Federal Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Risk Analysis Protocol, 53273-53274 [2010-21712]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
during normal business hours) at the
above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Lisa Rotterman (907) 271–1692,
lisa.rotterman@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS published a notice in the
Federal Register on June 29, 2010,
announcing the initiation of a 5–year
review of the eastern Distinct
Population Segment (DPS) of the Steller
Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus) under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA) and requesting
information related to that review (75
FR 37385). A notice correcting the email
address and fax number to which
comments and information should be
sent was published July 7, 2010 (75 FR
38979). Written comments were due by
August 30, 2010. NMFS has decided to
reopen the public comment period for
an additional 45 days, to October 14,
2010.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: August 25, 2010.
Therese Conant,
Acting Chief, Endangered Species Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21708 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XY53
Federal Aquatic Nuisance Species
Research Risk Analysis Protocol
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
revised research protocol; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
announces the availability of the draft
revised Federal Aquatic Nuisance
Species Research Risk Analysis Protocol
(Protocol), developed by the Research
Protocol Committee, a committee of the
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force
(ANSTF). The Protocol is available for
public review and comment.
DATES: Comments must be received
within 45 days after August 31, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
draft revised Protocol are available on
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
the ANSTF website, https://
anstaskforce.gov/documents.php. To
obtain a hard copy of the draft revised
Protocol or to submit comments, see
Document Availability and Public
Comment, respectively, under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret M. (Peg) Brady, NOAA Policy
Liaison to the Aquatic Nuisance Species
Task Force. 1315 East West Highway,
SSMC 3, Rm. 15531 Silver Spring, MD
20910 Phone: 301–713–0174; Email:
Peg.Brady@noaa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task
Force (ANSTF) is an intergovernmental
organization dedicated to preventing
and controlling aquatic nuisance
species, and implementing the
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance
Prevention and Control Act. The
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration and U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service serve as co-chairs of the
ANSTF. The ANSTF developed a
research protocol as is required by the
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance
Prevention and Control Act of 1990
(NANPCA, Public Law 101–646, 104
STAT. 4671, 16 U.S.C. 4701–4741), as
amended by the National Invasive
Species Act, 1996. Section 1202(f)(2) of
NANPCA directs the ANSTF to
establish a protocol ‘‘to ensure that
research activities carried out under
[NANPCA] do not result in the
introduction of aquatic nuisance species
to waters of the United States.’’
Responsibility for actual use of this
Protocol is specified in section (f)(3) of
the NANPCA: ‘‘The Task Force shall
allocate funds authorized under this Act
for competitive research grants to study
all aspects of aquatic nuisance species,
which shall be administered through the
National Sea Grant College Program and
the Cooperative Fishery and Wildlife
Research Units. Grants shall be
conditioned to ensure that any recipient
of funds follows the protocol
established under paragraph (2) of this
subsection.’’
Throughout this document both the
descriptors ‘‘nonindigenous’’ and/or
‘‘nuisance’’ are used when referring to
aquatic species that are the target of this
risk analysis. Language used in the
NANPCA differentiates between a
nonindigenous species and a nuisance
species, with a ‘‘nonindigenous’’ label
being solely based on the historic range
of the species, while a ‘‘nuisance’’
designation is based on a species being
both nonindigenous and potentially
harmful (‘‘threatens the diversity or
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53273
abundance of native species or the
ecological stability of infested waters, or
commercial, agricultural, aquacultural
or recreational activities dependent on
such waters’’). The ANSTF Research
Committee adopted a precautionary
approach by targeting this risk analysis
to all aquatic nonindigenous species
research, regardless of the ‘‘nuisance’’
designation. The intent of the
procedures outlined herein is to
minimize to the extent practicable the
risk of release and spread of aquatic
nonindigenous species into areas they
do not yet inhabit, since any
nonindigenous species may become a
nuisance species. Not only is it often not
possible to be sure that a species won’t
become a nuisance (as defined) in the
future, the possession and/or release of
nonindigenous species may be illegal
under various Federal, State, or local
laws, which may or may not
differentiate between nonindigenous
and nuisance species.
Background
When finalized, this document (‘‘the
Protocol’’) would replace the previously
established ‘‘Protocol for Evaluating
Research Proposals Concerning Aquatic
Nonindigenous Species,’’ adopted in
draft form in 1992 and finalized and
published by the ANSTF in July 1994.
The 1994 protocol applies only to
research involving aquatic
nonindigenous species (ANS) and is
designed to reduce the risk that research
activities may cause introduction or
spread of such aquatic species. Other
potential means of introduction, such as
bait movement, aquaria disposal, ballast
water discharge, movement of
recreational boats, movement of fishing
gear, and horticultural sales, are not
addressed in the 1994 protocol.
