Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F Series and 912 S Series Reciprocating Engines, 54462-54464 [2010-22147]
Download as PDF
54462
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
determined by USDA to be rustresistant.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Dates
We are publishing this rule without a
prior proposal because we view this
action as noncontroversial and
anticipate no adverse public comment.
This rule will be effective, as published
in this document, on November 8, 2010,
unless we receive written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to
submit adverse comments on or before
October 8, 2010.
Adverse comments are comments that
suggest the rule should not be adopted
or that suggest the rule should be
changed.
If we receive written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to
submit adverse comments, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing this rule before
the effective date. We will then publish
a proposed rule for public comment.
As discussed above, if we receive no
written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse
comments within 30 days of publication
of this direct final rule, this direct final
rule will become effective 60 days
following its publication. We will
publish a document in the Federal
Register, before the effective date of this
direct final rule, confirming that it is
effective on the date indicated in this
document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule is subject to Executive Order
12866. However, for this action, the
Office of Management and Budget has
waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
This analysis provides the basis, as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, for certification by the APHIS
Administrator that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule will amend 7
CFR 301.38-2 by adding four varieties to
the list of rust-resistant Berberis species
or cultivars. The nursery and
floriculture industries that may be
affected by this rule are largely
composed of small entities. We expect
these entities to benefit from the rule, by
being able to market interstate barberry
species and cultivars that have been
determined to be rust-resistant.
The introduction and spread of plant
pests can result in damage to crops and
losses to the U.S. agricultural sector. For
the purpose of this analysis and
following the Small Business
Administration (SBA) guidelines, we
note that a major segment of entities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:27 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
potentially affected by this rule are
classified within the following
industries: Nursery and Tree Production
(NAICS 111421), and Floriculture
Production (NAICS 111422). According
to the Census of Agriculture, these two
categories included 52,845 farms in
2007, and represented 3 percent of all
farms in the United States. These
entities are considered small by SBA
standards if their annual sales are
$750,000 or less. Over 93 percent of the
farms in these industries had annual
sales of less than $500,000. Barberry
plants are not one of the crops tracked
by the Census and therefore data on
production and number of producers are
not available. Nurseries producing
barberry plant species and cultivars will
not be negatively affected. In fact, they
will benefit from being able to market
the four varieties interstate. In addition,
the rule does not require any additional
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance measures beyond what is
already in place.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 77817786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec.
204, Title II, Public Law 106-113, 113
Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and
301.75-16 issued under Sec. 203, Title
II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400 (7
U.S.C. 1421 note).
■ 2. In § 301.38-2, paragraph (a)(1) is
amended by adding, in alphabetical
order, four rust-resistant Berberis
species to read as follows.
§ 301.38-2
Regulated articles.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
B. thunbergii ‘24kagozam’ (24 Karat
GoldTM)
*
*
*
*
*
B. thunbergii ‘Grhozam’ (Green
HornetTM)
*
*
*
*
*
B. thunbergii ‘Pyruzam’ (Pygmy
RubyTM)
*
*
*
*
*
B. thunbergii ‘Velglozam’ (Velvet
GlowTM)
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day
of September 2010.
Gregory Parham
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–22363 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–S
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0499; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–06–AD; Amendment 39–
16428; AD 2010–18–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BombardierRotax GmbH 912 F Series and 912 S
Series Reciprocating Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by
exceeding pressure in front of the mechanical
fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel
pump), in limited cases a deviation in the
fuel supply could occur. This can result in
exceeding of the fuel pressure and might
cause engine malfunction and/or massive
fuel leakage.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the
pump from exceeding the fuel pressure,
which could result in engine
malfunction or a massive fuel leak.
These conditions could cause loss of
control of the airplane or a fire.
This AD becomes effective
October 13, 2010.
DATES:
The Docket Operations
office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 17, 2010 (75 FR 27487).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by
exceeding pressure in front of the mechanical
fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel
pump), in limited cases a deviation in the
fuel supply could occur. This can result in
exceeding of the fuel pressure and might
cause engine malfunction and/or massive
fuel leakage.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:27 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this AD will affect about
50 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 0.5 workhour per product to comply with this
AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts will cost
about $650 per product. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the AD
on U.S. operators to be $34,625.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54463
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone
(800) 647–5527) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–18–14 Bombardier-Rotax GmbH
(Formerly Motorenfabrik): Amendment
39–16428. Docket No. FAA–2010–0499;
Directorate Identifier 2010–NE–06–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective October 13, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax
912 F series and 912 S series reciprocating
engines with fuel pumps, part numbers
(P/Ns) 892230, 892232, 892540 (standard
version) or P/Ns 892235, 892236, 892545
(version including flexible fuel line),
installed. These engines are installed on, but
not limited to, Diamond (formerly HOAC)
HK–36R Super Dimona, Aeromot AMT–200S
Super Ximango; Diamond DA20–A1 Katana;
Scheibe SF 25C; Iniziative Industriali Italiane
S.p.A. Sky Arrow 650 TC, and 650 TCN
airplanes.
