Fee for Using a Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2011, 55589-55591 [2010-22760]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Notices
train and support health care providers
and other professionals in public and
private agencies who serve Florida’s
CYSHCN, helping them better
understand the needs of children, youth
and their families.
´
The Family Cafe will receive funding
through May 31, 2011 to continue the
same state-wide services as previously
outlined in the originally competed and
approved grant application submitted
by FIFI. This replacement award will
maintain Congress’ mandate under the
2005 Budget Deficit Reduction Act/
Family Opportunity Act and the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111–148) that there shall be an
F2F HIC in all 50 states and the District
of Columbia by June 2009. It will also
ensure that an F2F HIC will be
accessible to families and professionals
to continue providing essential
information, referral and support
services to families with CYSHCN
throughout Florida and in a manner
which avoids any disruption of services.
Dated: September 3, 2010.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–22663 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0463]
Fee for Using a Priority Review
Voucher in Fiscal Year 2011
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
fee rates for using a tropical disease
priority review voucher for fiscal year
(FY) 2011. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as
amended by title XI of the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA), authorizes FDA to
determine and collect priority review
user fees for certain applications for
approval of drug or biological products
when those applications use a priority
review voucher awarded by the
Secretary of Health and Human
Services. These vouchers are awarded to
the sponsor of certain tropical disease
product applications, submitted after
September 27, 2007, upon FDA
approval of such applications. The
amount of the fee to be submitted to
FDA with applications using a priority
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
review voucher is determined each
fiscal year (FY) based on the average
cost incurred by FDA in the review of
a human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous FY.
This notice establishes the priority
review fee rate for FY 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Miller, Office of Financial
Management (HFA–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–7103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1102 of FDAAA added new
section 524 to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360n). In section 524, Congress
encouraged development of new drug
and biological products for prevention
and treatment of certain tropical
diseases by offering additional
incentives for obtaining FDA approval
of such products. Under section 524, the
sponsor of an eligible human drug
application submitted after September
27, 2007, for a qualified tropical disease
(as defined in section 524(a)(3)), shall
receive a priority review voucher upon
approval of the tropical disease product
application. The recipient of a priority
review voucher may either use the
voucher with a future submission to
FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (21 U.S.C. 262), or transfer
(including by sale) the voucher to
another party that may then use it. A
priority review is a review conducted
with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) goal date of 6 months.
The applicant that uses a priority
review voucher is entitled to a priority
review but must pay FDA a priority
review user fee in addition to any other
fee required by PDUFA. FDA has
published a draft guidance on its Web
site about how this priority review
voucher program will operate (available
at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/
ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the priority
review fee rate for 2011 of $4,582,000,
and outlines FDA’s process for
implementing the collection of the
priority review user fees. This rate is
effective on October 1, 2010, and will
remain in effect through September 30,
2011, for applications submitted with a
priority review voucher, and the
payment of this priority review user fee
is required in addition to the payment
of any other fee that would normally
apply to such an application under
PDUFA before FDA considers the
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55589
application complete and acceptable for
filing.
II. Priority Review User Fee for FY
2011
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C
Act, the amount of the priority review
user fee is to be determined each FY
based on the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application subject to priority review in
the previous FY.
A priority review is a review
conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months. Normally, an application for a
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER) product will qualify for a
priority review if FDA determines that
the product, if approved, would provide
safe and effective therapy where no
satisfactory alternative therapy exists or
would be a significant improvement
compared to marketed products,
including non-drug products and/or
therapies, in the treatment, diagnosis, or
prevention of a disease. A Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER) product will qualify for a
priority review if FDA determines that
the product, if approved, would be a
significant improvement in the safety or
effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis,
or prevention of a serious or lifethreatening disease. FDA has committed
to a goal to review and act on 90 percent
of the applications that have been
granted priority review status no later
than 6 months after receipt. An
application that does not receive a
priority designation will receive a
‘‘standard’’ review. Under the goals
identified in the letters referenced in
section 101(c) of FDAAA, FDA commits
to a goal to review and act on 90 percent
of ‘‘standard’’ applications within 10
months of the date of receipt. A priority
review involves a more intensive level
of effort and a higher level of resources
than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the fee amount should be based on
the average cost incurred by the Agency
for a priority review in the previous FY.
