Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Pequonnock River, Bridgeport, CT, 55475-55477 [2010-22749]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Notice must be preceded by a written
letter of representation, unless the PrePenalty Notice was served upon the
alleged violator in care of the
representative.
§ 576.703
Penalty imposition.
If, after considering any written
response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and
any relevant facts, the Office of Foreign
Assets Control determines that there
was a violation by the alleged violator
named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and
that a civil monetary penalty is
appropriate, the Office of Foreign Assets
Control may issue a Penalty Notice to
the violator containing a determination
of the violation and the imposition of
the monetary penalty. For additional
details concerning issuance of a Penalty
Notice, see Appendix A to part 501 of
this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty
Notice shall constitute final agency
action. The violator has the right to seek
judicial review of that final agency
action in federal district court.
§ 576.704 Administrative collection;
referral to United States Department of
Justice.
In the event that the violator does not
pay the penalty imposed pursuant to
this part or make payment arrangements
acceptable to the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, the matter may be
referred for administrative collection
measures by the Department of the
Treasury or to the United States
Department of Justice for appropriate
action to recover the penalty in a civil
suit in a federal district court.
Subpart I—Paperwork Reduction Act
§ 576.901
Paperwork Reduction Act notice.
For approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507) of information
collections relating to recordkeeping
and reporting requirements, licensing
procedures (including those pursuant to
statements of licensing policy), and
other procedures, see 501.901 of this
chapter. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control
number assigned by OMB.
Dated: September 1, 2010.
Adam J. Szubin,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control,
Department of the Treasury.
Approved: September 2, 2010.
Stuart A. Levey,
Under Secretary, Office of Terrorism and
Financial Intelligence, Department of the
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2010–22546 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
Subpart H—Procedures
§ 576.801
Secretary of the Treasury has delegated
the authority so to act.
(b) Unless otherwise delegated, the
authority provided in section 2 of
Executive Order 13315 to confiscate
property blocked pursuant to this part
and transfer all vested right, title, and
interest in such property to the
Development Fund for Iraq shall be
exercised only by the Secretary of the
Treasury, in consultation with the
Secretary of State.
Procedures.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 576.802 Delegation by the Secretary of
the Treasury.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
For license application procedures
and procedures relating to amendments,
modifications, or revocations of
licenses; administrative decisions;
rulemaking; and requests for documents
pursuant to the Freedom of Information
and Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552 and
552a), see part 501, subpart E, of this
chapter.
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Pequonnock River, Bridgeport, CT
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, any action that the
Secretary of the Treasury is authorized
to take pursuant to Executive Order
13303 of May 22, 2003, and any
subsequent Executive orders relating to
the national emergency declared
therein, including but not limited to
Executive Order 13315 of August 28,
2003, and Executive Order 13438 of July
17, 2007, may be taken by the Director
of the Office of Foreign Assets Control
or by any other person to whom the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0787]
RIN 1625–AA09
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is removing
the drawbridge operation regulations
that govern the operation of two bridges,
the Congress Street Bridge at mile 0.4,
and the Grand Street Bridge at mile 0.9,
across the Pequonnock River at
Bridgeport, Connecticut. This final rule
removes the regulations for the two
bridges because the draw spans of the
bridges have been removed.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55475
This rule is effective September
13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2010–
0787 and are available by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0787 in the ‘‘keyword’’ box,
and then clicking ‘‘search.’’ This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project
Officer, First Coast Guard District Bridge
Branch, 212–668–7165,
judy.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because we are
removing the operation regulations for
two moveable draw bridges that no
longer have moveable spans.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The drawbridges listed under
the regulations we are removing no
longer have moveable spans; therefore,
the drawbridge operation regulations are
no longer necessary.
Background and Purpose
The drawbridge operation regulations
for the Congress Street Bridge at mile
0.4, and the Grand Street Bridge at mile
0.9, across the Pequonnock River at
Bridgeport, Connecticut, are listed at 33
CFR 117.219(d) and 33 CFR 117.219(f).
The moveable span at the Congress
Street Bridge was removed due to
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
55476
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
deterioration but the approach spans
have been retained for a future bridge
replacement. The Grand Street Bridge
was demolished in its entirety in 2000.
The Coast Guard, as a result, is
removing the drawbridge operation
regulations for the above bridges
because they are no longer applicable or
necessary since the moveable spans
have been removed.