Reason
(d) This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by
exceeding pressure in front of the mechanical
fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel
pump), in limited cases a deviation in the
fuel supply could occur. This can result in
exceeding of the fuel pressure and might
cause engine malfunction and/or massive
fuel leakage.
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
54464
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
We are issuing this AD to prevent the pump
from exceeding the fuel pressure, which
could result in engine malfunction or a
massive fuel leak. These conditions could
cause loss of control of the airplane or a fire.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) At the next maintenance, or within the
next 25 hours of engine operation, whichever
occurs first, after the effective date of this
AD, remove affected fuel pumps, P/Ns
892230, 892232, 892235, 892236, 892540, or
892545.
(2) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install fuel pump, P/Ns 892230, 892232,
892235, 892236, 892540, or 892545, on any
engine.
FAA AD Differences
(f) This AD differs from the MCAI and/or
service information as follows: The MCAI
requires replacing an affected fuel pump with
fuel pump, P/N 892542 or 892546. This AD
requires replacement of an affected fuel
pump with a fuel pump eligible for
installation on the airplane.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI AD 2007–0060R1–E,
dated April 20, 2007, and Rotax Aircraft
Engines Service Bulletin SB–912–053, dated
April 13, 2007, for related information.
Contact BRP–Rotax GmbH & Co. KG, Welser
Strasse 32, A–4623 Gunskirchen, Austria, or
go to: https://www.rotax-aircraftengines.com/, for a copy of this service
information.
(i) Contact Alan Strom, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
August 27, 2010.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2010–22147 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
17:27 Sep 07, 2010
17 CFR Part 200
[Release No. 34–62821]
Delegation of Authority to the Director
of Its Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission is amending
its rules to delegate authority to the
Director of the Division of Enforcement,
in connection with the collection of
delinquent debts arising from actions to
enforce the federal securities laws, to
terminate collection activity or
discharge debts, to accept or reject offers
to compromise debts, and to accept or
reject offers to enter into payment plans.
This action is intended to facilitate the
Commission’s debt resolution process.
DATES: Effective Date: September 8,
2010.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Other FAA AD Provisions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Jkt 220001
Kenneth H. Hall, 202–551–4936, Office
of Chief Counsel, Division of
Enforcement, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–6553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Division of Enforcement seeks actively
to collect amounts imposed in the civil
actions that it files in federal district
court and in administrative proceedings;
these amounts represent disgorgement
of ill-gotten gains from violations of the
Federal securities laws and civil
penalties. The Division pursues debts
through further litigation, including
contempt proceedings, against the
debtor, and is authorized to refer
delinquent debts to the U.S. Department
of the Treasury for administrative
collection activity, including offset of
debts against amounts otherwise owed
by the government to the debtor and
administrative garnishment of a debtor’s
wages.
Based upon a debtor’s financial
condition, as substantiated by creditable
evidence, the Commission may
determine to accept a debtor’s offer to
pay the debt in installments, or to
compromise, i.e., satisfy the debt by
payment of a lesser amount than the
outstanding balance. In addition, when
all reasonable steps have been taken to
collect a debt, the Commission may
authorize its staff to terminate collection
activity or discharge the debt.
Termination of collection activity
preserves the debt as an obligation of
the debtor, and does not bar future
activity to collect the debt should that
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
become practicable. Discharge of the
debt is essentially a forgiveness of the
debtor’s obligation to pay, which may
have tax consequences for the debtor.
The Commission is delegating to the
Director of the Division of Enforcement
the authority to resolve certain debts
arising from actions to enforce the
federal securities laws; in particular, the
Director is authorized to terminate
collection activity or discharge debts, to
accept offers to compromise debts
(when the principal amount of the debt
is $5 million or less) or to reject any
offers to compromise debts, and to
accept or reject offers to enter into
payment plans. This delegation will
improve the efficiency of the Division’s
debt collection program.
