Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Skokomish General Investigation Study, Mason County, WA, 58372-58373 [2010-23946]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
58372
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Notices
reasonable measures that would avoid
or mitigate environmental effects will
also be analyzed. Additionally, the
USMC will undertake any consultations
required by the Endangered Species Act,
Clean Water Act, National Historic
Preservation Act, and any other
applicable law or regulation.
In accordance with the Engle Act of
1958, and the Federal Lands Policy and
Management Act of 1976, the DoN is
required to file an application with the
BLM requesting the Secretary of the
Interior process a proposed legislative
withdrawal and reservation of public
land to continue military training
exercises at the CMAGR. The proposed
alternatives would withdraw at least
222,041 but not more than 242,058 acres
of public land. As a result of the
proposed boundary restructuring,
approximately 15,347 acres of public
land not in the existing 226,711 acre
withdrawal would be withdrawn. The
restructured boundary would offer the
best opportunities to define and manage
a secure boundary for the CMAGR,
safeguard public use of adjacent public
land, and consolidate holdings for more
efficient environmental stewardship.
The public land would be withdrawn
from all forms of appropriation under
the public land laws, including surface
entry, mining, mineral leasing, and the
Materials Act of 1947.
L–EIS Schedule: This notice is the
first phase of the L–EIS process and
announces the 90-day public comment
period and public scoping meetings to
identify community concerns and local
issues that should be addressed in the
L–EIS. The next phase occurs when a
Notice of Availability (NOA) is
published in the Federal Register and
local media to publicly announce the
release of the Draft L–EIS. A minimum
45-day public comment period for the
Draft L–EIS will commence upon
publication of the NOA in the Federal
Register. The USMC will consider and
respond to all comments received on the
Draft L–EIS when preparing the Final L–
EIS. After publication of the Draft L–
EIS, one or more public hearings will be
held, and public notice will be given
regarding the time and place of the
hearing(s). The Draft L–EIS will be
available for public and agency review
and comment before the public
hearing(s).
Dated: September 17, 2010.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–23984 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Sep 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
Skokomish General Investigation
Study, Mason County, WA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
will prepare an Integrated Feasibility
Report/Environmental Impact Statement
(FR/EIS) for proposed ecosystem
restoration and flood risk management
in the Skokomish River Basin which
empties into Hood Canal, near Shelton,
Washington. The Skokomish Indian
Tribe and Mason County are the nonFederal sponsors for the project.
The Skokomish River General
Investigation (GI) Feasibility Study for
the Skokomish River Basin is being
conducted under the authority of
Section 209 of the Flood Control Act of
1962 (Pub. L. 87–874).
The Skokomish River channel has
been filling with sediment for several
decades, resulting in frequent flooding
and decreasing natural ecosystem
structures, functions, and processes
necessary to support critical fish and
wildlife habitat throughout the
Skokomish River Basin. Increased
sediment load, reduced flows, and
encroachment of the floodplain by manmade structures are leading to
continued degradation of natural
ecosystem functions and habitat. The
degraded riverine and estuarine aquatic
habitat has caused a decline in the
population of critical fish and wildlife
species, including multiple ESA listed
species. Additionally, the channel
capacity of the Skokomish River varies
significantly. Limited channel capacity
causes floodwater to leave the banks at
various locations, ultimately causing
frequent flooding of local roads, two
state highways, agricultural fields,
residences, and other structures.
The Skokomish River GI is a basinwide study; however, work by others,
constrain the limit of Corps’
involvement to actions primarily in the
lower Skokomish River Valley.
Problems, opportunities, and objectives
will be examined within the context of
the entire watershed. Recognizing the
relationships between the upper and
lower watershed will ensure a
comprehensive study overview.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The purpose of the FR/EIS and
feasibility study is to evaluate if there is
a federal interest in aquatic ecosystem
restoration and flood risk management
in the Skokomish River Basin.
