Safety Zone; Illinois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5, 55973-55975 [2010-23007]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 155
[USCG–1998–3417]
RIN 1625–AA19
Salvage and Marine Firefighting
Requirements; Vessel Response Plans
for Oil
Coast Guard, DHS.
Rule; information collection
approval; clarification.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On September 3, 2010, the
Coast Guard announced the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval of the information collection
associated with the vessel response plan
salvage and marine firefighting
requirements for tank vessels carrying
oil. That announcement indicated that
the collection of information
requirements would be enforced
beginning September 3, 2010. This
document clarifies that although OMB
has approved the information
collection, the compliance date for
updates to vessel response plans
required by the Salvage and Marine
Firefighting final rule remains February
22, 2011.
DATES: The collection of information
approved under OMB Control Number
1625–0066 became enforceable
beginning September 3, 2010. The
compliance date for updates to vessel
response plans required by the Salvage
and Marine Firefighting final rule
remains February 22, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this document
contact Lieutenant Commander Ryan
Allain at 202–372–1226 or
Ryan.D.Allain@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket
(USCG–1998–3417), call Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 31, 2008, the Coast Guard
published a final rule entitled ‘‘Salvage
and Marine Firefighting Requirements;
Vessel Response Plans for Oil’’ (73 FR
80618). The final rule amended the
vessel response plan salvage and marine
firefighting requirements for tank
vessels carrying oil. The final rule
included information collection
requirements affecting OMB Control
Number 1625–0066 that could not be
enforced without approval by OMB. In
the final rule the Coast Guard stated that
it would publish notice in the Federal
Register announcing OMB’s decision to
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
approve, modify, or disapprove the
collection.
On August 31, 2009, the Coast Guard
published another final rule concerning
vessel response plans, ‘‘Vessel and
Facility Response Plans for Oil: 2003
Removal Equipment Requirements and
Alternative Technology Revisions’’ (74
FR 45004). One of the effects of this rule
was to defer the compliance date for the
salvage and marine firefighting
requirements from June 1, 2010, to
February 22, 2011.
The information collection associated
with OMB Control Number 1625–0066
affects a variety of vessel response
plans, not just salvage and marine
firefighting requirements. On August 20,
2010, OMB approved the Coast Guard’s
requested revisions to OMB Control
Number 1625–0066, and on September
3, 2010, the Coast Guard published a
notice announcing this approval (75 FR
54026). OMB approval of this
information collection does not alter the
existing compliance date for vessel
response plan salvage and marine
firefighting requirements for tank
vessels carrying oil.
Dated: September 9, 2010.
Kathryn Sinniger,
Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2010–22932 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0786]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Illinois River, Mile 000.5
to 001.5
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Illinois River, Mile
000.5 to 001.5, extending the entire
width of the river. This safety zone is
needed to protect persons and vessels
from safety hazards associated with a
land based firework display occurring
on the Illinois River. Entry into this
zone will be prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m.
until 10 p.m. on September 18, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55973
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0786 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0786 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant (LT) Rob
McCaskey, Sector Upper Mississippi
River Response Department at telephone
314–269–2541, e-mail
Rob.E.McCaskey@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ The Coast Guard
finds that it would be impracticable to
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule
because the event would occur before
the rulemaking process could be
completed.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Publishing a NPRM and
delaying its effective date would be
impracticable because immediate action
is needed to protect vessels and
mariners from the safety hazards
associated with a land based fireworks
display.
Basis and Purpose
On September 18, 2010 the City of
Grafton will be conducting a land based
fireworks display at mile 001.0 on the
Illinois River. This event presents safety
hazards to the navigation of vessels
between mile 000.5 and mile 001.5,
extending the entire width of the river.
A safety zone around the launch site is
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
55974
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
necessary to protect spectators, vessels,
and other property from the hazards
associated with the fireworks. The
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River will inform the public of all safety
zone changes through broadcast notice
to mariners.
