Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure for Residential Clothes Washers, 57556-57595 [2010-22225]
Download as PDF
57556
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–TP–0021]
RIN 1904–AC08
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Test Procedure
for Residential Clothes Washers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NOPR) and public meeting.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) proposes amending its
test procedure for residential clothes
washers under the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act to provide for
measuring standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, and to update the
active mode test procedure. DOE is also
proposing to eliminate an obsolete
clothes washer test procedure currently
codified in the Code of Federal
Regulations, and is announcing a public
meeting to discuss and receive
comments on the issues presented in
this NOPR.
DATES: DOE will hold a public meeting
on Thursday, October 28, 2010, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m., in Washington, DC. DOE
must receive requests to speak at the
public meeting before 4 p.m., Thursday,
October 14, 2010. DOE must receive a
signed original and an electronic copy
of statements to be given at the public
meeting before 4 p.m., Thursday,
October 21, 2010.
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding the NOPR before
and after the public meeting, but no
later than December 6, 2010. For details,
see section V, ‘‘Public Participation,’’ of
this NOPR.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 1E–245, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. To attend
the public meeting, please notify Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945.
Please note that foreign nationals
visiting DOE Headquarters are subject to
advance security screening procedures.
Any foreign national wishing to
participate in the meeting should advise
DOE as soon as possible by contacting
Ms. Edwards to initiate the necessary
procedures.
Any comments submitted must
identify the NOPR on Test Procedures
for Residential Clothes Washers, and
provide the docket number EERE–2010–
BT–TP–0021 and/or regulatory
information number (RIN) 1904–AC08.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
Comments may be submitted using any
of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail: RES-CW-2010-TP0021@ee.doe.gov. Include docket
number EERE–2010–BT–TP–0021 and/
or RIN 1904–AC08 in the subject line of
the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. Please submit one
signed original paper copy.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see Section V, ‘‘Public Participation,’’ of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, visit the U.S.
Department of Energy, Resource Room
of the Building Technologies Program,
6th Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024, (202) 586–2945,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Please call Ms. Brenda Edwards at the
above telephone number for additional
information about visiting the Resource
Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Stephen L. Witkowski, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, Building Technologies
Program, EE–2J, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0121. Telephone: (202) 586–7463.
E-mail: mailto:Stephen.Witkowski
@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Jennifer Tiedeman, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC–71, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0121. Telephone: (202) 287–6111.
E-mail: mailto:Jennifer.Tiedeman
@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or
review public comments and on how
to participate in the public meeting,
contact Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, Building Technologies
Program, EE–2J, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
0121. Telephone: (202) 586–2945.
E-mail: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Legal Authority
II. Summary of the Proposal
III. Discussion
A. Products Covered by This Test
Procedure Change
B. Compliance Date of Proposed Test
Procedure
C. Standby Mode, Off Mode, and
Additional Active Mode Test Procedures
1. Incorporating by Reference IEC Standard
62301 for Measuring Standby Mode and
Off Mode Power Consumption
2. Determination of Modes To Be
Incorporated
3. Adding Specifications for the Test
Methods and Measurements for Standby
Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active
Mode Testing
4. Calculation of Energy Use Associated
With Each Operating Mode
5. Measures of Energy Consumption
D. Clothes Washer Active Mode Test
Procedure
1. Technologies Not Covered by the
Current Clothes Washer Test Procedure
a. Steam Wash Cycles
b. Self-Clean Cycles
c. Adaptive Control Technologies
d. Demand Response Technology
2. Changes to Reflect Current Usage
Patterns and Capabilities
a. Representative Annual Cycles
b. Test Load Size Specifications
c. Use Factors
3. Test Cloth
4. Other Revisions and Clarifications
a. Clothes Washer Capacity Measurement
Method
b. New Measure of Water Consumption
c. Energy Test Cycle
d. Detergent Specifications for Test Cloth
Preconditioning
e. Clothes Washer for Test Cloth
Preconditioning
f. Water Supply Pressure
g. Additional Revisions and Clarifications
5. Test Procedure Performance
Specifications
E. Compliance With Other EPCA
Requirements
1. Test Burden
2. Integration of Standby Mode and Off
Mode Energy Consumption Into the
Efficiency Metrics
3. Commercial Clothes Washers
F. Impact of the Proposed Amendments on
EnergyGuide and ENERGY STAR
G. Elimination of the Obsolete Clothes
Washer Test Procedure
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal
Energy Administration (FEA) Act of 1974
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests to
Speak
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
1. Incorporation of IEC Standard 62301
2. Clothes Washer Modes
3. Default Settings
4. Delay Start Mode
5. Test Room Ambient Temperature
6. Energy Use Calculation
7. New Integrated Measures of Energy
Consumption and Energy Efficiency
8. Annual Energy Cost Calculation
9. Steam Wash Cycles
10. Self-Clean Cycles
11. Adaptive Control and Demand
Response Technologies
12. Representative Number of Annual
Cycles
13. Test Load Size Specifications
14. Use Factors
15. Test Cloth
16. Capacity Measurement Method
17. New Integrated Measure of Water
Consumption
18. Energy Test Cycle Definition
19. Detergent Specifications
20. Clothes Washer for Preconditioning
21. Water Supply Pressure
22. Impact on Commercial Clothes Washers
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Background and Legal Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291 et
seq.) (EPCA or the Act) sets forth a
variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency. Part A of
Title III (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309)
establishes the ‘‘Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles,’’ which covers
consumer products and certain
commercial products (all of which are
referred to below as ‘‘covered
products’’). These include residential
clothes washers, the subject of today’s
notice. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(7))
Under the Act, this program consists
essentially of three parts: (1) Testing, (2)
labeling, and (3) Federal energy
conservation standards. The testing
requirements consist of test procedures
that, pursuant to EPCA, manufacturers
of covered products must use as the
basis for certifying to DOE that their
products comply with the applicable
energy conservation standards adopted
under EPCA and for representations
about the efficiency of those products.
DOE also must use these test
requirements to determine whether the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
products comply with EPCA standards.
Section 323 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6293)
sets forth criteria and procedures for
DOE’s adoption and amendment of such
test procedures. EPCA provides that
‘‘[a]ny test procedures prescribed or
amended under this section shall be
reasonably designed to produce test
results which measure energy
efficiency, energy use * * * or
estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use, as
determined by the Secretary [of Energy],
and shall not be unduly burdensome to
conduct.’’ (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) In
addition, if DOE determines that a test
procedure amendment is warranted, it
must publish proposed test procedures
and offer the public an opportunity to
present oral and written comments on
them. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2))
Finally, in any rulemaking to amend
a test procedure, DOE must determine
‘‘to what extent, if any, the proposed test
procedure would alter the measured
energy efficiency * * * of any covered
product as determined under the
existing test procedure.’’ (42 U.S.C.
6293(e)(1)) If DOE determines that the
amended test procedure would alter the
measured efficiency of a covered
product, DOE must amend the
applicable energy conservation standard
accordingly. In determining the
amended energy conservation standard,
the Secretary shall measure, pursuant to
the amended test procedure, the energy
efficiency, energy use, or water use of a
representative sample of covered
products that minimally comply with
the existing standard. The average of
such energy efficiency, energy use, or
water use levels determined under the
amended test procedure shall constitute
the amended energy conservation
standard for the applicable covered
products. (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(2)) EPCA
also states that ‘‘models of covered
products in use before the date on
which the amended energy conservation
standard becomes effective (or revisions
of such models that come into use after
such date and have the same energy
efficiency, energy use, or water use
characteristics) that comply with the
energy conservation standard applicable
to such covered products on the day
before such date shall be deemed to
comply with the amended energy
conservation standard.’’ (42 U.S.C.
6293(e)(2))
The DOE test procedure for clothes
washers currently being manufactured
is found at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix J1. DOE adopted appendix J1
in 1997 to correct for changes in
consumer habits that resulted in an
overstatement of average annual energy
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57557
consumption when using the methods
specified in appendix J. 62 FR 45508
(Aug. 27, 1997). DOE added appendix
J1, rather than amending appendix J, to
accommodate continued use of
appendix J until DOE amended the
residential clothes washer conservation
standards to reference the new appendix
J1. On January 12, 2001, DOE published
a final rule (hereinafter referred to as the
January 2001 final rule), to amend the
energy conservation standards for
residential clothes washers to reference
the efficiency metrics as defined in
appendix J1. 66 FR 3314. Use of the
amended J1 test procedure was required
to demonstrate compliance with these
amended energy conservation standards
as of January 1, 2004. Since 1997, DOE
has amended the test procedure in
appendix J1 three times, twice
substantively to address test cloth
correlation procedures, and once to
correct the introductory note. 63 FR
16669 (Apr. 6, 1998); 66 FR 3330 (Jan.
12, 2001); 68 FR 62204 (Oct. 31, 2003).
One of these amendments also included
an amendment to Appendix J. 66 FR
3330 (Jan. 12, 2001). Because appendix
J applies only to clothes washers
manufactured before January 1, 2004,
however, appendix J is now obsolete. 10
CFR 430 appendix J1.
The current applicable test procedure
includes provisions for determining the
modified energy factor (MEF) for clothes
washers, which is a function of the total
energy used for each cubic foot (ft3) of
clothes washer capacity. The test
procedure measures the total energy
consumption of the clothes washer. It
also accounts for the amount of energy
required to heat the water and
subsequently dry the load based on the
remaining moisture content (RMC) of
the clothes at the completion of the
machine’s full cycle. The test procedure
does not currently address energy use in
the standby or off modes.
Clothes washer energy conservation
standards were originally established by
the National Appliance Energy
Conservation Act of 1987, which
amended EPCA to prescribe that clothes
washers manufactured on or after
January 1, 1988, have an unheated rinse
option. (42 U.S.C. 6295 (g)) The
amendments to EPCA also required DOE
to conduct a rulemaking by January 1,
1990, to determine if the above
mentioned standards should be
amended. A final rule was issued on
May 14, 1991, (hereinafter referred to as
the May 1991 final rule) establishing the
first set of performance standards for
residential clothes washers. Compliance
with these standards was required for
products manufactured on or after May
14, 1994. 56 FR 22279. EPCA also
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57558
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
required DOE to conduct a subsequent
rulemaking no later than 5 years after
the date of publication of the previous
final rule to determine whether to
amend those standards. A final rule
establishing revised standards for
residential clothes washers was
published in the January 2001 final rule.
66 FR 3313. The January 2001 final rule
required all new residential clothes
washers manufactured after January 1,
2007 to be 35 percent more efficient
than clothes washers minimally
compliant with the efficiency standards
established in the May 1991 final rule.
The Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), Public
Law 110–140, amended EPCA and, in
relevant part, revised the energy
conservation standards for residential
clothes washers. The revised standards
established a maximum water
consumption factor (WF) of 9.5,
effective January 1, 2011. EISA 2007
further required that DOE publish a
final rule no later than December 31,
2011 determining whether to amend the
standards in effect for clothes washers
manufactured on or after January 1,
2015. (42 U.S.C. 6295(g)(9))
Consequently, DOE is conducting a
separate standards rulemaking for these
products.
The EISA 2007 amendments to EPCA
also direct DOE to amend its test
procedures to integrate measures of
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other
energy descriptor for each covered
product unless the current test
procedure already fully accounts for and
incorporates standby and off mode
energy consumption or such integration
is technically infeasible. If an integrated
test procedure is technically infeasible,
DOE must prescribe a separate standby
mode and off mode energy use test
procedure for the covered product, if
technically feasible. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A))
Any such amendment must consider
the most current versions of the
International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) Standard 62301,
‘‘Household electrical appliances—
measurement of standby power,’’ First
Edition 2005–06, and IEC Standard
62087, ‘‘Methods of measurement for the
power consumption of audio, video, and
related equipment,’’ Second Edition,
2008–09.1 2 In developing these test
1 IEC standards are available online at https://
www.iec.ch.
2 Multiple editions of this standard are referenced
in this notice. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms
‘‘IEC Standard 62301’’ or ‘‘IEC Standard 62301 First
Edition’’ refer to ‘‘Household electrical appliances–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
procedure amendments for clothes
washers, DOE initially determined that
it would consider a revised IEC
Standard 62301 expected to be released
in July 2009. DOE subsequently found
that this revision is expected to be
delayed until late-2010, so DOE
determined it appropriate to proceed
with an amended test procedure based
on the current version of IEC Standard
62301, First Edition 2005–06. DOE is
also considering a draft version of IEC
Standard 62301, Final Draft
International Standard (IEC Standard
62301 FDIS), for updated mode
definitions, which are expected to be
included in the final revised IEC
Standard 62301, Second Edition.
On August 28, 2009, DOE published
a notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of a
framework document to initiate a
rulemaking to consider amended energy
conservation standards for residential
clothes washers (hereafter the August
2009 framework document). 74 FR
44306. In the August 2009 framework
document, DOE requested comments on
the merits of revising the clothes washer
test procedure, and sought input
regarding how the test procedure could
be improved. DOE held a public
meeting on September 21, 2009
(September 2009 public meeting). In
addition, DOE requested written
comments, data, and information on the
August 2009 framework document,
which it accepted through September
28, 2009.
DOE received comments in response
to the August 2009 framework
document stating that it should consider
changes to the active mode test
procedure. As a result, in addition to
amending its test procedure for clothes
washers to include measures for standby
and off mode power consumption, DOE
proposes to address issues regarding the
active mode provisions of the test
procedure.
II. Summary of the Proposal
In today’s NOPR, DOE proposes
amending the test procedure for clothes
washers to assist DOE in the concurrent
development and implementation of
standards that address use of standby
mode and off mode power by these
products. Specifically, DOE proposes to
integrate measures of standby mode and
off mode power consumption, as well as
measures of power consumption in
certain additional modes determined to
be part of active mode, into the test
procedure. DOE also proposes, for the
measurement of energy use in active
measurement of standby power,’’ First Edition
2005–06.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
mode, to: (1) Adopt technical changes
and procedures for accurately
measuring the energy consumption of
clothes washers with technologies not
covered by the current procedure;
(2) more accurately reflect current
consumer behavior and clothes washer
capabilities; (3) address issues related to
the test cloth, detergent, and certain test
equipment; (4) revise and clarify the
existing methods and calculations; and
(5) delete obsolete appendix J to subpart
B of CFR part 430 and references
thereto. The following paragraphs
summarize these proposed changes.
To integrate measures of standby
mode and off mode power consumption
into the test procedure, DOE proposes to
incorporate by reference into the clothes
washer test procedure specific
provisions from IEC Standard 62301
regarding test conditions and test
procedures for measuring standby mode
and off mode power consumption. DOE
also proposes to incorporate into the test
procedure the definitions of ‘‘active
mode,’’ ‘‘standby mode,’’ and ‘‘off mode’’
that are based on the definitions
provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS.
Further, DOE proposes to include in the
test procedure additional language that
would clarify the application of clauses
from IEC Standard 62301 for measuring
standby mode and off mode power
consumption.3 In addition, DOE
proposes to incorporate energy
consumption associated with delay start
and cycle finished modes. Although
these modes would be considered part
of active mode, the measurements and
calculations proposed for them are
similar to those proposed for standby
and off modes. DOE also proposes to:
(1) Establish a new measure of energy
use to calculate the per-cycle standby
mode, off mode, delay start mode, and
cycle finished mode energy
consumption; and (2) adopt a new
measure of energy efficiency (integrated
modified energy factor (IMEF)) that
includes the energy used in the active,
standby, and off modes. As indicated
above, DOE energy conservation
standards currently do not address the
energy use of clothes washers in the
standby or off modes. Section
325(gg)(2)(C) of EPCA provides that
amendments to the test procedures to
include standby and off mode energy
3 EISA 2007 directs DOE to also consider IEC
Standard 62087 when amending its test procedure
to include standby mode and off mode energy
consumption. See 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A). DOE
considered IEC Standard 62087 and concluded that
because IEC Standard 62087 addresses the methods
of measuring the power consumption of audio,
video, and related equipment, the narrow scope of
this particular IEC Standard reduces its relevance
to today’s proposal. Further details are provided
later in this notice.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
consumption will not be used to
determine compliance with previously
established standards. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2(C)).
For the measurement of active mode
energy use other than in delay start and
cycle finished modes, DOE proposes to:
(1) Update the test procedure to
address technologies not covered by the
current procedure, based upon
comments from interested parties in
response to the August 2009 framework
document and further review by DOE.
These technologies include steam wash
and self-cleaning cycles. Steam wash
cycles inject steam into the wash basket,
and claim to offer more effective
cleaning. Self-clean cycles enable
consumers to intermittently, typically
once per month, run a self-clean cycle
to prevent odor, bacteria, and mildew
from building up in the clothes washer.
DOE proposes to amend the test
procedure to measure energy use in
steam and self-clean cycles. DOE also
received comments regarding demand
response technologies, and investigated
adaptive controls other than adaptive
fill control. Demand response features
enable an appliance to shift its activity
based on interaction with the electric
grid, utilities, or user programming.
Adaptive controls enable a clothes
washer to adjust parameters such as
agitation speed, number of rinses, wash
time, and wash and rinse temperatures
based on the size, fabric mix, and soil
level of a wash load. However, for
reasons discussed in sections III.D.1.c
and III.D.1.d, DOE is not proposing to
update the test procedure to include
provisions for measuring the energy
consumption of clothes washers offering
demand response technologies or
adaptive controls other than adaptive
fill control.
(2) Amend the test procedure for
clothes washers to reflect current usage
patterns and capabilities. DOE received
multiple comments on this issue in
response to the August 2009 framework
document, and reviewed current
consumer data from surveys conducted
in 2004 and 2005 to determine whether
such updates are appropriate. The
proposed amendments address the
following specific issues: Representative
average-use cycles per year for a clothes
washer, test load size specifications, and
consumer use factors. The proposed
amendments are based on recent data
that more accurately describe current
consumer behavior and updated clothes
washer capabilities.
(3) Amend the test procedure to
update the procedure and specifications
for determining test cloth correlations,
change the tolerances regarding the size
and weight of the test cloth, and revise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
the detergent and preconditioning
clothes washer specifications due to
obsolescence or anticipated
obsolescence of the existing test
materials and equipment specified in
the test procedure. These proposed
amendments are based on multiple
comments received in response to the
August 2009 framework document and
at the September 2009 public meeting
regarding the test cloth used in the
current test procedure.
(4) Update the test procedure to
clarify or revise the existing methods
and calculations for measuring clothes
container capacity, calculating water
consumption factor, determining the
energy test cycle, and setting the supply
water test conditions. The current
capacity measurement provisions can be
interpreted in multiple ways. Different
allowable interpretations of the
maximum water fill level used for the
measurement can produce inconsistent
results that may not accurately reflect
the actual usable volume of a clothes
washer. The proposed revisions revise
the capacity measurement specifications
so that interpretations are more likely to
be uniform, repeatable, and
representative, thereby ensuring the
data is reported consistently. DOE
proposes to adopt a new measure of
water consumption, integrated water
consumption factor (IWF) that would
include water used in self-clean cycles.
The IWF would also include water
consumption from all energy test cycles,
rather than only from the cold wash/
cold rinse cycle as the test procedure
currently requires. DOE also proposes to
clarify the energy test cycle definition
and the supply water test conditions
specification.
DOE has also investigated how each
of the proposed amendments to the
active mode provisions for clothes
washers, discussed above would affect
the measured efficiency of products. See
section III.D for further details. Because
of the potential for significant impacts
to the measured efficiency of products,
DOE proposes to codify the amended
clothes washer test procedure as
appendix J2 in 10 CFR part 430 subpart
B. Manufacturers would not be required
to use appendix J2 to demonstrate
compliance with clothes washer energy
conservation standards until the
compliance date of new standards,
which would take into account any test
procedure amendments. Until that time,
manufacturers would be required to use
existing appendix J1.
Finally, DOE proposes to delete
appendix J to subpart B of CFR part 430,
along with all references to appendix J
in 10 CFR part 430.23. Appendix J only
applies to clothes washers
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57559
manufactured before January 1, 2004,
and is now obsolete. Appendix J1 would
retain its current designation and not be
re-designated as Appendix J.
III. Discussion
A. Products Covered by This Test
Procedure Change
Today’s proposed amendments to the
DOE test procedure cover residential
clothes washers, which DOE’s
regulations define as follows:
Clothes washer means a consumer
product designed to clean clothes,
utilizing a water solution of soap and/
or detergent and mechanical agitation or
other movement, and must be one of the
following classes: automatic clothes
washers, semi-automatic clothes
washers, and other clothes washers.
Automatic clothes washer means a
class of clothes washer which has a
control system which is capable of
scheduling a preselected combination of
operations, such as regulation of water
temperature, regulation of the water fill
level, and performance of wash, rinse,
drain, and spin functions without the
need for user intervention subsequent to
the initiation of machine operation.
Some models may require user
intervention to initiate these different
segments of the cycle after the machine
has begun operation, but they do not
require the user to intervene to regulate
the water temperature by adjusting the
external water faucet valves.
Semi-automatic clothes washer means
a class of clothes washer that is the
same as an automatic clothes washer
except that user intervention is required
to regulate the water temperature by
adjusting the external water faucet
valves.
Other clothes washer means a class of
clothes washer which is not an
automatic or semi-automatic clothes
washer. 10 CFR 430.2.
DOE is not proposing any
amendments to these definitions in
today’s NOPR. The clothes washers
covered by these definitions, and by
today’s proposed amendments, include
top-loading compact (less than 1.6 ft3
capacity); top-loading standard size (1.6
ft3 or greater capacity); top-loading,
semi-automatic; front-loading; and sudssaving clothes washers.
B. Compliance Date of Proposed Test
Procedure
As stated previously, DOE originally
considered reviewing a revised IEC
Standard 62301, expected to be released
in July 2009, in the development of
these test procedure amendments. DOE
received comments in response to the
August 2009 framework document
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57560
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
jointly from the Appliance Standards
Awareness Project (ASAP), the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and
the National Consumer Law Center
(NCLC) (Joint Comment); and the
Alliance to Save Energy (ASE), stating
that the IEC 62301 revision process may
take longer than previously thought and
that DOE should proceed with updating
the clothes washer test procedure. (Joint
Comment, No. 14 at p. 1 4; ASE, No. 22
at p. 1) Additionally, Northeast Energy
Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP)
commented that waiting for the IEC
process to finalize could be detrimental
to the standards rulemaking, and that
DOE should consider quickly revising
the test procedure independently after
the IEC procedure is finalized. (NEEP,
No. 20 at p. 1)
DOE agrees that the revision to IEC
Standard 62301 is expected to be
delayed; the revision is currently
expected in late 2010. Therefore, DOE
proposes basing the amendments to the
clothes washer test on the first edition
of IEC Standard 62301, as well as draft
versions of the second edition, in the
issuance of this NOPR. Such action is
necessary to permit manufacturers to
certify that their products comply with
any newly established energy
conservation standards that take into
account standby and off mode energy
use.
The amended test procedure would
become effective 30 days after the date
of publication in the Federal Register of
the final rule in this test procedure
rulemaking. However, DOE would
clarify in the published amended test
procedure in 10 CFR part 430 subpart B
appendix J2 that it need not be used to
determine compliance with current
energy conservation standards. Instead,
manufacturers would be required to
begin using the test procedures in
appendix J2 on the compliance date of
any final rule establishing amended
energy conservation standards that
would, in part, address standby and off
mode power consumption for these
products. 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(C).
4 A notation in the form ‘‘Joint Comment, No. 14
at p. 1’’ identifies a written comment (1) made by
ASAP, NRDC, and NCLC jointly; (2) recorded in
document number 14 that is filed in the docket of
the clothes washer energy conservation standards
rulemaking (Docket No. EERE–2008–BT–STD–0019)
and maintained in the Resource Room of the
Building Technologies Program; and (3) which
appears on page 1 of document number 14.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
C. Standby Mode, Off Mode, and
Additional Active Mode Test Procedures
1. Incorporating by Reference IEC
Standard 62301 for Measuring Standby
Mode and Off Mode Power
Consumption
As required by EPCA, as amended by
EISA 2007, DOE considered the most
current versions of IEC Standard 62301
and IEC Standard 62087 for measuring
power consumption in standby mode
and off mode when developing today’s
proposed amendments to the clothes
washer test procedure. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) DOE noted that IEC
Standard 62301 provides for measuring
standby power in electrical appliances,
including clothes washers, and thus is
relevant here. DOE also reviewed IEC
Standard 62087, which specifies
methods of measuring the power
consumption of TV receivers, video
cassette recorders (VCRs), set top boxes,
audio equipment, and multi-function
equipment for consumer use. IEC
Standard 62087 does not, however,
include methods for measuring the
power consumption of electrical
appliances such as clothes washers.
Therefore, DOE has determined that IEC
Standard 62087 is inapplicable to this
rulemaking, and has not included any of
its provisions in today’s proposed test
procedure.
DOE proposes to incorporate by
reference into this test procedure all
applicable provisions from Sections 4
and 5 of IEC Standard 62301.
Specifically, DOE proposes to
incorporate, from section 4, (‘‘General
conditions for measurements’’),
paragraph 4.2, ‘‘Test room;’’ paragraph
4.4, ‘‘Supply voltage waveform;’’
paragraph 4.5, ‘‘Power measurement
accuracy;’’ and from section 5,
(‘‘Measurements’’), paragraph 5.1,
‘‘General,’’ Note 1; and paragraph 5.3,
‘‘Procedure.’’ These clauses provide test
conditions and test procedures for
measuring average standby mode and
average off mode power consumption.
With respect to test conditions, section
4 of IEC Standard 62301 provides
specifications for the test room
conditions, supply voltage waveform,
and power measurement meter
tolerances to ensure repeatable and
precise measurements of standby mode
and off mode power consumption. With
respect to test procedures, section 5 of
IEC Standard 62301 provides methods
for measuring power consumption when
the power measurement is stable and
when it is unstable.
DOE invites comment on whether IEC
Standard 62301 measures standby and
off mode power consumption for clothes
washers adequately, and whether
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
incorporating these specific provisions
into the DOE test procedure is
appropriate.
2. Determination of Modes To Be
Incorporated
EPCA provides the following mode
definitions:
‘‘Active mode’’ is defined as the
condition in which an energy-using
product is connected to a main power
source, has been activated, and provides
one or more main functions. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(1)(A)(i))
‘‘Standby mode’’ is defined as the
condition in which an energy-using
product is connected to a main power
source and offers one or more of the
following user-oriented or protective
functions: to facilitate the activation or
deactivation of other functions
(including active mode) by remote
switch (including remote control),
internal sensor, or timer; or continuous
functions, including information or
status displays (including clocks) or
sensor-based functions. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(1)(A)(iii))
‘‘Off mode’’ is defined as the condition
in which an energy-using product is
connected to a main power source and
is not providing any standby mode or
active mode function. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(1)(A)(ii))
During the September 2009 Public
Meeting, ASAP commented that the
definitions provided in IEC Standard
62301 do not conform to the statutory
definitions provided by EPCA, so ASAP
believed it was not entirely clear that
DOE should adopt the IEC definitions
word-for-word. (ASAP, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 7 at p. 19) 5
DOE notes that the EPCA definition of
standby mode differs from the one
provided in IEC Standard 62301, which
defines standby mode as the ‘‘lowest
power consumption mode which cannot
be switched off (influenced) by the user
and that may persist for an indefinite
time when an appliance is connected to
the main electricity supply and used in
accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.’’ However, DOE expects
significant changes to the mode
5 A notation in the form ‘‘ASAP, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 7 at p. 19’’ identifies an oral
comment that DOE received during the September
21, 2009, Framework public meeting, was recorded
in the public meeting transcript in the docket for
the clothes washer energy conservation standards
rulemaking (Docket No. EERE–2008–BT–STD–
0019), and is maintained in the Resource Room of
the Building Technologies Program. This particular
notation refers to a comment (1) made by ASAP
during the public meeting; (2) recorded in
document number 7, which is the public meeting
transcript that is filed in the docket of the clothes
washer energy conservation standards rulemaking;
and (3) which appears on page 19 of document
number 7.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
definitions included in IEC Standard
62301, based on review of IEC Standard
62301 FDIS. The definitions provided in
IEC Standard 62301 FDIS are likely to
be included in the final revised IEC
Standard 62301, Second Edition. DOE
considered the definitions provided by
IEC Standard 62301 FDIS as the most
current when determining the mode
definitions proposed to be included in
the test procedure.
EPCA authorizes DOE to amend mode
definitions, as appropriate, considering
the most current versions of IEC
Standards 62301 and 62087. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(1)(B)) DOE recognizes that the
EPCA definitions for active mode,
standby mode, and off mode were
developed to be broadly applicable for
many energy-using products. However,
for specific products with multiple
functions, these broad definitions could
be interpreted in different ways. For
these reasons, DOE proposes amending
the test procedure to include definitions
for these modes based on the definitions
provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS,
with added clarifications specific to
clothes washers.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Active Mode
DOE proposes to define active mode
as a mode in which the clothes washer
is connected to a mains power source;
has been activated; and is performing
one or more of the main functions of
washing, soaking, tumbling, agitating,
rinsing, and/or removing water from the
clothing, or is involved in functions
necessary for these main functions, such
as admitting water into the washer or
pumping water out of the washer. DOE
is proposing to refer to the typical
clothes washing operation (i.e., a
complete wash cycle intended for
washing a clothing load, including
washing, rinsing, and spinning) as the
active washing mode. DOE is aware of
three additional relevant modes that it
proposes to define as a part of active
mode: delay start mode, cycle finished
mode, and self-clean mode. DOE is
proposing to include these modes in the
measures of clothes washer energy
consumption, as discussed in section
III.C.4.
i. Delay Start Mode
DOE proposes to define delay start
mode as a mode in which activation of
the active washing mode is facilitated
by a timer. Because delay start mode is
not a mode that may persist for an
indefinite time, DOE believes it would
not be considered as part of a standby
mode based on the proposed definition
discussed below. DOE also notes that
IEC Standard 62301 Committee Draft 2
(IEC Standard 62301 CD2) provides the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
additional clarification that ‘‘delay start
mode is a one off user initiated short
duration function that is associated with
an active mode.’’ The subsequent IEC
Standard 62301 Committee Draft for
Vote (IEC Standard 62301 CDV) removes
this clarification; however, in response
to comments on IEC Standard 62301
CD2 that led to IEC Standard 62301
CDV, IEC states that delay start mode is
a one off function of limited duration.
DOE infers that delay start mode should
therefore be considered part of active
mode. DOE notes that IEC 62301 FDIS
classifies delay start as a secondary
function and therefore not part of active
mode. DOE continues to believe,
however, that because delay start is of
limited duration and is uniquely
associated with the initiation of a main
function (i.e., washing cycle), it should
be considered part of active mode. The
proposed methods for measuring energy
consumption in delay start mode are
discussed in III.C.3.
ii. Cycle Finished Mode
DOE proposes to define cycle finished
mode as a mode that provides
continuous status display following
operation in the active washing mode.
However, as with delay start mode,
cycle finished mode is not a mode that
may persist for an indefinite time, and
would therefore not be considered as a
part of standby mode. Additionally,
operation in cycle finished mode occurs
only after operation in the active
washing mode. DOE believes cycle
finished mode, similar to delay start
mode, would be considered a one off
short duration function that is
associated with an active mode. DOE is
therefore proposing to define cycle
finished mode as a part of active mode.
The proposed methods for measuring
energy consumption in cycle finished
mode are discussed in III.C.3.
DOE is aware that some clothes
washers currently available offer energyconsuming features in cycle finished
mode other than a continuous status
display. For example, certain models
may employ a low-power fan to
circulate air around the damp clothes to
prevent odors. These models may also
periodically tumble the clothes to
prevent wrinkles for up to 10 hours after
the completion of the wash cycle. These
functions, while enabled, would use
more energy than the continuous
display normally associated with cycle
finished mode. However, DOE does not
propose amending the test procedure to
address these specific cycle finished
mode functions, because DOE believes
measuring the energy use from these
functions would significantly increase
the test cycle duration to capture a
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57561
negligible contributor to annual energy
consumption. In addition, DOE research
indicates that only eight out of the 94
residential clothes washer models
currently produced by manufacturers
representing more than 92 percent of the
residential clothes washer market
incorporate such a circulation or
tumbling function. Because these
models are also higher priced and
recently introduced, DOE believes that
the shipment-weighted percentage of
residential clothes washers with a
circulation or tumbling function in
cycle finished mode is less than 5
percent. Therefore, DOE believes the
energy consumed by these features in
cycle finished mode represents a
negligible portion of the overall energy
consumption of clothes washers.
iii. Self-Clean Mode
DOE proposes to define self-clean
mode as a clothes washer operating
mode that:
• Is dedicated to cleaning,
deodorizing, or sanitizing the clothes
washer by eliminating sources of odor,
bacteria, mold, and mildew;
• Is recommended to be run
intermittently by the manufacturer; and
• Is separate from clothes washing
cycles.
Self-clean mode is considered a part
of the active mode because it is a
function necessary for the main
functions associated with washing
clothes. A clothes washer with
excessive bacteria, mildew, or odor
cannot effectively wash clothes. A
further discussion of self-clean mode,
including its incorporation in the
clothes washer test procedure, is
included in section III.D.1.b.
Standby Mode
DOE proposes to define standby mode
as any mode in which the clothes
washer is connected to a mains power
source and offers one or more of the
following user-oriented or protective
functions which may persist for an
indefinite time: 6
• Facilitation of the activation of
other modes (including activation or
deactivation of active mode) by remote
6 The actual language for the standby mode
definition in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS describes
‘‘* * *user oriented or protective functions which
usually persist’’ rather than ‘‘* * * user oriented or
protective functions which may persist for an
indefinite time.’’ DOE notes, however, that section
5.1 of IEC Standard 62301 FDIS states that ‘‘a mode
is considered to be persistent where the power level
is constant or where there are several power levels
that occur in a regular sequence for an indefinite
period of time.’’ DOE believes that the proposed
language, which was originally included in IEC
Standard 62301 CD2, encompasses the possible
scenarios foreseen by section 5.1 of IEC Standard
62301 FDIS without unnecessary specificity.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57562
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
switch (including remote control),
internal sensor, or timer;
• Continuous function: Information
or status displays including clocks; and
• Continuous function: Sensor-based
functions.
DOE proposes adding a clarification
of what would be considered a timer
under this definition of standby mode.
DOE would clarify that a timer is a
continuous clock function (which may
or may not be associated with a display)
that provides regular scheduled tasks
(e.g., switching) and that operates on a
continuous basis. As noted earlier in
this section, this proposed definition
was developed based on the definition
provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS.
It expands on the EPCA mode definition
to provide additional clarifications as to
which functions are associated with
standby mode.
The proposed definition of standby
mode based on IEC Standard 62301
FDIS allows for multiple modes to be
considered a standby mode. DOE has
identified only one mode that would be
considered a standby mode under the
proposed definition. DOE proposes to
define this ‘‘inactive mode’’ as a standby
mode that facilitates the activation of
active mode by remote switch
(including remote control), internal
sensor, or timer, or that provides
continuous status display. DOE
proposes amending the test procedure
for clothes washers to include
provisions for measuring energy use in
inactive mode as the measurement of
standby energy use. Although it
identified only this one particular
standby mode, DOE remains open to
consideration of additional standby
modes.
