Safety Zone: Monte Foundation Firework Display, Monterey, CA, 59963-59966 [2010-24364]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
frequency different than that required
under this paragraph. The sponsor may
also propose and adopt a different
reporting format or frequency if the
change is agreed to in advance by the
director of the FDA review division that
has responsibility for review of the IND.
(4) Investigations of marketed drugs.
A sponsor of a clinical study of a drug
marketed or approved in the United
States that is conducted under an IND
is required to submit IND safety reports
for suspected adverse reactions that are
observed in the clinical study, at
domestic or foreign study sites. The
sponsor must also submit safety
information from the clinical study as
prescribed by the postmarketing safety
reporting requirements (e.g., §§ 310.305,
314.80, and 600.80 of this chapter).
(5) Reporting study endpoints. Study
endpoints (e.g., mortality or major
morbidity) must be reported to FDA by
the sponsor as described in the protocol
and ordinarily would not be reported
under paragraph (c) of this section.
However, if a serious and unexpected
adverse event occurs for which there is
evidence suggesting a causal
relationship between the drug and the
event (e.g., death from anaphylaxis), the
event must be reported under
§ 312.32(c)(1)(i) as a serious and
unexpected suspected adverse reaction
even if it is a component of the study
endpoint (e.g., all-cause mortality).
(d) Followup. (1) The sponsor must
promptly investigate all safety
information it receives.
(2) Relevant followup information to
an IND safety report must be submitted
as soon as the information is available
and must be identified as such, i.e.,
‘‘Followup IND Safety Report.’’
(3) If the results of a sponsor’s
investigation show that an adverse event
not initially determined to be reportable
under paragraph (c) of this section is so
reportable, the sponsor must report such
suspected adverse reaction in an IND
safety report as soon as possible, but in
no case later than 15 calendar days after
the determination is made.
(e) Disclaimer. A safety report or other
information submitted by a sponsor
under this part (and any release by FDA
of that report or information) does not
necessarily reflect a conclusion by the
sponsor or FDA that the report or
information constitutes an admission
that the drug caused or contributed to
an adverse event. A sponsor need not
admit, and may deny, that the report or
information submitted by the sponsor
constitutes an admission that the drug
caused or contributed to an adverse
event.
■ 3. Section 312.64 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 312.64
Investigator reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Safety reports. An investigator
must immediately report to the sponsor
any serious adverse event, whether or
not considered drug related, including
those listed in the protocol or
investigator brochure and must include
an assessment of whether there is a
reasonable possibility that the drug
caused the event. Study endpoints that
are serious adverse events (e.g., allcause mortality) must be reported in
accordance with the protocol unless
there is evidence suggesting a causal
relationship between the drug and the
event (e.g., death from anaphylaxis). In
that case, the investigator must
immediately report the event to the
sponsor. The investigator must record
nonserious adverse events and report
them to the sponsor according to the
timetable for reporting specified in the
protocol.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 320—BIOAVAILABILITY AND
BIOEQUIVALENCE REQUIREMENTS
59963
study, including any contract research
organization, must also notify FDA of
any fatal or life-threatening adverse
event from the study as soon as possible
but in no case later than 7 calendar days
after becoming aware of its occurrence.
Each notification under this paragraph
must be submitted to the Director,
Office of Generic Drugs in the Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research at FDA.
Relevant followup information to a
bioavailability/bioequivalence safety
report must be submitted as soon as the
information is available and must be
identified as such, i.e., ‘‘Followup
bioavailability/bioequivalence safety
report.’’ Upon request from FDA, the
person conducting the study, including
any contract research organization, must
submit to FDA any additional data or
information that the agency deems
necessary, as soon as possible, but in no
case later than 15 calendar days after
receiving the request.
Dated: September 23, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–24296 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am]
4. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 320 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 355,
371.
5. Section 320.31 is amended in
paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ and by adding in its
place the word ‘‘must,’’ and by removing
‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (d)(1) and
replacing ‘‘this chapter.’’ at the end of
paragraph (d)(2) with ‘‘this chapter;
and’’, and by adding paragraph (d)(3) to
read as follows:
■
§ 320.31 Applicability of requirements
regarding an ‘‘Investigational New Drug
Application.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) The person conducting the study,
including any contract research
organization, must notify FDA and all
participating investigators of any serious
adverse event, as defined in § 312.32(a),
observed during the conduct of the
study as soon as possible but in no case
later than 15 calendar days after
becoming aware of its occurrence. Each
report must be submitted on FDA Form
3500A or in an electronic format that
FDA can process, review, and archive.
