Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 57960-57961 [2010-23872]

Download as PDF 57960 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices Information will also be collected from a comparison group of 700 respondents who will complete pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, but will not participate in the discussion groups or review the briefing materials. obesity prevention. OMB approval is requested for one year. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 2,034. The goal is to identify key issues for community obesity prevention programs, to refine promising obesity prevention practices for targeted communities, and to facilitate the dissemination of promising practices for ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Form name General Public .................................... Discussion Group Moderator’s Guide Discussion Group Confirmation and Instructions. Briefing Materials ................................ On-Line Questionnaire: Deliberative Poll on Obesity Prevention and Control. Dated: September 15, 2010. Carol Walker, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–23758 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30-Day–10–0783] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Type of respondents Average burden per response (in hours) 250 250 Background and Brief Description Safe Dates, a dating violence prevention curriculum for 8th and 9th grade students, has been shown to be effective at preventing victimization and perpetration of teen dating violence in one rural North Carolina school district, but appropriateness of the program with urban, high-risk adolescents is unknown. CDC has learned additional information about violence and risk factors for adolescents in urban, highrisk communities since the original OMB clearance package was submitted. Recent research also has shown that adolescents who live in urban, disadvantaged communities report significantly higher prevalence of some risky behaviors, including violence, than nationally representative U.S. adolescents (Swahn & Bossarte, 2009). To assess whether Safe Dates should be modified for urban, high-risk adolescents, CDC requests OMB approval to conduct focus groups with 1 10/60 250 950 Proposed Project Evaluation of Safe Dates Project— (OMB No. 0920–0783 exp. 6/30/2011)— Revision—National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 4 1 1 2 10/60 30/60 students and interviews with teachers at urban schools in the 2010–2011 school year. Data collection staff will use new interview guides designed for this purpose. The data collection will require participation from teachers at eight schools who delivered the Safe Dates program and students at one school who received the program. Qualitative data will be collected through student focus groups and teacher interviews. Students will complete a participant profile form to capture basic demographic information. Approximately 40 students at one school will participate in focus groups. Two focus groups will consist of 8–10 boys, and two focus groups will include 8–10 girls. Informed written consent from parents for each student’s participation and informed written assent from tenth graders for their own participation will be obtained. Twenty teachers will participate in interviews. Students and teachers will be asked about their experiences with the Safe Dates program and ideas they may have about adapting the program for urban schools. There is no cost to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annual burden hours are 14,193. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS No. of respondents srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Type of respondent Form name Student ............................................................ Student Effectiveness Baseline Survey ......... 1st Student mid-implementation survey ......... 2nd Student mid-implementation survey ....... Student Effectiveness Follow-up Survey ....... Baseline principal survey ............................... Mid-implementation principal survey .............. End-of-school-year principal survey ............... Principal .......................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Sep 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10,158 3,612 3,612 8,126 49 32 49 E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1 Average burden per response (in hours) No. of responses per respondent 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 35/60 25/60 25/60 35/60 15/60 15/60 15/60 57961 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued Form name Student ............................................................ (new instrument) ............................................. Prevention coordinator .................................... Student Focus Group Guide (student demographic data and focus group questions). Baseline prevention coordinator survey ......... Mid-implementation prevention coordinator survey. End-of-school-year prevention coordinator survey. Follow-up prevention coordinator survey ....... Baseline teacher survey ................................. Teacher Cost survey ...................................... Fifth session mid-implementation survey ....... Ninth session mid-implementation survey ..... Teacher Interview Guide ................................ Teacher ........................................................... Teacher (new instrument) ............................... Dated: September 17, 2010. Maryam I. Daneshvar, Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–23872 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Title: Division of Unaccompanied Children’s Services (DUCS) Request for Specific Consent. OMB No.: New Collection. Description: The William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA of Average burden per response (in hours) No. of responses per respondent No. of respondents Type of respondent 40 1 1.5 49 32 1 1 15/60 15/60 49 1 15/60 49 98 49 98 98 20 1 1 11 2 2 1 5/60 15/60 20/60 25/60 25/60 1 information, basic identifying information on the unaccompanied alien child, the name of the HHS-funded facility where the child is in HHS custody and care, the name of the court and its location, and the kind of request (e.g., for a change in custody, etc.). The form also asks that the unaccompanied alien child’s attorney or authorized representative attach a Notice of Representation, which is an approved federal government agency form used for immigration procedures that authorizes the attorney to act on behalf of the child (i.e., G–28, EOIR–28, EOIR– 29), or any other form of authorization to act on behalf of the unaccompanied alien child. Respondents: Attorneys, accredited legal representatives, or others authorized to act on behalf of a unaccompanied alien child. 