Because FDA has never tracked the cost
of reviewing applications that get
priority review as a separate cost subset,
FDA estimated this cost based on other
data that the Agency has tracked and
kept. FDA started by using data that the
Agency estimates and publishes on its
Web site each year—standard costs for
review. FDA does not publish a
standard cost for ‘‘the review of a human
drug application subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year.’’
However, we expect all such
applications would contain clinical
data. The standard cost application
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
55590
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Notices
categories with clinical data that FDA
does publish each year are as follows:
(1) New drug applications (NDAs) for
a new molecular entity (NME) with
clinical data and
(2) Biologic license applications
(BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for
FY 2009, the latest year for which
standard cost data are available, show a
standard cost of $4,021,000 (rounded to
the nearest thousand dollars) for an
NDA with clinical data and $3,530,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars) for a BLA. Based on these
standard costs, the total cost to review
the 55 applications in these 2 categories
in FY 2009 (24 BLAs and 31 NDAs with
clinical data) was $209,371,000. (Note:
no investigational new drug (IND)
review costs are included in this
amount; they will be calculated
separately and added in the next
paragraph.) Records acquired from
CDER and CBER by the Office of Policy,
Planning and Budget (OPPB),
Economics Staff, indicate that a total of
17 of these applications (8 NDAs
[excluding the President’s Emergency
Plan for Aids Relief NDAs] and 9 BLAs)
received priority review, which would
mean that the remaining 38 received
standard reviews. Because a priority
review compresses a review that
ordinarily takes 10 months into 6
months, OPPB estimates that a
multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided
by 6 months) should be applied to nonpriority review costs in estimating the
effort and cost of a priority review as
compared to a standard review. This
multiplier is consistent with published
research on this subject. In the article
‘‘Developing Drugs for Developing
Countries,’’ published in Health Affairs,
vol. 25, Number 2, in 2006, the analysis
by David B. Ridley, Henry G.
Grabowski, and Jeffrey L. Moe supports
a priority review multiplier in the range
of 1.48 to 2.35. The multiplier derived
by FDA falls well below the midpoint of
this range. Using FY 2009 figures, the
costs of a priority and standard review
are estimated using the following
formula:
(17a x 1.67) + (38a) = $209,371,000
where ‘‘a’’ is the cost of a standard
review and ‘‘a’’ times 1.67 is the cost of
a priority review. Using this formula,
the cost of a standard review for NMEs
is calculated to be $3,154,000 (rounded
to the nearest thousand dollars) and the
cost of a priority review for NMEs is
1.67 times that amount, or $5,267,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars).
Next, the cost of the IND review phase
for these applications is calculated. The
standard lifetime cost of reviewing a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
drug IND in FY 2009 was $291,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars). The standard lifetime cost of a
biologic IND review in FY 2009 was
$860,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars). Because there were 8
priority NDAs and 9 priority BLAs
received in FY 2009, the following
formula estimates the average cost of the
IND review phase of an application:
(8 NDAs x $291,000) + (9 BLAs x
$860,000) = $10,068,000
This is the full cost of the IND review
associated with the 17 priority review
applications received in FY 2009.
Dividing $10,068,000 by 17 (the total
number of priority review applications
received in FY 2009), yields an average
IND review phase cost of $592,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars) per priority review application.
Adding the cost of the NDA/BLA
priority review calculated previously,
$5,267,000, to the cost of the IND review
phase of $592,000, results in an
estimated average cost for priority
review for an application received in FY
2009 of $5,859,000.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the fee amount should be based on
the average cost incurred by the Agency
for a priority review in the previous FY.
FDA is setting fees for FY 2011, and the
previous FY is FY 2010. However, the
FY 2010 submission cohort has not been
closed out yet, and the cost data for FY
2010 are not complete. The latest year
for which FDA has data is FY 2009.
