Enhancing Policies Relating to Partnerships, 55710-55711 [2010-22819]
Download as PDF
55710
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 200
RIN 0596–AC89
Enhancing Policies Relating to
Partnerships
Forest Service, USDA.
Advance notice of proposed rule
making; request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is
proposing to establish an internal
directive at Forest Service Handbook
(FSH) 1509.14 that would enhance
policies related to partnerships. We
invite public comment on assessing
what changes or additions are needed
relating to the Agency’s use of
partnership arrangements in carrying
out our mission. These comments will
be considered in developing the
proposed directive.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by November 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning this notice should be
addressed to Forest Service, USDA,
Attn: Director, National Partnership
Office, Joe Meade, Mailstop 1158, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC, 20250–1125.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail
to abloucks@fs.fed.us, or by the
electronic process available at Federal eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at 201 14th
Street, SW., Room 3NE, Washington, DC
20250. Visitors are encouraged to call
ahead 202–205–1055 to facilitate
entrance into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Bedell-Loucks, Deputy Director,
National Partnership Office, 202–205–
8336 or abloucks@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339,
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Background and Need for the Proposed
Directive
Strong partnerships are vital to the
Forest Service’s mission, and by
ensuring clear guidance on the use of
such arrangements, the Forest Service
will be better able to promote their use.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Sep 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Throughout its 100-year history, the
Forest Service has utilized partnership
arrangements with States, Tribes, nongovernmental organizations, and others
to help carry out the motto ‘‘Caring for
the Land and Serving People.’’ These
arrangements are used in a variety of
ways to support Forest Service programs
on Federal, State, Tribal and private
lands, including ecological restoration
and enhancement, interpretation and
educational services, enhancement of
recreation opportunities, and wildlife
habitat improvements. These programs
readily provide a spectrum of benefits to
the Forest Service, its partners, and the
public and may include various
instruments to formalize relationships,
including grants, contracts or ‘‘mutual
benefit’’ agreements.
A number of statutory authorities
govern how and when the Forest
Service may work cooperatively with
partners, such as the Cooperative Funds
Act, Cooperative Funds and Deposits
Act, Cooperative Forestry Assistance
Act, Granger-Thye Act, Federal Grants
and Cooperative Agreements Act, and
Public Law 105–277, Section 323 as
amended by Public Law 111–11, Section
3001, Watershed Restoration and
Enhancement Agreements. (For more
background on the Forest Service’s use
of partnership arrangements, readers are
referred to the Partnership Guide,
https://
www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/
resources/partnership-guide/
Partnership-Guide.pdf).
Establishing partnerships and
utilizing them to their greatest potential
has not always been a simple matter for
the Forest Service and its partners.
Challenges have resulted, in part, from
the multiplicity of partnership
authorities, varying interpretation of
these authorities, and time-consuming
processes for consummating partnership
agreements. To address such challenges,
the Forest Service has taken a number
of steps in recent years, including
creating an internal task force, to
identify barriers to partnership
utilization, establishing the National
Partnership Office, and developing
various legislative proposals.
In 2007, the Forest Service embarked
on an initiative to institute needed
modifications to Agency policy
intended to reduce barriers to
partnership arrangements. An essential
part of this initiative was the review of
a number of policy issues raised over
the years by those inside and outside
the Forest Service that impede effective
use of partnerships. Based on that
review, these issues fall into several
broad categories: Administrative
processes; interpretation of legal
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
authorities; accountability and
reporting; human resources and ethics;
and funding.
Public Input Requested On Policy
Needs
The Forest Service is requesting
public input with respect to Agency
policy. Our intent with the issuance of
this notice is to consider such input
and, as appropriate, incorporate it in
developing this policy. Certain
suggestions, whether due to legislative
or other limitations, may not be
implemented through Agency policy,
and we wish for the public to
understand that as well.