Discussion of Rule
This final rule removes the
drawbridge operation regulations listed
at 33 CFR 117.219(d) that govern the
operation of the Congress Street Bridge
at mile 0.4, and 33 CFR 117.219(f) that
govern the operation of the Grand Street
Bridge at mile 0.9, both across the
Pequonnock River at Bridgeport,
Connecticut. The moveable spans for
both bridges were removed and the
drawbridge operation regulations are no
longer necessary as a result.
Paragraph (a) stating that public
vessels of the United States must be
passed as soon as possible, will also be
removed by this final rule because it is
now listed at 33 CFR 117.31, under
Subpart A, General Requirements.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. This conclusion is based upon
the fact that we are removing
regulations that are no longer applicable
or necessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based upon the fact
that we are removing regulations that
are no longer applicable or necessary.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so they can
better evaluate its effect on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have a
taking implication under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
signal or after one prolonged blast
followed by two short blasts, if at least
a twenty four hour notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
Dated: August 27, 2010.
Daniel A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–22749 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
33 CFR Part 165
■
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
RIN 1625–AA00
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
Safety Zone; Revolution 3 Triathlon,
Lake Erie & Sandusky Bay, Cedar
Point, OH
■
2. Revise § 117.219 to read as follows:
§ 117.219
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0791]
ACTION:
Pequonnock River.
(a) The draw of the Stratford Avenue
Bridge at mile 0.1, at Bridgeport, shall
open on signal; except that, from 6:45
a.m. to 7:15 a.m., 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m.,
11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and 4:30 p.m.
to 6:10 p.m., the draw need not open for
the passage of vessel traffic. From
December 1 through March 31, from 8
p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall open on
signal if at least a six-hour notice is
given by calling the number posted at
the bridge.
(b) The draw of the Metro-North Peck
Bridge at mile 0.3, at Bridgeport, shall
open on signal or after three blasts as
follows:
(1) From 5:45 a.m. to 9 p.m. except:
(i) From Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays or emergencies, the
draw need not be opened from 6:45 a.m.
to 7:15 a.m., 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m., and
4:30 p.m. to 6:10 p.m.
(ii) From Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays or emergencies, the
draw need not be opened more than
once during the periods from 5:45 a.m.
to 6:45 a.m., 7:15 a.m. to 7:45 a.m., 8:15
a.m. to 9 a.m., and 6:10 p.m. to 8:15
p.m.
(2) From 9 p.m. to 5:45 a.m., the draw
shall open on signal if at least an eighthour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
(3) The draw need not open on signal
if a train is approaching so closely that
it may not be safely stopped; however,
any delay in opening the draw shall not
exceed seven minutes from the time the
request to open is received.
(c) The draw of the East Washington
Street Bridge at mile 0.6, shall open on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Erie and Sandusky Bay near Cedar
Point, Ohio. The safety zone is intended
to restrict vessels from portions of the
Lake Erie during the Revolution 3 Cedar
Point Triathlon. The temporary safety
zone is necessary to protect participants
of the swim portion of the triathlon race
from potential hazards from vessels
operating in the area.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30
a.m. through 9:30 a.m. on September 12,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0791 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0791 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or e-mail MSTC Benjamin
Wagner, Response Department, Marine
Safety Unit Toledo, Coast Guard;
telephone (419) 418–6008,
Benjamin.D.Wagner@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55477
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when an agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under U.S.C. 553
(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because publishing
an NPRM is impractical as the Coast
Guard did not receive notification of the
final details of this event in sufficient
time to issue an NPRM without delaying
this rulemaking. A delay or cancellation
of the event in order to allow for a
notice and comment period is contrary
to the public interest because of the
hazards associated with vessel operation
in close proximity to swimming
participants. For the same reasons under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. In
addition, to the reasons stated above,
this rule is intended to ensure the safety
of the event participants, spectators, and
other waterway users; thus any delay in
the rule’s effective date is impractical.
