Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of Seven Midwest Species, 55820-55823 [2010-22812]
Download as PDF
55820
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Notices
Lance Carrington—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Investigations—
West.
Yvette Savoy—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Investigations—
North.
Tammy Whitcomb—Assistant
Inspector General for Audits.
Robert Batta—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Audits—Mission
Operations.
John Cihota—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Audits—Financial
Accountability.
Darrell Benjamin—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Audits—Revenue
and Systems.
Mark Duda—Deputy Assistant
Inspector General for Audits—Support
Operations.
Mohammad Adra—Assistant
Inspector General for Risk Analysis
Research Center.
Dated: August 30, 2010.
Mark D. Jones,
Acting Executive Director, Council of the
Inspectors General on Integrity and
Efficiency.
[FR Doc. 2010–22691 Filed 9–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for 1029–0030
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing
its intention to request approval for the
collection of information for 30 CFR
part 764—State Processes for
Designating Areas Unsuitable for
Surface Coal Mining Operations. This
collection request has been forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
information collection request describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden and cost.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collections but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, public comments
should be submitted to OMB by October
14, 2010, in order to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Sep 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Department of
Interior Desk Officer, by telefax at (202)
395–5806 or via e-mail to
OIRA_Docket@omb.eop.gov. Also,
please send a copy of your comments to
John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave., NW., Room 202–SIB,
Washington, DC 20240, or electronically
to jtrelease@osmre.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of this information
collection request, contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or electronically to
jtrelease@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and record activities [see 5
CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has submitted a
request to OMB to renew its approval of
the collection of information contained
in: 30 CFR part 764—State Processes for
Designating Areas Unsuitable for
Surface Coal Mining Operations. OSM is
requesting a 3-year term of approval for
each information collection activity.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection is 1029–0030,
and displayed in 30 CFR 764.10.
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a
Federal Register notice soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on June 29,
2010 (75 FR 37458). No comments were
received. This notice provides the
public with an additional 30 days in
which to comment on the following
information collection activity:
Title: 30 CFR 764—State Processes for
Designating Areas Unsuitable for
Surface Coal Mining Operations Areas
designated by Act of Congress.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0030.
Summary: This part implements the
requirement of section 522 of the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA),
Public Law 95–87, which provides
authority for citizens to petition States
to designate lands unsuitable for surface
coal mining operations, or to terminate
such designation. The regulatory
authority uses the information to
identify, locate, compare and evaluate
the area requested to be designated as
unsuitable, or terminate the designation,
for surface coal mining operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals or groups that petition the
States, and the State regulatory
authorities that must process the
petitions.
Total Annual Respondents: 4
petitions and 4 regulatory authorities.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 5,200.
Total Annual Non-wage Costs: $400.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burdens on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collections of the
information, to the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to OMB
control number 1029–0030 in all
correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: September 8, 2010.
John R. Craynon,
Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2010–22733 Filed 9–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2010–N129; 30120–1113–
0000–C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of
Seven Midwest Species
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews;
request for information.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
of seven animal and plant species. We
conduct these reviews to ensure that our
classification of each species on the
Lists of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants as threatened or
endangered is accurate. A 5-year review
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Notices
assesses the best scientific and
commercial data available at the time of
the review. We are requesting the public
to send us any information that has
become available since the most recent
status reviews on each of these species.
Based on review results, we will
determine whether we should change
the listing status of any of these species.
To ensure consideration, please
send your written information by
November 15, 2010. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
DATES:
For how and where to send
comments or information, see ‘‘VIII.
Contacts’’ under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES:
To
request information, see ‘‘VIII. Contacts’’
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Individuals who are hearing impaired or
speech impaired may call the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8337 for TTY
(telephone typewriter or teletypewriter)
assistance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why do we conduct a 5-year review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we maintain Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which
we collectively refer to as the List) in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12
(for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires us to review each listed
species’ status at least once every 5
years. Then, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we
determine whether to remove any
species from the List (delist), to
reclassify it from endangered to
threatened, or to reclassify it from
threatened to endangered. Any change
in Federal classification requires a
separate rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following
definitions, from 50 CFR 424.02:
(A) Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, that
interbreeds when mature;
(B) Endangered species means any
species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range; and
55821
(C) Threatened species means any
species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best
scientific and commercial data
available, and only consider delisting if
data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons (50
CFR 424.11(d)):
(A) The species is considered extinct;
(B) The species is considered to be
recovered; or
(C) The original data available when
the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the species
we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5year status reviews of the species in
table 1.
