Safety Zone; San Diego Harbor Shark Fest Swim; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 55975-55977 [2010-23009]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0462]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0786 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0786 Safety Zone; Illnois River,
Mile 000.5 to 001.5.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all waters of the Illinois
River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5 extending the
entire width of the waterway.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. CDT on
September 18, 2010.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
will be enforced from 9 p.m. until 10
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–23007 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
■
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Dated: August 23, 2010.
S.L. Hudson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
p.m. CDT on September 18, 2010. The
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River will inform the public through
broadcast notice to mariners of all safety
zone changes and enforcement periods.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative. The Captain
of the Port Upper Mississippi River
representative may be contacted at 314–
269–2332.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or their designated representative.
Designated Captain of the Port
representatives include United States
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast
Guard.
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Harbor Shark
Fest Swim; San Diego Bay, San Diego,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
upon the navigable waters of the San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of
a bay swim in San Diego Harbor. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
designated representative.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55975
This rule is effective from 8:30
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0462 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0462 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Corey
McDonald, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego,
Coast Guard; telephone 619–278–7262,
e-mail Corey.R.McDonald@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
publishing an NPRM is impractical as
the Coast Guard did not receive
notification of the logistical details of
the San Diego Bay swim in sufficient
time to issue an NPRM without delaying
this rulemaking. A delay or cancellation
of the event in order to allow for a
notice and comment period is contrary
to the public interest because it is
necessary to protect participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other
users of the waterway during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure public safety.
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
55976
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Basis and Purpose
Enviro-Sports Production is
sponsoring the San Diego Harbor Shark
Fest Swim, consisting of 600 swimmers
swimming a predetermined course. The
sponsor will provide 26 safety vessels
for this event. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other
users of the waterway.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone that will be
enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on
September 19, 2010. This safety zone
will encompass the navigable waters of
the San Diego Bay bounded by the
following coordinates:
32°42.17′ N, 117°09.83′ W;
32°41.66′ N, 117°09.88′ W;
along the shore line to 32°41.29′ N,
117°09.77′ W;
32°41.50′ N, 117°09.73′ W;
32°42.05′ N, 117°09.68′ W;
along the shore line to 32°42.17′ N,
117°09.83′ W.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure non-authorized personnel and
vessels remain safe by keeping clear of
the hazardous area during the training
activities. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times.
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the portion of the San Diego Bay from
8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19,
2010.
This temporary safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule will
be enforced for only 120 minutes early
in the day when vessel traffic is low.
Vessel traffic can pass safely around the
zone. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice
to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine
channel 16 VHF before the temporary
safety zone is enforced.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Small Entities
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–332 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–332 Safety Zone; San Diego
Harbor Shark Fest Swim; San Diego Bay,
San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All the navigable waters of
the San Diego Bay bounded by the
following coordinates:
32°42.17′ N, 117°09.83′ W;
32°41.66′ N, 117°09.88′ W;
along the shore line to 32°41.29′ N,
117°09.77′ W;
32°41.50′ N, 117°09.73′ W;
32°42.05′ N, 117°09.68′ W;
along the shore line to 32°42.17′ N,
117°09.83′ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on September 19, 2010. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port San Diego.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM
Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port San Diego or
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55977
Dated: August 11, 2010.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010–23009 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0666–201032; FRL–
9202–1]
Adequacy Status of the Knoxville, TN
1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan
Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for
Transportation Conformity Purposes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
AGENCY:
EPA is notifying the public
that it has found that the motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) contained
in the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision for the Knoxville, Tennessee
1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan
are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. This revision was
submitted on July 14, 2010, by the
Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC). The
Knoxville 1997 8-Hour ozone
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘the Knoxville Area’’) for which
MVEBs are established in today’s notice
is comprised of the entire counties of
Anderson, Blount, Jefferson, Knox,
Sevier, and Loudon as well as the
portion of Cocke County that falls
within the boundaries of the Great
Smoky Mountains National Park. On
March 2, 1999, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (DC Circuit) ruled that submitted
SIPs cannot be used for transportation
conformity determinations until EPA
has affirmatively found them adequate.
As a result of EPA’s finding, the
Knoxville Area must use the MVEBs for
future conformity determinations for the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS).
DATES: These MVEBs are effective
September 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Sheckler, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, Air
Planning Branch, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Ms.
Sheckler can also be reached by
telephone at (404) 562–9222, or via
electronic mail at
sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. The finding is
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55975-55977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23009]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0462]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Harbor Shark Fest Swim; San Diego Bay, San
Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone upon
the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of
a bay swim in San Diego Harbor. This temporary safety zone is necessary
to provide for the safety of the participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September
19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0462 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0462 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Corey McDonald, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone
619-278-7262, e-mail Corey.R.McDonald@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM is impractical as
the Coast Guard did not receive notification of the logistical details
of the San Diego Bay swim in sufficient time to issue an NPRM without
delaying this rulemaking. A delay or cancellation of the event in order
to allow for a notice and comment period is contrary to the public
interest because it is necessary to protect participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users of the waterway during the
event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is needed to
ensure public safety.
[[Page 55976]]
Basis and Purpose
Enviro-Sports Production is sponsoring the San Diego Harbor Shark
Fest Swim, consisting of 600 swimmers swimming a predetermined course.
The sponsor will provide 26 safety vessels for this event. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users of the
waterway.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone that will
be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19, 2010. This
safety zone will encompass the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay
bounded by the following coordinates:
32[deg]42.17[min] N, 117[deg]09.83[min] W;
32[deg]41.66[min] N, 117[deg]09.88[min] W;
along the shore line to 32[deg]41.29[min] N, 117[deg]09.77[min] W;
32[deg]41.50[min] N, 117[deg]09.73[min] W;
32[deg]42.05[min] N, 117[deg]09.68[min] W;
along the shore line to 32[deg]42.17[min] N, 117[deg]09.83[min] W.
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure non-authorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the hazardous
area during the training activities. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This determination is based on the size and location of the safety
zone. Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the
designated safety zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the portion of the San Diego Bay from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on September 19, 2010.
This temporary safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons. This rule will be enforced for only 120 minutes early in the
day when vessel traffic is low. Vessel traffic can pass safely around
the zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VHF
before the temporary safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
[[Page 55977]]
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-332 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-332 Safety Zone; San Diego Harbor Shark Fest Swim; San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All the
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay bounded by the following
coordinates:
32[deg]42.17[min] N, 117[deg]09.83[min] W;
32[deg]41.66[min] N, 117[deg]09.88[min] W;
along the shore line to 32[deg]41.29[min] N, 117[deg]09.77[min] W;
32[deg]41.50[min] N, 117[deg]09.73[min] W;
32[deg]42.05[min] N, 117[deg]09.68[min] W;
along the shore line to 32[deg]42.17[min] N, 117[deg]09.83[min] W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19, 2010. If the event concludes prior
to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port
San Diego.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port San Diego or designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or
local agencies.
Dated: August 11, 2010.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010-23009 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P