Record of Decision for the Guam and Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Military Relocation: Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Air and Missile Defense Task Force, 60438-60440 [2010-24478]
Download as PDF
60438
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 189 / Thursday, September 30, 2010 / Notices
addition, Customer Relationship
Management incorporates business rules
limiting access to privacy data in
accordance with the roles and
responsibilities assigned to them. These
rules include the enforcement of needto-know access controls. Further,
personnel in the Air Force Financial
Services Center and those who maintain
the commercial facility are required to
undergo background checks and have
proper security clearances in place for
the duration of their work with the
Customer Relationship Management
system.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
Accountability records documenting
the issue or receipt of accountable
documents are destroyed 1 year after all
entries are cleared. Records are
destroyed by erasing from electronic
storage media online and offline.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Security Number (SSN), any details,
which may assist in locating records,
and their signature.
In addition, the requester must
provide a notarized statement or an
unsworn declaration made in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the
following format:
If executed outside the United States:
‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state)
under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed
on (date). (Signature)’.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Air Force rules for access to
records, and for contesting and
appealing initial agency determinations
by the individual concerned are
published in Air Force Instruction 33–
332, Privacy Act Program, 32 CFR Part
806b, or may be obtained from the
system manager.
Director, Information Systems and
Technology, SAF/FMPSA, 1602 B–Wing
Suite 327, Andrews AFB 20762–0001.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
Individuals seeking to determine
whether information about themselves
is contained in this system should
address written inquiries to the Director,
Information Systems and Technology,
SAF/FMPSA, 1602 B–Wing Suite 327,
Andrews AFB 20762–0001.
For verification purposes, individual
should provide their full name, Social
Security Number (SSN), any detail,
which may assist in locating records,
and their signature.
In addition, the requester must
provide a notarized statement or an
unsworn declaration made in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the
following format:
If executed outside the United States:
‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state)
under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed
on (date). (Signature)’.
If executed within the United States,
its territories, possessions, or
commonwealths: ‘I declare (or certify,
verify, or state) under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on (date). (Signature)’.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking access to
information about themselves contained
in this system should address requests
to the Director, Information Systems and
Technology, SAF/FMPSA, 1602 B-Wing
Suite 327, Andrews AFB 20762–0001.
For verification purposes, individuals
should provide their full name, Social
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Sep 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
From individuals by interactive
interview.
None.
[FR Doc. 2010–24474 Filed 9–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for the Guam and
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana
Islands Military Relocation: Relocating
Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft
Carrier Berthing, and Air and Missile
Defense Task Force
Lead Agency: Department of the Navy,
DoD.
Cooperating Agency: Department of
the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision.
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) and the Department of the Army
(Army), after carefully weighing the
environmental consequences of the
proposed action, as well as considering
operational and training requirements,
strategic requirements, obligations
under treaties and other international
agreements, and cost, announce their
decision to proceed with Guam and
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI) Military Relocation.
As a result of redefining the United
States (U.S.) defense posture in the
Pacific region and the U.S. alliance with
Japan, a portion of U.S. Marine Corps
(USMC) forces currently located in
Okinawa, Japan will be relocated to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guam. This relocation of USMC forces
will meet international agreement and
treaty requirements and fulfill U.S.
national security policy requirements to
provide mutual defense, deter
aggression, and dissuade coercion in the
Western Pacific Region in response to
the evolving security environment in
the Pacific region, as identified through
the Integrated Global Presence and
Basing Strategy and the Quadrennial
Defense Review (QDR). The redefining
of the U.S. defense posture in the Pacific
also calls for greater availability of
aircraft carrier strike groups in the
Pacific to support engagement,
presence, and deterrence. Finally, in
support of the proposed military
relocation, the stationing of an Air and
Missile Defense Task Force (AMDTF) is
also being considered. A significant
number of countries have ballistic
missile capabilities which can deliver
conventional, nuclear, biological, and
chemical weapons. Other countries are
working to establish these capabilities
and missile systems. The effective strike
range of defensive ballistic missile
systems dictates that they must be
located in the proximity of the protected
assets. The need for the proposed
AMDTF is to protect the territory of
Guam, its citizens, U.S. and allied forces
on Guam from the threat of harm from
ballistic missile attacks from other
countries and enemies of the U.S.
