New Postal Product, 57995-57996 [2010-23851]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices
of International Return Receipts similar
to what is being proposed for domestic
Return Receipts.
The Public Representative concurs
that International Return Receipts
(inbound and outbound) is dependent
upon foreign postal operators and thus,
defies meaningful measurement within
the meaning of 39 CFR 3055.3(a)(2).
Public Representative Comments at 12.
The Commission finds that
International Return Receipts (inbound
and outbound) is partly dependent upon
foreign postal operators, which makes it
difficult to design a meaningful
performance measurement and
reporting system. Because of this, it falls
within the parameters of 39 CFR
3055.3(a)(2) for an exception from
performance measurement reporting.
The request for a semi–permanent
exception from reporting is granted.
14. International Reply Coupons
The Postal Service explains that
International Reply Coupon (inbound
and outbound) service allows a sender
to prepay a reply mailpiece by
purchasing reply coupons that are
exchangeable for local postage stamps
by postal administrators in member
countries of the Universal Postal Union.
Request at 24–25. It contends that
because the transaction is complete at
the time of purchase, and because no
additional service is required, it is
difficult to conceive of a meaningful
system to define or measure service
performance for this product. Id. at 24.
The Public Representative concurs
that International Reply Coupons
(outbound and inbound) is a
transaction–based service which defies
meaningful measurement within the
meaning of 39 CFR 3055.3(a)(2). Public
Representative Comments at 11.
The Commission finds that
International Reply Coupon (inbound
and outbound) service is a transactionbased service which falls within the
parameters of 39 CFR 3055.3(a)(2) for an
exception from performance
measurement reporting. The request for
a semi–permanent exception from
reporting is granted.
E. Market Dominant Negotiated
Service Agreements
Three market dominant negotiated
service agreement products are
currently active:
• The Bradford Group Negotiated
Service Agreement;
• Life Line Screening Negotiated
Service Agreement; and
• Canada Post–United States Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement
for Inbound Market Dominant Services.
The Postal Service asserts that the
mail tendered under each negotiated
service agreement already is included in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Sep 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
the measurement of other products:
Standard Mail Letters for The Bradford
Group; Standard Mail Letters and Flats
for Life Line Screening; and Inbound
Single–Piece First–Class Mail
International for Canada Post. It requests
that all three agreements be excluded
from reporting based upon the
parameters of 39 CFR 3055.3(a)(3), ‘‘[t]he
product, or component of a product, is
in the form of a negotiated service
agreement with substantially all
components of the agreement included
in the measurement of other products.’’
Request at 25.
The Public Representative concurs
that the semi–permanent exceptions for
the three negotiated service agreements
are justified under 39 CFR 3055.3(a)(3).
Public Representative Comments at 10–
11.
The Commission finds that the listed
negotiated service agreements fall
within the parameters of 39 CFR
3055.3(a)(3) for exceptions from
performance measurement reporting.
The requests for semi–permanent
exceptions from reporting are granted.
V. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Postal Service products, or
components of products, listed
following the signature page of this
order are granted an exception from
annual and periodic reporting of service
performance achievements under 39
CFR part 3055, subparts A and B,
pursuant to 39 CFR 3055.3. All other
requests for exceptions are hereby
denied.
2. The deadline for the Postal Service
to file a request for waivers, originally
established in Order No. 465, shall be
extended until October 1, 2010.
3. The Motion for Leave to File
Response to Comments of the Public
Representative, filed August 12, 2010, is
granted.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
Appendix
The following products, or components of
products, are granted an exception from
annual and periodic reporting of service
performance achievements under 39 CFR
part 3055, subparts A and B, pursuant to 39
CFR 3055.3.
Special Services (the following listed products only)
Ancillary Services (the following listed
components of the product only):
Address Correction Service (hard–copy)
Business Reply Mail
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57995
Bulk Parcel Return
Certificate of Mailing
Merchandise Return
Parcel Airlift (PAL)
Restricted Delivery
Shipper Paid Forwarding
Special Handling
Stamped Envelopes
Stamped Cards
Premium Stamped Stationary
Premium Stamped Cards
International Ancillary Services (the following listed components of the product
only)
Internatonal Certificate of Mailing
International Registered Mail (outbound
only)
International Return Receipt
International Restricted Delivery
International Insurance (with Inbound
Surface Parcel Post (at UPU Rates))
Customs Clearance and Delivery Fee
Caller Service
Change of Address Credit Card Authentication
International Reply Coupon Service
International Business Reply Mail Service
Money Orders (sales aspect of this service
only)
Negotiated Service Agreements (the following listed products only):
The Bradford Group Negotiated Service
Agreement
Life Line Screening Negotiated Service
Agreement
Canada Post–United States Postal Service
Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Market Dominant Services
[FR Doc. 2010–23788 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010–116, CP2010–117, and
CP2010–118; Order No. 541]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently–filed Postal Service request to
add three Global Expedited Package
Services 3 contracts to the competitive
product list. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with this
filing.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
57996
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On September 16, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice announcing that it
has entered into three additional Global
Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3)
contracts.1 The Postal Service believes
the instant contracts are functionally
equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and are supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice explains that
Order No. 86, which established GEPS
1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290,
the Commission approved the GEPS 2
product.2 In Order No. 503, the
Commission approved the GEPS 3
product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in
Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the
baseline contract for future functional
equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3
product.
The instant contracts. The Postal
Service filed the instant contracts
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that each
contract is in accordance with Order No.