TABLE 1—CURRENT LISTING STATUS OF SPECIES UNDER 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW
Common name
Scientific name
Status
Where listed
Final listing rule
publication date and
citation
Animals
Higgins eye ..........................
Lampsilis higginsii ................
Endangered .........................
Snail, Iowa Pleistocene .......
Discus macclintocki .............
Endangered .........................
U.S.A. (IA, IL, MN, MO, NE,
WI).
U.S.A. (IA, IL) ......................
Beetle, Hungerford’s crawling water.
Brychius hungerfordi ............
Endangered .........................
U.S.A. (MI, Canada) ............
June 14, 1976
(41 FR 24064).
July 3, 1978
(43 FR 28932).
March 7, 1994
(59 FR 10580).
Plants
Missouri bladderpod ............
Physaria filiformis
(=Lesquerella filiformis).
Trifolium stoloniferum ..........
Threatened ..........................
U.S.A. (AR, MO) ..................
Endangered .........................
Western prairie fringed orchid.
Platanthera praeclara ..........
Threatened ..........................
Pitcher’s thistle ....................
Cirsium pitcheri ....................
Threatened ..........................
U.S.A. (AR, IL, IN, KS, KY,
MO, OH, WV).
U.S.A. (IA, KS, MN, MO,
ND, NE, OK, SD), Canada
(Man.).
U.S.A. (IL, IN, MI, WI), Canada (Ont.).
Running buffalo clover .........
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information
available at the time we conduct a 5year status review. We consider the best
scientific and commercial data that has
become available since our current
listing determination or most recent
status review, accessible from our Web
site https://www.fws.gov/midwest/
Endangered/recovery/5yr_rev/
completed5yrs.html, such as:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Sep 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
(A) Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
(B) Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
(C) Conservation measures that have
been implemented that benefit the
species;
(D) Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘How Do We
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
October 15, 2003
(68 FR 59337).
June 5, 1987
(52 FR 21478).
September 28, 1989
(54 FR 39857).
July 18, 1988
(53 FR 27137).
Determine Whether a Species Is
Endangered or Threatened?’’); and
(E) Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
identification of erroneous information
contained in the List, and improved
analytical methods.
IV. How do we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
we determine whether a species is
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
55822
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Notices
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors:
(A) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we
must base our assessment of these
factors solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available.
V. What could happen as a result of our
review?
For each species under review, if we
find new information that indicates a
change in classification may be
warranted, we may propose a new rule
that could do one of the following:
(A) Reclassify the species from
threatened to endangered (uplist);
(B) Reclassify the species from
endangered to threatened (downlist); or
(C) Remove the species from the List
(delist).
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species remains on the List under its
current status. Therefore, elsewhere in
today’s issue of the Federal Register, we
have published a direct final rule to
notify the public that we are revising the
List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants (50 CFR 17.12(h)) to reflect the
most recent scientifically accepted
taxonomy and nomenclature of Physaria
filiformis (=Lesquerella f.), in
accordance with 50 CFR 17.12(b). We
published our direct final rule because
revision of the List for this purpose is
a noncontroversial action that, in the
best interest of the public, should be
undertaken in as timely manner as
possible. The direct final rule will be
effective on the date specified (see the
DATES section of the rule) unless we
receive significant adverse comments.
Significant adverse comments are
comments that provide strong
justifications as to why our rule should
not be adopted or why it should be
changed. We will give the same
consideration to comments submitted in
response to either our direct final rule
or notice to initiate 5-year reviews; you
do not need to submit separate
comments in regard to the taxonomy of
Missouri bladderpod for both
documents.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we request new
information from all sources. See ‘‘What
Information Do We Consider in Our
Review?’’ for specific criteria. If you
submit information, support it with
documentation such as maps,
bibliographic references, methods used
to gather and analyze the data, and/or
copies of any pertinent publications,
reports, or letters by knowledgeable
sources.
Submit your comments and materials
to the appropriate U.S. Fish and
Species
725–3548,
Iowa Pleistocene snail ........................................
Ms. Kristen Lundh, (309)
kristen_lundh@fws.gov.