Implementing the military relocation
analyzed in the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) will be a multi-agency,
multi-year effort undertaken by the
DoN, Army, Department of
Transportation’s Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Guam utilities,
Guam agencies, and various private
entities. Implementation includes
several components:
(1) Marine Corps: (a) Development
and construction of facilities and
infrastructure to support approximately
8,600 Marines and their 9,000
dependents being relocated from
Okinawa to Guam. (b) Development and
construction of facilities and
infrastructure to support training and
operations on Guam and Tinian (located
in the CNMI).
DoN has elected to defer selection of
a specific site for the construction and
operation of a live fire training range
complex in the Route 15 area in Guam
pending completion of the Section 106
consultation process under the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
Likewise, a selection regarding
implementation of a roadway
improvement project calling for a
realignment of Route 15 is hereby
deferred pending selection of a specific
site for the construction.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 189 / Thursday, September 30, 2010 / Notices
(2) Navy: Construction of a new deepdraft wharf with shoreside
infrastructure improvements creating
the capability in Apra Harbor, Guam to
support a transient nuclear powered
aircraft carrier.
DoN has elected to defer selection of
a specific site for the construction and
operation of a transient aircraft carrier
berth within Apra Harbor for the near
term. However, the analysis presented
in the EIS, including the marine
resources impacts analysis, provides
sufficient information to allow the DoN
to fully consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative environmental impacts of
locating a transient aircraft carrier berth
and make a programmatic decision to
locate a transient aircraft carrier berth
generally within Apra Harbor, which is
the only deep draft harbor on the island
of Guam that could support such a
berth.
(3) Army: Development of facilities
and infrastructure on Guam to support
relocating approximately 600 military
personnel and their 900 dependents to
establish and operate an Air and Missile
Defense Task Force (AMDTF).
As of the date of this Record of
Decision (ROD), the Department of
Defense (DoD) has not decided to
construct and operate an AMDTF on
Guam. The decision on whether to
assign this mission to the Army will be
made pending the results of the ongoing
regional and global Ballistic Missile
Defense architectural and capability
studies. It will also be based in part on
the EIS for this proposed action with
Guam as one site that is under
consideration for an AMDTF mission.
The EIS was prepared noting that if the
mission were assigned to Army, the
alternatives presented in the EIS
represent how Army could implement
the action on Guam. Army has selected
the preferred alternatives described in
Volume 5 of the EIS as the appropriate
manner to implement the proposed
action if and when the mission is
assigned.
(4) Utilities: Renovation and
development of additional capacity for
power, water, and wastewater systems,
both on base and off base, to support the
increased demand from the new Marine
Corps Base and associated growth in
DoD and civilian population caused by
the Relocation.
(5) Off-base Roadways: Improvements
to off base roads, bridges, and
intersections to support increased traffic
and offset significant impacts caused by
the Relocation.
Each of the major actions noted above
encompasses several construction
projects to provide required facilities
and infrastructure. Most of the major
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Sep 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
actions and their supporting projects
have alternative sites located throughout
the island of Guam. This ROD will
document and demonstrate why DoD
has chosen to implement the preferred
alternatives for each of the actions
described in the EIS, except as noted
above.
Because DoN and Army are preparing
this ROD as a joint effort, both concur
and support the decisions expressed
within it. The ROD includes
descriptions and discussions of the
proposed actions and their impacts. It
also includes descriptions and
discussions of all related actions and
their impacts. Combined, these two
elements—proposed and related actions,
with associated impacts—provide the
context for consideration of the
collective and cumulative impacts
associated with all actions addressed in
the EIS.