Background and Purpose
The temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of
participants of the swim portion of a
triathlon race as well as the safety of
mariners operating in the vicinity of the
triathlon. Establishing this temporary
safety zone to control vessel movement
around the location of the triathlon
swim event will help ensure the safety
of persons and property at the event and
help minimize any potential risks
associated with the event.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone. The safety zone
will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. through
9:30 a.m. on September 12, 2010. This
safety zone will encompass all waters of
Lake Erie within the geographic area
bounded by the following coordinates:
starting at position 41°29′06″ N,
082°40′56″ W; then extending northeast
to position 41°29′37″ N, 082°40′14″ W;
then extending southeast to position
41°29′14″ N, 082°39′52″ W; then
extending southwest to position
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55475-55477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22749]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0787]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Pequonnock River, Bridgeport, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the drawbridge operation
regulations that govern the operation of two bridges, the Congress
Street Bridge at mile 0.4, and the Grand Street Bridge at mile 0.9,
across the Pequonnock River at Bridgeport, Connecticut. This final rule
removes the regulations for the two bridges because the draw spans of
the bridges have been removed.
DATES: This rule is effective September 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket USCG-2010-0787 and are available by
going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0787 in the
``keyword'' box, and then clicking ``search.'' This material is also
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch, 212-668-7165, judy.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because we are removing the operation
regulations for two moveable draw bridges that no longer have moveable
spans.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The drawbridges listed under the
regulations we are removing no longer have moveable spans; therefore,
the drawbridge operation regulations are no longer necessary.
Background and Purpose
The drawbridge operation regulations for the Congress Street Bridge
at mile 0.4, and the Grand Street Bridge at mile 0.9, across the
Pequonnock River at Bridgeport, Connecticut, are listed at 33 CFR
117.219(d) and 33 CFR 117.219(f).
The moveable span at the Congress Street Bridge was removed due to
[[Page 55476]]
deterioration but the approach spans have been retained for a future
bridge replacement. The Grand Street Bridge was demolished in its
entirety in 2000.
The Coast Guard, as a result, is removing the drawbridge operation
regulations for the above bridges because they are no longer applicable
or necessary since the moveable spans have been removed.
Discussion of Rule
This final rule removes the drawbridge operation regulations listed
at 33 CFR 117.219(d) that govern the operation of the Congress Street
Bridge at mile 0.4, and 33 CFR 117.219(f) that govern the operation of
the Grand Street Bridge at mile 0.9, both across the Pequonnock River
at Bridgeport, Connecticut. The moveable spans for both bridges were
removed and the drawbridge operation regulations are no longer
necessary as a result.
Paragraph (a) stating that public vessels of the United States must
be passed as soon as possible, will also be removed by this final rule
because it is now listed at 33 CFR 117.31, under Subpart A, General
Requirements.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. This conclusion is based upon the fact
that we are removing regulations that are no longer applicable or
necessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This conclusion is based upon the fact that we are removing
regulations that are no longer applicable or necessary.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so they can better evaluate its
effect on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have a taking implication under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one
[[Page 55477]]
of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.219 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.219 Pequonnock River.
(a) The draw of the Stratford Avenue Bridge at mile 0.1, at
Bridgeport, shall open on signal; except that, from 6:45 a.m. to 7:15
a.m., 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m., 11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and 4:30 p.m. to
6:10 p.m., the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
From December 1 through March 31, from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall
open on signal if at least a six-hour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
(b) The draw of the Metro-North Peck Bridge at mile 0.3, at
Bridgeport, shall open on signal or after three blasts as follows:
(1) From 5:45 a.m. to 9 p.m. except:
(i) From Monday through Friday, excluding holidays or emergencies,
the draw need not be opened from 6:45 a.m. to 7:15 a.m., 7:45 a.m. to
8:15 a.m., and 4:30 p.m. to 6:10 p.m.
(ii) From Monday through Friday, excluding holidays or emergencies,
the draw need not be opened more than once during the periods from 5:45
a.m. to 6:45 a.m., 7:15 a.m. to 7:45 a.m., 8:15 a.m. to 9 a.m., and
6:10 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
(2) From 9 p.m. to 5:45 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at
least an eight-hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
(3) The draw need not open on signal if a train is approaching so
closely that it may not be safely stopped; however, any delay in
opening the draw shall not exceed seven minutes from the time the
request to open is received.
(c) The draw of the East Washington Street Bridge at mile 0.6,
shall open on signal or after one prolonged blast followed by two short
blasts, if at least a twenty four hour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Dated: August 27, 2010.
Daniel A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-22749 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P