Notice of Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting, 53374-53375 [2010-21796]
Download as PDF
53374
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
i. Analysis of spatial output. Certain
models may be limited in the output of the
cross wind concentration profile (e.g.,
Gaussian concentration profiles in the crosswind direction). The maximum arc wise
concentration should be based on the
location of the experimental sensor data that
produced the maximum arc wise
concentration relative to the cloud centerline.
The centerline concentration of the model
may not necessarily be representative of the
maximum concentration measurement
location. Any interpolations and
extrapolations used to determine
concentrations should be documented,
f. Calculation of SPMs specified in the
MEP for each experiment and data point
in addition to the average of all
experiments.
g. A tabulation of all simulations,
including all specified input
parameters, calculated outputs.
h. A tabulation of all calculated
SPMs.4
i. All relevant input and output files
used.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24,
2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–21588 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
3 Experimental uncertainty due to the sampling
time, time averaging, spatial/volumetric averaging,
cloud meander, and other errors associated with the
experiment are not required to be quantified, but
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
evaluated and discussed. If a model cannot
represent the actual location of the sensor
relative to the centerline, the effect of these
simplifications should be discussed or
evaluated.
ii. Analysis of temporal output. Certain
models may be limited in the temporal
resolution that can be outputted. Any
interpolations and extrapolations used to
determine concentrations should be
documented, evaluated and discussed. If
desired, transient data of the model and
experimental data may be provided to
supplement the maximum arc wise values to
allow for more detailed comparisons with the
experimental data, including the evaluation
of discrepancies due to spurious
experimental or model results.
c. An uncertainty analysis that
accounts for experimental uncertainty
due to uncertainty in the sensor
measurement of gas concentration,3
where known. Other sources of
uncertainty may also be included.
d. Graphical depictions of the
predicted and measured gas
concentration values for each
experiment with indication of the
experimental and model uncertainty
determined from the analyses described
above. Vertical error bars should be
used to represent the uncertainty.
e. Calculation of the specific
performance measures (SPMs) below in
addition to those specified in the MEP:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATES:
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 670 (Sub-No. 1)]
Notice of Rail Energy Transportation
Advisory Committee Meeting
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice of Rail Energy
Transportation Advisory Committee
meeting.
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given of a
meeting of the Rail Energy
Transportation Advisory Committee
(RETAC), pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
Public Law 92–463, as amended (5
U.S.C., App. 2).
SUMMARY:
the analysis may benefit from them being evaluated
or discussed.
4 If the model predictions are outside the
experimental uncertainty interval or MEP SPMs,
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 1:30
p.m. M.D.T.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the offices of Xcel Energy, 1800 Larimer
Street, 2nd Floor, Conference Center,
Denver, Colorado 80202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott M. Zimmerman (202) 245–0202.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at:
(800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RETAC
arose from a proceeding instituted by
the Board, in Establishment of a Rail
Energy Transportation Advisory
Committee, EP 670. RETAC was formed
to provide advice and guidance to the
Board, and to serve as a forum for
discussion of emerging issues regarding
the transportation by rail of energy
this does not necessarily mean that the model is
unacceptable, but may alternatively impact the
safety factor associated with the model usage.
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
EN31AU10.000
uncertainty in the output used for
evaluation. The analyses should address
the following:
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
resources, particularly, but not
necessarily limited to, coal, ethanol, and
other biofuels. The purpose of this
meeting is to continue discussions
regarding issues such as rail
performance, capacity constraints,
infrastructure planning and
development, and effective coordination
among suppliers, carriers, and users of
energy resources. Potential agenda items
include further consideration of a white
paper on industry Best Practices; a
Performance Measures subcommittee
update on the trends shown in the most
recent industry data; discussion of how
potential regulation of coal plant
emissions may impact coal/rail demand
in the future; discussion of railroads’
preparations for the fall and winter
seasons; and roundtable discussions on
shipment ratability, utility inventory
levels, current rail operations, and rail
service metrics.
The meeting, which is open to the
public, will be conducted pursuant to
RETAC’s charter and Board procedures.
All guests will need to check in at the
front desk, show a picture I.D., receive
a visitor’s badge, and will be escorted to
the 2nd floor.
Further communications about this
meeting may be announced through the
Board’s Web site at www.stb.dot.gov.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721, 49 U.S.C. 11101;
49 U.S.C. 11121.
Decided: August 26, 2010.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–21796 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Chrysler
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler)
petition for exemption of the Fiat 500
vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR
Part 543, Exemption From Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of 49 CFR Part
541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2012 Model Year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, International Policy,
Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs,
NHTSA, W43–443, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Mazyck’s phone number is (202)
366–0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated June 16, 2010, Chrysler
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the Fiat 500 vehicle line, beginning
with MY 2012. The petition requested
an exemption from parts-marking
requirements pursuant to 49 CFR 543,
Exemption From Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under Section § 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant exemptions for one of its vehicle
lines per year. Chrysler petitioned the
agency to grant an exemption for its Fiat
500 vehicle line beginning with MY
2012. In its petition, Chrysler provided
a detailed description and diagram of
the identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the new vehicle line. Chrysler will
install the Sentry Key Immobilizer
System (SKIS) antitheft device as
standard equipment on the vehicle line.