The Forest Service is especially
interested in receiving input to the
following questions:
1. Purposes served by partnership
arrangements: What should be the
purpose(s) of partnership arrangements
between the Forest Service and State,
Tribal, non-governmental, or other
organizations or individuals? Where can
or should partnerships have the greatest
impact in the future, and toward what
ends?
2. Essential characteristics of
partnerships: When the Forest Service
and a partner work together, what are
the essential characteristics that are
needed in that relationship to lead to a
successful outcome? In what ways does
Agency guidance regarding the essential
characteristics of the partnership
relationship need clarification?
3. Reaching new partners: As the
Nation’s demographics change, the
people served by the Forest Service are
becoming increasingly diverse. The
Agency wants to reflect this diversity in
its partnership activities. We are
interested in hearing from the public
about: (a) Which potential partners are
under-represented and under-served; (b)
what kinds of work are these
individuals or organizations involved
in; (c) how engaging these partners will
be beneficial; and (d) how the Forest
Service can better access and
communicate with under-represented
and under-served groups.
4. Partner recognition and
sponsorship: Increasingly, nongovernmental organizations and
individuals are expressing interest in
working with the Forest Service to
improve the condition of our
environment, including our Nation’s
forests. The Forest Service is able to
work with many of these organizations
directly, as well as indirectly through
established non-profits (for example, the
National Forest Foundation and others).
As a Federal agency, there are
limitations on how we work with and
recognize particular partners (for
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules
example, signage, plaques, media and
communication). What are the
appropriate ways the Forest Service
should recognize our partners, both
non-profit and for-profit?
Conclusion
The Forest Service is considering how
best to proceed with policy
development relating to partnership
arrangements. Public input relating to
the questions listed above will be
helpful in developing the Agency’s
policy.
Dated: September 8, 2010.
Thomas L. Tidwell,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–22819 Filed 9–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 52, 72, 78, and 97
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0491; FRL–9201–6]
RIN 2060–AP50
Federal Implementation Plans To
Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine
Particulate Matter and Ozone;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; correcting
amendments.
AGENCY:
The preamble to the proposed
Transport Rule contains minor,
technical errors that EPA is correcting in
this action. In the portion of the
preamble discussing in detail the
proposed trading programs, EPA states
clearly that it is proposing provisions
that allow units to opt into these trading
programs. Moreover, the proposed rule
text for the Transport Rule includes
detailed opt-in provisions for each
proposed trading program. However,
two sentences in other portions of the
Transport Rule preamble erroneously
state that the proposed trading programs
do not allow units to opt in. In this
proposed rule, EPA is correcting these
technical errors.
DATES: Effective Date: These correcting
amendments are effective on September
14, 2010.
Comments: The deadline for receipt of
comments on the proposed Transport
Rule (including the corrections
proposed by this action) continues to be
October 1, 2010, the same date set forth
in the proposed Transport Rule (75 FR
45210, August 2, 2010) as the deadline
for receipt of comments.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Sep 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Public Hearing: As explained in the
proposed Transport Rule, three public
hearings were scheduled to be held
before the end of the comment period.
The dates, times and locations were
announced separately. Please refer to
the notice of public hearings (75 FR
45075, August 2, 2010) on the proposed
Transport Rule for additional
information on the comment period and
the public hearings.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for the proposed Transport Rule,
including this action, under Docket ID
EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0491. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center EPA/DC, EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the EPA Docket Center is
(202) 566–1742. This action and other
rulemaking actions related to the
proposed Transport Rule are also
available at EPA’s Air Transport Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/airtransport.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Tim Smith, Air Quality Policy Division,
Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (C539–04), Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541–4718; fax number: (919) 541–
0824; e-mail address:
smith.tim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The proposed Transport Rule contains
minor, technical errors in two sentences
in the preamble. In the portion of the
preamble (i.e., section V.D.4.a (75 FR
45307–9)) that discusses in detail the
proposed Transport Rule trading
programs, EPA states clearly that it is
proposing provisions that allow units to
opt into the proposed trading programs.