In 2008 the ANSTF requested the
Research Committee (a Committee of the
ANSTF) to evaluate and recommend
revisions to the 1994 protocol, as
needed. According to the Society for
Risk Analysis (SRA, https://
www.sra.org), the elements or
components of a risk analysis include
risk assessment, risk characterization,
risk communication, risk management,
and policy relating to risk. This revised
Protocol incorporates three of those
elements it requires a risk assessment
(Part I) and then, if needed,
establishment and implementation of a
risk management plan (Part II), with the
combined results communicated to the
funding agency as part of the proposal
and funding process. Therefore, this
revised Protocol is renamed ‘‘Federal
Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Risk
Analysis Protocol.’’ The draft was
approved by the ANSTF on November
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
53274
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
5, 2009; distribution of the document for
public comment is the final step for the
ANSTF to adopt the Protocol.
This Protocol supplements, but does
not replace, other existing Federal
guidelines established to control
activities with specific major classes of
organisms. This document does not
eliminate or in any way affect other
applicable legal requirements, including
the National Environmental Policy Act
[NEPA, 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)].
The Protocol encourages the
incorporation of a Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Point (HACCP)
approach for prevention planning
within research activities. Information
about the use of HACCP is available at
https://www.seagrant.umn.edu/ais/
haccp. A web site detailing the
application of HACCP to natural
resource pathways, plus a link to
download a HACCP wizard that helps
create HACCP plans, can be found at
https://www.haccp-nrm.org.
Document Availability
You may obtain copies of the Protocol
by any one of the following methods:
• Internet: https://anstaskforce.gov/
documents.php
• Write: Susan Pasko, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. 1315 East West
Highway, SSMC 3, Rm. 15531 Silver
Spring, MD 20910; Telephone: (301)
713–0174 x 165; Email:
Susan.Pasko@noaa.gov
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
Comments on the draft Protocol are
invited. The ANSTF will review all
submitted comments and make
revisions, as appropriate, to the Protocol
before going final. You may submit a
written comment by any one of the
following methods:
• Email: Susan.Pasko@noaa.gov
• Mail or hand-delivery: Susan Pasko,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. 1315 East West
Highway, SSMC 3, Rm. 15531 Silver
Spring, MD 20910
• Fax: (301) 713–1594
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment including your
personal identifying information may be
made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: August 24, 2010.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Director, Office of Habitat Conservation,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21712 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) has received requests
to conduct administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with July
anniversary dates. In accordance with
the Department’s regulations, we are
initiating those administrative reviews.
The Department also received a request
to defer the initiation of administrative
review for one antidumping duty order.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2010
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), for administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with July
anniversary dates. The Department also
received a request to defer for one year
the initiation of the July 1, 2009 through
June 30, 2010 administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on Certain
Pasta from Italy with respect to one
exporter in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(c). The Department received no
objections to this request from any party
cited in 19 CFR 351.213(c)(1)(ii).
Notice of No Sales
Under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the
Department may rescind a review where
there are no exports, sales, or entries of
subject merchandise during the
respective period of review (‘‘POR’’)
listed below. If a producer or exporter
named in this initiation notice had no
exports, sales, or entries during the
POR, it should notify the Department
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
within 60 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. The
Department will consider rescinding the
review only if the producer or exporter,
as appropriate, submits a properly filed
and timely statement certifying that it
had no exports, sales, or entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
All submissions must be made in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303 and
are subject to verification in accordance
with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). Six copies
of the submission should be submitted
to the Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i),
a copy of each request must be served
on every party on the Department’s
service list.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews,
the Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the POR. We intend to
release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within five days of publication of this
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 20 days of publication of this
Federal Register notice. The
Department invites comments regarding
the CBP data and respondent selection
within 10 calendar days of publication
of this Federal Register notice.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving non-market
economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the
Department begins with a rebuttable
presumption that all companies within
the country are subject to government
control and, thus, should be assigned a
single antidumping duty deposit rate. It
is the Department’s policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an
administrative review in an NME
country this single rate unless an
exporter can demonstrate that it is
sufficiently independent so as to be
entitled to a separate rate.
To establish whether a firm is
sufficiently independent from
government control of its export
activities to be entitled to a separate
rate, the Department analyzes each
entity exporting the subject
merchandise under a test arising from
the Final Determination of Sales at Less
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53273-53274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21712]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XY53
Federal Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Risk Analysis Protocol
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft revised research protocol;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
announces the availability of the draft revised Federal Aquatic
Nuisance Species Research Risk Analysis Protocol (Protocol), developed
by the Research Protocol Committee, a committee of the Aquatic Nuisance
Species Task Force (ANSTF). The Protocol is available for public review
and comment.
DATES: Comments must be received within 45 days after August 31, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the draft revised Protocol are
available on the ANSTF website, https://anstaskforce.gov/documents.php.
To obtain a hard copy of the draft revised Protocol or to submit
comments, see Document Availability and Public Comment, respectively,
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. (Peg) Brady, NOAA Policy
Liaison to the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. 1315 East West
Highway, SSMC 3, Rm. 15531 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone: 301-713-0174;
Email: Peg.Brady@noaa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force (ANSTF) is an
intergovernmental organization dedicated to preventing and controlling
aquatic nuisance species, and implementing the Nonindigenous Aquatic
Nuisance Prevention and Control Act. The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service serve as
co-chairs of the ANSTF. The ANSTF developed a research protocol as is
required by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control
Act of 1990 (NANPCA, Public Law 101-646, 104 STAT. 4671, 16 U.S.C.