86. The term of each contract is one year
from the date the Postal Service notifies
the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3. In support of its
Notice, the Postal Service filed four
attachments as follows:
Attachment 1A, 1B and 1C—redacted
copies of the three contracts and
applicable annexes;
Attachment 2A, 2B and 2C—certified
statements required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which
establishes prices and classifications for
GEPS contracts, a description of
applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis of the formulas, and
certification of the Governors’ vote; and
Attachment 4—an application for
non–public treatment of materials to
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
Three Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements
and Application For Non-Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, September 16, 2010
(Notice).
2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Sep 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for the GEPS product. The Postal
Service identifies customer–specific
information and general contract terms
that distinguish the instant contracts
from the baseline GEPS 3 agreement. Id.
at 4–5. It states that the differences,
which include price variations based on
updated costing information and
volume commitments, do not alter the
contracts’ functional equivalency. Id. at
4. The Postal Service asserts that
‘‘[b]ecause the agreements incorporate
the same cost attributes and
methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these three GEPS
contracts are similar, if not the same, as
the relevant characteristics of previously
filed contracts.’’ Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its
filings demonstrate that each of the new
GEPS 3 contracts complies with the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests
that the instant contracts be included
within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–116, CP2010–117 and
CP2010–118 for consideration of matters
related to the contracts identified in the
Postal Service’s Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a
consolidated basis for purposes of this
order. Filings with respect to a
particular contract should be filed in
that docket.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s contracts are consistent with
the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642. Comments are due no later than
September 24, 2010. The public
portions of these filings can be accessed
via the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned
proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–116, CP2010–117 and
CP2010–118 for consideration of matters
raised by the Postal Service’s Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
September 24, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as the
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–23851 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting
Notice is hereby given that the
Railroad Retirement Board will hold a
meeting on September 29, 2010, 10 a.m.
at the Board’s meeting room on the 8th
floor of its headquarters building, 844
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois
60611. The agenda for this meeting
follows:
(1) Executive Committee Reports
The entire meeting will be open to the
public. The person to contact for more
information is Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312–
751–4920.
Dated: September 20, 2010.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–23909 Filed 9–21–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #12258 and #12259]
Iowa Disaster Number IA–00026
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 4.
AGENCY:
This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of Iowa (FEMA–1930–DR),
dated 07/29/2010.
Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding,
and Tornadoes.
Incident Period: 06/01/2010 through
08/31/2010.
DATES: Effective Date: 08/31/2010.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 09/27/2010.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 04/29/2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57995-57996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010-116, CP2010-117, and CP2010-118; Order No. 541]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to add three Global Expedited Package Services 3 contracts to
the competitive product list. This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with this filing.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should contact the person identified
in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on
alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 57996]]
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On September 16, 2010, the Postal Service filed a notice announcing
that it has entered into three additional Global Expedited Package
Services 3 (GEPS 3) contracts.\1\ The Postal Service believes the
instant contracts are functionally equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and are supported by Governors' Decision No. 08-7,
attached to the Notice and originally filed in Docket No. CP2008-4. Id.
at 1, Attachment 3. The Notice explains that Order No. 86, which
established GEPS 1 as a product, also authorized functionally
equivalent agreements to be included within the product, provided that
they meet the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No.
290, the Commission approved the GEPS 2 product.\2\ In Order No. 503,
the Commission approved the GEPS 3 product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in Docket No. CP2010-71 serve as
the baseline contract for future functional equivalence analyses of the
GEPS 3 product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing Three
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package Services 3
Negotiated Service Agreements and Application For Non-Public
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, September 16, 2010
(Notice).
\2\ Docket No. CP2009-50, Order Granting Clarification and
Adding Global Expedited Package Services 2 to the Competitive
Product List, August 28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The instant contracts. The Postal Service filed the instant
contracts pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, the Postal Service
contends that each contract is in accordance with Order No. 86. The
term of each contract is one year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3. In support of its Notice, the Postal Service
filed four attachments as follows:
Attachment 1A, 1B and 1C--redacted copies of the three contracts
and applicable annexes;
Attachment 2A, 2B and 2C--certified statements required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
Attachment 3--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No. 08-7 which
establishes prices and classifications for GEPS contracts, a
description of applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for prices, an
analysis of the formulas, and certification of the Governors' vote; and
Attachment 4--an application for non-public treatment of materials
to maintain redacted portions of the contract and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the instant GEPS 3 contracts fit
within the Mail Classification Schedule language for the GEPS product.
The Postal Service identifies customer-specific information and general
contract terms that distinguish the instant contracts from the baseline
GEPS 3 agreement. Id. at 4-5. It states that the differences, which
include price variations based on updated costing information and
volume commitments, do not alter the contracts' functional equivalency.
Id. at 4. The Postal Service asserts that ``[b]ecause the agreements
incorporate the same cost attributes and methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these three GEPS contracts are similar, if not the
same, as the relevant characteristics of previously filed contracts.''
Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its filings demonstrate that each
of the new GEPS 3 contracts complies with the requirements of 39 U.S.C.
3633 and is functionally equivalent to the baseline GEPS 3 contract.
Therefore, it requests that the instant contracts be included within
the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-116, CP2010-117 and
CP2010-118 for consideration of matters related to the contracts
identified in the Postal Service's Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for purposes of
this order. Filings with respect to a particular contract should be
filed in that docket.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's contracts are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642. Comments are due no later than September 24, 2010. The
public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's
Web site (http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-116, CP2010-117
and CP2010-118 for consideration of matters raised by the Postal
Service's Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than September 24, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as the officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23851 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S