Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama: Birmingham; Determination of Attaining Data for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particulate Standard, 57186-57187 [2010-23318]
Download as PDF
57186
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 27. Add § 721.10224 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10224
Diglycidylaniline (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as diglycidylaniline (PMN
P–10–9) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(3), (b) (concentration
set at 0.1 percent), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (v)(1), (w)(1), and
(x)(1).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as
specified in § 721.90 (a)(1), (b)(1), and
(c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 28. Add § 721.10225 to subpart E to
read as follows:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
§ 721.10225 Quino[2,3-b] acridine-7,14dione, 2,9-dichloro-5,12-dihydro [4-[[2(sulfooxy) ethyl] substituted] phenyl]-,
sodium salt (1:1) (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as quino[2,3-b] acridine7,14-dione, 2,9-dichloro-5,12-dihydro
[4-[[2-(sulfooxy) ethyl] substituted]
phenyl]-, sodium salt (1:1) (PMN P–10–
14) is subject to reporting under this
section for the significant new uses
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(iii), (a)(3), (b)
(concentration set at 1.0 percent), and
(c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (j), (v)(1), (w)(1),
and (x)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:28 Sep 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (i) are applicable
to manufacturers, importers, and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to this section.
[FR Doc. 2010–23415 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0203–201035;
FRL–9202–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Alabama:
Birmingham; Determination of
Attaining Data for the 2006 24-Hour
Fine Particulate Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On February 24, 2010, the
State of Alabama, through the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM), submitted a
request to EPA to make a determination
that the Birmingham, Alabama,
nonattainment area has attained the
24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) based on quality assured,
quality controlled monitoring data from
2007–2009. The Birmingham, Alabama,
2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the
Birmingham Area’’) is comprised of
Jefferson and Shelby Counties in their
entireties, and a portion of Walker
County in Alabama. In this action, EPA
is taking final action to determine that
the Birmingham Area has attained the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. This clean
data determination is based upon
complete, quality assured, quality
controlled, and certified ambient air
monitoring data for the years 2007–2009
showing that the Birmingham Area has
monitored attainment of the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on October 20, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0203. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Waterson, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms.
Waterson may be reached by phone at
(404) 562–9061 or via electronic mail at
waterson.sara@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. What action is EPA taking?
II. What is the effect of this action?
III. What is EPA’s final action?
IV. What are the statutory and Executive
order reviews?
I. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action to
determine that the Birmingham Area
(comprised of Jefferson and Shelby
Counties in their entireties and a
portion of Walker County) has attaining
data for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
This clean data determination is based
upon quality assured, quality controlled
and certified ambient air monitoring
data that shows the Area has monitored
attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS based on the 2007–2009 data.
While still preliminary, the available
2010 24-hour PM2.5 data also monitored
attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard.
Other specific requirements of the
clean data determination and the
rationale for EPA’s action are explained
in the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPR) published on June 14, 2010 (75
FR 33562) and will not be restated here.
The comment period closed on July 14,
2010. No comments, adverse or
otherwise, were received in response to
the NPR.
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 181 / Monday, September 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
II. What is the effect of this action?
This final action, in accordance with
40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the
requirements for this Area to submit an
attainment demonstration, associated
reasonably available control measures,
reasonable further progress plan,
contingency measures, and other
planning SIPs related to attainment of
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS as long
as this Area continues to meet the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Finalizing this
action does not constitute a
redesignation of the Birmingham Area
to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). Further, finalizing
this action does not involve approving
maintenance plans for the Area as
required under section 175A of the
CAA, nor does it involve a
determination that the Area has met all
requirements for a redesignation.
Additionally, this action is not in
regards to the Birmingham Area’s status
for the 1997 PM2.5 standard.
III. What is EPA’s final action?
EPA is taking final action to
determine that the Birmingham Area
has attaining data for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This clean data
determination is based upon quality
assured, quality controlled, and certified
ambient air monitoring data showing
that this Area has monitored attainment
of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
during the period 2007–2009. This final
action, in accordance with 40 CFR
51.1004(c), will suspend the
requirements for this Area to submit an
attainment demonstration, associated
reasonably available control measures,
reasonable further progress plans,
contingency measures, and other
planning SIPs related to attainment of
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS as long
as the Area continues to meet the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is taking
this final action because it is in
accordance with the CAA and EPA
policy and guidance.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
IV. What are statutory and Executive
order reviews?
