Proposed Supplementary Rules on Public Land, Idaho, 57813-57815 [2010-23719]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID9900000.L1210000.NU0000; G0–00]
Proposed Supplementary Rules on
Public Land, Idaho
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rules.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Idaho State Office is
proposing supplementary rules relating
to the illegal use of alcohol and drugs
on public lands in Idaho. The BLM is
also proposing to prohibit the
possession of an open alcoholic
beverage container by operators or
passengers in or on either a vehicle or
off-highway vehicle, on public land in
Idaho administered by the BLM. These
supplementary rules are necessary to
protect natural resources and the health
and safety of public land users. These
supplementary rules will allow BLM
Law Enforcement personnel to continue
enforcing existing public land
regulations pertaining to alcohol and
drug use in a manner consistent with
current State of Idaho Statutes.
DATES: You should submit your
comments by November 22, 2010.
Comments postmarked or received in
person or by electronic mail after this
date may not be considered in the
development of the final supplementary
rules.
ADDRESSES: Please mail or hand-deliver
comments to Keith McGrath, State Staff
Law Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of
Land Management, Idaho State Office,
1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho
83709; or e-mail comments to
Keith_McGrath@blm.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith McGrath, Bureau of Land
Management, (208) 373–4046,
Keith_McGrath@blm.gov. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may contact this individual
by calling the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339, 24
hours a day, 7 days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
III. Other Procedural Matters
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments on the proposed
supplementary rules should be specific
and confined to issues pertinent to the
proposed rule, and should explain the
reason for any recommended change.
Where possible, comments should
reference the specific section or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
paragraph of the proposal that the
commenter is addressing. The BLM is
not obligated to consider, or include in
the Administrative Record for the final
supplementary rules, comments
delivered to an address other than those
listed above (See ADDRESSES) or
comments that the BLM receives after
the close of the comment period (See
DATES), unless they are postmarked or
electronically dated before the deadline.
Comments, including names, street
addresses, and other contact
information for respondents, will be
available for public review at the BLM
Idaho State Office address listed in
ADDRESSES during regular business
hours (7:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
holidays). Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your comment—
including your personal identifying
information—may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask
us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
II. Background
Although two BLM Districts in the
State of Idaho have issued rules
mirroring the State of Idaho Statutes on
underage possession and consumption
of alcohol, the BLM has no statewide
supplementary rules regarding the
illegal possession or use of alcohol on
public lands in Idaho. In the absence of
specific regulations, law enforcement
officers have regulated this illegal
behavior under broader regulations,
creating a lack of consistency with
surrounding governing entities. These
proposed supplementary rules will
bring consistency to all BLMadministered land throughout the State
and promote consistency between the
BLM and other agencies, including the
State of Idaho, County Sheriff’s Offices,
Idaho State Police, and various Federal
agencies where working relationships
and partnerships exist in public land
management.
In keeping with the BLM’s goal to
reduce threats to public health, safety,
and property, these proposed
supplementary rules are necessary to
protect natural resources, allow for safe
public recreation, reduce the potential
for damage to the environment, and
enhance the safety of visitors and
neighboring residents. Alcohol-related
offenses are a growing problem on the
public lands. Unlawful consumption of
alcohol and drugs has the potential to
pose a significant health and safety
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57813
hazard to all users. Operation of motor
vehicles while under the influence of
alcohol or drugs has been demonstrated
to result in the destruction of natural
resources and property, and/or serious
physical injury or death. Vandalism to
public land resources resulting from
illegal alcohol and drug use and the
clear risks to public safety demonstrate
the need for greater regulation of these
activities.
For the purposes of these proposed
supplementary rules, an alcoholic
beverage will be any liquid or solid
containing more than three percent of
alcohol by weight. The BLM has chosen
three percent alcohol by weight to
account for 3.2 percent beer sold in
Idaho. The State of Idaho defines an
alcoholic beverage as a liquid or solid
containing more than four percent of
alcohol by weight, and addresses
prohibition of open containers of beer in
motor vehicles, including 3.2 percent
beer, in a slightly different manner than
BLM rules. The BLM has determined
that setting the threshold at three
percent would be the clearest way to
account for all Idaho State prohibitions.