While this ROD represents the
decisions of DoN and Army regarding
the proposed actions, Federal agencies
have greatly contributed to formulating
and refining the approach to
implementing actions and associated
mitigation measures. Led by Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) facilitated
discussions, DoD reached major
agreements with various Federal
regulatory agencies regarding key issues,
refined action alternatives for Guam’s
potable water and wastewater systems,
committed to the use of force flow
reduction and Adaptive Program
Management (APM) as mitigation
measures, and established a CivilMilitary Coordination Council (CMCC)
to implement APM. All of these actions
are discussed with greater detail within
the ROD. DoN would like to recognize
the efforts of CEQ, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the Department of Interior (DOI),
the National Oceanographic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
and the Government of Guam Agencies
and thank them for their participation
and assistance in seeking resolution to
the many challenges confronting DoD in
the completion of the NEPA process for
this proposed action. It is also
recognized that as the military
construction projects necessary to
implement the actions move forward,
each of these agencies will have a
continuing role through either a
regulatory, permitting, or advisory
capacity and will continue to partner in
the implementation of the actions.
This ROD was prepared in accordance
with CEQ Regulations for Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of NEPA 40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508 and specifically,
40 CFR 1505.2—Record of decision in
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60439
cases requiring environmental impact
statements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Darrell Molzan, Environmental Director,
Joint Guam Program Office, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Energy,
Installations and Environment), 1000
Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (Section 101 et
seq. of NEPA); the regulations of the
President’s Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) that implement NEPA
procedures (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508);
Department of Defense (DoD)
Instruction 4715.9, Environmental
Planning and Analysis; and applicable
DoN environmental regulations and
instructions that implement these laws
and regulations, the DoN announces its
decision to relocate U.S. Marines Corps
forces from Okinawa, Japan to Guam,
construct the infrastructure to support
this relocation effort, and conduct
training and operations on Guam and
Tinian with the relocated Marine Corps
forces. Additionally, the Navy
announces its decision to construct and
operate a berth for a transient nuclear
aircraft carrier in Guam. The Army
announces its decision regarding
construction and operation of AMDTF
facilities on Guam if tasked in the future
with the mission of providing ballistic
missile defense for Guam. Additionally,
DoN announces it decision regarding
the preferred solutions for roadway and
utility system improvements on Guam
to support the military buildup.
To implement the actions necessary
for relocating U.S. Marine Corps forces
from Okinawa to Guam, the DoN has
decided to select all of the preferred
alternatives described in Volumes 2, 3
and 6 of the EIS and to implement all
mitigation measures noted in this ROD,
except as noted below. Relative to
Volume 2 and the construction and
operation of facilities on Guam, the
major actions and decisions include the
following: (1) For a main cantonment
area DoN selects Alternative 2.
Implementation of this alternative
would involve utilizing DoD-owned
lands at NCTS Finegayan and South
Finegayan Navy Housing and acquiring
non-DoD-owned land known as the
former FAA parcel. (2) For access to the
Naval Munitions Site (NMS) DoN
selects Alternative B, which involves
the use of the existing hiking trail as the
access road. (3) For the location of
additional ammunition storage at NMS
DoN selects Alternative A, the use of
Parson’s Road. (4) For airfield functions
DoN selects the following actions:
beddown of the Marine Corps Air
Combat Element (ACE) and construction
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
60440
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 189 / Thursday, September 30, 2010 / Notices
of associated facilities at Andersen AFB
North Ramp, construction of air
embarkation facilities at Andersen AFB
South Ramp, and construction of the
North Gate and access road at Andersen
AFB. (5) For Marine Corps embarkation
facilities DoN selects to refurbish
various wharfs and upgrade utilities to
support waterfront functions and
operations at Naval Base Guam,
associated dredging and dredge disposal
management (with a priority for
beneficial reuse of dredge material),
relocation of military working dog
kennels at Naval Base Guam, and
construction of a medical/dental clinic
at Naval Base Guam.