DATES: Submit comments by October 25,
2010 on the scope of issues to be
addressed in the draft FR/EIS.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, Environmental Resources
Section, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, P.O. Box 3755, Seattle,
WA 98124–3755. Submit electronic
comments and supporting data to
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the scoping process
or preparation of the draft EIS may be
directed to Mr. Patrick Cagney,
telephone (206) 764–3654, e-mail
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Study Area: The Skokomish River
Basin (Basin) is located in northwest
Washington, predominantly in Mason
County. The project study area is
comprised of the entire drainage basin,
including the estuary at Annas Bay. The
river collects drainage from an
approximate 240 square mile drainage
basin, and eventually flows into
southern Hood Canal, an arm of Puget
Sound. The river flows out of three subbasins (South Fork, North Fork, and
Vance Creek) into a broad, flat alluvial
plain known as the Skokomish River
Valley. The Skokomish Indian
Reservation is located within the lower
valley and extends along the southeast
portion of the Olympic Peninsula. The
Basin is defined by the Water Resource
Inventory Area (WRIA) 16 and is located
within U.S. Congressional District #6 of
Washington State.
2. Alternatives: The EIS will
separately evaluate alternatives for
aquatic ecosystem restoration and flood
risk management. Alternatives that will
be evaluated under aquatic ecosystem
restoration will include an alternative
that uses physical actions to restore the
Basin’s habitat-forming processes and/or
create habitats that have been lost as a
result of historic alterations. Example of
actions that could occur under this
alternative include: increasing
floodplain habitat and connectivity,
restoring off-channel habitat for juvenile
fish, improving estuarine functions and
processes, and increasing emergent and
riparian vegetation. Another alternative
that will be considered will focus on
benefits to the several aquatic species
listed under the Endangered Species
Act. Actions under this alternative
could include creation of spawning and
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Notices
rearing areas, and additional fish
supplementation. The no action
alternative will also be evaluated.
Alternatives for flood risk
management include evaluation of the
current levee system. Actions under this
alternative may include setback levees
to improve flood containment. Another
alternative would study the effects of
sediment removal and actions could
include: sediment traps, dredging and
selective gravel removal. Another
alternative would focus on
nonstructural actions such as flood
proofing and education. The no action
alternative will also be evaluated.
These alternatives are not final and
may change and/or new alternatives
may develop during the scoping and
NEPA process. A range of ecosystem
restoration and flood risk management
actions will be investigated and more
than one option may be included in the
preferred alternative. Additionally, a
number of potential ecosystem
restoration actions could meet ancillary
flood risk management goals.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement:
This notice of intent formally
commences the scoping process under
NEPA. As part of the scoping process,
all affected Federal, state, and local
agencies, Native American tribes,
interested private organizations,
including environmental interest groups
and the general public are invited to
comment on the scope of the draft FR/
EIS. Comments are requested
concerning problems in the basin,
possible project alternatives, mitigation
measures, probable significant
environmental impacts, and permits or
other approvals that may be required.
The environmental review process will
be comprehensive and will satisfy the
requirements of NEPA and other
relevant Federal, state, and local
environmental laws. The public scoping
period will occur over a 30-day period
to commence on September 24, 2010
and will extend through October 25,
2010. The Draft FR/EIS is expected to be
available in November of 2011.
4. Scoping Meeting: One public
scoping meeting will be held on October
7, 2010 to identify issues of major
concern and obtain public input on the
range and acceptability of alternatives.
This meeting will be held at Mason
County Public Works, 100 West Public
Works Drive, Shelton, Washington,
98584. An informal open house will be
held between 4 and 5:30 p.m. A
presentation to summarize the purpose
of scoping and existing information will
be made between 5:30 and 6 p.m. Then,
verbal testimony (maximum 4 minutes)
will be taken between 6 and 7 p.m.
Written comments may be sent by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Sep 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
regular or electronic mail to EIS Scoping
Comments c/o Patrick Cagney (see
ADDRESSES). Ongoing communication
with agencies, Native American tribes,
public interest groups, and interested
citizens will take place throughout the
EIS development through the use of
public meetings, mailings and the
Internet. Additional meetings will be
scheduled upon completion of the draft
EIS.
Anthony Wright,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District
Commander.