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission or
State request that complies with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions or State request, EPA’s role
is to approve State choices, provided
that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:28 Sep 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the
impacted area is not in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
57187
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 19, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action,
pertaining to the determination of
attaining data for the 2006 24-hour fine
particulate matter standard for the
Birmingham Area, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter.
Dated: September 3, 2010 .
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B—Alabama
2. Section 52.62 is amended by adding
(a) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.62 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides and
particulate matter.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Determination of Attaining Data.
EPA has determined, as of September
20, 2010, the Birmingham, Alabama,
nonattainment area has attaining data
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
This clean data determination, in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c),
suspends the requirements for this area
to submit an attainment demonstration,
associated reasonably available control
measures, a reasonable further progress
plan, contingency measures, and other
planning SIPs related to attainment of
the standard for as long as this area
continues to meet the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2010–23318 Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 181 (Monday, September 20, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57186-57187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23318]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0203-201035; FRL-9202-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama:
Birmingham; Determination of Attaining Data for the 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particulate Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 24, 2010, the State of Alabama, through the
Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), submitted a
request to EPA to make a determination that the Birmingham, Alabama,
nonattainment area has attained the 24-hour fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) based
on quality assured, quality controlled monitoring data from 2007-2009.
The Birmingham, Alabama, 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as ``the Birmingham Area'') is comprised of
Jefferson and Shelby Counties in their entireties, and a portion of
Walker County in Alabama. In this action, EPA is taking final action to
determine that the Birmingham Area has attained the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This clean data determination is based upon
complete, quality assured, quality controlled, and certified ambient
air monitoring data for the years 2007-2009 showing that the Birmingham
Area has monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on October 20,
2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0203. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Waterson, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Waterson may be reached
by phone at (404) 562-9061 or via electronic mail at
waterson.sara@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking?
II. What is the effect of this action?
III. What is EPA's final action?
IV. What are the statutory and Executive order reviews?
I. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action to determine that the Birmingham Area
(comprised of Jefferson and Shelby Counties in their entireties and a
portion of Walker County) has attaining data for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This clean data determination is based upon
quality assured, quality controlled and certified ambient air
monitoring data that shows the Area has monitored attainment of the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS based on the 2007-2009 data. While
still preliminary, the available 2010 24-hour PM2.5 data
also monitored attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard.
Other specific requirements of the clean data determination and the
rationale for EPA's action are explained in the notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) published on June 14, 2010 (75 FR 33562) and will not
be restated here. The comment period closed on July 14, 2010. No
comments, adverse or otherwise, were received in response to the NPR.
[[Page 57187]]
II. What is the effect of this action?
This final action, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends
the requirements for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration,
associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further
progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to
attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS as long as this
Area continues to meet the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
Finalizing this action does not constitute a redesignation of the
Birmingham Area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Further,
finalizing this action does not involve approving maintenance plans for
the Area as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor does it involve
a determination that the Area has met all requirements for a
redesignation. Additionally, this action is not in regards to the
Birmingham Area's status for the 1997 PM2.5 standard.
III. What is EPA's final action?
EPA is taking final action to determine that the Birmingham Area
has attaining data for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. This
clean data determination is based upon quality assured, quality
controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that this
Area has monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS during the period 2007-2009. This final action, in accordance
with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), will suspend the requirements for this Area to
submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available
control measures, reasonable further progress plans, contingency
measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2006 24-
hour PM2.5 NAAQS as long as the Area continues to meet the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is taking this final action
because it is in accordance with the CAA and EPA policy and guidance.
IV. What are statutory and Executive order reviews?
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission or State request that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR
52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions or State request, EPA's
role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria
of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the impacted area is not in Indian country located in the
State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs
on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 19, 2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action, pertaining to the determination of attaining data
for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter standard for the
Birmingham Area, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce
its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter.
Dated: September 3, 2010 .
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B--Alabama
0
2. Section 52.62 is amended by adding (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.62 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides and particulate matter.
* * * * *
(a) Determination of Attaining Data. EPA has determined, as of
September 20, 2010, the Birmingham, Alabama, nonattainment area has
attaining data for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. This clean
data determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the
requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration,
associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further
progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to
attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2010-23318 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P