Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota; Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limited Maintenance Plan for the Twin Cities Area, 54805-54806 [2010-22339]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 174 / Thursday, September 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209–
3939).
The meetings will be conducted in an
informal manner. Presenters and
attendees may provide written
information to the court reporter for
inclusion in the rulemaking record.
MSHA will make transcripts of the
meetings available on MSHA’s Web site
https://www.msha.gov, and include them
in the rulemaking record.
The meetings will be held on the
following dates at the locations
indicated:
Date
Location
October 8, 2010 ........................................
MSHA National Office, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, 25th Floor Conference Room,
Arlington, VA 22209.
Embassy Suites Sacramento-Riverwalk Promenade, 100 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Omni William Penn Hotel, 530 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 .......
October 12, 2010 ......................................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
October 14, 2010 ......................................
MSHA has reviewed a number of
guidelines for safety and health
management programs, including:
• The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s (OSHA’s) Voluntary
Protection Program and its Safety and
Health Program Management
Guidelines;
• The American National Standards
Institute’s (ANSI’s) and American
Industrial Hygiene Association’s
(AIHA’s) ANSI/AIHA’s Z10–2005,
Occupational Health and Safety
Management Systems;
• The International Standards
Organization’s (ISO’s) ISO 9001:2008
(E), Quality management systems—
Requirements; and
• The British Standards Institution’s
(BSI’s) BS OHSAS 18001:2007,
Occupational Health and Safety
Assessment Series, Occupational health
and safety management systems—
Requirements.
The Guidelines reveal that the
components of effective safety and
health management programs generally
include:
1. Management Commitment.
2. Worker Involvement.
3. Hazard Identification, including
workplace inspections for violations of
mandatory health and safety standards.
4. Hazard Prevention and Control.
5. Safety and Health Training.
6. Program Evaluation.
Year after year, many companies
experience low injury and illness rates
and low violation rates. For these
companies, preventing harm to their
workers is more than compliance with
safety and health requirements; it
reflects the embodiment of a culture of
safety—from the CEO to the worker to
the contractor. This culture of safety
derives from a commitment to a
systematic, effective, comprehensive
safety and health management program,
implemented with the full participation
of all workers. MSHA understands that
many companies have developed and
implemented effective safety and health
management programs. At the meetings,
you will hear about some of these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Sep 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
programs. The Agency is interested in
receiving comments on all aspects of
safety and health management
programs.
MSHA will accept written comments
and information for the record from any
interested party, including those not
presenting oral statements.
Dated: September 2, 2010.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor, for Mine Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–22403 Filed 9–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0556; FRL–9198–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Minnesota; Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Limited Maintenance Plan for the Twin
Cities Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a request submitted by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on
June 16, 2010, to revise the Minnesota
State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
carbon monoxide (CO) under the Clean
Air Act (CAA). The State has submitted
a limited maintenance plan for CO
showing continued attainment of the CO
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) in the Minneapolis-St. Paul
(Twin Cities) area. The one hour CO
NAAQS and eight hour CO NAAQS are
35 parts per million (ppm), and 9 ppm,
respectively. This limited maintenance
plan satisfies section 175A of the CAA,
and is in accordance with EPA’s
October 29, 1999, approval of the State’s
redesignation request and maintenance
plan for the Twin Cities area.
Additionally, this limited maintenance
plan for CO satisfies the requirements
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54805
Contact number
(202) 693–9440
(916) 326–5000
(412) 281–7100
contained in the October 6, 1995, EPA
memorandum entitled ‘‘Limited
Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment
Areas.’’
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0556, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: bortzer.jay@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2054.
4. Mail: Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Jay Bortzer, Chief,
Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Final Rules section of
this Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Air Planning and Maintenance Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0258,
chang.andy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
54806
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 174 / Thursday, September 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: August 26, 2010.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010–22339 Filed 9–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0715; FRL–9200–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans—Maricopa
County (Phoenix) PM–10
Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan
for Attainment of the 24-Hour PM–10
Standard; Clean Air Act Section 189(d)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve in part
and disapprove in part State
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Arizona to
meet the Clean Air Act (CAA)
requirements applicable to the serious
Maricopa County (Phoenix)
nonattainment area (Maricopa area).
