Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls, 54540-54541 [2010-21955]
Download as PDF
54540
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—SERVICE BULLETINS—Continued
Document
Date
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–55–3032 ...................................................................................................................................
Airbus Service Bulletin A340–55–4029 ...................................................................................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
30, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–22275 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 742, 744, and 746
[Docket No. 100719301–0303–02]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export
Controls
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign
policy-based export controls in the
Export Administration Regulations to
determine whether they should be
modified, rescinded or extended. To
help make these determinations, BIS is
seeking public comments on how
existing foreign policy-based export
controls have affected exporters and the
general public.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by
e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or on paper to Regulatory Policy
Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC
20230. Include the phrase ‘‘FPBEC
Comment’’ in the subject line of the
e-mail message or on the envelope if
submitting comments on paper. All
comments must be in writing (either
e-mail or on paper). All comments,
including Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
will be a matter of public record and
will be available for public inspection
and copying. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Foreign Policy Division, Office
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
of Nonproliferation Controls and Treaty
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, telephone 202–482–4252.
Copies of the current Annual Foreign
Policy Report to the Congress are
available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
news/2010/2010_fpreport.pdf and
copies may also be requested by calling
the Office of Nonproliferation and
Treaty Compliance at the number listed
above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign
policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are
implemented pursuant to section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended, (50 U.S.C. app. sections
2401–2420 (2000)) (EAA). The current
foreign policy-based export controls
maintained by the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS) are set forth in the
EAR (15 CFR parts 730–774), including
in parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744
(End-User and End-Use Based Controls)
and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special
Controls). These controls apply to a
range of countries, items, activities and
persons, including: Entities acting
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States (§ 744.11); certain general
purpose microprocessors for ‘‘military
end-uses’’ and ‘‘military end-users’’
(§ 744.17); significant items (SI): Hot
section technology for the development,
production, or overhaul of commercial
aircraft engines, components, and
systems (§ 742.14); encryption items
(§ 742.15); crime control and detection
items (§ 742.7); specially designed
implements of torture (§ 742.11); certain
firearms and related items based on the
Organization of American States Model
Regulations for the Control of the
International Movement of Firearms,
their Parts and Components and
Munitions included within the InterAmerican Convention Against the Illicit
Manufacturing of and Trafficking in
Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and
Other Related Materials (§ 742.17);
regional stability items (§ 742.6);
equipment and related technical data
used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket
systems and unmanned air vehicles
(§§ 742.5 and 744.3); chemical
precursors and biological agents,
associated equipment, technical data,
and software related to the production
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
December 22, 2003.
December 22, 2003.
of chemical and biological agents
(§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various
chemicals included on the list of those
chemicals controlled pursuant to the
Chemical Weapons Convention
(§ 742.18); nuclear propulsion (§ 744.5);
aircraft and vessels (§ 744.7); restrictions
on exports and reexports to certain
persons designated as proliferators of
weapons of mass destruction (§ 744.8);
communication intercepting devices,
software and technology (§ 742.13);
embargoed countries (part 746);
countries designated as supporters of
acts of international terrorism (§§ 742.8,
742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 746.4,
746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in
Russia (§ 744.10); individual terrorists
and terrorist organizations (§§ 744.12,
744.13 and 744.14); certain persons
designated by Executive Order 13315
(‘‘Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi
Regime, Its Senior Officials and Their
Family Members’’) (§ 744.18); certain
sanctioned entities (§ 744.20); and
certain cameras to be used by military
end-users or incorporated into a military
commodity (§ 744.9). Attention is also
given in this context to the controls on
nuclear-related commodities,
technology, end-uses and end-users
(§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the
Nuclear Non Proliferation Act (42 U.S.C.
2139a).
Under the provisions of section 6 of
the EAA, export controls maintained for
foreign policy purposes require annual
extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires
a report to Congress when foreign
policy-based export controls are
extended. The EAA expired on August
20, 2001. Executive Order 13222 of
August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the
most recent being that of Notice of
August 12, 2010 (75 FR 50681 (August
16, 2010)), continues the EAR and, to
the extent permitted by law, the
provisions of the EAA, in effect under
the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce,
insofar as appropriate, follows the
provisions of section 6 of the EAA by
reviewing its foreign policy-based
export controls, requesting public
comments on such controls, and
preparing a report to be submitted to
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Congress. In January 2010, the Secretary
of Commerce, on the recommendation
of the Secretary of State, extended for
one year all foreign policy-based export
controls then in effect. BIS is now
soliciting public comment on the effects
of extending or modifying the existing
foreign policy-based export controls for
another year. Among the criteria
considered in determining whether to
continue or revise U.S. foreign policybased export controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls
will achieve their intended foreign
policy purposes, in light of other factors,
including the availability from other
countries of the goods, software or
technology proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy
objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other
alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls
with the foreign policy objectives of the
United States and with overall U.S.