[FR Doc. 2010–23946 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive
Patent License; DQE, Inc.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
The invention listed below is
assigned to the United States
Government as represented by the
Secretary of the Navy. The Department
of the Navy hereby gives notice of its
intent to grant to DQE, Inc. a revocable,
nonassignable, exclusive license to
practice in the United States, the
Government-owned invention described
below: U.S. Patent 6,895,871 (Navy Case
84072): Issued May 24, 2005, entitled
‘‘HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
DECONTAMINATION PLATFORM’’.
SUMMARY:
Anyone wishing to object to the
grant of this license has fifteen days
from the date of this notice to file
written objections along with
supporting evidence, if any.
DATES:
Written objections are to be
filed with Naval Surface Warfare Center,
Crane Division, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300
Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522–5001.
ADDRESSES:
Mr.
Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface
Warfare Center, Crane Division, Code
OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane,
IN 47522–5001, telephone 812–854–
4100.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.
Dated: September 17, 2010.
D. J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–23910 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58373
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No. 84.334A (Partnership grants)]
Gaining Early Awareness and
Readiness for Undergraduate
Programs (GEAR UP)
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of intent to fund down
the fiscal year (FY) 2008 grant slate for
the GEAR UP Program.
AGENCY:
The Secretary intends to use
the grant slate developed in FY 2008 for
the GEAR UP Program authorized by
Title IV, Part A of the Higher Education
Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), to make
new grant awards in FY 2010. The
Secretary takes this action because a
significant number of high-quality
applications remain on the FY 2008
grant slate. We expect to use an
estimated $4,481,799 for new awards in
FY 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Davis, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., 6th
Floor, Washington, DC 20006–8524.
Telephone: (202) 502–7676 or via
Internet: James.Davis@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain this document in an accessible
format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 5, 2007, we published
a notice in the Federal Register (72 FR
62449) inviting applications for new
awards under the GEAR UP Program.
In response to this notice, we received
a significant number of high-quality
applications for grants under the GEAR
UP Program and made seven new State
grant awards and 31 new Partnership
grant awards. Additionally, after
determining that the amount of FY 2009
funding available for new GEAR UP
awards was too small to warrant a new
competition, we published a notice in
the Federal Register on May 8, 2009 (74
FR 21671), of our intent to make FY
2009 GEAR UP program awards by
funding down the FY 2008 funding
slate. Accordingly, the Department
awarded new FY 2009 GEAR UP
program awards to the next highest
scoring State proposal and the five next
highest scoring partnership proposals.
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58372-58373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
Skokomish General Investigation Study, Mason County, WA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) will prepare an Integrated Feasibility Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (FR/EIS) for proposed ecosystem restoration and flood
risk management in the Skokomish River Basin which empties into Hood
Canal, near Shelton, Washington. The Skokomish Indian Tribe and Mason
County are the non-Federal sponsors for the project.
The Skokomish River General Investigation (GI) Feasibility Study
for the Skokomish River Basin is being conducted under the authority of
Section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Pub. L. 87-874).
The Skokomish River channel has been filling with sediment for
several decades, resulting in frequent flooding and decreasing natural
ecosystem structures, functions, and processes necessary to support
critical fish and wildlife habitat throughout the Skokomish River
Basin. Increased sediment load, reduced flows, and encroachment of the
floodplain by man-made structures are leading to continued degradation
of natural ecosystem functions and habitat. The degraded riverine and
estuarine aquatic habitat has caused a decline in the population of
critical fish and wildlife species, including multiple ESA listed
species. Additionally, the channel capacity of the Skokomish River
varies significantly. Limited channel capacity causes floodwater to
leave the banks at various locations, ultimately causing frequent
flooding of local roads, two state highways, agricultural fields,
residences, and other structures.
The Skokomish River GI is a basin-wide study; however, work by
others, constrain the limit of Corps' involvement to actions primarily
in the lower Skokomish River Valley. Problems, opportunities, and
objectives will be examined within the context of the entire watershed.
Recognizing the relationships between the upper and lower watershed
will ensure a comprehensive study overview.
The purpose of the FR/EIS and feasibility study is to evaluate if
there is a federal interest in aquatic ecosystem restoration and flood
risk management in the Skokomish River Basin.
