Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Utah Prairie Dog, 57055-57056 [2010-23234]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
cottonwood gallery forest for migratory
landbirds?
• What are our options for preventing
the introduction and dispersal of
invasive plants and animals?
• What is the refuge’s role in
supporting native fish and restoring
riparian habitat in Camas Creek?
• How can we maintain, manage, and
restore the refuge’s sagebrush, wet
meadow, and upland habitats to support
the long-term viability of native wildlife
populations, and maximize habitat
values for key wildlife species?
• How can the refuge adaptively
manage habitat in response to climate
change issues?
• How can we protect the refuge’s
cultural and historical resources?
• What is the most appropriate refuge
land management strategy for providing
contiguous and quality habitats for focal
wildlife resources?
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010–23243 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R6–ES–2008–N188; 60120–1113–
0000; C2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Revised Recovery
Plan for Utah Prairie Dog
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) announces the
availability of a draft revised recovery
plan for the Utah prairie dog (Cynomys
parvidens). This species is federally
listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The Service solicits
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
review and comment from the public on
this draft revised plan.
DATES: Comments on the draft revised
recovery plan must be received on or
before November 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised
recovery plan are available by request
from the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton
Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, UT
84119; telephone 801–975–3330.
Submit comments on the draft recovery
plan to the Field Supervisor at this same
address. An electronic copy of the draft
recovery plan is available at https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/species/
recovery-plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Field Supervisor, at the above address,
or telephone 801–975–3330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring an endangered or
threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, selfsustaining member of its ecosystem is a
primary goal of the Service’s
endangered species program. To help
guide the recovery effort, the Service
prepares recovery plans for the federally
listed species native to the United States
where a plan will promote the
conservation of the species. Recovery
plans describe site-specific actions
necessary for the conservation of the
species, establish objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result
in a determination that the species no
longer needs the protection of the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and provide
estimates of the time and cost for
implementing the needed recovery
measures.
The Act requires recovery plans for
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Section 4(f) of the
Act, as amended in 1988, requires that
public notice and opportunity for public
review and comment be provided
during recovery plan development. The
Service will consider all information
received during a public comment
period when preparing each new or
revised recovery plan for approval. The
Service and other Federal agencies also
will take these comments into
consideration in the course of
implementing approved recovery plans.
It is our policy to request peer review
of recovery plans. We will summarize
and respond to the issues raised by the
public and peer reviewers in an
appendix to the approved recovery plan.
The Utah prairie dog (Cynomys
parvidens), found only in southwestern
and central Utah, was listed as an
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57055
endangered species on June 4, 1973 (38
FR 14678). At the time of listing, the
species was threatened by habitat
destruction and modification,
overexploitation, disease, and
predation. Subsequently, Utah prairie
dog populations increased significantly
in portions of their range, and on May
29, 1984 (49 FR 22330), the species was
reclassified as threatened with a special
rule to allow regulated take of the
species. This special rule was amended
on June 14, 1991 (56 FR 27438), to
increase the amount of regulated take
allowed throughout the species’ range.
Recent Utah prairie dog population
trends appear to be relatively stable,
although the species remains vulnerable
to several serious threats. These include
habitat loss, plague, changing climatic
conditions, unauthorized take, and
disturbance from recreational and
economic land uses.
The recovery of Utah prairie dogs will
rely on effective conservation responses
to the issues facing the species, which
remain varied and complex. These
issues include plague, urban expansion,
grazing, cultivated agriculture,
vegetative community changes, invasive
plants, off-highway vehicle and
recreation uses, climate change, energy
resource exploration and development,
fire management, poaching, and
predation. Strategically, these issues can
be reduced to two overriding concerns:
loss of habitat and plague. The recovery
strategy for the Utah prairie dog focuses
on the need to address colony loss and
disease through a program that
encompasses threats abatement,
population management, research, and
monitoring. We emphasize conserving
extant colonies, many of which occur on
non-Federal lands; establishing
additional colonies on Federal and nonFederal lands via habitat improvement
or translocations; controlling the
transmission of plague; and monitoring
habitat conditions.