Relative to the construction and
operation of a live-fire training range
complex on Guam, DoN has elected to
defer selection of a specific site in the
Route 15 area pending completion of the
Section 106 consultation process under
the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA). Alternative A remains DoN’s
preferred alternative. Upon completion
of the Section 106 consultation process,
should DoN select this alternative it
would involve the acquisition of
approximately 1,090 acres of non-DoD
owned lands on a plateau across from
Andersen AFB South along Route 15.
Relative to Volume 3 and actions on
Tinian, DoN selects Alternative 1,
which will involve the construction and
operation of Known Distance (KD) rifle,
Pistol/MP, Platoon, and Field live fire
training ranges on north/northeast,
north, or northeast alignments
respectively.
Relative to Volume 6 and solutions to
meet required utilities improvements
necessary to support the military buildup on Guam: (1) For power DoN selects
solutions that will include
reconditioning up to five (5) existing
GPA combustion turbine (CT) power
generation units. Additionally, the
power solution will involve power
transmission and distribution line
upgrades to provide the appropriate
level of reliability to serve military
needs at Apra Harbor, NCTS Finegayan,
and Andersen AFB. (2) For potable
water DoN selects solutions that will
include the provision of an additional
potable water capacity of 11.3 million
gallons per day (MGd) through the
establishment of up to 22 new DoD
water wells at Andersen AFB,
rehabilitation of existing wells,
interconnects with the GWA water
system, and construction of associated
treatment, storage and transmission
systems. (3) For wastewater DoN selects
solutions that will include repairs and
upgrades to primary treatment
capabilities at the Northern District
Waste Water Treatment Plant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Sep 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
(NDWWTP), improvements to the
NDWWTP to achieve secondary
treatment standards and expansion of
the plant beyond the current design
capacity of 12 MGd, improvements to
the Northern and Central wastewater
collection systems, and improvements
˚ ˜
to the Hagatna WWTP to achieve
secondary treatment standards. (4) For
solid waste DoN selects solutions that
will continue the use of existing Navy
Apra Harbor landfill until the new
GovGuam public landfill at Layon is
completed.
Relative to Volume 6 and roadway
improvements DoN selects Alternative
2, Limited Roadway Improvements,
which involves a limited number of offbase roadway and intersection
improvement projects that have
received DAR certification or that have
been deemed DAR-eligible. These
projects include roadway widening,
intersection improvements, bridge
replacements, pavement strengthening
at specific locations island-wide, and
military access points as well as the
realignment of a portion of Route 15.
Based on the level of concern
expressed in comments on the Draft EIS,
continued discussions with cooperating
agencies under NEPA, and the DoN’s
continuing commitment to
environmental stewardship, the DoN
has elected to defer selection of a
specific site for the construction and
operation of a transient aircraft carrier
berth within Apra Harbor for the near
term. However, the analysis presented
in the EIS, including the marine
resources impacts analysis, provides
sufficient information to allow the DoN
to fully consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative environmental impacts of
locating a transient aircraft carrier berth
and make a programmatic decision to
locate a transient aircraft carrier berth
generally within Apra Harbor, which is
the only deep draft harbor on the island
of Guam that could support such a
berth.
Discussions with the EPA, NOAA,
and the DOI identified additional data
these agencies would prefer were
available for use in analyzing specific
sites for placement of the transient
nuclear aircraft carrier wharf. The Navy
will voluntarily collect additional data
on marine resources in Apra Harbor at
the alternative transient aircraft carrier
berth sites still under consideration by
the Navy as set out in Volume 4 of the
EIS. The type and scope of the
additional data to be collected has been
developed cooperatively with EPA,
NOAA, and DOI and is described in the
‘‘Final Scope of Work Elements for
Marine Surveys of the CVN Transient
Berth Project Area, Potential Mitigation
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
sites, and Habitat Equivalency Analysis’’
included in Volume 9, Appendix J of
the EIS. The additional data collected,
associated analysis, and any other data
that may be required by the United
States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) during the Clean Water Act
(CWA) permitting process, will be used
in the future to inform the subsequent
selection of a specific site for the
transient aircraft carrier berth and to
support any future CWA permitting
decisions for the selected site, including
compensatory mitigation.
