Notice of Debarment Pursuant to Section 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 54692-54694 [2010-22357]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
54692
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices
For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julie
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: September 1, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–22358 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
´
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Miro:
The Dutch Interiors’’
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Notice, correction.
On August 11, 2010, notice
was published on page 48736 of the
Federal Register (volume 75, number
154) of determination made by the
Department of State pertaining to the
´
exhibit ’’Miro: The Dutch Interiors.’’ The
reference notice is corrected to
accommodate an additional object to be
included in the exhibition. Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, and Delegation of
Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000,
I hereby determine that the additional
object to be included in the exhibition
´
‘‘Miro: The Dutch Interiors,’’ imported
from abroad for temporary exhibition
within the United States, is of cultural
significance. The additional object is
imported pursuant to a loan agreement
with the foreign owner or custodian. I
also determine that the exhibition or
display of the additional exhibit object
at The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York, NY, from on or about
October 4, 2010, until on or about
January 17, 2011, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
SUMMARY:
[Public Notice: 7155]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Van
´
Gogh, Gauguin, Cezanne, and Beyond:
Post-Impressionist Masterpieces From
´
the Musee d’Orsay’’
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, and Delegation of
Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000,
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Van Gogh,
´
Gauguin, Cezanne, and Beyond: PostImpressionist Masterpieces from the
´
Musee d’Orsay,’’ imported from abroad
for temporary exhibition within the
United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to a loan agreement with the
foreign owner or custodian. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at the Fine Arts
Museums of San Francisco, San
Francisco, CA, from on or about
September 25, 2010, until on or about
January 18, 2011, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julie
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
SUMMARY:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–22359 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
[Public Notice 7151]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
16:41 Sep 07, 2010
Dated: September 1, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[Public Notice 7157]
[FR Doc. 2010–22362 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: September 1, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
Jkt 220001
For
further information, including a list of
the additional exhibit object, contact
Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Debarment Pursuant to
Section 127.7(c) of the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations
Title: Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs; Statutory Debarment under the
Arms Export Control Act and the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations.
ACTION: Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has imposed
statutory debarment pursuant to
§ 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR
parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted
of violating or attempting to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended (‘‘AECA’’), (22 U.S.C.
2778).
DATES: Effective Date: Date of conviction
as specified for each person.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Studtmann, Director, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State (202) 663–2980.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of
State from issuing licenses or other
approvals for the export of defense
articles or defense services where the
applicant, or any party to the export, has
been convicted of violating certain
statutes, including the AECA. The
statute permits limited exceptions to be
made on a case-by-case basis. In
implementing this provision, Section
127.7 of the ITAR provides for ‘‘statutory
debarment’’ of any person who has been
convicted of violating or conspiring to
violate the AECA. Persons subject to
statutory debarment are prohibited from
participating directly or indirectly in the
export of defense articles, including
technical data, or in the furnishing of
defense services for which a license or
other approval is required.
Statutory debarment is based solely
upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United
States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not
applicable.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices
The period for debarment will be
determined by the Assistant Secretary
for Political-Military Affairs based on
the underlying nature of the violations,
but will generally be for three years
from the date of conviction. At the end
of the debarment period, export
privileges may be reinstated only at the
request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the
conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns,
as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA. Unless export privileges are
reinstated, however, the person remains
debarred.
Department of State policy permits
debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement
beginning one year after the date of the
debarment. Any decision to grant
reinstatement can be made only after the
statutory requirements of Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA have been
satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction
exceptions, may be made to this
debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with
the appropriate U.S. agencies. However,
such an exception would be granted
only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular
attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by
overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an
exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are
consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United
States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent
with the foreign policy or national
security interests of the United States,
and that do not conflict with law
enforcement concerns. Even if
exceptions are granted, the debarment
continues until subsequent
reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR,
the following persons are statutorily
debarred as of the date of their AECA
conviction (Name, Date of Conviction,
District, Case No., Date of Birth):
(1) Arick Andre Dube, April 1, 2010,
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Alabama, Case # 1:09–
CR–00187–001, June 10, 1981.
(2) Juan Lopez-Hernandez, April 6,
2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
District of Alabama, Case # 1:09–
CR–00187–002, March 16, 1968.
(3) Charles Michael Cartwright, April
18, 2010, U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona, Case # CR–08–
01197–002, October 13, 1988.
(4) Kasey Ray Davis, April 18, 2010,
U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case # CR–08–01197–010,
December 9, 1989.
