessed or comparisons
made (including evaluations and special
studies) (each, a ‘‘Baseline’’). MCAPhilippines will collect Baselines on the
selected Indicators or verify already collected
Baselines where applicable and as set forth
in the M&E Plan.
(a) Indicators. The M&E Plan will measure
the results of the Program using quantitative,
objective and reliable data (‘‘Indicators’’).
Each Indicator will have benchmarks that
specify the expected value and the expected
time by which that result will be achieved
(‘‘Target’’). The M&E Plan will be prepared in
accordance with the MCC Policy for
Monitoring and Evaluation of Compacts and
Threshold Programs. All Indicators will be
disaggregated by gender, income level and
age, and beneficiary types to the extent
practicable. Subject to prior written approval
from MCC, MCA-Philippines may add
Indicators or refine the definitions and
Targets of existing Indicators.
(i) Compact Indicators.
(1) Goal. The M&E Plan will contain the
following Indicators related to the Compact
Goal. These Indicators of national goals are
specified in the ‘‘Medium-Term Philippine
Development Plan’’ to which the Projects
contributes, but are not solely attributable to
the Projects:
(A) Annual growth in Gross National
Product.
(B) Percent of households living below the
subsistence poverty line.
(2) Other Indicators. The M&E Plan will
contain the Indicators listed in the following
tables.
TABLE 1—M&E INDICATORS FOR KALAHI–CIDSS PROJECT
Result
Indicator
Definition of indicator
Baseline 4
Year 5 5
Objective Level
Increased responsiveness of Local
Government Units (LGUs) to community needs.
Use of inclusive Community Driven
Development (CDD) processes by
local governments.
LGU provision of funds for O&M ......
LGU application of CDD practices to
non-KALAHI–CIDSS activities.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Increased community engagement in
development activities.
Participation of women in local government.
Community engagement in development activities.
4 As the municipalities are due to be randomly
selected, baseline figures are not yet known.
5 These figures are indicative.
6 The baseline levels for these indicators will be
determined by the initial round of data collection
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Percentage of project municipal local
government units (MLGUs) that
have meetings with community
representatives to solicit inputs to
municipal development plans and/
or percentage of barangays that
reflect community priorities in their
barangay development plans.
Percentage of MLGUs that provide
funding support for KALAHI–
CIDSS sub-project O&M.
Number of project MLGUs that pass
ordinances/resolutions
adopting
CDD principles.
Number of women representatives in
targeted areas.
Percentage
of
MCC-funded
KALAHI–CIDSS-developed community organizations that have
satisfactory organizational performance ratings.
in the selected municipalities. The targets will be
informed by this information and by the results of
the endline data collection in KC1 areas.
7 The precise indicators, definitions, baseline
level and final targets will be determined by the
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TBD
80%
0%
80%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0%
80%
initial round of data collection in the selected
control and treatment municipalities. The targets
will be informed by this information and by the
results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61211
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 1—M&E INDICATORS FOR KALAHI–CIDSS PROJECT—Continued
Result
Indicator
Increased value of sub-project benefits 6.
Baseline 4
Definition of indicator
Aggregate value of benefits of subprojects..
Percentage of communities that attract additional funding for development
activities
after
the
KALAHI–CIDSS Project is completed.
(Varies, please see below) ...............
Year 5 5
0%
30%
....................
....................
0%
90%
0%
90%
TBD
80%
TBD
80%
TBD
TBD
...........................................................
TBD
TBD
...........................................................
...........................................................
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0
3400
0%
80%
Outcome Level
Increased LGU engagement .............
LGU provision of funds .....................
LGU provision of technical support ..
Increased community engagement ...
Barangay assembly participation .....
Marginalized group participation ......
Increased value of sub-project benefits 7.
Time savings ....................................
Labor force participation (by age and
gender).
School enrollment .............................
Number of beneficiary farming
households.
Yield of paddy rice ............................
Water consumption (by use) ............
Use of barangay health facilities ......
Post-harvest losses ..........................
Percentage of LGUs that provide at
least 80% of Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) funding requirements.
Percentage of LGUs that provide at
least 80% of MOA technical support requirements.
Percentage of barangay assemblies
with 80% of community households represented.
Percentage of barangay assemblies
with 65% of youth, women, indigenous people and poorest households represented.
...........................................................
Output Level
Sub-projects delivered ......................
Sub-projects completed ....................
Sub-projects sustained ......................
Sub-projects sustained .....................
Number of completed sub-projects
(by type).
Percentage of sub-projects that pass
functionality audits or receive satisfactory or higher ratings of sustainability.
TABLE 2—M&E INDICATORS FOR SECONDARY NATIONAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Result
Indicator
Definition of indicator
Road
Baseline
Year 5
Year 20
Objective Level
Net incomes of road
users increased.
Costs to road users .......
Aggregate value of time
savings (in
2009US$m) 8.
Change in aggregate vehicle operating cost (in
2009US$m) 9.
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
NA
5.2
9.5
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
NA
9.4
16.5
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
10 7.1
1.8
5.8
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
1,179
1,450
2,720
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
NA
0.4
0.3
Outcome Level
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Improved road quality .....
Roughness .....................
Increased vehicle activity
Average Annual Daily
Traffic (AADT).
Lower maintenance costs
Maintenance savings .....
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
International Roughness
Index of the road segments supported by
the Compact.
AADT on the road segments supported by
the Compact.
Reduction in annual
maintenance spending
(in 2009US$m) 11.
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 2—M&E INDICATORS FOR SECONDARY NATIONAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT—Continued
Result
Indicator
Definition of indicator
Road
Baseline
Year 5
Year 20
Output Level
Roads rehabilitated or
built.
Total length ....................
KM of road sections
completed—rehabilitated.
Wright-Taft- BoronganGuiuan.
0
222
222
TABLE 3—M&E INDICATORS FOR REVENUE ADMINISTRATION REFORM PROJECT
Result
Indicator
Definition of indicator
Baseline
Year 5
Project-wide Indicators
Objective Level
Increased tax revenues over time .......
Tax gap ..............................................
Decreased incidence of corrupt activities within Department of Finance
(DOF).
Perceptions of corruption ..................
12 TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
0
TBD
Average collection per firm using
Automated Audit Tools AATs (in
pesos).
2,500,000
4,300,000
Calendar days from start of audit to
completion.
Large taxpayer unit audit cases performed using only AATS.
Hours to perform all audit functions
needed at taxpayer premises.
117
44
2.9%
100%
335
50
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Percentage of tax potential that is
actually collected (VAT only).
DOF staff and the general public’s
perceptions that DOF staff are engaged in corrupt activities.
Perceptions that DOF is taking action
to fight corruption.
eTIS sub-Activity
Outcome Level
Increased number of returns ...............
Number of returns filed ......................
Corruption perceptions ........................
Perceptions of change in incidence
of corruption among BIR employees.
Perceptions of organizational efficiency among BIR employees.
Efficiency perceptions .........................
Number of tax returns filed by individuals and corporate business at
BIR Revenue District Offices that
have implemented eTIS.
Perceptions of corruption as specifically related to eTIS implementation e.g. use of electronic audit.
Perceptions of efficiency as specifically related to eTIS implementation.
Output Level
Increased number of automaticallygenerated audits.
Number of audits ...............................
Automatically-generated (by eTIS)
audits broken down by large taxpayer unit and RDOs that have implemented eTIS.
Automated Audit Tools (AATs) sub-Activity
Outcome Level
Increased revenue ...............................
Revenue collection per audit .............
Output Level
Time to complete an audit .................
Increased percentage of audits using
AATS.
Reduced opportunities for discretion ..
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Decreased time to complete an audit
Percentage of audit cases performed
using AATS.
Time spent at taxpayer premises per
audit.
Public Awareness Campaign sub-Activity
Outcome Level
Increased revenue ...............................
Revenue from target group ...............
Increased satisfaction ..........................
Taxpayer satisfaction with BIR services.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Target group to be defined based on
project type.
Improvement in customer satisfaction
survey scores.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61213
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 3—M&E INDICATORS FOR REVENUE ADMINISTRATION REFORM PROJECT—Continued
Result
Indicator
Definition of indicator
Increased awareness ..........................
Perception of change based on specific message.
Awareness of the campaign, the
available BIR services and/or taxpayer obligations.
Baseline
Year 5
TBD
TBD
28
140
TBD
TBD
Number of cases opened ..................
110
400
Days from case opened to resolution
120
60
Number of DOF personnel charged
with either graft or corruption.
67
500
RIPS Activity
Outcome Level
Increased number of resolved cases ..
Number of ‘‘successful’’ case resolutions (cumulative).
Corruption perceptions ........................
Perceptions of corrupt activities within DOF agencies.
Number of personnel charged by
RIPS who are then suspended,
dismissed or convicted.
Perceptions among DOF staff and
the general public.
Output Level
Increased number of investigations ....
Decreased time to complete an investigation.
Increased number of DOF personnel
charged.
Number of complaints investigated
(cumulative).
Time taken to complete investigation
(average).
Personnel charged (cumulative) ........
Note: Many of these indicators are in draft form as the development of a full set of indicators, baselines and targets is proposed as part of the
eTIS sub-Activity and the Public Awareness Campaign sub-Activity. For indicators of perceptions of corruption, a baseline survey will be developed and conducted as soon as possible and the indicators and corresponding targets will be developed for relevant sub-Activities at that time.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(b) Data Collection and Reporting. The
M&E Plan will establish guidelines for data
collection and reporting, and identify the
responsible parties. Compliance with data
collection and reporting timelines will be
conditions for Disbursements for the relevant
Activities as set forth in the Program
Implementation Agreement. The M&E Plan
will specify the data collection
methodologies, procedures, and analysis
required for reporting on results at all levels.
The M&E Plan will describe any interim MCC
approvals for data collection, analysis, and
reporting plans.
(c) Data Quality Reviews. As determined in
the M&E Plan or as otherwise requested by
MCC, the quality of the data gathered through
the M&E Plan will be reviewed to ensure that
data reported are as valid, reliable, and
8 These indicators are defined as the actual cost
or spending minus what they were estimated to be
in the without project scenario, as calculated by the
model of the feasibility study.
9 These indicators are defined as the actual cost
or spending minus what they were estimated to be
in the without project scenario, as calculated by the
Highway Development and Management 4 model
used by the feasibility study. These indicators will
not be measured directly in year 5 of the Compact.
Instead they will be recalculated using the same
model, based on actual data on traffic, roughness,
and maintenance spending (see below).
10 This baseline is a visual estimation, not an
International Roughness Index measure.
