Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe Bay Air Show, Oahu, HI, 57857-57859 [2010-23768]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
1976. U.S. Department of Labor. August
11, 1993. 229 pages.
MSHA. 1982. Report of Investigation
Underground Coal Mine Dust Explosion.
No. 11 Mine ID No. 15–02290, Adkins
Coal Company, Kite, Knott County,
Kentucky. December 7, 1981. U.S.
Department of Labor. 60 Pages.
MSHA. 1982. Report of Investigation
Underground Coal Mine Dust Explosion.
No. 1 Mine ID No. 15–12624, RFH Coal
Company, Craynor, Floyd County,
Kentucky. January 20, 1982. U.S.
Department of Labor, 53 pages.
MSHA. 1993. Report of Investigation
Underground Coal Mine Explosion. #3
Mine ID No. 44–06594, Southmountain
Coal Co., Inc, Norton, Wise County,
Virginia. December 7, 1992. U.S.
Department of Labor. May 6, 1993. 67
Pages.
MSHA. 1995. Report of Investigation
Underground Coal Mine Explosion. No.
9 Mine ID No. 15–16418, Day Branch
Coal Company, Inc., Pathfork, Harlan
County, Kentucky. May 11, 1994. U.S.
Department of Labor, May 26, 1995. 49
Pages.
MSHA. 2001. Report of Investigation Fatal
Underground Coal Mine Explosions. No.
5 Mine Jim Walter Resources, Inc. Brook
Wood, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, ID
NO. 01–01322. U.S. Department of
Labor, December 11, 2002. 125 Pages.
NIOSH. 2009. Recent Coal Dust Particle Size
Surveys and the Implications for Mine
Explosions. (74 FR 42317) August 21,
2009.
Sunstein C. 2004. Valuing Life: A Plea for
Disaggregation. Duke Law Journal, 54
(November 2004): 385–445.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2010).
National Income and Product Accounts
Table: Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price
Deflators for Gross Domestic Product
[Index numbers, 2005=100]. Revised
May 27, 2010. https://www.bea.gov/
national/nipaweb/TableView.asp?
SelectedTable=13&Freq=Qtr&First
Year=2006&LastYear=2008.
Viscusi, W. & Aldy, J (2003) ‘‘The Value of
a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of
Market Estimates Throughout the
World’’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
(27:5–76).
X. Emergency Temporary Standard—
Regulatory Text
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 75
Mine safety and health, Underground
coal mines, Combustible materials and
rock dusting.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety
and Health.
Chapter I of Title 30, part 75 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
■
PART 75—SAFETY STANDARDS FOR
UNDERGROUND COAL MINES
1. The authority citation for part 75
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Sep 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811, 864.
■
§ 75.403 Maintenance of incombustible
content of rock dust.
Where rock dust is required to be
applied, it shall be distributed upon the
top, floor, and sides of all underground
areas of a coal mine and maintained in
such quantities that the incombustible
content of the combined coal dust, rock
dust, and other dust shall be not less
than 80 percent. Where methane is
present in any ventilating current, the
percent of incombustible content of
such combined dust shall be increased
0.4 percent for each 0.1 percent of
methane.
[FR Doc. 2010–23789 Filed 9–21–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0705]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe
Bay Air Show, Oahu, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing two temporary safety zones
while the U.S. Navy Blue Angels
Squadron conducts aerobatic
performances over Kaneohe Bay, Oahu,
Hawaii. These safety zones are
necessary to protect watercraft and the
general public from hazards associated
with the U.S. Navy Blue Angels aircraft
low flying, high powered jet aerobatics
over open waters.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
on September 24, 2010, through 7 p.m.
on September 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0705 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0705 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander Marcella Granquist,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone
808–842–2600, e-mail
Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2. Revise § 75.403 to read as follows:
ACTION:
57857
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On August 18, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled: Safety Zone; Blue Angels at
Kaneohe Bay Air Show, Oahu, HI in the
Federal Register (75 FR 159). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because the duration to
complete meetings with local
stakeholders, required before a safety
zone could be designated, did not afford
the time needed before the rulemaking
process could be completed to protect
watercraft and the general public from
hazards associated with the U.S. Navy
Blue Angels aerial aerobatics.
