Patriot Rail, LLC, Patriot Rail Holdings LLC, and Patriot Rail Corp.-Continuance in Control Exemption-Piedmont & Northern Railway, Inc., 53734-53735 [2010-21805]
Download as PDF
53734
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below will be forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on June 9, 2010
[FR Doc. 2010–0065, Vol. 75, No. 110,
Pages 32838–32839].
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before October 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charlene Doyle, NVS–431, Office of
Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Doyle’s phone number is 202–366–
1276 and her e-mail address is
charlene.doyle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Title: National Child Restraint Use
Special Study (NCRUSS).
OMB Number: 2127–0642.
Type of Request: Request for public
comment on proposed collection of
information.
Abstract: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct information
collections to assess the levels of child
restraint system use and misuse for
children riding in passenger vehicles,
and to examine whether the levels of
use and/or misuse are related to any
specific characteristics of the drivers,
their passengers, the child restraints,
and/or the vehicles. Previous studies
have shown that there is a gap between
recommended child restraint use and
observed use. Actions have been taken
by NTHSA to close the gap. In March
1999, NHTSA published a final rule
establishing a uniform child restraint
attachment system known as LATCH,
Lower Anchors and Tethers for
CHildren (Federal Motor Vehicles Safety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Aug 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
Standard 213, Child Restraint Systems
and FMVSS 225, Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems), in order to provide
another, easier method of attaching a
child restraint to the vehicle. This new
collection of data is necessary in order
to evaluate the effectiveness of FMVSS
225 and FMVSS 213, as well as to
obtain an up to date snapshot of child
restraint use and misuse across the
United States. This information will be
used in assessing what additional
actions NHTSA should take to improve
child passenger safety. In addition,
NTHSA will publish the findings of this
research study to provide information to
States, localities, and other interested
organizations in support of their efforts
to reduce and prevent injuries among
child occupants. NHTSA proposes to
collect observational data on correct and
incorrect use of child restraint systems
in passenger vehicles, as well as
interview information from drivers
about their knowledge and perceptions
of child restraint systems. The primary
population for observation will be
restrained and unrestrained child
passengers riding in any seating
position in passenger vehicles.
Participation in the study will be
voluntary. Interviews with drivers who
agree to participate will be used to
obtain the following data: demographic
information on occupants, the driver’s
knowledge about the specific CRS in the
vehicle, and the driver’s general
knowledge and experience with
different types of restraint systems.
While the interview is being conducted,
a trained observer will collect
information about the CRS in the
vehicle, including the type of restraint
that is used, the type of installation (seat
belt or LATCH), how the CRS is
installed, harness use, and seat belt fit.
The observer will not remove the child
or CRS from the vehicle.
Affected Public: Drivers of passenger
vehicles who are transporting children
and their passengers.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 880
hours.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if
OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
James F. Simons,
Director, Office of Regulatory Analysis and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2010–21871 Filed 8–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35403]
Patriot Rail, LLC, Patriot Rail Holdings
LLC, and Patriot Rail Corp.—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
Piedmont & Northern Railway, Inc.
Patriot Rail, LLC (PRL) and its
subsidiaries, Patriot Rail Holdings LLC
(PRH) and Patriot Rail Corp. (Patriot),
have jointly filed a verified notice of
exemption to continue in control of
Piedmont & Northern Railway, Inc.
(P&N), upon P&N’s becoming a Class III
rail carrier.1
This transaction is related to the
verified notice of exemption filed in
Docket No. FD 35402, Piedmont &
Northern Railway, Inc.—Operation
Exemption—North Carolina Department
of Transportation, in which P&N seeks
an exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to
operate over approximately 13.04 miles
of rail line owned by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, between
Mt. Holly (milepost SFC 11.39) and
Gastonia (milepost SFC 23.0), including
the Belmont spur between Mt. Holly
(milepost SFC 13.6/SFF 0.13) and
Belmont (milepost SFF 1.56), in Gaston
County, N.C.
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on or after September 11,
2010 (30 days after the notice of
exemption was filed).
Patriot currently controls the
following six Class III rail carriers:
Tennessee Southern Railroad Company,
Rarus Railway Company, Utah Central
Railway Company, Sacramento Valley
Railroad, Inc., The Louisiana and North
1 PRL is a noncarrier limited liability company
that owns not less than 51% of the equity interests
in PRH. PRH owns 100% of the stock of Patriot.
Patriot is a noncarrier holding company that owns
100% of the stock of six railroad subsidiaries and
P&N.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 1, 2010 / Notices
West Railroad Company LLC, and
Temple & Central Texas Railway, Inc.