Off Mode
As discussed in section III.C.1, DOE
proposes in today’s NOPR to amend the
DOE test procedure for clothes washers
to define ‘‘off mode’’ as any mode in
which the clothes washer is connected
to a mains power source and is not
providing any standby mode or active
mode function and the mode may
persist for an indefinite time. An
indicator that only shows the user that
the product is in the off position is
included within the off mode
classification. As noted in section
III.C.1, this definition was developed
based on the definitions provided in IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS. It expands on the
EPCA mode definitions to provide
additional clarifications as to which
functions are associated with off mode.
Under the proposed definitions, a
clothes washer equipped with a
mechanical on/off switch that can
disconnect power to the display and/or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
control components would be
considered as operating in the off mode
when the switch is in the ‘‘off’’ position,
provided that no other standby or active
mode functions are energized. An
energized light-emitting diode (LED) or
other indicator that only shows the user
that the product is in the off position
would be considered part of off mode
under the proposed definition, again
provided that no other standby or active
mode functions are energized. As stated
above, however, if any energy is
consumed by the appliance in the
presence of a one-way remote control,
the unit would be operating in standby
mode under the proposed definition.
That definition would include remote
controls that facilitate the activation or
deactivation of other functions
(including active mode) as a feature of
standby mode.
IEC Standard 62301 FDIS also
provides definitions for additional
modes that DOE determined are not
applicable to the clothes washer test
procedure. Section 3.7 of IEC Standard
62301 FDIS defines network mode as a
mode category that includes ‘‘any
product modes where the energy using
product is connected to a mains power
source and at least one network function
is activated (such as reactivation via
network command or network integrity
communication) but where the primary
function is not active.’’ IEC Standard
62301 FDIS also provides a note, stating
that ‘‘[w]here a network function is
provided but is not active and/or not
connected to a network, then this mode
is not applicable. A network function
could become active intermittently
according to a fixed schedule or in
response to a network requirement. A
‘network’ in this context includes
communication between two or more
separate independently powered
devices or products. A network does not
include one or more controls which are
dedicated to a single product. Network
mode may include one or more standby
functions.’’ As discussed further in
section III.D.1.c, DOE is not proposing
any amendments to include provisions
for testing network mode energy
consumption in clothes washers.
DOE also notes that section 3.9 of IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS provides a
definition of ‘‘disconnected mode’’,
which is ‘‘the state where all
connections to mains power sources of
the energy using product are removed or
interrupted.’’ IEC Standard 62301 FDIS
also adds a note that common terms
such as ‘‘unplugged’’ or ‘‘cut off from
mains’’ also describe this mode and that
this mode is not part of the lower power
mode category. DOE believes that there
would be no energy use in a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
disconnected mode, and therefore, is
not proposing a definition or testing
methods for such a mode in the DOE
test procedure for clothes washers.
DOE welcomes comment on the
proposed establishment of the modes as
discussed above, including inactive
mode as the only standby mode for
clothes washers. DOE also invites
comment on the determination that
delay start mode and cycle finished
mode would be considered part of
active mode. DOE further invites
comment on the proposed mode
definitions, including the definition of
self-clean mode, and whether there are
any modes that have not been identified
in this NOPR that represent significant
energy use and are consistent with the
proposed active mode, standby mode, or
off mode definitions.
3. Adding Specifications for the Test
Methods and Measurements for Standby
Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active
Mode Testing
This section discusses the provisions
DOE proposes to include in the test
procedure to clarify the IEC Standard
62301 methods when used to measure
standby mode and off mode energy use
in clothes washers. These proposed
procedures also include provisions for
measuring energy use in delay start
mode and cycle finished mode.
Although these modes are considered a
part of active mode under the proposed
definitions, the methods for measuring
their associated energy consumptions
are similar to those used for standby
mode and off mode.
Paragraph 5.3.1 of section 5.3 of IEC
Standard 62301 contains provisions for
measuring power. It specifies, for
products in which the power is stable
(i.e., power varies by not more than 5
percent from a maximum level during a
period of 5 minutes), waiting at least 5
minutes for the product to stabilize and
then measuring the power at the end of
an additional time period of not less
than 5 minutes. Paragraph 5.3.2
contains provisions for measuring
average power in cases where the power
is not stable (i.e., power varies by more
than 5 percent from a maximum level
during a period of 5 minutes). In such
cases, IEC Standard 62301 requires a
measurement period of no less than 5
minutes, or one or more complete
operating cycles of several minutes or
hours. DOE notes these provisions do
not preclude manufacturers from testing
products with a longer stabilization
period, or a longer measurement period
(if the power varies by not more than 5
percent or if that period represents one
or more complete cycles).
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Displays on residential clothes
washers may reduce power
consumption by dimming or turning off
after a certain period of user inactivity
(‘‘automatic power-down’’). For clothes
washers whose power input in standby,
off, and cycle finished modes varies in
this manner during testing, DOE
proposes that the test be conducted after
the power level has dropped to its
lowest level, as discussed in IEC
Standard 62301, section 5,
(‘‘Measurements’’), paragraph 5.1,
‘‘General,’’ Note 1. DOE is aware that IEC
Standard 62301 does not provide
guidance on how long to wait for the
appliance to drop to the lower-power
state. DOE observed during tests of 17
residential clothes washers that in units
with an automatic power-down feature
the higher-power state persists for less
than 10 minutes of inactivity after the
display has been energized. Thus, the
energy consumption at the low-power
level is most representative of standby
mode, off mode, and cycle finished
mode power. However, DOE notes the
test sample of 17 clothes washers was
relatively small. It is possible that some
clothes washers may remain in the
higher-power state for the duration of a
5-minute stabilization period and 5minute measurement period, and then
drop to the lower-power state that is
more representative of standby mode,
off mode, or cycle finished mode. In
contrast, IEC Standard 62301 CDV
specifies for each testing method that
the product be allowed to stabilize for
at least 30 minutes prior to a
measurement period of not less than 10
minutes. DOE believes this method
would allow sufficient time for displays
that automatically dim or power down
after a period of user inactivity to reach
the lower-power state prior to
measurement. Based on the automatic
power-down time periods observed in
its own testing, DOE believes that the
IEC Standard 62301 CDV 30-minute
stabilization and 10-minute
measurement periods provide a clearer
and more consistent testing procedure
than the corresponding time periods
specified in IEC Standard 62301. Those
periods allow for representative
measurements to be made among
products that may have varying time
periods before the power drops to a
lower level more representative of
standby, off, or cycle finished mode.
DOE notes that IEC Standard 62301
FDIS establishes an overall test period
of not less than 15 minutes for products
in which power consumption in the
mode being tested is not cyclic. Data
collected during the first third of the
total period is discarded (and thus this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
time could be inferred to be a
stabilization period), and data from the
remaining two-thirds of the total period
are used to determine whether the
power is stable. If stability is not
achieved, the total period is extended
continuously until the stability criteria
are achieved, to a maximum of 3 hours.
Modes that are known to be non-cyclic
and of varying power consumption shall
follow this same procedure, but with a
total test period not less than 60
minutes. If power consumption in a
mode is cyclic, measurements must be
conducted with an initial operation
period (analogous to a stabilization
period) of at least 10 minutes, and the
average power measured over at least
four complete cycles. The measurement
period must be at least 20 minutes. DOE
believes that the specifications provided
in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS would not
produce power consumption
measurements as accurate, repeatable,
and enforceable as the specifications
provided in IEC Standard 62301 CDV.
Therefore, DOE proposes to require that:
(1) the product be allowed to stabilize
for at least 30 minutes, then (2) the
power measurement be made for a
period not less than 10 minutes for
inactive, off, and cycle finished modes.
DOE’s test procedures are developed
to measure representative energy use for
the typical consumer, and cannot
capture all possible consumer actions
and appliance usage patterns that might
increase energy use. For example,
certain residential clothes washer
models featuring a display power-down
may allow consumers to alter the
display settings to increase the amount
of time in the high-power state, or to
make the high-power state permanent.
Because DOE does not have information
regarding the likelihood consumer will
alter the default display settings, DOE
has not proposed additional provisions
in today’s NOPR to address the
possibility of increased energy use as a
result of consumers adjusting the
display power-down settings or other
features. DOE welcomes comment on
the suitability of using the default
settings in testing standby energy
consumption. It also welcomes
comment on any methodologies that can
account for consumer actions that might
increase energy use, and requests data
on the repeatability of such testing
procedures.
DOE understands that clothes washers
with a delay start capability may use
varying amounts of power during delay
start mode, depending on the delay time
entered, the amount of remaining delay
time displayed, and/or display
indication of mode status. To ensure
comparable and valid results, DOE
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57563
proposes to include in its clothes
washer test procedure a specification for
the delay start time to be set at 5 hours,
and for power to be monitored for 60
minutes after waiting at least 5 minutes
for power input to stabilize. In
determining the specification for delay
start parameters, DOE considered the
possibility that display power input
would depend on the time displayed,
which is typically the time in hours
remaining before the start. Displays may
be one or two digits. Some two-digit
displays may show whole numbers for
remaining delay hours of 10 or more
and both the ones and tenths digits for
the remaining delay hours of 9.9 or less.
DOE analyzed the number of LEDs
activated in LED displays of the
remaining hours over a range of delay
times. It concluded that the average
number of LEDs lit for the range of all
possible delay times would be best
approximated by determining the
average number of LEDs lit for either
single-digit or two-digit displays in a 60minute test if the delay time is set at 5
hours. DOE welcomes comment on this
approach to measuring delay start mode.
DOE is also proposing that test room
ambient temperatures for standby mode
and off mode testing, as well as delay
start mode and cycle finished mode
testing, be specified for all clothes
washers according to section 4,
paragraph 4.2 of IEC Standard 62301.
The current DOE test procedure
includes a test room ambient air
temperature specification only for
water-heating clothes washers, for
which the requirement is 75 ± 5 degrees
Fahrenheit (°F). This falls within the
range specified by IEC Standard 62301
of 73.4 ± 9 °F. Today’s proposed test
procedure would allow manufacturers
of water-heating clothes washers to use
the more stringent ambient temperature
range in the current DOE test procedure
if tests of active washing mode
performance and standby, off, delay
start, and cycle finished mode power are
conducted simultaneously in the same
room on multiple clothes washers.
Alternatively, the proposed temperature
specifications taken from IEC Standard
62301 would allow a manufacturer that
opts to conduct standby, off, delay start,
and cycle finished mode testing
separately from active washing mode
testing more latitude in maintaining
ambient conditions. DOE requests
comment on the appropriateness of this
proposed modified test room ambient
temperature range.
4. Calculation of Energy Use Associated
With Each Operating Mode
To combine active washing mode
energy consumption with energy
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57564
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
consumption from inactive, off, and
additional active modes (delay start,
cycle finished, and self-clean modes),
DOE estimated the representative energy
use for each of these modes. The total
energy consumption in each of these
modes depends on both the power level
of that mode and the time spent in that
mode. This section discusses the
approach DOE proposes for calculating
energy use associated with each
operating mode for clothes washers and
the numbers of hours proposed to be
associated with each mode.
Energy use for clothes washers is
expressed in terms of ft 3 of wash load
capacity per total energy use per wash
cycle.7 As discussed further in section
III.E.2, DOE has tentatively determined
that it is technically feasible to integrate
measures of standby mode and off mode
energy use into the overall energy use
metric, as required by the EISA 2007
amendments to EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) Therefore, DOE has
examined standby mode and off mode
power consumption in terms of annual
energy use apportioned on a per-cycle
basis. DOE has also examined energy
consumption from delay start, cycle
finished, and self-clean modes on a percycle basis. Energy used during an
active washing mode test cycle is
directly measured in the current DOE
test procedure, and a weighted average
is calculated under different load sizes,
fill levels, and wash temperature
conditions according to the specific
machine’s capacity and features. (See
section 4.1 of appendix J1 of subpart B
of 10 CFR 430 for details.) The
calculation of MEF also includes
nominal energy used by a water heater
to heat the water supplied to the clothes
washer, and by a dryer to remove the
remaining moisture after the clothes
washer completes its full cycle
(weighted by a dryer usage factor (DUF)
to account for loads not dried in a
clothes dryer).
Average cycle times can vary
significantly based on the axis of basket
rotation and type of load. One 1997
study compared a 37-minute normal
cycle for a vertical-axis, top-loading
clothes washer with 40 to 110-minute
cycles for eight different front-loading,
horizontal-axis machines.8 The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
reported in 2005 on three studies in the
7 See
section III.C.5 for a detailed description of
how the efficiency metric is calculated.
8 J. Dieckmann, D. Westphalen. 1997. ‘‘Laboratory
Testing of Clothes Washers.’’ The High-Efficiency
Laundry Metering and Market Analysis (THELMA).
Volume 2. Final Report to the Electric Power
Research Institute (EPRI). Report No. TR–109147–
V2. December 29, 1997. Available for purchase at
https://www.epri.com.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
magazine ‘‘Consumer Reports’’ 9 that
determined top-loading clothes washers
have ‘‘normal’’ cycle times of 37–55
minutes, and front-loading washers
have ‘‘normal’’ cycle times of 51–105
minutes.10 Therefore, DOE proposes to
adopt the estimate of 1 hour per cycle
associated with a residential clothes
washer’s typical active washing mode
(i.e., a complete wash cycle including
washing, rinsing, and spinning). DOE is
proposing a single cycle duration for
both top-loading and front-loading
clothes washers rather than more
accurate cycle times specific to each
product class to simplify the test
procedure and calculations.
Additionally, proposing cycle times for
each product class would have an
insignificant effect on the calculations
proposed in the test procedure because
it is used only to allocate the number of
annual hours associated with inactive/
off mode. For example, using cycle
times of 45 minutes for top-loaders and
75 minutes for front-loaders would
change the number of hours allocated to
inactive/off mode (the only modes
affected by the number of active mode
hours) by less than 1 percent.
In the January 2001 final rule, 66 FR
3314, DOE estimated the representative
number of annual wash cycles per
clothes washer as 392. DOE is proposing
to update the number of wash cycles per
year from 392 to 295 to reflect more
current consumer behavior, which is
discussed in detail in section III.D.2.a.
One hour per cycle would result in a
total of 295 hours per year associated
with active mode. DOE is proposing to
associate the remaining 8,465 (8,760
minus 295) hours of the year with all
modes other than the active washing
mode.
DOE is aware of five modes other than
active washing mode in which
residential clothes washers use energy:
(1) Inactive mode, (2) cycle finished
mode, (3) delay start mode, (4) off mode,
and (5) self-clean mode. DOE is aware
of only limited studies of the time
clothes washers spend in these different
modes. One household survey
conducted by the National Appliance
and Equipment Energy Efficiency
Committee (NAEEEC) in Australia in
2000, for example, measured the time
associated with different modes for 61
9 These studies appeared in the July 1998, July
1999, and August 2000 issues of Consumer Reports.
10 C. Wilkes et al. 2005. ‘‘Quantification of
Exposure-Related Water Uses for Various U.S.
Subpopulations.’’ U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Research and Development.
Report No. EPA/600/R–06/003. Washington, DC.
December 2005. Available at https://
www.wilkestech.com/
205edrb06_Final_Water_Use_Report.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
clothes washers with an average age of
9 years. The daily time spent in each
mode in this study averaged 1 hour for
washing (active washing mode), zero
time for delay start and ‘‘active standby’’
modes, and the remaining time split 20
percent for ‘‘end of program’’ mode and
80 percent for off mode.11 Self-clean
mode was not explicitly addressed. The
active standby mode of the washers in
this study is equivalent to the inactive
mode defined in section III.C.2 of this
notice, and the end of program mode is
equivalent to cycle finished mode.
The average age of the clothes
washers in the study suggests that many
of them have electromechanical rather
than electronic controls, and thus would
not likely have been capable of inactive
mode. Hence, DOE does not infer from
those results that more modern clothes
washers spend negligible time in
inactive mode. DOE believes that
because current clothes washer models
offer both mechanical and electronic
controls, the time apportioned to off
mode in this study would actually be
split between off mode and inactive
mode. Clothes washers with
electromechanical controllers can have
a delayed start feature, although its
implementation appears to be marketspecific. Markets with a long history of
residential time-of-day electricity
pricing are more likely to have
appliances with delayed start features
than in markets where household
electricity prices are constant. The
clothes washers in the NAEEEC study
would have been less likely to have a
delay start mode because differential
power pricing is a relatively recent
development in the Australian
residential power market. Thus, the
findings in the Australian clothes
washer study regarding delayed start are
inconclusive regarding the time current
models of clothes washers spend in
delay start mode.
To help address this uncertainty, DOE
examined a more recent 2005 Australian
study that noted a small number of
usage hours associated with delay start
mode. This study used dataloggers to
monitor time clothes washers spent in
different modes in Australia and New
Zealand. The study showed that the
average amount of time spent in delay
start mode per wash cycle was
approximately 5 minutes.12 DOE
11 Australia’s National Appliance and Equipment
Energy Efficiency Committee (NAEEEC). Standby
Product Profile—Clothes Washers. October 2003.
Available at https://www.energyrating.gov.au/
library/pubs/sb200308-washers.pdf.
12 Australian Electrical and Electronic
Manufacturer’s Association. A Submission to
NAEEEC on Mode Times for Use When Determining
Standby Energy Consumption of Clothes Washers,
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57565
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
expects similar low usage patterns of
delayed start functionality for clothes
washers in U.S. households because
DOE research suggests that most U.S.
residential electricity customers have
fixed-rate electricity pricing (i.e., the
cost of electricity does not change with
time of day, day of week, or time of
year). However, delayed start
functionality usage could increase in the
United States as more electric utilities
offer residential customers variable-rate
pricing plans that encourage shifting
electricity consumption to off-peak
hours.
DOE welcomes comment on whether
the sources cited provide a reasonable
indication of residential clothes washer
mode usage patterns, and also welcomes
any additional information about such
usage patterns.
Based on these two studies, DOE
concludes that a typical modern
residential clothes washer spends a
small amount of time in delay start
mode. Using an estimated 5 minutes per
cycle, the total annual amount of time
spent in delay start mode, using the
proposed representative 295 cycles per
year, is 25 hours.
The NAEEEC study suggests that 20
percent of the total use cycle time not
allocated to active washing or delay
start mode would be associated with
cycle finished mode. However, DOE
testing of multiple residential clothes
washers showed that the time spent in
a cycle finished mode per use cycle is
very short. Several models tested had no
cycle finished mode, and immediately
reverted to off/inactive mode after the
wash cycle completed. All of the tested
units with cycle finished mode
remained in that state for less than 5
minutes before switching back to off/
inactive mode. Based on these results,
DOE is proposing to allocate 3 minutes
per average use cycle to cycle finished
mode, for a total of 15 hours per year.
In addition, DOE is aware that some
residential clothes washers offer a selfclean mode, as further discussed in
section III.D.1.b. These self-clean cycles
are not accounted for in the proposed
295 active mode washing hours per
year. DOE tested seven machines that
had these cycles, and found an average
self-clean cycle time of 1.3 hours. DOE
proposes to account for the time spent
in self-cleaning cycles, if applicable,
based on an estimated average
manufacturer recommendation of 12
self-clean cycles per year, resulting in
16 hours per year. Therefore, machines
offering a self-cleaning cycle will spend
16 fewer hours per year in standby
mode or off mode.
In summary, DOE is proposing to
allocate 295 hours per year to the active
washing mode, 16 hours to self-clean
mode (if applicable), 25 hours to delay
start mode, 15 hours to cycle finished
mode, and the remainder (8,409 hours
for clothes washers offering other
modes) to off and/or inactive mode.
Table III.1 presents DOE’s estimate of
the annual energy use associated with
all modes for a clothes washer that is
capable of each of these functions. The
approximate ranges of power associated
with the different modes are based on
DOE testing of residential clothes
washers with the exception of active
washing mode, as noted below. Where
ranges of average power are listed, the
highest and lowest average measured
values for both top- and front-loading
clothes washers are provided. Active
washing mode annual energy use is
calculated based on the proposed 295
cycles per year in a standard-size, toploading or front-loading clothes washer.
Active washing mode per-cycle energy
use is determined from a 2006 study
that referenced data provided in 2005 by
the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (AHAM) and Whirlpool
Corporation (Whirlpool).13 This study
estimated that, in 2005, average percycle energy use was 2.23 kWh for a
typical residential clothes washer in the
United States with an average MEF of
1.37 and a capacity of 3.06 ft 3.
TABLE III.1—ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL ENERGY USE OF RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES WASHER MODES
Mode
Hours
Active Washing .........................................................
Self-Clean ..................................................................
Delay Start ................................................................
Cycle Finished ...........................................................
Off and Inactive .........................................................
295
16
25
15
* 8,409
Typical average power W
Annual energy use kWh
2,230 ...........................................................
75 to 2,081 ..................................................
1.4 to 8.9 .....................................................
0 to 5.2 ........................................................
0 to 1.7 ........................................................
** 657.9.
† 1.2 to 33.3
0.04 to 0.2.
0 to 0.08.
0 to 14.3.
* Remaining
time = 8,760 ¥ 295 ¥ 16 ¥ 25 ¥ 15 = 8409.
energy consumption for water heating and moisture removal in the dryer as well as machine electrical energy consumption.
† Based on DOE testing of seven units with self-clean cycles, and 12 cycles per year. Values include energy consumption for water heating
and machine electrical energy consumption.
** Includes
To determine the annual hours per
mode for clothes washers that do not
utilize all possible modes, DOE
estimated values based upon
reallocating the hours for modes that are
not present to off/inactive modes. Table
III.2 summarizes the allocation of hours
to different possible modes under each
scenario.
TABLE III.2—ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL HOURS OF POSSIBLE CLOTHES WASHER MODES
All modes
possible
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Mode
No delay start
mode
No cycle finished
mode
No delay start or
cycle finished
modes
295
25
0
8,440
295
0
0
8,465
No Self-Clean Available
Active Washing ................................................................................
Delay Start .......................................................................................
Cycle Finished .................................................................................
Off and Inactive ...............................................................................
Dishwashers, and Dryers. Appendix B. March 11,
2005. Available at https://www.aeema.asn.au/
ArticleDocuments/258/standby.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
295
25
15
8,425
13 R. Bole. Life-Cycle Optimization of Residential
Clothes Washer Replacement. Center for
Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
295
0
15
8,450
Report. No. CSS06–03. Appendix C. April 21, 2006.
Available at css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS0603.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57566
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE III.2—ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL HOURS OF POSSIBLE CLOTHES WASHER MODES—Continued
All modes
possible
Mode
No delay start
mode
No cycle finished
mode
No delay start or
cycle finished
modes
295
16
25
0
8,424
295
16
0
0
8,449
Self-Clean Available
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Active Washing ................................................................................
Self-Clean ........................................................................................
Delay Start .......................................................................................
Cycle Finished .................................................................................
Off and Inactive ...............................................................................
DOE believes the proposed definition
of off mode as applied to residential
clothes washers refers to units with
mechanical rather than electronic
controls, or units with electronic
controls combined with a mechanical
switch with which the user can deenergize the electronic controls.
Reactivation of the clothes washer with
a pushbutton sensor, touch sensor, or
other similar device that consumes
power is considered to be a standby
mode feature under the proposed
definition. DOE believes there are few
clothes washers with electronic controls
that have an additional mechanical on/
off switch. Therefore, the combined
inactive/off hours would most likely be
allocated fully either to inactive mode
or off mode, depending on the type of
controls present on the clothes washer.
DOE does not have market share
information to determine how many
residential clothes washers are currently
shipped with electromechanical
controls. For clothes washers with
electronic controls plus a mechanical
on/off switch, DOE is proposing to
allocate half of the inactive/off hours
each to inactive and off modes. DOE
welcomes comment and additional
information on this point.
In conclusion, DOE is proposing to
calculate residential clothes washer
energy use per cycle associated with
inactive, off, delay start, and cycle
finished modes by (1) Calculating the
product of wattage and allocated hours
for all possible inactive, off, delay start
and cycle finished modes; (2) summing
the results; (3) dividing the sum by
1,000 to convert from Wh to kWh; and
(4) dividing by the proposed 295 use
cycles per year. DOE is also proposing
to calculate energy use per cycle
associated with self-clean mode, if
available, by (1) multiplying the energy
use per self-clean cycle in kWh by 12
(the number of self-clean cycles
estimated per year); and (2) dividing by
the proposed 295 use cycles per year.
DOE invites comments on this
proposed methodology and associated
factors, including accuracy, allocation of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
295
16
25
15
8,409
annual hours, and test burden. DOE may
also consider the following alternative
methodology based on comments
received:
The comparison of annual energy use
of different clothes washer modes shows
that delay start and cycle finished
modes represent a relatively small
number of hours at low power
consumption levels. For clothes washers
currently on the market, these levels are
distinct from, but comparable to, those
for off/inactive modes. Thus, DOE could
adopt an approach that would be
limited to specifying hours for only off
and inactive modes when calculating
energy use. In that case, all of the hours
not associated with active washing
mode or self-clean mode (8,465 hours
total) would be allocated to the inactive
and off modes. DOE invites comment on
whether such an alternative would be
representative of the power
consumption of clothes washers
currently on the market.
5. Measures of Energy Consumption
The DOE test procedure for clothes
washers currently incorporates various
measures of per-cycle energy
consumption including total weighted
per-cycle hot water energy consumption
(for electric-, gas-, or oil-heated water),
total weighted per-cycle machine
electrical energy consumption, and percycle energy consumption for removing
moisture from a test load in a dryer. (See
sections 4.1 and 4.3 of appendix J1 of
subpart B of 10 CFR 430 for details.) The
test procedure also provides a
calculation for MEF, which is equal to
the clothes container capacity in ft3
divided by the sum, expressed in kWh,
of the total weighted per-cycle hot water
energy consumption, the total weighted
per-cycle machine electrical energy
consumption, and the per-cycle energy
consumption for removing moisture
from a test load. (See section 4.4 of
appendix J1 of subpart B of 10 CFR 430
for details.) The current Federal energy
conservation standards for clothes
washers are expressed in MEF. (10 CFR
430.32(g)(3)).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
295
16
0
15
8,434
In response to the August 2009
framework document, Whirlpool
commented that DOE should
incorporate standby power into the MEF
calculation, and that standby power
should not be accounted for separately.
(Whirlpool, No. 21 at p. 2) Additionally,
the Joint Comment and ASE commented
that DOE should integrate standby and
no-load mode power into a single
energy metric based on the revisions to
IEC Standard 62301. (Joint Comment,
No. 14 at p. 1; ASE, No. 22 at p. 1).
Under 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A), EPCA
directs that the ‘‘[t]est procedures for all
covered products shall be amended
pursuant to section 323 to include
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption * * * with such energy
consumption integrated into the overall
energy efficiency, energy consumption,
or other energy descriptor for each
covered product, unless the Secretary
determines that—(i) the current test
procedures for a covered product
already fully account for and
incorporate the standby mode and off
mode energy consumption of the
covered product; or (ii) such an
integrated test procedure is technically
infeasible for a particular covered
product, in which case the Secretary
shall prescribe a separate standby mode
and off mode energy use test procedure
for the covered product, if technically
feasible.’’
DOE proposes to establish the
following measure of energy
consumption for clothes washers. It
integrates energy use of standby mode
and off, modes with the energy use of
the product’s main functions, including
delay start and cycle finished modes as
well as any self-clean function available.
DOE would define a ‘‘per-cycle standby,
off, delay start and cycle finished mode
energy consumption,’’ and a ‘‘per-cycle
self-clean mode energy consumption’’
measure, as applicable, expressed in
kWh. DOE would also define integrated
modified energy factor (IMEF) as the
clothes container capacity in ft3 divided
by the sum, expressed in kWh, of:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
• The total weighted per-cycle hot
water energy consumption;
• The total weighted per-cycle
machine electrical energy consumption;
• The per-cycle energy consumption
for removing moisture from a test load;
• The per-cycle standby, off, delay
start and cycle finished mode energy
consumption; and
• The per-cycle self-clean mode
energy consumption, as applicable
(discussed in III.D.1.b).
DOE proposes an amended clothes
washer test procedure, appendix J2 to
subpart B of 10 CFR part 430, to include
the measurement of the energy
consumption in these additional modes
and the calculation of IMEF.
DOE does not propose to amend the
estimated annual operating cost
calculation in 10 CFR 430.23 to include
the cost of energy consumed in the nonactive washing modes because:
• DOE believes that the cost of energy
consumed in self-clean, standby, off,
delay start, and cycle finished modes is
small relative to the total annual energy
cost for clothes washers and, therefore,
would make little difference in the
estimated annual operating cost
calculation; and
• The Federal Trade Commission’s
(FTC’s) EnergyGuide Label for clothes
washers includes as its primary
indicator of product energy efficiency
the estimated annual operating cost,
compared to a range of annual operating
costs of similar products. Appendix F1
to 16 CFR part 305. An estimated annual
operating cost incorporating self-clean,
standby, off, delay start, and cycle
finished mode energy use would no
longer be directly comparable to the
minimum and maximum energy costs
prescribed for the EnergyGuide Label.
D. Clothes Washer Active Mode Test
Procedure
1. Technologies Not Covered by the
Current Clothes Washer Test Procedure
a. Steam Wash Cycles
Multiple clothes washer models
currently available on the market offer
a steam function via pre-set cycles or as
an optional addition to conventional
wash cycles. During these cycles, steam
is injected into the basket, which
manufacturers claim provides enhanced
cleaning and/or sterilization. The steam
is produced in a generator that requires
a significant amount of energy to heat
and vaporize the water. The current
clothes washer test procedure does not
account for energy or water
consumption during this type of wash
cycle.
57567
In response to the August 2009
framework document, DOE received
comments from the Joint Comment and
ASE supporting revisions to the test
procedure to measure energy and water
consumption during steam wash cycles.
(Joint Comment, No. 14 at p. 3; ASE, No.
22 at p. 1).
The current clothes washer test
procedure specifies methods for
measuring energy and water
consumption over a range of wash
temperatures based on the temperature
selections available on a clothes washer,
as specified in Table 3.2 of the test
procedure, Test Section Reference. DOE
proposes amending the test procedure to
include an additional measurement of
energy and water consumption during a
steam wash cycle for clothes washers
offering this feature, included in section
3.9. In the proposed amendments, Table
3.2 of the test procedure is updated to
include a column that specifies the test
sections to be followed for clothes
washers offering a steam wash cycle, to
update the footnotes, and to correct an
error in the current organization of the
table. The test sections required for
clothes washers without a steam wash
cycle would remain unchanged. The
proposed updated Table 3.2 from the
test procedure is shown below as table
III.3.
TABLE III.3—TEST SECTION REFERENCE
≤135 °F (57.2 °C)
Max. wash temp. available
Number of wash temp. selections
** >135 °F (57.2 °C)
1
Test Sections Required to be Followed ..................................................
2
>2
3
....................
....................
....................
3.6
....................
3.8
....................
....................
3.4
....................
3.6
....................
3.8
....................
....................
3.4
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
....................
3.3
....................
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
† 3.9
>3
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
† 3.9
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
** Only applicable to machines with a warm wash/warm rinse cycle.
** Only applicable to water heating clothes washers on which the maximum wash temperature available exceeds 135 °F (57.2 °C)
† Only applicable to machines equipped with a steam wash cycle.
DOE also proposes to include the
energy and water consumption from
steam wash cycles in the final
calculations for the energy and water
use metrics. For clothes washers capable
of steam wash cycles, the measurements
of energy and water consumption from
the steam wash cycle with the hottest
wash temperature would be included in
the overall energy and water use
calculations based on the temperature
use factor (TUF) for steam wash. Table
4.1.1 of the test procedure specifies the
current weight given to the
consumption measurements for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
different wash cycles. DOE believes
extra hot and steam cycles would be
reserved for the most heavily soiled
loads, and would have similar use
factors. However, DOE has tentatively
assumed that the steam wash cycles
would be selected somewhat fewer
times than the extra hot cycle because
on some models steam is available only
as an option on certain settings. DOE is
proposing to update Table 4.1.1 to
include 0.02 as the TUF of a steam wash
cycle, when available. Although DOE
lacks data on consumer use of steam
wash cycles, DOE believes these cycles
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
would decrease the use of extra hot
cycles, but would leave the use of hot,
warm, and cold cycles unchanged. DOE
therefore believes the 0.02 TUF
associated with steam washes would
correspond to a 0.02 decrease in the
current TUFs associated with extra hot
cycles, from 0.05 to 0.03 or 0.14 to 0.12,
for a steam-capable clothes washer
Table III.4 below shows the proposed
Table 4.1.1, including specifications for
a steam wash cycle, and updated warm
rinse TUFs, as discussed below in
section III.D.2.c.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57568
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE III.4—TEMPERATURE USE FACTORS
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
>135 °F
(57.2 °C)
>135 °F
(57.2 °C)
Steam
Steam
Single
Max wash temp available
2 Temps
> 2 Temps
3 Temps
> 3 Temps
3 Temps
> 3 Temps
Number wash temp selections
TUFs (steam) ............................................
TUFm (extra hot) ......................................
TUFh (hot) ................................................
TUFww (warm/warm) ................................
TUFw (warm) ............................................
TUFc (cold) ...............................................
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.00
NA
NA
0.63
NA
NA
0.37
NA
NA
0.14
* 0.27
0.22
0.37
NA
0.14
NA
* 0.27
0.22
0.37
NA
0.05
0.09
* 0.27
0.22
0.37
0.02
0.12
NA
* 0.27
0.22
0.37
0.02
0.03
0.09
* 0.27
0.22
0.37
* Only applicable to machines offering a warm/warm cycle. For machines with no warm/warm cycle, this value would be zero and the warm/
cold TUF should be increased by 0.27.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
DOE requests comment on the
following issues: Whether the energy
and water consumption of a steam wash
cycle should be included in the test
procedure; whether the proposed TUF
associated with steam wash cycles is
appropriate; and whether any data are
available regarding consumer usage
patterns of such cycles.
b. Self-Clean Cycles
Many residential clothes washers
currently on the market offer a self-clean
cycle. These cycles are used
periodically with bleach and/or
detergent but no clothes load to clean,
deodorize, or sanitize the components
that come into contact with water by
preventing or eliminating mold,
bacteria, and mildew. Self-clean cycles
may require higher water temperatures
and greater volumes of water than a
normal cycle, and therefore potentially
consume a substantial amount of
energy. The current test procedure does
not account for energy or water
consumption attributable to self-clean
cycles.
In response to the August 2009
framework document, DOE received
comments from the Joint Comment and
ASE recommending that DOE amend
the test procedure to account for energy
and water consumption from these
periodic cleansing or sanitizing cycles.
According to both commenters, the test
procedure should also be amended to
credit clothes washer designs that
address mold and odor issues without
the use of periodic sanitizing cycles.
(Joint Comment, No. 14 at p. 3; ASE, No.
22 at p. 1).
In its research, DOE noted that many
clothes washer user manuals include a
recommendation for how frequently the
consumer should run a self-clean cycle.
DOE observed that the manufacturerrecommended frequency typically is
once a month. Some manufacturers also
recommend a cleaning cycle every
certain number of wash cycles. DOE
believes that these self-clean cycles are
not accounted for in the proposed 295
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
wash cycles per year. Because these
cycles may consume a significant
amount of energy and water, DOE is
proposing to include them in the
calculation of the efficiency metric.