policy toward the country subject to the
controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other
countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the
controls ineffective in achieving the
intended foreign policy objective or be
counterproductive to U.S. foreign policy
interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S.
foreign policy objectives versus the
effect of the controls on the export
performance of the United States, the
competitive position of the United
States in the international economy, the
international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and
technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to
effectively enforce the controls.
BIS is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the economic
impact of proliferation controls. BIS is
also interested in industry information
relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign
policy-based export controls on sales of
U.S. products to third countries (i.e.,
those countries not targeted by
sanctions), including the views of
foreign purchasers or prospective
customers regarding U.S. foreign policybased export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained
by U.S. trade partners. For example, to
what extent do U.S. trade partners have
similar controls on goods and
technology on a worldwide basis or to
specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or
practices by our foreign trade partners
that are similar to U.S. foreign policybased export controls, including license
review criteria, use of conditions, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 Sep 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements for pre- and post-shipment
verifications (preferably supported by
examples of approvals, denials and
foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign
policy-based export controls that would
bring them more into line with
multilateral practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to
actions that would make multilateral
controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade or acquisitions by
intended targets of the controls.
7. Data or other information on the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on overall trade at the level of
individual industrial sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure
the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign
policy-based export controls on targeted
countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments
relating generally to the extension or
revision of existing foreign policy-based
export controls.
Parties submitting comments are
asked to be as specific as possible. All
comments received before the close of
the comment period will be considered
by BIS in reviewing the controls and
developing the report to Congress.
All comments received in response to
this notice will be displayed on BIS’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web
site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia.
Dated: August 30, 2010.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–21955 Filed 9–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 31
[REG–146893–02, REG–115037–00]
RIN 1545–BJ32
Treatment of Services Under Section
482; Allocation of Income and
Deductions From Intangibles
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document withdraws
proposed regulations published in the
Federal Register on September 10, 2003
(68 FR 53448), related to the treatment
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54541
of controlled services transactions under
section 482 and the allocation of income
from intangibles, in particular with
respect to contributions by a controlled
party to the value of an intangible that
is owned by another controlled party.
The IRS and Treasury Department are
withdrawing those proposed regulations
because they have been superseded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory A. Spring (202) 435–5265 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 10, 2003, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register (68 FR 53448,
REG–146893–02 and REG–115037–00)
proposed regulations relating to the
treatment of controlled services
transactions and the allocation of
income from intangible property, in
particular with respect to contributions
by a controlled party to the value of
intangible property owned by another
controlled party. On August 4, 2006, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
published in the Federal Register (71
FR 44466, TD 9278, REG–146893–02,
REG–115037–00, and REG–138603–03)
temporary regulations relating to the
treatment of controlled services
transactions, the allocation of income
from intangible property, and
stewardship expenses under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.861–8(e)(4). A notice of proposed
rulemaking cross-referencing the
temporary regulations was published in
the Federal Register on the same day
(71 FR 44247). Written comments
responding to the notice of proposed
rulemaking were received, and a public
hearing was held on October 27, 2006.
That notice of proposed rulemaking
superseded the proposed regulations
published in the Federal Register on
September 10, 2003.
On August 4, 2009, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register (74 FR 38830, TD
9456) final regulations that are generally
consistent with the proposed
regulations that were published on
August 4, 2006, in the Federal Register
(71 FR 44247), and removed the
corresponding temporary regulations.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 31
Employment taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Pensions, Railroad retirement,
Reporting and recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54540-54541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21955]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 742, 744, and 746
[Docket No. 100719301-0303-02]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the
foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration
Regulations to determine whether they should be modified, rescinded or
extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is seeking public
comments on how existing foreign policy-based export controls have
affected exporters and the general public.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230. Include the phrase ``FPBEC
Comment'' in the subject line of the e-mail message or on the envelope
if submitting comments on paper. All comments must be in writing
(either e-mail or on paper). All comments, including Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter will be a matter of public record and will be available
for public inspection and copying. Do not submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Foreign Policy Division,
Office of Nonproliferation Controls and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of
Industry and Security, telephone 202-482-4252. Copies of the current
Annual Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2010/2010_fpreport.pdf and copies may also be
requested by calling the Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance at the number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to section 6
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, (50 U.S.C. app.