11 These indicators are defined as the actual cost
or spending minus what they were estimated to be
in the without project scenario, as calculated by the
model of the feasibility study.
12 There have been several calculations of the
VAT tax gap in the last 15 years and these have
produced a wide range of estimates depending on
the methodology employed. We are aware of no
more recent estimate by the IMF than 1999, when
it was estimated at 50%. The IMF will be
responsible for producing a more current baseline
figure for the tax gap indicator.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
timely as resources will allow. The objective
of any data quality review will be to verify
the quality and the consistency of
performance data across different
implementation units and reporting
institutions. Such data quality reviews also
will serve to identify where those levels of
quality are not possible, given the realities of
data collection.
(d) Management Information System. The
M&E Plan will describe the information
system that will be used to collect data, store,
process and deliver information to relevant
stakeholders in such a way that the Program
information collected and verified pursuant
to the M&E Plan is at all times accessible and
useful to those who wish to use it. The
system development will take into
consideration the requirement and data
needs of the components of the Program, and
will be aligned with existing MCC systems,
other service providers, and relevant
Implementing Entities.
(e) Role of MCA-Philippines. The
monitoring and evaluation of this Compact
spans discrete Projects and will involve a
variety of governmental, non-governmental,
and private sector institutions. Subject to
Section 3.2(b) of the Compact, MCAPhilippines is responsible for
implementation of the M&E Plan. MCAPhilippines will oversee all Compact-related
monitoring and evaluation activities
conducted for each of the Projects, ensuring
that data from all implementing entities is
consistent, accurately reported and
aggregated into regular Compact performance
reports as described in the M&E Plan.
4. Evaluation Component
The evaluation component of the M&E
Plan will contain three types of evaluations:
(a) Impact evaluations; (b) final evaluations;
and (c) special studies. The evaluation
component of the M&E Plan will describe the
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
purpose of the evaluation, methodology,
timeline, required MCC approvals, and the
process for collection and analysis of data for
each evaluation. The results of all
evaluations will be made publicly available
in accordance with MCC’s guidelines for
monitoring and evaluation plans posted from
time to time on the MCC Web site (the ‘‘MCC
Policy for Monitoring and Evaluation of
Compacts and Threshold Programs’’).
(a) Impact Evaluation. The M&E Plan will
include a description of the methods to be
used for impact evaluations and plans for
integrating the evaluation method into
Project design. Based on in-country
consultation with stakeholders, the strategies
outlined below were jointly determined as
having the strongest potential for rigorous
impact evaluation. The M&E Plan will further
outline in detail these methodologies. Final
impact evaluation strategies are to be
included in the M&E Plan. The following is
a summary of the current impact evaluation
methodology:
(i) KALAHI–CIDSS Project.
The planned impact evaluation will cover
new municipalities across both MCCsupported and World Bank-supported areas.
Although the final design and
implementation of the impact evaluation will
be contracted to an independent consultant
firm, a joint advisory board, with members
from MCC, MCA-Philippines, the World
Bank, DSWD, the National Economic
Development Agency, and local academics
will oversee the impact evaluation, which
will be made publically available upon
completion.
MCC and the World Bank cannot provide
sufficient funding for all eligible
municipalities. Thus the proposed approach
will randomly select some pairs of
municipalities to serve as treatment and
controls from the eligible list. The specific
municipalities will be randomly selected
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
61214
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
from that list by an independent party.
Several of the Government’s obligations are
related to the methodology and
implementation of this Impact Evaluation.
Key Impact Evaluation questions will
include: How does receiving KALAHI–CIDSS
support (from either the KALAHI–CIDSS
Project or KC1) influence individual and
community measures of:
(1) Social capital (participation in
meetings, membership in groups, trust, etc);
(2) Welfare (consumption expenditure,
labor force participation (including for
women), hours on household production,
enrollment, etc.); and
(3) The link between social capital and
welfare (operations and maintenance
practices, sustainability, project costs,
congruence of preferences with sub-projects
selected, etc.).
(ii) Secondary National Roads
Development Project.
A rigorous impact evaluation is not
currently planned for the Secondary National
Roads Development Project due to the
lengthy time of construction and the
corresponding time required for the economy
to adapt to the improvement.
(b) Final Evaluation. The M&E Plan will
make provision for final Project level
evaluations (‘‘Final Evaluations’’). With the
prior written approval of MCC, MCAPhilippines will engage independent
evaluators to conduct the Final Evaluations
at the end of each Project. The Final
Evaluations will review progress during
Compact implementation and provide a
qualitative context for interpreting
monitoring data and impact evaluation
findings. They must at a minimum (i)
evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of
the Activities, (ii) determine if and analyze
the reasons why the Compact Goal, Program
Objective and Project Objective(s),
outcome(s) and output(s) were or were not
achieved, (iii) identify positive and negative
unintended results of the Program, (iv)
provide lessons learned that may be applied
to similar projects, and (v) assess the
likelihood that results will be sustained over
time.
(c) Special Studies. The M&E Plan will
include a description of the methods to be
used for special studies, as necessary, funded
through this Compact or by MCC. Plans for
conducting the special studies will be
determined jointly between MCA-Philippines
and MCC before the approval of the M&E
Plan. The M&E Plan will identify and make
provision for any other special studies, ad
hoc evaluations, and research that may be
needed as part of the monitoring and
evaluating of this Compact. Either MCC or
MCA-Philippines may request special studies
or ad hoc evaluations of Projects, Activities,
or the Program as a whole prior to the
expiration of the Compact Term. When MCAPhilippines engages an evaluator, the
engagement will be subject to the prior
written approval of MCC. Contract terms
must ensure non-biased results and the
publication of results.
As of the date hereof, two special studies
are planned: For the KALAHI–CIDSS Project,
an evaluation is planned to measure the
various benefits of the sub-projects; for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Secondary National Roads Development
Project, evaluations are planned to focus on
measuring changes in travel times and
transportation costs.
(i) Request for Ad Hoc Evaluation or
Special Study. If MCA-Philippines requires
an ad hoc independent evaluation or special
study at the request of the Government for
any reason, including for the purpose of
contesting an MCC determination with
respect to a Project or Activity or to seek
funding from other donors, no MCC Funding
or MCA-Philippines resources may be
applied to such evaluation or special study
without MCC’s prior written approval.
5. Other Components of the M&E Plan
In addition to the monitoring and
evaluation components, the M&E Plan will
include the following components for the
Program, Projects and Activities, including,
where appropriate, roles and responsibilities
of the relevant parties and providers:
(a) Costs. A detailed cost estimate for all
components of the M&E Plan; and
(b) Assumptions and Risks. Any
assumption or risk external to the Program
that underlies the accomplishment of the
Program Objective, Project Objectives and
Activity outcomes and outputs. However,
such assumptions and risks will not excuse
any Party’s performance unless otherwise
expressly agreed to in writing by the Parties.
6. Approval and Implementation of the M&E
Plan
The approval and implementation of the
M&E Plan, as amended from time to time,
will be in accordance with the Program
Implementation Agreement and any other
relevant supplemental agreement, and the
MCC Policy for Monitoring and Evaluation of
Compacts and Threshold Programs.
Annex IV Conditions to Disbursement of
Compact Implementation Funding
This Annex IV sets forth the conditions
precedent applicable to Disbursements of
Compact Implementation Funding (each a
‘‘CIF Disbursement’’). Capitalized terms used
in this Annex IV and not defined in this
Annex IV or in the Compact have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the
Program Implementation Agreement.
1. Conditions to the Initial CIF Disbursement
Each of the following conditions precedent
must have been met to MCC’s satisfaction
prior to the initial CIF Disbursement:
(a) MCA-Philippines will have delivered to
MCC a complete, correct, and fully executed
Disbursement Request for the relevant
Disbursement Period, in form and substance
satisfactory to MCC and submitted in
accordance with the Reporting Guidelines.
Each Disbursement Request will include the
following reference number: GR10PHL10010.
(b)(i) Each Activity being funded by such
CIF Disbursement will facilitate
implementation of the Compact, (ii) there has
been no violation of, and the use of the
requested funds for the purposes requested
will not violate, the limitations on the use or
treatment of (1) MCC Funding, as set forth in
this Compact, including under Section 2.7, or
(2) Compact Implementation Funding, and
(iii) no material breach of any covenant,
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
obligation, or responsibility of the
Government or MCA-Philippines under this
Compact, the Program Implementation
Agreement, any supplemental agreement, or
any Program Guidelines has occurred or is
continuing.
(c) The Government will have published
the Establishment Decree, and such decree
will remain in full force and effect, without
modification, alteration, rescission, or
suspension of any kind unless otherwise
agreed by MCC. Without limitation of the
foregoing, MCA-Philippines will have
delivered to MCC (i) evidence of the adoption
and publication of the Establishment Decree,
and (ii) an up-to-date extract from the state
registry verifying that MCA-Philippines is a
fully-formed and registered public institution
under the laws of the Philippines.
(d) MCA-Philippines will be sufficiently
mobilized in order for MCA-Philippines to be
able to fully perform its obligations and to act
on behalf of the Government.
(e) MCA-Philippines will have adopted a
Procurement Plan, in form and substance
satisfactory to MCC, with respect to the
Compact Implementation Funding, and such
Procurement Plan remains in full force and
effect.
(f) MCA-Philippines will have adopted a
Fiscal Accountability Plan, in form and
substance satisfactory to MCC, and such
Fiscal Accountability Plan remains in full
force and effect.
(g) The Government will have adopted and
published such decrees and regulations as
necessary to implement the tax assumption
mechanisms set forth in the Program
Implementation Agreement, and such
decrees and regulations will remain in full
force and effect without modification,
alteration, rescission, or suspension of any
kind, unless otherwise agreed by MCC.
(h) The Fiscal Agent will have been duly
appointed, and MCA-Philippines will have
duly executed the Fiscal Agent Agreement,
and such agreement will be in full force and
effect without modification, alteration,
rescission, or suspension of any kind, unless
otherwise agreed by MCC, and no material
breach has occurred or is continuing
thereunder.
(i) The Procurement Agent will have been
duly appointed, and MCA-Philippines will
have duly executed an agreement with the
Procurement Agent, and such agreement will
be in full force and effect without
modification, alteration, rescission, or
suspension of any kind, unless otherwise
agreed by MCC, and no material breach has
occurred or is continuing thereunder.
(j) The Bank will have been duly
appointed, and MCA-Philippines and the
Fiscal Agent will have duly executed the
Bank Agreement, and such agreement will be
in full force and effect without modification,
alteration, rescission, or suspension of any
kind, unless otherwise agreed by MCC, and
no material breach has occurred or is
continuing thereunder.