The major components of the SKIS
device consist of: A Powertrain Control
Module (PCM), a Totally Integrated
Power Module (TIPM), a Sentry Key
Remote Entry Module (SKREEM), a
transponder key fob and an
ElectroMechanical Instrument Cluster
(EMIC) which controls the telltale
function only. According to Chrysler, all
of these components work collectively
to perform the immobilizer function.
Chrysler also stated that its SKIS device
does not provide a visible or audible
indication of unauthorized vehicle entry
(i.e., flashing lights or horn alarm).
Chrysler stated that the SKIS device
provides passive vehicle protection by
preventing the engine from operating
unless a valid electronically encoded
key is detected in the ignition lock
cylinder. According to Chrysler, the
immobilizer feature is activated when
the key is removed from the ignition
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53375
lock cylinder. Only a valid key inserted
into the ignition lock cylinder will
allow the vehicle to start and continue
to run.
Chrysler stated that the Sentry Key
Immobilizer Module (SKIM), also
known as the Sentry Key Remote Entry
Module/SKREEM, or the Body Control
Module/BCM are integral to the Body
Computer Module (BCM) on the Fiat
500 vehicle line. Chrysler also stated
that the BCM contains a radio frequency
(RF) transceiver and microprocessor that
receives RF signals from the Sentry Key
transponder to the keyfob through a
tuned antenna. According to Chrysler,
the BCM also serves as the Remote
Keyless Entry (RKE) RF receiver.
Specifically, Chrysler stated that the
SKIS device uses radio frequency
communication to obtain confirmation
that the key in the ignition switch is a
valid transponder key for operating the
vehicle. To avoid any perceived delay
when starting the vehicle with a valid
key and to prevent unburned fuel from
entering the exhaust, the engine is
permitted to run for no more than
2 seconds if an invalid key is used.
Chrysler stated that when the ignition
switch is turned on, the BCM transmits
a signal to the transponder in the key
and waits for a response from the
transponder. If the response identifies
the key as invalid, or if no response is
received from the transponder key,
Chrysler stated that the BCM sends an
invalid key message to the Powertrain
Control Module (PCM), and the PCM
will disable engine operation (after the
initial 2-second run) based upon the
status of the BCM messages. Chrysler
further stated that only six consecutive
invalid vehicle start attempts would be
permitted and all other attempts would
be locked out.
Chrysler stated that it will also
incorporate an unauthorized vehicle
start telltale light into the device that
will operate as a security indicator in
the ElectroMechanical Instrument
Cluster (EMIC). According to Chrysler,
the telltale will alert the owner that an
unauthorized vehicle start attempt has
been made. Chrysler stated that upon an
unauthorized start attempt, the telltale
will flash on and off when the ignition
switch is turned to the ‘‘ON’’ position.
Chrysler stated that while the telltale
acts as a security indicator, it also acts
as a diagnostic indicator. Chrysler stated
that if the SKREEM detects a system
malfunction and/or the SKIS device
becomes inoperative, the security
indicator will stay on. However, if the
SKREEM detects an invalid key or if a
key transponder-related fault exists, the
security indicator will flash.
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53374-53375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21796]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 670 (Sub-No. 1)]
Notice of Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Notice of Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee
meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Rail Energy
Transportation Advisory Committee (RETAC), pursuant to section 10(a)(2)
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5
U.S.C., App. 2).
DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at
1:30 p.m. M.D.T.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the offices of Xcel Energy, 1800
Larimer Street, 2nd Floor, Conference Center, Denver, Colorado 80202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott M. Zimmerman (202) 245-0202.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RETAC arose from a proceeding instituted by
the Board, in Establishment of a Rail Energy Transportation Advisory
Committee, EP 670. RETAC was formed to provide advice and guidance to
the Board, and to serve as a forum for discussion of emerging issues
regarding the transportation by rail of energy
[[Page 53375]]
resources, particularly, but not necessarily limited to, coal, ethanol,
and other biofuels. The purpose of this meeting is to continue
discussions regarding issues such as rail performance, capacity
constraints, infrastructure planning and development, and effective
coordination among suppliers, carriers, and users of energy resources.
Potential agenda items include further consideration of a white paper
on industry Best Practices; a Performance Measures subcommittee update
on the trends shown in the most recent industry data; discussion of how
potential regulation of coal plant emissions may impact coal/rail
demand in the future; discussion of railroads' preparations for the
fall and winter seasons; and roundtable discussions on shipment
ratability, utility inventory levels, current rail operations, and rail
service metrics.
The meeting, which is open to the public, will be conducted
pursuant to RETAC's charter and Board procedures. All guests will need
to check in at the front desk, show a picture I.D., receive a visitor's
badge, and will be escorted to the 2nd floor.
Further communications about this meeting may be announced through
the Board's Web site at www.stb.dot.gov.
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721, 49 U.S.C. 11101; 49 U.S.C. 11121.
Decided: August 26, 2010.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-21796 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P