DOE is proposing to define a ‘‘selfclean mode’’ as a clothes washer
operating mode that:
• Is dedicated to cleaning,
deodorizing, or sanitizing the clothes
washer by eliminating sources of odor,
bacteria, mold, and mildew;
• Is recommended to be run
intermittently by the manufacturer; and
• Is separate from clothes washing
cycles.
DOE also proposes to integrate energy
and water consumption in self-clean
cycles into the overall energy efficiency
metric, under the assumption that these
cycles are typically run once per month.
As discussed in section III.C.5, DOE
proposes to define IMEF as the clothes
container capacity in ft3 divided by the
sum, expressed in kWh, of:
• The total weighted per-cycle hot
water energy consumption,
• The total weighted per-cycle
machine electrical energy consumption,
• The per-cycle energy consumption
for removing moisture from a test load,
• The per-cycle standby mode and off
mode energy consumption, and
• The per-cycle energy consumption
from any self-clean cycles.
DOE proposes to calculate the percycle energy consumption from selfclean cycles by:
• Measuring the hot and cold water
consumption and the electrical energy
consumption for a self-clean cycle,
• Calculating the per-cycle hot water
energy consumption and summing with
the per-cycle machine electrical energy
consumption for the self-clean cycle,
and
• Multiplying by the number of selfclean cycles per year (12) divided by
295 annual active washing mode cycles.
This approach apportions the annual
energy use in self-clean mode to each
annual active washing mode cycle. DOE
notes that it only proposes to account
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
for self-clean cycles in the IMEF
calculation for clothes washers for
which the manufacturer provides and/or
recommends such cycles. If a clothes
washer is designed to address mold and
odor problems without the need for
separate dedicated cleaning cycles, the
per-cycle self-clean energy consumption
will be zero.
DOE proposes to use a similar
approach for including self-clean water
consumption in the calculation of IWF
(see section III.D.4.b). The total
measured hot and cold water
consumption for a self-clean cycle
would be multiplied by 12 self-clean
cycles per year divided by 295 annual
active washing mode cycles. This percycle self-clean water consumption
would be summed with the total
weighted per-cycle water consumption
in the active washing mode, then
divided by clothes container capacity to
obtain IWF.
DOE requests comment on self-clean
cycles, including the proposed
definition, the inclusion of self-clean
cycle energy and water use into the
overall energy efficiency metrics, and on
whether any relevant data are available
regarding self-clean cycles.
c. Adaptive Control Technologies
Adaptive control technologies can
adjust parameters such as agitation
speed, number of rinses, wash time, and
wash and rinse temperatures based on
the size, fabric mix, and soil level of a
wash load. The current test procedure
accounts for adaptive fill technologies,
but no other types of adaptive controls.
AHAM, BSH Home Appliances
Corporation (BSH), and Whirlpool
commented in response to the August
2009 framework document that adaptive
controls are already widely used in
residential clothes washers. DOE agrees
that multiple models are available on
the market that use adaptive control
technologies to respond to measured or
inferred load size and fabric mix.
However, DOE lacks data on the
distribution of load size and fabric
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
content representative of actual
consumer usage. DOE is also not aware
of any residential clothes washers that
currently incorporate soil sensing
systems. According to multiple
manufacturers that DOE interviewed,
implementing soil sensing systems
requires overcoming several technical
challenges. For example, typical soil
sensors have difficulty identifying a
single soiled clothing item. Also,
detergent foaming can interfere with
control systems using turbidity sensors
to monitor the clarity of the wash water.
DOE is aware that other consumer
products employ adaptive controls, and
that these are addressed in their
respective test procedures. For example,
many dishwashers incorporate adaptive
controls by means of a turbidity sensor
which adjusts the number and duration
of wash and rinse cycles. The
dishwasher test procedure accounts for
these models through the use of soiled
dishware loads. (10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix C)
If clothes washers become available
that offer adaptive controls using a
turbidity sensor, DOE could consider
amending the clothes washer test
procedure to measure energy and water
consumption with a soiled wash load.
DOE is aware of other industry and
international clothes washer test
procedures that use a soiled wash load
to determine wash performance,
including AHAM HLW–1, ‘‘Performance
Evaluation Procedures for Household
Clothes Washers,’’ IEC 60456, ‘‘Clothes
washing machines for household use—
Methods for measuring the
performance,’’ and Standards Australia/
Standards New Zealand (AS/NZS)
2040.1, ‘‘Performance of household
electrical appliances—Clothes washing
machines—Methods for measuring
performance, energy and water
consumption.’’ 14 DOE could, for
example, incorporate the test cloth
soiling method from one of these test
procedures into the DOE clothes washer
test procedure to capture the energy and
water consumption effects of adaptive
controls.
DOE welcomes comment on whether
there are any clothes washers available
on the market offering soil-sensing
adaptive controls, and on its tentative
decision to account for only adaptive fill
controls in the test procedure. DOE
further invites information on the size
distribution and fabric content of wash
loads typical of consumer use, and
comment on using a soiled test load to
determine energy and water
14 AHAM and AS/NZS standards are available
online at https://webstore.ansi.org/.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
consumption in the presence of
adaptive controls.
d. Demand Response Technology
Demand response technology enables
an appliance to shift its activity based
on interaction with the electric grid,
utilities, or user programming.
Appliances that can communicate with
the electric grid or any other network
would be considered to have a network
mode as defined by IEC Standard 62301
FDIS. This standard defines network
mode as a mode category that includes
‘‘any product modes where the energy
using product is connected to a mains
power source and at least one network
function is activated (such as
reactivation via network command or
network integrity communication) but
where the primary function is not
active.’’ IEC Standard 62301 FDIS also
provides a note stating, ‘‘[w]here a
network function is provided but is not
active and/or not connected to a
network, then this mode is not
applicable. A network function could
become active intermittently according
to a fixed schedule or in response to a
network requirement. A ‘network’ in
this context includes communication
between two or more separate
independently powered devices or
products. A network does not include
one or more controls which are
dedicated to a single product. Network
mode may include one or more standby
functions.’’
In response to the August 2009
framework document, DOE received
multiple comments regarding demand
response technologies in clothes
washers. Energy Solutions, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern
California Gas Company (SoCal Gas),
San Diego Gas and Electric Company
(SDG&E), and Southern California
Edison Design & Engineering Services
(SoCal Edison) (jointly, the California
Utilities) commented that it is important
for DOE standards to give credit not
only to energy conservation, but to the
reduction of peak demand from demand
responsive controls. (California Utilities,
No. 18 at p. 6) AHAM commented that
DOE should evaluate the capability of
residential clothes washers to provide
peak load shedding capabilities through
a ‘‘smart grid’’ infrastructure. (AHAM,
No. 15 at p. 4) General Electric (GE) also
commented in support of DOE
considering demand responsiveness as a
technology associated with residential
clothes washers. (GE, No. 19 at p. 3)
Samsung Electronics America
(Samsung) commented that DOE should
consider smart grid or grid-enabled
appliance technologies for their effect
on energy use as it drafts DOE’s clothes
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57569
washer test procedure. (Samsung, No.
22 at p. 4)
However, as mentioned in section
III.C.2, DOE does not propose amending
the test procedure to include any
provisions for measuring energy
consumption in network mode because
it is unaware of any clothes washers
currently available on the market that
incorporate a networking function. At
this time, DOE is unaware of any data
regarding network mode in clothes
washers that would enable it to
determine appropriate testing
procedures and mode definitions for
incorporation into the test procedure. In
particular, DOE is unaware of:
• Data and methods for the
appropriate configuration of networks;
• Whether network connection speed
or the number and type of network
connections affect power consumption;
• Whether wireless network devices
may have different power consumptions
when the device is looking for a
connection and when the network
connection is actually established;
• How the energy consumption for
clothes washers in a network
environment may be affected by their
product design and user interaction as
well as network interaction; and
• Whether the network function
could become active intermittently
according to a fixed schedule or in
response to a network requirement.
For these reasons, the proposed
amendments in today’s NOPR do not
include the measurement of energy use
in network mode. Provisions for testing
power consumption in network mode
could be incorporated into the test
procedure through future amendments,
once the appropriate data and testing
methodologies become available. DOE
welcomes comment on whether clothes
washers that incorporate a networking
function are currently available, and
whether definitions and testing
procedures for a network mode should
be incorporated into the DOE test
procedure. DOE also requests comment
on appropriate methodologies for
measuring energy consumption in a
network mode, and data on the
repeatability of such testing
methodology.
2. Changes To Reflect Current Usage
Patterns and Capabilities
a. Representative Annual Cycles
In the January 2001 final rule, DOE
estimated the representative number of
annual wash cycles per clothes washer
as 392. 66 FR 3314. This number is not
used in the calculations for the current
energy efficiency metric, because MEF
is calculated on a per cycle basis. In this
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57570
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
NOPR, DOE is proposing to include
power consumption from modes other
than active washing mode in the energy
efficiency metric. As discussed above,
doing so requires an estimate of the time
a typical clothes washer spends in
active washing, inactive, off, delay start,
cycle finished, and self-clean modes.
The number of annual wash cycles is
used to determine the time spent in the
active washing mode, and determines
the remaining time to be allocated to the
other possible modes.
DOE received comments in response
to the August 2009 framework
document on the number of average
clothes washer cycles per year. Alliance
Laundry Systems, LLC (ALS)
commented that the annual cycles value
should be revised to approximately 300
cycles per year, referring to Procter &
Gamble (P&G) consumer studies which
have been used by DOE in prior test
procedure rulemakings. (ALS, No. 12 at
p. 1) The Joint Comment and ASE stated
that DOE should acquire data for an
updated annual number of wash cycles
because the current value in the test
procedure is based on outdated
consumer usage patterns and machine
characteristics. (Joint Comment, No. 14
at p. 1; ASE, No. 22 at p. 1) AHAM
stated that it supported the use of data
from the 2005 ‘‘Residential Energy
Consumption Survey’’ (RECS) in
determining the annual energy and
water consumption of residential
clothes washers. (AHAM, No. 15 at p. 6)
Additionally, Whirlpool commented
that the RECS data has limitations, but
that it was unaware of any more robust
alternatives to determine annual energy
and water consumption of residential
clothes washers. (Whirlpool, No. 21 at
p. 7)
The 2005 RECS compiles data on
energy use in residential buildings from
households across the United States.
The survey has a section devoted to
appliance usage, including residential
clothes washer usage. The survey asked
respondents to identify the average
number of loads per week that they
wash, with response options of 1 or
fewer, 2 to 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 15, and more
than 15 loads per week. DOE assigned
a representative average number of wash
cycles per year to each of these response
categories, and calculated the weighted
average. Using this method, DOE
determined that the data show an
average of 295 wash cycles per year.
DOE is aware that the ‘‘California
Residential Appliance Saturation
Survey’’ (California RASS) from 2004
also provides data on the use of
residential appliances. For clothes
washer use, the survey asks for the
number of loads washed in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
household during a typical week using
hot, warm, and cold wash water
temperature settings. There are 11
response options, ranging from zero to
10+ per week. DOE summed the average
number of wash loads per week for each
water temperature and scaled this
weekly value to an annual value to
determine the average number of wash
cycles per year. Using this method, the
California RASS data show an average
of 283 wash cycles per year.
P&G also supplied DOE with data on
typical consumer use of clothes
washers. The P&G data show an average
of 308 wash cycles per year. DOE review
determined that the P&G data set
contains fewer single-person
households and more multiple-person
households than the 2005 RECS data,
which more closely approximates the
household sizes shown in the latest
sampling performed by the U.S. Census
Bureau and the American Housing
Survey in 2007.15 DOE believes that the
larger average household size in the
P&G study could lead to the higher
average annual wash cycles value found
in the P&G data.
In today’s notice, DOE is proposing
295 as the representative number of
wash cycles per year based on the 2005
RECS data. DOE believes this is a more
representative value than the results of
the California RASS because the survey
is nationwide rather than limited to a
single State. DOE also believes the 2005
RECS value is more representative of
average use than the value based on the
P&G study due to the household size
distribution of the data sets. Overall,
however, the relatively small variation
among the three estimates of annual
clothes washer cycles supports DOE’s
tentative conclusion that 295 cycles per
year is a reasonable value to include in
its clothes washer test procedure.
DOE welcomes comment on whether
295 wash cycles per year is
representative of typical consumer use,
and whether the 2005 RECS is an
appropriate source of data for this issue.
DOE also seeks any additional data
relevant to the representative number of
annual clothes washer cycles.
b. Test Load Size Specifications
The current DOE clothes washer test
procedure specifies the test load size for
the active washing mode energy tests
based on the clothes washer’s container
volume. The table specifying the test
load sizes in the test procedure, Table
5.1, currently only covers clothes
15 Information on the American Housing Survey
can be found on the U.S. Census Bureau Web site
at https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/
ahs.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
washer container volumes up to 3.8 ft3.
DOE is aware that multiple clothes
washers available on the market have
container volumes exceeding 3.8 ft3.
ALS commented in response to the
August 2009 framework document that
it supports revising Table 5.1 to account
for larger capacities because larger
capacity clothes washers exist in the
marketplace, for which Whirlpool filed
a petition for waiver on November 21,
2005. 71 FR 48913. ALS also stated that
it supports Whirlpool’s petition. (ALS,
No. 12 at p. 1) AHAM and Whirlpool
commented that DOE should expand
Table 5.1 to include washer capacities
up to 6 ft3. AHAM stated that the larger
capacities should be addressed by
continuing the linear relationship used
in the current table. (AHAM, No. 15 at
p. 2; Whirlpool, No. 21 at p. 1)
DOE also received comments from the
Joint Comment and ASE opposing the
expansion of the test load size
specifications to cover container
volumes up to 6 ft3 unless DOE verifies
the validity of the calculations used in
Table 5.1 with current consumer data.
Specifically, these commenters request
that DOE verify the average load
calculations across machines of
different capacities. These commenters
also stated that DOE should ensure that
the calculations do not introduce a bias
favoring clothes washers with larger
capacities. (Joint Comment, No. 14 at
pp. 1–2; ASE, No. 22 at p. 1)
In response to Whirlpool’s November
2005 request for waiver, DOE granted an
interim test procedure waiver to
Whirlpool for three of Whirlpool’s
clothes washer models with container
capacities greater than 3.8 ft3. 71 FR
48913 (August 22, 2006). This notice
contained an alternate test procedure,
which extended the linear relationship
between maximum test load size and
clothes washer container volume in
Table 5.1 to include a maximum test
load size of 15.4 pounds (lbs) for clothes
washer container volumes of 3.8 to 3.9
ft3.
DOE is aware of limited data
regarding typical clothes washer load
sizes. In 2003, P&G conducted a survey
on load size with 510 respondents,
comprising 3367 loads of laundry. The
data from this survey show an average
load size of 7.2 lbs for top-loading
machines, and 8.4 lbs for front-loading
machines. These load sizes correspond
to the average test loads for the 2.7–2.8
ft3 and 3.3–3.4 ft3 clothes washer
capacity bins, respectively, in Table 5.1.
These results are consistent with the
shipment-weighted average tub volume
of 3.05 ft3 from the 2005 AHAM
Factbook.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
P&G has also noted that increases in
average load size tend to correlate with
increases in clothes washer capacities.
DOE has found that from 1993 to 2005,
tub capacities have increased by 14
percent, based on AHAM data, while
the number of cycles per year has
decreased by 17 percent, based on RECS
data. Assuming that households
continued to wash the same volume of
clothes each year, the data imply that,
on average, the wash loads were larger.
The limited data on this subject
suggest that the current values in the
test load size chart are appropriate, and
extending the linear relationship
between test load size and container
capacity to larger capacities is valid.
Thus, DOE proposes amending the
clothes washer test procedure to
establish test load size specifications for
clothes washer container volumes up to
6.0 ft3. The amendment would be based
on a continuation of the linear
relationship between test load size and
clothes washer container volume
currently in the DOE clothes washer test
procedure. DOE welcomes comment on
the proposed test load sizes, including
whether the linear relationship between
test load size and clothes washer
container volume is representative of
actual consumer use, and additional
consumer use data relevant to this topic.
DOE received comments from the
Joint Comment and ASE regarding usage
factors in the current clothes washer test
procedure. They stated that DOE should
validate the use factors for minimum,
average, and maximum loads, TUFs,
and the DUF based on current data.
They also stated that DOE should verify
that the current use factors for load
size—12 percent for minimum load size,
74 percent for average load size, and 14
percent for maximum load size—do not
introduce a systematic bias favoring
large capacity clothes washers. These
factors also might not reflect current
consumer usage because they were
established in the 1990s and because the
assumed downward trend in the
number of annual wash cycles may
indicate that loads are, on average,
larger. The Joint Comment and ASE also
suggested that DOE should reassess the
load adjustment factor (LAF) used in the
RMC calculation. This factor is intended
to represent the ratio of maximum load
size to average load size, but a fixed
value of 0.52 is used despite the ratio
changing as capacity increases
according to the data in Table 5.1. (Joint
Comment, No. 14 at pp. 1–3; ASE, No.
22 at p. 1)
DOE’s responses to these comments
on use factors are discussed separately
in the following sections.
c. Use Factors
The clothes washer test procedure
relies on use factors to weight different
consumer behaviors in the overall
energy and water consumption
calculations. The factors are based on
consumer use data and represent the
fraction of all cycles that are run with
certain settings or characteristics. The
use factors in the test procedure cover
wash and rinse temperatures, load sizes,
and dryer use.
i. Load Size Use Factors
The load size use factors in the DOE
test procedure represent the fraction of
all wash cycles a typical consumer runs
for the minimum, average, and
maximum load sizes. DOE is not aware
of recent data characterizing such usage
patterns. Therefore, DOE is not
proposing in today’s notice to change
the load size use factors. DOE welcomes
input and data on consumer selection of
load sizes.
57571
ii. Temperature Use Factors
As stated in section III.D.1.a, DOE
proposes amending the TUFs in its
clothes washer test procedure to
account for steam wash cycles, and to
revise the warm rinse TUF. DOE
believes the steam wash cycle TUF only
affects the extra hot TUF, leaving the
other TUFs unchanged.
Among the limited data on consumer
wash and rinse temperature selections,
the 2005 RECS and the 2004 California
RASS both provide some information on
temperature selections. However, each
of these surveys only disaggregate
temperature use into hot, warm, and
cold cycle settings, providing no
information on extra hot or steam use.
Further, the RECS questionnaire asks
respondents only for the water
temperature selections usually used for
the wash and rinse cycles of a clothes
washer, which may not account for the
less-frequent use of the hot wash cycle.
Hot wash cycles are generally used for
the most heavily soiled loads, which
DOE believes would not represent the
water temperature selection usually
used by consumers. As a result, the
2005 RECS data may support a hot wash
use factor that is lower than the actual
value. The California RASS
questionnaire asks for the number of
wash loads per week typically washed
at hot, warm, and cold temperature
settings. While this phrasing captures
the use of all three temperature
selections, the California RASS only
represents one State, and may not reflect
consumer use nationwide. Table III.5
compares the TUFs from these two
surveys with the current values in the
DOE clothes washer test procedure for
hot, warm, and cold washes, and for
warm rinse.
TABLE III.5—TEMPERATURE USE FACTORS
TUF, current test
procedure
Temperature setting
TUF, 2005 RECS
0.14
0.49
0.37
0.27
0.062
0.542
0.397
0.2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Hot Wash ...........................................................................................................................
Warm Wash .......................................................................................................................
Cold Wash .........................................................................................................................
Warm Rinse .......................................................................................................................
Because the factors from each source
demonstrate general agreement, DOE
believes that the TUFs in its test
procedure are a reasonable estimate of
current consumer use. While DOE is
therefore proposing to amend only the
TUFs for clothes washers offering a
steam wash cycle as discussed in
section III.D.1.a and shown in Table
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
III.4, DOE welcomes comment on the
proposed TUFs.
DOE also notes that it has recently
received consumer usage survey data
from a manufacturer which indicate
that, for one clothes washer model with
no cold rinse option on the cycle
recommended for cotton clothes and a
default cold rinse on all other cycles,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
TUF, 2004
California
RASS
0.2
0.41
0.39
N/A
users participating in the survey
reported using warm rinse for 1.6
percent of all cycles. Although DOE
does not believe that this conclusion
necessarily applies to all consumers and
residential clothes washer models, it
remains open to considering the warm
rinse TUF and welcomes further data
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57572
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
regarding consumer usage of warm
rinse.
In addition, DOE proposes to revise
the methods for measuring warm rinse
and incorporating the revised
measurement into the test procedure’s
calculations. The current test procedure
addresses warm rinses by applying a
TUF of 0.27 to account for the
incremental energy consumption of a
warm rinse over that of a cold rinse.
This indicates that 27 percent of all
loads across all temperatures use a
warm rinse. Because the test procedure
incrementally accounts for warm rinses,
the relevant provisions require the
measurement of hot water consumption
for the warm rinse only and the
measurement of the electrical energy
consumed by the clothes washer to heat
the rinse water only. For some clothes
washers, though, it is not entirely clear
when water consumption for the wash
cycle ends and rinse begins because
multiple fill and drain events may occur
in various sequences.
To address this uncertainty, DOE
believes that it is more appropriate to
measure energy and water consumption
over an entire cycle that utilizes warm
rinse. DOE believes that most clothes
washers currently available on the
market allow users to select a warm
rinse only with a warm wash cycle. DOE
is, therefore, proposing to establish a
TUF for a full warm wash/warm rinse
cycle and to eliminate the incremental
use factor currently attributed to warm
rinse. DOE believes that the value of this
incremental use factor of 0.27 would
represent a valid TUF for the warm
wash/warm rinse cycle. For those
clothes washers with such an option,
DOE is also proposing to decrement the
warm wash/cold rinse TUF by a
corresponding amount, reducing it from
0.49 to 0.22. DOE further proposes that
the warm wash/warm rinse TUF would
not be applicable for clothes washers
with one or two wash temperature
settings because these washers would
not be capable of warm wash.
DOE is not proposing to amend the
TUFs for wash temperature selections
other than the warm wash.
Additionally, the proposed TUFs for
warm/cold and warm/warm sum to the
current warm wash TUF. Overall, the
warm wash temperature selection
would receive the same weight in the
energy and water consumption
calculations.
DOE recognizes that not all clothes
washers offer a warm/warm temperature
selection under the normal wash cycle
setting recommended for washing
cotton or linen clothes (hereafter, the
‘‘Normal’’ setting). For these clothes
washers, if a warm/warm cycle is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
available in any other wash cycle setting
that employs agitation/tumble
operation, spin speed(s), wash times,
and rinse times that are largely similar
to the ‘‘Normal’’ cycle, the warm/warm
cycle would be tested using the wash
cycle setting that would best reflect
typical consumer use. Under the current
test procedure, only the hot water
consumption for the warm rinse and the
electrical energy consumed by the
clothes washer to heat the rinse water
are required to be measured for this
cycle. The proposed test procedure
would require measuring energy and
water consumption over the complete
warm wash/warm rinse cycle. As a
result, MEF measured under the current
test procedure could differ from the
MEF measured with under the proposed
revisions. During the ongoing energy
conservation standards rulemaking,
DOE expects to analyze potential effects
of the proposed warm rinse
methodology on measured MEF and
incorporate any such effects, as
appropriate, into any amended
standards.
As stated above, DOE welcomes
comment on these proposed TUFs,
including steam wash and warm wash/
warm rinse cycles, and on whether any
other consumer use data regarding
temperature setting selection is
available. DOE also requests comment
and any relevant data on whether the
proposed method of incorporating warm
rinse would affect MEF ratings.
iii. Dryer Use Factor
DOE investigated whether the DUF of
0.84 in its clothes washer test procedure
reflects current consumer usage. The
2005 RECS includes data on both
clothes washer and clothes dryer use.
As stated previously in section III.D.2.a,
AHAM and Whirlpool both commented
in support of using RECS data for
representative annual cycles, because
they believe no other alternative data set
is available. (AHAM, No. 15 at p. 6;
Whirlpool, No. 21 at p. 7)
Analysis of the RECS data shows that,
for households with both a clothes
washer and dryer, the average DUF is
0.96. For all households with a clothes
washer, the average DUF is 0.91. This
use factor is lower because it includes
households with only a clothes washer
and no dryer. DOE also analyzed the
2004 California RASS to determine that
its data show a DUF of 0.86 for
households with both a clothes washer
and dryer. This dryer use factor is based
on 283 clothes washer cycles per year as
supported by the California RASS, not
the proposed 295 cycles per year in
today’s NOPR. Including households
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
without a clothes dryer, the California
RASS data show a DUF of 0.76.
DOE proposes amending its clothes
washer test procedure to include a DUF
of 0.91, based on the 2005 RECS. DOE
is proposing 0.91 rather than 0.96
because the clothes washer test
procedure aims to estimate the energy
use of all clothes washers, regardless of
clothes dryer ownership. DOE is
proposing to use the value derived from
the 2005 RECS rather than the 2004
California RASS to be consistent with
the proposed number of wash cycles per
year and because, as stated in section
III.D.2.a, the RECS data represent the
entire country rather than one State.
DOE welcomes comment on the
proposed value of 0.91 for the DUF and
using the RECS data to calculate this
value.
iv. Load Adjustment Factor
Load Adjustment Factor (LAF)
represents the ratio of maximum load
size to average load size. This ratio is
used in the calculation of the energy
required to remove moisture from the
test load. The RMC value used in this
calculation is based only on tests using
the maximum test load, so the LAF is
used to scale this value down to the
average load size. DOE lacks
information warranting adjusting this
value or changing it from a fixed value
to one that varies as a function of
average load size, and is therefore not
proposing to amend the LAF in the test
procedure. DOE welcomes comments on
appropriate adjustments that could be
made to the LAF.
3. Test Cloth
The current clothes washer test
procedure requires the use of closelyspecified test cloth for the energy test
cycles. The test cloth affects the
calculated energy consumption largely
through the RMC value. RMC is
calculated as the ratio of the weight of
water absorbed by the test cloth after a
complete energy cycle to the initial
weight of the ‘‘bone dry’’ test cloth,
multiplied by 100 percent. The RMC is
then used to calculate the per-cycle
energy consumption for removal of
moisture from the test load. Because the
test cloth plays a central role in
determining energy consumption, the
test procedure includes provisions to
ensure consistent and accurate results.
The test cloth characteristics can vary
based on production lot, or even within
the same lot, so the test procedure
includes a calibration procedure to
provide consistent results for all test
cloth.
DOE received multiple comments in
response to the August 2009 framework
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57573
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
document regarding the test cloth used
in its clothes washer test procedure.
ALS commented that DOE should revise
the test procedure to improve test cloth
calibration auditing. (ALS, No. 12 at p.
1) AHAM submitted detailed comments
on this issue, including a proposal it
sent to DOE on September 22, 2008, that
addresses energy test cloth tolerances,
provides additional detail for
determining RMC, and removes
redundant sections regarding
preconditioning the test cloths. AHAM
also commented that DOE should
provide guidance and/or support on the
annual test cloth correlation work,
including a proposal for the creation of
a DOE Test Cloth Advisory Panel.
(AHAM, No. 15 at pp. 2, 10, 14–18, 34)
In a letter to DOE sent March 29, 2010,
AHAM confirmed that the AHAM DOE
Test Cloth Task Force, which includes
AHAM members, BSH, Electrolux Home
Products, GE, Samsung, Whirlpool, and
SDL Atlas, supported the test clothrelated changes to the test procedure
that were proposed in AHAM’s
comments submitted for the framework
document. Whirlpool commented in
support of the AHAM test cloth
proposal. Whirlpool also commented
that DOE should provide guidance and/
or support on the test cloth issues not
addressed by the current test cloth
supplier, which include quality,
correlation coefficients, and the
availability of new fabric lots.
(Whirlpool, No. 21 at pp. 1–2)
DOE believes that the test cloth
specifications that AHAM proposed
represent the industry’s consensus on
the available means to limit uncertainty
in the test procedure due to variations
in the test cloth properties. DOE is
therefore proposing to update the
sections of the test procedure regarding
test cloth to reflect the changes in
September 22, 2008, proposal included
in the AHAM comment and supported
by Whirlpool and the Test Cloth Task
Force. The current test procedure does
not specify any tolerances for the size
and weight of the energy test cloths.
DOE is proposing the following
tolerances:
• In section 2.6.1, ‘‘Energy Test
Cloth,’’ the energy test cloth shall be 24
± 1⁄2 inches by 36 ± 1⁄2 inches (61.0 ± 1.3
cm by 91.4 ± 1.3 cm) and hemmed to 22
± 1⁄2 inches by 34 ± 1⁄2 inches (55.9 ± 1.3
cm by 86.4 ± 1.3 cm) before washing;
• In section 2.6.2, ‘‘Energy Stuffer
Cloth,’’ the energy stuffer cloth shall be
12 ± 1⁄4 inches by 12 ± 1⁄4 inches (30.5
± .6 cm by 30.5 ± .6 cm) and hemmed
to 10 ± 1⁄4 inches by 10 ± 1⁄4 inches (25.4
± .6 cm by 25.4 ± 0.6 cm) before
washing; and
• In section 2.6.4.2, the fabric weight
specification shall be 5.60 ± 0.25 ounces
per square yard (190.0 ± 8.4 g/m2).
According to AHAM, these tolerances
are supported by test cloth supplier
data. DOE believes that manufacturers
generally agree with these updated
tolerances, as they were proposed
through AHAM. It also believes that
specified tolerances will result in
consistency across lots of test cloth.
The current test procedure also
contains redundant sections regarding
the test cloth specifications and
preconditioning. DOE proposes to delete
the redundant sections 2.6.1.1–2.6.1.2.4.
These sections were made obsolete in
the 2001 Final Rule, which added
sections 2.6.3 through 2.6.7.2 into
Appendix J1. 66 FR 3314. However,
DOE proposes to use in section 2.6.4.3
the thread count specification from
deleted section 2.6.1.1(A), of 65 × 57 per
inch (warp × fill), based on supplier
data. Additionally, DOE proposes to
maintain a shrinkage limit, relocated
from section 2.6.1.1(B) to new section
2.6.4.7, but to increase the limit from 4
percent to 5 percent on the length and
width. DOE also proposes to require the
cloth shrinkage be measured as per the
American Association of Textile
Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) Test
Method 135–2004, ‘‘Dimensional
Changes of Fabrics after Home
Laundering.’’ These revisions are also
supported by supplier data, according to
AHAM. (AHAM, No. 15 at p. 15)
The current DOE test procedure uses
extractor tests of up to 500 units of
gravitational acceleration (g) in
determining the RMC correlation curve
for test cloth lots. Clothes washers
currently available on the market are
capable of higher spin speeds that
achieve g-forces higher than 500 g. DOE
is therefore proposing to include an
additional set of extraction tests at 650
g. Because of the prevalence of higher
spin speeds, DOE is also proposing to
remove the requirement that the 500 g
requirement be used only if a clothes
washer can achieve spin speeds in the
500 g range. These proposed
amendments will result in 60 extractor
RMC test runs required for correlation
testing rather than the currently
required 48. DOE is also proposing to
update Tables 2.6.5—Matrix of Extractor
RMC Test Conditions, and Table
2.6.6.1—Standard RMC Values (RMC
Standard) to include tests at 650 g. The
proposed updated Table 2.6.6.1 is
shown below in Table III.6, and it
contains the additional standard RMC
values at 650 g that were suggested by
AHAM and supported by the AHAM
DOE Test Cloth Task Force.
TABLE III.6—STANDARD RMC VALUES (RMC STANDARD)
RMC percentage
‘‘g Force’’
Warm soak
Cold soak
15 min. spin
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
100
200
350
500
650
4 min. spin
15 min. spin
4 min. spin
45.9
35.7
29.6
24.2
23.0
49.9
40.4
33.1
28.7
26.4
49.7
37.9
30.7
25.5
24.1
52.8
43.1
35.8
30.0
28.0
AHAM also commented on certain
equipment necessary for extractor RMC
tests. Specifically, AHAM suggested
updating the manufacturer specified for
the extractor from Bock Engineered
Products to North Star Engineered
Products, Inc., although the extractor
model number remains the same.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
AHAM also suggested updating the
requirements for bone drying the test
cloth in preparation for determining the
RMC of the test loads in the extractor
tests, including a requirement for using
a clothes dryer capable of heating the
test cloth to over 210 degrees Fahrenheit
(°F) (99 degrees Celsius (°C)). AHAM
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
also suggested clarifications to the
requirements for bundling and draining
the test cloth prior to completing the
extractor spin cycles. These
clarifications include procedures to
create loose bundles of four test clothes
each, as well as a time limit of 5 seconds
for gravity draining the bundles after
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57574
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
soaking and 1 minute for overall
draining and loading of all bundles into
the extractor. Whirlpool stated that it
supports these revisions and
clarifications. (AHAM, No. 15 at pp. 17–
18; Whirlpool, No. 21 at p. 1) DOE
concurs that these revisions are
appropriate. In particular, DOE
conducted extractor testing and
observed that handling the test cloth as
specified by AHAM produces consistent
and repeatable RMC measurements for
use in developing RMC correction
curves. DOE also notes that North Star
Engineered Products, Inc. operates at
the same location and supplies the same
model of extractor as the previously
specified Bock Engineered Products,
and that AHAM’s proposed
requirements for a bone dryer add
specificity that was previously lacking
in the test procedure and have general
industry approval. Therefore, DOE
proposes in today’s notice to amend its
clothes washer test procedure in
sections 2.6.5.1 and 2.6.5.3 as discussed
above, and add new section 2.12 with
the bone dryer specifications.
AHAM also recommended that DOE
add a section 2.6.5.3.1.2 to include a
‘‘Bone Drying Procedure.’’ (AHAM, No.
15 at p. 17) DOE finds that this
procedure is duplicative of the
definition of ‘‘bone-dry’’ in section 1 of
its test procedure, and, therefore, is not
proposing to amend section 2.6.5.3.1 as
suggested by AHAM.
DOE requests comment on the
proposed updated test cloth tolerances
and correlation procedure. DOE also
requests any data related to the test
cloth and correlation procedures.
4. Other Revisions and Clarifications
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
a. Clothes Washer Capacity
Measurement Method
The current clothes washer test
procedure requires measuring clothes
container capacity as ‘‘the entire volume
which a dry clothes load could occupy
within the clothes container during
washer operation.’’ 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix J1. The procedure
involves filling the clothes washer with
water, and determining the volume
based on the added weight of water
divided by its density. Specifically, the
test procedure requires that the clothes
container be filled manually with either
60 °F ± 5 °F (15.6 °C ± 2.8 °C) or 100
°F ± 10 °F (37.8 °C ± 5.5 °C) water to
its ‘‘uppermost edge’’. Id.
DOE became aware that this general
specification of the water fill level could
lead to multiple capacity measurements
that do not reflect the actual capacity
available for washing clothes. DOE
conducted capacity tests on a small
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
sample of clothes washers to observe the
different possible fill levels and to
determine the variability associated
with the current capacity test method.