The parties state that: (1) The rail line
to be operated by P&N does not connect
with any other railroads in the corporate
family; (2) the transaction is not part of
a series of anticipated transactions that
would connect this rail line with any
other railroad in the corporate family;
and (3) the transaction does not involve
a Class I rail carrier. Therefore, the
transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under sections 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not
impose labor protective conditions here,
because all of the carriers involved are
Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than September 3, 2010
(at least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35403, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, one copy of each pleading
must be served on Louis E. Gitomer, 600
Baltimore Ave., Suite 301, Towson, MD
21204.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 26, 2010.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–21805 Filed 8–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Opportunity Corridor, City of
Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, OH
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Aug 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement will be
prepared for transportation
improvements proposed in Cuyahoga
County, Ohio.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura S. Leffler, Division Administrator,
Federal Highway Administration, 200
North High Street, Room 328,
Columbus, Ohio 43215, Telephone:
(614) 280–6896.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), in cooperation with the Ohio
Department of Transportation (ODOT),
will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) on a proposal to
construct new roadways on new
alignments between Interstate 490 and
the University Circle area of Cleveland,
Ohio. The study area extends from
Interstate 77/Interstate 490 in the west
to East 105th Street and Chester Avenue
(U.S. 322) in the east and is located
entirely in the City of Cleveland, Ohio.
The study area runs generally parallel to
the existing railroad transportation
corridor containing Greater Cleveland
Regional Transit Authority’s (GCRTA)
Red Line and freight tracks owned and
operated by Norfolk Southern
Corporation (NS) and CSX Corporation
(CSX).
The purpose of the transportation
improvement is to create the
transportation infrastructure to improve
mobility and access in southeast
Cleveland and support the revival and
redevelopment of large tracts of vacant
industrial and residential land within
an area bounded by Cedar Avenue on
the north, east 55th Street on the West,
Woodhill Road/East 93rd Street on the
east and Union Avenue on the south.
Actions under consideration include
(1) six various alternatives to construct
a boulevard type roadway including a
multi-lane urban arterial with curbs, an
elevated landscape median, multimodal facilities, landscaping and
lighting, and (2) taking no action. The
current six various alternatives have
been born out of a previous planning
study called the University Circle
Access Boulevard. The project
development process including the
refinement of Conceptual Alternatives
and the development of Feasible
Alternatives will be included in the
Draft EIS.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State and local
agencies and to private organizations
and citizens who have previously
expressed or are known to have interest
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53735
in this proposal. A series of public
meetings and hearings will be held in
the project area. Public notice will be
given of the exact time and place of the
meetings and the hearing to be held for
the project. The Draft EIS will be
available for public and agency review
and comment prior to the Public
Hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments, and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action or the EIS should be
directed to the FHWA at the address
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: August 19, 2010.
Laura S. Leffler,
Division Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration, Columbus, Ohio.
[FR Doc. 2010–21911 Filed 8–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on East Lake Sammamish Master Plan
Trail in King County, WA
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA
and Other Federal Agencies.
AGENCY:
This notice announces actions
taken by FHWA and other Federal
agencies that are final within the
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to a proposed
transportation enhancement project, the
East Lake Sammamish Trail, starting at
Gilman Boulevard in Issaquah,
Washington and ending at Bear Creek
Trail in Redmond, Washington. Those
actions grant licenses, permits, and
approvals for the project.
DATES: By this notice, FHWA is advising
the public of final agency actions
subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim
seeking judicial review of the Federal
agency actions on the transportation
project will be barred unless the claim
is filed on or before February 28, 2011.
If the Federal law that authorizes
judicial review of a claim provides a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53734-53735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21805]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35403]
Patriot Rail, LLC, Patriot Rail Holdings LLC, and Patriot Rail
Corp.--Continuance in Control Exemption--Piedmont & Northern Railway,
Inc.
Patriot Rail, LLC (PRL) and its subsidiaries, Patriot Rail Holdings
LLC (PRH) and Patriot Rail Corp. (Patriot), have jointly filed a
verified notice of exemption to continue in control of Piedmont &
Northern Railway, Inc. (P&N), upon P&N's becoming a Class III rail
carrier.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ PRL is a noncarrier limited liability company that owns not
less than 51% of the equity interests in PRH. PRH owns 100% of the
stock of Patriot. Patriot is a noncarrier holding company that owns
100% of the stock of six railroad subsidiaries and P&N.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This transaction is related to the verified notice of exemption
filed in Docket No. FD 35402, Piedmont & Northern Railway, Inc.--
Operation Exemption--North Carolina Department of Transportation, in
which P&N seeks an exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate over
approximately 13.04 miles of rail line owned by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, between Mt. Holly (milepost SFC 11.39)
and Gastonia (milepost SFC 23.0), including the Belmont spur between
Mt. Holly (milepost SFC 13.6/SFF 0.13) and Belmont (milepost SFF 1.56),
in Gaston County, N.C.
The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after
September 11, 2010 (30 days after the notice of exemption was filed).
Patriot currently controls the following six Class III rail
carriers: Tennessee Southern Railroad Company, Rarus Railway Company,
Utah Central Railway Company, Sacramento Valley Railroad, Inc., The
Louisiana and North
[[Page 53735]]
West Railroad Company LLC, and Temple & Central Texas Railway, Inc.
The parties state that: (1) The rail line to be operated by P&N
does not connect with any other railroads in the corporate family; (2)
the transaction is not part of a series of anticipated transactions
that would connect this rail line with any other railroad in the
corporate family; and (3) the transaction does not involve a Class I
rail carrier. Therefore, the transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does
not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324
and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the
Board may not impose labor protective conditions here, because all of
the carriers involved are Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than September 3,
2010 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 35403, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Louis E. Gitomer, 600 Baltimore Ave., Suite
301, Towson, MD 21204.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 26, 2010.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-21805 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P