4701-4741), as amended by the National Invasive Species Act, 1996.
Section 1202(f)(2) of NANPCA directs the ANSTF to establish a protocol
``to ensure that research activities carried out under [NANPCA] do not
result in the introduction of aquatic nuisance species to waters of the
United States.''
Responsibility for actual use of this Protocol is specified in
section (f)(3) of the NANPCA: ``The Task Force shall allocate funds
authorized under this Act for competitive research grants to study all
aspects of aquatic nuisance species, which shall be administered
through the National Sea Grant College Program and the Cooperative
Fishery and Wildlife Research Units. Grants shall be conditioned to
ensure that any recipient of funds follows the protocol established
under paragraph (2) of this subsection.''
Throughout this document both the descriptors ``nonindigenous''
and/or ``nuisance'' are used when referring to aquatic species that are
the target of this risk analysis. Language used in the NANPCA
differentiates between a nonindigenous species and a nuisance species,
with a ``nonindigenous'' label being solely based on the historic range
of the species, while a ``nuisance'' designation is based on a species
being both nonindigenous and potentially harmful (``threatens the
diversity or abundance of native species or the ecological stability of
infested waters, or commercial, agricultural, aquacultural or
recreational activities dependent on such waters''). The ANSTF Research
Committee adopted a precautionary approach by targeting this risk
analysis to all aquatic nonindigenous species research, regardless of
the ``nuisance'' designation. The intent of the procedures outlined
herein is to minimize to the extent practicable the risk of release and
spread of aquatic nonindigenous species into areas they do not yet
inhabit, since any nonindigenous species may become a nuisance species.
Not only is it often not possible to be sure that a species won't
become a nuisance (as defined) in the future, the possession and/or
release of nonindigenous species may be illegal under various Federal,
State, or local laws, which may or may not differentiate between
nonindigenous and nuisance species.
Background
When finalized, this document (``the Protocol'') would replace the
previously established ``Protocol for Evaluating Research Proposals
Concerning Aquatic Nonindigenous Species,'' adopted in draft form in
1992 and finalized and published by the ANSTF in July 1994. The 1994
protocol applies only to research involving aquatic nonindigenous
species (ANS) and is designed to reduce the risk that research
activities may cause introduction or spread of such aquatic species.
Other potential means of introduction, such as bait movement, aquaria
disposal, ballast water discharge, movement of recreational boats,
movement of fishing gear, and horticultural sales, are not addressed in
the 1994 protocol.
In 2008 the ANSTF requested the Research Committee (a Committee of
the ANSTF) to evaluate and recommend revisions to the 1994 protocol, as
needed. According to the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA, https://www.sra.org), the elements or components of a risk analysis include
risk assessment, risk characterization, risk communication, risk
management, and policy relating to risk. This revised Protocol
incorporates three of those elements it requires a risk assessment
(Part I) and then, if needed, establishment and implementation of a
risk management plan (Part II), with the combined results communicated
to the funding agency as part of the proposal and funding process.
Therefore, this revised Protocol is renamed ``Federal Aquatic Nuisance
Species Research Risk Analysis Protocol.'' The draft was approved by
the ANSTF on November
[[Page 53274]]
5, 2009; distribution of the document for public comment is the final
step for the ANSTF to adopt the Protocol.
This Protocol supplements, but does not replace, other existing
Federal guidelines established to control activities with specific
major classes of organisms. This document does not eliminate or in any
way affect other applicable legal requirements, including the National
Environmental Policy Act [NEPA, 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)].
The Protocol encourages the incorporation of a Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Point (HACCP) approach for prevention planning within
research activities. Information about the use of HACCP is available at
https://www.seagrant.umn.edu/ais/haccp. A web site detailing the
application of HACCP to natural resource pathways, plus a link to
download a HACCP wizard that helps create HACCP plans, can be found at
https://www.haccp-nrm.org.
Document Availability
You may obtain copies of the Protocol by any one of the following
methods:
Internet: https://anstaskforce.gov/documents.php
Write: Susan Pasko, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. 1315 East West Highway, SSMC 3, Rm. 15531 Silver
Spring, MD 20910; Telephone: (301) 713-0174 x 165; Email:
Susan.Pasko@noaa.gov
Request for Comments
Comments on the draft Protocol are invited. The ANSTF will review
all submitted comments and make revisions, as appropriate, to the
Protocol before going final. You may submit a written comment by any
one of the following methods:
Email: Susan.Pasko@noaa.gov
Mail or hand-delivery: Susan Pasko, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. 1315 East West Highway, SSMC 3, Rm. 15531
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Fax: (301) 713-1594
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying
information may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: August 24, 2010.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Director, Office of Habitat Conservation, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21712 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S