Comparison of measured capacities to
rated values for the models in DOE’s test
sample showed that the majority of the
reported capacities varied from DOE’s
measurements, some by as much as 0.5
ft3. To provide more specific
instructions on measuring the clothes
container capacity, DOE issued draft
guidance interpreting the maximum fill
level required by the existing test
procedure, available at https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/
frequently_asked_questions_cw_final_
05-13-2010.pdf. This draft guidance
determines the maximum fill level (i.e.,
the ‘‘uppermost edge’’) as the highest
horizontal plane that a clothes load
could occupy with the clothes container
oriented vertically.
Separate from development of the
guidance interpreting the fill level
required by the existing test procedure,
DOE sought comment in the August
2009 framework document on whether
improvements to the existing test
procedure were warranted. BSH
commented that a performance
assessment related to claimed load size
would significantly benefit the
consumer. According to BSH,
comparing clothes container volumes
between ‘‘regular efficiency’’ verticalaxis, high efficiency vertical-axis, and
horizontal-axis clothes washers can be
misleading. BSH stated that capacity
should be linked to performance to
better describe the utility of the
appliance. (BSH, No. 9 at p. 2) The Joint
Comment and ASE stated that the test
procedure capacity measurement should
reflect the useful volume of the clothes
container that is actually available for
clothes washing. The two comments
noted that in 1995 DOE received
information from Maytag that the
clothes container volumes for verticalaxis machines could be overstated by 15
to 20 percent. The two comments stated
that DOE should modify the test
procedure to provide more accurate
measurements if this overstatement is
still occurring today. (Joint Comment,
No. 14 at pp. 2–3; ASE, No. 22 at p. 1)
Samsung also commented that DOE
should propose to clarify how clothes
container capacity for vertical-axis
clothes washers is measured so that the
result would reflect the usable capacity
of the clothes washer. Samsung
suggested the Committee Draft for Vote
of IEC Standard 60456, Fifth Edition as
a possible source for the clarification.
That document specifies filling the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
clothes container with water ‘‘to its
uppermost edge which may be used to
fill in clothes, respecting manufacturer
instructions.’’ Samsung notes that
manufacturers instruct consumers to fill
clothes to the top of the clothes
container’s internal basket. (Samsung,
No. 24 at pp. 1–2) ALS commented that
DOE should revise the test procedure to
clarify that, for vertical-axis clothes
washers, the ‘‘uppermost edge’’
terminating point for the ‘‘capacity’’
measurement should be defined as the
‘‘top of the tub cover.’’ (ALS, No. 12 at
p. 1) ASAP expressed concern that the
advertised capacity of a specific model
is typically larger than the capacity
that’s reported to ENERGY STAR, CEC,
and other public databases. (ASAP,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 7 at p.
20) According to the Joint Comment, the
advertised capacity may be based on the
DOE capacity, multiplied by an IEC
conversion factor of 15/13, but that this
conversion may not be made apparent.
(Joint Comment, No. 14 at p. 2)
DOE believes that these comments
indicate that improvements to the
description of the fill level required by
the current test procedure could result
in more stable, accurate, representative,
and repeatable capacity measurements.
The following paragraphs describe
DOE’s proposed changes to the test
measurements for both horizontal-axis
and vertical-axis clothes washers.
For vertical-axis clothes washers, DOE
proposes that the clothes container be
filled to the uppermost edge of the
rotating portion, including any balance
ring. In tests DOE conducted on a
limited sample of residential clothes
washers for this rulemaking, DOE
observed the maximum height to which
the dry clothes could be filled in a
vertical-axis clothes washer technically
includes space above the upper surface
of the stationary portion over the wash
tub (commonly referred to as the tub
cover.) However, in most cases, if
clothes were placed in that region
during a wash cycle, it is likely that
portion of the load would not interact
with water and detergent properly, and
that entanglement would also likely
occur. Based on its tests and review of
manufacturer recommendations
provided in product manuals, DOE
believes the uppermost edge of the
rotating portion of the clothes container
for a vertical-axis clothes washer would
be the highest horizontal plane that a
clothes load could occupy while
maintaining proper wash performance
and ensuring a stable, accurate, and
repeatable measurement. This would
include the uppermost edge of any
balance ring attached to the clothes
container. Additionally, any volume
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
within the clothes container that a
clothing load could not occupy during
active washing mode operation should
be excluded from the measurement.
For horizontal-axis clothes washers,
DOE proposes that the clothes container
be filled to the uppermost edge that is
in contact with the door seal. DOE
believes that the uppermost edge of the
clothes container would typically be the
portion of the door seal in contact with
the door during operation. DOE also
considered using the inner surface of
the closed door as a possible definition
of the uppermost edge of the clothes
container. However, DOE observed
during testing that small variations in
the leveling of the clothes container’s
upper edge can make it difficult to
determine in a repeatable way the water
level that just meets the inner door
surface. Additionally, measuring to the
innermost surface of the closed door
would not account for the extra volume
available due to other parts of the door
not projecting as far into the clothes
container. Therefore, DOE believes that
the uppermost edge of the clothes
container that is in contact with the
door seal for a horizontal-axis clothes
washer would be the highest horizontal
plane that a clothes load could occupy,
as determined with the door open. Any
volume within the clothes container
that the clothing load could not occupy
during active washing mode operation
must be excluded.
DOE believes the proposed
amendments would provide a consistent
approach to determining the fill level
and result in a representative capacity
measurement. DOE is aware of other
methods for measuring the clothes
container capacity, such as those
contained in IEC Standard 60456, but
believes these other methods create an
unnecessary test burden by using
uncommon materials to measure the
container capacity, and may not result
in a capacity that is representative of
actual use. DOE welcomes comment on
whether the proposed method for
measuring clothes container capacity
provides a representative measurement
of the volume which a dry clothes load
could occupy within the clothes
container during washer operation. DOE
also welcomes comment on whether any
other valid measurement method is
available.
b. New Measure of Water Consumption
The calculation for WF currently set
forth in the clothes washer test
procedure is derived from only the
water consumed during the cold wash/
cold rinse wash cycle. 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix J1. Hot water
consumption is measured for all wash
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
cycles, including warm, hot, and extra
hot washes, but it is only used to
determine the energy needed to heat the
water. This presents an opportunity to
bias the test procedure results by setting
cold wash water consumption very low,
while using more water at higher
temperatures, in order to minimize the
weighted average water consumption on
which the WF is based.
To prevent such bias and to produce
the most representative value of water
consumption, DOE proposes to include
water consumption from all energy test
cycles in the calculation of the new
integrated metric, IWF. DOE believes
the proposed IWF calculation will
provide a more representative measure
of water consumption and will not
substantially increase manufacturers’
test burden. This is because hot water
consumption is already recorded for all
wash cycles and the equipment for
measuring cold water consumption
must be in place for the cold wash
cycles. DOE believes that, in practice,
manufacturers likely record the data for
cold water consumption at other wash
temperatures as well even though it is
not required by the current test
procedure.
DOE therefore proposes to measure
both the hot and cold water
consumption for each test cycle in order
to calculate IWF. Doing so will provide
total water consumption for each test
cycle, including self-clean cycles. The
total weighted per-cycle water
consumption will equal the self-clean
cycle water consumption multiplied by
the number of self-clean cycles per year
divided by 295 annual use cycles, plus
the total water consumption for each
test cycle multiplied by its TUF and
load usage factor. IWF is then equal to
this total weighted per-cycle water
consumption divided by the clothes
container volume.
DOE welcomes comment on the
validity of including water consumption
from all test cycles, including self-clean
cycles, in the proposed calculation of
IWF. DOE also requests comment on
whether the IWF calculation would
result in a significant test burden.
c. Energy Test Cycle
The energy test cycle is the cycle used
in determining the MEF and WF for a
clothes washer. The current clothes
washer test procedure defines the
energy test cycle as ‘‘(A) the cycle
recommended by the manufacturer for
washing cotton or linen clothes, and
includes all wash/rinse temperature
selections and water levels offered in
that cycle, and (B) for each other wash/
rinse temperature selection or water
level available on that basic model, the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57575
portion(s) of other cycle(s) with that
temperature selection or water level
that, when tested pursuant to these test
procedures, will contribute to an
accurate representation of the energy
consumption of the basic model as used
by consumers. Any cycle under (A) or
(B) shall include the agitation/tumble
operation, spin speed(s), wash times,
and rinse times applicable to that cycle,
including water heating time for water
heating clothes washers.’’ 10 CFR 430,
subpart B, appendix J1.
Many machines provide a ‘‘normal’’
cycle setting, or some equivalent, which
is typically used for washing cotton or
linen clothes. Testing conducted using
the normal cycle setting satisfies part A
of the energy test cycle definition.
However, many of these normal cycle
settings limit range of wash and rinse
temperature selections. For example,
they may offer cold and warm wash
temperatures with cold rinse, but may
not allow the user to select a hot or extra
hot wash, or a warm wash with warm
rinse. Testing only the wash
temperature options available to the
normal cycle, despite being able to
access the other temperature options by
switching out of the normal cycle, may
neglect part B of the energy test cycle
definition, which requires
manufacturers to switch out of the
normal cycle to a different setting that
allows the other temperature settings to
be selected and tested if such testing
contributes to an accurate
representation of energy consumption as
used by consumers.
DOE understands that the
requirement to test different
temperature options ‘‘if such testing
contributes to an accurate
representation of energy consumption as
used by consumers’’ has caused some
confusion. As a result, DOE proposes to
amend part B of the energy test cycle
definition to definitively account for
temperature options available only
outside the normal cycle. The proposed
part (B) would read ‘‘* * * (B) if the
cycle described in (A) does not include
all wash/rinse temperature settings
available on the clothes washer, and
required for testing as described in this
test procedure, the energy test cycle
shall also include the portions of a cycle
setting offering these wash/rinse
temperature settings with agitation/
tumble operation, spin speed(s), wash
times, and rinse times that are largely
comparable to those for the cycle
recommended by the manufacturer for
washing cotton or linen clothes. Any
cycle under (A) or (B) shall include the
default agitation/tumble operation, soil
level, spin speed(s), wash times, and
rinse times applicable to that cycle,
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57576
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
including water heating time for water
heating clothes washers.’’ DOE believes
that requiring manufacturers to test
temperature options available outside
the normal cycle would result in clear
testing requirements. Combined with
appropriate TUFs, the proposed test
procedure would produce results that
measure energy consumption of clothes
washers during a representative average
use cycle or period of use, as required
by 42 U.S.C. 6923(b)(3).
DOE notes that it has issued draft
guidance, available at https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/
warm_rinse_guidance_july_30.pdf,
interpreting the definition of energy test
cycle under the existing clothes washer
test procedure. This draft guidance
states DOE’s view that under the
existing test procedure, the energy test
cycle should include the warm rinse of
the cycle most comparable to the cycle
recommended by the manufacturer for
washing cotton or linen clothes if warm
rinse is not available on the cotton or
linen cycle. In addition, DOE reiterates
in the guidance that under the existing
test procedure, warm rinse is to be
measured as being used 27 percent of
the time, regardless of whether the
warm rinse is available on the cotton or
linen cycle.
DOE also notes that it has received
information from a manufacturer that
suggests that cycles that vary from the
cotton or linen cycle by means of lower
spin speed result in a higher RMC than
would be measured for the cotton or
linen cycle, and therefore would not be
largely comparable to those for the cycle
recommended by the manufacturer for
washing cotton or linen clothes or
contribute to an accurate representation
of energy consumption as used by
consumers if they were included in the
energy test cycle.
DOE requests comment on the
proposed definition of the energy test
cycle and on how manufacturers
currently address wash/rinse
temperature selection under the current
definition, as well as the percentage of
loads in which consumers use warm
rinse, as represented by the TUFs
discussed in section III.D.2.c.ii. DOE
also requests comment on the selection
of cycles to be included in the energy
test cycle under section 1.7(B) of the test
procedure to definitively account for
temperature options available only
outside the normal cycle.
d. Detergent Specifications for Test
Cloth Preconditioning
The DOE clothes washer test
procedure currently specifies that the
test cloth be preconditioned by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
performing two normal wash-rinse-spin
cycles using AHAM Standard detergent
IIA. 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix J1. This detergent is obsolete
and no longer supplied by AHAM or
other suppliers. The current AHAM
standard detergent is identified as
AHAM standard test detergent Formula
3. Because AHAM Standard detergent
IIA is no longer available to
manufacturers, DOE proposes amending
the clothes washer test procedure to
specify the use of AHAM standard test
detergent Formula 3 in test cloth
preconditioning.
Tests that DOE conducted with
AHAM standard test detergent Formula
3 according to the existing DOE clothes
washer test procedure suggest that the
dosage that is specified in section
2.6.3.1 for AHAM Standard detergent
IIA—6.0 grams (g) per gallon of water—
may no longer be appropriate. At the
end of test cloth preconditioning,
undissolved clumps of detergent were
observed in the cloth load. Further, DOE
conducted extractor tests that indicate
that detergent dosage affects RMC
measurements by as much as several
percent.
Instructions provided with AHAM
standard test detergent Formula 3 by
one supplier of standard test materials,
SDL Atlas, indicate that the appropriate
dosage for this detergent is 27.0 g + 4.0
g per pound of cloth load. In addition,
AHAM’s clothes dryer test standard,
AHAM HLD–1–2009, specifies the same
dosage of AHAM standard test detergent
Formula 3 for test cloth pre-treatment.
Due to the problems associated with the
current dosage specification in the DOE
clothes washer test procedure, DOE is
tentatively proposing to amend the test
procedure to require 27.0 g + 4.0 g/lb of
AHAM standard test detergent Formula
3 for test cloth preconditioning.
However, DOE is also seeking further
information on the appropriate
detergent concentration.
e. Clothes Washer for Test Cloth
Preconditioning
Section 2.6.3.1 of the current DOE
clothes washer test procedure delineates
the requirements for preconditioning
the test cloths using a clothes washer for
which a maximum water level can be
set, the load can be washed for 10
minutes, and the wash temperature can
be controlled to 135 °F ± 5 °F (57.2 °C
± 2.8 °C). 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix J1. In interviews with DOE,
multiple manufacturers expressed
concern that there are currently few
clothes washers commercially available
that meet these requirements. They also
expressed concern that the more
stringent energy conservation standards
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
that may result from the residential
clothes washer standards rulemaking
may eliminate such clothes washer
models from the market entirely. DOE
seeks information regarding an
alternative specification for the clothes
washer to be used for preconditioning
that would allow for the use of more
recent models.
f. Water Supply Pressure
Section 2.4 of the current DOE clothes
washer test procedure provides the
water pressure test conditions.
According to this section, ‘‘[t]he static
water pressure at the hot and cold water
inlet connection of the clothes washer
shall be maintained at 35 pounds per
square inch gauge (psig) ±/¥ 2.5 psig
(241.3 kPa ± 17.2 kPa) during the test.
The static water pressure for a single
water inlet connection shall be
maintained at the 35 psig ± 2.5 psig
(241.3 kPa ± 17.2 kPa) during the test.
A water pressure gauge shall be
installed in both the hot and cold water
lines to measure water pressure.’’ 10
CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix J1.
DOE believes this description is
ambiguous as to whether the nominal 35
psig water pressure is to be set under
static (non-flow) conditions and allowed
to drop during flow due to the head
losses in the line, or whether the 35 psig
is to be maintained continuously under
all flow conditions during the test. In
addition, the test procedure does not
specify where the pressure
measurement is to be taken, which
could lead to different results
depending on the pressure drops
associated with the water supply lines
between the gauge and the connection
to the clothes washer.
Tests conducted by DOE on a small
sample of both front- and top-loading
clothes washers indicate that water
supply pressure can affect water
consumption during a wash cycle, and
the effect of water supply pressure on
total water use can vary depending on
the temperature settings selected. For
tests at 10, 20, and 35 psig water supply
pressure under flow conditions, water
consumption varied by 10–30 percent
among the different pressure conditions
for either hot wash/cold rinse or cold
wash/cold rinse cycles.
The test data suggest that a water
supply pressure of 20 psig under flow
conditions results in the most consistent
water use among different cycles for a
given clothes washer. DOE believes that
20 psig may represent typical static
pressure under flow conditions that
would result from 35 psig at non-flow
conditions. DOE further believes that
these conditions may be more
representative of water supply
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
conditions that would be found in
typical residential settings than a
constant static pressure of 35 psig even
under flow conditions.
However, DOE test procedures for
other residential appliances more
closely specify the 35 psig requirement
as being applicable under flow
conditions. For example, section 2.4 of
the DOE test procedure for dishwashers
(10 CFR part 430 subpart B, appendix C)
specifies to ‘‘maintain the pressure of
the water supply at 35 ± 2.5 pounds per
square inch gauge (psig) when the water
is flowing.’’ Dishwashers and clothes
washers would likely have the same
water supply pressure when installed in
a house, so the test procedures for these
products should include consistent
water supply pressure specifications.
DOE is uncertain about which
interpretation of the water supply
pressure (i.e., 35 psig only for no-flow
conditions, or 35 psig under all flow
conditions) has been assumed by
manufacturers and certification
laboratories. DOE also lacks sufficient
information as to which interpretation
produces representative, repeatable
water consumption measurements. For
these reasons, DOE is not proposing in
today’s notice amendments to its clothes
washer test procedure to more closely
specify water supply pressure. DOE
seeks information about the conditions
under which clothes washers are
currently tested and invites comment on
the appropriate specification of the
water supply pressure.
g. Additional Revisions and
Clarifications
Section 2.6.4.5.3 of the current test
procedure discusses standards
incorporated by reference for verifying
the absence of water repellent finishes
on the energy test cloth: AATCC Test
Method 118–1997, ‘‘Oil Repellency:
Hydrocarbon Resistance Test’’ and
AATCC Test Method 79–2000,
‘‘Absorbency of Bleached Textiles.’’ 10
CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix J1.
To be consistent with referenced
standards in other DOE test procedures,
DOE proposes to remove this paragraph
from the clothes washer test procedure
and, instead, include these two AATCC
test procedures in 10 CFR 430.3,
‘‘Materials Incorporated by Reference.’’
In addition, DOE proposes adding to 10
CFR 430.3 the newly referenced AATCC
Test Method 135–2004, ‘‘Dimensional
Changes of Fabrics after Home
Laundering’’ for measuring shrinkage of
the energy test cloth.
Section 3.8.4 provides test methods
for measuring RMC for clothes washers
that have options that result in different
RMC values, such as multiple selection
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
of spin speeds or spin times. The
methodology requires conducting tests
to measure RMC at maximum spin
settings with the maximum test load
size for cold rinse and, if any, for warm
rinse, and then repeating the tests at
minimum spin settings. These tests
would result in two values of RMC at
maximum load size, which are weighted
to obtain final RMC. These two values
are currently identified as RMCmax
extraction and RMCmin extraction, which do
not correspond to the nomenclature
used in the sections from which they are
derived, sections 3.8.2 or section 3.8.3,
respectively. In those sections, the
measurement is designated as RMCmax.
DOE proposes to modify the
nomenclature in section 3.8.4 to clarify
that these are the values obtained from
either section 3.8.2 or section 3.8.3.
Section 4.1.4 of the current clothes
washer test procedure calculates the
total per-cycle hot water energy
consumption using gas-heated or oilheated water. The equation listed in this
section contains a clerical error in the
symbol for total weighted per-cycle hot
water energy consumption. DOE
proposes amending the equation to
replace the incorrect symbol, HT, with
the correct symbol, HET. DOE would
apply this amendment to both existing
appendix J1 and new appendix J2 in 10
CFR part 430 subpart B.
Section 4.5 of the current clothes
washer test procedure provides for the
calculation of Energy Factor (EF). EF
was the energy efficiency metric used to
establish energy conservation standards
for clothes washers manufactured before
January 1, 2004. 10 CFR 430.32(g). This
metric is no longer used to determine
compliance with energy conservation
standards, or in any other related
metrics. For example, the EnergyGuide
labeling requirements specify
identification of annual operating costs.
16 CFR part 305, appendix F1, appendix
F2. Annual operating cost is based on
the per-cycle energy consumption,
rather than EF or MEF. 10 CFR 430.23(j).
Therefore, DOE proposes to remove the
obsolete calculation of EF from the
clothes washer test procedure.
5. Test Procedure Performance
Specifications
The current DOE clothes washer test
procedure does not include any
provisions for evaluating the wash
quality of a clothes washer. The intent
of the test procedure is to determine the
water and energy consumption of a
clothes washer, regardless of its wash
capabilities.
In response to the August 2009
framework document, DOE received
multiple comments regarding adding
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57577
performance measures to the clothes
washer test procedure. AHAM and BSH
commented that DOE should evaluate
the feasibility of incorporating a
performance measure into the test
procedure because, according to both,
the efficiency level 4 and max-tech
MEFs and WFs proposed in the August
2009 framework document are
approaching limits at which product
performance and consumer satisfaction
may become an issue. AHAM noted it
has a standard addressing performance,
AHAM HLW–1, which is harmonized
with IEC Standard 60456, ‘‘Clothes
washing machines for household use—
Methods for measuring the
performance.’’ Additionally, AHAM and
BSH stated that Europe requires a
performance rating in addition to energy
and water consumption requirements.
BSH stated that DOE should review IEC
Standard 60456 for methods of assessing
performance. (AHAM, No. 15 at p. 2;
BSH, No. 9 at p. 1) ALS also expressed
concern that the standards have reached
a point where increased efficiency
levels will result in unacceptable
washing, rinsing, and expected
consumer utility performance,
especially in the standard capacity
vertical-axis product class. According to
ALS, washing clothes requires both
water and thermal energy, but higher
efficiency standards require decreasing
both. ALS commented that there already
appears to be ‘‘consumer backlash’’ from
some owners of high-efficiency clothes
washers regarding the ability of these
washers to clean their laundry as
expected. ALS recommended that DOE
examine AHAM HLW–1, IEC Standard
60456, and AS/NZS 2040.1 as possible
performance test procedures. (ALS, No.
12 at pp. 1–2) Whirlpool commented
that many of the candidate standard
levels in the August 2009 framework
document could only be met by
significantly compromising product
performance, and therefore provisions
to ensure proper wash performance,
rinse performance, and an absence of
fabric damage must be added to the test
procedure. The comment referenced the
AHAM test procedure, HLW–1–2007, as
a source for such performance criteria.
(Whirlpool, No. 21 at p. 2)
DOE has carefully considered these
comments and recognizes the benefits of
wash performance characterization, but
is not proposing to incorporate
measures of wash performance into the
clothes washer test procedure. As stated
in EPCA, ‘‘[a]ny test procedures
prescribed or amended under this
section shall be reasonably designed to
produce test results which measure
energy efficiency, energy use * * * or
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57578
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use * * *
and shall not be unduly burdensome to
conduct.’’ 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3). DOE
will, however, consider wash
performance and related impacts to
consumer utility in developing any
future energy conservation standards for
residential clothes washers.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
E. Compliance With Other EPCA
Requirements
1. Test Burden
As noted previously, under 42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3), EPCA requires that ‘‘[a]ny
test procedures prescribed or amended
under this section shall be reasonably
designed to produce test results which
measure energy efficiency, energy use
* * * or estimated annual operating
cost of a covered product during a
representative average use cycle or
period of use * * * and shall not be
unduly burdensome to conduct.’’ For the
reasons that follow, DOE has tentatively
concluded that amending the relevant
DOE test procedures to incorporate
clauses regarding test conditions and
methods found in IEC Standard 62301,
along with the proposed modifications
to the active washing mode test
procedure, would satisfy this
requirement.
The proposed amendments to the
DOE test procedure incorporate a test
standard that is accepted internationally
for measuring power consumption in
standby mode and off mode. Based on
its analysis of IEC Standard 62301, DOE
determined that the proposed
amendments to the clothes washer test
procedure will produce standby mode
and off mode average power
consumption measurements that are
representative of an average use cycle,
both when the measured power is stable
and when the measured power is
unstable (i.e., when the measured power
varies by 5 percent or more during 30
minutes.) Additionally, DOE is
proposing similar provisions for
measuring power in additional active
modes (delay start and cycle finished
modes). The test methods and
equipment that the amendments would
require for measuring power in these
modes are not substantially different
from the test methods and equipment
required in the current DOE test
procedure for measuring the product’s
energy consumption in active washing
mode. Therefore, the proposed test
procedure would not require
manufacturers to make a major
investment in test facilities and new
equipment. For these reasons, DOE has
tentatively concluded that the proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
amended test procedure would produce
test results that measure the standby,
off, delay start and cycle finished mode
power consumption of a clothes washer
during a representative average use
cycle, and that the test procedure would
not be unduly burdensome to conduct.
DOE is also proposing amendments to
the active washing mode portion of the
clothes washer test procedure. Because
these amendments would require
manufacturers to make the same
measurements as specified by the
current test procedure, DOE believes
that manufacturers likely would not
require additional investment or
equipment purchases to conduct the
energy testing as proposed in this
notice. The proposed water pressure
requirement may require some
manufacturers to purchase additional
pressure regulators, but DOE believes
this expense would not be significant—
on the order of hundreds of dollars. The
proposed amendments would also
require additional time to conduct,
because manufacturers would need to
test additional cycles not included in
the current test procedure, such as selfclean or steam wash cycles. DOE
believes, however, that including these
additional cycles in the test procedure
would provide for a more representative
measurement of machine energy
efficiency and water use, and that the
time commitment required to test these
additional cycles would not represent a
significant burden on manufacturers.
The current test procedure already
requires multiple energy test cycles.
Testing self-clean and steam wash
cycles, only on clothes washers offering
these features, would likely increase the
total test time for these units by
approximately 25 percent.
2. Integration of Standby Mode and Off
Mode Energy Consumption Into the
Efficiency Metrics
Section 325(gg)(2)(A) of EPCA
requires that standby mode and off
mode energy consumption be
‘‘integrated into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other
energy descriptor for each covered
product’’ unless the current test
procedures already fully account for the
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption or if such an integrated
test procedure is technically infeasible.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) DOE proposes
to incorporate the clothes washer
standby and off mode energy
consumption, in addition to energy
consumption in delay start and cycle
finished modes, into a ‘‘per-cycle
standby, off, delay start and cycle
finished mode energy consumption,’’
expressed in kWh, and into an IMEF, as
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
discussed in section III.C.5 of this
notice.
EPCA provides that test procedure
amendments adopted to comply with
the new EPCA requirements for standby
and off mode energy consumption will
not determine compliance with
previously established standards. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(C)) Because DOE is
proposing to adopt the amendments as
a new appendix J1 to 10 CFR part 430
subpart B that manufacturers would not
be required to use until the compliance
date of amended energy conservation
standards for residential clothes
washers, the test procedure
amendments pertaining to standby
mode and off mode energy consumption
that DOE proposes to adopt in this
rulemaking would not apply to, and
would have no effect on, existing
standards.
3. Commercial Clothes Washers
The test procedure for commercial
clothes washers is required to be the
same test procedure established for
residential clothes washers. (42 U.S.C.
6314(a)(8)) Thus, the test procedure set
forth in appendix J1 of subpart B of 10
CFR part 430 is also currently used to
test commercial clothes washers. (10
CFR part 431.154) If DOE were to apply
the proposed new appendix J2 to
commercial clothes washers, the
impacts would be limited to the
proposed amendments associated with
active washing mode because
commercial clothes washer standards
are based on MEF and WF. These
include proposed changes to the test
load size specification, TUFs, DUF, test
cloth specification, capacity
measurement, detergent specification,
and water supply pressure specification,
which will have some effect on the
measured energy and water efficiencies
of a commercial clothes washer. DOE
believes that the most significant
impacts could be associated with the
proposed amendments for capacity
measurement and usage factors, but
does not have information to evaluate
any impacts for commercial clothes
washers. Therefore, DOE welcomes
inputs on the effects of the proposed
amendments in appendix J2 on the
measured energy and water efficiencies
of commercial clothes washers.
F. Impact of the Proposed Amendments
on EnergyGuide and ENERGY STAR
DOE considered potential impacts of
the proposed test procedure
amendments to the FTC EnergyGuide
requirements and determined that there
will be no impact. DOE also considered
potential impacts of the proposed test
procedure amendments to the EPA/DOE
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
ENERGY STAR voluntary labeling
program. The ENERGY STAR program
for clothes washers is based on MEF and
WF. DOE notes that the calculation of
MEF could be affected by the proposed
revisions incorporating the energy and
water consumption for warm wash/
warm rinse cycles. These proposed
revisions should not affect the
calculated MEF for the majority of
clothes washers, but could have some
effect on clothes washers offering a
warm/warm temperature selection only
for cycle setting(s) other than the cycle
setting recommended by the
manufacturer for cotton or linen
clothing. The calculations of both MEF
and WF could also be affected by the
proposed revision to the clothes
container capacity measurement,
depending on how manufacturers are
currently interpreting the nonspecific
water fill level specification. As part of
the current residential clothes washer
energy conservation standards
rulemaking, DOE would analyze any
potential impact of the proposed test
procedure on calculated MEF values.
G. Elimination of the Obsolete Clothes
Washer Test Procedure
DOE proposes to delete appendix J to
subpart B of 10 CFR part 430 along with
all references to appendix J in 10 CFR
430.23. Appendix J applies only to
clothes washers manufactured before
January 1, 2004 and is therefore
obsolete. Appendix J1 to subpart B of 10
CFR part 430 provides an applicable test
procedure for all clothes washers
currently available on the market. DOE
proposes to maintain the current
naming of appendix J1, rather than
renaming it as appendix J, and to
establish new appendix J2 to simplify
the changes required. DOE has
previously used this approach of
retaining later versions of appendices to
subpart B of 10 CFR part 430 when
deleting the original version, including
appendix A1, ‘‘Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of
Electric Refrigerators and Electric
Refrigerator-Freezers,’’ and appendix B1,
‘‘Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Freezers.’’
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
Today’s regulatory action is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly,
this proposed action was not subject to
review under the Executive Order by the
Office of Information and Regulatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the proposed
rule, if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As
required by Executive Order 13272,
‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE’s
procedures and policies may be viewed
on the Office of the General Counsel’s
Web site (https://www.gc.doe.gov).
DOE reviewed today’s proposed rule
under the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. DOE has tentatively concluded
that the proposed rule would not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual
basis for this certification is as follows:
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) considers a business entity to be
small business, if, together with its
affiliates, it employs less than a
threshold number of workers specified
in 13 CFR part 121. These size standards
and codes are established by the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS). The threshold number
for NAICS classification code 335224,
which applies to household laundry
equipment manufacturers and includes
clothes washer manufacturers, is 1,000
employees. Searches of the SBA Web
site 16 to identify clothes washer
manufacturers within these NAICS
codes identified, out of approximately
17 manufacturers supplying clothes
washers in the United States, only one
small business. This small business
manufactures laundry appliances,
including clothes washers. The other
manufacturers supplying clothes
washers are large multinational
corporations.
The proposed rule would amend
DOE’s test procedure by incorporating
testing provisions to address active
mode, standby mode, and off mode
energy and water consumption that will
16 A searchable database of certified small
businesses is available online at: https://
dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57579
be used to demonstrate compliance with
energy conservation standards. The
proposed test procedure amendments
for standby, off, delay start and cycle
finished modes involve measuring
power input when the clothes washer is
in these modes. These tests can be
conducted in the same facilities used for
the current energy testing of these
products, so it is anticipated that
manufacturers would not incur any
additional facilities costs as a result of
the proposed test procedure
amendments. The power meter required
for these tests might require greater
accuracy than the power meter used for
current energy testing, but the
investment required for a possible
instrumentation upgrade is a one-time
cost, expected to be approximately a few
thousand dollars. The duration of each
test period is roughly 40 minutes
(comprising a 30-minute stabilization
period and 10-minute test period). This
is comparable to approximately half the
time required to conduct a single energy
test cycle. Each clothes washer tested
requires, on average, approximately 15
test cycles for energy testing, which
equates to about three days of testing.
For clothes washers offering all relevant
non-active washing modes—inactive,
off, delay start, and cycle finished—DOE
estimates roughly an 11-percent
increase in total test period duration.
DOE also estimates that it costs a
manufacturer approximately $2,300 on
average, including the cost of
consumables, to conduct energy testing
for a particular clothes washer. DOE
further estimates that the cost of
additional testing for non-active
washing modes would average $200 per
machine, a 9-percent increase over
current test costs. DOE believes these
additional requirements for equipment
and time and additional cost to conduct
the proposed non-active washing mode
tests would not be expected to impose
a significant economic burden on
entities subject to the applicable testing
requirements. Although the small
business has significantly lower sales
than other manufacturers over which to
amortize these additional costs, it only
produces a single platform which would
be subject to the proposed non-active
washing mode tests and thus the total
additional cost for these tests would be
on the order of $2,500.
The proposed test procedure
amendments for the active washing
mode would increase test burden by
imposing a requirement for conducting
test cycles under two additional
conditions, steam and self-clean, for
those clothes washers equipped with
such features. The testing conditions
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57580
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
and equipment for these cycles are the
same as already required for the other
energy test cycles, and manufacturers
are already required to conduct
measurements for multiple energy test
cycles. Additionally, as discussed in
section III.E.1, the additional time
required for the testing steam and selfclean cycles would increase the test
period by roughly 25 percent, from
approximately three days to nearly four
days total duration. DOE estimates that
the average test cost increment per
machine for these proposed active mode
amendments would be approximately
$600. Test burden could potentially also
be increased by the proposed
amendment to the water supply
pressure requirement if a manufacturer
were required to install additional
equipment to maintain 35 psig under
flow conditions. The cost of this
equipment, as discussed in section
III.E.1, would not be significant, on the
order of hundreds of dollars. The
proposed amendments for additional
extractor tests for determining RMC
coefficients also represent an increased
burden for the limited number of
entities that conduct such tests.
However, these tests are limited to
qualification of a new test cloth lot, and
do not need to be performed by every
manufacturer because the coefficients
are made available to the public on
DOE’s website. Therefore, DOE does not
believe these proposed amendments
would have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Because the one small business only
manufactures a single platform, it would
be subject to total additional costs of
approximately $1,000 associated with
the proposed active washing mode
amendments.
For these reasons, DOE tentatively
concludes and certifies that the
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking. DOE seeks comment on its
certification and will transmit the
certification and supporting statement
of factual basis to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the SBA for review under
5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This NOPR contains a collection-ofinformation requirement subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which
has been approved by OMB under
control number 1910–1400. Public
reporting burden for compliance
reporting for energy and water
conservation standards is estimated to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
average 30 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to DOE (see
ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to
Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this proposed rule, DOE proposes
test procedure amendments that it
expects will be used to develop and
implement future energy conservation
standards for clothes washers. DOE has
determined that this rule falls into a
class of actions that are categorically
excluded from review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE’s
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part
1021. Specifically, this rule amends an
existing rule without changing its
environmental effect and, therefore, is
covered by the Categorical Exclusion in
10 CFR part 1021, subpart D, paragraph
A5. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
imposes certain requirements on
agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt
State law or that have federalism
implications. 64 FR 43255 (August 4,
1999). The Executive Order requires
agencies to examine the constitutional
and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States,
and to carefully assess the necessity for
such actions. The Executive Order also
requires agencies to have an accountable
process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Federalism implications. On
March 14, 2000, DOE published a
statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
that it will follow in developing such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE
examined this proposed rule and
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
determined that it would not preempt
State law and would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. EPCA governs and
prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for
the products that are the subject of
today’s proposed rule. States can
petition DOE for exemption from such
preemption to the extent, and based on
criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6297(d)) Therefore, Executive Order
13132 requires no further action.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation, (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard, and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation specifies the following: (1)
The preemptive effect, if any; (2) any
effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
definitions of key terms; and (6) other
important issues affecting clarity and
general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or
whether it is unreasonable to meet one
or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to
the extent permitted by law, this
proposed rule meets the relevant
standards of Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4; 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. For a proposed regulatory
action likely to result in a rule that may
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
cause the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish estimates of the resulting
costs, benefits, and other effects on the
national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a),(b))
UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State,
local, and Tribal governments on a
proposed ‘‘significant intergovernmental
mandate,’’ and requires an agency plan
for giving notice and opportunity for
timely input to potentially affected
small governments before establishing
any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect such
governments. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its
process for intergovernmental
consultation under UMRA. 62 FR
12820. (The policy is also available at
https://www.gc.doe.gov). Today’s
proposed rule contains neither an
intergovernmental mandate nor a
mandate that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not
apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being.