757–5800,
Hungerford’s crawling water beetle ....................
Ms. Barbara Hosler, (517) 351–6326, barbara_hosler@fws.gov.
Physaria filiformis (=Lesquerella filiformis) .........
Dr. Paul McKenzie, (573) 234–2132, extension 107, paul_mckenzie@fws.gov.
Trifolium stoloniferum .........................................
Ms. Julie Proell, (614) 416–8993, extension
19, julie_proell@fws.gov.
Cirsium pitcheri ...................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Mr.
Phil
Delphey,
(612)
phil_delphey@fws.gov.
Ms. Tameka Dandridge, (517) 351–8315,
tameka_dandridge@fws.gov.
16:38 Sep 13, 2010
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the offices where the comments
are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information
on the following species, as well as
requests for information, to the
corresponding contacts. You may view
information we receive in response to
this notice, as well as other
documentation in our files, at the
following locations by appointment,
during normal business hours.
Contact person, phone, e-mail
Higgins eye (pearlymussel) and Platanthera
praeclara.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Wildlife Service office listed under
‘‘VIII. Contacts.’’
Submit all electronic information in
Text or Rich Text format to
FW3MidwestRegion_5YearReview
@fws.gov. Please send information for
each species in a separate e-mail.
Provide your name and return address
in the body of your message, and
include the following identifier in your
e-mail subject line: Information on 5year review for [NAME OF SPECIES].
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Contact address
Twin Cities Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1401 American Boulevard E.,
Bloomington, MN 55425–1665.
Rock Island Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1511 47th Avenue, Moline, IL
61265.
East Lansing Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite
101, East Lansing, MI 48823–5902.
Columbia Missouri Field Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive,
Suite A, Columbia, MO 65203–0057.
Ohio Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104, Columbus, OH 43230.
East Lansing Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite
101, East Lansing, MI 48823–5902.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 14, 2010 / Notices
IX. Authority
We publish this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: August 27, 2010.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director, Midwest Region, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–22812 Filed 9–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Compact.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes an
extension of Gaming between the Oglala
Sioux Tribe and the State of South
Dakota.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: September 14,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This amendment
allows for the extension of the current
Tribal-State Compact until December
31, 2010.
Dated: September 2, 2010.
Donald Laverdure,
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–22784 Filed 9–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion:
Denver Museum of Nature & Science,
Denver, CO; Correction
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Sep 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains and associated funerary objects
in the control of the Denver Museum of
Nature & Science, Denver, CO. The
human remains and associated funerary
objects were removed from Grand
County, UT; possibly eastern Utah or
western Colorado; Montezuma County,
CO; and the American ‘‘Southwest.’’
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service;s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains and
associated funerary objects. The
National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
This notice corrects a Notice of
Inventory Completion published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 42770–42771,
July 22, 2010) with the addition of 13
associated funerary objects. Since the
publication of the notice, additional
associated funerary objects likely
removed from an unknown site in
eastern Utah or western Colorado by H.
Marie Wormington were found to be in
the possession of the Denver Museum of
Nature & Science collections.
In the Federal Register of July 22,
2010, paragraph number 4, page 42770,
is corrected by substituting the
following paragraph:
In the 1940s, human remains
representing a minimum of four
individuals were likely removed during
excavations in eastern Utah or western
Colorado by H. Marie Wormington,
archeologist. In 1993, Wormington
donated these remains to the museum
(DMNS catalogue (and CUI numbers)
A1985.1 (CUI 24), A1985.2 (CUI 25),
A1985.3 (CUI 26), and A1985.4 (CUI
27)). The remains include one adult
female, one child of indeterminate sex,
and two adults of indeterminate sex.
Most of these individuals are
represented by fragmentary remains.
Newspaper wrappings around the
remains are dated to March 12, 1949.
Wormingtoncoms field expeditions
during this time focused on the area
between Utah and Colorado. No known
individuals were identified. The 13
associated funerary objects are
unworked rocks associated with the
adult female (DMNS catalogue number
A1985.1).
