New Postal Product, 57303-57304 [2010-23404]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Notices
will discuss the recommendations
of the Planning and Procedures
Subcommittee regarding items
proposed for consideration by the
Full Committee during future ACRS
Meetings, and matters related to the
conduct of ACRS business,
including anticipated workload and
member assignments. [Note: A
portion of this meeting may be
closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational
and personnel matters that relate
solely to internal personnel rules
and practices of ACRS, and
information the release of which
would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy]
2:45 p.m.–3 p.m.: Reconciliation of
ACRS Comments and
Recommendations (Open)—The
Committee will discuss the
responses from the NRC Executive
Director for Operations to
comments and recommendations
included in recent ACRS reports
and letters.
3:15 p.m.–4:15 p.m.: Assessment of the
Quality of Selected NRC Research
Projects (Open)—The Committee
will hold discussions with members
of the ACRS Panels performing the
quality assessment of the NRC
research projects on: NUREG/CR–
6947, ‘‘Human Factors
Consideration with Respect to
Emerging Technology in Nuclear
Power Plants,’’ and NUREG/CR–
6997, ‘‘Modeling a Digital
Feedwater Control System Using
Traditional Probabilistic Risk
Assessment Methods.’’
4:15 p.m.–5:45 p.m.: Preparation for
Meeting with the Commission on
November 5, 2010 (Open)—The
Committee will discuss the topics
for meeting with the Commission
on November 5, 2010.
6 p.m.–7 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS
Reports (Open)—The Committee
will continue its discussion of
proposed ACRS reports.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Saturday, October 9, 2010, Conference
Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North,
Rockville, Maryland
8:30 a.m.–3 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS
Reports (Open)—The Committee
will continue its discussion of
proposed ACRS reports.
3 p.m.–3:30 p.m.: Miscellaneous
(Open)—The Committee will
discuss matters related to the
conduct of Committee activities and
specific issues that were not
completed during previous
meetings.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 52829–52830).
In accordance with those procedures,
oral or written views may be presented
by members of the public, including
representatives of the nuclear industry.
Persons desiring to make oral statements
should notify Ms. Ilka Berrios,
Cognizant ACRS Staff (Telephone: 301–
415–3179, E-mail: Ilka.Berrios@nrc.gov),
five days before the meeting, if possible,
so that appropriate arrangements can be
made to allow necessary time during the
meeting for such statements. In view of
the possibility that the schedule for
ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the
Chairman as necessary to facilitate the
conduct of the meeting, persons
planning to attend should check with
the Cognizant ACRS staff if such
rescheduling would result in major
inconvenience.
Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided 30 minutes before the meeting.
In addition, one electronic copy of each
presentation should be emailed to the
Cognizant ACRS Staff one day before
meeting. If an electronic copy cannot be
provided within this timeframe,
presenters should provide the Cognizant
ACRS Staff with a CD containing each
presentation at least 30 minutes before
the meeting.
In accordance with Subsection 10(d)
Public Law 92–463, and 5 U.S.C.
552b(c), certain portions of this meeting
may be closed, as specifically noted
above. Use of still, motion picture, and
television cameras during the meeting
may be limited to selected portions of
the meeting as determined by the
Chairman. Electronic recordings will be
permitted only during the open portions
of the meeting.
ACRS meeting agenda, meeting
transcripts, and letter reports are
available through the NRC Public
Document Room at
pdr.resource@nrc.gov, or by calling the
PDR at 1–800–397–4209, or from the
Publicly Available Records System
(PARS) component of NRC’s document
system (ADAMS) which is accessible
from the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html or
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/ACRS/.
Video teleconferencing service is
available for observing open sessions of
ACRS meetings. Those wishing to use
this service for observing ACRS
meetings should contact Mr. Theron
Brown, ACRS Audio Visual Technician
(301–415–8066), between 7:30 a.m. and
3:45 p.m. (ET), at least 10 days before
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57303
the meeting to ensure the availability of
this service.
Individuals or organizations
requesting this service will be
responsible for telephone line charges
and for providing the equipment and
facilities that they use to establish the
video teleconferencing link. The
availability of video teleconferencing
services is not guaranteed.
Dated: September 14, 2010.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–23380 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010–105 through CP2010–
115; Order No. 535]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently–filed Postal Service request to
add 11 Global Expedited Package
Services 3 contracts to the Global
Expedited Package Services product.
This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with this filing.
DATES: Comments are due: September
20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On September 10, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice announcing that it
has entered into 11 additional Global
Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3)
contracts.1 The Postal Service believes
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
Eleven Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements
and Application For Non–Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, September 10, 2010
(Notice).
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
57304
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Notices
the instant contracts are functionally
equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and are supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice explains that
Order No. 86, which established GEPS
1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290,
the Commission approved the GEPS 2
product.2 In Order No. 503, the
Commission approved the GEPS 3
product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in
Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the
baseline contract for future functional
equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3
product.
The instant contracts. The Postal
Service filed the instant contracts
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that each
contract is in accordance with Order No.
86. The Postal Service that relates that
two of the instant contracts, which
expire September 30, 2010, are
successor contracts for the same
customers as in Docket Nos. CP2009–64
and CP2009–65, respectively. The term
of each contract is 1 year from the date
the Postal Service notifies the customer
that all necessary regulatory approvals
have been received. Notice at 3–4.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
• Attachments 1A through 1K—
redacted copies of the 11 contracts and
applicable annexes;
• Attachments 2A through 2K—
certified statements required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which
establishes prices and classifications for
GEPS contracts, a description of
applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis of the formulas, and
certification of the Governors’ vote; and
• Attachment 4—an application for
non–public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contracts and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for GEPS. The Postal Service identifies
customer–specific information and
general contract terms that distinguish
2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
the instant contracts from the baseline
GEPS 3 agreement. Id. at 5. It states that
the differences, which include price
variations based on updated costing
information and volume commitments,
do not alter the contracts’ functional
equivalency. Id. at 4–5. The Postal
Service asserts that ‘‘[b]ecause the
agreements incorporate the same cost
attributes and methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these 11 GEPS
contracts are similar, if not the same, as
the relevant characteristics of previously
filed contracts.’’ Id. at 5.