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: (1) This rule will
only be in effect for a limited period of
time; and (2) the local waterway users
will be notified via public Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone for all waters of the Illinois
River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5, extending the
entire width of the river. Entry into this
zone will be prohibited to all vessels
and persons except participants and
those persons and vessels specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Upper Mississippi River. This rule will
be effective from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
CDT on September 18, 2010. The
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River will inform the public through
broadcast notice to mariners of all safety
zone changes and enforcement periods.
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because of the very brief
duration of the effective period of the
zone. Furthermore, the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0462]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0786 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0786 Safety Zone; Illnois River,
Mile 000.5 to 001.5.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all waters of the Illinois
River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5 extending the
entire width of the waterway.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. CDT on
September 18, 2010.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
will be enforced from 9 p.m. until 10
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–23007 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
■
18:17 Sep 14, 2010
Dated: August 23, 2010.
S.L. Hudson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
p.m. CDT on September 18, 2010. The
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River will inform the public through
broadcast notice to mariners of all safety
zone changes and enforcement periods.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative. The Captain
of the Port Upper Mississippi River
representative may be contacted at 314–
269–2332.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or their designated representative.
Designated Captain of the Port
representatives include United States
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast
Guard.
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Harbor Shark
Fest Swim; San Diego Bay, San Diego,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
upon the navigable waters of the San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of
a bay swim in San Diego Harbor. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
designated representative.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55975
This rule is effective from 8:30
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0462 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0462 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Corey
McDonald, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego,
Coast Guard; telephone 619–278–7262,
e-mail Corey.R.McDonald@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
publishing an NPRM is impractical as
the Coast Guard did not receive
notification of the logistical details of
the San Diego Bay swim in sufficient
time to issue an NPRM without delaying
this rulemaking. A delay or cancellation
of the event in order to allow for a
notice and comment period is contrary
to the public interest because it is
necessary to protect participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other
users of the waterway during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure public safety.
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55973-55975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23007]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0786]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Illinois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Illinois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5, extending the
entire width of the river. This safety zone is needed to protect
persons and vessels from safety hazards associated with a land based
firework display occurring on the Illinois River. Entry into this zone
will be prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. on September
18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0786 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0786 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant (LT) Rob McCaskey, Sector
Upper Mississippi River Response Department at telephone 314-269-2541,
e-mail Rob.E.McCaskey@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' The Coast Guard finds that it would be impracticable to
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because the event would occur before the rulemaking process could
be completed.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM and delaying its
effective date would be impracticable because immediate action is
needed to protect vessels and mariners from the safety hazards
associated with a land based fireworks display.
Basis and Purpose
On September 18, 2010 the City of Grafton will be conducting a land
based fireworks display at mile 001.0 on the Illinois River. This event
presents safety hazards to the navigation of vessels between mile 000.5
and mile 001.5, extending the entire width of the river. A safety zone
around the launch site is
[[Page 55974]]
necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and other property from the
hazards associated with the fireworks. The Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River will inform the public of all safety zone changes
through broadcast notice to mariners.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for all waters of the
Illinois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5, extending the entire width of the
river. Entry into this zone will be prohibited to all vessels and
persons except participants and those persons and vessels specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River. This
rule will be effective from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. CDT on September 18,
2010. The Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River will inform the
public through broadcast notice to mariners of all safety zone changes
and enforcement periods.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because of the very brief duration of the effective period of the zone.
Furthermore, the local waterway users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will result in
minimum impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: (1) This rule will only be in
effect for a limited period of time; and (2) the local waterway users
will be notified via public Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are
[[Page 55975]]
technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0786 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0786 Safety Zone; Illnois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all waters of
the Illinois River, Mile 000.5 to 001.5 extending the entire width of
the waterway.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective from 9 p.m. until 10
p.m. CDT on September 18, 2010.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule will be enforced from 9 p.m.
until 10 p.m. CDT on September 18, 2010. The Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River will inform the public through broadcast notice to
mariners of all safety zone changes and enforcement periods.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River or a designated representative. The Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River representative may be contacted at 314-
269-2332.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or their designated
representative. Designated Captain of the Port representatives include
United States Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of
the U.S. Coast Guard.
Dated: August 23, 2010.
S.L. Hudson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2010-23007 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P