Today’s proposed rule would not have
any impact on the autonomy or integrity
of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive
Order 12630, ‘‘Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights,’’ 53 FR 8859
(March 18, 1988), that this proposed
regulation would not result in any
takings that might require compensation
under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides
for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s notice under OMB and
DOE guidelines and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies
in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OIRA a Statement
of Energy Effects for any proposed
significant energy action. A ‘‘significant
energy action’’ is defined as any action
by an agency that promulgates or is
expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that (1) Is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, or any successor order; and (2)
is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any proposed
significant energy action, the agency
must give a detailed statement of any
adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use if the proposal is
implemented, and of reasonable
alternatives to the action and their
expected benefits on energy supply,
distribution, and use. Today’s proposed
regulatory action, which proposes
amendments to the test procedure for
measuring the energy efficiency of
residential clothes washers, is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 or any successor
order; would not have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy; and has
not been designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it is not a
significant energy action, and,
accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration (FEA)
Act of 1974
Under section 301 of the DOE
Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–91; 42
U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), DOE must comply
with section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974, as amended
by the Federal Energy Administration
Authorization Act of 1977 (FEAA). (15
U.S.C. 788) Section 32 essentially
provides that, where a proposed rule
authorizes or requires use of commercial
standards, the rulemaking must inform
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57581
the public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section
32(c) requires DOE to consult with the
Attorney General and the Chairman of
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on
competition.
The proposed modifications to the
test procedure addressed by this action
incorporate testing methods contained
in the commercial standard, IEC
Standard 62301. DOE has evaluated this
standard and is unable to conclude
whether it fully complies with the
requirements of section 32(b) of the
FEAA (i.e., whether it was developed in
a manner that fully provides for public
participation, comment, and review.)
DOE will consult with the Attorney
General and the Chairman of the FTC
about the impact on competition of
using the methods contained in this
standard, before prescribing a final rule.
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
The time, date, and location of the
public meeting are listed in the DATES
and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning
of this NOPR. To attend the public
meeting, please notify Ms. Brenda
Edwards at (202) 586–2945. As
explained in the ADDRESSES section,
foreign nationals visiting DOE
Headquarters are subject to advance
security screening procedures.
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To
Speak
Any person who has an interest in
today’s NOPR, or who is a
representative of a group or class of
persons that has an interest in these
issues, may request an opportunity to
make an oral presentation at the public
meeting. Such persons may handdeliver requests to speak to the address
shown in the ADDRESSES section at the
beginning of this NOPR between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Requests may
also be sent by mail or e-mail to Ms.
Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program,
Mailstop EE–2J, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0121, or Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
Persons who wish to speak should
include in their request a computer
diskette or CD in WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format
that briefly describes the nature of their
interest in this rulemaking and the
topics they wish to discuss. Such
persons should also provide a daytime
telephone number where they can be
reached.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57582
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
DOE requests persons selected to
make an oral presentation to submit an
advance copy of their statements at least
one week before the public meeting.
DOE may permit persons who cannot
supply an advance copy of their
statement to participate, if those persons
have made advance alternative
arrangements with the Building
Technologies Program. Requests to give
an oral presentation should ask for such
alternative arrangements.
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to
preside at the public meeting and may
also use a professional facilitator to aid
discussion. The meeting will not be a
judicial or evidentiary-type public
hearing, but DOE will conduct it in
accordance with section 336 of EPCA
(42 U.S.C. 6306). A court reporter will
be present to record the proceedings and
prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the
right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the
procedures governing the conduct of the
public meeting. After the public
meeting, interested parties may submit
further comments on the proceedings as
well as on any aspect of the rulemaking
until the end of the comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted
in an informal, conference style. DOE
will present summaries of comments
received before the public meeting,
allow time for presentations by
participants, and encourage all
interested parties to share their views on
issues affecting this rulemaking. Each
participant will be allowed to make a
prepared general statement (within time
limits determined by DOE), before the
discussion of specific topics. DOE will
permit other participants to comment
briefly on any general statements. At the
end of all prepared statements on each
specific topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements
briefly and comment on statements
made by others.
Participants should be prepared to
answer DOE’s and other participants’
questions. DOE representatives may also
ask participants about other matters
relevant to this rulemaking. The official
conducting the public meeting will
accept additional comments or
questions from those attending, as time
permits. The presiding official will
announce any further procedural rules
or modification of the above procedures
that may be needed for the proper
conduct of the public meeting.
DOE will make the entire record of
this proposed rulemaking, including the
transcript from the public meeting,
available for inspection at the U.S.
Department of Energy, 6th Floor, 950
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC
20024, (202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Copies of the
transcript are available for purchase
from the transcribing reporter and will
also be made available on DOE’s Web
site at https://www1.eere.energy.gov/
buildings/appliance_standards/
residential/clothes_washers.html.
D. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding the proposed rule
before or after the public meeting, but
no later than the date provided at the
beginning of this notice. Comments,
data, and information submitted to
DOE’s e-mail address for this
rulemaking should be provided in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or
text (ASCII) file format. Interested
parties should avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption,
and wherever possible comments
should include the electronic signature
of the author. Comments, data, and
information submitted to DOE via mail
or hand delivery/courier should include
one signed original paper copy. No
telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two copies: one copy of
the document that includes all of the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document with that
information deleted. DOE will
determine the confidential status of the
information and treat it accordingly.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include (1)
A description of the items, (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry, (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from
other sources, (4) whether the
information was previously made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality, (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person that would result
from public disclosure, (6) when such
information might lose its confidential
character due to the passage of time, and
(7) why disclosure of the information
would be contrary to the public interest.
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
DOE is particularly interested in
receiving comments and views of
interested parties on the following
issues:
1. Incorporation of IEC Standard
62301. DOE invites comment on the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
adequacy of IEC Standard 62301 to
measure standby and off mode power
consumption for clothes washers, and
the suitability of incorporating into DOE
regulations the specific provisions
described in section III.C.1 of this
notice;
2. Clothes washer modes. DOE invites
comment on the proposed establishment
of inactive mode as the only standby
mode for clothes washers and the
determination that ‘‘delay start mode’’
and ‘‘cycle finished mode’’ and ‘‘selfclean mode’’ would be considered
additional active modes. DOE further
invites comment on the proposed mode
definitions, including the definition of
‘‘self-clean’’ mode, and on the question
of whether there are any modes
consistent with the ‘‘active mode,’’
‘‘standby mode,’’ or ‘‘off mode’’
definitions that have not been identified
in this NOPR that represent significant
energy use (see section III.C.2.);
3. Default settings. DOE welcomes
comment on the suitability of using the
default settings in testing standby
energy consumption, and on any
methodologies that can account for
consumer actions that might increase
energy use and data on the repeatability
of such testing procedures (see section
III.C.3.);
4. Delay start mode. DOE welcomes
comment on the methodology proposed
for measuring delay start mode (see
section III.C.3);
5. Test room ambient temperature.
DOE seeks comment on the
appropriateness of the proposed
modified test room ambient temperature
range, which would allow
manufacturers to conduct standby and
off mode testing separately from
performance testing under the less
stringent ambient conditions specified
in the IEC Standard 62301 (73.4 ± 9 °F)
(see section III.C.3.);
6. Energy use calculation. DOE invites
comment on the approach for
calculating energy use for the various
operating modes for clothes washers.
DOE also invites comment on the
allocation of annual hours and test
burden, as well as the alternative
methodology for allocation of annual
hours (see section III.C.4.);
7. New integrated measures of energy
consumption and energy efficiency.
DOE invites comment on the proposed
plan to establish new integrated
measures of energy consumption for
clothes washers: ‘‘per-cycle standby, off,
delay start, and cycle finished mode
energy consumption’’ and ‘‘per-cycle
self-clean mode energy consumption,’’
expressed in kWh, and a new integrated
measure of energy efficiency for clothes
washers: ‘‘integrated modified energy
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
factor’’ expressed in ft3 per kWh per
cycle. (see section III.C.5);
8. Annual energy cost calculation.
DOE invites comment on the proposed
decision to maintain the existing annual
energy cost calculation set forth in 10
CFR 430.23, which does not include
self-clean, standby, off, delay start, or
cycle finished mode energy
consumption. One alternative way of
incorporating self-clean, standby, off,
delay start, and cycle finished mode
energy consumption in the annual
energy cost calculation would be to add
per-cycle standby, off, delay start, and
cycle finished mode energy
consumption and per-cycle self-clean
mode energy consumption to the total
per-cycle energy consumption in the
annual energy cost calculations in 10
CFR 430.23(j)(1)(i) and (ii) (see section
III.C.5);
9. Steam wash cycles. DOE requests
comment on the proposed inclusion of
the energy and water consumption of a
steam wash cycle to the clothes washer
test procedure, including the associated
use factor. DOE also requests any data
available regarding consumer use of
steam wash cycles (see section III.D.1.a);
10. Self-clean cycles. DOE invites
comment on self-clean cycles for clothes
washers, including the proposed
definition, inclusion of self-clean cycle
energy and water use into the IMEF and
IWF calculations, and on whether any
relevant data is available regarding
availability and consumer use of selfclean cycles (see section III.D.1.b);
11. Adaptive control and demand
response technologies. DOE requests
comment on whether any clothes
washers are currently available on the
market offering soil-sensing adaptive
controls or demand response features.
DOE also requests information on load
size and fabric content, the possible use
of a soiled test load to determine energy
and water use in the presence of soilsensing adaptive controls, appropriate
methodologies for measuring energy
consumption in a network mode, and
data on the repeatability of such testing
(see sections III.D.1.c and III.D.1.d);
12. Representative number of annual
cycles. DOE welcomes comment on the
appropriateness of the proposed 295
clothes washer cycles per year, and on
the validity of using the 2005
Residential Energy Consumption Survey
(RECS) to establish this estimate. DOE
also seeks any additional data available
on this issue (see section III.D.2.a);
13. Test load size specifications. DOE
invites comment on the proposed test
load sizes, and on whether the linear
relationship between test load size and
clothes washer container volume is
representative of actual consumer use.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
DOE welcomes any relevant data on this
topic (see section III.D.2.b);
14. Use factors. DOE requests
comment on the validity of the
proposed use factors for temperature,
load size, and dryer use, and of the data
sources used to estimate these values.
Additionally, DOE seeks comment on
the proposed revision to the warm rinse
measurements, including the validity of
the proposed warm wash/warm rinse
TUF of 0.27. DOE also welcomes
comment regarding the proposed load
adjustment factor to be used in the RMC
calculation. Stakeholders may submit
any additional relevant data regarding
these use factors (see section III.D.2.c);
15. Test cloth. DOE invites comment
on and data regarding the proposed
updated test cloth specifications and
correlation procedure (see section
III.D.3);
16. Capacity measurement method.
DOE welcomes comment on whether
the proposed method for measuring
clothes container capacity provides for
a representative measurement of the
volume that a dry clothes load could
occupy within the clothes container
during washer operation, and on
whether any other valid measurement
method is available (see section
III.D.4.a);
17. New integrated measure of water
consumption. DOE invites comment on
the proposal to establish a new
integrated measure of water
consumption for clothes washers,
‘‘integrated water consumption factor’’
expressed in gallons per cubic foot. DOE
requests comment on the validity of
including water consumption from all
test cycles, including self-clean cycles,
into the proposed calculation of IWF.
DOE also requests comment on whether
the IWF calculation would result in a
significant test burden (see section
III.D.4.b);
18. Energy test cycle definition. DOE
welcomes comment on the proposed
definition of the energy test cycle, and
on how manufacturers currently address
wash and rinse temperature selection
under the current definition. DOE also
requests comment on the selection
cycles to be included in the energy test
cycle under section 1.7(B) of the test
procedure to definitively account for
temperature options available only
outside the normal cycle. (see section
III.D.4.c);
19. Detergent specifications. DOE
welcomes comment on the proposed
updated detergent formulation and
associated dosage for test cloth
preconditioning (see section III.D.4.d);
20. Clothes washer for
preconditioning. DOE requests comment
on the proposed revisions to the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
57583
specifications for the clothes washer
used in test cloth preconditioning,
including whether clothes washers
currently meeting the specifications
may be rendered obsolete by potential
new residential clothes washer energy
conservation standards (see section
III.D.4.e);
21. Water supply pressure. DOE seeks
information about the conditions under
which clothes washers are currently
tested, and invites comment on the
appropriate specification of the water
supply pressure (see section III.D.4.f);
and
22. Impact on commercial clothes
washers. DOE requests comment on
how the proposed amendments in new
appendix J2 of subpart B to 10 CFR part
430 would impact the measured energy
and water efficiencies of commercial
clothes washers. DOE welcomes any
relevant data on this topic (see section
III.E.2).
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s notice of
proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Energy conservation,
Household appliances.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 27,
2010.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE proposes amending part
430 of chapter II of title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, to read as set forth
below:
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 430
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
2. Section 430.3 is amended by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (b)
through (o) as (c) through (p);
b. Adding new paragraph (b).
The additions read as follows:
§ 430.3 Materials incorporated by
reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) AATCC. American Association of
Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box
1215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
919–549–8141, or go to https://
www.aatcc.org.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57584
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(1) AATCC Test Method 79–2000,
Absorbency of Bleached Textiles,
(reaffirmed 2000), IBR approved for
Appendix J1 to Subpart B.
(2) AATCC Test Method 118–1997,
Oil Repellency: Hydrocarbon Resistance
Test, reaffirmed (1997), IBR approved
for Appendix J1 to Subpart B.
(3) AATCC Test Method 135–2004,
Dimensional Changes of Fabrics after
Home Laundering, reaffirmed (2004),
IBR approved for Appendix J1 to
Subpart B.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 430.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (j) to read as follows:
§ 430.23 Test procedures for the
measurement of energy and water
consumption.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Clothes washers. (1) The estimated
annual operating cost for automatic and
semi-automatic clothes washers shall
be—
(i) When electrically heated water is
used, the product of the following three
factors:
(A) The representative average-use of
392 cycles per year,
(B) The total per-cycle energy
consumption when electrically heated
water is used, determined according to
4.1.7 of appendix J1 before appendix J2
becomes mandatory and 4.1.7 of
appendix J2 when appendix J2 becomes
mandatory (see the note at the beginning
of appendix J2), and
(C) The representative average unit
cost in dollars per kilowatt-hour as
provided by the Secretary, the resulting
product then being rounded off to the
nearest dollar per year, and
(ii) When gas-heated or oil-heated
water is used, the product of: the
representative average-use of 392 cycles
per year and the sum of both:
(A) The product of the per-cycle
machine electrical energy consumption
in kilowatt-hours per cycle, determined
according to 4.1.6 of appendix J1 before
appendix J2 becomes mandatory and
4.1.6 of appendix J2 when appendix J2
becomes mandatory, and the
representative average unit cost in
dollars per kilowatt-hours as provided
by the Secretary, and
(B) The product of the per-cycle water
energy consumption for gas-heated or
oil-heated water in Btu per cycle,
determined according to 4.1.4 of
appendix J1 before appendix J2 becomes
mandatory and 4.1.4 of appendix J2
when appendix J2 becomes mandatory,
and the representative average unit cost
in dollars per Btu for oil or gas, as
appropriate, as provided by the
Secretary, the resulting product then
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
being rounded off to the nearest dollar
per year.
(2)(i) The modified energy factor for
automatic and semi-automatic clothes
washers is determined in accordance
with 4.4 of appendix J1 before appendix
J2 becomes mandatory and 4.6 of
appendix J2 when appendix J2 becomes
mandatory. The result shall be rounded
off to the nearest 0.01 cubic foot per
kilowatt-hours.
(ii) The integrated modified energy
factor for automatic and semi-automatic
clothes washers is determined in
accordance with 4.7 of appendix J2
when appendix J2 becomes mandatory.
The result shall be rounded off to the
nearest 0.01 cubic foot per kilowatthours.
(3) Other useful measures of energy
consumption for automatic or semiautomatic clothes washers shall be those
measures of energy consumption which
the Secretary determines are likely to
assist consumers in making purchasing
decisions and which are derived from
the application of appendix J1 before
the date that appendix J2 becomes
mandatory or appendix J2 upon the date
that appendix J2 becomes mandatory. In
addition, the annual water consumption
of a clothes washer can be determined
by the product of:
(A) The representative average-use of
392 cycles per year, and
(B) The total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for cold wash in gallons
per cycle determined according to 4.2.2
of appendix J1 before appendix J2
becomes mandatory and 4.2.12 of
appendix J2 when appendix J2 becomes
mandatory. The water consumption
factor can be determined in accordance
with 4.2.3 of appendix J1 before
appendix J2 becomes mandatory and
4.2.15 of appendix J2 when appendix J2
becomes mandatory. The integrated
water consumption factor can be
determined in accordance with 4.2.16 of
appendix J2 when appendix J2 becomes
mandatory. The remaining moisture
content can be determined in
accordance with 3.8 of appendix J1
before appendix J2 becomes mandatory
and 3.8 of appendix J2 when appendix
J2 becomes mandatory.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix J—[Removed]
4. Appendix J to subpart B of part 430
is removed.
Appendix J1—[Amended]
5. Appendix J1 to subpart B of part
430 is amended by revising the
introductory text after the heading; and
section 4.1.4. to read as follows.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Appendix J1 to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Automatic and
Semi-Automatic Clothes Washers
Appendix J1 is effective until the
compliance date of any amended standards
for residential clothes washers. After this
date, all residential clothes washers shall be
tested using the provisions of Appendix J2 of
this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Calculation of Derived Results From Test
Measurements.
*
*
*
*
*
4.1.4 Total per-cycle hot water energy
consumption using gas-heated or oil-heated
water. Calculate for the energy test cycle the
per-cycle hot water consumption, HETG,
using gas-heated or oil-heated water,
expressed in Btu per cycle (or megajoules per
cycle) and defined as:
HETG = HET × 1/e × 3412 Btu/kWh or HETG
= HET × 1/e × 3.6 MJ/kWh
Where:
e = Nominal gas or oil water heater efficiency
= 0.75.
HET = As defined in 4.1.3.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Add a new Appendix J2 to subpart
B of part 430 to read as follows:
Appendix J2 to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Automatic and
Semi-Automatic Clothes Washers
Appendix J1 is effective until the
compliance date of any amended standards
for residential clothes washers. After this
date, all residential clothes washers shall be
tested using the provisions of Appendix J2.
1. Definitions and Symbols
1.1 Active mode means a mode in which
the clothes washer is connected to a main
power source, has been activated, and is
performing one or more of the main functions
of washing, soaking, tumbling, agitating,
rinsing, and/or removing water from the
clothing, or is involved in functions
necessary for these main functions, such as
admitting water into the washer or pumping
water out of the washer. Active mode also
includes delay start, cycle finished, and selfclean modes.
1.2 Active washing mode means a mode
in which the clothes washer is performing
any of the operations included in a complete
cycle intended for washing a clothing load,
including the main functions of washing,
soaking, tumbling, agitating, rinsing, and/or
removing water from the clothing.
1.3 Adaptive control system means a
clothes washer control system, other than an
adaptive water fill control system, which is
capable of automatically adjusting washer
operation or washing conditions based on
characteristics of the clothes load placed in
the clothes container, without allowing or
requiring consumer intervention or actions.
The automatic adjustments may, for example,
include automatic selection, modification, or
control of any of the following: Wash water
temperature, agitation or tumble cycle time,
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
number of rinse cycles, and spin speed. The
characteristics of the clothes load, which
could trigger such adjustments, could, for
example, consist of or be indicated by the
presence of either soil, soap, suds, or any
other additive laundering substitute or
complementary product.
Note: Appendix J1 does not provide a
means for determining the energy
consumption of a clothes washer with an
adaptive control system. Therefore, pursuant
to 10 CFR 430.27, a waiver must be obtained
to establish an acceptable test procedure for
each such clothes washer.
1.4 Adaptive water fill control system
means a clothes washer water fill control
system which is capable of automatically
adjusting the water fill level based on the size
or weight of the clothes load placed in the
clothes container, without allowing or
requiring consumer intervention or actions.
1.5 Bone-dry means a condition of a load
of test cloth which has been dried in a dryer
at maximum temperature for a minimum of
10 minutes, removed and weighed before
cool down, and then dried again for 10
minute periods until the final weight change
of the load is 1 percent or less.
1.6 Clothes container means the
compartment within the clothes washer that
holds the clothes during the operation of the
machine.
1.7 Cold rinse means the coldest rinse
temperature available on the machine (and
should be the same rinse temperature
selection tested in 3.7 of this appendix).
1.8 Compact means a clothes washer
which has a clothes container capacity of less
than 1.6 ft 3 (45 L).
1.9 Cycle finished mode means an active
mode which provides continuous status
display following operation in active
washing mode.
1.10 Deep rinse cycle means a rinse cycle
in which the clothes container is filled with
water to a selected level and the clothes load
is rinsed by agitating it or tumbling it through
the water.
1.11 Delay start mode means an active
mode in which activation of active washing
mode is facilitated by a timer.
1.12 Energy test cycle for a basic model
means (A) the cycle recommended by the
manufacturer for washing cotton or linen
clothes, and includes all wash/rinse
temperature selections and water levels
offered in that cycle, and (B) if the cycle
described in (A) does not include all wash/
rinse temperature settings available on the
clothes washer, and required for testing as
described in this test procedure, the energy
test cycle shall also include the portions of
a cycle setting offering these wash/rinse
temperature settings with agitation/tumble
operation, spin speed(s), wash times, and
rinse times that are largely comparable to
those for the cycle recommended by the
manufacturer for washing cotton or linen
clothes. Any cycle under (A) or (B) shall
include the default agitation/tumble
operation, soil level, spin speed(s), wash
times, and rinse times applicable to that
cycle, including water heating time for water
heating clothes washers.
1.13 IEC 62301 means the test standard
published by the International
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
Electrotechnical Commission, entitled
‘‘Household electrical appliances—
Measurement of standby power,’’ Publication
62301 First Edition 2005–06 (incorporated by
reference; see § 430.3).
1.14 Inactive mode means a standby
mode that facilitates the activation of active
mode by remote switch (including remote
control), internal sensor, or timer, or that
provides continuous status display.
1.15 Integrated modified energy factor
means the quotient of the cubic foot (or liter)
capacity of the clothes container divided by
the total clothes washer energy consumption
per cycle, with such energy consumption
expressed as the sum of:
(a) The machine electrical energy
consumption;
(b) The hot water energy consumption;
(c) The energy required for removal of the
remaining moisture in the wash load;
(d) The standby mode energy consumption;
(e) The off mode energy consumption;
(f) The delay start mode energy
consumption;
(g) The cycle finished mode energy
consumption; and
(h) The self-clean energy consumption, as
applicable.
1.16 Integrated water consumption factor
means the quotient of the total clothes
washer water consumption per cycle in
gallons, with such water consumption
expressed as the sum of the total weighted
per-cycle water consumption and the percycle self-clean water consumption, divided
by the cubic foot (or liter) capacity of the
clothes washer.
1.17 Load use factor means the
percentage of the total number of wash loads
that a user would wash a particular size
(weight) load.
1.18 Manual control system means a
clothes washer control system which requires
that the consumer make the choices that
determine washer operation or washing
conditions, such as, for example, wash/rinse
temperature selections, and wash time before
starting the cycle.
1.19 Manual water fill control system
means a clothes washer water fill control
system which requires the consumer to
determine or select the water fill level.
1.20 Modified energy factor means the
quotient of the cubic foot (or liter) capacity
of the clothes container divided by the total
clothes washer energy consumption per
cycle, with such energy consumption
expressed as the sum of the machine
electrical energy consumption, the hot water
energy consumption, and the energy required
for removal of the remaining moisture in the
wash load.
1.21 Non-water-heating clothes washer
means a clothes washer which does not have
an internal water heating device to generate
hot water.
1.22 Off mode means a mode in which
the clothes washer is connected to a mains
power source and is not providing any active
or standby mode function, and where the
mode may persist for an indefinite time. An
indicator that only shows the user that the
product is in the off position is included
within the classification of an off mode.
1.23 Self-clean mode means an active
clothes washer operating mode that is:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
57585
(a) Dedicated to cleaning, deodorizing, or
sanitizing the clothes washer by eliminating
sources of odor, bacteria, mold, and mildew;
(b) Recommended to be run intermittently
by the manufacturer; and
(c) Separate from clothes washing cycles.
1.24 Spray rinse cycle means a rinse cycle
in which water is sprayed onto the clothes
for a period of time without maintaining any
specific water level in the clothes container.
1.25 Standard means a clothes washer
which has a clothes container capacity of 1.6
ft3 (45 L) or greater.
1.26 Standby mode means any modes in
which the clothes washer is connected to a
mains power source and offers one or more
of the following user oriented or protective
functions that may persist for an indefinite
time:
(a) To facilitate the activation of other
modes (including activation or deactivation
of active mode) by remote switch (including
remote control), internal sensor, or timer;
(b) Continuous functions, including
information or status displays (including
clocks) or sensor-based functions. A timer is
a continuous clock function (which may or
may not be associated with a display) that
provides regular scheduled tasks (e.g.,
switching) and that operates on a continuous
basis.
1.27 Steam cycle means a wash cycle in
which steam is injected into the clothes
container.
1.28 Symbol usage. The following
identity relationships are provided to help
clarify the symbology used throughout this
procedure.
E—Electrical Energy Consumption
H—Hot Water Consumption
C—Cold Water Consumption
R—Hot Water Consumed by Warm Rinse
TUF—Temperature Use Factor
HE—Hot Water Energy Consumption
F—Load Usage Factor
Q—Total Water Consumption
ME—Machine Electrical Energy
Consumption
RMC—Remaining Moisture Content
WI—Initial Weight of Dry Test Load
WC—Weight of Test Load After Extraction
P—Power
S—Annual Hours
s—Steam Wash
m—Extra Hot Wash (maximum wash temp.
> 135 °F (57.2 °C))
h—Hot Wash (maximum wash temp. ≤135 °F
(57.2 °C))
w—Warm Wash
c—Cold Wash (minimum wash temp.)
r—Warm Rinse (hottest rinse temp.)
sc—Self Clean
x or max—Maximum Test Load
a or avg—Average Test Load
n or min—Minimum Test Load
cf—Cycle Finished Mode
ds—Delay Start Mode
ia—Inactive Mode
o—Off Mode
oi—Combined Off and Inactive Modes
so—Combined Standby and Off Modes
The following examples are provided to
show how the above symbols can be used to
define variables:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57586
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Emx = ‘‘Electrical Energy Consumption’’ for
an Extra Hot Wash’’ and ‘‘Maximum Test
Load’’
Ra = ‘‘Hot Water Consumed by Warm Rinse’’
for the ‘‘Average Test Load’’
TUFm = ‘‘Temperature Use Factor’’ for an
‘‘Extra Hot Wash’’
HEmin = ‘‘Hot Water Energy Consumption’’ for
the ‘‘Minimum Test Load’’
Qsc = ‘‘Total Water Consumption’’ for ‘‘Self
Clean’’
Pds = ‘‘Power’’ in ‘‘Delay Start Mode’’
So = ‘‘Annual Hours’’ in ‘‘Off Mode’’
1.29 Temperature use factor means, for a
particular wash/rinse temperature setting, the
percentage of the total number of wash loads
that an average user would wash with that
setting.
1.30 Thermostatically controlled water
valves means clothes washer controls that
have the ability to sense and adjust the hot
and cold supply water.
1.31 Uniformly distributed warm wash
temperature selection(s) means (A) multiple
warm wash selections for which the warm
wash water temperatures have a linear
relationship with all discrete warm wash
selections when the water temperatures are
plotted against equally spaced consecutive
warm wash selections between the hottest
warm wash and the coldest warm wash. If
the warm wash has infinite selections, the
warm wash water temperature has a linear
relationship with the distance on the
selection device (e.g. dial angle or slide
movement) between the hottest warm wash
and the coldest warm wash. The criteria for
a linear relationship as specified above is that
the difference between the actual water
temperature at any warm wash selection and
the point where that temperature is depicted
on the temperature/selection line formed by
connecting the warmest and the coldest
warm selections is less than ± 5 percent. In
all cases, the mean water temperature of the
warmest and the coldest warm selections
must coincide with the mean of the ‘‘hot
wash’’ (maximum wash temperature ≤ 135 °F
(57.2 °C)) and ‘‘cold wash’’ (minimum wash
temperature) water temperatures within ± 3.8
°F (± 2.1 °C); or (B) on a clothes washer with
only one warm wash temperature selection,
a warm wash temperature selection with a
water temperature that coincides with the
mean of the ‘‘hot wash’’ (maximum wash
temperature ≤ 135 °F (57.2 °C)) and ‘‘cold
wash’’ (minimum wash temperature) water
temperatures within ± 3.8 °F (± 2.1 °C).
1.32 Warm rinse means the hottest rinse
temperature available on the machine.
1.33 Warm wash means all wash
temperature selections that are below the
maximum wash temperature ≤ 135 °F (57.2
°C) and above the minimum wash
temperature.
1.34 Water consumption factor means the
quotient of the total weighted per-cycle water
consumption divided by the cubic foot (or
liter) capacity of the clothes washer.
1.35 Water-heating clothes washer means
a clothes washer where some or all of the hot
water for clothes washing is generated by a
water heating device internal to the clothes
washer.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
2. Testing Conditions
2.1 Installation. Install the clothes washer
in accordance with manufacturer’s
instructions.
2.2 Electrical energy supply.
2.2.1 Supply voltage and frequency.
Maintain the electrical supply at the clothes
washer terminal block within 2 percent of
120, 120/240, or 120/208Y volts as applicable
to the particular terminal block wiring
system and within 2 percent of the nameplate
frequency as specified by the manufacturer.
If the clothes washer has a dual voltage
conversion capability, conduct test at the
highest voltage specified by the
manufacturer.
2.2.2 Supply voltage waveform. For the
standby, off, delay start, and cycle finished
mode testing, maintain the electrical supply
voltage waveform indicated in section 4,
paragraph 4.4 of IEC 62301 (incorporated by
reference; see § 430.3).
2.3 Supply Water.
2.3.1 Clothes washers in which electrical
energy consumption or water energy
consumption are affected by the inlet water
temperature. (For example, water heating
clothes washers or clothes washers with
thermostatically controlled water valves.).
The temperature of the hot water supply at
the water inlets shall not exceed 135 °F (57.2
°C) and the cold water supply at the water
inlets shall not exceed 60 °F (15.6 °C). A
water meter shall be installed in both the hot
and cold water lines to measure water
consumption.
2.3.2 Clothes washers in which electrical
energy consumption and water energy
consumption are not affected by the inlet
water temperature. The temperature of the
hot water supply shall be maintained at 135
°F ± 5 °F (57.2 °C ± 2.8 °C) and the cold water
supply shall be maintained at 60 °F ± 5 °F
(15.6 °C ± 2.8 °C). A water meter shall be
installed in both the hot and cold water lines
to measure water consumption.
2.4 Water pressure. The static water
pressure at the hot and cold water inlet
connection of the clothes washer shall be
maintained at 35 pounds per square inch
gauge (psig) ± 2.5 psig (241.3 kPa ± 17.2 kPa)
when the water is flowing. The static water
pressure for a single water inlet connection
shall be maintained at 35 psig ± 2.5 psig
(241.3 kPa ± 17.2 kPa) when the water is
flowing. A water pressure gauge shall be
installed in both the hot and cold water lines
to measure water pressure.
2.5 Instrumentation. Perform all test
measurements using the following
instruments as appropriate:
2.5.1 Weighing scales.
2.5.1.1 Weighing scale for test cloth. The
scale shall have a resolution of no larger than
0.2 oz (5.7 g) and a maximum error no greater
than 0.3 percent of the measured value.
2.5.1.2 Weighing scale for clothes
container capacity measurement. The scale
should have a resolution no larger than 0.50
lbs (0.23 kg) and a maximum error no greater
than 0.5 percent of the measured value.
2.5.2 Watt-hour meter. The watt-hour
meter shall have a resolution no larger than
1 Wh (3.6 kJ) and a maximum error no greater
than 2 percent of the measured value for any
demand greater than 50 Wh (180.0 kJ).
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2.5.3 Watt meter. The watt meter used to
measure standby, off, delay start, and cycle
finished mode power consumption shall
have the resolution specified in section 4,
paragraph 4.5 of IEC 62301 (incorporated by
reference, see § 430.3). The watt meter shall
also be able to record a ‘‘true’’ average power
as specified in section 5, paragraph 5.3.2(a)
of IEC 62301.
2.5.4 Temperature measuring device. The
device shall have an error no greater than ±
1 °F (± 0.6 °C) over the range being measured.
2.5.5 Water meter. The water meter shall
have a resolution no larger than 0.1 gallons
(0.4 liters) and a maximum error no greater
than 2 percent for the water flow rates being
measured.
2.5.6 Water pressure gauge. The water
pressure gauge shall have a resolution of 1
pound per square inch gauge (psig) (6.9 kPa)
and shall have an error no greater than 5
percent of any measured value.
2.6 Test cloths.
2.6.1 Energy Test Cloth. The energy test
cloth shall be made from energy test cloth
material, as specified in 2.6.4, that is 24 ± 1⁄2
inches by 36 ± 1⁄2 inches (61.0 ± 1.3 cm by
91.4 ± 1.3 cm) and has been hemmed to 22
± 1⁄2 inches by 34 ± 1⁄2 inches (55.9 ± 1.3 cm
by 86.4 ± 1.3 cm) before washing. The energy
test cloth shall be clean and shall not be used
for more than 60 test runs (after
preconditioning as specified in 2.6.3 of this
appendix). All energy test cloth must be
permanently marked identifying the lot
number of the material. Mixed lots of
material shall not be used for testing the
clothes washers.