(k) The Permitted Account will be
established.
(l) Prior to the deployment of the resident
tax administration technical assistance lead
advisor, the IMF resident advisor will be
designated as a senior advisor to the head of
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
the BIR’s Project Implementation &
Monitoring Office. Said resident advisor will
coordinate all tax administration-related
technical assistance from all donors.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2. Conditions to Each CIF Disbursement
Each of the following conditions precedent
must have been met to MCC’s satisfaction
prior to the applicable CIF Disbursement:
(a) MCA-Philippines will have delivered to
MCC a complete, correct, and fully executed
Disbursement Request for the relevant
Disbursement Period, together with any
applicable Periodic Reports covering such
Disbursement Period, in each case in form
and substance satisfactory to MCC and
submitted in accordance with the Reporting
Guidelines. Each Disbursement Request will
include the following reference number:
GR10PHL10010.
(b)(i) Each Activity being funded by such
CIF Disbursement will facilitate
implementation of the Compact, (ii) there has
been no violation of, and the use of the
requested funds for the purposes requested
will not violate, the limitations on the use or
treatment of (1) MCC Funding, as set forth in
this Compact, including under Section 2.7, or
(2) Compact Implementation Funding, (iii) no
material breach of any covenant, obligation,
or responsibility of the Government or MCAPhilippines under this Compact, the Program
Implementation Agreement, any
supplemental agreement, or any Program
Guidelines has occurred or is continuing, and
(iv) any Taxes and Contributions paid with
MCC Funding prior to or on the date ninety
(90) days prior to the start of the applicable
Disbursement Period have been assumed by
the Government in full in accordance with
this Compact.
(c) The MCA-Philippines Procurement
Plan will be in full force and effect.
(d) The MCA-Philippines Fiscal
Accountability Plan will be in full force and
effect.
(e) Each of the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the
MCA-Philippines agreement with the
Procurement Agent, and the Bank Agreement
will be in full force and effect without
modification, alteration, rescission, or
suspension of any kind, unless otherwise
agreed by MCC, and no material breach has
occurred or is continuing thereunder.
(f) The Permitted Account will be in
existence.
(g) The tax assumption mechanism set
forth in the Program Implementation
Agreement will be in full force and effect.
Annex V Definitions
Activity has the meaning provided in Part
B of Annex I.
Additional Representative has the meaning
provided in Section 4.2.
Audit Guidelines has the meaning
provided in Section 3.8(a).
Baseline has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3 of Annex III.
BIR has the meaning provided in paragraph
3(a) of Part B of Annex I.
Board of Trustees has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(c)(i)(1) of Part B of
Annex I.
CIF Disbursement has the meaning
provided in Annex IV.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Compact has the meaning provided in the
Preamble.
Compact Goal has the meaning provided in
Section 1.1.
Compact Implementation Funding has the
meaning provided in Section 2.2(a).
Compact Records has the meaning
provided in Section 3.7(a).
Compact Term has the meaning provided
in Section 7.3.
Covered Provider has the meaning
provided in Section 3.7(c).
Disbursement has the meaning provided in
Section 2.4.
DSWD has the meaning provided in
Section 8.1(a)(i).
Establishment Decree has the meaning
provided in Section 3.2(b).
eTIS has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3(b) of Part B of Annex I.
Evaluation Component has the meaning
provided in paragraph 1 of Annex III.
Excess CIF Amount has the meaning
provided in Section 2.2(d).
Final Evaluations has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(b) of Annex III.
Fiscal Agent has the meaning provided in
paragraph 4(e) of Part B of Annex I.
Governance Guidelines has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(c) of Part B of Annex
I.
Government has the meaning provided in
the Preamble.
IMF has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3(b)(i)(1) of Part B of
Annex I.
Implementation Letter has the meaning
provided in Section 3.5.
Implementing Entity has the meaning
provided paragraph 4(d) of Part B of
Annex I.
Implementing Entity Agreement has the
meaning provided in paragraph 4(d) of Part
B of Annex I.
Indicators has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3(a) of Annex III.
Inspector General has the meaning
provided in Section 3.8(a).
KALAHI–CIDSS has the meaning provided
in paragraph 1(a) of Part B of Annex I.
KALAHI–CIDSS Project has the meaning
provided in paragraph 1(a) of Part B of Annex
I.
KC1 has the meaning provided in
paragraph 1(a) of Part B of Annex I.
M&E Annex has the meaning provided in
Annex III.
M&E Plan has the meaning provided in
Annex III.
Management Unit has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(c)(iii)(1) of Part B of
Annex I.
MCA Act has the meaning provided in
Section 2.2(a).
MCA-Philippines has the meaning
provided in Section 3.2(b).
MCA-Philippines Bylaws has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(c) of Part B of Annex
I.
MCC has the meaning provided in the
Preamble.
MCC Environmental Guidelines has the
meaning provided in Section 2.7(c).
MCC Funding has the meaning provided in
Section 2.3.
MCC Policy for Monitoring and Evaluation
of Compacts and Threshold Programs has the
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61215
meaning provided for in paragraph 4 of
Annex III.
MCC Program Procurement Guidelines has
the meaning provided in Section 3.6.
MCC Web site has the meaning provided in
Section 2.7.
Monitoring Component has the meaning
provided in paragraph 1 of Annex III.
Multi-Year Financial Plan Summary has
the meaning provided in paragraph 1 of
Annex II.
OP 4.12 has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3 of Part A of Annex I.
Party and Parties has the meaning
provided in the Preamble.
Permitted Account has the meaning
provided in Section 2.4.
The Philippines has the meaning provided
in the Preamble.
Principal Representative has the meaning
provided in Section 4.2.
Procurement Agent has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(f) of Part B of Annex
I.
Program has the meaning provided in the
Preamble.
Program Assets include MCC Funding,
interest accrued thereon, and any assets,
goods or property (real, tangible or
intangible) purchased or financed in whole
or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC
Funding.
Program Funding has the meaning
provided in Section 2.1.
Program Guidelines means collectively the
Audit Guidelines, the MCC Environmental
Guidelines, the Governance Guidelines, the
MCC Program Procurement Guidelines, the
Reporting Guidelines, the MCC Policy for
Monitoring and Evaluation of Compacts and
Threshold Programs, and any other
guidelines, policies or guidance papers from
time to time published on the MCC Web site.
Program Implementation Agreement or PIA
has the meaning provided in Section 3.1.
Program Objective has the meaning
provided in Section 1.2.
Project(s) has the meaning provided in
Section 6.2(b).
Project Objective(s) has the meaning
provided in Section 1.3.
Provider has the meaning provided in
Section 3.7(c).
Reporting Guidelines means the MCC
‘‘Guidance on Quarterly MCA Disbursement
Request and Reporting Package’’ posted by
MCC on the MCC Web site or otherwise
publicly made available.
Revenue Administration Reform Project
has the meaning provided in paragraph 3(b)
of Part B of Annex I.
RIPS has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3(b) of Part B of Annex I.
Secondary National Roads Development
Project has the meaning provided in
paragraph 2(b) of Part B of Annex I.
Stakeholders’ Committee has the meaning
provided in paragraph 4(c)(ii)(1) of Part B of
Annex I.
Target has the meaning provided in
paragraph 3(a) of Annex III.
Taxes and Contributions has the meaning
provided in Section 2.8.
United States Dollars or US$ means the
lawful currency of the United States of
America.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61216
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
USAID has the meaning provided in
paragraph 1(e) of Part B of Annex I.
[FR Doc. 2010–24820 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9211–03–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 10–12]
Report on the Selection of Eligible
Countries for Fiscal Year 2011
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This report is provided in
accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003,
Public Law 108–199, Division D, (the
‘‘Act’’), 22 U.S.C. 7708(d)(1).
SUMMARY:
Dated: September 28, 2010.
Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Report on the Criteria and Methodology
for Determining the Eligibility of
Candidate Countries for Millennium
Challenge Account Assistance for Fiscal
Year 2011
This report to Congress is provided in
accordance with section 608(b) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as
amended, 22 U.S.C. 7707(b) (the ‘‘Act’’).
The Act authorizes the provision of
Millennium Challenge Account (MCA)
assistance to countries that enter into a
Millennium Challenge Compact with
the United States to support policies
and programs that advance the
prospects of such countries achieving
lasting economic growth and poverty
reduction. The Act requires the
Millennium Challenge Corporation
(MCC) to take a number of steps in
determining what countries will be
selected as eligible for MCA compact
assistance for fiscal year 2011 (FY11)
based on the countries’ demonstrated
commitment to just and democratic
governance, economic freedom, and
investing in their people, as well as
MCC’s opportunity to reduce poverty
and generate economic growth in the
country. These steps include the
submission of reports to the
congressional committees specified in
the Act and publication of notices in the
Federal Register that identify:
The countries that are ‘‘candidate
countries’’ for MCA assistance for FY11
based on their per capita income levels
and their eligibility to receive assistance
under U.S. law. This report also
identifies countries that would be
candidate countries but for specified
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
legal prohibitions on assistance (section
608(a) of the Act; 22 U.S.C. 7707(a));
The criteria and methodology that
MCC’s Board of Directors (Board) will
use to measure and evaluate the policy
performance of the candidate countries
consistent with the requirements of
section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706)
in order to determine ‘‘MCA eligible
countries’’ from among the ‘‘candidate
countries’’ (section 608(b) of the Act);
and
The list of countries determined by
the Board to be ‘‘MCA eligible countries’’
for FY11, with justification for
eligibility determination and selection
for compact negotiation, including with
which of the MCA eligible countries the
Board will seek to enter into MCA
compacts (section 608(d) of the Act).
This report is the second of the three
required reports listed above.
sources are set out in the attached
Annex A). These indicators are grouped
for purposes of the FY11 assessment
methodology under the three policy
categories listed below.
Criteria and Methodology for FY11
The Board will base its selection of
eligible countries on several factors
including:
The country’s overall performance in
three broad policy categories—Ruling
Justly, Encouraging Economic Freedom,
and Investing in People; MCC’s
opportunity to reduce poverty and
generate economic growth in a country;
and Availability of funds to MCC.
Public Expenditure on Health
Public Expenditure on Primary
Education
Immunization Rates
Girls’ Primary Education Completion
Natural Resource Management
In making its determination of
eligibility with respect to a particular
candidate country, the Board will
consider whether a country performs
above the median in relation to its
income level peers (LIC or LMIC) on at
least three of the indicators in each of
the Ruling Justly, Encouraging
Economic Freedom, and Investing in
People categories, and above the median
on the Control of Corruption indicator.