Possession of drug paraphernalia has
frequently been linked to other illegal
uses of controlled substances including
cultivation, manufacture, and
possession for distribution. The BLM, in
keeping with the mandates of the
President’s Office of National Drug
Control Policy 2009 National Drug
Control Strategy, will continue its
efforts to reduce illegal use of controlled
substances on public lands. These
proposed supplementary rules will
provide for consistent application and
enforcement of alcohol and drug
regulations on public lands, further
enhancing public safety by all public
land users.
These proposed supplementary rules
will supersede that portion of the
existing supplementary rule enacted in
the BLM Idaho Falls District (67 FR
30958) and the restriction orders (ID–
060–20 and ID–420–05) currently in
place for the BLM Coeur d’Alene
District pertaining to the underage
possession and consumption of
alcoholic beverages and the possession
of an open container of alcohol in a
motor vehicle.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The proposed supplementary rules
are not a significant regulatory action
and are not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. The proposed
supplementary rules will not have an
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
57814
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
effect of $100 million or more on the
economy. They will not adversely affect,
in a material way, the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. The proposed
supplementary rules will not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency. The
proposed supplementary rules do not
materially alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the right or obligations of
their recipients; nor do they raise novel
legal or policy issues. The rules govern
conduct for public use of a limited
selection of public lands and provide
greater consistency with the Idaho State
Code to protect public health and safety.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Clarity of the Supplementary Rules
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are
simple and easy to understand. The
BLM invites your comments on how to
make these proposed supplementary
rules easier to understand, including
answers to questions such as the
following:
(1) Are the requirements in the
proposed supplementary rules clearly
stated?
(2) Do the proposed supplementary
rules contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with their clarity?
(3) Does the format of the proposed
supplementary rules (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce their
clarity?
(4) Would the proposed
supplementary rules be easier to
understand if they were divided into
more (but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the proposed
supplementary rules in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble helpful to your
understanding of the proposed
supplementary rules? How could this
description be more helpful in making
the proposed supplementary rules easier
to understand? Please send any
comments you have on the clarity of the
proposed supplementary rules to the
address specified in the ADDRESSES
section.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has determined that this
proposed supplementary rule is
administrative in nature, and is
therefore categorically excluded from
environmental review under section
102(2)(C) of NEPA, pursuant to 43 CFR
46.205 and 46.210(c) and (i). The
proposed supplementary rule does not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
meet any of the 12 criteria for
exceptions to categorical exclusions
listed at 43 CFR 46.215. Pursuant to the
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and the
environmental regulations, policies, and
procedures of the Department of the
Interior, the term ‘‘categorical
exclusions’’ means a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment and that have
been found to have no such effect in
procedures adopted by a Federal agency
and for which neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure
that government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities. These proposed supplementary
rules govern the conduct of the public
using a limited area of public lands and
should have no effect on business
entities of any size. Therefore, the BLM
has determined under the RFA that
these proposed supplementary rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
These proposed supplementary rules
do not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would
not result in an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, an increase in
costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. These rules merely
establish the rules of conduct for public
use of a limited area of public lands and
do not affect commercial or business
activities of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These proposed supplementary rules
do not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector of more than $100 million
per year; nor do these proposed
supplementary rules have a significant
or unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. These
supplementary rules have no effect on
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
state, local, or tribal governments and
do not impose any requirements on any
of these entities. Therefore, the BLM is
not required to prepare a statement
containing the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
These proposed supplementary rules
do not have significant takings
implications, nor are they capable of
interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. Therefore, the
BLM has determined that these rules
will not cause a ‘‘taking’’ of private
property or require preparation of a
takings assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The proposed supplementary rules
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The
proposed supplementary rules do not
conflict with any Idaho state law or
regulation. Therefore, in accordance
with Executive Order 13132, the BLM
has determined that these proposed
supplementary rules do not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
The BLM has determined that these
proposed supplementary rules would
not unduly burden the judicial system
and that they meet the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The BLM has found that these
supplementary rules do not include
policies that have tribal implications.
The supplementary rules prohibit the
illegal use of alcoholic beverages and
illegal drugs on public lands and do not
involve Indian tribal rights.