(5) Adam Wyatt Fuentes, April 18,
2010, U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case # CR–08–01197–003,
November 23, 1983.
(6) Andrew Allen Wild, April 18,
2010, U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case # CR–08–01197–013,
June 28, 1986.
(7) Ian Alexander Witte, April 18,
2010, U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case # CR–08–01197–011,
November 1, 1990.
(8) Rocky Mountain Instrument
Company, August 20, 2010, U.S.
District Court, District of Colorado,
Case # 1:10–CR–00139.
(9) Amir Hossein Ardebili (aka Amir
Ahkami, Alex Dave, Arash Koren),
December 14, 2009, U.S. District
Court, District of Delaware, Case #s
1:07–CR–155–01 and 1:08–CR–73–
01, July 3, 1974.
(10) Baktash Fattahi, July 20, 2010,
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida, Case # 1:09–
20298–CR–SEITZ(s)-3, June 26,
1972.
(11) Desmond Dinesh Frank, August
28, 2008, U.S. District Court,
District of Massachusetts, Case #
1:07–CR–10382, December 28,
1977.
(12) Yen Ching Peng (aka Alex Peng,
Yen-Yo Peng), U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, Case
# 1:07–cr–01214–01, March 15,
1976.
(13) Atmospheric Glow Technologies,
Inc., February 18, 2010, U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of
Tennessee, Case # 3:08–CR–69–002.
(14) Roberto Aaron Velasco-Tamez,
March 3, 2009, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case #
7:08–CR–00892–001, March 29,
1988.
(15) Raul Calvillo-Colunga, February
15, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case #
7:08–CR–01415–002, February 18,
1990.
(16) Erick Gerardo Martinez-Martinez,
February 16, 2010, U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas,
Case # 7:09–CR–00713–001,
November 20, 1988.
(17) Aaron De Leon, February 16,
2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54693
District of Texas, Case # 7:09–CR–
01089–001, November 21, 1988.
(18) Rodolfo Palacios, Jr., February 10,
2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case # 7:09–CR–
01249–001, July 25, 1991.
(19) Armando Bazan, May 1, 2010,
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case # 7:09–CR–
01316–001, October 4, 1963.
(20) Cesar Canales, May 1, 2010, U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Texas, Case # 7:09–CR–01316–002,
December 14, 1958.
(21) Francisco Reyes-Martinez, March
30, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case #
1:09–CR–01434–001, February 5,
1971.
(22) Pablo Leyva-Angiano, July 19,
2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case # 7:10–CR–
00179–001, March 7, 1983.
(23) Ramon Andrade, Jr., July 14, 2010,
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case # 7:10–CR–
00346–001, July 24, 1970.
(24) Caro-Dominguez, Jaime Omar,
June 23, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Western District of Texas, Case #
4:10–cr–004–01, August 30, 1998.
As noted above, at the end of the
three-year period following the date of
conviction, the above named persons/
entities remain debarred unless export
privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally
ineligible to participate in activity
regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the
ITAR, any person who has knowledge
that another person is subject to
debarment or is otherwise ineligible
may not, without disclosure to and
written approval from the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in
which such ineligible person may
benefit there from or have a direct or
indirect interest therein.
This notice is provided for purposes
of making the public aware that the
persons listed above are prohibited from
participating directly or indirectly in
activities regulated by the ITAR,
including any brokering activities and
in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense
articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations
covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District
Courts mentioned above and by citing
the court case number where provided.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
54694
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Notices
Dated: August 31, 2010.
Thomas M. Countryman,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2010–22357 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Availability of a
Supplemental Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the DesertXpress
High-Speed Passenger Rail Project
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), United States
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
FRA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that a Supplemental
Draft EIS has been prepared for the
DesertXpress High-Speed Passenger
Train Project (Project). FRA is the lead
agency for the environmental review
process and has prepared the
Supplemental Draft EIS consistent with
the provisions of Section 102(2)(c) of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
the Counsel of Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA
(40 CFR parts 1500 et seq.) and FRA’s
Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545;
May 26, 1999).
DesertXpress Enterprises Inc., the
Project proponent, proposes to construct
and operate a fully grade-separated,
dedicated double-track, passenger-only
railroad along an approximately 200mile corridor, from Victorville, CA, to
Las Vegas, NV. After publication of the
Draft EIS and in response to substantive
comments submitted by interested
agencies and the public, the Project
proponent proposed several project
modifications and additions. After
reviewing the proposed project
modifications and additions, FRA
determined a Supplemental Draft EIS
describing the potential environmental
effects of the modifications and
additions was necessary to fulfill its
responsibility under NEPA.