As of the signatory date of this ROD,
the DoD has not decided to assign this
mission to the Army nor to construct
and operate an AMDTF on Guam. The
decision on whether to assign this
mission to the Army, and subsequently
construct and operate an AMDTF on
Guam, will be made pending the results
of the ongoing regional and global
Ballistic Missile Defense architectural
and capability studies. Guam is one site
that is under consideration for an
AMDTF mission. The EIS was prepared
noting that if the mission were assigned
to Army, the alternatives presented in
the EIS best represent how Army will
implement the action on Guam. Army
has selected the preferred alternatives
described within Volume 5 of the EIS as
the appropriate and desired manner to
implement the proposed action if and
when the mission is assigned.
The full text of the ROD is available
at https://www.guambuildupeis.us. Hard
copies of the ROD will be available at
the following locations: University of
Guam Robert F. Kennedy Memorial
Library, Government Documents Tan
Siu Lin Building, UOG Station,
Mangilao, GU 96923; Nieves M. Flores
Memorial Library, 254 Martyr Street,
˚ ˜
Hagatna, GU 96910; Tinian Public
Library, P.O. Box 520704, Tinian, MP
96952; Joeten-Kiyu Public Library, P.O.
Box 501092, Saipan, MP 96950;
Olympio T. Borja Memorial Library,
P.O. Box 501250, Saipan, MP 96950.
Dated: September 23, 2010.
D.J. Werner
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–24478 Filed 9–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60438-60440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24478]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for the Guam and Commonwealth of Northern
Mariana Islands Military Relocation: Relocating Marines from Okinawa,
Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Air and Missile Defense Task
Force
Lead Agency: Department of the Navy, DoD.
Cooperating Agency: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) and the Department of the
Army (Army), after carefully weighing the environmental consequences of
the proposed action, as well as considering operational and training
requirements, strategic requirements, obligations under treaties and
other international agreements, and cost, announce their decision to
proceed with Guam and Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI)
Military Relocation.
As a result of redefining the United States (U.S.) defense posture
in the Pacific region and the U.S. alliance with Japan, a portion of
U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) forces currently located in Okinawa, Japan
will be relocated to Guam. This relocation of USMC forces will meet
international agreement and treaty requirements and fulfill U.S.
national security policy requirements to provide mutual defense, deter
aggression, and dissuade coercion in the Western Pacific Region in
response to the evolving security environment in the Pacific region, as
identified through the Integrated Global Presence and Basing Strategy
and the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). The redefining of the U.S.
defense posture in the Pacific also calls for greater availability of
aircraft carrier strike groups in the Pacific to support engagement,
presence, and deterrence. Finally, in support of the proposed military
relocation, the stationing of an Air and Missile Defense Task Force
(AMDTF) is also being considered. A significant number of countries
have ballistic missile capabilities which can deliver conventional,
nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Other countries are working
to establish these capabilities and missile systems. The effective
strike range of defensive ballistic missile systems dictates that they
must be located in the proximity of the protected assets. The need for
the proposed AMDTF is to protect the territory of Guam, its citizens,
U.S. and allied forces on Guam from the threat of harm from ballistic
missile attacks from other countries and enemies of the U.S.
Implementing the military relocation analyzed in the Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will be a multi-agency, multi-year effort
undertaken by the DoN, Army, Department of Transportation's Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), Guam utilities, Guam agencies, and
various private entities. Implementation includes several components:
(1) Marine Corps: (a) Development and construction of facilities
and infrastructure to support approximately 8,600 Marines and their
9,000 dependents being relocated from Okinawa to Guam. (b) Development
and construction of facilities and infrastructure to support training
and operations on Guam and Tinian (located in the CNMI).