Basis and Purpose
On July 20, 2010, Kaneohe Bay Air
Show 2010 coordinators informed the
U.S. Coast Guard of a State of Hawaii
approved Air Show plan that include an
aerial performance ‘‘show box’’
extending beyond the Kaneohe Bay
Naval Defensive Sea Area (NDSA) as
established by Executive Order No. 8681
of February 14, 1941. Within this ‘‘show
box’’, the U.S. Navy Blue Angels
Squadron will conduct aerobatic
performances, exhibiting their aircraft’s
maximum performance capabilities,
over Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii during
a 3-day period. Taking into account the
hazards associated within this ‘‘show
box’’ during the Squadron’s high
powered, multiple jet aircraft
performances, and that Kaneohe Bay
normally experiences heavy waterway
traffic during weekends, two safety
zones for the portions of the ‘‘show box’’
that extend beyond the Kaneohe Bay
NDSA was determined to be appropriate
by the Captain of the Port so as to
ensure the safety of all watercraft and
the general public during the
performances.
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
57858
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion of Comments and Changes
As planning for the event developed,
it was suggested that the best course of
action would be to modify the
temporary safety zones, by moving the
‘‘show box’’ northeast, to ensure
channels within Kaneohe Bay remained
open during the Blue Angels’
performance. The Coast Guard believes
that the slightly modified area is better
suited to accommodating the needs of
the air show and safeguarding the
public. Consequently, the two safety
zones were moved slightly but remain
intact to cover the areas of the required
‘‘show box’’ that fall outside of the
NDSA. The coordinates for the two
temporary safety zones are now as
follows: (1) Southwest of Mokapu
Peninsula: The NDSA extending from
21°26.449 N, 157°47.071 W then
Southeast to 21°26.270 N, 157°46.895 W
then Northwest at a bearing of 51° True
to the NDSA. (2) North of Mokapu
Peninsula: The NDSA extending
Northeast to position 21°27.943 N,
157°44.953 W then Southeast to
21°28.251 N, 157°44.880 W then South
at a bearing of 239° True to the NDSA.
Even with the modifications, we note
that transit through Kaneohe Bay, the
Sampan Channel and Kaneohe Bay
Entrance Channel will remain open.
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While the temporary safety zones are
being enforced, watercraft will be able
to transit freely around the zones.
Furthermore, watercraft will be allowed
to transit through the temporary safety
zones if permission to enter is granted
by the Honolulu Captain of the Port.
Before the effective period, we will
issue daily maritime advisories and
widely available to users of the area
including VHF Channel 16.
Assistance for Small Entities
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters within the two temporary
safety zones, the effect of this rule will
not be significant because watercraft
will be able to transit around without
restriction. Furthermore, watercraft will
be able to transit through the safety
zones with permission from the
Honolulu Captain of the Port.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Sep 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
■
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of two
temporary safety zones for daily
offshore Blue Angels performances
permitted as a marine event. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is amending
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Sep 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
2. Add § 165.T14–210 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T14–210 Safety Zone; Blue Angels at
Kaneohe Bay Air Show, Oahu, Hawaii.
(a) Location. The following areas,
consisting of all waters contained
within an area of one box on the
southwest side and one box on the north
side of the Kaneohe Bay Naval
Defensive Sea Area (NDSA) as
established by Executive Order No. 8681
of February 14, 1941, in Kaneohe Bay,
Oahu, Hawaii, are temporary safety
zones. This safety zone extends from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor.
These coordinates are based upon the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Coast Survey, Pacific
Ocean, Oahu, Hawaii, chart 19359.
(1) Southwest of Mokapu Peninsula:
The NDSA extending from 21°26.449 N,
157°47.071 W then Southeast to
21°26.270 N, 157°46.895 W then
Northwest at a bearing of 51°True to the
NDSA.