In the Federal Register of July 22,
2010, paragraph number 2, page 42771,
is corrected by substituting the
following paragraph:
Officials of the Denver Museum of
Nature & Science have determined that,
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55823
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described above
represent the physical remains of 16
individuals of Native American
ancestry. Officials of the Denver
Museum of Nature & Science also have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001(3)(A), the 17 objects described
above are reasonably believed to have
been placed with or near individual
human remains at the time of death or
later as part of the death rite or
ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Denver
Museum of Nature & Science have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001(2), a relationship of shared group
identity cannot be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and associated funerary objects
and any present-day Indian tribe.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains and
associated funerary objects should
contact Dr. Chip ColwellChanthaphonh, Denver Museum of
Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd.,
Denver, CO 80205, telephone (303) 370–
6378, before October 14, 2010.
Disposition of the human remains and
associated funerary objects to the Hopi
Tribe of Arizona; Pueblo of Acoma, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico; and
the Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation,
New Mexico, may proceed after that
date if no additional claimants come
forward.
The Denver Museum of Nature &
Science is responsible for notifying the
Ak Chin Indian Community of the
Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation,
Arizona; Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of
Arizona, California & Nevada; Fort Sill
Apache Tribe of Oklahoma; Gila River
Indian Community of the Gila River
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Havasupai
Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation,
Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona;
Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Jicarilla
Apache Nation, New Mexico; Mescalero
Apache Tribe of the Mescalero
Reservation, New Mexico; Navajo
Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah;
Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Cochiti,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Isleta, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Nambe, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Sandia, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa
Ana, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa
Clara, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santo
Domingo, New Mexico; Pueblo of Taos,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Tesuque, New
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55820-55823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22812]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-ES-2010-N129; 30120-1113-0000-C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status
Reviews of Seven Midwest Species
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act), of seven animal and plant species. We conduct these reviews to
ensure that our classification of each species on the Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants as threatened or
endangered is accurate. A 5-year review
[[Page 55821]]
assesses the best scientific and commercial data available at the time
of the review. We are requesting the public to send us any information
that has become available since the most recent status reviews on each
of these species. Based on review results, we will determine whether we
should change the listing status of any of these species.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written information by
November 15, 2010. However, we will continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For how and where to send comments or information, see
``VIII. Contacts'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request information, see ``VIII.
Contacts'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Individuals who are hearing
impaired or speech impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-
877-8337 for TTY (telephone typewriter or teletypewriter) assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why do we conduct a 5-year review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which we collectively
refer to as the List) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of
the Act requires us to review each listed species' status at least once
every 5 years. Then, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether to
remove any species from the List (delist), to reclassify it from
endangered to threatened, or to reclassify it from threatened to
endangered. Any change in Federal classification requires a separate
rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following definitions, from 50 CFR
424.02:
(A) Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife,
or plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of
vertebrate, that interbreeds when mature;
(B) Endangered species means any species that is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; and
(C) Threatened species means any species that is likely to become
an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best scientific and commercial
data available, and only consider delisting if data substantiate that
the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the
following reasons (50 CFR 424.11(d)):
(A) The species is considered extinct;
(B) The species is considered to be recovered; or
(C) The original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5-year status reviews of the
species in table 1.
Table 1--Current Listing Status of Species Under 5-year Status Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final listing rule
Common name Scientific name Status Where listed publication date and
citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Higgins eye................... Lampsilis Endangered...... U.S.A. (IA, IL, June 14, 1976
higginsii. MN, MO, NE, WI). (41 FR 24064).
Snail, Iowa Pleistocene....... Discus Endangered...... U.S.A. (IA, IL). July 3, 1978
macclintocki. (43 FR 28932).
Beetle, Hungerford's crawling Brychius Endangered...... U.S.A. (MI, March 7, 1994
water. hungerfordi. Canada). (59 FR 10580).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri bladderpod........... Physaria Threatened...... U.S.A. (AR, MO). October 15, 2003 (68 FR
filiformis 59337).
(=Lesquerella
filiformis).
Running buffalo clover........ Trifolium Endangered...... U.S.A. (AR, IL, June 5, 1987
stoloniferum. IN, KS, KY, MO, (52 FR 21478).
OH, WV).
Western prairie fringed orchid Platanthera Threatened...... U.S.A. (IA, KS, September 28, 1989
praeclara. MN, MO, ND, NE, (54 FR 39857).
OK, SD), Canada
(Man.).
Pitcher's thistle............. Cirsium pitcheri. Threatened...... U.S.A. (IL, IN, July 18, 1988
MI, WI), Canada (53 FR 27137).