One exception to this methodology is
that the median is not used for the
Inflation indicator. Instead, to pass the
Inflation indicator a country’s inflation
rate must be under a fixed ceiling of 15
percent. The Board may also take into
consideration whether a country
performs substantially below the
median on any indicator (i.e., below the
25th percentile) and has not taken
appropriate measures to address this
shortcoming.
Performance of Policy Categories
Section 607 of the Act requires that
the Board’s determination of eligibility
be based ‘‘to the maximum extent
possible, upon objective and
quantifiable indicators of a country’s
demonstrated commitment’’ to the
criteria set out in the Act. For FY11,
there will be two groups of candidate
countries—low income countries (LIC)
and lower middle income countries
(LMIC). As outlined in MCC’s Report on
Countries that are Candidate Countries
for Millennium Challenge Account
Eligibility for Fiscal Year 2011 and
Countries that would be Candidates but
or Legal Prohibitions (August 2010), LIC
candidates are those countries that have
a per capita income equal to or less than
$1,905 and are not ineligible to receive
United States economic assistance
under part I of the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961 by reason of the application
of any provision of the Foreign Assistant
Act or any other provision of law. LMIC
candidates are those countries that have
a per capita income between $1,906 and
$3,945 and are not ineligible to receive
United States economic assistance
under the same stipulations.
The Board uses seventeen indicators
to assess the policy performance of
individual countries (specific
definitions of the indicators and their
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ruling Justly
Civil Liberties
Political Rights
Voice and Accountability
Government Effectiveness
Rule of Law
Control of Corruption
Encouraging Economic Freedom
Inflation
Fiscal Policy
Business Start-up
Trade Policy
Regulatory Quality
Land Rights Access
Investing in People
Approach to Income Classification
Transition
Each year a number of countries shift
income groups, and some countries
formerly classified as LICs suddenly
face new, higher performance standards
in the LMIC group. As a result, they
typically perform relatively worse as an
LMIC, even if they performed relatively
well as an LIC, and maintained or
improved performance over the
previous year in absolute terms. To
address the challenges associated with
sudden changes in performance
standards for these countries, MCC has
adopted an approach to income category
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61197-61216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24820]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
[MCC FR 10-11]
Notice of Entering Into a Compact With the Republic of the
Philippines
AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 610(b)(2) of the Millennium
Challenge Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-199, Division D), the Millennium
Challenge Corporation (MCC) is publishing a summary and the complete
text of the Millennium Challenge Compact between the United States of
America, acting through the Millennium Challenge Corporation, and the
Republic of the Philippines. Representatives of the United States
Government and the Republic of the Philippines executed the Compact
documents on September 23, 2010.
Dated: September 29, 2010.
Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
Summary of Millennium Challenge Compact With the Republic of the
Philippines
The five-year Millennium Challenge Compact with the Republic of the
Philippines (``Compact'') will provide up to $433,910,000 million to
reduce poverty and accelerate economic growth. The Compact is intended
to support: (i) Reforms and investments to modernize the Bureau of
Internal Revenue to increase fiscal space for public investment and to
reduce opportunities for corruption in tax administration; (ii)
expansion and improvement of a community-driven development project,
Kalahi-CIDSS; and (iii) rehabilitation of a secondary national road in
Samar province.
Revenue Administration Reform Project ($54.3 million)
The Revenue Administration Reform Project addresses two problems:
(i) the need to raise tax revenues and (ii) the need to reduce tax
evasion and revenue agent-related corruption. A key constraint to
economic growth in the Philippines is the lack of fiscal space for
growth-enhancing investments in public goods such as infrastructure and
social services (e.g., education and health). This project will focus
on the Bureau of Internal Revenue within the Department of Finance to
increase the efficiency and sustainability of revenue collection
through a redesign and computerization of business processes, thereby
helping to relieve some pressure on the Government of the Republic of
the Philippines' (``GRP's'') fiscal position. This project will narrow
the gap between potential and actual collections by reducing the
discretion of individual revenue (i.e., tax and customs) collection
officers, and help improve the predictability and impartiality with
which revenue laws and regulations are enforced. Some of these
activities are extensions of the Philippines' threshold program
activities that concluded in May 2009. The project is expected to reach
the entire Philippine population and has an economic rate of return of
40 percent.
Kalahi-CIDSS Community Development Project ($120.0 million)
The Kalahi-CIDSS Project will improve welfare in rural areas by
targeting communities where poverty incidence exceeds the national
average for small-scale, community-driven development projects. The
project does this through the direct provision of infrastructure and
services associated with community-selected and managed sub-projects,
strengthened community participation in development and governance
activities at the village and municipal level, and improved
responsiveness of local government to community needs. The project will
build on and support the application of the participatory planning,
implementation, and evaluation methodology developed by GRP's
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) in collaboration
with the World Bank.
Grants for the community sub-projects are provided directly to the
local communities, which are responsible for sub-project selection, the
procurement of goods and services for their sub-project, and, in most
cases, the operations and maintenance of the physical assets. DSWD will
implement the project, overseen by a National Steering Committee that
includes representatives from government departments and NGOs, and in
collaboration with local governments.
Typical sub-projects will include small-scale transportation
infrastructure such as village access roads and bridges, school
buildings, health clinics, drinking water systems, pre-and post-harvest
facilities, and other economic assets. The project is expected to
benefit over five million beneficiaries over the next 20 years and has
an estimated economic rate of return of 13 percent.
Secondary National Roads Development Project ($214.4 million)
The Secondary National Roads Development Project is designed to
reduce transportation costs through the rehabilitation of an existing
222 kilometer road segment. By bringing about savings in vehicle
operating cost and time for both passengers and goods, and by reducing
road maintenance costs, the investment will facilitate increased
commerce in and between the provinces of Samar and Eastern Samar,
[[Page 61198]]
and ultimately contribute to the Compact's objective of increasing
incomes.
This project will incorporate enhanced safety measures in the final
road designs, including: (i) Paved shoulders intended to improve
conditions for vehicles and provide space for pedestrians; (ii)
construction of sidewalks and curbs where pedestrian activity is
higher, such as near schools and other public facilities; (iii)
improved gateway treatments to indicate where lower speeds are
required, typically in more developed communities and urban areas; and
(iv) increased use of road narrowing, median islands, and traffic humps
to slow traffic speeds. The project is expected to reach 290,000
beneficiaries and has an economic rate of return of 14 percent.
Administration
The Compact also includes program management and oversight costs
estimated at $36.91 million over a five-year time frame, including the
costs of administration, management, auditing, and fiscal and
procurement agent services. In addition, the cost of monitoring and
evaluation of the Compact is budgeted at approximately $8.26 million.
Millennium Challenge Compact
Between the United States of America Acting Through the Millennium
Challenge Corporation and the Republic of the Philippines
Table of Contents
Article 1. Goal and Objectives
Section 1.1 Compact Goal
Section 1.2 Program Objective
Section 1.3 Project Objectives
Article 2. Funding and Resources
Section 2.1 Program Funding
Section 2.2 Compact Implementation Funding
Section 2.3 MCC Funding
Section 2.4 Disbursement
Section 2.5 Interest
Section 2.6 Government Resources; Budget
Section 2.7 Limitations of the Use of MCC Funding
Section 2.8 Taxes and Contributions
Article 3. Implementation
Section 3.1 Program Implementation Agreement
Section 3.2 Government Responsibilities
Section 3.3 Policy Performance
Section 3.4 Government Assurances
Section 3.5 Implementation Letters
Section 3.6 Procurement
Section 3.7 Records; Accounting; Covered Providers; Access
Section 3.8 Audits; Reviews
Article 4. Communications
Section 4.1 Communications
Section 4.2 Representatives
Article 5. Termination; Suspension; Refunds
Section 5.1 Termination; Suspension
Section 5.2 Refunds; Violation
Section 5.3 Survival
Article 6. Compact Annexes; Amendments; Governing Law
Section 6.1 Annexes
Section 6.2 Amendments
Section 6.3 Inconsistencies
Section 6.4 Governing Law
Section 6.5 Additional Instruments
Section 6.6 References to MCC Web site
Section 6.7 References to Laws, Regulations, Policies, and
Guidelines
Section 6.8 MCC Status
Section 6.9 Counterparts; Electronic Delivery
Article 7. Entry Into Force
Section 7.1 Conditions Precedent to Entry Into Force
Section 7.2 Date of Entry Into Force
Section 7.3 Compact Term
Section 7.4 Provisional Application
Article 8. Additional Government Covenants
Section 8.1 Project Covenants
Annex I: Program Description
Annex II: Multi-Year Financial Plan Summary
Annex III: Description of the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Annex IV: Conditions to Disbursement of Compact Implementation
Funding
Annex V: Definitions
Millennium Challenge Compact
Preamble
This Millennium Challenge Compact (this ``Compact'') is between the
United States of America, acting through the Millennium Challenge
Corporation, a United States government corporation (``MCC''), and the
Republic of the Philippines (``the Philippines''), acting through its
government (the ``Government''), represented by its Department of
Finance.
MCC and the Government are individually referred to in this Compact
as a ``Party'' and together, as the ``Parties.'' Capitalized terms used
in this Compact will have the meanings specified in Annex V hereto.
Recalling that the Government consulted with the private sector and
civil society of the Philippines to determine the priorities for the
use of Millennium Challenge Account assistance and developed and
submitted to MCC a proposal for such assistance to achieve lasting
economic growth and poverty reduction; and
Recognizing that MCC wishes to help the Philippines implement a
program to achieve the goal and objectives described herein (the
``Program'').
The Parties agree as follows:
Article 1. Goal and Objectives
Section 1.1 Compact Goal
The goal of this Compact is to reduce poverty through economic
growth in the Philippines (the ``Compact Goal'').
Section 1.2 Program Objective
The objective of the Program is to: (a) Increase the incomes of
Filipinos through the benefits of community-driven sub-projects; (b)
obtain time savings and lower transportation costs for road users in
Program areas; and (c) increase investment and government expenditure
due to an increase in tax revenue and a reduction in corruption (as
further described in Annex I, the ``Program Objective'').
Section 1.3 Project Objectives
The objectives of the Projects (as further described in Annex I)
(each a ``Project Objective'' and collectively, the ``Project
Objectives'') are as follows:
(a) The objectives of the KALAHI-CIDSS Project (as defined in Annex
I) are to: (i) Improve the responsiveness of local governments to
community needs; (ii) encourage communities to engage in development
activities; and (iii) deliver benefits to barangay residents through
individual sub-projects.
(b) The objectives of the Secondary National Roads Development
Project (as defined in Annex I) are to: (i) save time; and (ii) lower
vehicle operating costs for those Filipinos living near the roads.