DoN has elected to defer selection of a specific site for the
construction and operation of a live fire training range complex in the
Route 15 area in Guam pending completion of the Section 106
consultation process under the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA). Likewise, a selection regarding implementation of a roadway
improvement project calling for a realignment of Route 15 is hereby
deferred pending selection of a specific site for the construction.
[[Page 60439]]
(2) Navy: Construction of a new deep-draft wharf with shoreside
infrastructure improvements creating the capability in Apra Harbor,
Guam to support a transient nuclear powered aircraft carrier.
DoN has elected to defer selection of a specific site for the
construction and operation of a transient aircraft carrier berth within
Apra Harbor for the near term. However, the analysis presented in the
EIS, including the marine resources impacts analysis, provides
sufficient information to allow the DoN to fully consider the direct,
indirect and cumulative environmental impacts of locating a transient
aircraft carrier berth and make a programmatic decision to locate a
transient aircraft carrier berth generally within Apra Harbor, which is
the only deep draft harbor on the island of Guam that could support
such a berth.
(3) Army: Development of facilities and infrastructure on Guam to
support relocating approximately 600 military personnel and their 900
dependents to establish and operate an Air and Missile Defense Task
Force (AMDTF).
As of the date of this Record of Decision (ROD), the Department of
Defense (DoD) has not decided to construct and operate an AMDTF on
Guam. The decision on whether to assign this mission to the Army will
be made pending the results of the ongoing regional and global
Ballistic Missile Defense architectural and capability studies. It will
also be based in part on the EIS for this proposed action with Guam as
one site that is under consideration for an AMDTF mission. The EIS was
prepared noting that if the mission were assigned to Army, the
alternatives presented in the EIS represent how Army could implement
the action on Guam. Army has selected the preferred alternatives
described in Volume 5 of the EIS as the appropriate manner to implement
the proposed action if and when the mission is assigned.
(4) Utilities: Renovation and development of additional capacity
for power, water, and wastewater systems, both on base and off base, to
support the increased demand from the new Marine Corps Base and
associated growth in DoD and civilian population caused by the
Relocation.
(5) Off-base Roadways: Improvements to off base roads, bridges, and
intersections to support increased traffic and offset significant
impacts caused by the Relocation.
Each of the major actions noted above encompasses several
construction projects to provide required facilities and
infrastructure. Most of the major actions and their supporting projects
have alternative sites located throughout the island of Guam. This ROD
will document and demonstrate why DoD has chosen to implement the
preferred alternatives for each of the actions described in the EIS,
except as noted above.
Because DoN and Army are preparing this ROD as a joint effort, both
concur and support the decisions expressed within it. The ROD includes
descriptions and discussions of the proposed actions and their impacts.
It also includes descriptions and discussions of all related actions
and their impacts. Combined, these two elements--proposed and related
actions, with associated impacts--provide the context for consideration
of the collective and cumulative impacts associated with all actions
addressed in the EIS.
While this ROD represents the decisions of DoN and Army regarding
the proposed actions, Federal agencies have greatly contributed to
formulating and refining the approach to implementing actions and
associated mitigation measures. Led by Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) facilitated discussions, DoD reached major agreements with
various Federal regulatory agencies regarding key issues, refined
action alternatives for Guam's potable water and wastewater systems,
committed to the use of force flow reduction and Adaptive Program
Management (APM) as mitigation measures, and established a Civil-
Military Coordination Council (CMCC) to implement APM. All of these
actions are discussed with greater detail within the ROD. DoN would
like to recognize the efforts of CEQ, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the Department of Interior (DOI), the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the Government
of Guam Agencies and thank them for their participation and assistance
in seeking resolution to the many challenges confronting DoD in the
completion of the NEPA process for this proposed action. It is also
recognized that as the military construction projects necessary to
implement the actions move forward, each of these agencies will have a
continuing role through either a regulatory, permitting, or advisory
capacity and will continue to partner in the implementation of the
actions.