Accordingly, FDA will adjust the
previously mentioned FY 2009 cost
figure by the average amount by which
FDA’s average salary and benefit costs
increased in the 5 years prior to FY
2011, to adjust the FY 2009 amount for
cost increases in FY 2010. That figure,
published in the Federal Register of
August 4, 2010 (75 FR 46952 at 46954),
which set Prescription Drug User Fees
for FY 2011, is 4.53 percent. Increasing
the FY 2009 average priority review cost
figure of $5,859,000 by 4.53 percent
results in an estimated cost of
$6,124,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars).
FDA will deduct from this amount the
PDUFA fee that must also be paid in
addition to the priority review fee when
an NDA or BLA with clinical data is
submitted in FY 2011. That amount,
also published in the Federal Register
of August 4, 2010 (75 FR 46952 at
46957), which set PDUFA fees for FY
2011, is $1,542,000. The difference,
rounded to the nearest thousand dollars,
is $4,582,000. This is the priority review
user fee amount for FY 2011 that must
be submitted with a priority review
voucher in FY 2011, in addition to any
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
PDUFA fee that is required for such an
application.
III. Priority Review Fee Schedule for
FY 2011
The fee rate for FY 2011 is set out in
table 1 of this document.
TABLE 1.
FEE CATEGORY
FEE RATE FOR
FY 2011
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH A PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHER
In addition to the normal PDUFA Fee
$4,582,000
IV. Implementation of Priority Review
Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the
FD&C Act, the priority review user fee
is due upon submission of the
application for which the priority
review voucher is used. Section
524(c)(4)(B) specifies that the
application will be considered
incomplete if the priority review user
fee and all other applicable user fees are
not paid in accordance with FDA
payment procedures. FDA may not grant
a waiver, exemption, reduction, or
refund of any fees due and payable
under this section of the FD&C Act, and
FDA may not collect priority review
voucher fees prior to a relevant
appropriation for fees for that FY.
Beginning with FDA’s appropriation for
FY 2009, the annual appropriation
language states specifically that ‘‘priority
review user fees authorized by 21 U.S.C.
360n (section 524 of the FD&C Act) may
be credited to this account, to remain
available until expended.’’ (Public Law
111–8, Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
The priority review fee established in
the new fee schedule must be paid for
any application that is received after
September 30, 2010, and submitted with
a priority review voucher. This fee must
be paid in addition to any other fee due
under PDUFA. Payment must be made
in U.S. currency by check, bank draft, or
U.S. postal money order payable to the
order of the Food and Drug
Administration. The user fee
identification (ID) number should be
included on the check, followed by the
words ‘‘Priority Review’’. Payments can
be mailed to: Food and Drug
Administration, P.O. Box 70963,
Charlotte, NC 28272–0963.
If checks are sent by a courier that
requests a street address, the courier can
deliver the checks to: Wells Fargo QLP
Lockbox D1113–022, Attn: Food and
Drug Administration Lockbox 70963,
1525 West WT Harris Blvd., Charlotte,
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Notices
NC 28262. (Note: This Wells Fargo
address is for courier delivery only.)
The FDA post office box number (P.O.
Box 70963) must be written on the
check. The tax identification number of
the Food and Drug Administration is
53–0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be
used. Please reference your unique user
fee ID number when completing your
transfer. The originating financial
institution may charge a wire transfer
fee. Please ask your financial institution
about the fee and include it with your
payment to ensure that your fee is fully
paid. The account information is as
follows: New York Federal Reserve
Bank, U.S. Dept. of Treasury, TREAS
NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY
10045, Acct. No.: 75060099, Routing
No.: 021030004, SWIFT: FRNYUS33,
Beneficiary: FDA, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850.
Application fees can also be paid
online with an electronic check (ACH).
FDA has partnered with the U.S.
Department of Treasury to utilize
Pay.gov, a Web-based payment
application, for online electronic
payment. The Pay.gov feature is
available on FDA’s Web site after the
user fee ID number is generated.
Dated: September 7, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–22760 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meetings
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflict: Prions, HCV and Beta-Lactams.
Date: September 23–24, 2010.
Time: 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
(Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person: Rolf Menzel, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3196,
MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
0952, menzelro@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Dental and
Oral Sciences.
Date: October 4, 2010.
Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Yi-Hsin Liu, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4214,
MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1781, liuyh@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Musculoskeletal, Oral
and Skin Sciences Integrated Review Group;
Oral, Dental and Craniofacial Sciences Study
Section.
Date: October 6, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW.,
Washington, DC 20015.
Contact Person: Yi-Hsin Liu, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4214,
MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1781, liuyh@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular
and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated
Review Group; Neurodifferentiation,
Plasticity, and Regeneration Study Section.
Date: October 6–7, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Savoy Suites Hotel, 2505 Wisconsin
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20007.
Contact Person: Joanne T. Fujii, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4184,
MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1178, fujiij@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular
and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated
Review Group; Neurogenesis and Cell Fate
Study Section.
Date: October 7, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Contact Person: Joanne T. Fujii, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55591
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4184,
MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1178, fujiij@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel Fellowship:
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
Time: 11:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Dharam S Dhindsa, DVM,
PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5110,
MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892,(301) 435–
1174, dhindsad@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel PAR09–057:
Improving Interventions for Communication
Disorders.
Date: October 18, 2010.
Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications, JW Marriott San Francisco
Union Square, 500 Post Street corner of Post
and Mason, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: Eugene Carstea, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5194,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408–
9756, carsteae@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Commitee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel PAR09–056:
Improving Intervention Possibilities for
Communication Disorders.
Date: October 18, 2010.
Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: JW Marriott San Francisco Union
Square, 500 Post Street corner of Post and
Mason, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: Eugene Carstea, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5194,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408–
9756, carsteae@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel Member
Conflict: Old mice.
Date: October 18, 2010.
Time: 12 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Room 3222, Bethesda, MD
20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: James Harwood, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5168,
MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1256, harwoodj@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel PAR–08–
076: Community Participation Research.
Date: October 19, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55589-55591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22760]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0463]
Fee for Using a Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2011
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the fee
rates for using a tropical disease priority review voucher for fiscal
year (FY) 2011. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act), as amended by title XI of the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), authorizes FDA to determine and collect
priority review user fees for certain applications for approval of drug
or biological products when those applications use a priority review
voucher awarded by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. These
vouchers are awarded to the sponsor of certain tropical disease product
applications, submitted after September 27, 2007, upon FDA approval of
such applications. The amount of the fee to be submitted to FDA with
applications using a priority review voucher is determined each fiscal
year (FY) based on the average cost incurred by FDA in the review of a
human drug application subject to priority review in the previous FY.
This notice establishes the priority review fee rate for FY 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Miller, Office of Financial
Management (HFA-100), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1102 of FDAAA added new section 524 to the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360n). In section 524, Congress encouraged development of new
drug and biological products for prevention and treatment of certain
tropical diseases by offering additional incentives for obtaining FDA
approval of such products. Under section 524, the sponsor of an
eligible human drug application submitted after September 27, 2007, for
a qualified tropical disease (as defined in section 524(a)(3)), shall
receive a priority review voucher upon approval of the tropical disease
product application. The recipient of a priority review voucher may
either use the voucher with a future submission to FDA under section
505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351 of the
Public Health Service Act (21 U.S.C. 262), or transfer (including by
sale) the voucher to another party that may then use it. A priority
review is a review conducted with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) goal date of 6 months.
The applicant that uses a priority review voucher is entitled to a
priority review but must pay FDA a priority review user fee in addition
to any other fee required by PDUFA. FDA has published a draft guidance
on its Web site about how this priority review voucher program will
operate (available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the priority review fee rate for 2011 of
$4,582,000, and outlines FDA's process for implementing the collection
of the priority review user fees. This rate is effective on October 1,
2010, and will remain in effect through September 30, 2011, for
applications submitted with a priority review voucher, and the payment
of this priority review user fee is required in addition to the payment
of any other fee that would normally apply to such an application under
PDUFA before FDA considers the application complete and acceptable for
filing.
II. Priority Review User Fee for FY 2011
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the priority
review user fee is to be determined each FY based on the average cost
incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous FY.