(2) North of Mokapu Peninsula: The
NDSA extending Northeast to position
21°27.943 N, 157°44.953 W then
Southeast to 21°28.251 N, 157°44.880 W
then South at a bearing of 239° True to
the NDSA.
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or
remaining in the temporary safety zones
described in paragraph (a) of this
section is prohibited unless authorized
by the Honolulu Coast Guard Captain of
the Port.
(2) Persons desiring to transit in the
safety zones may contact the Honolulu
Captain of the Port on VHF channel 16
(156.800 MHz), or at telephone numbers
808–842–2600 or 808–563–9906 to seek
permission to transit the area. If
permission is granted, all persons and
watercraft must comply with the
instructions of the Honolulu Captain of
the Port or her designated
representative.
(c) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 9 a.m. local (HST) time
September 24, 2010, through 7 p.m.
local (HST) time September 26, 2010.
This rule will be enforced daily between
the hours of 9 a.m. local (HST) time to
7 p.m. local (HST) time during
September 24–26, 2010.
(d) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in either zone except for
support vessels/aircraft and support
personnel, or other watercraft
authorized by the Honolulu Captain of
the Port or her designated
representatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57859
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule would be subject to
the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232
and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: September 8, 2010.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2010–23768 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AN21
Specially Adapted Housing and
Special Home Adaptation
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as a final rule its
proposal to amend its adjudication
regulations regarding specially adapted
housing and special home adaptation
grants. This final rule incorporates
certain provisions from the Veterans
Benefits Act of 2003, the Veterans
Benefits Improvement Act of 2004, the
Veterans’ Housing Opportunity and
Benefits Improvement Act of 2006, and
the Housing and Economic Recovery
Act of 2008. These amendments are
necessary to conform the regulations to
the statutory provisions.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 25, 2010. Please refer to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
detailed information regarding the
applicability dates of this final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Kniffen, Chief, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9739.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.)
SUMMARY:
In a
document published in the Federal
Register on December 18, 2009, (74 FR
67145), VA proposed to amend its
regulations pertaining to eligibility for
specially adapted housing (SAH) grants
and special home adaptation (SHA)
grants. The public comment period
ended on February 16, 2010, and VA
received no comments. Therefore, VA is
adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule. However, we are making one
change from the proposed rule. We are
inserting ‘‘rated as permanent and total’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57857-57859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23768]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0705]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe Bay Air Show, Oahu, HI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones
while the U.S. Navy Blue Angels Squadron conducts aerobatic
performances over Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. These safety zones are
necessary to protect watercraft and the general public from hazards
associated with the U.S. Navy Blue Angels aircraft low flying, high
powered jet aerobatics over open waters.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. on September 24, 2010,
through 7 p.m. on September 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0705 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0705 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander Marcella Granquist,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu,
telephone 808-842-2600, e-mail Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On August 18, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled: Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe Bay Air Show,
Oahu, HI in the Federal Register (75 FR 159). We received no comments
on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was
held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because the duration to complete
meetings with local stakeholders, required before a safety zone could
be designated, did not afford the time needed before the rulemaking
process could be completed to protect watercraft and the general public
from hazards associated with the U.S. Navy Blue Angels aerial
aerobatics.
Basis and Purpose
On July 20, 2010, Kaneohe Bay Air Show 2010 coordinators informed
the U.S. Coast Guard of a State of Hawaii approved Air Show plan that
include an aerial performance ``show box'' extending beyond the Kaneohe
Bay Naval Defensive Sea Area (NDSA) as established by Executive Order
No. 8681 of February 14, 1941. Within this ``show box'', the U.S. Navy
Blue Angels Squadron will conduct aerobatic performances, exhibiting
their aircraft's maximum performance capabilities, over Kaneohe Bay,
Oahu, Hawaii during a 3-day period. Taking into account the hazards
associated within this ``show box'' during the Squadron's high powered,
multiple jet aircraft performances, and that Kaneohe Bay normally
experiences heavy waterway traffic during weekends, two safety zones
for the portions of the ``show box'' that extend beyond the Kaneohe Bay
NDSA was determined to be appropriate by the Captain of the Port so as
to ensure the safety of all watercraft and the general public during
the performances.