This ROD was prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA 40 CFR parts 1500 to
1508 and specifically, 40 CFR 1505.2--Record of decision in cases
requiring environmental impact statements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Darrell Molzan, Environmental
Director, Joint Guam Program Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary
of the Navy (Energy, Installations and Environment), 1000 Navy
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (Section
101 et seq. of NEPA); the regulations of the President's Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) that implement NEPA procedures (40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508); Department of Defense (DoD) Instruction 4715.9,
Environmental Planning and Analysis; and applicable DoN environmental
regulations and instructions that implement these laws and regulations,
the DoN announces its decision to relocate U.S. Marines Corps forces
from Okinawa, Japan to Guam, construct the infrastructure to support
this relocation effort, and conduct training and operations on Guam and
Tinian with the relocated Marine Corps forces. Additionally, the Navy
announces its decision to construct and operate a berth for a transient
nuclear aircraft carrier in Guam. The Army announces its decision
regarding construction and operation of AMDTF facilities on Guam if
tasked in the future with the mission of providing ballistic missile
defense for Guam. Additionally, DoN announces it decision regarding the
preferred solutions for roadway and utility system improvements on Guam
to support the military buildup.
To implement the actions necessary for relocating U.S. Marine Corps
forces from Okinawa to Guam, the DoN has decided to select all of the
preferred alternatives described in Volumes 2, 3 and 6 of the EIS and
to implement all mitigation measures noted in this ROD, except as noted
below. Relative to Volume 2 and the construction and operation of
facilities on Guam, the major actions and decisions include the
following: (1) For a main cantonment area DoN selects Alternative 2.
Implementation of this alternative would involve utilizing DoD-owned
lands at NCTS Finegayan and South Finegayan Navy Housing and acquiring
non-DoD-owned land known as the former FAA parcel. (2) For access to
the Naval Munitions Site (NMS) DoN selects Alternative B, which
involves the use of the existing hiking trail as the access road. (3)
For the location of additional ammunition storage at NMS DoN selects
Alternative A, the use of Parson's Road. (4) For airfield functions DoN
selects the following actions: beddown of the Marine Corps Air Combat
Element (ACE) and construction
[[Page 60440]]
of associated facilities at Andersen AFB North Ramp, construction of
air embarkation facilities at Andersen AFB South Ramp, and construction
of the North Gate and access road at Andersen AFB. (5) For Marine Corps
embarkation facilities DoN selects to refurbish various wharfs and
upgrade utilities to support waterfront functions and operations at
Naval Base Guam, associated dredging and dredge disposal management
(with a priority for beneficial reuse of dredge material), relocation
of military working dog kennels at Naval Base Guam, and construction of
a medical/dental clinic at Naval Base Guam.
Relative to the construction and operation of a live-fire training
range complex on Guam, DoN has elected to defer selection of a specific
site in the Route 15 area pending completion of the Section 106
consultation process under the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA). Alternative A remains DoN's preferred alternative. Upon
completion of the Section 106 consultation process, should DoN select
this alternative it would involve the acquisition of approximately
1,090 acres of non-DoD owned lands on a plateau across from Andersen
AFB South along Route 15.
Relative to Volume 3 and actions on Tinian, DoN selects Alternative
1, which will involve the construction and operation of Known Distance
(KD) rifle, Pistol/MP, Platoon, and Field live fire training ranges on
north/northeast, north, or northeast alignments respectively.
Relative to Volume 6 and solutions to meet required utilities
improvements necessary to support the military build-up on Guam: (1)
For power DoN selects solutions that will include reconditioning up to
five (5) existing GPA combustion turbine (CT) power generation units.
