Camas National Wildlife Refuge, Jefferson County, ID; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment, 57053-57055 [2010-23243]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
HUD
announces its intention to sell in SFLS
2010 certain unsubsidized nonperforming mortgage loans (Mortgage
Loans) secured by single family
properties located throughout the
United States. A listing of the Mortgage
Loans will be included in the due
diligence materials made available to
bidders. The Mortgage Loans will be
sold without FHA insurance and with
servicing released. HUD will offer
qualified bidders an opportunity to bid
competitively on the Mortgage Loans.
The Mortgage Loans may be stratified
for bidding purposes into several
mortgage loan pools based on the
geographic location of the underlying
properties. Qualified bidders may
submit bids on one or more pools of
Mortgage Loans.
This is a sale of unsubsidized
mortgage loans, which are to be
assigned to HUD pursuant to section
204(a)(1)(A) of the National Housing Act
(the NHA), amended under Title VI of
the Departments of Veterans Affairs and
Housing and Urban Development and
Independent Agencies Appropriations
Act, 1999. The sale of the loans is
pursuant to section 204(g) of the NHA.
The Bidding Process
The BIP describes in detail the
procedure for bidding in SFLS 2010.
The BIP also includes a standardized
non-negotiable Conveyance, Assignment
and Assumption Agreement (CAA
Agreement). Bidders will be required to
submit a deposit with their bid.
Deposits are calculated based upon each
bidder’s aggregate bid price.
HUD will evaluate the bids submitted
and determine the successful bid or
bids, in terms of the best value to HUD,
in its sole and absolute discretion. If a
bidder is successful, the bidder’s
deposit will be non-refundable and will
be applied toward the purchase price.
Deposits will be returned to
unsuccessful bidders. Closings are
expected to take place on September 22,
2010 and October 27, 2010.
This notice provides a summary of
some of the essential terms of sale. The
CAA Agreement, which is included in
the BIP, contains additional terms and
details. To ensure a competitive bidding
process, the terms of the bidding
process and the CAA Agreement are not
subject to negotiation.
Bidder Eligibility
In order to bid in the sale, a
prospective bidder must complete,
execute and submit both a
Confidentiality Agreement and a
Qualification Statement acceptable to
HUD. After receiving the BIP, bidders
will also complete a Bid Terms
Acknowledgement Form which will
provide them access to HUD online
bidding site. The following individuals
and entities are ineligible to bid on any
of the Mortgage Loans included in SFLS
2010:
(1) Any employee of HUD, a member
of such employee’s household, or an
entity owned or controlled by any such
employee or member of such an
employee’s household;
(2) any individual or entity that is
debarred, suspended, or excluded from
doing business with HUD pursuant to
Title 24 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 24, and Title 25 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2424;
(3) any contractor, subcontractor and/
or consultant or advisor (including any
agent, employee, partner, director,
principal or affiliate of any of the
foregoing) who performed services for or
on behalf of HUD in connection with
SFLS 2010;
(4) any individual or entity that uses
the services, directly or indirectly, of
any person or entity ineligible under
subparagraphs 1 through 3 above to
assist in preparing any of its bids on the
Mortgage Loans;
(5) any individual or entity which
employs or uses the services of an
employee of HUD (other than in such
employee’s official capacity) who is
involved in SFLS 2010;
(6) any entity or individual that
serviced or held any Mortgage Loan at
any time during the 2-year period prior
to the bid is ineligible to bid on such
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Due Diligence Review
The BIP describes how bidders may
access the due diligence materials
remotely via a high-speed internet
connection.
Mortgage Loan Sale Policy
HUD reserves the right to remove
Mortgage Loans from SFLS 2010 at any
time prior to the Award Date. HUD also
reserves the right to reject any and all
bids, in whole or in part, without
prejudice to HUD’s right to include any
Mortgage Loans in a later sale. Mortgage
Loans will not be withdrawn after the
Award Date except as is specifically
provided in the CAA Agreement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Sep 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
Mortgage Loan Sale Procedure
HUD selected a competitive sale as
the method to sell the Mortgage Loans.