DATES: Written comments on the
Supplemental Draft EIS for the
DesertXpress Project should be provided
to FRA on or before October 18 2010.
Public hearings are scheduled on
October 13 and October 14, 2010, at the
times and dates listed in the Addresses
Section below in Las Vegas, NV and
Barstow, CA.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Written comments on the
Supplemental Draft EIS should be sent
to Ms. Wendy Messenger,
Environmental Protection Specialist,
Office of Railroad Policy and
Development, ATTN: DesertXpress EIS,
Federal Railroad Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., MS–20,
Washington, DC 20590 or via e-mail
with the subject line DesertXpress EIS to
Wendy.Messenger@dot.gov. Comments
may also be provided orally or in
writing at the public hearings scheduled
at the following locations:
• Las Vegas, NV, Wednesday, October
13, 2010, 5:30 to 8 p. m., Hampton Inn
Tropicana, SW. Event Center B, 4975
Dean Martin Drive, Las Vegas, NV; and
• Barstow, CA, Thursday, October 14,
2010, 5:30 to 8 p.m., Lenwood Hampton
Inn, Jackrabbit Room 1, 2710 Lenwood
Road, Barstow, CA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Wendy Messenger, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, Federal
Railroad Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., MS–20,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: 202–
493–6396).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following
the March 18, 2009 publication of the
Draft EIS on the Project, several project
modifications and additions were
proposed to address substantive
comments received during public and
agency review of the Draft EIS and to
reduce or avoid significant
environmental effects. After evaluating
the proposed project modifications and
additions, FRA determined, pursuant to
40 CFR 1502.9, that it was necessary to
prepare a supplement to the Draft EIS
analyzing the potential environmental
impacts that might result from those
modifications and additions. Therefore,
in compliance with CEQ’s regulations
and FRA’s Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts, FRA, in
cooperation with the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Surface
Transportation Board (STB), Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), and
the National Park Service (NPS), and
with the added participation of the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) and the Nevada Department
of Transportation (NDOT), prepared a
Supplemental Draft EIS.
The Project would involve the
construction and operation of an
interstate high-speed passenger train
system between Victorville, CA and Las
Vegas, NV, along an approximately 200mile corridor. The project proponent
proposes to construct nearly the entire
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
fully grade-separated, dedicated doubletrack, passenger-only railroad either in
the median of, or immediately
alongside, Interstate-15 (I–15).
The proposed project modifications
and additions do not in any way change
the underlying purpose of, or need for,
the project. The need for high-speed
passenger rail service arises from several
factors, including high and increasing
travel demand with limited increases in
capacity on I–15, constraints to the
expansion of air travel, and frequent
highway vehicle accidents on the I–15
corridor. The DesertXpress high-speed
passenger train is intended to provide
reliable and safe passenger rail
transportation using proven high-speed
rail technology that would be a
convenient alternative to automobile
travel on I–15 or air travel to and from
Las Vegas, and that would add
transportation capacity along the I–15
corridor.
Consistent with the requirements of
NEPA, the Supplemental Draft EIS
evaluates the environmental effects of
the proposed modifications and
additions, which include a new
Victorville passenger station option at
Dale Evans Parkway, a rail alignment
through the Barstow area following the
I–15 freeway corridor from Lenwood
through Yermo, CA, a new rail
alignment through the Clark Mountains
near the Mojave National Preserve, new
sites for maintenance and operation
facilities in unincorporated Clark
County, NV, relocation of portions of
the rail alignment in metropolitan Las
Vegas from the immediate I–15 corridor
to the Industrial Road/Dean Martin
Drive corridor, and several alignment
modifications to reduce or avoid
environmental impacts, improve
operating characteristics, or avoid
conflicts with other planned projects.
Copies of both the Supplemental Draft
EIS and Draft EIS are available online at
FRA’s Web site: https://www.fra.dot.gov;
they are also available for viewing at the
following locations near the planned
rail system:
• Victorville City Library, 15011
Circle Drive, Victorville, CA 92395;
• Barstow Library, 304 East Buena
Vista, Barstow, CA 92311;
• Clark County Library, 1401 E.
Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119;
and
• Las Vegas Library, 833 Las Vegas
Blvd. N., Las Vegas, NV 80101.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54692-54694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22357]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7151]
Notice of Debarment Pursuant to Section 127.7(c) of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations
Title: Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment
under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has
imposed statutory debarment pursuant to Sec. 127.7(c) of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (``ITAR'') (22 CFR parts 120
to 130) on persons convicted of violating or attempting to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (``AECA''), (22
U.S.C. 2778).
DATES: Effective Date: Date of conviction as specified for each person.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Studtmann, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, Department of State (202) 663-2980.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or
other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services
where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of
violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits
limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing
this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ``statutory
debarment'' of any person who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment
are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export
of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of
defense services for which a license or other approval is required.
Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR
are not applicable.
[[Page 54693]]
The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant
Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature
of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date
of conviction. At the end of the debarment period, export privileges
may be reinstated only at the request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to mitigate any law enforcement
concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA. Unless export
privileges are reinstated, however, the person remains debarred.
Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for
reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any
decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory
requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to
this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion
of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs,
after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an
exception would be granted only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United States; or whether other
compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign
policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do
not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are
granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of
the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date
of their AECA conviction (Name, Date of Conviction, District, Case No.,
Date of Birth):
(1) Arick Andre Dube, April 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Alabama, Case 1:09-CR-00187-001, June 10, 1981.
(2) Juan Lopez-Hernandez, April 6, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Alabama, Case 1:09-CR-00187-002, March 16, 1968.
(3) Charles Michael Cartwright, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona, Case CR-08-01197-002, October 13, 1988.
(4) Kasey Ray Davis, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case CR-08-01197-010, December 9, 1989.
(5) Adam Wyatt Fuentes, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District
of Arizona, Case CR-08-01197-003, November 23, 1983.
(6) Andrew Allen Wild, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona, Case CR-08-01197-013, June 28, 1986.
(7) Ian Alexander Witte, April 18, 2010, U.S. District Court, District
of Arizona, Case CR-08-01197-011, November 1, 1990.
(8) Rocky Mountain Instrument Company, August 20, 2010, U.S. District
Court, District of Colorado, Case 1:10-CR-00139.
(9) Amir Hossein Ardebili (aka Amir Ahkami, Alex Dave, Arash Koren),
December 14, 2009, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case
s 1:07-CR-155-01 and 1:08-CR-73-01, July 3, 1974.
(10) Baktash Fattahi, July 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida, Case 1:09-20298-CR-SEITZ(s)-3, June 26,
1972.
(11) Desmond Dinesh Frank, August 28, 2008, U.S. District Court,
District of Massachusetts, Case 1:07-CR-10382, December 28,
1977.
(12) Yen Ching Peng (aka Alex Peng, Yen-Yo Peng), U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, Case 1:07-cr-01214-01, March
15, 1976.
(13) Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc., February 18, 2010, U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee, Case 3:08-CR-
69-002.
(14) Roberto Aaron Velasco-Tamez, March 3, 2009, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case 7:08-CR-00892-001, March 29,
1988.
(15) Raul Calvillo-Colunga, February 15, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case 7:08-CR-01415-002, February
18, 1990.
(16) Erick Gerardo Martinez-Martinez, February 16, 2010, U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas, Case 7:09-CR-00713-001,
November 20, 1988.
(17) Aaron De Leon, February 16, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case 7:09-CR-01089-001, November 21, 1988.
(18) Rodolfo Palacios, Jr., February 10, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case 7:09-CR-01249-001, July 25,
1991.
(19) Armando Bazan, May 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District
of Texas, Case 7:09-CR-01316-001, October 4, 1963.
(20) Cesar Canales, May 1, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern District
of Texas, Case 7:09-CR-01316-002, December 14, 1958.
(21) Francisco Reyes-Martinez, March 30, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Case 1:09-CR-01434-001, February
5, 1971.
(22) Pablo Leyva-Angiano, July 19, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case 7:10-CR-00179-001, March 7, 1983.
(23) Ramon Andrade, Jr., July 14, 2010, U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Case 7:10-CR-00346-001, July 24, 1970.
(24) Caro-Dominguez, Jaime Omar, June 23, 2010, U.S. District Court,
Western District of Texas, Case 4:10-cr-004-01, August 30,
1998.
As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the
date of conviction, the above named persons/entities remain debarred
unless export privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d),
and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person
who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is
otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written
approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person
may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.
This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware
that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating
directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including
any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S.
District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number
where provided.
[[Page 54694]]
Dated: August 31, 2010.
Thomas M. Countryman,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-22357 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