Moreover, the proposed rule text in the
proposed Transport Rule (75 FR 45389–
92, 45414–17, 45438–41, and 45462–65)
includes detailed opt-in provisions for
each of these trading programs.
However, subsequent portions (i.e.,
sections V.F.3 (75 FR 45338) and V.G.1
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55711
(75 FR 45340)) of the preamble compare
the proposed rule with the Clean Air
Interstate Rule and the Acid Rain
Program and mention in a summary way
the treatment of opt-in units in the
proposed rule. Two sentences in those
portions of the preamble erroneously
state that the proposal does not allow
units to opt in.
EPA believes that the proposed
Transport Rule, as written, makes it
clear that the Agency is proposing to
allow units to opt into the Transport
Rule trading programs. Furthermore, on
July 15, 2010, EPA put a statement on
its Web site noting that the proposed
trading programs allow for opt-in units
and explaining that the two sentences
on 75 FR 45338 and 45340 are in error.
On August 2, 2010, the docket for the
proposed Transport Rule, including a
memorandum noting that this statement
had been put on EPA’s Web site, became
publicly available.
While EPA maintains that its proposal
is clear in proposing to allow opt-in
units, EPA is publishing this
amendment to the proposed Transport
Rule to eliminate any possible claim of
confusion. Specifically, EPA is
amending the two erroneous sentences
in the proposed Transport Rule
preamble as follows. The second
sentence in section V.F.3 of the
preamble (75 FR 45338 (col. 1)) is
amended to read: ‘‘First, the proposed
Transport Rule allows units to opt into
the trading programs.’’ The seventh
sentence of section V.G.1 of the
preamble (75 FR 45340 (col. 2)) is
amended to read: ‘‘The Transport Rule
programs as proposed have opt-in
provisions, so sources, including those
that have opted into the Acid Rain
Program, would be able to opt into the
Transport Rule programs.’’ These
amendments are technical changes that
do not alter the substance of the
proposal. On the contrary, the
amendments simply make two
sentences in the preamble that
summarily refer to the treatment of optin units in the proposal consistent with
the portions of the preamble and rule
text that contain not only a
comprehensive, detailed discussion of
EPA’s proposed inclusion of opt-in
units in the proposed Transport Rule
programs, but also the proposed opt-in
provisions themselves.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
This action only corrects minor,
technical errors in the proposed
Transport Rule and, as discussed above,
does not make any substantive change
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55710-55711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22819]
[[Page 55710]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 200
RIN 0596-AC89
Enhancing Policies Relating to Partnerships
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rule making; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is proposing to establish an internal
directive at Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1509.14 that would enhance
policies related to partnerships. We invite public comment on assessing
what changes or additions are needed relating to the Agency's use of
partnership arrangements in carrying out our mission. These comments
will be considered in developing the proposed directive.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by November 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning this notice should be addressed
to Forest Service, USDA, Attn: Director, National Partnership Office,
Joe Meade, Mailstop 1158, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC,
20250-1125.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to abloucks@fs.fed.us, or by
the electronic process available at Federal e-Rulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect comments received at 201 14th Street,
SW., Room 3NE, Washington, DC 20250. Visitors are encouraged to call
ahead 202-205-1055 to facilitate entrance into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Bedell-Loucks, Deputy Director,
National Partnership Office, 202-205-8336 or abloucks@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339, between 8
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for the Proposed Directive
Strong partnerships are vital to the Forest Service's mission, and
by ensuring clear guidance on the use of such arrangements, the Forest
Service will be better able to promote their use.
