Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993Robotics Technology Consortium, Inc., 57502 [C1-2010-22215]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
57502
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices
briefs must conform with the provisions
of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is January
20, 2011. Parties may also file written
testimony in connection with their
presentation at the hearing, as provided
in section 207.24 of the Commission’s
rules, and posthearing briefs, which
must conform with the provisions of
section 207.67 of the Commission’s
rules. The deadline for filing
posthearing briefs is February 10, 2011;
witness testimony must be filed no later
than three days before the hearing. In
addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the
reviews may submit a written statement
of information pertinent to the subject of
the reviews on or before February 10,
2011. On March 7, 2011, the
Commission will make available to
parties all information on which they
have not had an opportunity to
comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before March 9, 2011, but such final
comments must not contain new factual
information and must otherwise comply
with section 207.68 of the Commission’s
rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even
where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also
be filed in paper form, as specified in
II(c) of the Commission’s Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR
68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:52 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to section 207.62 of
the Commission’s rules.
Issued: September 14, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,281]
[FR Doc. 2010–23474 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Robotics Technology
Consortium, Inc.
Correction
In notice document 2010–22215
beginning on page 54914 in the issue of
Thursday, July 9, 2010, make the
following corrections:
1. On page 54914, in the first column,
in the sixteenth line below the
document subject, ‘‘AEB, Inc.’’ should
read ‘‘ABB, Inc.’’.
2. On the same page, in the same
column, in the 23rd line below the
document subject, ‘‘BEN Technologies
Corp’’ should read ‘‘BBN Technologies
Corp’’.
3. On the same page, in the same
column, in the eighth line from the
bottom of the page, ‘‘Amstin, TX’’ should
read ‘‘Austin, TX’’.
4. On the same page, in the same
column, in the last line of the column,
‘‘101–Integrated Consultants, Inc.’’
should read ‘‘ICI–Integrated Consultants,
Inc.’’
5. On the same page, in the third
column, in the first full paragraph, in
the second and third lines, ‘‘activity of
this group research additional written
membership’’ should read ‘‘ activity of
the group research project. Membership
in this group research project remains
open, and RTC intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.’’
6. On the same page, in the same
column, in the second full paragraph, in
the first through sixth lines, ‘‘On
October 15, pursuant to Section the
group research project. Membership in
the project remains open, and RTC
intends to file notifications disclosing
all changes. In 2009, RTC filed its
original notification 6(a) of the Act.’’
should read, ‘‘On October 15, 2009, RTC
filed its original notification pursuant to
section 6(a) of the Act.’’
[FR Doc. C1–2010–22215 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am]
Humana Insurance Company, a
Division Of Carenetwork, Inc., Green
Bay, WI; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated August 23, 2010,
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
August 13, 2010. The Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on August 30, 2010 (75
FR 52986). Workers are engaged in
employment related to the supply of
health insurance benefits.
The negative determination
applicable to workers and former
workers at Humana Insurance Company,
a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Green
Bay, Wisconsin was based on the
findings that the subject firm did not,
during the period under investigation,
shift to a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with the supply of
health insurance benefits provided by
the workers or acquire these services
from a foreign country; that the workers’
separation, or threat of separation, was
not related to any increase in imports of
like or directly competitive services;
and that the workers did not supply a
service that was directly used in the
production of an article or the supply of
service by a firm that employed a
worker group that is eligible to apply for
TAA based on the aforementioned
article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners provided additional
information pertaining to a shift in
services abroad.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2010-22215]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Robotics Technology Consortium, Inc.
Correction
In notice document 2010-22215 beginning on page 54914 in the issue
of Thursday, July 9, 2010, make the following corrections:
1. On page 54914, in the first column, in the sixteenth line below
the document subject, ``AEB, Inc.'' should read ``ABB, Inc.''.
2. On the same page, in the same column, in the 23rd line below the
document subject, ``BEN Technologies Corp'' should read ``BBN
Technologies Corp''.
3. On the same page, in the same column, in the eighth line from
the bottom of the page, ``Amstin, TX'' should read ``Austin, TX''.
4. On the same page, in the same column, in the last line of the
column, ``101-Integrated Consultants, Inc.'' should read ``ICI-
Integrated Consultants, Inc.''
5. On the same page, in the third column, in the first full
paragraph, in the second and third lines, ``activity of this group
research additional written membership'' should read `` activity of the
group research project. Membership in this group research project
remains open, and RTC intends to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.''
6. On the same page, in the same column, in the second full
paragraph, in the first through sixth lines, ``On October 15, pursuant
to Section the group research project. Membership in the project
remains open, and RTC intends to file notifications disclosing all
changes. In 2009, RTC filed its original notification 6(a) of the
Act.'' should read, ``On October 15, 2009, RTC filed its original
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act.''
[FR Doc. C1-2010-22215 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