(c) The objectives of the Revenue Administration Reform Project (as
defined in Annex I) are to: (i) increase tax revenues over time; and
(ii) support the Department of Finance's initiatives to detect and
deter corruption within its revenue agencies.
Article 2. Funding and Resources
Section 2.1 Program Funding
Upon entry into force of this Compact, MCC will grant to the
Government, under the terms of this Compact, an amount not to exceed
Four Hundred Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand United States
Dollars (U.S. $408,850,000) to support the Program (``Program
Funding''). The allocation of Program Funding is generally described in
Annex II to this Compact.
Section 2.2 Compact Implementation Funding
(a) Upon signature of this Compact, MCC hereby grants to the
Government, under the terms of this Compact, in addition to the Program
Funding described in Section 2.1, an amount not to exceed Twenty-Five
Million Sixty Thousand United States Dollars (U.S. $25,060,000)
(``Compact Implementation Funding'') under Section 609(g) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended (the ``MCA Act''), for use
by the Government as agreed by the Parties, which may include use for
the following purposes:
[[Page 61199]]
(i) Project management activities for the KALAHI-CIDSS Project;
(ii) Procurement and establishment of a project management company
for the Secondary National Roads Development Project; and
(iii) Technical assistance for advisory services for the Revenue
Administration Reform Project.
The allocation of Compact Implementation Funding is generally
described in Annex II to this Compact.
(b) In accordance with Section 7.4 of this Compact, this Section
2.2 and other provisions of this Compact necessary to make use of
Compact Implementation Funding for the purposes set forth herein, will
be effective, for purposes of Compact Implementation Funding only, as
of the date this Compact is signed by MCC and the Government.
(c) Each Disbursement of Compact Implementation Funding is subject
to satisfaction of the conditions to such Disbursement as set forth in
Annex IV.
(d) If, after the first anniversary of this Compact entering into
force, MCC determines that the full amount of Compact Implementation
Funding under Section 2.2(a) of this Compact exceeds the amount which
reasonably can be utilized for the purposes and uses set forth in
Section 2.2(a) of this Compact, MCC, by written notice to the
Government, may withdraw the excess amount, thereby reducing the amount
of the Compact Implementation Funding as set forth in Section 2.2(a)
(such excess, the ``Excess CIF Amount''). In such event, the amount of
Compact Implementation Funding granted to the Government under Section
2.2(a) will be reduced by the Excess CIF Amount, and MCC will have no
further obligations with respect to such Excess CIF Amount.
(e) MCC, at its option by written notice to the Government, may
elect to grant to the Government an amount equal to all or a portion of
such Excess CIF Amount as an increase in the Program Funding, and such
additional Program Funding will be subject to the terms and conditions
of this Compact and any relevant supplemental agreement applicable to
Program Funding.
Section 2.3 MCC Funding
Program Funding and Compact Implementation Funding are collectively
referred to in this Compact as ``MCC Funding.''
Section 2.4 Disbursement
In accordance with this Compact and the Program Implementation
Agreement, MCC will disburse MCC Funding for expenditures incurred in
furtherance of the Program (each instance, a ``Disbursement''). Subject
to the satisfaction of all applicable conditions, the proceeds of such
Disbursements will be made available to the Government, at MCC's sole
election, by (a) deposit to one or more bank accounts established by
the Government through MCA-Philippines and acceptable to MCC (each, a
``Permitted Account'') or (b) direct payment to the relevant provider
of goods, works or services for the implementation of the Program. MCC
Funding may be expended only to fund Program expenditures as provided
in this Compact and the Program Implementation Agreement.
Section 2.5 Interest
Except as otherwise agreed by MCC, the Government will transfer to
MCC any interest or other earnings that accrue on MCC Funding (whether
by directing such payments to a bank account outside the Philippines
that MCC may from time to time indicate or as otherwise directed by
MCC).
Section 2.6 Government Resources; Budget
(a) The Government will provide all funds and other resources, and
will take all actions, that are necessary to carry out the Government's
responsibilities and obligations under this Compact.
(b) The Government will provide suitable and adequate office space
for MCA-Philippines, the Fiscal Agent, the Procurement Agent, and the
MCC resident country mission.
(c) The Government will ensure that all MCC Funding it receives or
is projected to receive in each of its fiscal years is fully accounted
for in its annual budget on a multi-year basis.
(d) The Government will not reduce the normal and expected
resources that it would otherwise receive or budget from sources other
than MCC for the activities contemplated under this Compact and the
Program.
(e) Unless the Government discloses otherwise to MCC in writing,
MCC Funding will be in addition to the resources that the Government
would otherwise receive or budget for the activities contemplated under
this Compact and the Program.
(f) Without limitation of its obligations under Section 2.6(a)
above, the Government shall: (i) Contribute funding to MCA-Philippines
as described in Section 16 of the Establishment Decree and in
compliance with Section 2.13 of the Program Implementation Agreement;
and (ii) fund all costs in excess of those budgeted for the Program, as
set forth in Annex II (as such may be modified in accordance with the
terms thereof), in order to ensure the full and complete implementation
of the Program.
Section 2.7 Limitations on the Use of MCC Funding
The Government will ensure that MCC Funding (or any refunds or
reimbursements of MCC Funding paid by the Government in accordance with
this Compact that MCC permits to be used in connection with the
Program) will not be used for any purpose that would violate United
States law or policy, as specified in this Compact or as further
notified to the Government in writing or by posting from time to time
on the MCC Web site at www.mcc.gov (the ``MCC Web site''), including,
but not limited to, the following purposes:
(a) For assistance to, or training of, the military, police,
militia, national guard or other quasi-military organization or unit;
(b) For any activity that is likely to cause a substantial loss of
United States jobs or a substantial displacement of United States
production;
(c) To undertake, fund or otherwise support any activity that is
likely to cause a significant environmental, health, or safety hazard,
as further described in MCC's environmental and social guidelines
posted from time to time on the MCC Web site or otherwise made
available to the Government by MCC (the ``MCC Environmental
Guidelines''); or
(d) To pay for the performance of abortions as a method of family
planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions, to
pay for the performance of involuntary sterilizations as a method of
family planning or to coerce or provide any financial incentive to any
person to undergo sterilizations or to pay for any biomedical research
which relates, in whole or in part, to methods of, or the performance
of, abortions or involuntary sterilization as a means of family
planning.
Section 2.8 Taxes and Contributions
The Government will ensure that no MCC Funding will be used for the
payment of any existing or future taxes, customs duties, social
security and other employment-related contributions, or other similar
charges of the Government or any other governmental entity (national or
sub-national, including of provinces, cities, municipalities,
barangays, and other local governmental entities) in the Philippines
(``Taxes and Contributions''), in accordance with
[[Page 61200]]
Section 2.4 of the Program Implementation Agreement.
Article 3. Implementation
Section 3.1 Program Implementation Agreement
Prior to entry into force of this Compact, the Government and MCC
will enter into an agreement relating to, among other matters,
implementation arrangements, fiscal accountability, and the
disbursement and use of MCC Funding (the ``Program Implementation
Agreement'' or ``PIA''). The Government will implement the Program in
accordance with the Compact and the PIA.
Section 3.2 Government Responsibilities
(a) The Government has principal responsibility for overseeing and
managing the implementation of the Program.
(b) The Government hereby designates MCA-Philippines, an entity
established through the issuance of Executive Order No. 849 of the
Government (as amended, the ``Establishment Decree''), as the
accountable entity to implement the Program and to exercise and perform
the Government's rights and responsibilities with respect to the
oversight, management, and implementation of the Program, including,
without limitation, managing the implementation of Projects and their
Activities, allocating resources, and managing procurements. Such
entity will be referred to herein as Millennium Challenge Account-
Philippines (``MCA-Philippines''), and has the authority to bind the
Government with regard to all Program Activities. The Establishment
Decree will remain in form and substance satisfactory to MCC. For the
avoidance of doubt, the designation of MCA-Philippines as set forth in
this Section 3.2(b) will not relieve the Government of any of its
obligations or responsibilities as set forth hereunder, under any
related agreement (including, upon execution thereof, the PIA), or
under the Program Guidelines, for which the Government remains fully
responsible. MCC hereby acknowledges and consents to the designation in
this Section 3.2(b).
(c) The Government will ensure that no law or regulation in the
Philippines now or hereinafter in effect makes or will make unlawful or
otherwise prevent or hinder the performance of any of the Government's
obligations under this Compact, the PIA, or any other related agreement
or any transaction contemplated hereby or thereby.
(d) The Government will ensure that any assets or services funded
in whole or in part (directly or indirectly) by MCC Funding are used
solely in furtherance of this Compact and the Program unless otherwise
agreed by MCC in writing.
(e) The Government will take all necessary or appropriate steps to
achieve the Program Objective and the Project Objectives during the
Compact Term.
(f) The Government will fully comply with the Program Guidelines,
as applicable, in its implementation of the Program.
Section 3.3 Policy Performance
In addition to undertaking the specific policy, legal, and
regulatory reform commitments identified in Annex I (if any), the
Government will seek to maintain and to improve its level of
performance under the policy criteria identified in Section 607 of the
MCA Act, and the selection criteria and methodology used by MCC.
Section 3.4 Government Assurances
The Government assures MCC that, as of the date this Compact is
signed by the Government, the information provided to MCC by or on
behalf of the Government in the course of reaching agreement with MCC
on this Compact is true, correct and complete in all material respects.
Section 3.5 Implementation Letters
From time to time, MCC may provide guidance to the Government in
writing on any matters relating to this Compact, MCC Funding, or
implementation of the Program (each, an ``Implementation Letter''). The
Government will apply such guidance in implementing the Program.
Without limiting the foregoing, either Party may, through its Principal
Representative or any Additional Representative, as the case may be,
initiate discussions that may result in a jointly agreed-upon
Implementation Letter to confirm and record their mutual understanding
on aspects related to the implementation of this Compact, the PIA, or
other related agreements.
Section 3.6 Procurement
The Government will ensure that the procurement of all goods,
works, and services by the Government, or any applicable provider
providing goods, works, and services, to implement the Program will be
consistent with the program procurement guidelines posted from time to
time on the MCC Web site (the ``MCC Program Procurement Guidelines'').