(Ont.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information available at the time we conduct a
5-year status review. We consider the best scientific and commercial
data that has become available since our current listing determination
or most recent status review, accessible from our Web site https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/recovery/5yr_rev/completed5yrs.html,
such as:
(A) Species biology, including but not limited to population
trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
(B) Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability;
(C) Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit
the species;
(D) Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How
Do We Determine Whether a Species Is Endangered or Threatened?''); and
(E) Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical
methods.
IV. How do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a
species is
[[Page 55822]]
endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five following
factors:
(A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we must base our assessment of
these factors solely on the best scientific and commercial data
available.
V. What could happen as a result of our review?
For each species under review, if we find new information that
indicates a change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a
new rule that could do one of the following:
(A) Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist);
(B) Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened
(downlist); or
(C) Remove the species from the List (delist).
If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted,
then the species remains on the List under its current status.
Therefore, elsewhere in today's issue of the Federal Register, we have
published a direct final rule to notify the public that we are revising
the List of Endangered and Threatened Plants (50 CFR 17.12(h)) to
reflect the most recent scientifically accepted taxonomy and
nomenclature of Physaria filiformis (=Lesquerella f.), in accordance
with 50 CFR 17.12(b). We published our direct final rule because
revision of the List for this purpose is a noncontroversial action
that, in the best interest of the public, should be undertaken in as
timely manner as possible. The direct final rule will be effective on
the date specified (see the DATES section of the rule) unless we
receive significant adverse comments. Significant adverse comments are
comments that provide strong justifications as to why our rule should
not be adopted or why it should be changed. We will give the same
consideration to comments submitted in response to either our direct
final rule or notice to initiate 5-year reviews; you do not need to
submit separate comments in regard to the taxonomy of Missouri
bladderpod for both documents.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we request new
information from all sources. See ``What Information Do We Consider in
Our Review?'' for specific criteria. If you submit information, support
it with documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Submit your comments and materials to the appropriate U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service office listed under ``VIII. Contacts.''
Submit all electronic information in Text or Rich Text format to
FW3MidwestRegion_5YearReview@fws.gov. Please send information for each
species in a separate e-mail. Provide your name and return address in
the body of your message, and include the following identifier in your
e-mail subject line: Information on 5-year review for [NAME OF
SPECIES].
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
offices where the comments are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information on the following species, as
well as requests for information, to the corresponding contacts. You
may view information we receive in response to this notice, as well as
other documentation in our files, at the following locations by
appointment, during normal business hours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact person,
Species phone, e-mail Contact address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Higgins eye (pearlymussel) Mr. Phil Delphey, Twin Cities Field
and Platanthera praeclara. (612) 725-3548, Office, U.S. Fish
phil--delphey@fws.g and Wildlife
ov. Service, 1401
American Boulevard
E., Bloomington, MN
55425-1665.
Iowa Pleistocene snail...... Ms. Kristen Lundh, Rock Island Field
(309) 757-5800, Office, U.S. Fish
kristen--lundh@fws. and Wildlife
gov. Service, 1511 47th
Avenue, Moline, IL
61265.
Hungerford's crawling water Ms. Barbara Hosler, East Lansing Field
beetle. (517) 351-6326, Office, U.S. Fish
barbara--hosler@fws and Wildlife
.gov. Service, 2651
Coolidge Road,
Suite 101, East
Lansing, MI 48823-
5902.
Physaria filiformis Dr. Paul McKenzie, Columbia Missouri
(=Lesquerella filiformis). (573) 234-2132, Field Office, U.S.
extension 107, Fish and Wildlife
paul--mckenzie@fws. Service, 101 Park
gov. DeVille Drive,
Suite A, Columbia,
MO 65203-0057.
Trifolium stoloniferum...... Ms. Julie Proell, Ohio Field Office,
(614) 416-8993, U.S. Fish and
extension 19, Wildlife Service,
julie--proell@fws.g 4625 Morse Road,
ov. Suite 104,
Columbus, OH 43230.
Cirsium pitcheri............ Ms. Tameka East Lansing Field
Dandridge, (517) Office, U.S. Fish
351-8315, tameka-- and Wildlife
dandridge@fws.gov. Service, 2651
Coolidge Road,
Suite 101, East
Lansing, MI 48823-
5902.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 55823]]
IX. Authority
We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: August 27, 2010.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director, Midwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22812 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P