sections 2401-2420 (2000)) (EAA). The current foreign policy-based
export controls maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
are set forth in the EAR (15 CFR parts 730-774), including in parts 742
(CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based Controls) and 746
(Embargoes and Other Special Controls). These controls apply to a range
of countries, items, activities and persons, including: Entities acting
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States (Sec. 744.11); certain general purpose microprocessors
for ``military end-uses'' and ``military end-users'' (Sec. 744.17);
significant items (SI): Hot section technology for the development,
production, or overhaul of commercial aircraft engines, components, and
systems (Sec. 742.14); encryption items (Sec. 742.15); crime control
and detection items (Sec. 742.7); specially designed implements of
torture (Sec. 742.11); certain firearms and related items based on the
Organization of American States Model Regulations for the Control of
the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and
Munitions included within the Inter-American Convention Against the
Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition,
Explosives, and Other Related Materials (Sec. 742.17); regional
stability items (Sec. 742.6); equipment and related technical data
used in the design, development, production, or use of certain rocket
systems and unmanned air vehicles (Sec. Sec. 742.5 and 744.3);
chemical precursors and biological agents, associated equipment,
technical data, and software related to the production of chemical and
biological agents (Sec. Sec. 742.2 and 744.4) and various chemicals
included on the list of those chemicals controlled pursuant to the
Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec. 742.18); nuclear propulsion (Sec.
744.5); aircraft and vessels (Sec. 744.7); restrictions on exports and
reexports to certain persons designated as proliferators of weapons of
mass destruction (Sec. 744.8); communication intercepting devices,
software and technology (Sec. 742.13); embargoed countries (part 746);
countries designated as supporters of acts of international terrorism
(Sec. Sec. 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 746.4, 746.7, and
746.9); certain entities in Russia (Sec. 744.10); individual
terrorists and terrorist organizations (Sec. Sec. 744.12, 744.13 and
744.14); certain persons designated by Executive Order 13315
(``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials
and Their Family Members'') (Sec. 744.18); certain sanctioned entities
(Sec. 744.20); and certain cameras to be used by military end-users or
incorporated into a military commodity (Sec. 744.9). Attention is also
given in this context to the controls on nuclear-related commodities,
technology, end-uses and end-users (Sec. Sec. 742.3 and 744.2), which
are, in part, implemented under section 309(c) of the Nuclear Non
Proliferation Act (42 U.S.C. 2139a).
Under the provisions of section 6 of the EAA, export controls
maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual extension.
Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when foreign policy-
based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on August 20, 2001.
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783
(2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the most recent being that of Notice of August 12, 2010 (75 FR 50681
(August 16, 2010)), continues the EAR and, to the extent permitted by
law, the provisions of the EAA, in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)). The
Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate, follows the provisions
of section 6 of the EAA by reviewing its foreign policy-based export
controls, requesting public comments on such controls, and preparing a
report to be submitted to
[[Page 54541]]
Congress. In January 2010, the Secretary of Commerce, on the
recommendation of the Secretary of State, extended for one year all
foreign policy-based export controls then in effect. BIS is now
soliciting public comment on the effects of extending or modifying the
existing foreign policy-based export controls for another year. Among
the criteria considered in determining whether to continue or revise
U.S. foreign policy-based export controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve their intended
foreign policy purposes, in light of other factors, including the
availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology
proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy
objectives of the United States and with overall U.S. policy toward the
country subject to the controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving
the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to U.S.
foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the
international economy, the international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to effectively enforce the
controls.
BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in
industry information relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based
export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For
example, to what extent do U.S. trade partners have similar controls on
goods and technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign
trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions, and
requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export
controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral
practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make
multilateral controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the
controls.
7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial
sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the
extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls.
Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the
report to Congress.
All comments received in response to this notice will be displayed
on BIS's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia.
Dated: August 30, 2010.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-21955 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P