This method of sale optimizes HUD’s
return on the sale of these Mortgage
Loans, affords the greatest opportunity
for all qualified bidders to bid on the
Mortgage Loans, and provides the
quickest and most efficient vehicle for
HUD to dispose of the Mortgage Loans.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57053
Mortgage Loan or on the pool containing
such Mortgage Loan, and
(7) also ineligible to bid on any
Mortgage Loan are: (a) Any affiliate or
principal of any entity or individual
described in the preceding sentence
(subparagraph 6); (b) any employee or
subcontractor of such entity or
individual during that 2-year period; or
(c) any entity or individual that employs
or uses the services of any other entity
or individual described in this
subparagraph in preparing its bid on
such Mortgage Loan.
Freedom of Information Act Requests
HUD reserves the right, in its sole and
absolute discretion, to disclose
information regarding SFLS 2010,
including, but not limited to, the
identity of any successful bidder and its
bid price or bid percentage for any pool
of loans or individual loan, upon the
closing of the sale of all the Mortgage
Loans. Even if HUD elects not to
publicly disclose any information
relating to SFLS 2010, HUD will have
the right to disclose any information
that HUD is obligated to disclose
pursuant to the Freedom of Information
Act and all regulations promulgated
thereunder.
Scope of Notice
This notice applies to SFLS 2010 and
does not establish HUD’s policy for the
sale of other mortgage loans.
Dated: September 10, 2010.
David H. Stevens,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2010–23182 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2010–N146;
1265–0000–10137 S3]
Camas National Wildlife Refuge,
Jefferson County, ID; Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan (CCP) for Camas National Wildlife
Refuge (refuge) in Hamer, ID. We will
also prepare an environmental
assessment (EA) to evaluate the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
57054
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
Background
dependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife
Refuge System was established for
specific purposes. We use these
purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the
management of goals and objectives for
each refuge within the National Wildlife
Refuge System mission, and to
determine how the public can use each
refuge. The planning process is a way
for us and the public to evaluate
management goals and objectives that
will insure the best possible approach to
wildlife, plant, and habitat
conservation, while providing for
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System.
Our CCP process provides
participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies;
organizations; and the public. At this
time we encourage input in the form of
issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions
for the future management of Camas
Refuge.
We will conduct the environmental
review of this project and develop an
EA in accordance with the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); NEPA regulations
(40 CFR parts 1500–1508); other
appropriate Federal laws and
regulations; and our policies and
procedures for compliance with those
laws and regulations.
The CCP Process
Camas National Wildlife Refuge
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
The Camas Refuge was established by
President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1937
for the purpose of serving as a refuge
and breeding ground for migratory birds
and other wildlife. The refuge is located
36 miles north of Idaho Falls, near the
community of Hamer, Idaho. The refuge
lies in the upper Snake River plain at
approximately 4,800 feet in elevation.
The refuge was historically comprised
of a diverse mosaic of wetland and wet
meadow habitats, surrounded by an
expansive sea of sagebrush, termed the
‘‘high desert.’’ The wetlands and wet
meadows were once fed by surface
water from the perennial flow of Camas
Creek, and natural artesian wells which
discharged groundwater and continually
potential effects of various CCP
alternatives. We are providing this
notice in compliance with our CCP
policy to advise the public, Federal and
State agencies, and Tribes of our
intentions, and to obtain suggestions
and information on the scope of issues
to consider during the CCP planning
process.
To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by October
18, 2010. We will announce
opportunities for public input in local
news media throughout the CCP
planning process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: brian_wehausen@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Camas CCP/EA’’ in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Brian Wehausen, (208)
662–5525.