Throughout its 100-year history, the Forest Service has utilized
partnership arrangements with States, Tribes, non-governmental
organizations, and others to help carry out the motto ``Caring for the
Land and Serving People.'' These arrangements are used in a variety of
ways to support Forest Service programs on Federal, State, Tribal and
private lands, including ecological restoration and enhancement,
interpretation and educational services, enhancement of recreation
opportunities, and wildlife habitat improvements. These programs
readily provide a spectrum of benefits to the Forest Service, its
partners, and the public and may include various instruments to
formalize relationships, including grants, contracts or ``mutual
benefit'' agreements.
A number of statutory authorities govern how and when the Forest
Service may work cooperatively with partners, such as the Cooperative
Funds Act, Cooperative Funds and Deposits Act, Cooperative Forestry
Assistance Act, Granger-Thye Act, Federal Grants and Cooperative
Agreements Act, and Public Law 105-277, Section 323 as amended by
Public Law 111-11, Section 3001, Watershed Restoration and Enhancement
Agreements. (For more background on the Forest Service's use of
partnership arrangements, readers are referred to the Partnership
Guide, https://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/partnership-guide/Partnership-Guide.pdf).
Establishing partnerships and utilizing them to their greatest
potential has not always been a simple matter for the Forest Service
and its partners. Challenges have resulted, in part, from the
multiplicity of partnership authorities, varying interpretation of
these authorities, and time-consuming processes for consummating
partnership agreements. To address such challenges, the Forest Service
has taken a number of steps in recent years, including creating an
internal task force, to identify barriers to partnership utilization,
establishing the National Partnership Office, and developing various
legislative proposals.
In 2007, the Forest Service embarked on an initiative to institute
needed modifications to Agency policy intended to reduce barriers to
partnership arrangements. An essential part of this initiative was the
review of a number of policy issues raised over the years by those
inside and outside the Forest Service that impede effective use of
partnerships. Based on that review, these issues fall into several
broad categories: Administrative processes; interpretation of legal
authorities; accountability and reporting; human resources and ethics;
and funding.
Public Input Requested On Policy Needs
The Forest Service is requesting public input with respect to
Agency policy. Our intent with the issuance of this notice is to
consider such input and, as appropriate, incorporate it in developing
this policy. Certain suggestions, whether due to legislative or other
limitations, may not be implemented through Agency policy, and we wish
for the public to understand that as well.
The Forest Service is especially interested in receiving input to
the following questions:
1. Purposes served by partnership arrangements: What should be the
purpose(s) of partnership arrangements between the Forest Service and
State, Tribal, non-governmental, or other organizations or individuals?
Where can or should partnerships have the greatest impact in the
future, and toward what ends?
2. Essential characteristics of partnerships: When the Forest
Service and a partner work together, what are the essential
characteristics that are needed in that relationship to lead to a
successful outcome? In what ways does Agency guidance regarding the
essential characteristics of the partnership relationship need
clarification?
3. Reaching new partners: As the Nation's demographics change, the
people served by the Forest Service are becoming increasingly diverse.
The Agency wants to reflect this diversity in its partnership
activities. We are interested in hearing from the public about: (a)
Which potential partners are under-represented and under-served; (b)
what kinds of work are these individuals or organizations involved in;
(c) how engaging these partners will be beneficial; and (d) how the
Forest Service can better access and communicate with under-represented
and under-served groups.
4. Partner recognition and sponsorship: Increasingly, non-
governmental organizations and individuals are expressing interest in
working with the Forest Service to improve the condition of our
environment, including our Nation's forests. The Forest Service is able
to work with many of these organizations directly, as well as
indirectly through established non-profits (for example, the National
Forest Foundation and others). As a Federal agency, there are
limitations on how we work with and recognize particular partners (for
[[Page 55711]]
example, signage, plaques, media and communication). What are the
appropriate ways the Forest Service should recognize our partners, both
non-profit and for-profit?
Conclusion
The Forest Service is considering how best to proceed with policy
development relating to partnership arrangements. Public input relating
to the questions listed above will be helpful in developing the
Agency's policy.
Dated: September 8, 2010.
Thomas L. Tidwell,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22819 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P