[[Page 57858]]
Discussion of Comments and Changes
As planning for the event developed, it was suggested that the best
course of action would be to modify the temporary safety zones, by
moving the ``show box'' northeast, to ensure channels within Kaneohe
Bay remained open during the Blue Angels' performance. The Coast Guard
believes that the slightly modified area is better suited to
accommodating the needs of the air show and safeguarding the public.
Consequently, the two safety zones were moved slightly but remain
intact to cover the areas of the required ``show box'' that fall
outside of the NDSA. The coordinates for the two temporary safety zones
are now as follows: (1) Southwest of Mokapu Peninsula: The NDSA
extending from 21[deg]26.449 N, 157[deg]47.071 W then Southeast to
21[deg]26.270 N, 157[deg]46.895 W then Northwest at a bearing of
51[deg] True to the NDSA. (2) North of Mokapu Peninsula: The NDSA
extending Northeast to position 21[deg]27.943 N, 157[deg]44.953 W then
Southeast to 21[deg]28.251 N, 157[deg]44.880 W then South at a bearing
of 239[deg] True to the NDSA. Even with the modifications, we note that
transit through Kaneohe Bay, the Sampan Channel and Kaneohe Bay
Entrance Channel will remain open.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters within the two
temporary safety zones, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because watercraft will be able to transit around without restriction.
Furthermore, watercraft will be able to transit through the safety
zones with permission from the Honolulu Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. While the temporary safety zones are being enforced,
watercraft will be able to transit freely around the zones.
Furthermore, watercraft will be allowed to transit through the
temporary safety zones if permission to enter is granted by the
Honolulu Captain of the Port. Before the effective period, we will
issue daily maritime advisories and widely available to users of the
area including VHF Channel 16.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not
[[Page 57859]]
require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of
two temporary safety zones for daily offshore Blue Angels performances
permitted as a marine event. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is amending
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-210 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T14-210 Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe Bay Air Show,
Oahu, Hawaii.
(a) Location. The following areas, consisting of all waters
contained within an area of one box on the southwest side and one box
on the north side of the Kaneohe Bay Naval Defensive Sea Area (NDSA) as
established by Executive Order No. 8681 of February 14, 1941, in
Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii, are temporary safety zones. This safety zone
extends from the surface of the water to the ocean floor. These
coordinates are based upon the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Coast Survey, Pacific Ocean, Oahu, Hawaii, chart 19359.
(1) Southwest of Mokapu Peninsula: The NDSA extending from
21[deg]26.449 N, 157[deg]47.071 W then Southeast to 21[deg]26.270 N,
157[deg]46.895 W then Northwest at a bearing of 51[deg]True to the
NDSA.
(2) North of Mokapu Peninsula: The NDSA extending Northeast to
position 21[deg]27.943 N, 157[deg]44.953 W then Southeast to
21[deg]28.251 N, 157[deg]44.880 W then South at a bearing of 239[deg]
True to the NDSA.
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or remaining in the temporary
safety zones described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the Honolulu Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
(2) Persons desiring to transit in the safety zones may contact the
Honolulu Captain of the Port on VHF channel 16 (156.800 MHz), or at
telephone numbers 808-842-2600 or 808-563-9906 to seek permission to
transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and watercraft
must comply with the instructions of the Honolulu Captain of the Port
or her designated representative.
(c) Effective period. This rule is effective from 9 a.m. local
(HST) time September 24, 2010, through 7 p.m. local (HST) time
September 26, 2010. This rule will be enforced daily between the hours
of 9 a.m. local (HST) time to 7 p.m. local (HST) time during September
24-26, 2010.
(d) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
either zone except for support vessels/aircraft and support personnel,
or other watercraft authorized by the Honolulu Captain of the Port or
her designated representatives.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule would be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: September 8, 2010.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2010-23768 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P