U.S. Mail: Camas National Wildlife
Refuge, 2150 East 2350 North, Hamer,
ID 83425.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off
comments during regular business hours
(8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) at 370 Webster St.,
Montpelier, ID 83254.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Wehausen, (208) 662–5423.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Introduction
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
With this notice, we initiate our
process for developing a CCP for the
Camas Refuge. This notice complies
with our CCP policy to (1) Advise other
Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and
the public of our intention to conduct
detailed planning on this refuge and (2)
obtain suggestions and information on
the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Sep 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
flooded the wetlands during the drier
summer and fall months.
The upper Snake River climate and
soils are favorable to agricultural uses,
principally ranching and farming. In the
late 1800s, large livestock and ranching
operations were established in the area.
The grazing lands were later divided
into smaller units, and crops were
cultivated for livestock feed. Agriculture
further developed in the area to support
the thousands of people working in
mines. By the time mining diminished,
railroads had begun connecting farmers
and ranchers to markets far beyond rural
southeast Idaho.
About half of the refuge’s 10,578 acres
are lakes, ponds, and marshlands, with
the remainder consisting of grass/
sagebrush uplands and meadows. There
are 292 known species of wildlife that
utilize the refuge during various periods
of the year. Approximately 100 species
of migratory birds nest at the refuge, and
it is especially important to migrating
land birds. A large number of songbirds
use the refuge’s cottonwood groves,
which are also a significant winter roost
site for bald eagles. Greater sandhill
cranes gather on the refuge prior to fall
migration. Sage grouse use the refuge
during brood rearing. During migration,
which peaks during March and April,
and again in October, up to 50,000
ducks, 3,000 geese, and several hundred
tundra and trumpeter swans may be
present on the refuge. The refuge also
hosts elk, white-tailed deer, mule deer,
pronghorn, and moose.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns,
and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary
issues, concerns, and opportunities that
we may address in the CCP. We have
briefly summarized the issues below.
During public scoping, we may identify
additional issues.
• Are the refuge’s water quantity
management and groundwater pumping
capabilities adequate for maintaining
nesting and migratory waterbird
habitats?
• Are we protecting the refuge’s water
rights adequately, and how can we
improve water quality for fish and
wildlife?
• What actions should we take to
minimize disturbance to waterbirds
nesting and migrating on the refuge, as
well as other wildlife?
• How the refuge can meet increasing
demands for recreational opportunities
and conduct quality visitor services
programs in a manner that protects
wildlife from disturbances?
• What is the refuge’s role in
managing the established nonnative
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
cottonwood gallery forest for migratory
landbirds?
• What are our options for preventing
the introduction and dispersal of
invasive plants and animals?
• What is the refuge’s role in
supporting native fish and restoring
riparian habitat in Camas Creek?
• How can we maintain, manage, and
restore the refuge’s sagebrush, wet
meadow, and upland habitats to support
the long-term viability of native wildlife
populations, and maximize habitat
values for key wildlife species?
• How can the refuge adaptively
manage habitat in response to climate
change issues?
• How can we protect the refuge’s
cultural and historical resources?
• What is the most appropriate refuge
land management strategy for providing
contiguous and quality habitats for focal
wildlife resources?
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010–23243 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R6–ES–2008–N188; 60120–1113–
0000; C2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Revised Recovery
Plan for Utah Prairie Dog
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) announces the
availability of a draft revised recovery
plan for the Utah prairie dog (Cynomys
parvidens). This species is federally
listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The Service solicits
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
review and comment from the public on
this draft revised plan.
DATES: Comments on the draft revised
recovery plan must be received on or
before November 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised
recovery plan are available by request
from the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton
Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, UT
84119; telephone 801–975–3330.