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section
515 of Pub. L. 106–554) requires Federal
agencies to maintain adequate quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the
information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules,
the BLM did not conduct or use a study,
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
experiment, or survey or disseminate
any information to the public.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
These proposed supplementary rules
do not constitute a significant energy
action. The proposed supplementary
rules will not have an adverse effect on
energy supplies, production, or
consumption, and have no connection
with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed supplementary rules
do not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Author
The principal author of this
supplementary rule is Keith McGrath,
State Staff Law Enforcement Ranger,
Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the
Preamble, and under the authority of 43
CFR 8365.1–6, the Idaho State Director,
Bureau of Land Management, issues
supplementary rules for public lands in
Idaho, to read as follows:
designed for, travel on or immediately
over land, water, or other natural
terrain. On public land administered by
the BLM within the State of Idaho, you
must not:
A. Violate any state laws relating to
the purchase, possession, supply, use or
consumption of alcohol;
B. Drink from or possess an open
alcoholic beverage containers, including
beer or wine containers, while operating
or as a passenger in or on either a
vehicle or off highway vehicle; and
C. Possess any drug paraphernalia in
violation of any State law.
Penalties: On public lands under
section 303(a) of the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43
U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR 8360.0–7,
any person who violates any of these
supplementary rules may be tried before
a United States Magistrate and fined no
more than $1,000 or imprisoned for no
more than 12 months, or both. Such
violations may also be subject to
enhanced fines provided for by 18
U.S.C. 3571.
Peter J. Ditton,
Acting Idaho State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–23719 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Supplementary Rules for the State of
Idaho
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Definitions
Alcoholic beverage means any liquid
or solid, patented or not, containing
alcohol, spirits, or wine, and susceptible
of being consumed by a human being,
for beverage purposes, and containing
more than 3 percent of alcohol by
weight.
Alcohol means the product of
distillation of any fermented liquor,
rectified either once or more often,
whatever may be the origin thereof, or
synthetic ethyl alcohol.
Beer means any beverage obtained by
the alcoholic fermentation of an
infusion or decoction of barley, malt
and/or other ingredients in drinkable
water.
Wine means any alcoholic beverage
obtained by the fermentation of the
natural sugar content of fruits (grapes,
apples, etc.) or other agricultural
products containing sugar (honey, milk,
etc.).
Vehicle means any motorized
transportation conveyance designed and
licensed for use on roadways, such as an
automobile, bus, or truck, and any
motorized conveyance originally
equipped with safety belts.
Off Highway Vehicle means any
motorized vehicle capable of, or
[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–1084–1087
(Review)]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
Finland, Mexico, Netherlands, and
Sweden
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year
reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on purified
carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of a full review
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on purified
carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the
conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57815
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES: Effective Date: September 14,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Trainor (202–205–3354), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On September 7, 2010,
the Commission determined that
responses to its notice of institution of
the subject five-year reviews were such
that full reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed. A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in these reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57813-57815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23719]
[[Page 57813]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID9900000.L1210000.NU0000; G0-00]
Proposed Supplementary Rules on Public Land, Idaho
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Idaho State Office is
proposing supplementary rules relating to the illegal use of alcohol
and drugs on public lands in Idaho. The BLM is also proposing to
prohibit the possession of an open alcoholic beverage container by
operators or passengers in or on either a vehicle or off-highway
vehicle, on public land in Idaho administered by the BLM. These
supplementary rules are necessary to protect natural resources and the
health and safety of public land users. These supplementary rules will
allow BLM Law Enforcement personnel to continue enforcing existing
public land regulations pertaining to alcohol and drug use in a manner
consistent with current State of Idaho Statutes.
DATES: You should submit your comments by November 22, 2010. Comments
postmarked or received in person or by electronic mail after this date
may not be considered in the development of the final supplementary
rules.
ADDRESSES: Please mail or hand-deliver comments to Keith McGrath, State
Staff Law Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State
Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709; or e-mail comments to
Keith_McGrath@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith McGrath, Bureau of Land
Management, (208) 373-4046, Keith_McGrath@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may contact this
individual by calling the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
III. Other Procedural Matters
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments on the proposed supplementary rules should be
specific and confined to issues pertinent to the proposed rule, and
should explain the reason for any recommended change. Where possible,
comments should reference the specific section or paragraph of the
proposal that the commenter is addressing. The BLM is not obligated to
consider, or include in the Administrative Record for the final
supplementary rules, comments delivered to an address other than those
listed above (See ADDRESSES) or comments that the BLM receives after
the close of the comment period (See DATES), unless they are postmarked
or electronically dated before the deadline.