In any case the Division Director
deems appropriate, the recommendation
that a debt be resolved through
termination of collection activity,
discharge or by payment plan or
compromise, may be submitted to the
Commission for review.
Administrative Law Matters:
The Commission finds, in accordance
with section 553(b)(3)(A) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (‘‘APA’’)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A)) that this
amendment relates solely to agency
organization, procedure, or practice, and
does not relate to a substantive rule.
Accordingly, notice, opportunity for
public comment, and publication of the
amendment prior to its effective date are
unnecessary. For the same reason, and
because this amendment does not
substantively affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties, the
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act,
5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C), are not applicable.
Additionally, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, which apply
only when notice and comment are
required by the APA or other law,
5 U.S.C. 603, are not applicable. Section
23(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78w(a)(2), requires
the Commission, in adopting rules
under that Act, to consider the
anticompetitive effects of any rules it
adopts. The Commission does not
believe that the amendment the
Commission is adopting today will have
any impact on competition. Finally, this
amendment does not contain any
collection of information requirements
as defined by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1980, as amended.
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and
procedure, Authority delegations
(Government agencies).
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54462-54464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22147]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0499; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-06-AD;
Amendment 39-16428; AD 2010-18-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F Series and
912 S Series Reciprocating Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
[[Page 54463]]
an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the
unsafe condition as:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by exceeding pressure in front
of the mechanical fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel pump),
in limited cases a deviation in the fuel supply could occur. This
can result in exceeding of the fuel pressure and might cause engine
malfunction and/or massive fuel leakage.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the pump from exceeding the fuel
pressure, which could result in engine malfunction or a massive fuel
leak. These conditions could cause loss of control of the airplane or a
fire.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7143; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 17, 2010 (75 FR
27487). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by exceeding pressure in front
of the mechanical fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel pump),
in limited cases a deviation in the fuel supply could occur. This
can result in exceeding of the fuel pressure and might cause engine
malfunction and/or massive fuel leakage.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about 50 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 0.5 work-hour per product to comply with this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about
$650 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
AD on U.S. operators to be $34,625.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone (800) 647-5527) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-18-14 Bombardier-Rotax GmbH (Formerly Motorenfabrik): Amendment
39-16428. Docket No. FAA-2010-0499; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-
06-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October
13, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax 912 F series and 912 S
series reciprocating engines with fuel pumps, part numbers (P/Ns)
892230, 892232, 892540 (standard version) or P/Ns 892235, 892236,
892545 (version including flexible fuel line), installed. These
engines are installed on, but not limited to, Diamond (formerly
HOAC) HK-36R Super Dimona, Aeromot AMT-200S Super Ximango; Diamond
DA20-A1 Katana; Scheibe SF 25C; Iniziative Industriali Italiane
S.p.A. Sky Arrow 650 TC, and 650 TCN airplanes.
Reason
(d) This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Due to high fuel pressure, caused by exceeding pressure in front
of the mechanical fuel pump (e.g. due to an electrical fuel pump),
in limited cases a deviation in the fuel supply could occur. This
can result in exceeding of the fuel pressure and might cause engine
malfunction and/or massive fuel leakage.
[[Page 54464]]
We are issuing this AD to prevent the pump from exceeding the fuel
pressure, which could result in engine malfunction or a massive fuel
leak. These conditions could cause loss of control of the airplane
or a fire.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) At the next maintenance, or within the next 25 hours of
engine operation, whichever occurs first, after the effective date
of this AD, remove affected fuel pumps, P/Ns 892230, 892232, 892235,
892236, 892540, or 892545.
(2) After the effective date of this AD, do not install fuel
pump, P/Ns 892230, 892232, 892235, 892236, 892540, or 892545, on any
engine.
FAA AD Differences
(f) This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as
follows: The MCAI requires replacing an affected fuel pump with fuel
pump, P/N 892542 or 892546. This AD requires replacement of an
affected fuel pump with a fuel pump eligible for installation on the
airplane.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI AD 2007-0060R1-E, dated April 20, 2007, and
Rotax Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin SB-912-053, dated April 13,
2007, for related information. Contact BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co. KG,
Welser Strasse 32, A-4623 Gunskirchen, Austria, or go to:
http:[sol][sol]www.rotax-aircraft-engines.com[sol], for a copy of
this service information.
(i) Contact Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238-7143; fax (781) 238-7199, for more information
about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 27, 2010.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22147 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P