2.6.2 Energy Stuffer Cloth. The energy
stuffer cloth shall be made from energy test
cloth material, as specified in 2.6.4, and shall
consist of pieces of material that are 12 ± 1⁄4
inches by 12 ± 1⁄4 inches (30.5 ± 0.6 cm by
30.5 ± 0.6 cm) and have been hemmed to 10
± 1⁄4 inches by 10 ± 1⁄4 inches (25.4 ± 0.6 cm
by 25.4 ± 0.6 cm) before washing. The energy
stuffer cloth shall be clean and shall not be
used for more than 60 test runs (after
preconditioning as specified in 2.6.3 of this
appendix). All energy stuffer cloth must be
permanently marked identifying the lot
number of the material. Mixed lots of
material shall not be used for testing the
clothes washers.
2.6.3 Preconditioning of Test Cloths. The
new test cloths, including energy test cloths
and energy stuffer cloths, shall be preconditioned in a clothes washer in the
following manner:
2.6.3.1 Perform 5 complete normal washrinse-spin cycles, the first two with current
AHAM Standard detergent Formula 3 and the
last three without detergent. Place the test
cloth in a clothes washer set at the maximum
water level. Wash the load for ten minutes in
soft water (17 ppm hardness or less) using
27.0 grams + 4.0 grams per lb of cloth load
of AHAM Standard detergent Formula 3. The
wash temperature is to be controlled to 135
°F ± 5 °F (57.2 °C ± 2.8 °C) and the rinse
temperature is to be controlled to 60 °F ± 5
°F (15.6 °C ± 2.8 °C). Repeat the cycle with
detergent and then repeat the cycle three
additional times without detergent, bone
drying the load between cycles (total of five
wash and rinse cycles).
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57587
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
2.6.4 Energy test cloth material. The energy
test cloths and energy stuffer cloths shall be
made from fabric meeting the following
specifications. The material should come
from a roll of material with a width of
approximately 63 inches and approximately
500 yards per roll. However, other sizes may
be used if they fall within the specifications.
2.6.4.1 Nominal fabric type. Pure finished
bleached cloth made with a momie or granite
weave, which is nominally 50 percent cotton
and 50 percent polyester.
2.6.4.2 The fabric weight specification
shall be 5.60 ± 0.25 ounces per square yard
(190.0 ± 8.4 g/m2).
2.6.4.3 The thread count shall be 65 × 57
per inch (warp × fill), ±2 percent.
2.6.4.4 The warp yarn and filling yarn
shall each have fiber content of 50 percent
± 4 percent cotton, with the balance being
polyester, and be open end spun, 15/1 ± 5
percent cotton count blended yarn.
2.6.4.5 Water repellent finishes, such as
fluoropolymer stain resistant finishes shall
2.6.4.6.1 Repeat the Standard Extractor
RMC Test in 2.6.5 of this appendix three
times.
2.6.4.6.2 An RMC correction curve shall
be calculated as specified in 2.6.6 of this
appendix.
2.6.4.7 The maximum shrinkage after
preconditioning shall not be more than 5
percent on the length and width. Measure per
AATCC Test Method 135–2004, Dimensional
Changes of Fabrics after Home Laundering
(incorporated by reference; see § 430.3).
2.6.5 Standard Extractor RMC Test
Procedure. The following procedure is used
to evaluate the moisture absorption and
retention characteristics of a lot of test cloth
by measuring the RMC in a standard
extractor at a specified set of conditions.
Table 2.6.5 of this appendix is the matrix of
test conditions. When this matrix is repeated
3 times, a total of 60 extractor RMC test runs
are required. For the purpose of the extractor
RMC test, the test cloths may be used for up
to 60 test runs (after preconditioning as
specified in 2.6.3 of this appendix).
not be applied to the test cloth. The absence
of such finishes shall be verified by:
2.6.4.5.1 American Association of Textile
Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) Test
Method 118–1997, Oil Repellency:
Hydrocarbon Resistance Test (incorporated
by reference; see § 430.3), of each new lot of
test cloth (when purchased from the mill) to
confirm the absence of ScotchguardTM or
other water repellent finish (required scores
of ‘‘D’’ across the board).
2.6.4.5.2 American Association of Textile
Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) Test
Method 79–2000, Absorbency of Bleached
Textiles (incorporated by reference; see
§ 430.3), of each new lot of test cloth (when
purchased from the mill) to confirm the
absence of ScotchguardTM or other water
repellent finish (time to absorb one drop
should be on the order of 1 second).
2.6.4.6 The moisture absorption and
retention shall be evaluated for each new lot
of test cloth by the Standard Extractor
Remaining Moisture Content (RMC) Test
specified in 2.6.5 of this appendix.
TABLE 2.6.5—MATRIX OF EXTRACTOR RMC TEST CONDITIONS
Warm soak
Cold soak
15 min. spin
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
100
200
350
500
650
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
2.6.5.1 The standard extractor RMC tests
shall be run in a North Star Engineered
Products Inc. (formerly Bock) Model 215
extractor (having a basket diameter of 19.5
inches, length of 12 inches, and volume of
2.1 ft3), with a variable speed drive (North
Star Engineered Products, P.O. Box 5127,
Toledo, OH 43611) or an equivalent extractor
with same basket design (i.e. diameter,
length, volume, and hole configuration) and
variable speed drive.
2.6.5.2 Test Load. Test cloths shall be
preconditioned in accordance with 2.6.3 of
this appendix. The load size shall be 8.4 lbs,
consistent with 3.8.1 of this appendix.
2.6.5.3 Procedure.
2.6.5.3.1 Record the ‘‘bone-dry’’ weight of
the test load (WI).
2.6.5.3.2 Prepare the test load for soak by
grouping four test cloths into loose bundles.
Bundles are created by hanging four cloths
vertically from one corner and loosely
wrapping the test cloth onto itself to form the
bundle. Bundles are then placed into the
water for soak. Eight to nine bundles will be
formed depending on the test load. The ninth
bundle may not equal four cloths but can
4 min. spin
15 min. spin
4 min. spin
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
incorporate energy stuffer cloths to help
offset the size difference.
2.6.5.3.3 Soak the test load for 20 minutes
in 10 gallons of soft (< 17 ppm) water. The
entire test load shall be submerged. The
water temperature shall be 100 ßF ± 5 °F (38
°C ± 3 °C)
2.6.5.3.4 Remove the test load and allow
each of the test cloth bundles to drain over
the water bath for a maximum of 5 seconds.
2.6.5.3.5 Manually place the test cloth
bundles in the basket of the extractor,
distributing them evenly by eye. The
draining and loading process should take less
than 1 minute. Spin the load at a fixed speed
corresponding to the intended centripetal
acceleration level (measured in units of the
acceleration of gravity, g) ± 1g for the
intended time period ± 5 seconds.
2.6.5.3.6 Record the weight of the test
load immediately after the completion of the
extractor spin cycle (WC).
2.6.5.3.7 Calculate the RMC as (WC–WI)/
WI.
2.6.5.3.8 It is not necessary to drain the
soak tub if the water bath is corrected for
water level and temperature before the next
extraction.
2.6.5.3.9 It is not necessary to dry the test
load in between extraction runs. However,
the bone dry weight shall be checked after
every 12 extraction runs to make sure the
bone dry weight is within tolerance (8.4 ± 0.1
lb).
2.6.5.3.10 The RMC of the test load shall
be measured at five g levels: 100 g, 200 g, 350
g, 500 g, and 650 g, using two different spin
times at each g level: 4 minutes and 15
minutes.
2.6.5.4 Repeat 2.6.5.3 of this appendix
using soft (< 17 ppm) water at 60 °F ± 5 °F.
2.6.6 Calculation of RMC correction
curve.
2.6.6.1 Average the values of 3 test runs
and fill in Table 2.6.5 of this appendix.
Perform a linear least-squares fit to relate the
standard RMC (RMCstandard) values (shown in
Table 2.6.6.1 of this appendix) to the values
measured in 2.6.5 of this appendix:
(RMCcloth): RMCstandard ¥ A × RMCcloth + B
Where A and B are coefficients of the linear
least-squares fit.
TABLE 2.6.6.1—STANDARD RMC VALUES (RMC STANDARD)
RMC percentage
‘‘g Force’’
Warm soak
15 min. spin
100 ...................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cold soak
4 min. spin
45.9
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
49.9
21SEP2
15 min. spin
49.7
4 min. spin
52.8
57588
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2.6.6.1—STANDARD RMC VALUES (RMC STANDARD)—Continued
RMC percentage
‘‘g Force’’
Warm soak
15 min. spin
200
350
500
650
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
2.6.6.2 Perform an analysis of variance
test using two factors, spin speed and lot, to
check the interaction of speed and lot. Use
the values from Table 2.6.5 and Table 2.6.6.1
in the calculation. The ‘‘P’’ value in the
variance analysis shall be greater than or
equal to 0.1. If the ‘‘P’’ value is less than 0.1,
the test cloth is unacceptable. ‘‘P’’ is a
theoretically based probability of interaction
based on an analysis of variance.
2.6.7 Application of the RMC correction
curve.
Cold soak
4 min. spin
35.7
29.6
24.2
23.0
15 min. spin
40.4
33.1
28.7
26.4
2.6.7.1 Using the coefficients A and B
calculated in 2.6.6.1 of this appendix:
RMCcorr = A × RMC + B
2.6.7.2 Substitute RMCcorr values in
calculations in 3.8 of this appendix.
2.7 Test Load Sizes. Maximum,
minimum, and, when required, average test
load sizes shall be determined using Table
5.1 of this appendix and the clothes
container capacity as measured in 3.1.1
through 3.1.5. Test loads shall consist of
4 min. spin
37.9
30.7
25.5
24.1
43.1
35.8
30.0
28.0
energy test cloths, except that adjustments to
the test loads to achieve proper weight can
be made by the use of energy stuffer cloths
with no more than 5 stuffer cloths per load.
2.8 Use of Test Loads. Table 2.8 defines
the test load sizes and corresponding water
fill settings which are to be used when
measuring water and energy consumptions.
Adaptive water fill control system and
manual water fill control system are defined
in section 1 of this appendix:
TABLE 2.8—TEST LOAD SIZES AND WATER FILL SETTINGS REQUIRED
Manual water fill control system
Adaptive water fill control system
Water fill setting
Test load size
Max .................................................
Max .................................................
Max .................................................
Min ..................................................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Test load size
Min ..................................................
Avg .................................................
Min ..................................................
2.8.1 The test load sizes to be used to
measure RMC are specified in section 3.8.1.
2.8.2 Test loads for energy and water
consumption measurements shall be bone
dry prior to the first cycle of the test, and
dried to a maximum of 104 percent of bone
dry weight for subsequent testing.
2.8.3 Load the energy test cloths by
grasping them in the center, shaking them to
hang loosely and then put them into the
clothes container prior to activating the
clothes washer.
2.9 Pre-conditioning.
2.9.1 Non-water-heating clothes washer.
If the clothes washer has not been filled with
water in the preceding 96 hours, precondition it by running it through a cold
rinse cycle and then draining it to ensure that
the hose, pump, and sump are filled with
water.
2.9.2 Water-heating clothes washer. If the
clothes washer has not been filled with water
in the preceding 96 hours, or if it has not
been in the test room at the specified ambient
conditions for 8 hours, pre-condition it by
running it through a cold rinse cycle and
then draining it to ensure that the hose,
pump, and sump are filled with water.
2.10 Wash time setting. If one wash time
is prescribed in the energy test cycle, that
shall be the wash time setting; otherwise, the
wash time setting shall be the higher of either
the minimum or 70 percent of the maximum
wash time available in the energy test cycle.
2.11 Test room temperature.
2.11.1 Non-water-heating clothes washer.
For standby, off, delay start, and cycle
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
finished mode testing, maintain room
ambient air temperature conditions as
specified in section 4, paragraph 4.2 of IEC
62301 (incorporated by reference; see
§ 430.3).
2.11.2 Water-heating clothes washer.
Maintain the test room ambient air
temperature at 75 °F ± 5 °F (23.9 °C ± 2.8 °C).
For standby, off, delay start, and cycle
finished mode testing, maintain room
ambient air temperature conditions as
specified in section 4, paragraph 4.2 of IEC
62301 (incorporated by reference; see
§ 430.3).
2.12 Bone dryer temperature. The dryer
used for bone drying must heat the test cloth
and energy stuffer cloths above 210 °F (99
°C).
3. Test Measurements
3.1 Clothes container capacity. Measure
the entire volume which a dry clothes load
could occupy within the clothes container
during washer operation according to the
following procedures:
3.1.1 Place the clothes washer in such a
position that the uppermost edge of the
clothes container opening is leveled
horizontally, so that the container will hold
the maximum amount of water.
3.1.2 Line the inside of the clothes
container with 2 mil (0.051 mm) plastic
sheet. All clothes washer components which
occupy space within the clothes container
and which are recommended for use with the
energy test cycle shall be in place and shall
be lined with 2 mil (0.051 mm) plastic sheet
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Water fill setting
As determined by the Clothes
Washer.
to prevent water from entering any void
space.
3.1.3 Record the total weight of the
machine before adding water.
3.1.4 Fill the clothes container manually
with either 60 °F ± 5 °F (15.6 °C ± 2.8 °C)
or 100 °F ± 10 °F (37.8 °C ± 5.5 °C) water,
with the door open. For a top-loading,
vertical-axis clothes washer, fill the clothes
container to the uppermost edge of the
rotating portion, including any balance ring.
For a front-loading, horizontal-axis clothes
washer, fill the clothes container to the
uppermost edge that is in contact with the
door seal. For all clothes washers, any
volume which cannot be occupied by the
clothing load during operation must be
excluded from the measurement. Measure
and record the weight of water, W, in
pounds.
3.1.5 The clothes container capacity is
calculated as follows:
C = W/d
Where:
C = Capacity in cubic feet (liters).
W = Mass of water in pounds (kilograms).
d = Density of water (62.0 lbs/ft3 for 100 °F
(993 kg/m3 for 37.8 °C) or 62.3 lbs/ft3 for
60 °F (998 kg/m3 for 15.6 °C)).
3.2 Procedure for measuring water and
energy consumption values on all automatic
and semi-automatic washers. All energy
consumption tests shall be performed under
the energy test cycle(s), unless otherwise
specified. Table 3.2 of this appendix defines
the sections below which govern tests of
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57589
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
particular clothes washers, based on the
number of wash/rinse temperature selections
available on the model, and also, in some
instances, method of water heating. The
procedures prescribed are applicable
regardless of a clothes washer’s washing
capacity, loading port location, primary axis
of rotation of the clothes container, and type
of control system.
3.2.1 Inlet water temperature and the
wash/rinse temperature settings.
3.2.1.1 For automatic clothes washers set
the wash/rinse temperature selection control
to obtain the wash water temperature
selection control to obtain the wash water
temperature desired (extra hot, hot, warm, or
cold) and cold rinse, and open both the hot
and cold water faucets.
3.2.1.2 For semi-automatic washers: (1)
For hot water temperature, open the hot
water faucet completely and close the cold
water faucet; (2) for warm inlet water
temperature, open both hot and cold water
faucets completely; (3) for cold water
temperature, close the hot water faucet and
open the cold water faucet completely.
3.2.1.3 Determination of warm wash
water temperature(s) to decide whether a
clothes washer has uniformly distributed
warm wash temperature selections. The wash
water temperature, Tw, of each warm water
wash selection shall be calculated or
measured.
For non-water heating clothes washers,
calculate Tw as follows:
Tw(°F) = ((Hw × 135 °F) + (Cw × 60 °F))/(Hw
+ Cw)
or
Tw(°C) = ((Hw × 57.2 °C) + (Cw × 15.6 °C))/
(Hw + Cw)
Where:
Hw = Hot water consumption of a warm
wash.
Cw = Cold water consumption of a warm
wash.
For water-heating clothes washers,
measure and record the temperature of each
warm wash selection after fill.
3.2.2 Total water consumption during the
energy test cycle shall be measured,
including hot and cold water consumption
during wash, deep rinse, and spray rinse.
3.2.3 Clothes washers with adaptive
water fill/manual water fill control systems.
3.2.3.1 Clothes washers with adaptive
water fill control system and alternate
manual water fill control systems. If a clothes
washer with an adaptive water fill control
system allows consumer selection of manual
controls as an alternative, then both manual
and adaptive modes shall be tested and, for
each mode, the energy consumption (HET,
MET, and DE) and water consumption (QT),
values shall be calculated as set forth in
section 4. Then the average of the two values
(one from each mode, adaptive and manual)
for each variable shall be used in section 4
for the clothes washer.
3.2.3.2 Clothes washers with adaptive
water fill control system.
3.2.3.2.1 Not user adjustable. The
maximum, minimum, and average water
levels as defined in the following sections
shall be interpreted to mean that amount of
water fill which is selected by the control
system when the respective test loads are
used, as defined in Table 2.8 of this
appendix. The load usage factors which shall
be used when calculating energy
consumption values are defined in Table
4.1.3 of this appendix.
3.2.3.2.2 User adjustable. Four tests shall
be conducted on clothes washers with user
adjustable adaptive water fill controls which
affect the relative wash water levels. The first
test shall be conducted with the maximum
test load and with the adaptive water fill
control system set in the setting that will give
the most energy intensive result. The second
test shall be conducted with the minimum
test load and with the adaptive water fill
control system set in the setting that will give
the least energy intensive result. The third
test shall be conducted with the average test
load and with the adaptive water fill control
system set in the setting that will give the
most energy intensive result for the given test
load. The fourth test shall be conducted with
the average test load and with the adaptive
water fill control system set in the setting
that will give the least energy intensive result
for the given test load. The energy and water
consumption for the average test load and
water level shall be the average of the third
and fourth tests.
3.2.3.3 Clothes washers with manual
water fill control system. In accordance with
Table 2.8 of this appendix, the water fill
selector shall be set to the maximum water
level available on the clothes washer for the
maximum test load size and set to the
minimum water level for the minimum test
load size. The load usage factors which shall
be used when calculating energy
consumption values are defined in Table
4.1.3 of this appendix.
TABLE 3.2—TEST SECTION REFERENCE
Max. Wash Temp. Available ............................................................................................
Number of Wash Temp. Selections .................................................................................
Test Sections Required to be Followed ..........................................................................
≤ 135 °F (57.2 °C)
1
............
............
............
3.6
............
3.8
............
2
............
3.4
............
3.6
............
3.8
............
>2
............
3.4
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
............
**>135
°F (57.2 °C)
3
3.3
....................
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
†3.9
>3
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
* 3.7
3.8
†3.9
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Only applicable to machines with warm rinse.
** Only applicable to water heating clothes washers on which the maximum wash temperature available exceeds 135 °F (57.2 °C).
† Only applicable to machines equipped with a steam cycle.
3.3 ‘‘Extra Hot Wash’’ (Max Wash Temp
>135 °F (57.2 °C)) for water heating clothes
washers only. Water and electrical energy
consumption shall be measured for each
water fill level and/or test load size as
specified in 3.3.1 through 3.3.3 for the hottest
wash setting available.
3.3.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hmx), cold water
consumption (Cmx), and electrical energy
consumption (Emx) shall be measured for an
extra hot wash/cold rinse energy test cycle,
with the controls set for the maximum water
fill level. The maximum test load size is to
be used and shall be determined per Table
5.1 of this appendix.
3.3.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hmn), cold water
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
consumption (Cmn), and electrical energy
consumption (Emn) shall be measured for an
extra hot wash/cold rinse energy test cycle,
with the controls set for the minimum water
fill level. The minimum test load size is to
be used and shall be determined per Table
5.1 of this appendix.
3.3.3 Average test load and water fill. For
clothes washers with an adaptive water fill
control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hma), cold water
consumption (Cma), and electrical energy
consumption (Ema) for an extra hot wash/
cold rinse energy test cycle, with an average
test load size as determined per Table 5.1 of
this appendix.
3.4 ‘‘Hot Wash’’ (Max Wash Temp ≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)). Water and electrical energy
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
consumption shall be measured for each
water fill level or test load size as specified
in 3.4.1 through 3.4.3 for a 135 °F (57.2 °C)
wash, if available, or for the hottest selection
less than 135 °F (57.2 °C).
3.4.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hhx), cold water
consumption (Chx), and electrical energy
consumption (Ehx) shall be measured for a
hot wash/cold rinse energy test cycle, with
the controls set for the maximum water fill
level. The maximum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.4.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hhn), cold water
consumption (Chn), and electrical energy
consumption (Ehn) shall be measured for a
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
57590
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
hot wash/cold rinse energy test cycle, with
the controls set for the minimum water fill
level. The minimum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.4.3 Average test load and water fill. For
clothes washers with an adaptive water fill
control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hha), cold water
consumption (Cha), and electrical energy
consumption (Eha) for a hot wash/cold rinse
energy test cycle, with an average test load
size as determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.5 ‘‘Warm Wash.’’ Water and electrical
energy consumption shall be determined for
each water fill level and/or test load size as
specified in 3.5.1 through 3.5.2.3 for the
applicable warm water wash temperature(s)
with a cold rinse.
3.5.1 Clothes washers with uniformly
distributed warm wash temperature
selection(s). The reportable values to be used
for the warm water wash setting shall be the
arithmetic average of the measurements for
the hot and cold wash selections. This is a
calculation only, no testing is required.
3.5.2 Clothes washers that lack uniformly
distributed warm wash temperature
selections. For a clothes washer with fewer
than four discrete warm wash selections, test
all warm wash temperature selections. For a
clothes washer that offers four or more warm
wash selections, test at all discrete selections,
or test at 25 percent, 50 percent, and 75
percent positions of the temperature
selection device between the hottest hot
(≤135 °F (57.2 °C)) wash and the coldest cold
wash. If a selection is not available at the 25,
50 or 75 percent position, in place of each
such unavailable selection use the next
warmer setting. Each reportable value to be
used for the warm water wash setting shall
be the arithmetic average of all tests
conducted pursuant to this section.
3.5.2.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hwx), cold water
consumption (Cwx), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewx) shall be measured with
the controls set for the maximum water fill
level. The maximum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.5.2.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hwn), cold water
consumption (Cwn), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewn) shall be measured with
the controls set for the minimum water fill
level. The minimum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.5.2.3 Average test load and water fill.
For clothes washers with an adaptive water
fill control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hwa), cold water
consumption (Cwa), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewa) with an average test load
size as determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.6 ‘‘Cold Wash’’ (Minimum Wash
Temperature Selection). Water and electrical
energy consumption shall be measured for
each water fill level or test load size as
specified in 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 for the
coldest wash temperature selection available.
3.6.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hcx), cold water
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
consumption (Ccx), and electrical energy
consumption (Ecx) shall be measured for a
cold wash/cold rinse energy test cycle, with
the controls set for the maximum water fill
level. The maximum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.6.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hcn), cold water
consumption (Ccn), and electrical energy
consumption (Ecn) shall be measured for a
cold wash/cold rinse energy test cycle, with
the controls set for the minimum water fill
level. The minimum test load size is to be
used and shall be determined per Table 5.1
of this appendix.
3.6.3 Average test load and water fill. For
clothes washers with an adaptive water fill
control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hca), cold water
consumption (Cca), and electrical energy
consumption (Eca) for a cold wash/cold rinse
energy test cycle, with an average test load
size as determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.7 ‘‘Warm Wash/Warm Rinse.’’ Water
and electrical energy consumption shall be
determined for each water fill level and/or
test load size as specified in 3.7.2.1 through
3.7.2.3 for the applicable warm wash
temperature selection as described in 3.7.1 or
3.7.2 and the hottest available rinse
temperature selection.
3.7.1 Clothes washers with uniformly
distributed warm wash temperature
selection(s). Test the warm wash warm rinse
cycle at the wash temperature selection with
the temperature selection device at the 50
percent position between the hottest hot
(≤135 °F (57.2 °C)) wash and the coldest cold
wash.
3.7.2 Clothes washers that lack uniformly
distributed warm wash temperature
selections. For a clothes washer with fewer
than four discrete warm wash selections, test
all warm wash temperature selections. For a
clothes washer that offers four or more warm
wash selections, test at all discrete selections,
or test at 25 percent, 50 percent, and 75
percent positions of the temperature
selection device between the hottest hot
(≤135 °F (57.2 °C)) wash and the coldest cold
wash. If a selection is not available at the 25,
50, or 75 percent position, in place of each
such unavailable selection use the next
warmer setting. Each reportable value to be
used for the warm water wash setting shall
be the arithmetic average of all tests
conducted pursuant to this section.
3.7.2.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hwwx), cold water
consumption (Cwwx), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewwx) shall be measured with
the controls set for the maximum water fill
level. The maximum test load size is to be
used and shall be determine per Table 5.1 of
this appendix.
3.7.2.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hwwn), cold water
consumption (Cwwn), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewwn) shall be measured with
the controls set for the minimum water fill
level. The minimum test load size is to be
used and shall be determine per Table 5.1 of
this appendix.
3.7.2.3 Average test load and water fill.
For clothes washers with an adaptive water
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
fill control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hwwa), cold water
consumption (Cwwa), and electrical energy
consumption (Ewwa) with an average test
load size as determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.8 Remaining Moisture Content:
3.8.1 The wash temperature will be the
same as the rinse temperature for all testing.
Use the maximum test load as defined in
Table 5.1 of this appendix and section 3.1 for
testing.
3.8.2 For clothes washers with cold rinse
only:
3.8.2.1 Record the actual ‘‘bone dry’’
weight of the test load (WImax), then place the
test load in the clothes washer.
3.8.2.2 Set water level selector to
maximum fill.
3.8.2.3 Run the energy test cycle.
3.8.2.4 Record the weight of the test load
immediately after completion of the energy
test cycle (WCmax).
3.8.2.5 Calculate the remaining moisture
content of the maximum test load, RMCmax,
expressed as a percentage and defined as:
RMCmax = ((WCmax–WImax)/WImax) × 100%
3.8.3 For clothes washers with cold and
warm rinse options:
3.8.3.1 Complete steps 3.8.2.1 through
3.8.2.4 for cold rinse. Calculate the remaining
moisture content of the maximum test load
for cold rinse, RMCCOLD, expressed as a
percentage and defined as:
RMCCOLD = ((WCmax–WImax)/WImax) × 100%
3.8.3.2 Complete steps 3.8.2.1 through
3.8.2.4 for warm rinse. Calculate the
remaining moisture content of the maximum
test load for warm rinse, RMCWARM,
expressed as a percentage and defined as:
RMCWARM = ((WCmax–WImax)/WImax) × 100%
3.8.3.3 Calculate the remaining moisture
content of the maximum test load, RMCmax,
expressed as a percentage and defined as:
RMCmax = RMC COLD × (1–TUFr) + RMCWARM
× (TUFr)
Where:
TUFr is the temperature use factor for warm
rinse as defined in Table 4.1.1 of this
appendix.
3.8.4 Clothes washers that have options
such as multiple selections of spin speeds or
spin times that result in different RMC values
and that are available in the energy test cycle,
shall be tested at the maximum and
minimum extremes of the available options,
excluding any ‘‘no spin’’ (zero spin speed)
settings, in accordance with requirements in
3.8.2 or 3.8.3. The calculated RMCmax,max
extraction and RMCmax,min extraction at the
maximum and minimum settings,
respectively, shall be combined as follows
and the final RMC to be used in section 4.3
shall be:
RMC = 0.75 × RMCmax,max extraction + 0.25 ×
RMCmax,min extraction
3.9 ‘‘Steam Wash’’ for clothes washers
equipped with a steam cycle. Water and
electrical energy consumption shall be
measured for each water fill level and/or test
load size as specified in 3.9.1 through 3.9.3
for the hottest wash setting available with
steam.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
3.9.1 Maximum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hsx), cold water
consumption (Csx), and electrical energy
consumption (Esx) shall be measured for a
steam energy test cycle, with the controls set
for the maximum water fill level. The
maximum test load size is to be used and
shall be determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.9.2 Minimum test load and water fill.
Hot water consumption (Hsn), cold water
consumption (Csn), and electrical energy
consumption (Esn) shall be measured for a
steam energy test cycle, with the controls set
for the minimum water fill level. The
minimum test load size is to be used and
shall be determined per Table 5.1 of this
appendix.
3.9.3 Average test load and water fill. For
clothes washers with an adaptive water fill
control system, measure the values for hot
water consumption (Hsa), cold water
consumption (Csa), and electrical energy
consumption (Esa) for a steam energy test
cycle using an average test load size as
determined per Table 5.1 of this appendix.
3.10 Self-clean. Set the controls to obtain
the self-clean cycle. Hot water consumption
(Hsc), cold water consumption (Csc), and
electric energy consumption (Esc) shall be
measured for the self-clean cycle. Do not use
a test load.
3.11 Standby mode, off mode, delay start
mode, and cycle finished mode power.
Establish the testing conditions set forth in
sections 2.2 and 2.11. For clothes washers
that drop from a higher power state to a
lower power state as discussed in section 5,
paragraph 5.1, note 1 of IEC 62301,
(incorporated by reference; see § 430.3),
allow sufficient time for the clothes washer
to reach the lower power state before
proceeding with the test measurement.
Follow the test procedure specified in section
5, paragraph 5.3 of IEC 62301 for testing in
each possible mode as described in 3.11.1
through 3.11.4. For units in which power
varies over a cycle, as described in section 5,
paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC 62301, use the average
power approach described in Paragraph
5.3.2(a) of IEC 62301.
3.11.1 If a clothes washer has a cycle
finished mode as defined in section 1.9,
measure and record its average cycle finished
mode power, Pcf, in watts, allowing the
product to stabilize for at least 30 minutes
and using a measurement period in which
the energy use is not less than 10 minutes.
3.11.2 If a clothes washer has a delay start
mode as defined in section 1.11, measure and
record its average delay start mode power,
Pds, in watts by setting it to a delay start time
of 5 hours, allowing at least 5 minutes for the
power input to stabilize. Then measure and
record the average delay start mode power of
the clothes washer, Pds, in watts, for the
following 60 minutes.
3.11.3 If a clothes washer has an inactive
mode as defined in section 1.14, measure and
record the average inactive mode power of
the clothes washer, Pia, in watts, allowing the
product to stabilize for at least 30 minutes
and using a measurement period of not less
than 10 minutes.
3.11.4 If a clothes washer has an off mode
as defined in section 1.22, measure and
record its average off mode power, Po, in
watts, allowing the product to stabilize for at
least 30 minutes and using a measurement
period of not less than 10 minutes.
4. Calculation of Derived Results From Test
Measurements
4.1 Hot water and machine electrical
energy consumption of clothes washers.
4.1.1 Per-cycle temperature-weighted hot
water consumption for maximum, average,
and minimum water fill levels using each
appropriate load size as defined in section
2.8 and Table 5.1 of this appendix. Calculate
for the cycle under test the per-cycle
temperature weighted hot water consumption
for the maximum water fill level, Vhx, the
average water fill level, Vha, and the
minimum water fill level, Vhn, expressed in
gallons per cycle (or liters per cycle) and
defined as:
(a) Vhx = [Hsx × TUFs] + [Hmx × TUFm] + [Hhx
× TUFh] + [Hwx × TUFw] + [Hwwx ×
TUFww] + [Hcx × TUFc]
(b) Vha = [Hsa × TUFs] + [Hma × TUFm] + [Hha
× TUFh] + [Hwa × TUFw] + [Hwwa ×
TUFww] + [Hca × TUFc]
(c) Vhn = [Hsn × TUFs] + [Hmn × TUFm] + [Hhn
× TUFh] + [Hwn × TUFw] + [Hwwn ×
TUFww] + [Hcn × TUFc]
57591
Where:
Hsx, Hsa, and Hsn, are reported hot water
consumption values, in gallons per cycle
(or liters per cycle), at maximum,
average, and minimum water fill,
respectively, for the steam cycle with the
appropriate test loads as defined in
section 2.8.
Hmx, Hma, and Hmn, are reported hot water
consumption values, in gallons per-cycle
(or liters per cycle), at maximum,
average, and minimum water fill,
respectively, for the extra hot wash cycle
with the appropriate test loads as
defined in section 2.8.
Hhx, Hha, and Hhn, are reported hot water
consumption values, in gallons per-cycle
(or liters per cycle), at maximum,
average, and minimum water fill,
respectively, for the hot wash cycle with
the appropriate test loads as defined in
section 2.8.
Hwx, Hwa, and Hwn, are reported hot water
consumption values, in gallons per-cycle
(or liters per cycle), at maximum,
average, and minimum water fill,
respectively, for the warm wash cycle
with the appropriate test loads as
defined in section 2.8.
Hwwx, Hwwa, and Hwwn, are reported hot
water consumption values, in gallons
per-cycle (or liters per cycle), at
maximum, average, and minimum water
fill, respectively, for the warm wash/
warm rinse cycle with the appropriate
test loads as defined in section 2.8.
Hcx, Hca, and Hcn, are reported hot water
consumption values, in gallons per-cycle
(or liters per cycle), at maximum,
average, and minimum water fill,
respectively, for the cold wash cycle
with the appropriate test loads as
defined in section 2.8.
TUFs, TUFm, TUFh, TUFw, TUFww, and TUFc
are temperature use factors for steam
wash, extra hot wash, hot wash, warm
wash, warm wash/warm rinse, and cold
wash temperature selections,
respectively, and are as defined in Table
4.1.1 of this appendix.
TABLE 4.1.1—TEMPERATURE USE FACTORS
Max Wash Temp Available ....................................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
No. Wash Temp Selections ...................................
TUFs (steam) ..........................................................
TUFm (extra hot) ....................................................
TUFh (hot) ..............................................................
TUFww (warm/warm) ..............................................
TUFw (warm) ..........................................................
TUFc (cold) .............................................................
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
Single
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.00
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
2 Temps
NA
NA
0.63
NA
NA
0.37
≤135 °F
(57.2 °C)
>2 Temps
NA
NA
0.14
0.27*
0.22
0.37
>135 °F
(57.2 °C)
3 Temps
NA
0.14
NA
0.27*
0.22
0.37
>135 °F
(57.2 °C)
>3 Temps
NA
0.05
0.09
0.27*
0.22
0.37
Steam
Steam
3 Temps
0.02
0.12
NA
0.27*
0.22
0.37
>3 Temps
0.02
0.03
0.09
0.27*
0.22
0.37
* Only applicable to machines offering a warm/warm cycle. For machines with no warm/warm cycle, this value should be zero and TUF
w
(warm) should be 0.49.
4.1.2 Total per-cycle hot water energy
consumption for all maximum, average, and
minimum water fill levels tested. Calculate
the total per-cycle hot water energy
consumption for the maximum water fill
level, HEmax, the minimum water fill level,
HEmin, and the average water fill level, HEavg,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and
defined as:
(a) HEmax = [Vhx × T × K] = Total energy when
a maximum load is tested.
(b) HEavg = [Vha × T × K] = Total energy when
an average load is tested.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) HEmin = [Vhn × T × K] = Total energy when
a minimum load is tested.
Where:
T = Temperature rise = 75 °F (41.7 °C).
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57592
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
K = Water specific heat in kilowatt-hours per
gallon degree F = 0.00240 (0.00114 kWh/
L¥°C).
Vhx, Vha, and Vhn are as defined in 4.1.1.
4.1.3 Total weighted per-cycle hot water
energy consumption. Calculate the total
weighted per-cycle hot water energy
consumption, HET, expressed in kilowatthours per cycle and defined as:
HET = [HEmax × Fmax] + [HEavg × Favg] + [HEmin
× Fmin]
Where:
HEmax, HEavg, and HEmin are as defined in
4.1.2.