DATES: Submit comments by October 25, 2010 on the scope of issues to be
addressed in the draft FR/EIS.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, Environmental Resources Section, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, P.O. Box 3755, Seattle, WA 98124-3755. Submit
electronic comments and supporting data to
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the scoping
process or preparation of the draft EIS may be directed to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, telephone (206) 764-3654, e-mail
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Study Area: The Skokomish River Basin (Basin) is located in
northwest Washington, predominantly in Mason County. The project study
area is comprised of the entire drainage basin, including the estuary
at Annas Bay. The river collects drainage from an approximate 240
square mile drainage basin, and eventually flows into southern Hood
Canal, an arm of Puget Sound. The river flows out of three sub-basins
(South Fork, North Fork, and Vance Creek) into a broad, flat alluvial
plain known as the Skokomish River Valley. The Skokomish Indian
Reservation is located within the lower valley and extends along the
southeast portion of the Olympic Peninsula. The Basin is defined by the
Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 16 and is located within U.S.
Congressional District 6 of Washington State.
2. Alternatives: The EIS will separately evaluate alternatives for
aquatic ecosystem restoration and flood risk management. Alternatives
that will be evaluated under aquatic ecosystem restoration will include
an alternative that uses physical actions to restore the Basin's
habitat-forming processes and/or create habitats that have been lost as
a result of historic alterations. Example of actions that could occur
under this alternative include: increasing floodplain habitat and
connectivity, restoring off-channel habitat for juvenile fish,
improving estuarine functions and processes, and increasing emergent
and riparian vegetation. Another alternative that will be considered
will focus on benefits to the several aquatic species listed under the
Endangered Species Act. Actions under this alternative could include
creation of spawning and
[[Page 58373]]
rearing areas, and additional fish supplementation. The no action
alternative will also be evaluated.
Alternatives for flood risk management include evaluation of the
current levee system. Actions under this alternative may include
setback levees to improve flood containment. Another alternative would
study the effects of sediment removal and actions could include:
sediment traps, dredging and selective gravel removal. Another
alternative would focus on nonstructural actions such as flood proofing
and education. The no action alternative will also be evaluated.
These alternatives are not final and may change and/or new
alternatives may develop during the scoping and NEPA process. A range
of ecosystem restoration and flood risk management actions will be
investigated and more than one option may be included in the preferred
alternative. Additionally, a number of potential ecosystem restoration
actions could meet ancillary flood risk management goals.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement: This notice of intent formally
commences the scoping process under NEPA. As part of the scoping
process, all affected Federal, state, and local agencies, Native
American tribes, interested private organizations, including
environmental interest groups and the general public are invited to
comment on the scope of the draft FR/EIS. Comments are requested
concerning problems in the basin, possible project alternatives,
mitigation measures, probable significant environmental impacts, and
permits or other approvals that may be required. The environmental
review process will be comprehensive and will satisfy the requirements
of NEPA and other relevant Federal, state, and local environmental
laws. The public scoping period will occur over a 30-day period to
commence on September 24, 2010 and will extend through October 25,
2010. The Draft FR/EIS is expected to be available in November of 2011.
4. Scoping Meeting: One public scoping meeting will be held on
October 7, 2010 to identify issues of major concern and obtain public
input on the range and acceptability of alternatives. This meeting will
be held at Mason County Public Works, 100 West Public Works Drive,
Shelton, Washington, 98584. An informal open house will be held between
4 and 5:30 p.m. A presentation to summarize the purpose of scoping and
existing information will be made between 5:30 and 6 p.m. Then, verbal
testimony (maximum 4 minutes) will be taken between 6 and 7 p.m.
Written comments may be sent by regular or electronic mail to EIS
Scoping Comments c/o Patrick Cagney (see ADDRESSES). Ongoing
communication with agencies, Native American tribes, public interest
groups, and interested citizens will take place throughout the EIS
development through the use of public meetings, mailings and the
Internet. Additional meetings will be scheduled upon completion of the
draft EIS.
Anthony Wright,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Commander.
[FR Doc. 2010-23946 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P