2008), Public Law 110–457 was enacted into law December 23, 2008. Section 235(d) directs the Secretary of HHS to grant or deny requests for specific consent for unaccompanied alien children in HHS custody who seek to invoke the jurisdiction of a state court for a dependency order and who also seek to invoke the jurisdiction of a state court to determine or alter his or her custody status or release from ORR. These requests can be extremely time sensitive since a child must ask a state court for dependency before turning 18 years old. In developing procedures for collecting the necessary information from unaccompanied alien children, their attorneys, or other representatives to allow HHS to approve or deny consent requests, ORR/DUCS devised a form. Specifically, the form asks the requestor for his/her identifying ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES Instrument Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden hours per response Total burden hours ORR–0132 ....................................................................................... 72 1 0.33 23.76 ............................ ............................ ............................ 23.76 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours ..................................... Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. OMB Comment: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Sep 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–7285, E-mail: PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 OIRA_SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: September 20, 2010. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2010–23782 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57960-57961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30-Day-10-0783]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a 
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call 
the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-5960 or send an e-mail 
to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395-5806. 
Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Evaluation of Safe Dates Project--(OMB No. 0920-0783 exp. 6/30/
2011)--Revision--National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 
(NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    Safe Dates, a dating violence prevention curriculum for 8th and 9th 
grade students, has been shown to be effective at preventing 
victimization and perpetration of teen dating violence in one rural 
North Carolina school district, but appropriateness of the program with 
urban, high-risk adolescents is unknown. CDC has learned additional 
information about violence and risk factors for adolescents in urban, 
high-risk communities since the original OMB clearance package was 
submitted. Recent research also has shown that adolescents who live in 
urban, disadvantaged communities report significantly higher prevalence 
of some risky behaviors, including violence, than nationally 
representative U.S. adolescents (Swahn & Bossarte, 2009). To assess 
whether Safe Dates should be modified for urban, high-risk adolescents, 
CDC requests OMB approval to conduct focus groups with students and 
interviews with teachers at urban schools in the 2010-2011 school year. 
Data collection staff will use new interview guides designed for this 
purpose. The data collection will require participation from teachers 
at eight schools who delivered the Safe Dates program and students at 
one school who received the program. Qualitative data will be collected 
through student focus groups and teacher interviews. Students will 
complete a participant profile form to capture basic demographic 
information. Approximately 40 students at one school will participate 
in focus groups. Two focus groups will consist of 8-10 boys, and two 
focus groups will include 8-10 girls. Informed written consent from 
parents for each student's participation and informed written assent 
from tenth graders for their own participation will be obtained. Twenty 
teachers will participate in interviews. Students and teachers will be 
asked about their experiences with the Safe Dates program and ideas 
they may have about adapting the program for urban schools.
    There is no cost to respondents other than their time. The total 
estimated annual burden hours are 14,193.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      No. of      Average burden
         Type of respondent                   Form name               No. of       responses per   per  response
                                                                    respondents     respondent      (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student............................  Student Effectiveness                10,158               1           35/60
                                      Baseline Survey.
                                     1st Student mid-                      3,612               1           25/60
                                      implementation survey.
                                     2nd Student mid-                      3,612               1           25/60
                                      implementation survey.
                                     Student Effectiveness                 8,126               1           35/60
                                      Follow-up Survey.
Principal..........................  Baseline principal survey..              49               1           15/60
                                     Mid-implementation                       32               1           15/60
                                      principal survey.
                                     End-of-school-year                       49               1           15/60
                                      principal survey.

[[Page 57961]]

 
Student............................  Student Focus Group Guide                40               1             1.5
(new instrument)...................   (student demographic data
                                      and focus group questions).
Prevention coordinator.............  Baseline prevention                      49               1           15/60
                                      coordinator survey.
                                     Mid-implementation                       32               1           15/60
                                      prevention coordinator
                                      survey.
                                     End-of-school-year                       49               1           15/60
                                      prevention coordinator
                                      survey.
                                     Follow-up prevention                     49               1            5/60
                                      coordinator survey.
Teacher............................  Baseline teacher survey....              98               1           15/60
                                     Teacher Cost survey........              49              11           20/60
                                     Fifth session mid-                       98               2           25/60
                                      implementation survey.
                                     Ninth session mid-                       98               2           25/60
                                      implementation survey.
Teacher (new instrument)...........  Teacher Interview Guide....              20               1               1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: September 17, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-23872 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.