The MCC Program Procurement Guidelines include, among others, the
following requirements:
(a) Open, fair, and competitive procedures must be used in a
transparent manner to solicit, award and administer contracts and to
procure goods, works, and services;
(b) Solicitations for goods, works, and services must be based upon
a clear and accurate description of the goods, works, and services to
be acquired;
(c) Contracts must be awarded only to qualified contractors that
have the capability and willingness to perform the contracts in
accordance with their terms on a cost effective and timely basis;
(d) No more than a commercially reasonable price, as determined,
for example, by a comparison of price quotations and market prices,
will be paid to procure goods, works, and services; and
(e) Such procurement of goods, works, and services by the
Government, or any applicable provider providing goods, works, and
services, to implement the Program will not be subject to any domestic
preference, local content, or local labor requirements.
Section 3.7 Records; Accounting; Covered Providers; Access
(a) Government Books and Records. The Government will maintain, and
will use its best efforts to ensure that all Covered Providers
maintain, accounting books, records, documents, and other evidence
relating to the Program adequate to show, to MCC's satisfaction, the
use of all MCC Funding (``Compact Records''). In addition, the
Government will furnish or cause to be furnished to MCC, upon its
request, all such Compact Records.
(b) Accounting. The Government will maintain, and will use its best
efforts to ensure that all Covered Providers maintain, Compact Records
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles prevailing
in the United States, or at the Government's option and with MCC's
prior written approval, other accounting principles, such as those (i)
prescribed by the International Accounting Standards Board, or (ii)
then prevailing in the Philippines. Compact Records must be maintained
for at least five (5) years after the end of the Compact Term or for
such longer period, if any, required to resolve any litigation, claims
or audit findings or any statutory requirements.
(c) Providers and Covered Providers. Unless the Parties agree
otherwise in writing, a ``Provider'' is (i) any entity of the
Government that receives or uses MCC Funding or any other Program Asset
in carrying out activities in
[[Page 61201]]
furtherance of this Compact, or (ii) any third party that receives at
least Fifty Thousand United Stated Dollars (US$50,000) in the aggregate
of MCC Funding (other than as salary or compensation as an employee of
an entity of the Government) during the Compact Term. A ``Covered
Provider'' is (1) a non-United States Provider that receives (other
than pursuant to a direct contract or agreement with MCC) Three Hundred
Thousand United States Dollars (US$300,000) or more of MCC Funding in
any Government fiscal year or any other non-United States person or
entity that receives, directly or indirectly, Three Hundred Thousand
United States Dollars (US$300,000) or more of MCC Funding from any
Provider in such fiscal year, or (2) any United States Provider that
receives (other than pursuant to a direct contract or agreement with
MCC) Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars (US$500,000) or more
of MCC Funding in any Government fiscal year or any other United States
person or entity that receives, directly or indirectly, Five Hundred
Thousand United States Dollars (US$500,000) or more of MCC Funding from
any Provider in such fiscal year.
(d) Access. Upon MCC's request, the Government, at all reasonable
times, will permit, or cause to be permitted, authorized
representatives of MCC, an authorized Inspector General, the United
States Government Accountability Office, any auditor responsible for an
audit contemplated herein or otherwise conducted in furtherance of this
Compact, and any agents or representatives engaged by MCC or the
Government to conduct any assessment, review, or evaluation of the
Program, the opportunity to audit, review, evaluate, or inspect
facilities and activities funded in whole or in part by MCC Funding.
Section 3.8 Audits; Reviews
(a) Government Audits. Except as the Parties may otherwise agree in
writing, the Government will, on at least a semi-annual basis, conduct,
or cause to be conducted, financial audits of all Disbursements of MCC
Funding covering the period from signing of this Compact until the
earlier of the following December 31 or June 30 and covering each six-
month period thereafter ending December 31 and June 30, through the end
of the Compact Term. In addition, upon MCC's request, the Government
will ensure that such audits are conducted by an independent auditor
approved by MCC and named on the list of local auditors approved by the
Inspector General of MCC (the ``Inspector General'') or a United
States-based certified public accounting firm selected in accordance
with the ``Guidelines for Financial Audits Contracted by MCA'' (the
``Audit Guidelines'') issued and revised from time to time by the
Inspector General, which are posted on the MCC Web site. Audits will be
performed in accordance with the Audit Guidelines and be subject to
quality assurance oversight by the Inspector General. Each audit must
be completed and the audit report delivered to MCC no later than ninety
(90) days after the first period to be audited and no later than ninety
(90) days after each June 30 and December 31 thereafter, or such other
period as the Parties may otherwise agree in writing.
(b) Audits of United States Entities. The Government will ensure
that agreements between the Government or any Provider, on the one
hand, and a United States nonprofit organization, on the other hand,
that are financed with MCC Funding state that the United States
nonprofit organization is subject to the applicable audit requirements
contained in OMB Circular A-133, ``Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non Profit Organizations,'' issued by the United States Government
Office of Management and Budget. The Government will ensure that
agreements between the Government or any Provider, on the one hand, and
a United States for-profit Covered Provider, on the other hand, that
are financed with MCC Funding state that the United States for-profit
organization is subject to audit by the applicable United States
Government agency, unless the Government and MCC agree otherwise in
writing.
(c) Corrective Actions. The Government will (i) use its best
efforts to ensure that Covered Providers take, where necessary,
appropriate and timely corrective actions in response to audits, (ii)
consider whether the results of a Covered Provider's audit necessitates
adjustment of the Government's records, and (iii) require each such
Covered Provider to permit independent auditors to have access to its
records and financial statements as necessary.
(d) Audit by MCC. MCC will have the right to arrange for audits of
the Government's use of MCC Funding.
(e) Cost of Audits, Reviews or Evaluations. MCC Funding may be used
to fund the costs of any audits, reviews, or evaluations required under
this Compact.
Article 4. Communications
Section 4.1 Communications
Any document or communication required or submitted by either Party
to the other under this Compact must be in writing and, except as
otherwise agreed with MCC, in English. For this purpose, the address of
each Party is set forth below. The Government will provide to MCC any
information that is missing from below.
To MCC:
Millennium Challenge Corporation, Attention: Vice President,
Compact Operations, (in each case, with a copy to the Vice President
and General Counsel), 875 Fifteenth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005,
United States of America, Facsimile: (202) 521-3700, Telephone: (202)
521-3600, e-mail: VPOperations@mcc.gov (Vice President, Compact
Operations), VPGeneralCounsel@mcc.gov (Vice President and General
Counsel).
To the Government:
Attention: Secretary of Finance, (in each case, with a copy to the
Undersecretary for International Finance Group), Address: 6/F, DOF
Building, Department of Finance, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Complex,
Roxas Boulevard, Manila 1004 Philippines, Facsimile: (632) 523-9495/
(632) 523-9216, Telephone: (632) 523-9215/(632) 523-9911, e-mail:
mcccompact@dof.gov.ph.
To MCA-Philippines:
Attention: Managing Director, Address: Room Nos. 602-604, 6/F EDPC
Building, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Complex, Roxas Boulevard, Manila
1004 Philippines, Contact details on the facsimile number, telephone
number, and e-mail address will be provided in writing to MCC by MCA-
Philippines
Section 4.2 Representatives
For all purposes of this Compact, the Government will be
represented by the individual holding the position of, or acting as,
the Secretary of Finance and MCC will be represented by the individual
holding the position of, or acting as, Vice President, Compact
Operations (each of the foregoing, a ``Principal Representative'').
Each Party, by written notice to the other Party, may designate one or
more additional representatives (each, an ``Additional
Representative'') for all purposes other than signing amendments to
this Compact. The Government hereby irrevocably designates the Managing
Director of MCA-Philippines as an Additional Representative. A Party
may change its Principal Representative to a new representative that
holds a position
[[Page 61202]]
of equal or higher rank upon written notice to the other Party.
Article 5. Termination; Suspension; Refunds
Section 5.1 Termination; Suspension
(a) Either Party may terminate this Compact without cause in whole
by giving the other Party thirty (30) days written notice. MCC may also
terminate this Compact without cause in part by giving the Government
thirty (30) days written notice.
(b) MCC may, immediately, upon written notice to the Government,
suspend or terminate this Compact or MCC Funding, in whole or in part,
and any obligation related thereto, if MCC determines that any
circumstance identified by MCC in writing to the Government as a basis
for suspension or termination has occurred, which circumstances
include, but are not limited, to the following:
(i) The Government fails to comply with its obligations under this
Compact, the PIA, or any other agreement or arrangement entered into by
the Government in connection with this Compact or the Program;
(ii) An event or series of events has occurred that MCC determines
makes it probable that the Program Objective or any of the Project
Objectives will not be achieved during the Compact Term or that the
Government will not be able to perform its obligations under this
Compact;
(iii) A use of MCC Funding or continued implementation of this
Compact or the Program violates applicable law or United States
Government policy, whether now or hereafter in effect;
(iv) The Government or any other person or entity receiving MCC
Funding or using assets acquired in whole or in part with MCC Funding
is engaged in activities that are contrary to the national security
interests of the United States;
(v) An act has been committed or an omission or an event has
occurred that would render the Philippines ineligible to receive United
States economic assistance under Part I of the Foreign Assistance Act
of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), by reason of the
application of any provision of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 or
any other provision of law;
(vi) The Philippines is classified as a Tier 3 country in the
United States Department of State's annual Trafficking in Persons
Report;
(vii) The Government has engaged in a pattern of actions
inconsistent with the criteria used to determine the eligibility of the
Philippines for assistance under the MCA Act; or
(viii) The Government or another person or entity receiving MCC
Funding or using assets acquired in whole or in part with MCC Funding
is found to have been convicted of a narcotics offense or to have been
engaged in drug trafficking.
(c) All Disbursements will cease upon expiration, suspension, or
termination of this Compact; provided, however, MCC may permit MCC
Funding to be used, in compliance with this Compact and the PIA, to pay
for (i) expenditures for goods, works, or services that are properly
incurred under or in furtherance of the Program before expiration,
suspension, or termination of this Compact, and (ii) reasonable
expenditures (including administrative expenses) properly incurred in
connection with the winding up of the Program within one hundred twenty
(120) days after the expiration, suspension, or termination of this
Compact, so long as, with respect to (i) and (ii) herein, the request
for such expenditures is submitted within ninety (90) days after such
expiration, suspension, or termination.
(d) Subject to Section 5.1(c), upon the expiration, suspension, or
termination of this Compact, (i) any amounts of MCC Funding not
disbursed by MCC in accordance with the Compact and the PIA will be
automatically released from any obligation in connection with this
Compact, and (ii) any amounts of MCC Funding disbursed to the Permitted
Account by MCC but not expended before the expiration, suspension or
termination of this Compact, plus accrued interest thereon will be
returned to MCC within thirty (30) days after the Government receives
MCC's request for such return; provided, however, that if this Compact
is suspended or terminated in part, MCC may request a refund for only
the amount of MCC Funding allocated to the suspended or terminated
portion. For the avoidance of doubt, interest will accrue from the date
of the violation and will be calculated at the 10-year U.S. Treasury
Note rate prevailing as of the close of business in Washington, DC as
of the date of MCC's request for payment.