Additionally, the power solution will involve power transmission and
distribution line upgrades to provide the appropriate level of
reliability to serve military needs at Apra Harbor, NCTS Finegayan, and
Andersen AFB. (2) For potable water DoN selects solutions that will
include the provision of an additional potable water capacity of 11.3
million gallons per day (MGd) through the establishment of up to 22 new
DoD water wells at Andersen AFB, rehabilitation of existing wells,
interconnects with the GWA water system, and construction of associated
treatment, storage and transmission systems. (3) For wastewater DoN
selects solutions that will include repairs and upgrades to primary
treatment capabilities at the Northern District Waste Water Treatment
Plant (NDWWTP), improvements to the NDWWTP to achieve secondary
treatment standards and expansion of the plant beyond the current
design capacity of 12 MGd, improvements to the Northern and Central
wastewater collection systems, and improvements to the
Hag[aring]t[ntilde]a WWTP to achieve secondary treatment standards. (4)
For solid waste DoN selects solutions that will continue the use of
existing Navy Apra Harbor landfill until the new GovGuam public
landfill at Layon is completed.
Relative to Volume 6 and roadway improvements DoN selects
Alternative 2, Limited Roadway Improvements, which involves a limited
number of off-base roadway and intersection improvement projects that
have received DAR certification or that have been deemed DAR-eligible.
These projects include roadway widening, intersection improvements,
bridge replacements, pavement strengthening at specific locations
island-wide, and military access points as well as the realignment of a
portion of Route 15.
Based on the level of concern expressed in comments on the Draft
EIS, continued discussions with cooperating agencies under NEPA, and
the DoN's continuing commitment to environmental stewardship, the DoN
has elected to defer selection of a specific site for the construction
and operation of a transient aircraft carrier berth within Apra Harbor
for the near term. However, the analysis presented in the EIS,
including the marine resources impacts analysis, provides sufficient
information to allow the DoN to fully consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative environmental impacts of locating a transient aircraft
carrier berth and make a programmatic decision to locate a transient
aircraft carrier berth generally within Apra Harbor, which is the only
deep draft harbor on the island of Guam that could support such a
berth.
Discussions with the EPA, NOAA, and the DOI identified additional
data these agencies would prefer were available for use in analyzing
specific sites for placement of the transient nuclear aircraft carrier
wharf. The Navy will voluntarily collect additional data on marine
resources in Apra Harbor at the alternative transient aircraft carrier
berth sites still under consideration by the Navy as set out in Volume
4 of the EIS. The type and scope of the additional data to be collected
has been developed cooperatively with EPA, NOAA, and DOI and is
described in the ``Final Scope of Work Elements for Marine Surveys of
the CVN Transient Berth Project Area, Potential Mitigation sites, and
Habitat Equivalency Analysis'' included in Volume 9, Appendix J of the
EIS. The additional data collected, associated analysis, and any other
data that may be required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) during the Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting process, will be
used in the future to inform the subsequent selection of a specific
site for the transient aircraft carrier berth and to support any future
CWA permitting decisions for the selected site, including compensatory
mitigation.
As of the signatory date of this ROD, the DoD has not decided to
assign this mission to the Army nor to construct and operate an AMDTF
on Guam. The decision on whether to assign this mission to the Army,
and subsequently construct and operate an AMDTF on Guam, will be made
pending the results of the ongoing regional and global Ballistic
Missile Defense architectural and capability studies. Guam is one site
that is under consideration for an AMDTF mission. The EIS was prepared
noting that if the mission were assigned to Army, the alternatives
presented in the EIS best represent how Army will implement the action
on Guam. Army has selected the preferred alternatives described within
Volume 5 of the EIS as the appropriate and desired manner to implement
the proposed action if and when the mission is assigned.
The full text of the ROD is available at https://www.guambuildupeis.us. Hard copies of the ROD will be available at the
following locations: University of Guam Robert F. Kennedy Memorial
Library, Government Documents Tan Siu Lin Building, UOG Station,
Mangilao, GU 96923; Nieves M. Flores Memorial Library, 254 Martyr
Street, Hag[aring]t[ntilde]a, GU 96910; Tinian Public Library, P.O. Box
520704, Tinian, MP 96952; Joeten-Kiyu Public Library, P.O. Box 501092,
Saipan, MP 96950; Olympio T. Borja Memorial Library, P.O. Box 501250,
Saipan, MP 96950.
Dated: September 23, 2010.
D.J. Werner
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24478 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P