Fmax, Favg, and Fmin are the load usage factors
for the maximum, average, and
minimum test loads based on the size
and type of the control system on the
washer being tested. The values are as
shown in Table 4.1.3 of this appendix.
TABLE 4.1.3—LOAD USAGE FACTORS
Water fill control
system
Manual
Fmax = .......................
Favg = ........................
Fmin = ........................
10.72
................
10.28
1 Reference
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
2 Reference
Adaptive
20.12
20.74
20.14
3.2.3.3.
3.2.3.2.
4.1.4 Total per-cycle hot water energy
consumption using gas-heated or oil-heated
water. Calculate for the energy test cycle the
per-cycle hot water consumption, HETG,
using gas-heated or oil-heated water,
expressed in Btu per cycle (or megajoules per
cycle) and defined as:
HETG = HET × 1/e × 3412 Btu/kWh or HETG
= HET × 1/e × 3.6 MJ/kWh
Where:
e = Nominal gas or oil water heater efficiency
= 0.75.
HET = As defined in 4.1.3.
4.1.5 Per-cycle machine electrical energy
consumption for all maximum, average, and
minimum test load sizes. Calculate the total
per-cycle machine electrical energy
consumption for the maximum water fill
level, MEmax, the average water fill level,
MEavg, and the minimum water fill level,
MEmin, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle
and defined as:
(a)
MEmax = [Esx × TUFs] + [Emx × TUFm] + [Ehx
× TUFh] + [Ewx × TUFw] + [Ewwx ×
TUFww] + [Ecx × TUFc]
(b)
MEavg = [Esa × TUFs] + [Ema × TUFm] + [Eha
× TUFh] + [Ewa × TUFw] + [Ewwa ×
TUFww] + [Eca × TUFc]
(c)
MEmin = [Esn × TUFs] + [Emn × TUFm] + [Ehn
× TUFh] + [Ewn × TUFw] + [Ewwn ×
TUFww] + [Ecn × TUFc]
Where:
Esx, Esa, and Esn, are reported electrical
energy consumption values, in kilowatthours per cycle, at maximum, average,
and minimum test loads, respectively,
for the steam cycle.
Emx, Ema, and Emn, are reported electrical
energy consumption values, in kilowatt-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
hours per cycle, at maximum, average,
and minimum test loads, respectively,
for the extra hot wash cycle.
Ehx, Eha, and Ehn, are reported electrical
energy consumption values, in kilowatthours per cycle, at maximum, average,
and minimum test loads, respectively,
for the hot wash cycle.
Ewx, Ewa, and Ewn, are reported electrical
energy consumption values, in kilowatthours per cycle, at maximum, average,
and minimum test loads, respectively,
for the warm wash cycle.
Ewwx, Ewwa, and Ewwn, are reported
electrical energy consumption values, in
kilowatt-hours per cycle, at maximum,
average, and minimum test loads,
respectively, for the warm wash/warm
rinse cycle.
Ecx, Eca, and Ecn, are reported electrical
energy consumption values, in kilowatthours per cycle, at maximum, average,
and minimum test loads, respectively,
for the cold wash cycle.
TUFs, TUFm, TUFh, TUFw, TUFww, and TUFc
are as defined in Table 4.1.1 of this
appendix.
4.1.6 Total weighted per-cycle machine
electrical energy consumption. Calculate the
total per-cycle load size weighted energy
consumption, MET, expressed in kilowatthours per cycle and defined as:
MET = [MEmax × Fmax] + [MEavg × Favg] +
[MEmin × Fmin]
Where:
MEmax, MEavg, and MEmin are as defined in
4.1.5.
Fmax, Favg, and Fmin are as defined in Table
4.1.3 of this appendix.
4.1.7 Total per-cycle energy consumption
when electrically heated water is used.
Calculate for the energy test cycle the total
per-cycle energy consumption, ETE, using
electrically heated water, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
ETE = HET + MET
Where:
MET = As defined in 4.1.6.
HET = As defined in 4.1.3.
4.1.8 Per-cycle self-clean hot water energy
consumption. Calculate the per-cycle selfclean hot water energy consumption, HEsc,
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle, and
defined as:
HEsc = [Hsc × T × K]
Where:
Hsc = reported hot water consumption value,
in gallons per-cycle, for the self-clean
cycle as defined in section 3.10.
T = Temperature rise = 75 °F (41.7 °C).
K = Water specific heat in kilowatt-hours per
gallon degree F = 0.00240 (0.00114 kWh/
L¥°C).
4.2 Water consumption of clothes
washers. (The calculations in this Section
need not be performed to determine
compliance with the energy conservation
standards for clothes washers manufactured
before January 1, 2011.)
4.2.1 Per-cycle water consumption for
steam wash. Calculate the maximum,
average, and minimum total water
consumption, expressed in gallons per cycle
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(or liters per cycle), for the steam cycle and
defined as:
Qsmax = [Hsx + Csx]
Qsavg = [Hsa + Csa]
Qsmin = [Hsn + Csn]
Where:
Hsx, Csx, Hsa, Csa, Hsn, and Csn are defined
in 3.9.
4.2.2 Per-cycle water consumption for
extra hot wash. Calculate the maximum,
average, and minimum total water
consumption, expressed in gallons per cycle
(or liters per cycle), for the extra hot wash
cycle and defined as:
Qmmax = [Hmx + Cmx]
Qmavg = [Hma + Cma]
Qmmin = [Hmn + Cmn]
Where:
Hmx, Cmx, Hma, Cma, Hmn, and Cmn are
defined in 3.3.
4.2.3 Per-cycle water consumption for hot
wash. Calculate the maximum, average, and
minimum total water consumption,
expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters per
cycle), for the hot wash cycle and defined as:
Qhmax = [Hhx + Chx]
Qhavg = [Hha + Cha]
Qhmin = [Hhn + Chn]
Where:
Hhx, Chx, Hha, Cha, Hhn, and Chn are defined
in 3.4.
4.2.4 Per-cycle water consumption for
warm wash with cold rinse. Calculate the
maximum, average, and minimum total water
consumption, expressed in gallons per cycle
(or liters per cycle), for the warm wash cold
rinse cycle and defined as:
Qwmax = [Hwx + Cwx]
Qwavg = [Hwa + Cwa]
Qwmin = [Hwn + Cwn]
Where:
Hwx, Cwx, Hwa, Cwa, Hwn, and Cwn are
defined in 3.5.
4.2.5 Per-cycle water consumption for
warm wash with warm rinse. Calculate the
maximum, average, and minimum total water
consumption, expressed in gallons per cycle
(or liters per cycle), for the warm wash/warm
rinse cycle and defined as:
Qwwmax = [Hwwx + Cwwx]
Qwwavg = [Hwwa + Cwwa]
Qwwmin = [Hwwn + Cwwn]
Where:
Hwwx, Cwwx, Hwwa, Cwwa, Hwwn, and
Cwwn are defined in 3.7.
4.2.6 Per-cycle water consumption for
cold wash. Calculate the maximum, average,
and minimum total water consumption,
expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters per
cycle), for the cold wash cycle and defined
as:
Qcmax = [Hcx + Ccx]
Qcavg = [Hca + Cca]
Qcmin = [Hcn + Ccn]
Where:
Hcx, Ccx, Hca, Cca, Hcn, and Ccn are defined
in 3.6.
4.2.7 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for steam wash. Calculate the
total weighted per cycle consumption, QsT,
expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters per
cycle) and defined as:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57593
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
QsT = [Qsmax × Fmax] + [Qsavg × Favg] + [Qsmin
× Fmin]
Where:
Qsmax, Qsavg, Qsmin are defined in 4.2.1.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.8 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for extra hot wash. Calculate
the total weighted per cycle consumption,
QmT, expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters
per cycle) and defined as:
QmT = [Qmmax × Fmax] + [Qmavg × Favg] +
[Qmmin × Fmin]
Where:
Qmmax, Qmavg, Qmmin are defined in 4.2.2.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.9 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for hot wash. Calculate the total
weighted per cycle consumption, QhT,
expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters per
cycle) and defined as:
QhT = [Qhmax × Fmax] + [Qhavg × Favg] + [Qhmin
× Fmin]
Where:
Qhmax, Qhavg, Qhmin are defined in 4.2.3.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.10 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for warm wash with cold
rinse. Calculate the total weighted per
cycle consumption, QwT, expressed in
gallons per cycle (or liters per cycle) and
defined as:
QwT = [Qwmax × Fmax] + [Qwavg × Favg] +
[Qwmin × Fmin]
Where:
Qwmax, Qwavg, Qwmin are defined in 4.2.4.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.11 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for warm wash with warm
rinse. Calculate the total weighted per cycle
consumption, QwT, expressed in gallons per
cycle (or liters per cycle) and defined as:
QwwT = [Qwwmax × Fmax] + [Qwwavg × Favg]
+ [Qwwmin × Fmin]
Where:
Qwwmax, Qwwavg, Qwwmin are defined in
4.2.5.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.12 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for cold wash. Calculate the
total weighted per cycle consumption, QcT,
expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters per
cycle) and defined as:
QcT = [Qcmax × Fmax] + [Qcavg × Favg] + [Qcmin
× Fmin]
Where:
Qcmax, Qcavg, Qcmin are defined in 4.2.6.
Fmax, Favg, Fmin are defined in Table 4.1.3 of
this appendix.
4.2.13 Total weighted per-cycle water
consumption for all wash cycles. Calculate
the total weighted per cycle consumption,
QT, expressed in gallons per cycle (or liters
per cycle) and defined as:
QT = [QsT × TUFs] + [QmT × TUFm] + [QhT
× TUFh] + [QwT × TUFw] + [QwwT ×
TUFww] + [QcT × TUFc]
Where:
QsT, QmT, QhT, QwT, QwwT, and QcT are
defined in 4.2.7 through 4.2.12.
TUFs, TUFm, TUFh, TUFw, TUFww, and TUFc
are defined in Table 4.1.1 of this
appendix.
4.2.14 Per-cycle self-clean water
consumption. Calculate the total per-cycle
self-clean water consumption, Qsc, in gallons
per cycle (or liters per cycle) and defined as:
Qsc = [Hsc + Csc]
Where:
Hsc = As defined in 3.10.
Csc = As defined in 3.10.
4.2.15 Water consumption factor.
Calculate the water consumption factor,
WCF, expressed in gallons per cycle per
cubic feet (or liter per cycle per liter), as:
WCF = QcT/C
Where:
QcT = As defined in 4.2.12.
C = As defined in 3.1.5.
4.2.16 Integrated water consumption
factor. Calculate the integrated water
consumption factor, IWF, expressed in
gallons per cycle per cubic feet (or liter per
cycle per liter), as:
IWF = [QT + Qsc]/C
Where:
QT = As defined in 4.2.13.
Qsc = As defined in 4.2.14.
C = As defined in 3.1.5.
4.3 Per-cycle energy consumption for
removal of moisture from test load. Calculate
the per-cycle energy required to remove the
moisture of the test load, DE, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
DE = (LAF) × (Maximum test load weight) ×
(RMC–4%) × (DEF) × (DUF)
Where:
LAF = Load adjustment factor = 0.52.
Test load weight=As required in 3.8.1,
expressed in lbs/cycle.
RMC = As defined in 3.8.2.5, 3.8.3.3, or 3.8.4.
DEF = Nominal energy required for a clothes
dryer to remove moisture from clothes =
0.5 kWh/lb (1.1 kWh/kg).
DUF = Dryer usage factor, percentage of
washer loads dried in a clothes dryer =
0.91.
4.4 Per-cycle standby mode, off mode,
delay start mode, and cycle finished mode
energy consumption. Calculate the clothes
washer combined standby mode, off mode,
delay start mode, and cycle finished energy
consumption per cycle, ETSO, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
ETSO = [(Pcf × Scf) + (Pds × Sds) + (Pia × Sia)
+ (Po × So)] × Kp/295
Where:
Pcf = Washer cycle finished mode power, in
watts, as defined in 3.11.1 for clothes
washers capable of operating in cycle
finished mode; otherwise, Pcf = 0.
Pds = Washer delay start mode power, in
watts, as defined in 3.11.2 for clothes
washers capable of operating in delay
start mode; otherwise, Pds = 0.
Pia = Washer inactive mode power, in watts,
as defined in 3.11.3 for clothes washers
capable of operating in inactive mode;
otherwise, Pia = 0.
Po = Washer off mode power, in watts, as
defined in 3.11.4 for clothes washers
capable of operating in off mode;
otherwise, Po = 0.
Scf = 15 annual hours in cycle finished mode
for clothes washers capable of operating
in inactive mode; otherwise, Scf = 0.
Sds = 25 annual hours in delay start mode for
clothes washers capable of operating in
inactive mode; otherwise, Sds = 0.
Sia = Annual hours in inactive mode as
defined as Soi if no off mode is possible,
[Soi/2] if both inactive mode and off
mode are possible, and 0 if no inactive
mode is possible, where Soi is the
combined annual hours for off and
inactive mode as defined in Table 4.4.1
of this appendix.
So = Annual hours in off mode as defined as
Soi if no inactive mode is possible,
[Soi/2] if both inactive mode and off
mode are possible, and 0 if no off mode
is possible, where Soi is the combined
annual hours for off and inactive mode
as defined in Table 4.4.1 of this
appendix.
Kp = Conversion factor of watt-hours to
kilowatt-hours = 0.001.
295 = Representative average number of
clothes washer cycles in a year.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
TABLE 4.4.1—ANNUAL OFF AND INACTIVE MODE HOURS
All modes
possible
No delay
start
mode
No cycle
finished
mode
No delay
start or
cycle
finished
modes
8,425
8,450
8,440
8,465
No Self-Clean Cycle:
Soi ....................................................................................................................................................
Self-Clean Cycle Possible:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
57594
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 4.4.1—ANNUAL OFF AND INACTIVE MODE HOURS—Continued
All modes
possible
No delay
start
mode
No cycle
finished
mode
No delay
start or
cycle
finished
modes
8,409
8,434
8,424
8,449
Soi .............................................................................................................................................
4.5 Per-cycle self-clean energy
consumption. Calculate the clothes washer
self-clean energy per cycle, ETSC, expressed
in kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
ETSC = [HEsc + Esc] × 12/295
Where:
HEsc = As defined in 4.1.8.
Esc = Reported electrical energy consumption
value, in kilowatt hours per cycle, for the
self-clean cycle as defined in 3.10.
12 = Representative average number of
clothes washer self-clean cycles in a
year.
295 = Representative average number of
clothes washer cycles in a year.
4.6 Modified energy factor. Calculate the
modified energy factor, MEF, expressed in
cubic feet per kilowatt-hour per cycle (or
liters per kilowatt-hour per cycle) and
defined as:
MEF = C/(ETE + DE)
Where:
C = As defined in 3.1.5.
ETE = As defined in 4.1.7.
DE = As defined in 4.3.
4.7 Integrated modified energy factor.
Calculate the integrated modified energy
factor, IMEF, expressed in cubic feet per
kilowatt-hour per cycle (or liters per
kilowatt-hour per cycle) and defined as:
IMEF = C/(ETE + DE + ETSO + ETSC)
Where:
C = As defined in 3.1.5.
ETE = As defined in 4.1.7.
DE = As defined in 4.3.
ETSO = As defined in 4.4.
ETSC = As defined in 4.5.
5. Test Loads
TABLE 5.1—TEST LOAD SIZES
Container volume
cu. ft.
Average load
<
lb
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Maximum load
liter
<
Minimum load
0–0.8
0.80–0.90
0.90–1.00
1.00–1.10
1.10–1.20
1.20–1.30
1.30–1.40
1.40–1.50
1.50–1.60
1.60–1.70
1.70–1.80
1.80–1.90
1.90–2.00
2.00–2.10
2.10–2.20
2.20–2.30
2.30–2.40
2.40–2.50
2.50–2.60
2.60–2.70
2.70–2.80
2.80–2.90
2.90–3.00
3.00–3.10
3.10–3.20
3.20–3.30
3.30–3.40
3.40–3.50
3.50–3.60
3.60–3.70
3.70–3.80
3.80–3.90
3.90–4.00
4.00–4.10
4.10–4.20
4.20–4.30
4.30–4.40
4.40–4.50
4.50–4.60
4.60–4.70
4.70–4.80
4.80–4.90
4.90–5.00
VerDate Mar<15>2010
0–22.7
22.7–25.5
25.5–28.3
28.3–31.1
31.1–34.0
34.0–36.8
36.8–39.6
39.6–42.5
42.5–45.3
45.3–48.1
48.1–51.0
51.0–53.8
53.8–56.6
56.6–59.5
59.5–62.3
62.3–65.1
65.1–68.0
68.0–70.8
70.8–73.6
73.6–76.5
76.5–79.3
79.3–82.1
82.1–85.0
85.0–87.8
87.8–90.6
90.6–93.4
93.4–96.3
96.3–99.1
99.1–101.9
101.9–104.8
104.8–107.6
107.6–110.4
110.4–113.3
113.3–116.1
116.1–118.9
118.9–121.8
121.8–124.6
124.6–127.4
127.4–130.3
130.3–133.1
133.1–135.9
135.9–138.8
138.8–141.6
20:25 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
kg
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
PO 00000
lb
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
kg
3.00
3.50
3.90
4.30
4.70
5.10
5.50
5.90
6.40
6.80
7.20
7.60
8.00
8.40
8.80
9.20
9.60
10.00
10.50
10.90
11.30
11.70
12.10
12.50
12.90
13.30
13.70
14.10
14.60
15.00
15.40
15.80
16.20
16.60
17.00
17.40
17.80
18.20
18.70
19.10
19.50
19.90
20.30
Sfmt 4700
lb
1.36
1.59
1.77
1.95
2.13
2.31
2.49
2.68
2.9
3.08
3.27
3.45
3.63
3.81
3.99
4.17
4.35
4.54
4.76
4.94
5.13
5.31
5.49
5.67
5.85
6.03
6.21
6.4
6.62
6.8
6.99
7.16
7.34
7.53
7.72
7.90
8.09
8.27
8.46
8.65
8.83
9.02
9.20
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
kg
3
3.25
3.45
3.65
3.85
4.05
4.25
4.45
4.7
4.9
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.7
5.9
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.75
6.95
7.15
7.35
7.55
7.75
7.95
8.15
8.35
8.55
8.8
9
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.8
10.0
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.8
11.0
11.2
11.4
11.6
1.36
1.47
1.56
1.66
1.75
1.84
1.93
2.02
2.13
2.22
2.31
2.4
2.49
2.59
2.68
2.77
2.86
2.95
3.06
3.15
3.24
3.33
3.42
3.52
3.61
3.7
3.79
3.88
3.99
4.08
4.17
4.26
4.35
4.45
4.54
4.63
4.72
4.82
4.91
5.00
5.10
5.19
5.28
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
57595
TABLE 5.1—TEST LOAD SIZES—Continued
Container volume
cu. ft.
Maximum load
Average load
liter
<
Minimum load
<
lb
5.00–5.10
5.10–5.20
5.20–5.30
5.30–5.40
5.40–5.50
5.50–5.60
5.60–5.70
5.70–5.80
5.80–5.90
5.90–6.00
141.6–144.4
144.4–147.2
147.2–150.1
150.1–152.9
152.9–155.7
155.7–158.6
158.6–161.4
161.4–164.2
164.2–167.1
167.1–169.9
kg
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
lb
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.36
kg
20.70
21.10
21.50
21.90
22.30
22.80
23.20
23.60
24.00
24.40
lb
9.39
9.58
9.76
9.95
10.13
10.32
10.51
10.69
10.88
11.06
kg
11.9
12.1
12.3
12.5
12.7
12.9
13.1
13.3
13.5
13.7
5.38
5.47
5.56
5.65
5.75
5.84
5.93
6.03
6.12
6.21
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Notes: (1) All test load weights are bone dry weights.
(2) Allowable tolerance on the test load weights are ±0.10 lbs (0.05 kg).
6. Waivers and Field Testing
6.1 Waivers and Field Testing for Nonconventional Clothes Washers.
Manufacturers of nonconventional clothes
washers, such as clothes washers with
adaptive control systems, must submit a
petition for waiver pursuant to 10 CFR
430.27 to establish an acceptable test
procedure for that clothes washer. For these
and other clothes washers that have controls
or systems such that the DOE test procedures
yield results that are so unrepresentative of
the clothes washer’s true energy
consumption characteristics as to provide
materially inaccurate comparative data, field
testing may be appropriate for establishing an
acceptable test procedure. The following are
guidelines for field testing which may be
used by manufacturers in support of petitions
for waiver. These guidelines are not
mandatory and the Department may
determine that they do not apply to a
particular model. Depending upon a
manufacturer’s approach for conducting field
testing, additional data may be required.
Manufacturers are encouraged to
communicate with the Department prior to
the commencement of field tests which may
be used to support a petition for waiver.
Section 6.3 provides an example of field
testing for a clothes washer with an adaptive
water fill control system. Other features, such
as the use of various spin speed selections,
could be the subject of field tests.
6.2 Nonconventional Wash System
Energy Consumption Test. The field test may
consist of a minimum of 10 of the
nonconventional clothes washers (‘‘test
clothes washers’’) and 10 clothes washers
already being distributed in commerce (‘‘base
clothes washers’’). The tests should include a
minimum of 50 energy test cycles per clothes
washer. The test clothes washers and base
clothes washers should be identical in
construction except for the controls or
systems being tested. Equal numbers of both
the test clothes washer and the base clothes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:12 Sep 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
washer should be tested simultaneously in
comparable settings to minimize seasonal or
consumer laundering conditions or
variations. The clothes washers should be
monitored in such a way as to accurately
record the total energy consumption per
cycle. At a minimum, the following should
be measured and recorded throughout the
test period for each clothes washer: Hot water
usage in gallons (or liters), electrical energy
usage in kilowatt-hours, and the cycles of
usage.
The field test results would be used to
determine the best method to correlate the
rating of the test clothes washer to the rating
of the base clothes washer. If the base clothes
washer is rated at A kWh per year, but field
tests at B kWh per year, and the test clothes
washer field tests at D kWh per year, the test
unit would be rated as follows:
A × (D/B) = G kWh per year
6.3 Adaptive water fill control system
field test. Section 3.2.3.1 defines the test
method for measuring energy consumption
for clothes washers which incorporate
control systems having both adaptive and
alternate cycle selections. Energy
consumption calculated by the method
defined in section 3.2.3.1 assumes the
adaptive cycle will be used 50 percent of the
time. This section can be used to develop
field test data in support of a petition for
waiver when it is believed that the adaptive
cycle will be used more than 50 percent of
the time. The field test sample size should be
a minimum of 10 test clothes washers. The
test clothes washers should be totally
representative of the design, construction,
and control system that will be placed in
commerce. The duration of field testing in
the user’s house should be a minimum of 50
energy test cycles, for each unit. No special
instructions as to cycle selection or product
usage should be given to the field test
participants, other than inclusion of the
product literature pack which would be
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
shipped with all units, and instructions
regarding filling out data collection forms,
use of data collection equipment, or basic
procedural methods. Prior to the test clothes
washers being installed in the field test
locations, baseline data should be developed
for all field test units by conducting
laboratory tests as defined by section 1
through section 5 of these test procedures to
determine the energy consumption, water
consumption, and remaining moisture
content values. The following data should be
measured and recorded for each wash load
during the test period: wash cycle selected,
the mode of the clothes washer (adaptive or
manual), clothes load dry weight (measured
after the clothes washer and clothes dryer
cycles are completed) in pounds, and type of
articles in the clothes load (e.g., cottons,
linens, permanent press). The wash loads
used in calculating the in-home percentage
split between adaptive and manual cycle
usage should be only those wash loads which
conform to the definition of the energy test
cycle.
Calculate:
T = The total number of energy test cycles
run during the field test.
Ta = The total number of adaptive control
energy test cycles.
Tm = The total number of manual control
energy test cycles.
The percentage weighting factors:
Pa = (Ta/T) × 100 (the percentage weighting
for adaptive control selection)
Pm = (Tm/T) × 100 (the percentage weighting
for manualcontrol selection)
Energy consumption (HET, MET, and DE)
and water consumption (QT), values
calculated in section 4 for the manual and
adaptive modes, should be combined using
Pa and Pm as the weighting factors.
[FR Doc. 2010–22225 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\21SEP2.SGM
21SEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57556-57595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22225]
[[Page 57555]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Energy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 CFR Part 430
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure for
Residential Clothes Washers; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 57556]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-TP-0021]
RIN 1904-AC08
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure
for Residential Clothes Washers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) and public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes amending its test
procedure for residential clothes washers under the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act to provide for measuring standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, and to update the active mode test procedure. DOE
is also proposing to eliminate an obsolete clothes washer test
procedure currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, and is
announcing a public meeting to discuss and receive comments on the
issues presented in this NOPR.
DATES: DOE will hold a public meeting on Thursday, October 28, 2010,
from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., in Washington, DC. DOE must receive requests to
speak at the public meeting before 4 p.m., Thursday, October 14, 2010.
DOE must receive a signed original and an electronic copy of statements
to be given at the public meeting before 4 p.m., Thursday, October 21,
2010.
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding the NOPR
before and after the public meeting, but no later than December 6,
2010. For details, see section V, ``Public Participation,'' of this
NOPR.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. To attend the public meeting, please notify
Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945. Please note that foreign
nationals visiting DOE Headquarters are subject to advance security
screening procedures. Any foreign national wishing to participate in
the meeting should advise DOE as soon as possible by contacting Ms.
Edwards to initiate the necessary procedures.
Any comments submitted must identify the NOPR on Test Procedures
for Residential Clothes Washers, and provide the docket number EERE-
2010-BT-TP-0021 and/or regulatory information number (RIN) 1904-AC08.
Comments may be submitted using any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail: RES-CW-2010-TP-0021@ee.doe.gov. Include docket number
EERE-2010-BT-TP-0021 and/or RIN 1904-AC08 in the subject line of the
message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Please submit one signed original paper
copy.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, 6th Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza,
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. Please submit one
signed original paper copy.
For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see Section V, ``Public
Participation,'' of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, visit the U.S. Department of Energy, Resource Room
of the Building Technologies Program, 6th Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza,
SW., Washington, DC 20024, (202) 586-2945, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number for additional information about
visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Stephen L. Witkowski, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE-2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 586-7463. E-mail: mailto:Stephen.Witkowski@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Jennifer Tiedeman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 287-6111. E-mail:
mailto:Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or review public comments and on how
to participate in the public meeting, contact Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Program, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. E-mail:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Legal Authority
II. Summary of the Proposal
III. Discussion
A. Products Covered by This Test Procedure Change
B. Compliance Date of Proposed Test Procedure
C. Standby Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active Mode Test
Procedures
1. Incorporating by Reference IEC Standard 62301 for Measuring
Standby Mode and Off Mode Power Consumption
2. Determination of Modes To Be Incorporated
3. Adding Specifications for the Test Methods and Measurements
for Standby Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active Mode Testing
4. Calculation of Energy Use Associated With Each Operating Mode
5. Measures of Energy Consumption
D. Clothes Washer Active Mode Test Procedure
1. Technologies Not Covered by the Current Clothes Washer Test
Procedure
a. Steam Wash Cycles
b. Self-Clean Cycles
c. Adaptive Control Technologies
d. Demand Response Technology
2. Changes to Reflect Current Usage Patterns and Capabilities
a. Representative Annual Cycles
b. Test Load Size Specifications
c. Use Factors
3. Test Cloth
4. Other Revisions and Clarifications
a. Clothes Washer Capacity Measurement Method
b. New Measure of Water Consumption
c. Energy Test Cycle
d. Detergent Specifications for Test Cloth Preconditioning
e. Clothes Washer for Test Cloth Preconditioning
f. Water Supply Pressure
g. Additional Revisions and Clarifications
5. Test Procedure Performance Specifications
E. Compliance With Other EPCA Requirements
1. Test Burden
2. Integration of Standby Mode and Off Mode Energy Consumption
Into the Efficiency Metrics
3. Commercial Clothes Washers
F. Impact of the Proposed Amendments on EnergyGuide and ENERGY
STAR
G. Elimination of the Obsolete Clothes Washer Test Procedure
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
[[Page 57557]]
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
(FEA) Act of 1974
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests to Speak
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
1. Incorporation of IEC Standard 62301
2. Clothes Washer Modes
3. Default Settings
4. Delay Start Mode
5. Test Room Ambient Temperature
6. Energy Use Calculation
7. New Integrated Measures of Energy Consumption and Energy
Efficiency
8. Annual Energy Cost Calculation
9. Steam Wash Cycles
10. Self-Clean Cycles
11. Adaptive Control and Demand Response Technologies
12. Representative Number of Annual Cycles
13. Test Load Size Specifications
14. Use Factors
15. Test Cloth
16. Capacity Measurement Method
17. New Integrated Measure of Water Consumption
18. Energy Test Cycle Definition
19. Detergent Specifications
20. Clothes Washer for Preconditioning
21. Water Supply Pressure
22. Impact on Commercial Clothes Washers
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Background and Legal Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291
et seq.) (EPCA or the Act) sets forth a variety of provisions designed
to improve energy efficiency. Part A of Title III (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309)
establishes the ``Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products
Other Than Automobiles,'' which covers consumer products and certain
commercial products (all of which are referred to below as ``covered
products''). These include residential clothes washers, the subject of
today's notice. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(7))
Under the Act, this program consists essentially of three parts:
(1) Testing, (2) labeling, and (3) Federal energy conservation
standards. The testing requirements consist of test procedures that,
pursuant to EPCA, manufacturers of covered products must use as the
basis for certifying to DOE that their products comply with the
applicable energy conservation standards adopted under EPCA and for
representations about the efficiency of those products. DOE also must
use these test requirements to determine whether the products comply
with EPCA standards. Section 323 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6293) sets forth
criteria and procedures for DOE's adoption and amendment of such test
procedures. EPCA provides that ``[a]ny test procedures prescribed or
amended under this section shall be reasonably designed to produce test
results which measure energy efficiency, energy use * * * or estimated
annual operating cost of a covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use, as determined by the Secretary [of
Energy], and shall not be unduly burdensome to conduct.'' (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3)) In addition, if DOE determines that a test procedure
amendment is warranted, it must publish proposed test procedures and
offer the public an opportunity to present oral and written comments on
them. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2))
Finally, in any rulemaking to amend a test procedure, DOE must
determine ``to what extent, if any, the proposed test procedure would
alter the measured energy efficiency * * * of any covered product as
determined under the existing test procedure.'' (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(1))
If DOE determines that the amended test procedure would alter the
measured efficiency of a covered product, DOE must amend the applicable
energy conservation standard accordingly. In determining the amended
energy conservation standard, the Secretary shall measure, pursuant to
the amended test procedure, the energy efficiency, energy use, or water
use of a representative sample of covered products that minimally
comply with the existing standard. The average of such energy
efficiency, energy use, or water use levels determined under the
amended test procedure shall constitute the amended energy conservation
standard for the applicable covered products. (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(2))
EPCA also states that ``models of covered products in use before the
date on which the amended energy conservation standard becomes
effective (or revisions of such models that come into use after such
date and have the same energy efficiency, energy use, or water use
characteristics) that comply with the energy conservation standard
applicable to such covered products on the day before such date shall
be deemed to comply with the amended energy conservation standard.''
(42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(2))
The DOE test procedure for clothes washers currently being
manufactured is found at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix J1. DOE
adopted appendix J1 in 1997 to correct for changes in consumer habits
that resulted in an overstatement of average annual energy consumption
when using the methods specified in appendix J. 62 FR 45508 (Aug. 27,
1997). DOE added appendix J1, rather than amending appendix J, to
accommodate continued use of appendix J until DOE amended the
residential clothes washer conservation standards to reference the new
appendix J1. On January 12, 2001, DOE published a final rule
(hereinafter referred to as the January 2001 final rule), to amend the
energy conservation standards for residential clothes washers to
reference the efficiency metrics as defined in appendix J1. 66 FR 3314.
Use of the amended J1 test procedure was required to demonstrate
compliance with these amended energy conservation standards as of
January 1, 2004. Since 1997, DOE has amended the test procedure in
appendix J1 three times, twice substantively to address test cloth
correlation procedures, and once to correct the introductory note. 63
FR 16669 (Apr. 6, 1998); 66 FR 3330 (Jan. 12, 2001); 68 FR 62204 (Oct.
31, 2003). One of these amendments also included an amendment to
Appendix J. 66 FR 3330 (Jan. 12, 2001). Because appendix J applies only
to clothes washers manufactured before January 1, 2004, however,
appendix J is now obsolete. 10 CFR 430 appendix J1.
The current applicable test procedure includes provisions for
determining the modified energy factor (MEF) for clothes washers, which
is a function of the total energy used for each cubic foot (ft\3\) of
clothes washer capacity. The test procedure measures the total energy
consumption of the clothes washer. It also accounts for the amount of
energy required to heat the water and subsequently dry the load based
on the remaining moisture content (RMC) of the clothes at the
completion of the machine's full cycle. The test procedure does not
currently address energy use in the standby or off modes.
Clothes washer energy conservation standards were originally
established by the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987,
which amended EPCA to prescribe that clothes washers manufactured on or
after January 1, 1988, have an unheated rinse option. (42 U.S.C. 6295
(g)) The amendments to EPCA also required DOE to conduct a rulemaking
by January 1, 1990, to determine if the above mentioned standards
should be amended. A final rule was issued on May 14, 1991,
(hereinafter referred to as the May 1991 final rule) establishing the
first set of performance standards for residential clothes washers.
Compliance with these standards was required for products manufactured
on or after May 14, 1994. 56 FR 22279. EPCA also
[[Page 57558]]
required DOE to conduct a subsequent rulemaking no later than 5 years
after the date of publication of the previous final rule to determine
whether to amend those standards. A final rule establishing revised
standards for residential clothes washers was published in the January
2001 final rule. 66 FR 3313. The January 2001 final rule required all
new residential clothes washers manufactured after January 1, 2007 to
be 35 percent more efficient than clothes washers minimally compliant
with the efficiency standards established in the May 1991 final rule.
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007),
Public Law 110-140, amended EPCA and, in relevant part, revised the
energy conservation standards for residential clothes washers. The
revised standards established a maximum water consumption factor (WF)
of 9.5, effective January 1, 2011. EISA 2007 further required that DOE
publish a final rule no later than December 31, 2011 determining
whether to amend the standards in effect for clothes washers
manufactured on or after January 1, 2015. (42 U.S.C. 6295(g)(9))
Consequently, DOE is conducting a separate standards rulemaking for
these products.
The EISA 2007 amendments to EPCA also direct DOE to amend its test
procedures to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy efficiency, energy consumption, or
other energy descriptor for each covered product unless the current
test procedure already fully accounts for and incorporates standby and
off mode energy consumption or such integration is technically
infeasible. If an integrated test procedure is technically infeasible,
DOE must prescribe a separate standby mode and off mode energy use test
procedure for the covered product, if technically feasible. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A))
Any such amendment must consider the most current versions of the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 62301,
``Household electrical appliances--measurement of standby power,''
First Edition 2005-06, and IEC Standard 62087, ``Methods of measurement
for the power consumption of audio, video, and related equipment,''
Second Edition, 2008-09.1 2 In developing these test
procedure amendments for clothes washers, DOE initially determined that
it would consider a revised IEC Standard 62301 expected to be released
in July 2009. DOE subsequently found that this revision is expected to
be delayed until late-2010, so DOE determined it appropriate to proceed
with an amended test procedure based on the current version of IEC
Standard 62301, First Edition 2005-06. DOE is also considering a draft
version of IEC Standard 62301, Final Draft International Standard (IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS), for updated mode definitions, which are expected
to be included in the final revised IEC Standard 62301, Second Edition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ IEC standards are available online at https://www.iec.ch.