A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months. Normally, an application for a Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER) product will qualify for a priority review if FDA
determines that the product, if approved, would provide safe and
effective therapy where no satisfactory alternative therapy exists or
would be a significant improvement compared to marketed products,
including non-drug products and/or therapies, in the treatment,
diagnosis, or prevention of a disease. A Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) product will qualify for a priority
review if FDA determines that the product, if approved, would be a
significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the
treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a serious or life-threatening
disease. FDA has committed to a goal to review and act on 90 percent of
the applications that have been granted priority review status no later
than 6 months after receipt. An application that does not receive a
priority designation will receive a ``standard'' review. Under the
goals identified in the letters referenced in section 101(c) of FDAAA,
FDA commits to a goal to review and act on 90 percent of ``standard''
applications within 10 months of the date of receipt. A priority review
involves a more intensive level of effort and a higher level of
resources than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies that the fee amount should be
based on the average cost incurred by the Agency for a priority review
in the previous FY. Because FDA has never tracked the cost of reviewing
applications that get priority review as a separate cost subset, FDA
estimated this cost based on other data that the Agency has tracked and
kept. FDA started by using data that the Agency estimates and publishes
on its Web site each year--standard costs for review. FDA does not
publish a standard cost for ``the review of a human drug application
subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year.'' However, we
expect all such applications would contain clinical data. The standard
cost application
[[Page 55590]]
categories with clinical data that FDA does publish each year are as
follows:
(1) New drug applications (NDAs) for a new molecular entity (NME)
with clinical data and
(2) Biologic license applications (BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for FY 2009, the latest year for
which standard cost data are available, show a standard cost of
$4,021,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) for an NDA with
clinical data and $3,530,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars)
for a BLA. Based on these standard costs, the total cost to review the
55 applications in these 2 categories in FY 2009 (24 BLAs and 31 NDAs
with clinical data) was $209,371,000. (Note: no investigational new
drug (IND) review costs are included in this amount; they will be
calculated separately and added in the next paragraph.) Records
acquired from CDER and CBER by the Office of Policy, Planning and
Budget (OPPB), Economics Staff, indicate that a total of 17 of these
applications (8 NDAs [excluding the President's Emergency Plan for Aids
Relief NDAs] and 9 BLAs) received priority review, which would mean
that the remaining 38 received standard reviews. Because a priority
review compresses a review that ordinarily takes 10 months into 6
months, OPPB estimates that a multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided by
6 months) should be applied to non-priority review costs in estimating
the effort and cost of a priority review as compared to a standard
review. This multiplier is consistent with published research on this
subject. In the article ``Developing Drugs for Developing Countries,''
published in Health Affairs, vol. 25, Number 2, in 2006, the analysis
by David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski, and Jeffrey L. Moe supports a
priority review multiplier in the range of 1.48 to 2.35. The multiplier
derived by FDA falls well below the midpoint of this range. Using FY
2009 figures, the costs of a priority and standard review are estimated
using the following formula:
(17a x 1.67) + (38a) = $209,371,000
where ``a'' is the cost of a standard review and ``a'' times 1.67 is
the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the cost of a
standard review for NMEs is calculated to be $3,154,000 (rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a priority review for NMEs is
1.67 times that amount, or $5,267,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars).
Next, the cost of the IND review phase for these applications is
calculated. The standard lifetime cost of reviewing a drug IND in FY
2009 was $291,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). The
standard lifetime cost of a biologic IND review in FY 2009 was $860,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). Because there were 8
priority NDAs and 9 priority BLAs received in FY 2009, the following
formula estimates the average cost of the IND review phase of an
application:
(8 NDAs x $291,000) + (9 BLAs x $860,000) = $10,068,000
This is the full cost of the IND review associated with the 17
priority review applications received in FY 2009. Dividing $10,068,000
by 17 (the total number of priority review applications received in FY
2009), yields an average IND review phase cost of $592,000 (rounded to
the nearest thousand dollars) per priority review application.