Comments, including names, street addresses, and other contact
information for respondents, will be available for public review at the
BLM Idaho State Office address listed in ADDRESSES during regular
business hours (7:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays). Before including your address, phone number, e-mail
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you
should be aware that your comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
II. Background
Although two BLM Districts in the State of Idaho have issued rules
mirroring the State of Idaho Statutes on underage possession and
consumption of alcohol, the BLM has no statewide supplementary rules
regarding the illegal possession or use of alcohol on public lands in
Idaho. In the absence of specific regulations, law enforcement officers
have regulated this illegal behavior under broader regulations,
creating a lack of consistency with surrounding governing entities.
These proposed supplementary rules will bring consistency to all BLM-
administered land throughout the State and promote consistency between
the BLM and other agencies, including the State of Idaho, County
Sheriff's Offices, Idaho State Police, and various Federal agencies
where working relationships and partnerships exist in public land
management.
In keeping with the BLM's goal to reduce threats to public health,
safety, and property, these proposed supplementary rules are necessary
to protect natural resources, allow for safe public recreation, reduce
the potential for damage to the environment, and enhance the safety of
visitors and neighboring residents. Alcohol-related offenses are a
growing problem on the public lands. Unlawful consumption of alcohol
and drugs has the potential to pose a significant health and safety
hazard to all users. Operation of motor vehicles while under the
influence of alcohol or drugs has been demonstrated to result in the
destruction of natural resources and property, and/or serious physical
injury or death. Vandalism to public land resources resulting from
illegal alcohol and drug use and the clear risks to public safety
demonstrate the need for greater regulation of these activities.
For the purposes of these proposed supplementary rules, an
alcoholic beverage will be any liquid or solid containing more than
three percent of alcohol by weight. The BLM has chosen three percent
alcohol by weight to account for 3.2 percent beer sold in Idaho. The
State of Idaho defines an alcoholic beverage as a liquid or solid
containing more than four percent of alcohol by weight, and addresses
prohibition of open containers of beer in motor vehicles, including 3.2
percent beer, in a slightly different manner than BLM rules. The BLM
has determined that setting the threshold at three percent would be the
clearest way to account for all Idaho State prohibitions.
Possession of drug paraphernalia has frequently been linked to
other illegal uses of controlled substances including cultivation,
manufacture, and possession for distribution. The BLM, in keeping with
the mandates of the President's Office of National Drug Control Policy
2009 National Drug Control Strategy, will continue its efforts to
reduce illegal use of controlled substances on public lands. These
proposed supplementary rules will provide for consistent application
and enforcement of alcohol and drug regulations on public lands,
further enhancing public safety by all public land users.
These proposed supplementary rules will supersede that portion of
the existing supplementary rule enacted in the BLM Idaho Falls District
(67 FR 30958) and the restriction orders (ID-060-20 and ID-420-05)
currently in place for the BLM Coeur d'Alene District pertaining to the
underage possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages and the
possession of an open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The proposed supplementary rules are not a significant regulatory
action and are not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866. The proposed supplementary rules
will not have an
[[Page 57814]]
effect of $100 million or more on the economy. They will not adversely
affect, in a material way, the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities. The proposed supplementary rules
will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency. The proposed supplementary
rules do not materially alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the right or obligations of
their recipients; nor do they raise novel legal or policy issues. The
rules govern conduct for public use of a limited selection of public
lands and provide greater consistency with the Idaho State Code to
protect public health and safety.
Clarity of the Supplementary Rules
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are simple and easy to understand. The BLM invites your comments
on how to make these proposed supplementary rules easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the proposed supplementary rules
clearly stated?
(2) Do the proposed supplementary rules contain technical language
or jargon that interferes with their clarity?
(3) Does the format of the proposed supplementary rules (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce their clarity?