Submit comments on the draft recovery
plan to the Field Supervisor at this same
address. An electronic copy of the draft
recovery plan is available at https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/species/
recovery-plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Field Supervisor, at the above address,
or telephone 801–975–3330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring an endangered or
threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, selfsustaining member of its ecosystem is a
primary goal of the Service’s
endangered species program. To help
guide the recovery effort, the Service
prepares recovery plans for the federally
listed species native to the United States
where a plan will promote the
conservation of the species. Recovery
plans describe site-specific actions
necessary for the conservation of the
species, establish objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result
in a determination that the species no
longer needs the protection of the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and provide
estimates of the time and cost for
implementing the needed recovery
measures.
The Act requires recovery plans for
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Section 4(f) of the
Act, as amended in 1988, requires that
public notice and opportunity for public
review and comment be provided
during recovery plan development. The
Service will consider all information
received during a public comment
period when preparing each new or
revised recovery plan for approval. The
Service and other Federal agencies also
will take these comments into
consideration in the course of
implementing approved recovery plans.
It is our policy to request peer review
of recovery plans. We will summarize
and respond to the issues raised by the
public and peer reviewers in an
appendix to the approved recovery plan.
The Utah prairie dog (Cynomys
parvidens), found only in southwestern
and central Utah, was listed as an
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57055
endangered species on June 4, 1973 (38
FR 14678). At the time of listing, the
species was threatened by habitat
destruction and modification,
overexploitation, disease, and
predation. Subsequently, Utah prairie
dog populations increased significantly
in portions of their range, and on May
29, 1984 (49 FR 22330), the species was
reclassified as threatened with a special
rule to allow regulated take of the
species. This special rule was amended
on June 14, 1991 (56 FR 27438), to
increase the amount of regulated take
allowed throughout the species’ range.
Recent Utah prairie dog population
trends appear to be relatively stable,
although the species remains vulnerable
to several serious threats. These include
habitat loss, plague, changing climatic
conditions, unauthorized take, and
disturbance from recreational and
economic land uses.
The recovery of Utah prairie dogs will
rely on effective conservation responses
to the issues facing the species, which
remain varied and complex. These
issues include plague, urban expansion,
grazing, cultivated agriculture,
vegetative community changes, invasive
plants, off-highway vehicle and
recreation uses, climate change, energy
resource exploration and development,
fire management, poaching, and
predation. Strategically, these issues can
be reduced to two overriding concerns:
loss of habitat and plague. The recovery
strategy for the Utah prairie dog focuses
on the need to address colony loss and
disease through a program that
encompasses threats abatement,
population management, research, and
monitoring. We emphasize conserving
extant colonies, many of which occur on
non-Federal lands; establishing
additional colonies on Federal and nonFederal lands via habitat improvement
or translocations; controlling the
transmission of plague; and monitoring
habitat conditions.
Request for Public Comments
The Service solicits public comments
on the draft recovery plan. All
comments received by the date specified
in DATES will be considered prior to
approval of the plan. Written comments
and materials regarding the plan should
be addressed to the Field Supervisor
(see ADDRESSES section). Comments and
materials received will be available, by
appointment, for public inspection
during normal business hours at the
above address.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533(f).
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57053-57055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23243]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2010-N146; 1265-0000-10137 S3]
Camas National Wildlife Refuge, Jefferson County, ID;
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for Camas National
Wildlife Refuge (refuge) in Hamer, ID. We will also prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) to evaluate the
[[Page 57054]]
potential effects of various CCP alternatives. We are providing this
notice in compliance with our CCP policy to advise the public, Federal
and State agencies, and Tribes of our intentions, and to obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider during
the CCP planning process.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
October 18, 2010. We will announce opportunities for public input in
local news media throughout the CCP planning process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: brian_wehausen@fws.gov. Include ``Camas CCP/EA'' in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Brian Wehausen, (208) 662-5525.