\2\ Multiple editions of this standard are referenced in this
notice. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms ``IEC Standard 62301''
or ``IEC Standard 62301 First Edition'' refer to ``Household
electrical appliances-measurement of standby power,'' First Edition
2005-06.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 28, 2009, DOE published a notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of a framework document to initiate a
rulemaking to consider amended energy conservation standards for
residential clothes washers (hereafter the August 2009 framework
document). 74 FR 44306. In the August 2009 framework document, DOE
requested comments on the merits of revising the clothes washer test
procedure, and sought input regarding how the test procedure could be
improved. DOE held a public meeting on September 21, 2009 (September
2009 public meeting). In addition, DOE requested written comments,
data, and information on the August 2009 framework document, which it
accepted through September 28, 2009.
DOE received comments in response to the August 2009 framework
document stating that it should consider changes to the active mode
test procedure. As a result, in addition to amending its test procedure
for clothes washers to include measures for standby and off mode power
consumption, DOE proposes to address issues regarding the active mode
provisions of the test procedure.
II. Summary of the Proposal
In today's NOPR, DOE proposes amending the test procedure for
clothes washers to assist DOE in the concurrent development and
implementation of standards that address use of standby mode and off
mode power by these products. Specifically, DOE proposes to integrate
measures of standby mode and off mode power consumption, as well as
measures of power consumption in certain additional modes determined to
be part of active mode, into the test procedure. DOE also proposes, for
the measurement of energy use in active mode, to: (1) Adopt technical
changes and procedures for accurately measuring the energy consumption
of clothes washers with technologies not covered by the current
procedure; (2) more accurately reflect current consumer behavior and
clothes washer capabilities; (3) address issues related to the test
cloth, detergent, and certain test equipment; (4) revise and clarify
the existing methods and calculations; and (5) delete obsolete appendix
J to subpart B of CFR part 430 and references thereto. The following
paragraphs summarize these proposed changes.
To integrate measures of standby mode and off mode power
consumption into the test procedure, DOE proposes to incorporate by
reference into the clothes washer test procedure specific provisions
from IEC Standard 62301 regarding test conditions and test procedures
for measuring standby mode and off mode power consumption. DOE also
proposes to incorporate into the test procedure the definitions of
``active mode,'' ``standby mode,'' and ``off mode'' that are based on
the definitions provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS. Further, DOE
proposes to include in the test procedure additional language that
would clarify the application of clauses from IEC Standard 62301 for
measuring standby mode and off mode power consumption.\3\ In addition,
DOE proposes to incorporate energy consumption associated with delay
start and cycle finished modes. Although these modes would be
considered part of active mode, the measurements and calculations
proposed for them are similar to those proposed for standby and off
modes. DOE also proposes to: (1) Establish a new measure of energy use
to calculate the per-cycle standby mode, off mode, delay start mode,
and cycle finished mode energy consumption; and (2) adopt a new measure
of energy efficiency (integrated modified energy factor (IMEF)) that
includes the energy used in the active, standby, and off modes. As
indicated above, DOE energy conservation standards currently do not
address the energy use of clothes washers in the standby or off modes.
Section 325(gg)(2)(C) of EPCA provides that amendments to the test
procedures to include standby and off mode energy
[[Page 57559]]
consumption will not be used to determine compliance with previously
established standards. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2(C)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EISA 2007 directs DOE to also consider IEC Standard 62087
when amending its test procedure to include standby mode and off
mode energy consumption. See 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A). DOE
considered IEC Standard 62087 and concluded that because IEC
Standard 62087 addresses the methods of measuring the power
consumption of audio, video, and related equipment, the narrow scope
of this particular IEC Standard reduces its relevance to today's
proposal. Further details are provided later in this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the measurement of active mode energy use other than in delay
start and cycle finished modes, DOE proposes to:
(1) Update the test procedure to address technologies not covered
by the current procedure, based upon comments from interested parties
in response to the August 2009 framework document and further review by
DOE. These technologies include steam wash and self-cleaning cycles.
Steam wash cycles inject steam into the wash basket, and claim to offer
more effective cleaning. Self-clean cycles enable consumers to
intermittently, typically once per month, run a self-clean cycle to
prevent odor, bacteria, and mildew from building up in the clothes
washer. DOE proposes to amend the test procedure to measure energy use
in steam and self-clean cycles. DOE also received comments regarding
demand response technologies, and investigated adaptive controls other
than adaptive fill control. Demand response features enable an
appliance to shift its activity based on interaction with the electric
grid, utilities, or user programming. Adaptive controls enable a
clothes washer to adjust parameters such as agitation speed, number of
rinses, wash time, and wash and rinse temperatures based on the size,
fabric mix, and soil level of a wash load. However, for reasons
discussed in sections III.D.1.c and III.D.1.d, DOE is not proposing to
update the test procedure to include provisions for measuring the
energy consumption of clothes washers offering demand response
technologies or adaptive controls other than adaptive fill control.
(2) Amend the test procedure for clothes washers to reflect current
usage patterns and capabilities. DOE received multiple comments on this
issue in response to the August 2009 framework document, and reviewed
current consumer data from surveys conducted in 2004 and 2005 to
determine whether such updates are appropriate. The proposed amendments
address the following specific issues: Representative average-use
cycles per year for a clothes washer, test load size specifications,
and consumer use factors. The proposed amendments are based on recent
data that more accurately describe current consumer behavior and
updated clothes washer capabilities.
(3) Amend the test procedure to update the procedure and
specifications for determining test cloth correlations, change the
tolerances regarding the size and weight of the test cloth, and revise
the detergent and preconditioning clothes washer specifications due to
obsolescence or anticipated obsolescence of the existing test materials
and equipment specified in the test procedure. These proposed
amendments are based on multiple comments received in response to the
August 2009 framework document and at the September 2009 public meeting
regarding the test cloth used in the current test procedure.
(4) Update the test procedure to clarify or revise the existing
methods and calculations for measuring clothes container capacity,
calculating water consumption factor, determining the energy test
cycle, and setting the supply water test conditions. The current
capacity measurement provisions can be interpreted in multiple ways.
Different allowable interpretations of the maximum water fill level
used for the measurement can produce inconsistent results that may not
accurately reflect the actual usable volume of a clothes washer. The
proposed revisions revise the capacity measurement specifications so
that interpretations are more likely to be uniform, repeatable, and
representative, thereby ensuring the data is reported consistently. DOE
proposes to adopt a new measure of water consumption, integrated water
consumption factor (IWF) that would include water used in self-clean
cycles. The IWF would also include water consumption from all energy
test cycles, rather than only from the cold wash/cold rinse cycle as
the test procedure currently requires. DOE also proposes to clarify the
energy test cycle definition and the supply water test conditions
specification.
DOE has also investigated how each of the proposed amendments to
the active mode provisions for clothes washers, discussed above would
affect the measured efficiency of products. See section III.D for
further details. Because of the potential for significant impacts to
the measured efficiency of products, DOE proposes to codify the amended
clothes washer test procedure as appendix J2 in 10 CFR part 430 subpart
B. Manufacturers would not be required to use appendix J2 to
demonstrate compliance with clothes washer energy conservation
standards until the compliance date of new standards, which would take
into account any test procedure amendments. Until that time,
manufacturers would be required to use existing appendix J1.
Finally, DOE proposes to delete appendix J to subpart B of CFR part
430, along with all references to appendix J in 10 CFR part 430.23.
Appendix J only applies to clothes washers manufactured before January
1, 2004, and is now obsolete. Appendix J1 would retain its current
designation and not be re-designated as Appendix J.
III. Discussion
A. Products Covered by This Test Procedure Change
Today's proposed amendments to the DOE test procedure cover
residential clothes washers, which DOE's regulations define as follows:
Clothes washer means a consumer product designed to clean clothes,
utilizing a water solution of soap and/or detergent and mechanical
agitation or other movement, and must be one of the following classes:
automatic clothes washers, semi-automatic clothes washers, and other
clothes washers.
Automatic clothes washer means a class of clothes washer which has
a control system which is capable of scheduling a preselected
combination of operations, such as regulation of water temperature,
regulation of the water fill level, and performance of wash, rinse,
drain, and spin functions without the need for user intervention
subsequent to the initiation of machine operation. Some models may
require user intervention to initiate these different segments of the
cycle after the machine has begun operation, but they do not require
the user to intervene to regulate the water temperature by adjusting
the external water faucet valves.
Semi-automatic clothes washer means a class of clothes washer that
is the same as an automatic clothes washer except that user
intervention is required to regulate the water temperature by adjusting
the external water faucet valves.
Other clothes washer means a class of clothes washer which is not
an automatic or semi-automatic clothes washer. 10 CFR 430.2.
DOE is not proposing any amendments to these definitions in today's
NOPR. The clothes washers covered by these definitions, and by today's
proposed amendments, include top-loading compact (less than 1.6 ft\3\
capacity); top-loading standard size (1.6 ft\3\ or greater capacity);
top-loading, semi-automatic; front-loading; and suds-saving clothes
washers.
B. Compliance Date of Proposed Test Procedure
As stated previously, DOE originally considered reviewing a revised
IEC Standard 62301, expected to be released in July 2009, in the
development of these test procedure amendments. DOE received comments
in response to the August 2009 framework document
[[Page 57560]]
jointly from the Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP), the
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the National Consumer Law
Center (NCLC) (Joint Comment); and the Alliance to Save Energy (ASE),
stating that the IEC 62301 revision process may take longer than
previously thought and that DOE should proceed with updating the
clothes washer test procedure. (Joint Comment, No. 14 at p. 1 \4\; ASE,
No. 22 at p. 1) Additionally, Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships
(NEEP) commented that waiting for the IEC process to finalize could be
detrimental to the standards rulemaking, and that DOE should consider
quickly revising the test procedure independently after the IEC
procedure is finalized. (NEEP, No. 20 at p. 1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A notation in the form ``Joint Comment, No. 14 at p. 1''
identifies a written comment (1) made by ASAP, NRDC, and NCLC
jointly; (2) recorded in document number 14 that is filed in the
docket of the clothes washer energy conservation standards
rulemaking (Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-STD-0019) and maintained in the
Resource Room of the Building Technologies Program; and (3) which
appears on page 1 of document number 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE agrees that the revision to IEC Standard 62301 is expected to
be delayed; the revision is currently expected in late 2010. Therefore,
DOE proposes basing the amendments to the clothes washer test on the
first edition of IEC Standard 62301, as well as draft versions of the
second edition, in the issuance of this NOPR. Such action is necessary
to permit manufacturers to certify that their products comply with any
newly established energy conservation standards that take into account
standby and off mode energy use.
The amended test procedure would become effective 30 days after the
date of publication in the Federal Register of the final rule in this
test procedure rulemaking. However, DOE would clarify in the published
amended test procedure in 10 CFR part 430 subpart B appendix J2 that it
need not be used to determine compliance with current energy
conservation standards. Instead, manufacturers would be required to
begin using the test procedures in appendix J2 on the compliance date
of any final rule establishing amended energy conservation standards
that would, in part, address standby and off mode power consumption for
these products. 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(C).
C. Standby Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active Mode Test Procedures
1. Incorporating by Reference IEC Standard 62301 for Measuring Standby
Mode and Off Mode Power Consumption
As required by EPCA, as amended by EISA 2007, DOE considered the
most current versions of IEC Standard 62301 and IEC Standard 62087 for
measuring power consumption in standby mode and off mode when
developing today's proposed amendments to the clothes washer test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) DOE noted that IEC Standard 62301
provides for measuring standby power in electrical appliances,
including clothes washers, and thus is relevant here. DOE also reviewed
IEC Standard 62087, which specifies methods of measuring the power
consumption of TV receivers, video cassette recorders (VCRs), set top
boxes, audio equipment, and multi-function equipment for consumer use.
IEC Standard 62087 does not, however, include methods for measuring the
power consumption of electrical appliances such as clothes washers.
Therefore, DOE has determined that IEC Standard 62087 is inapplicable
to this rulemaking, and has not included any of its provisions in
today's proposed test procedure.
DOE proposes to incorporate by reference into this test procedure
all applicable provisions from Sections 4 and 5 of IEC Standard 62301.
Specifically, DOE proposes to incorporate, from section 4, (``General
conditions for measurements''), paragraph 4.2, ``Test room;'' paragraph
4.4, ``Supply voltage waveform;'' paragraph 4.5, ``Power measurement
accuracy;'' and from section 5, (``Measurements''), paragraph 5.1,
``General,'' Note 1; and paragraph 5.3, ``Procedure.'' These clauses
provide test conditions and test procedures for measuring average
standby mode and average off mode power consumption. With respect to
test conditions, section 4 of IEC Standard 62301 provides
specifications for the test room conditions, supply voltage waveform,
and power measurement meter tolerances to ensure repeatable and precise
measurements of standby mode and off mode power consumption. With
respect to test procedures, section 5 of IEC Standard 62301 provides
methods for measuring power consumption when the power measurement is
stable and when it is unstable.
DOE invites comment on whether IEC Standard 62301 measures standby
and off mode power consumption for clothes washers adequately, and
whether incorporating these specific provisions into the DOE test
procedure is appropriate.
2. Determination of Modes To Be Incorporated
EPCA provides the following mode definitions:
``Active mode'' is defined as the condition in which an energy-
using product is connected to a main power source, has been activated,
and provides one or more main functions. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(A)(i))
``Standby mode'' is defined as the condition in which an energy-
using product is connected to a main power source and offers one or
more of the following user-oriented or protective functions: to
facilitate the activation or deactivation of other functions (including
active mode) by remote switch (including remote control), internal
sensor, or timer; or continuous functions, including information or
status displays (including clocks) or sensor-based functions. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(A)(iii))
``Off mode'' is defined as the condition in which an energy-using
product is connected to a main power source and is not providing any
standby mode or active mode function. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(A)(ii))
During the September 2009 Public Meeting, ASAP commented that the
definitions provided in IEC Standard 62301 do not conform to the
statutory definitions provided by EPCA, so ASAP believed it was not
entirely clear that DOE should adopt the IEC definitions word-for-word.
(ASAP, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 7 at p. 19) \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A notation in the form ``ASAP, Public Meeting Transcript,
No. 7 at p. 19'' identifies an oral comment that DOE received during
the September 21, 2009, Framework public meeting, was recorded in
the public meeting transcript in the docket for the clothes washer
energy conservation standards rulemaking (Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-
STD-0019), and is maintained in the Resource Room of the Building
Technologies Program. This particular notation refers to a comment
(1) made by ASAP during the public meeting; (2) recorded in document
number 7, which is the public meeting transcript that is filed in
the docket of the clothes washer energy conservation standards
rulemaking; and (3) which appears on page 19 of document number 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE notes that the EPCA definition of standby mode differs from the
one provided in IEC Standard 62301, which defines standby mode as the
``lowest power consumption mode which cannot be switched off
(influenced) by the user and that may persist for an indefinite time
when an appliance is connected to the main electricity supply and used
in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.'' However, DOE
expects significant changes to the mode
[[Page 57561]]
definitions included in IEC Standard 62301, based on review of IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS. The definitions provided in IEC Standard 62301
FDIS are likely to be included in the final revised IEC Standard 62301,
Second Edition. DOE considered the definitions provided by IEC Standard
62301 FDIS as the most current when determining the mode definitions
proposed to be included in the test procedure.
EPCA authorizes DOE to amend mode definitions, as appropriate,
considering the most current versions of IEC Standards 62301 and 62087.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(B)) DOE recognizes that the EPCA definitions for
active mode, standby mode, and off mode were developed to be broadly
applicable for many energy-using products. However, for specific
products with multiple functions, these broad definitions could be
interpreted in different ways. For these reasons, DOE proposes amending
the test procedure to include definitions for these modes based on the
definitions provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS, with added
clarifications specific to clothes washers.
Active Mode
DOE proposes to define active mode as a mode in which the clothes
washer is connected to a mains power source; has been activated; and is
performing one or more of the main functions of washing, soaking,
tumbling, agitating, rinsing, and/or removing water from the clothing,
or is involved in functions necessary for these main functions, such as
admitting water into the washer or pumping water out of the washer. DOE
is proposing to refer to the typical clothes washing operation (i.e., a
complete wash cycle intended for washing a clothing load, including
washing, rinsing, and spinning) as the active washing mode. DOE is
aware of three additional relevant modes that it proposes to define as
a part of active mode: delay start mode, cycle finished mode, and self-
clean mode. DOE is proposing to include these modes in the measures of
clothes washer energy consumption, as discussed in section III.C.4.
i. Delay Start Mode
DOE proposes to define delay start mode as a mode in which
activation of the active washing mode is facilitated by a timer.
Because delay start mode is not a mode that may persist for an
indefinite time, DOE believes it would not be considered as part of a
standby mode based on the proposed definition discussed below. DOE also
notes that IEC Standard 62301 Committee Draft 2 (IEC Standard 62301
CD2) provides the additional clarification that ``delay start mode is a
one off user initiated short duration function that is associated with
an active mode.'' The subsequent IEC Standard 62301 Committee Draft for
Vote (IEC Standard 62301 CDV) removes this clarification; however, in
response to comments on IEC Standard 62301 CD2 that led to IEC Standard
62301 CDV, IEC states that delay start mode is a one off function of
limited duration. DOE infers that delay start mode should therefore be
considered part of active mode. DOE notes that IEC 62301 FDIS
classifies delay start as a secondary function and therefore not part
of active mode. DOE continues to believe, however, that because delay
start is of limited duration and is uniquely associated with the
initiation of a main function (i.e., washing cycle), it should be
considered part of active mode. The proposed methods for measuring
energy consumption in delay start mode are discussed in III.C.3.
ii. Cycle Finished Mode
DOE proposes to define cycle finished mode as a mode that provides
continuous status display following operation in the active washing
mode. However, as with delay start mode, cycle finished mode is not a
mode that may persist for an indefinite time, and would therefore not
be considered as a part of standby mode. Additionally, operation in
cycle finished mode occurs only after operation in the active washing
mode. DOE believes cycle finished mode, similar to delay start mode,
would be considered a one off short duration function that is
associated with an active mode. DOE is therefore proposing to define
cycle finished mode as a part of active mode. The proposed methods for
measuring energy consumption in cycle finished mode are discussed in
III.C.3.
DOE is aware that some clothes washers currently available offer
energy-consuming features in cycle finished mode other than a
continuous status display. For example, certain models may employ a
low-power fan to circulate air around the damp clothes to prevent
odors. These models may also periodically tumble the clothes to prevent
wrinkles for up to 10 hours after the completion of the wash cycle.
These functions, while enabled, would use more energy than the
continuous display normally associated with cycle finished mode.
However, DOE does not propose amending the test procedure to address
these specific cycle finished mode functions, because DOE believes
measuring the energy use from these functions would significantly
increase the test cycle duration to capture a negligible contributor to
annual energy consumption. In addition, DOE research indicates that
only eight out of the 94 residential clothes washer models currently
produced by manufacturers representing more than 92 percent of the
residential clothes washer market incorporate such a circulation or
tumbling function. Because these models are also higher priced and
recently introduced, DOE believes that the shipment-weighted percentage
of residential clothes washers with a circulation or tumbling function
in cycle finished mode is less than 5 percent. Therefore, DOE believes
the energy consumed by these features in cycle finished mode represents
a negligible portion of the overall energy consumption of clothes
washers.
iii. Self-Clean Mode
DOE proposes to define self-clean mode as a clothes washer
operating mode that:
Is dedicated to cleaning, deodorizing, or sanitizing the
clothes washer by eliminating sources of odor, bacteria, mold, and
mildew;
Is recommended to be run intermittently by the
manufacturer; and
Is separate from clothes washing cycles.
Self-clean mode is considered a part of the active mode because it
is a function necessary for the main functions associated with washing
clothes. A clothes washer with excessive bacteria, mildew, or odor
cannot effectively wash clothes. A further discussion of self-clean
mode, including its incorporation in the clothes washer test procedure,
is included in section III.D.1.b.
Standby Mode
DOE proposes to define standby mode as any mode in which the
clothes washer is connected to a mains power source and offers one or
more of the following user-oriented or protective functions which may
persist for an indefinite time: \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The actual language for the standby mode definition in IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS describes ``* * *user oriented or protective
functions which usually persist'' rather than ``* * * user oriented
or protective functions which may persist for an indefinite time.''
DOE notes, however, that section 5.1 of IEC Standard 62301 FDIS
states that ``a mode is considered to be persistent where the power
level is constant or where there are several power levels that occur
in a regular sequence for an indefinite period of time.'' DOE
believes that the proposed language, which was originally included
in IEC Standard 62301 CD2, encompasses the possible scenarios
foreseen by section 5.1 of IEC Standard 62301 FDIS without
unnecessary specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilitation of the activation of other modes (including
activation or deactivation of active mode) by remote
[[Page 57562]]
switch (including remote control), internal sensor, or timer;
Continuous function: Information or status displays
including clocks; and
Continuous function: Sensor-based functions.
DOE proposes adding a clarification of what would be considered a
timer under this definition of standby mode. DOE would clarify that a
timer is a continuous clock function (which may or may not be
associated with a display) that provides regular scheduled tasks (e.g.,
switching) and that operates on a continuous basis. As noted earlier in
this section, this proposed definition was developed based on the
definition provided in IEC Standard 62301 FDIS. It expands on the EPCA
mode definition to provide additional clarifications as to which
functions are associated with standby mode.
The proposed definition of standby mode based on IEC Standard 62301
FDIS allows for multiple modes to be considered a standby mode. DOE has
identified only one mode that would be considered a standby mode under
the proposed definition. DOE proposes to define this ``inactive mode''
as a standby mode that facilitates the activation of active mode by
remote switch (including remote control), internal sensor, or timer, or
that provides continuous status display. DOE proposes amending the test
procedure for clothes washers to include provisions for measuring
energy use in inactive mode as the measurement of standby energy use.
Although it identified only this one particular standby mode, DOE
remains open to consideration of additional standby modes.
Off Mode
As discussed in section III.C.1, DOE proposes in today's NOPR to
amend the DOE test procedure for clothes washers to define ``off mode''
as any mode in which the clothes washer is connected to a mains power
source and is not providing any standby mode or active mode function
and the mode may persist for an indefinite time. An indicator that only
shows the user that the product is in the off position is included
within the off mode classification. As noted in section III.C.1, this
definition was developed based on the definitions provided in IEC
Standard 62301 FDIS. It expands on the EPCA mode definitions to provide
additional clarifications as to which functions are associated with off
mode.
Under the proposed definitions, a clothes washer equipped with a
mechanical on/off switch that can disconnect power to the display and/
or control components would be considered as operating in the off mode
when the switch is in the ``off'' position, provided that no other
standby or active mode functions are energized. An energized light-
emitting diode (LED) or other indicator that only shows the user that
the product is in the off position would be considered part of off mode
under the proposed definition, again provided that no other standby or
active mode functions are energized. As stated above, however, if any
energy is consumed by the appliance in the presence of a one-way remote
control, the unit would be operating in standby mode under the proposed
definition. That definition would include remote controls that
facilitate the activation or deactivation of other functions (including
active mode) as a feature of standby mode.
IEC Standard 62301 FDIS also provides definitions for additional
modes that DOE determined are not applicable to the clothes washer test
procedure. Section 3.7 of IEC Standard 62301 FDIS defines network mode
as a mode category that includes ``any product modes where the energy
using product is connected to a mains power source and at least one
network function is activated (such as reactivation via network command
or network integrity communication) but where the primary function is
not active.'' IEC Standard 62301 FDIS also provides a note, stating
that ``[w]here a network function is provided but is not active and/or
not connected to a network, then this mode is not applicable. A network
function could become active intermittently according to a fixed
schedule or in response to a network requirement. A `network' in this
context includes communication between two or more separate
independently powered devices or products. A network does not include
one or more controls which are dedicated to a single product. Network
mode may include one or more standby functions.'' As discussed further
in section III.D.1.c, DOE is not proposing any amendments to include
provisions for testing network mode energy consumption in clothes
washers.
DOE also notes that section 3.9 of IEC Standard 62301 FDIS provides
a definition of ``disconnected mode'', which is ``the state where all
connections to mains power sources of the energy using product are
removed or interrupted.'' IEC Standard 62301 FDIS also adds a note that
common terms such as ``unplugged'' or ``cut off from mains'' also
describe this mode and that this mode is not part of the lower power
mode category. DOE believes that there would be no energy use in a
disconnected mode, and therefore, is not proposing a definition or
testing methods for such a mode in the DOE test procedure for clothes
washers.
DOE welcomes comment on the proposed establishment of the modes as
discussed above, including inactive mode as the only standby mode for
clothes washers. DOE also invites comment on the determination that
delay start mode and cycle finished mode would be considered part of
active mode. DOE further invites comment on the proposed mode
definitions, including the definition of self-clean mode, and whether
there are any modes that have not been identified in this NOPR that
represent significant energy use and are consistent with the proposed
active mode, standby mode, or off mode definitions.
3. Adding Specifications for the Test Methods and Measurements for
Standby Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active Mode Testing
This section discusses the provisions DOE proposes to include in
the test procedure to clarify the IEC Standard 62301 methods when used
to measure standby mode and off mode energy use in clothes washers.
These proposed procedures also include provisions for measuring energy
use in delay start mode and cycle finished mode. Although these modes
are considered a part of active mode under the proposed definitions,
the methods for measuring their associated energy consumptions are
similar to those used for standby mode and off mode.
Paragraph 5.3.1 of section 5.3 of IEC Standard 62301 contains
provisions for measuring power. It specifies, for products in which the
power is stable (i.e., power varies by not more than 5 percent from a
maximum level during a period of 5 minutes), waiting at least 5 minutes
for the product to stabilize and then measuring the power at the end of
an additional time period of not less than 5 minutes. Paragraph 5.3.2
contains provisions for measuring average power in cases where the
power is not stable (i.e., power varies by more than 5 percent from a
maximum level during a period of 5 minutes). In such cases, IEC
Standard 62301 requires a measurement period of no less than 5 minutes,
or one or more complete operating cycles of several minutes or hours.
DOE notes these provisions do not preclude manufacturers from testing
products with a longer stabilization period, or a longer measurement
period (if the power varies by not more than 5 percent or if that
period represents one or more complete cycles).
[[Page 57563]]
Displays on residential clothes washers may reduce power
consumption by dimming or turning off after a certain period of user
inactivity (``automatic power-down''). For clothes washers whose power
input in standby, off, and cycle finished modes varies in this manner
during testing, DOE proposes that the test be conducted after the power
level has dropped to its lowest level, as discussed in IEC Standard
62301, section 5, (``Measurements''), paragraph 5.1, ``General,'' Note
1. DOE is aware that IEC Standard 62301 does not provide guidance on
how long to wait for the appliance to drop to the lower-power state.
DOE observed during tests of 17 residential clothes washers that in
units with an automatic power-down feature the higher-power state
persists for less than 10 minutes of inactivity after the display has
been energized. Thus, the energy consumption at the low-power level is
most representative of standby mode, off mode, and cycle finished mode
power. However, DOE notes the test sample of 17 clothes washers was
relatively small. It is possible that some clothes washers may remain
in the higher-power state for the duration of a 5-minute stabilization
period and 5-minute measurement period, and then drop to the lower-
power state that is more representative of standby mode, off mode, or
cycle finished mode. In contrast, IEC Standard 62301 CDV specifies for
each testing method that the product be allowed to stabilize for at
least 30 minutes prior to a measurement period of not less than 10
minutes. DOE believes this method would allow sufficient time for
displays that automatically dim or power down after a period of user
inactivity to reach the lower-power state prior to measurement. Based
on the automatic power-down time periods observed in its own testing,
DOE believes that the IEC Standard 62301 CDV 30-minute stabilization
and 10-minute measurement periods provide a clearer and more consistent
testing procedure than the corresponding time periods specified in IEC
Standard 62301. Those periods allow for representative measurements to
be made among products that may have varying time periods before the
power drops to a lower level more representative of standby, off, or
cycle finished mode. DOE notes that IEC Standard 62301 FDIS establishes
an overall test period of not less than 15 minutes for products in
which power consumption in the mode being tested is not cyclic. Data
collected during the first third of the total period is discarded (and
thus this time could be inferred to be a stabilization period), and
data from the remaining two-thirds of the total period are used to
determine whether the power is stable. If stability is not achieved,
the total period is extended continuously until the stability criteria
are achieved, to a maximum of 3 hours. Modes that are known to be non-
cyclic and of varying power consumption shall follow this same
procedure, but with a total test period not less than 60 minutes. If
power consumption in a mode is cyclic, measurements must be conducted
with an initial operation period (analogous to a stabilization period)
of at least 10 minutes, and the average power measured over at least
four complete cycles. The measurement period must be at least 20
minutes. DOE believes that the specifications provided in IEC Standard
62301 FDIS would not produce power consumption measurements as
accurate, repeatable, and enforceable as the specifications provided in
IEC Standard 62301 CDV. Therefore, DOE proposes to require that: (1)
the product be allowed to stabilize for at least 30 minutes, then (2)
the power measurement be made for a period not less than 10 minutes for
inactive, off, and cycle finished modes.
DOE's test procedures are developed to measure representative
energy use for the typical consumer, and cannot capture all possible
consumer actions and appliance usage patterns that might increase
energy use. For example, certain residential clothes washer models
featuring a display power-down may allow consumers to alter the display
settings to increase the amount of time in the high-power state, or to
make the high-power state permanent. Because DOE does not have
information regarding the likelihood consumer will alter the default
display settings, DOE has not proposed additional provisions in today's
NOPR to address the possibility of increased energy use as a result of
consumers adjusting the display power-down settings or other features.
DOE welcomes comment on the suitability of using the default settings
in testing standby energy consumption. It also welcomes comment on any
methodologies that can account for consumer actions that might increase
energy use, and requests data on the repeatability of such testing
procedures.
DOE understands that clothes washers with a delay start capability
may use varying amounts of power during delay start mode, depending on
the delay time entered, the amount of remaining delay time displayed,
and/or display indication of mode status. To ensure comparable and
valid results, DOE proposes to include in its clothes washer test
procedure a specification for the delay start time to be set at 5
hours, and for power to be monitored for 60 minutes after waiting at
least 5 minutes for power input to stabilize. In determining the
specification for delay start parameters, DOE considered the
possibility that display power input would depend on the time
displayed, which is typically the time in hours remaining before the
start. Displays may be one or two digits. Some two-digit displays may
show whole numbers for remaining delay hours of 10 or more and both the
ones and tenths digits for the remaining delay hours of 9.9 or less.
DOE analyzed the number of LEDs activated in LED displays of the
remaining hours over a range of delay times. It concluded that the
average number of LEDs lit for the range of all possible delay times
would be best approximated by determining the average number of LEDs
lit for either single-digit or two-digit displays in a 60-minute test
if the delay time is set at 5 hours. DOE welcomes comment on this
approach to measuring delay start mode.
DOE is also proposing that test room ambient temperatures for
standby mode and off mode testing, as well as delay start mode and
cycle finished mode testing, be specified for all clothes washers
according to section 4, paragraph 4.2 of IEC Standard 62301. The
current DOE test procedure includes a test room ambient air temperature
specification only for water-heating clothes washers, for which the
requirement is 75 5 degrees Fahrenheit ([deg]F). This
falls within the range specified by IEC Standard 62301 of 73.4 9 [deg]F. Today's proposed test procedure would allow
manufacturers of water-heating clothes washers to use the more
stringent ambient temperature range in the current DOE test procedure
if tests of active washing mode performance and standby, off, delay
start, and cycle finished mode power are conducted simultaneously in
the same room on multiple clothes washers. Alternatively, the proposed
temperature specifications taken from IEC Standard 62301 would allow a
manufacturer that opts to conduct standby, off, delay start, and cycle
finished mode testing separately from active washing mode testing more
latitude in maintaining ambient conditions. DOE requests comment on the
appropriateness of this proposed modified test room ambient temperature
range.
4. Calculation of Energy Use Associated With Each Operating Mode
To combine active washing mode energy consumption with energy
[[Page 57564]]
consumption from inactive, off, and additional active modes (delay
start, cycle finished, and self-clean modes), DOE estimated the
representative energy use for each of these modes. The total energy
consumption in each of these modes depends on both the power level of
that mode and the time spent in that mode. This section discusses the
approach DOE proposes for calculating energy use associated with each
operating mode for clothes washers and the numbers of hours proposed to
be associated with each mode.
Energy use for clothes washers is expressed in terms of ft \3\ of
wash load capacity per total energy use per wash cycle.\7\ As discussed
further in section III.E.2, DOE has tentatively determined that it is
technically feasible to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode
energy use into the overall energy use metric, as required by the EISA
2007 amendments to EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) Therefore, DOE has
examined standby mode and off mode power consumption in terms of annual
energy use apportioned on a per-cycle basis. DOE has also examined
energy consumption from delay start, cycle finished, and self-clean
modes on a per-cycle basis. Energy used during an active washing mode
test cycle is directly measured in the current DOE test procedure, and
a weighted average is calculated under different load sizes, fill
levels, and wash temperature conditions according to the specific
machine's capacity and features. (See section 4.1 of appendix J1 of
subpart B of 10 CFR 430 for details.) The calculation of MEF also
includes nominal energy used by a water heater to heat the water
supplied to the clothes washer, and by a dryer to remove the remaining
moisture after the clothes washer completes its full cycle (weighted by
a dryer usage factor (DUF) to account for loads not dried in a clothes
dryer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See section III.C.5 for a detailed description of how the
efficiency metric is calculated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average cycle times can vary significantly based on the axis of
basket rotation and type of load. One 1997 study compared a 37-minute
normal cycle for a vertical-axis, top-loading clothes washer with 40 to
110-minute cycles for eight different front-loading, horizontal-axis
machines.\8\ The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported in
2005 on three studies in the magazine ``Consumer Reports'' \9\ that
determined top-loading clothes washers have ``normal'' cycle times of
37-55 minutes, and front-loading washers have ``normal'' cycle times of
51-105 minutes.\10\ Therefore, DOE proposes to adopt the estimate of 1
hour per cycle associated with a residential clothes washer's typical
active washing mode (i.e., a complete wash cycle including washing,
rinsing, and spinning). DOE is proposing a single cycle duration for
both top-loading and front-loading clothes washers rather than more
accurate cycle times specific to each product class to simplify the
test procedure and calculations. Additionally, proposing cycle times
for each product class would have an insignificant effect on the
calculations proposed in the test procedure because it is used only to
allocate the number of annual hours associated with inactive/off mode.
For example, using cycle times of 45 minutes for top-loaders and 75
minutes for front-loaders would change the number of hours allocated to
inactive/off mode (the only modes affected by the number of active mode
hours) by less than 1 percent.
-------------------------------------