(4) Would the proposed supplementary rules be easier to understand
if they were divided into more (but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the proposed supplementary rules in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this preamble helpful to your
understanding of the proposed supplementary rules? How could this
description be more helpful in making the proposed supplementary rules
easier to understand? Please send any comments you have on the clarity
of the proposed supplementary rules to the address specified in the
ADDRESSES section.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has determined that this proposed supplementary rule is
administrative in nature, and is therefore categorically excluded from
environmental review under section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, pursuant to 43
CFR 46.205 and 46.210(c) and (i). The proposed supplementary rule does
not meet any of the 12 criteria for exceptions to categorical
exclusions listed at 43 CFR 46.215. Pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and the environmental
regulations, policies, and procedures of the Department of the
Interior, the term ``categorical exclusions'' means a category of
actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment and that have been found to have no
such effect in procedures adopted by a Federal agency and for which
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. These proposed supplementary
rules govern the conduct of the public using a limited area of public
lands and should have no effect on business entities of any size.
Therefore, the BLM has determined under the RFA that these proposed
supplementary rules would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
These proposed supplementary rules do not constitute a ``major
rule'' as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would not result in an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, an increase in costs or
prices, or significant adverse effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-
based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic
and export markets. These rules merely establish the rules of conduct
for public use of a limited area of public lands and do not affect
commercial or business activities of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These proposed supplementary rules do not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of
more than $100 million per year; nor do these proposed supplementary
rules have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. These supplementary rules have no
effect on state, local, or tribal governments and do not impose any
requirements on any of these entities. Therefore, the BLM is not
required to prepare a statement containing the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
These proposed supplementary rules do not have significant takings
implications, nor are they capable of interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. Therefore, the BLM has determined that these
rules will not cause a ``taking'' of private property or require
preparation of a takings assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The proposed supplementary rules will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. The proposed
supplementary rules do not conflict with any Idaho state law or
regulation. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, the
BLM has determined that these proposed supplementary rules do not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
The BLM has determined that these proposed supplementary rules
would not unduly burden the judicial system and that they meet the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The BLM has found that these supplementary rules do not include
policies that have tribal implications. The supplementary rules
prohibit the illegal use of alcoholic beverages and illegal drugs on
public lands and do not involve Indian tribal rights.
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106-554)
requires Federal agencies to maintain adequate quality, objectivity,
utility, and integrity of the information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules, the BLM did not conduct or use a
study,
[[Page 57815]]
experiment, or survey or disseminate any information to the public.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
These proposed supplementary rules do not constitute a significant
energy action. The proposed supplementary rules will not have an
adverse effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption, and have
no connection with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed supplementary rules do not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Author
The principal author of this supplementary rule is Keith McGrath,
State Staff Law Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the Preamble, and under the authority of
43 CFR 8365.1-6, the Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land Management,
issues supplementary rules for public lands in Idaho, to read as
follows:
Supplementary Rules for the State of Idaho
Definitions
Alcoholic beverage means any liquid or solid, patented or not,
containing alcohol, spirits, or wine, and susceptible of being consumed
by a human being, for beverage purposes, and containing more than 3
percent of alcohol by weight.
Alcohol means the product of distillation of any fermented liquor,
rectified either once or more often, whatever may be the origin
thereof, or synthetic ethyl alcohol.
Beer means any beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of
an infusion or decoction of barley, malt and/or other ingredients in
drinkable water.
Wine means any alcoholic beverage obtained by the fermentation of
the natural sugar content of fruits (grapes, apples, etc.) or other
agricultural products containing sugar (honey, milk, etc.).
Vehicle means any motorized transportation conveyance designed and
licensed for use on roadways, such as an automobile, bus, or truck, and
any motorized conveyance originally equipped with safety belts.
Off Highway Vehicle means any motorized vehicle capable of, or
designed for, travel on or immediately over land, water, or other
natural terrain. On public land administered by the BLM within the
State of Idaho, you must not:
A. Violate any state laws relating to the purchase, possession,
supply, use or consumption of alcohol;
B. Drink from or possess an open alcoholic beverage containers,
including beer or wine containers, while operating or as a passenger in
or on either a vehicle or off highway vehicle; and
C. Possess any drug paraphernalia in violation of any State law.
Penalties: On public lands under section 303(a) of the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR 8360.0-
7, any person who violates any of these supplementary rules may be
tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000
or imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or both. Such violations may
also be subject to enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C. 3571.
Peter J. Ditton,
Acting Idaho State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-23719 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P