U.S. Mail: Camas National Wildlife Refuge, 2150 East 2350 North,
Hamer, ID 83425.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments during regular
business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) at 370 Webster St., Montpelier, ID
83254.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Wehausen, (208) 662-5423.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate our process for developing a CCP for
the Camas Refuge. This notice complies with our CCP policy to (1)
Advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our
intention to conduct detailed planning on this refuge and (2) obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System was established
for specific purposes. We use these purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the management of goals and objectives for
each refuge within the National Wildlife Refuge System mission, and to
determine how the public can use each refuge. The planning process is a
way for us and the public to evaluate management goals and objectives
that will insure the best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and
habitat conservation, while providing for wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities that are compatible with each refuge's
establishing purposes and the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public.
At this time we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns, ideas,
and suggestions for the future management of Camas Refuge.
We will conduct the environmental review of this project and
develop an EA in accordance with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.); NEPA regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); other appropriate
Federal laws and regulations; and our policies and procedures for
compliance with those laws and regulations.
Camas National Wildlife Refuge
The Camas Refuge was established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt
in 1937 for the purpose of serving as a refuge and breeding ground for
migratory birds and other wildlife. The refuge is located 36 miles
north of Idaho Falls, near the community of Hamer, Idaho. The refuge
lies in the upper Snake River plain at approximately 4,800 feet in
elevation.
The refuge was historically comprised of a diverse mosaic of
wetland and wet meadow habitats, surrounded by an expansive sea of
sagebrush, termed the ``high desert.'' The wetlands and wet meadows
were once fed by surface water from the perennial flow of Camas Creek,
and natural artesian wells which discharged groundwater and continually
flooded the wetlands during the drier summer and fall months.
The upper Snake River climate and soils are favorable to
agricultural uses, principally ranching and farming. In the late 1800s,
large livestock and ranching operations were established in the area.
The grazing lands were later divided into smaller units, and crops were
cultivated for livestock feed. Agriculture further developed in the
area to support the thousands of people working in mines. By the time
mining diminished, railroads had begun connecting farmers and ranchers
to markets far beyond rural southeast Idaho.
About half of the refuge's 10,578 acres are lakes, ponds, and
marshlands, with the remainder consisting of grass/sagebrush uplands
and meadows. There are 292 known species of wildlife that utilize the
refuge during various periods of the year. Approximately 100 species of
migratory birds nest at the refuge, and it is especially important to
migrating land birds. A large number of songbirds use the refuge's
cottonwood groves, which are also a significant winter roost site for
bald eagles. Greater sandhill cranes gather on the refuge prior to fall
migration. Sage grouse use the refuge during brood rearing. During
migration, which peaks during March and April, and again in October, up
to 50,000 ducks, 3,000 geese, and several hundred tundra and trumpeter
swans may be present on the refuge. The refuge also hosts elk, white-
tailed deer, mule deer, pronghorn, and moose.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities
that we may address in the CCP. We have briefly summarized the issues
below. During public scoping, we may identify additional issues.
Are the refuge's water quantity management and groundwater
pumping capabilities adequate for maintaining nesting and migratory
waterbird habitats?
Are we protecting the refuge's water rights adequately,
and how can we improve water quality for fish and wildlife?
What actions should we take to minimize disturbance to
waterbirds nesting and migrating on the refuge, as well as other
wildlife?
How the refuge can meet increasing demands for
recreational opportunities and conduct quality visitor services
programs in a manner that protects wildlife from disturbances?
What is the refuge's role in managing the established
nonnative
[[Page 57055]]
cottonwood gallery forest for migratory landbirds?
What are our options for preventing the introduction and
dispersal of invasive plants and animals?
What is the refuge's role in supporting native fish and
restoring riparian habitat in Camas Creek?
How can we maintain, manage, and restore the refuge's
sagebrush, wet meadow, and upland habitats to support the long-term
viability of native wildlife populations, and maximize habitat values
for key wildlife species?
How can the refuge adaptively manage habitat in response
to climate change issues?
How can we protect the refuge's cultural and historical
resources?
What is the most appropriate refuge land management
strategy for providing contiguous and quality habitats for focal
wildlife resources?
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010-23243 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P