New Postal Product, 54401-54402 [2010-22155]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) is requesting that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) extend approval, under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, of the
collection of information for the
termination premium under its
regulation on Payment of Premiums (29
CFR Part 4007) (OMB control number
1212–0064; expires October 31, 2010),
without change. This notice informs the
public of PBGC’s request and solicits
public comment on the collection of
information.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
by October 7, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
via electronic mail at
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov or by fax
to 202–395–6974.
The collection of information (Form T
and instructions) and PBGC’s premium
payment regulation may be accessed on
PBGC’s Web site at https://
www.pbgc.gov. Copies of the collection
of information and PBGC’s request may
also be obtained without charge by
writing to the Disclosure Division of the
Office of the General Counsel of PBGC,
1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005, or by visiting the Disclosure
Division or calling 202–326–4040
during normal business hours. (TTY and
TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and
ask to be connected to 202–326–4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah C. Murphy, Staff Attorney,
Legislative and Regulatory Department,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005–4026, 202–326–4024. (TTY and
TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and
ask to be connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
administers the pension plan
termination insurance program under
title IV of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Section 4006(a)(7) of ERISA provides for
a ‘‘termination premium’’ (in addition to
the flat-rate and variable-rate premiums
under section 4006(a)(3)(A) and (E) of
ERISA) that is payable for three years
following certain distress and
involuntary plan terminations. PBGC’s
regulations on Premium Rates (29 CFR
part 4006) and Payment of Premiums
(29 CFR part 4007) implement the
termination premium. Sections 4007.3
and 4007.13(b) of the premium payment
regulation require the filing of
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Sep 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
termination premium information and
payments with PBGC. PBGC has
promulgated Form T and instructions
for paying the termination premium.
In general, the termination premium
applies where a single-employer plan
terminates in a distress termination
under ERISA section 4041(c) (unless
contributing sponsors and controlled
group members meet the bankruptcy
liquidation requirements of ERISA
section 4041(c)(2)(B)(i)) or in an
involuntary termination under ERISA
section 4042, and the termination date
under section 4048 of ERISA is after
2005. The termination premium does
not apply in certain cases where
termination occurs during a bankruptcy
proceeding filed before October 18,
2005.
The termination premium is payable
for three years. The same amount is
payable each year. The amount of each
payment is based on the number of
participants in the plan as of the day
before the termination date. In general,
the amount of each payment is equal to
$1,250 times the number of participants.
However, the rate is increased from
$1,250 to $2,500 in certain cases
involving commercial airline or airline
catering service plans. The termination
premium is due on the 30th day of each
of three consecutive 12-month periods.
The first 12-month period generally
begins shortly after the termination date
or after the conclusion of bankruptcy
proceedings in certain cases.
Sections 4007.3 and 4007.13(b) of the
premium payment regulation require
the filing of termination premiums and
related information. A filing must be
made by a person liable for the
termination premium. The persons
liable for the termination premium are
contributing sponsors and members of
their controlled groups, determined on
the day before the plan termination
date. Interest on late termination
premiums is charged at the rate imposed
under section 6601(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code, compounded daily, from
the due date to the payment date.
Penalties based on facts and
circumstances may be assessed both for
failure to timely pay the termination
premium and for failure to timely file
required related information and may be
waived in appropriate circumstances. A
penalty for late payment will not exceed
the amount of termination premium
paid late. Section 4007.10 of the
premium payment regulation requires
the retention of records supporting or
validating the computation of premiums
paid and requires that the records be
made available to PBGC.
OMB has approved the termination
premium collection of information
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54401
(Form T and instructions) under control
number 1212–0064 through October 31,
2010. PBGC is requesting that OMB
extend approval of this collection of
information for three years, without
change. (In connection with this request
for extension of OMB approval, Form T
has been reformatted without
substantive change, and current burden
data and instructions for the hearing
impaired have been added to the Form
T instructions.) An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
PBGC assumes that termination
premium filings will be made with
respect to one termination per year.
Accordingly, PBGC assumes that it will
receive each year an average of about
one first-year, one second-year, and one
third-year termination premium filing
from an average of about three plan
sponsor groups. Thus, PBGC estimates
that the total annual burden of the
collection of information will be about
two-and-a-half hours and $16,625.
Issued in Washington, DC, August 30,
2010.
John H. Hanley,
Director, Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2010–22222 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010–102 and CP2010–103;
Order No. 529]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently–filed Postal Service request to
add two Global Expedited Package
Services 3 contracts to the competitive
product list. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with the
filing.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments are due: September 8,
2010.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section by telephone for advice on
alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
54402
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
I. Introduction
On August 30, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice announcing that it
has entered into two additional Global
Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3)
contracts.1 The Postal Service believes
the instant contracts are functionally
equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and are supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice explains that
Order No. 86, which established GEPS
1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290,
the Commission approved the GEPS 2
product.2 In Order No. 503, the
Commission approved the GEPS 3
product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in
Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the
baseline contract for future functional
equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3
product.
The instant contracts. The Postal
Service filed the instant contracts
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that each
contract is in accordance with Order No.
86. The term of each contract is one year
from the date the Postal Service notifies
the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
• Attachments 1A and 1B—redacted
copies of the two contracts and
applicable annexes;
•Attachments 2A and 2B—certified
statements required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, which
establishes prices and classifications for
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
Two Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements
and Application For Non–Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, August 30, 2010
(Notice).