(e) MCC may reinstate any suspended or terminated MCC Funding under
this Compact if MCC determines that the Government or other relevant
person or entity has committed to correct each condition for which MCC
Funding was suspended or terminated.
Section 5.2 Refunds; Violation
(a) If any MCC Funding, any interest or earnings thereon, or any
asset acquired in whole or in part with MCC Funding is used for any
purpose in violation of the terms of this Compact or the PIA,
including, but not limited to, any violation of the Program Guidelines,
then MCC may require the Government to repay to MCC in United States
Dollars the value of the misused MCC Funding, interest, earnings, or
asset, plus interest within thirty (30) days after the Government's
receipt of MCC's request for repayment. For the avoidance of doubt,
interest will accrue from the date of the violation and will be
calculated at the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate prevailing as of the
close of business in Washington, DC as of the date of MCC's request for
payment. The Government will not use MCC Funding, proceeds thereof or
Program Assets to make such payment.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Compact or any
other agreement to the contrary, MCC's right under this Section 5.2 for
a refund will continue during the Compact Term and for a period of (i)
five (5) years thereafter, or (ii) one (1) year after MCC receives
actual knowledge of such violation, whichever is later.
Section 5.3 Survival
The Government's responsibilities under Sections 2.4, 2.6, 2.7,
2.8, 3.7, 3.8, 5.1(c), 5.1(d), 5.2, 5.3, 6.2, and 6.4 of this Compact
will survive the expiration, suspension, or termination of this
Compact.
Article 6. Compact Annexes; Amendments; Governing Law
Section 6.1 Annexes
Each annex to this Compact constitutes an integral part hereof, and
references to ``Annex'' mean an annex to this Compact unless otherwise
expressly stated.
Section 6.2 Amendments
(a) The Parties may amend this Compact only by a written agreement
signed by the Principal Representatives.
(b) Without amending this Compact, the Government hereby
acknowledges and agrees that the Parties may, through the Principal
Representative or any Additional Representative, in writing agree to
modify any Annex to this Compact to (i) suspend, terminate (including
the termination of a Project Objective), or modify any project
described in Annex I (each, a ``Project'' and collectively, the
``Projects'') or to create a new project, (ii) change the allocations
of funds from what is set forth in Annex II as of the date hereof, or
(iii) add, delete, or waive any condition precedent described in Annex
[[Page 61203]]
IV, provided that any such modification, (1) is consistent in all
material respects with the Program Objective, (2) does not cause the
amount of Program Funding to exceed the aggregate amount specified in
Section 2.1 of this Compact (as may be modified by operation of Section
2.2(e) of this Compact), (3) does not cause the amount of Compact
Implementation Funding to exceed the aggregate amount specified in
Section 2.2(a) of this Compact, (4) does not cause the Government's
responsibilities or contribution of resources to be less than specified
in this Compact, (5) does not extend the Compact Term, and (6) in the
case of a modification to change allocations of funds among Projects or
the creation of a new Project, does not materially adversely affect any
components under the Program Administration and Audits or Monitoring
and Evaluation line items in Annex II.
(c) Any modification of any Annex to this Compact signed in
accordance with Section 6.2(b), or any modification of any other
provision of this Compact pursuant to Section 6.2(a), will be binding
on the Government without the need for further action by the
Government, any further Congressional action, or satisfaction of any
additional legal requirements of the Philippines.
Section 6.3 Inconsistencies
In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between:
(a) Any Annex to this Compact and any of Article 1.1 and Articles 2
through 8, such Article 1.1 and Articles 2 through 8, as applicable,
will prevail; or
(b) This Compact and any other agreement between the Parties
regarding the Program, this Compact will prevail.
Section 6.4 Governing Law
This Compact is an international agreement and as such will be
governed by the principles of international law.
Section 6.5 Additional Instruments
Any reference to activities, obligations, or rights undertaken or
existing under or in furtherance of this Compact or similar language
will include activities, obligations, and rights undertaken by or
existing under or in furtherance of any agreement, document, or
instrument related to this Compact and the Program.
Section 6.6 References to MCC Web site
Any reference in this Compact, the PIA, or any other agreement
entered into in connection with this Compact, to a document or
information available on, or notified by posting on, the MCC Web site
will be deemed a reference to such document or information as updated
or substituted on the MCC Web site from time to time.
Section 6.7 References to Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Guidelines
Each reference in this Compact, the PIA, or any other agreement
entered into in connection with this Compact, to a law, regulation,
policy, guideline, or similar document (including, but not limited to,
the Program Guidelines) will be construed as a reference to such law,
regulation, policy, guideline, or similar document as it may, from time
to time, be amended, revised, replaced, or extended and will include
any law, regulation, policy, guideline, or similar document issued
under or otherwise applicable or related to such law, regulation,
policy, guideline, or similar document.
Section 6.8 MCC Status
MCC is a United States government corporation acting on behalf of
the United States government in the implementation of this Compact. MCC
and the United States government have no liability under this Compact,
the Program Implementation Agreement, or any related agreement, are
immune from any action or proceeding arising under or relating to any
of the foregoing documents, and the Government hereby waives and
releases all claims related to any such liability. In matters arising
under or relating to this Compact, the Program Implementation
Agreement, or any related agreement, neither MCC nor the United States
government will be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the
Philippines or of any other jurisdiction or of any other body.
Section 6.9 Counterparts; Electronic Delivery
(a) Counterparts. Signatures to this Compact, the Program
Implementation Agreement, and any amendments to these agreements will
be signed on the same page, except in the case of amendment via
exchange of letters or diplomatic notes. Any other documents arising
out of this Compact may be signed in one or more counterparts. Such
counterparts when delivered and taken together will constitute a single
document.
(b) Electronic Delivery. A signature to this Compact, the Program
Implementation Agreement, and any amendments to such agreements, will
be an original signature. With respect to any other documents arising
out of this Compact, a signature delivered by facsimile or electronic
mail in accordance with Section 4.1 of this Compact will be deemed an
original signature and will be binding on the Party delivering such
signature, and the Parties hereby waive any objection to such signature
or to the validity of the underlying document, certificate, notice,
instrument, or agreement on the basis of the signature's legal effect,
validity or enforceability solely because it is in facsimile or
electronic form.
Article 7. Entry Into Force
Section 7.1 Conditions Precedent to Entry Into Force
Before this Compact enters into force:
(a) The PIA must have been signed by the parties thereto;
(b) The Government must have delivered to MCC:
(i) A legal opinion from the Secretary of Justice of the
Philippines (or such other legal representative of the Government
acceptable to MCC), in form and substance satisfactory to MCC; and
(ii) Complete, certified copies of all decrees, legislation,
regulations, or other governmental documents relating to the
Government's domestic requirements for this Compact to enter into
force, which MCC may post on the MCC Web site or otherwise make
publicly available; and
(c) MCC must determine that, after signature of this Compact, the
Government has not engaged in a pattern of actions inconsistent with
the eligibility criteria for MCC Funding.
Section 7.2 Date of Entry Into Force
This Compact will enter into force on the date of the last letter
in an exchange of letters between the Principal Representatives
confirming that each Party has completed its domestic requirements for
entry into force of this Compact and that the conditions precedent to
entry into force of Section 7.1 have been met. The letter from the
Government will contain an affirmation of the Government's commitment
to its obligations hereunder and under the Program Implementation
Agreement.
Section 7.3 Compact Term
This Compact will remain in force for five (5) years after its
entry into force, unless terminated earlier under Section 5.1 (the
``Compact Term'').
Section 7.4 Provisional Application
Upon signature of this Compact and until this Compact has entered
into force in accordance with Section 7.2, the Parties will
provisionally apply the terms of this Compact and the PIA; provided
that, no Program Funding will be made available or disbursed before
this Compact enters into force.
[[Page 61204]]
Article 8. Additional Government Covenants
Section 8.1 Project Covenants
(a) KALAHI-CIDSS Project. With regard to the KALAHI-CIDSS Project,
the Government agrees that:
(i) Throughout the Compact Term, the Department of Social Welfare
and Development (``DSWD'') will use the classification system approved
by MCC to assess and classify every proposed sub-project, and provide
the engineering design and oversight support appropriate to the
classification of such sub-project; and
(ii) For those municipalities that are randomly selected to be
included in the control group, DSWD will not (1) provide KALAHI-CIDSS
funding, or (2) provide other programs of DSWD on a systematic basis,
in both cases for the duration of the Compact Term.
(b) Revenue Administration Reform Project. With regard to the
Revenue Administration Reform Project, the Government agrees to
implement the following prior to the initial disbursement of any
Program Funding for the Revenue Administration Reform Project:
(i) To the full extent allowed by existing law, procedures shall be
put in place wherein decisions of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
and the Commissioner of Customs in all graft-related cases shall be
transmitted promptly to the Secretary of Finance, the head of the
Revenue Integrity Protection Service created under Executive Order No.
259, s. 2003, who shall then immediately forward them to the Revenue
Integrity Protection Service to review the said cases and determine
their compliance with existing laws and procedures. If warranted by the
evidence on record and any additional evidence it gathers, the Revenue
Integrity Protection Service shall file the necessary complaint(s) with
the office of the ombudsman or other appropriate administrative body or
agency of competent jurisdiction.
(ii) The Revenue Integrity Protection Service shall actively
exercise its powers pursuant to Executive Order No. 259, to ensure the
proactive pursuit of graft-related programs, policies and procedures by
the internal inspection units of the revenue agencies under the
Department of Finance. These actions shall include, but may not be
limited to, the conduct of operational audits of said units.
(iii) The Bureau of Internal Revenue and the Bureau of Customs
internal audit units will be reorganized directly under the Office of
the Commissioner.
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned, duly authorized by their
respective governments, have signed this Compact.
Done at New York, NY, this 23rd day of September 2010, in the
English language only.
For Millennium Challenge Corporation, on behalf of the United
States of America.
Daniel W. Yohannes,
Chief Executive Officer.
For the Republic of the Philippines.
Cesar V. Purisima,
Secretary of Finance.
Annex I Program Description
This Annex I describes the Program that MCC Funding will support
in the Philippines during the Compact Term.