These requirements apply to the
Maricopa area following EPA’s June 6,
2007 finding that the area failed to meet
its December 31, 2006 serious area
deadline to attain the national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10). Under CAA section 189(d),
Arizona was required to submit a plan
by December 31, 2007 providing for
expeditious attainment of the PM–10
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Sep 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
NAAQS and for an annual emission
reduction in PM–10 or PM–10
precursors of not less than five percent
per year until attainment (189(d) plan).
EPA is proposing to disapprove
provisions of the 189(d) plan for the
Maricopa area because they do not meet
applicable CAA requirements for
emissions inventories as well as for
attainment, five percent annual
emission reductions, reasonable further
progress and milestones, and
contingency measures. EPA is also
proposing to disapprove the 2010 motor
vehicle emission budget in the 189(d)
plan as not meeting the requirements of
CAA section 176(c) and 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). EPA is also proposing a
limited approval and limited
disapproval of State regulations for the
control of PM–10 from agricultural
sources. Finally, EPA is proposing to
approve various provisions of State
statutes relating to the control of PM–10
emissions in the Maricopa area.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
October 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2010–0715, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: nudd.gregory@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Gregory Nudd (Air2), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Nudd, U.S. EPA Region 9, 415–
947–4107, nudd.gregory@epa.gov or
https://www.epa.gov/region09/air/
actions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ mean U.S. EPA.
Table of Contents
I. PM–10 Air Quality Planning in the
Maricopa Area
II. Overview of Applicable CAA
Requirements
III. Evaluation of the 189(d) Plan’s
Compliance With CAA Requirements
IV. Summary of Proposed Actions
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. PM–10 Air Quality Planning in the
Maricopa Area
The NAAQS are standards for certain
ambient air pollutants set by EPA to
protect public health and welfare. PM–
10 is among the ambient air pollutants
for which EPA has established healthbased standards. PM–10 causes adverse
health effects by penetrating deep in the
lungs, aggravating the cardiopulmonary
system. Children, the elderly, and
people with asthma and heart
conditions are the most vulnerable.
On July 1, 1987 EPA revised the
health-based national ambient air
quality standards (52 FR 24672),
replacing the standards for total
suspended particulates with new
standards applying only to particulate
matter up to ten microns in diameter
(PM–10). At that time, EPA established
two PM–10 standards, annual standards
and 24-hour standards. Effective
December 18, 2006, EPA revoked the
annual PM–10 standards but retained
the 24-hour PM–10 standards. 71 FR
61144 (October 17, 2006). The 24-hour
PM–10 standards of 150 micrograms per
cubic meter (μg/m3) are attained when
the expected number of days per
calendar year with a 24-hour average
concentration above 150 μg/m3, as
determined in accordance with
appendix K to 40 CFR part 50, is equal
to or less than one. 40 CFR 50.6 and 40
CFR part 50, appendix K.
On the date of enactment of the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments (CAA or the
E:\FR\FM\09SEP1.SGM
09SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 174 (Thursday, September 9, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54805-54806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22339]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0556; FRL-9198-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Minnesota; Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limited Maintenance Plan for the Twin
Cities Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a request submitted by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on June 16, 2010, to revise
the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) for carbon monoxide (CO)
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State has submitted a limited
maintenance plan for CO showing continued attainment of the CO National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the Minneapolis-St. Paul (Twin
Cities) area. The one hour CO NAAQS and eight hour CO NAAQS are 35
parts per million (ppm), and 9 ppm, respectively. This limited
maintenance plan satisfies section 175A of the CAA, and is in
accordance with EPA's October 29, 1999, approval of the State's
redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Twin Cities area.
Additionally, this limited maintenance plan for CO satisfies the
requirements contained in the October 6, 1995, EPA memorandum entitled
``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment
Areas.''
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0556, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: bortzer.jay@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2054.
4. Mail: Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Final
Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how
to submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Air Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-0258, chang.andy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial
[[Page 54806]]
submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: August 26, 2010.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010-22339 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P