Request for Public Comments
The Service solicits public comments
on the draft recovery plan. All
comments received by the date specified
in DATES will be considered prior to
approval of the plan. Written comments
and materials regarding the plan should
be addressed to the Field Supervisor
(see ADDRESSES section). Comments and
materials received will be available, by
appointment, for public inspection
during normal business hours at the
above address.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533(f).
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
57056
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
Dated: August 18, 2010.
Hugh Morrison,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–23234 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWYP07000; L16100000.DU0000]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Buffalo Resource Management Plan
Amendment for the Fortification Creek
Planning Area and Environmental
Assessment, Wyoming
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft
Resource Management Plan Amendment
and Environmental Assessment (RMPA/
EA) for the Buffalo Field Office (BFO)
and by this notice is announcing the
opening of the comment period. The
RMPA/EA will amend the 1985 Buffalo
Resource Management Plan. The BLM
also announces the availability of
information regarding a proposed Area
of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC) considered in the Draft RMPA/
EA.
DATES: The BLM must receive written
comments on the Draft RMPA/EA and
on the proposed ACEC information
within 60 days following the date that
this Notice of Availability appears in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the Draft RMPA/EA by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/wy/
st/en/info/NEPA/bfodocs/
fortification_creek.html.
• E-mail: Fort_Crk_WYMail@blm.gov.
• Fax: (307) 684–1122.
• Mail: Buffalo RMP Amendment/
Fortification Creek EA, BLM Buffalo
Field Office, 1425 Fort Street, Buffalo,
Wyoming 82834.
Copies of the Draft RMPA/EA are
available in the Buffalo Field Office at
the above address and at the following
location:
• Bureau of Land Management,
Wyoming State Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming
82003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact Thomas
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Sep 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
Bills, Buffalo RMPA Team Leader,
telephone at 307–684–1133; mailing
address at BLM Buffalo Field Office,
1425 Fort Street, Buffalo, Wyoming
82834; e-mail at tom_bills@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Fortification Creek Planning Area
(FCPA) is described as requiring
‘‘special management’’ in the Powder
River Basin Oil and Gas Project
Environmental Impact Statement (PRB
EIS). The FCPA also contains an
isolated elk herd, a Wilderness Study
Area (WSA) and a citizen-proposed
ACEC. The FCPA is 100,655 acres in
size and located in the center of the
Powder River Basin in parts of
Campbell, Johnson, and Sheridan
Counties, Wyoming.
An RMP amendment has been
initiated to simplify, consolidate and
unify overlapping planning decisions in
the FCPA while ensuring the viability of
the existing elk herd and maintaining
other management activities in the
planning area.
The Draft RMPA/EA documents the
direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts of three
alternatives for management of BLMadministered public lands and mineral
resources within the Fortification Creek
Area of the BFO. The alternatives
incorporate best management practices
for oil and gas development and other
measures necessary to address impacts
to transportation, public safety, cultural
resources, recreational opportunities,
wildlife, threatened and endangered
species, visual resources, air quality,
wilderness characteristics, and other
relevant issues. The following
descriptions of alternatives considered
in the Draft RMPA/EA have been
included to provide context for
reviewers. Three alternatives are
analyzed in detail:
Alternative 1 (No Action Alternative):
Continues the existing management
direction in conformance with the
current RMP and would not designate
an ACEC in the FCPA;
Alternative 2: Amends the existing
RMP to allow overhead power lines on
BLM surface within pre-defined
corridors, applies elk security habitat
standards as recommended by the
Wyoming Game and Fish Department
(WGFD), prescribes acceptable
mitigation measures, and would
designate an ACEC based on citizen
proposed boundaries (33,757 acres;
primarily public surface); and
Alternative 3 (Agency Preferred
Alternative): Amends the existing RMP
by allowing overhead power lines along
roads on BLM surface, applies elk
security habitat standards developed
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
jointly by the BLM and WGFD,
establishes standards for performance
based mitigation, and does not designate
any area as an ACEC.
There are no ACECs in the existing
BFO land use plan. As proposed in the
Draft RMPA/EA, there is potential for
designation of a Fortification Creek
ACEC. Values of concern include steep
slopes, erosive soils, elk habitat, cultural
resources, and visual resources.