A. Program Overview
1. Background and Consultative Process
The Philippines was declared eligible for MCC assistance in
March 2008. With a population of approximately 90 million
inhabitants, the 7,107 islands of the Philippines cover a combined
area of 115,830 square miles. Despite unprecedented growth gains
over the past decade, accompanied by moderate inflation, the
Philippines continues to face severe constraints to reducing
poverty. In an effort to prioritize its development spending, the
Government elaborated a national medium-term development plan and
several sector strategies, and undertook an analysis of constraints
to economic growth. Priorities were identified for increased social
sector spending, improvements to basic infrastructure, and
improvements to governance, and were confirmed through a number of
national, regional, and local consultations from early 2007 through
early 2009.
The Program has been designed by the Government, building upon
initiatives from numerous donors, non-governmental organizations,
and the domestic private sector to spur growth in economically
depressed or vulnerable regions and to provide a platform for
continued poverty reduction efforts. The Program will enable the
Government to increase resources available for high-priority
expenditures and target Government initiatives toward some of the
poorest regions and municipalities in the archipelago.
2. Program Objective
The Program Objective is to: (a) Increase the incomes of
Filipinos through the benefits of community-driven sub-projects; (b)
obtain time savings and lower transportation costs for road users in
Program areas; and (c) increase investment and government
expenditure due to an increase in tax revenue and a reduction in
corruption.
3. Environmental and Social Safeguards
The Program will be implemented in compliance with the MCC
Environmental Guidelines, MCC guidance on the integration of gender
in program implementation, and MCC's guidance on the implementation
of resettlement activities (or any other MCC policy comparable to
the World Bank's Operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement in
effect as of July 2007) (``OP 4.12''). The Government will also
ensure that the Projects comply with all national environmental laws
and regulations, licenses and permits, except to the extent such
compliance would be inconsistent with this Compact. The Government
will: (a) Cooperate with any ongoing environmental review, or if
necessary undertake and complete any additional environmental
reviews required by MCC or under the laws of the Philippines; (b)
implement to MCC's satisfaction environmental and social mitigation
measures identified in such environmental review; and (c) fund the
costs of environmental mitigation (including costs of resettlement)
that exceed the MCC Funding specifically allocated for such costs in
the budget for any Project. To maximize the positive social impacts
of the program, the Government will take steps to address cross-
cutting social and gender-specific issues, including, but not
limited to, combating human trafficking and HIV/AIDS, during Compact
implementation.
B. Description of the Projects
Set forth below is a description of each of the Projects that
the Government will implement, or cause to be implemented, using MCC
Funding to advance the applicable Project Objective. In addition,
specific activities that will be undertaken within each Project
(each, an ``Activity''), including sub-activities, are described.
1. KALAHI-CIDSS Project
(a) Background.
The Philippines lags significantly behind other countries in the
region with respect to government development expenditures as a
percentage of GDP and infrastructure investment and quality. The
Asian Development Bank's 2007 growth diagnostic report found that
inadequacies in infrastructure are a critical constraint to growth
and that the availability of basic infrastructure (water,
sanitation, roads, electricity) is regressive. While human capital
was not found to be a critical constraint to growth, inadequate
human capabilities are often an underlying cause of poverty.
Provision and use of education and health services were found to
vary across regions, particularly as a function of incomes.
Community driven development projects are a strategy for addressing
these constraints and providing community empowerment and poverty
reduction. In the past, they have been used to support a wide range
of community priority needs including provision of water supply and
nutrition programs for women and children; building of school, day
care and health facilities, farm to market roads, foot bridges, and
drainage systems; and support for productive enterprises such as
pre- and post-harvest facilities as well as community capacity
building.
Kapit bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (``Linking Arms Against
Poverty'')--Comprehensive Integrated Delivery of Social Services
(``KALAHI-CIDSS'') is a community driven development project
implemented by DSWD of the Philippines. Through KALAHI-CIDSS,
communities (``barangays'' or villages) are trained, together with
their local
[[Page 61205]]
governments, both at the barangay and the municipal level, to
choose, design and implement sub-projects that are intended to
address their most pressing needs. This is done through a four-year
program, which includes one year of ``social preparation'' training
for communities, barangays and municipalities, followed by 3
``cycles'' of sub-project implementation. The KALAHI-CIDSS project
to be funded by MCC (the ``KALAHI-CIDSS Project'') is an expansion
of an initial KALAHI-CIDSS project (``KC1'') that was implemented
between 2003 and 2010. KC1 was funded by a loan from the World Bank.
During KC1 implementation, the World Bank and DSWD were able to
ensure that the project incorporated lessons learned and reinforced
elements that had been shown to work well.
The KALAHI-CIDSS Project is particularly well suited to the
sociopolitical environment in the Philippines. Following
decentralization, local governments have a responsibility to provide
basic services, yet suffer from a lack of development resources.
This issue is compounded by the geographic distribution of poverty
in the Philippines. Poverty in the country is correlated with rural
isolation and distance from towns and urban centers, meaning that
the communities that have the greatest needs for basic services are
the ones that are most difficult to reach. Community-driven
development offers an alternative, needs-based approach that
provides development resources for basic services directly to the
poorest communities, specifically targeting those in far-flung
areas, while at the same time building the capacity of local
government to be responsive to these needs over time. It is because
of this contextualized approach that KC1 has already met with
considerable success.
(b) Project.
The objectives of the KALAHI-CIDSS Project are to:
Improve the responsiveness of local governments to
community needs;
Encourage communities to engage in development
activities; and
Deliver benefits to barangay residents through the
individual sub-projects.
In conjunction with DSWD, MCC will incorporate a number of
enhancements to KC1 into the KALAHI-CIDSS Project, all of which are
supported by lessons learned from KC1 and desires expressed by
KALAHI-CIDSS Project stakeholders. These refinements include, but
are not limited to: (i) Dedicated gender staff positions and gender-
focused activities, including the provision of ``gender incentive
grants'' to communities; (ii) reinforced financial controls on the
Project, including an additional set of transaction and technical
audits; (iii) dedicated staff positions to explore private-sector
involvement opportunities within municipalities included in the
KALAHI-CIDSS Project; (iv) development of a set of user-friendly
community tools to assess environmental impact and ensure the
KALAHI-CIDSS Project's environmental sustainability; (v) a
management information system to enable a much greater level of data
capture at the barangay and municipal level, including a
``geographic information system'' component; (vi) a rigorous impact
evaluation to assess the KALAHI-CIDSS Project's impact on social
capital and welfare measures using a rigorous random selection
technique that allows the measurement of attribution; and (vii)
support for a joint advisory board to oversee the impact evaluation,
composed of members from MCC, MCA-Philippines, the World Bank, DSWD,
the National Economic Development Authority, and local academics.
The KALAHI-CIDSS Project will cover municipalities that have a
poverty incidence higher than the national average and that are not
in the Mindanao island group. The KALAHI-CIDSS Project consists of
the following Activities:
(i) Capacity Building and Implementation Support Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD to provide the staff
salaries and trainings for the DSWD frontline workers, known as the
area coordinating teams. These teams are made up of a standard
staffing complement and there will be one team for each municipality
in the KALAHI-CIDSS Project. The role of the area coordinating team
is to carry out the ``Community Empowerment Activity Cycle.'' This
framework follows a progression of strategies and activities as a
gradual ``hand off'' to local government of responsibilities takes
place over the course of three cycles. During each cycle, barangays
hold a series of meetings that are facilitated by members of the
area coordinating team at which barangay residents identify and
prioritize constraints to economic activities within their
communities and then identify and prioritize solutions to these
constraints. Finally, the barangay selects one constraint and
associated solution for presentation by elected community
representatives to the ``Municipal Inter-Barangay Forum.'' At the
municipal level, two Municipal Inter-Barangay Forums are held, the
first to determine the criteria by which the community
representatives will prioritize the barangay sub-projects for
funding and the second to prioritize them according to such
criteria. At the conclusion of each of the three cycles of sub-
project implementation, there is a transition and reporting period.
The entire Community Empowerment Activity Cycle process is
facilitated by the area coordinating team, with various team members
responsible for ensuring that processes are transparent and in
accordance with the KALAHI-CIDSS Project manuals as revised by MCC.
This Activity also supports the existing grievance redress system.
(ii) Grants for Community Projects Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD, to be used by DSWD to plan
and implement community-chosen sub-projects in accordance with the
KALAHI-CIDSS Project manuals approved by MCC. Specifically, the
KALAHI-CIDSS Project provides grants for livelihood activities and
the construction, repair and improvement/upgrading of small-scale
rural infrastructure sub-projects identified by the community. The
municipalities and barangays in which sub-project activities will
occur will make cash and in-kind contributions (including partially-
paid labor and local materials) to the sub-projects equal, in each
case, to at least 30 percent of the total sub-project costs. The
grant allocated to the municipal local governments to fund sub-
project implementation is proportionate in size to the number of
barangays within that municipality. Suppliers and contractors will
be selected according to the procedures in the ``Community-Based
Procurement System.'' This procurement system was specifically
designed for implementing the KALAHI-CIDSS Project taking into
account the nature of the procurements, the local market conditions
and the local capacities. At the community level an ``Audit and
Inventory Committee'' is responsible for auditing the financial
records and reports of the community and conducting a regular
inventory of all properties acquired by the community. The
community's books and records are open at all times to all members
of the community for inspection.
Communities have the opportunity to select from a variety of
sub-projects, many which involve the selection, design, and
construction of small infrastructure sub-projects. DSWD--in
cooperation with local governments--will build the capacity of
communities through trainings and other methods and provide guidance
and oversight throughout the process. In cooperation with DSWD, MCC
will create a detailed risk profiling system for sub-projects and a
complementary risk-based management approach to oversight that may
affect the way that the grants are spent within the Grants for
Community Project Activity.
(iii) Project Management Activity.
MCC Funding will be granted to DSWD to provide salaries and
training for DSWD project management staff at the regional and
national level. These funds will also be used for the office space,
conferences, capacity building and project monitoring associated
with the project management activity. Goods to support this activity
will be procured by MCA-Philippines.
(c) Beneficiaries.
In the project catchment areas (i.e. those municipalities that
will receive support from the KALAHI-CIDSS Project), 16 to 20
percent of the households have a female head, while the young and
elderly constitute a significant fraction of the expected
beneficiaries. The Project is expected to benefit approximately 5.2
million Filipinos 20 years after the Compact enters into force. Of
these, 39 percent consume below the poverty line of US$2 (in 2005
PPP US dollars) per day (compared to 28 percent of the national
population). As for the extreme poor, 13 percent of the Project's
beneficiaries consume below US$1.25 a day (compared to 9 percent of
the national population). And as for the non-poor, only 26 percent
of this Project's beneficiaries consume above US$4 a day (as oppo