Adding the cost of the NDA/BLA priority review calculated
previously, $5,267,000, to the cost of the IND review phase of
$592,000, results in an estimated average cost for priority review for
an application received in FY 2009 of $5,859,000.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies that the fee amount should be
based on the average cost incurred by the Agency for a priority review
in the previous FY. FDA is setting fees for FY 2011, and the previous
FY is FY 2010. However, the FY 2010 submission cohort has not been
closed out yet, and the cost data for FY 2010 are not complete. The
latest year for which FDA has data is FY 2009. Accordingly, FDA will
adjust the previously mentioned FY 2009 cost figure by the average
amount by which FDA's average salary and benefit costs increased in the
5 years prior to FY 2011, to adjust the FY 2009 amount for cost
increases in FY 2010. That figure, published in the Federal Register of
August 4, 2010 (75 FR 46952 at 46954), which set Prescription Drug User
Fees for FY 2011, is 4.53 percent. Increasing the FY 2009 average
priority review cost figure of $5,859,000 by 4.53 percent results in an
estimated cost of $6,124,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars).
FDA will deduct from this amount the PDUFA fee that must also be
paid in addition to the priority review fee when an NDA or BLA with
clinical data is submitted in FY 2011. That amount, also published in
the Federal Register of August 4, 2010 (75 FR 46952 at 46957), which
set PDUFA fees for FY 2011, is $1,542,000. The difference, rounded to
the nearest thousand dollars, is $4,582,000. This is the priority
review user fee amount for FY 2011 that must be submitted with a
priority review voucher in FY 2011, in addition to any PDUFA fee that
is required for such an application.
III. Priority Review Fee Schedule for FY 2011
The fee rate for FY 2011 is set out in table 1 of this document.
Table 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEE CATEGORY FEE RATE FOR FY 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH A PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHER
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the normal PDUFA Fee $4,582,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Implementation of Priority Review Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review
user fee is due upon submission of the application for which the
priority review voucher is used. Section 524(c)(4)(B) specifies that
the application will be considered incomplete if the priority review
user fee and all other applicable user fees are not paid in accordance
with FDA payment procedures. FDA may not grant a waiver, exemption,
reduction, or refund of any fees due and payable under this section of
the FD&C Act, and FDA may not collect priority review voucher fees
prior to a relevant appropriation for fees for that FY. Beginning with
FDA's appropriation for FY 2009, the annual appropriation language
states specifically that ``priority review user fees authorized by 21
U.S.C. 360n (section 524 of the FD&C Act) may be credited to this
account, to remain available until expended.'' (Public Law 111-8,
Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
The priority review fee established in the new fee schedule must be
paid for any application that is received after September 30, 2010, and
submitted with a priority review voucher. This fee must be paid in
addition to any other fee due under PDUFA. Payment must be made in U.S.
currency by check, bank draft, or U.S. postal money order payable to
the order of the Food and Drug Administration. The user fee
identification (ID) number should be included on the check, followed by
the words ``Priority Review''. Payments can be mailed to: Food and Drug
Administration, P.O. Box 70963, Charlotte, NC 28272-0963.
If checks are sent by a courier that requests a street address, the
courier can deliver the checks to: Wells Fargo QLP Lockbox D1113-022,
Attn: Food and Drug Administration Lockbox 70963, 1525 West WT Harris
Blvd., Charlotte,
[[Page 55591]]
NC 28262. (Note: This Wells Fargo address is for courier delivery
only.) The FDA post office box number (P.O. Box 70963) must be written
on the check. The tax identification number of the Food and Drug
Administration is 53-0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be used. Please reference your
unique user fee ID number when completing your transfer. The
originating financial institution may charge a wire transfer fee.
Please ask your financial institution about the fee and include it with
your payment to ensure that your fee is fully paid. The account
information is as follows: New York Federal Reserve Bank, U.S. Dept. of
Treasury, TREAS NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY 10045, Acct. No.:
75060099, Routing No.: 021030004, SWIFT: FRNYUS33, Beneficiary: FDA,
1350 Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850.
Application fees can also be paid online with an electronic check
(ACH). FDA has partnered with the U.S. Department of Treasury to
utilize Pay.gov, a Web-based payment application, for online electronic
payment. The Pay.gov feature is available on FDA's Web site after the
user fee ID number is generated.
Dated: September 7, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-22760 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S