When commenting, please include
reference to either the page or section in
the Draft RMPA/EA to which the
comment applies. To facilitate analysis
of comments and information
submitted, the BLM encourages those
individuals submitting comments to
submit them in electronic format.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and e-il addresses of
respondents will be available for public
review and disclosure at the above
address during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information–may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Donald A. Simpson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–23330 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2010–N150; 50133–1265–
CHNP–S3]
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge
and Wallops Island National Wildlife
Refuge, Accomack County, VA;
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; announcement
of public scoping and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS), are gathering
information to prepare a comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and associated
environmental impact statement (EIS)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57055-57056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23234]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R6-ES-2008-N188; 60120-1113-0000; C2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Revised
Recovery Plan for Utah Prairie Dog
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the
availability of a draft revised recovery plan for the Utah prairie dog
(Cynomys parvidens). This species is federally listed as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The Service
solicits review and comment from the public on this draft revised plan.
DATES: Comments on the draft revised recovery plan must be received on
or before November 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised recovery plan are available by
request from the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
2369 West Orton Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, UT 84119; telephone
801-975-3330. Submit comments on the draft recovery plan to the Field
Supervisor at this same address. An electronic copy of the draft
recovery plan is available at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Field Supervisor, at the above
address, or telephone 801-975-3330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring an endangered or threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, self-sustaining member of its ecosystem is
a primary goal of the Service's endangered species program. To help
guide the recovery effort, the Service prepares recovery plans for the
federally listed species native to the United States where a plan will
promote the conservation of the species. Recovery plans describe site-
specific actions necessary for the conservation of the species,
establish objective, measurable criteria which, when met, would result
in a determination that the species no longer needs the protection of
the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and provide estimates of the time and
cost for implementing the needed recovery measures.
The Act requires recovery plans for listed species unless such a
plan would not promote the conservation of a particular species.
Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in 1988, requires that public
notice and opportunity for public review and comment be provided during
recovery plan development. The Service will consider all information
received during a public comment period when preparing each new or
revised recovery plan for approval. The Service and other Federal
agencies also will take these comments into consideration in the course
of implementing approved recovery plans. It is our policy to request
peer review of recovery plans. We will summarize and respond to the
issues raised by the public and peer reviewers in an appendix to the
approved recovery plan.
The Utah prairie dog (Cynomys parvidens), found only in
southwestern and central Utah, was listed as an endangered species on
June 4, 1973 (38 FR 14678). At the time of listing, the species was
threatened by habitat destruction and modification, overexploitation,
disease, and predation. Subsequently, Utah prairie dog populations
increased significantly in portions of their range, and on May 29, 1984
(49 FR 22330), the species was reclassified as threatened with a
special rule to allow regulated take of the species. This special rule
was amended on June 14, 1991 (56 FR 27438), to increase the amount of
regulated take allowed throughout the species' range. Recent Utah
prairie dog population trends appear to be relatively stable, although
the species remains vulnerable to several serious threats. These
include habitat loss, plague, changing climatic conditions,
unauthorized take, and disturbance from recreational and economic land
uses.
The recovery of Utah prairie dogs will rely on effective
conservation responses to the issues facing the species, which remain
varied and complex. These issues include plague, urban expansion,
grazing, cultivated agriculture, vegetative community changes, invasive
plants, off-highway vehicle and recreation uses, climate change, energy
resource exploration and development, fire management, poaching, and
predation. Strategically, these issues can be reduced to two overriding
concerns: loss of habitat and plague. The recovery strategy for the
Utah prairie dog focuses on the need to address colony loss and disease
through a program that encompasses threats abatement, population
management, research, and monitoring. We emphasize conserving extant
colonies, many of which occur on non-Federal lands; establishing
additional colonies on Federal and non-Federal lands via habitat
improvement or translocations; controlling the transmission of plague;
and monitoring habitat conditions.
Request for Public Comments
The Service solicits public comments on the draft recovery plan.
All comments received by the date specified in DATES will be considered
prior to approval of the plan. Written comments and materials regarding
the plan should be addressed to the Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES
section). Comments and materials received will be available, by
appointment, for public inspection during normal business hours at the
above address.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
[[Page 57056]]
Dated: August 18, 2010.
Hugh Morrison,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-23234 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P