The Postal Service concludes that its
filings demonstrate that each of the new
GEPS 3 contracts complies with the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests
that the instant contracts be included
within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 6.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–105 through CP2010–115
for consideration of matters related to
the contracts identified in the Postal
Service’s Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a
consolidated basis for purposes of this
order. Filings with respect to a
particular contract should be filed in
that docket.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s contracts are consistent with
the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642. Comments are due no later than
September 20, 2010. The public
portions of these filings can be accessed
via the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned
proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–105 through CP2010–115
for consideration of matters raised by
the Postal Service’s Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
September 20, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as the
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–23404 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. RM2010–12; Order No. 534]
Periodic Reporting Proposals
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service has
requested changes in six analytical
methods approved for use in periodic
reporting. This document summarizes
the proposals and invites public
comment.
DATES: Comments are due October 8,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 8, 2010, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 to initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes in the analytical methods
approved for use in periodic reporting.1
Six separate proposals are included in
the Petition labeled as Proposals Three
through Eight.
Proposal Three involves City Carrier
costs. The Postal Service asserts that the
City Carrier Cost System is capturing
more detailed information regarding
direct bundles. The proposal would
incorporate this new information by
assigning relevant costs for direct
bundles to the products that utilize
them.
Proposal Four would change the way
certain In–Office Cost System (IOCS)
acceptance costs are allocated. The
change would apply to mailpieces
accepted at a window, which bear non–
retail indicia, and host an extra service
other than Registered Mail.2 Currently,
acceptance costs are assigned to the
extra service. The Postal Service
proposes to modify this methodology by
assigning acceptance costs to the host
mailpiece.
Proposal Five involves utilizing the
more detailed information now being
captured by the Rural Carrier Cost
System regarding collected prepaid
SUMMARY:
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service
Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytic Principles (Proposals
Three—Eight), September 8, 2010 (Petition).
2 The extra services include Certified, Insured,
Return Receipt, Delivery Confirmation, and COD.
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 181 (Monday, September 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57303-57304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23404]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010-105 through CP2010-115; Order No. 535]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to add 11 Global Expedited Package Services 3 contracts to the
Global Expedited Package Services product. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with this filing.
DATES: Comments are due: September 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should contact the person identified
in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on
alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On September 10, 2010, the Postal Service filed a notice announcing
that it has entered into 11 additional Global Expedited Package
Services 3 (GEPS 3) contracts.\1\ The Postal Service believes
[[Page 57304]]
the instant contracts are functionally equivalent to previously
submitted GEPS contracts, and are supported by Governors' Decision No.
08-7, attached to the Notice and originally filed in Docket No. CP2008-
4. Id. at 1, Attachment 3. The Notice explains that Order No. 86, which
established GEPS 1 as a product, also authorized functionally
equivalent agreements to be included within the product, provided that
they meet the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No.
290, the Commission approved the GEPS 2 product.\2\ In Order No. 503,
the Commission approved the GEPS 3 product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in Docket No. CP2010-71 serve as
the baseline contract for future functional equivalence analyses of the
GEPS 3 product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing Eleven
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package Services 3
Negotiated Service Agreements and Application For Non-Public
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, September 10, 2010
(Notice).
\2\ Docket No. CP2009-50, Order Granting Clarification and
Adding Global Expedited Package Services 2 to the Competitive
Product List, August 28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The instant contracts. The Postal Service filed the instant
contracts pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, the Postal Service
contends that each contract is in accordance with Order No. 86. The
Postal Service that relates that two of the instant contracts, which
expire September 30, 2010, are successor contracts for the same
customers as in Docket Nos. CP2009-64 and CP2009-65, respectively. The
term of each contract is 1 year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3-4.
In support of its Notice, the Postal Service filed four attachments
as follows:
Attachments 1A through 1K--redacted copies of the 11
contracts and applicable annexes;
Attachments 2A through 2K--certified statements required
by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
Attachment 3--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
08-7 which establishes prices and classifications for GEPS contracts, a
description of applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for prices, an
analysis of the formulas, and certification of the Governors' vote; and
Attachment 4--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contracts and supporting
documents under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the instant GEPS 3 contracts fit
within the Mail Classification Schedule language for GEPS. The Postal
Service identifies customer-specific information and general contract
terms that distinguish the instant contracts from the baseline GEPS 3
agreement. Id. at 5. It states that the differences, which include
price variations based on updated costing information and volume
commitments, do not alter the contracts' functional equivalency. Id. at
4-5. The Postal Service asserts that ``[b]ecause the agreements
incorporate the same cost attributes and methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these 11 GEPS contracts are similar, if not the
same, as the relevant characteristics of previously filed contracts.''
Id. at 5.
The Postal Service concludes that its filings demonstrate that each
of the new GEPS 3 contracts complies with the requirements of 39 U.S.C.
3633 and is functionally equivalent to the baseline GEPS 3 contract.
Therefore, it requests that the instant contracts be included within
the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 6.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-105 through CP2010-
115 for consideration of matters related to the contracts identified in
the Postal Service's Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for purposes of
this order. Filings with respect to a particular contract should be
filed in that docket.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's contracts are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642. Comments are due no later than September 20, 2010. The
public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's
Web site (http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-105 through
CP2010-115 for consideration of matters raised by the Postal Service's
Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than September 20, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as the officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23404 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S