2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Sep 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
GEPS contracts, a description of
applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis of the formulas, and
certification of the Governors’ vote; and
• Attachment 4—an application for
non–public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contracts and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for GEPS. The Postal Service identifies
customer–specific information and
general contract terms that distinguish
the instant contracts from the baseline
GEPS 3 agreement. Id. at 4–5. It states
that the differences, which include price
variations based on updated costing
information and volume commitments,
do not alter the contracts’ functional
equivalency. Id. at 4. The Postal Service
asserts that ‘‘[b]ecause the agreements
incorporate the same cost attributes and
methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these two GEPS
contracts are similar, if not the same, as
the relevant characteristics of previously
filed contracts.’’ Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its
filings demonstrate that each of the new
GEPS 3 contracts complies with the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests
that the instant contracts be included
within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–102 and CP2010–103 for
consideration of matters related to the
contracts identified in the Postal
Service’s Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a
consolidated basis for purposes of this
order. Filings with respect to a
particular contract should be filed in
that docket.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s contracts are consistent with
the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642. Comments are due no later than
September 8, 2010. The public portions
of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov.)
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned
proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. CP2010–102 and CP2010–103 for
consideration of matters raised by the
Postal Service’s Notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
September 8, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as the
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–22155 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. A2010–6; Order No. 527]
Post Office Closing
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document informs the
public that an appeal of the closing of
the Renfro Valley Post Office, Renfro
Valley, Kentucky 40473, has been filed.
It identifies preliminary steps and
provides a procedural schedule.
Publication of this document will allow
the Postal Service, petitioner, and others
to take appropriate action.
DATES: Deadline for filing administrative
record: September 9, 2010. See the
Procedural Schedule for other important
dates.
ADDRESSES: Submit filings electronically
via the Commission’s Filing Online
system at https://www.prc.gov. Those
who cannot file electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
404(d), the Commission has received an
appeal of the closing of the Renfro
Valley Post Office, Renfro Valley,
Kentucky 40473. The appeal, which
appears to be postmarked August 19,
2010, was received by the Commission
on August 25, 2010. The Commission
hereby institutes a proceeding under 39
U.S.C. 404(d)(5) and designates the case
as Docket No. A2010–6 to consider the
petitioner’s appeal. If the petitioner
would like to further explain his
position with supplemental information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54401-54402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22155]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010-102 and CP2010-103; Order No. 529]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to add two Global Expedited Package Services 3 contracts to the
competitive product list. This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with the filing.
DATES: Comments are due: September 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice
on alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
[[Page 54402]]
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On August 30, 2010, the Postal Service filed a notice announcing
that it has entered into two additional Global Expedited Package
Services 3 (GEPS 3) contracts.\1\ The Postal Service believes the
instant contracts are functionally equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and are supported by Governors' Decision No. 08-7,
attached to the Notice and originally filed in Docket No. CP2008-4. Id.
at 1, Attachment 3. The Notice explains that Order No. 86, which
established GEPS 1 as a product, also authorized functionally
equivalent agreements to be included within the product, provided that
they meet the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No.
290, the Commission approved the GEPS 2 product.\2\ In Order No. 503,
the Commission approved the GEPS 3 product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in Docket No. CP2010-71 serve as
the baseline contract for future functional equivalence analyses of the
GEPS 3 product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing Two
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package Services 3
Negotiated Service Agreements and Application For Non-Public
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, August 30, 2010 (Notice).
\2\ Docket No. CP2009-50, Order Granting Clarification and
Adding Global Expedited Package Services 2 to the Competitive
Product List, August 28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The instant contracts. The Postal Service filed the instant
contracts pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, the Postal Service
contends that each contract is in accordance with Order No. 86. The
term of each contract is one year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3.
In support of its Notice, the Postal Service filed four attachments
as follows:
Attachments 1A and 1B--redacted copies of the two
contracts and applicable annexes;
Attachments 2A and 2B--certified statements required by 39
CFR 3015.5(c)(2) for each contract;
Attachment 3--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
08-7, which establishes prices and classifications for GEPS contracts,
a description of applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for prices, an
analysis of the formulas, and certification of the Governors' vote; and
Attachment 4--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contracts and supporting
documents under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the instant GEPS 3 contracts fit
within the Mail Classification Schedule language for GEPS. The Postal
Service identifies customer-specific information and general contract
terms that distinguish the instant contracts from the baseline GEPS 3
agreement. Id. at 4-5. It states that the differences, which include
price variations based on updated costing information and volume
commitments, do not alter the contracts' functional equivalency. Id. at
4. The Postal Service asserts that ``[b]ecause the agreements
incorporate the same cost attributes and methodology, the relevant
characteristics of these two GEPS contracts are similar, if not the
same, as the relevant characteristics of previously filed contracts.''
Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its filings demonstrate that each
of the new GEPS 3 contracts complies with the requirements of 39 U.S.C.
3633 and is functionally equivalent to the baseline GEPS 3 contract.
Therefore, it requests that the instant contracts be included within
the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-102 and CP2010-103
for consideration of matters related to the contracts identified in the
Postal Service's Notice.
These dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for purposes of
this order. Filings with respect to a particular contract should be
filed in that docket.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's contracts are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642. Comments are due no later than September 8, 2010. The
public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's
Web site (http:[sol][sol]www.prc.gov.)
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned proceedings.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. CP2010-102 and CP2010-103
for consideration of matters raised by the Postal Service's Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than September 8, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as the officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22155 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S