FDA will periodically issue guidance on
how to provide the electronic
submission (e.g., method of
transmission, media, file formats,
preparation and organization of files).
Each report must bear prominent
identification of its contents, i.e.,
‘‘bioavailability/bioequivalence safety
report.’’ The person conducting the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0620]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: Monte Foundation
Firework Display, Monterey, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters of Monterey Bay
off the fishing pier of Seacliff State
Beach, Santa Cruz, CA in support of the
Monte Foundation Firework Display.
This safety zone is established to ensure
the safety of participants and spectators
from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without permission from
the Captain of the Port or her designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
through 9:30 p.m. on October 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0620 and are available online by going
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
59964
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0620 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Ensign Liz Ellerson,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco;
telephone 415–399–7436, e-mail D11PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that it
would be impracticable to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
event would occur before the
rulemaking process would be
completed. Because of the dangers
posed by the pyrotechnics used in this
fireworks display, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators, spectator
craft, and other vessels transiting the
event area. For the safety concerns
noted, it is in the public interest to have
these regulations in effect during the
event.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Basis and Purpose
The Monte Foundation Firework
Display is scheduled to take place on
October 8, 2010, on the navigable waters
of Seacliff State Beach, in Monterey Bay,
off of Santa Cruz, CA. The fireworks
display is meant for entertainment
purposes. This safety zone is issued to
establish a temporary restricted area on
the waters surrounding the fireworks
launch site during loading of the
pyrotechnics, and during the fireworks
display. This restricted area around the
launch site is necessary to protect
spectators, vessels, and other property
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
from the hazards associated with the
pyrotechnics on the fireworks barges.
The Coast Guard has granted the event
sponsor a marine event permit for the
fireworks display.
Discussion of Rule
During the set up of the fireworks and
until the start of the fireworks display,
the temporary safety zone applies to the
navigable waters around the fireworks
site within a radius of 100 feet. From
8:45 p.m. until 9:05 p.m., the area to
which the temporary safety zone applies
will increase in size to encompass the
navigable waters around the fireworks
site within a radius of 1,000 feet.
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the fireworks site while the
fireworks are set up, and until the
conclusion of the scheduled display.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations
are needed to keep spectators and
vessels away from the immediate
vicinity of the fireworks barge to ensure
the safety of participants, spectators,
and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes and
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be
affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for several
reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely
around the area, (ii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected
portion of the areas off San Francisco,
CA to engage in these activities, (iii) this
rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway for a limited
period of time, and (iv) the maritime
public will be advised in advance of this
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59965
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–359 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–359 Safety zone; Monte
Foundation Firework Display, Santa Cruz,
CA
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established for the waters of
Seacliff State Beach, in Monterey Bay,
off of Santa Cruz, CA. The fireworks
launch site will be located in position
36°58′11.20″ N, 121°54′36.79″ W (NAD
83). From 7 a.m. through 8:44 p.m., and
from 9:06 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on
October 8, 2010, the temporary safety
zone applies to the navigable waters
around the fireworks site within a
radius of 100 feet. From 8:45 p.m. until
9:05 p.m. the area to which the
temporary safety zone applies will
increase in size to encompass the
navigable waters around the fireworks
site within a radius of 1,000 feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal,
State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San
Francisco (COTP) in the enforcement of
the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this title, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone 415–399–
3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 7 a.m. through 9:30 p.m.
on October 8, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
59966
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: September 15, 2010.
C.L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
entitled: Safety Zone; New York Air
Show at Jones Beach State Park, Atlantic
Ocean off of Jones Beach, Wantagh, NY,
in the Federal Register (75 FR 20802).
We received no comments or requests
for a public meeting on the proposed
rule.
[FR Doc. 2010–24364 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Basis and Purpose
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0138]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; New York Air Show at
Jones Beach State Park, Wantagh, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a permanent safety zone for
the annual New York Air Show at Jones
Beach State Park in Wantagh, New York.
This safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of navigation and
protection of the maritime public from
the hazards inherent with an air show
which consists of aircraft performing
aerobatic maneuvers over the Atlantic
Ocean off of Jones Beach State Park.
DATES: This rule is effective October 29,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0138 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0138 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail: Petty Officer Joseph Graun,
Prevention Department, USCG Sector
Long Island Sound at 203–468–4459, email: Joseph.L.Graun@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
On April 21, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Air Show consists of aircraft
performing aerobatics in close proximity
to other aircraft over a specified area of
the Atlantic Ocean off of Jones Beach
State Park. The safety zone will provide
for the safety of the maritime
community and spectators viewing the
Air Show from the water should an
accident, such as a collision of aircraft,
occur during the Show.
Entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Long Island Sound or by
Designated On-scene Patrol Personnel.
Any violation of the safety zone
described herein is punishable by,
among other things, civil and criminal
penalties, in rem liability against the
offending vessel, and the initiation of
suspension or revocation proceedings
against Coast Guard-issued merchant
mariner credentials.
Background
The New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation
sponsors an annual air show at Jones
Beach State Park during the week before
Memorial Day. In the past the Coast
Guard established temporary regulations
for this event every year and was not
previously published in the CFR. The
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking process
provided the opportunity for public
comments to be voiced and eliminated
the unnecessary burden of establishing
temporary rules every year.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
During the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking process, the sponsor of the
event informed the Coast Guard that the
dates of the enforcement period needed
to be changed. The original proposed
dates for the safety zone were from May
24, 2010 until May 30, 2010 allowing
enforcement of the safety zone during
the air show practice sessions. There
will no longer be a practice session;
therefore, the safety zone will only be
needed during the main event on the
Thursday through Sunday before
Memorial Day in May.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
those portions of the Atlantic Ocean off
of Jones Beach State Park, Jones Beach,
New York covered by the safety zone.
This regulation may have some
impact on the public, but the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: The zone would only
be enforced for a temporary period each
day over a four day period; and vessels
may transit in all areas around the zone
at all times.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59963-59966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24364]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0620]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: Monte Foundation Firework Display, Monterey, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Monterey Bay off the fishing pier of Seacliff State
Beach, Santa Cruz, CA in support of the Monte Foundation Firework
Display. This safety zone is established to ensure the safety of
participants and spectators from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone
without permission from the Captain of the Port or her designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. through 9:30 p.m. on October
8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0620 and are available online
by going
[[Page 59964]]
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0620 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Ensign Liz Ellerson, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-7436, e-mail D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that it
would be impracticable to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because the event would occur before
the rulemaking process would be completed. Because of the dangers posed
by the pyrotechnics used in this fireworks display, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it is in the public interest to have these
regulations in effect during the event.
Basis and Purpose
The Monte Foundation Firework Display is scheduled to take place on
October 8, 2010, on the navigable waters of Seacliff State Beach, in
Monterey Bay, off of Santa Cruz, CA. The fireworks display is meant for
entertainment purposes. This safety zone is issued to establish a
temporary restricted area on the waters surrounding the fireworks
launch site during loading of the pyrotechnics, and during the
fireworks display. This restricted area around the launch site is
necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and other property from the
hazards associated with the pyrotechnics on the fireworks barges. The
Coast Guard has granted the event sponsor a marine event permit for the
fireworks display.
Discussion of Rule
During the set up of the fireworks and until the start of the
fireworks display, the temporary safety zone applies to the navigable
waters around the fireworks site within a radius of 100 feet. From 8:45
p.m. until 9:05 p.m., the area to which the temporary safety zone
applies will increase in size to encompass the navigable waters around
the fireworks site within a radius of 1,000 feet.
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the fireworks site while the fireworks
are set up, and until the conclusion of the scheduled display. Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep spectators and vessels away from the
immediate vicinity of the fireworks barge to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes and executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because the local waterway users will be notified via public Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and sightseeing. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for several reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely around the
area, (ii) vessels engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected portion of the areas off San
Francisco, CA to engage in these activities, (iii) this rule will
encompass only a small portion of the waterway for a limited period of
time, and (iv) the maritime public will be advised in advance of this
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed
[[Page 59965]]
this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-359 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-359 Safety zone; Monte Foundation Firework Display,
Santa Cruz, CA
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established for the
waters of Seacliff State Beach, in Monterey Bay, off of Santa Cruz, CA.
The fireworks launch site will be located in position 36[deg]58'11.20''
N, 121[deg]54'36.79'' W (NAD 83). From 7 a.m. through 8:44 p.m., and
from 9:06 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on October 8, 2010, the temporary safety
zone applies to the navigable waters around the fireworks site within a
radius of 100 feet. From 8:45 p.m. until 9:05 p.m. the area to which
the temporary safety zone applies will increase in size to encompass
the navigable waters around the fireworks site within a radius of 1,000
feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec. 165.23
of this title, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone 415-399-3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is effective from 7 a.m. through
9:30 p.m. on October 8, 2010.
[[Page 59966]]
Dated: September 15, 2010.
C.L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010-24364 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P